😭Omg, you know about that too? I am so so so sad about it, I am still recovering. I had a whole collection - that I hadn't backed up yet and I am kicking myself for taking it for granted. It's like another burning of a Library - I miss the search features available on the Internet Archive - they made it so easy. I hope they bring more Computer Scientists on board to write algorithms that protect it from ddos attacks & other manners of hacking.😢
I love his channel, he does such great research and work on African History - He is part of my inspiration for creating this channel. I encourage everyone to subscribe to him.
This is very interesting, it reminds me of an interview I watched of a Rwandan Tutsi man, born in Uganda, stating that east Africa Great Lakes was invaded by people from the west Africa, who took wives of the Bantu, I thought he was just being divisive, because I have never heard of this type of history😮
@@cleophaskubasuthe hutu are not related to proto-bantu, they look like zande or general ancient pre-bantu congolese. They are not khemites. Tutsis can make more claims but they are more like nilotes, so khemiticized nilotes maybe.
@Philis911 Bantu originate from my country Uganda, we have the mountain Walussi which is our place of origin, it's the holy mountain, all of our gods are on that mountain. West african languages are not related to our bantu languages at all.
Zanzibar comes from the Zanj if I am not wrong. The Arabs literally called the whole of Eastern Africa region as Sea of Zanj. The Coast was known as Sawahili resulting in Swahili (people of this Coast). TANZANIA? AZANIA? Thanks for sharing.
@@Cvr5ta0ywayou need to do research if you are saying the original arabs weren't ppl with african phenptypes. Stop reducing africa to west africa, west africa has nothing to do with arabs.
no, not fula, they are too far west and never went south of Equator (they are dominantly sahelian). Its some arab-influenced people coming out of the congo who originate from west africa (congo is not west africa, it is upper nile valley). These people invaded south east bantu land. Im looking into it myself but kongo bantus are khemites, not Zanjis. Kongo Khemites never talked to Arabs/Muslims, just Portugese and Germanic Tribes. Why we have very low muslim rates.
@@X60Gamers Give me a chronology. 1. When and 2. where did these 'West Africans' encounter Arabs? 3. Was it before or after they arrived in Congo? The most 'Arabised' West Africans are the Sahelian tribes (Fulani, Hausa, Mandinka, Wolof, Kanuri, Zaghawa etc. hundreds more). Why weren't the so called Zanj who invaded Bantus ever Islamised except the Swahili, Comorians etc? There is zero genetic or anthropological evidence to prove it. Where are the Zanj today? What DNA or anthropological markers designate them? Hutus are Zanj and Tutsis are proto-Bantu? Based on what?
@@user-vw6bk4pb4lthere are sizable groups of muslims in cameroon which bleeds into kongo, as far down as Gabon but no farther south than there. And as far east as Central African Republic, but not too many in DRC. Sudan also has a population resistent to islamization, and nilotes seemingly are also non-muslim but have clearly interacted with Arabs. These would be by 10-15th century AD as it was for most populations in para-equatorial africa. The arabs described Nyam-Nyam people (who Ive isolated as potentially azande, who name themselves niam-niam) as resistent to islamization. You cant really use physical anthropology to designate origin of groups or individuals. But theyd look like west africans and sudanese. Not like proto-bantu, who are the dark-skinned ancient egyptian priests with long skulls, this is what the batonga look like. The Zanjis are undeniably kongo due to teeth sharpening being within the kongo cultural spectrum. Kongo Khemites don't do teeth sharpening unless they are assimilating to that type of culture.
Arab means intermingled in Canaanite. I am indigenous American and fully aware we are not all out of Africa. Also Africa is a Roman invention and it'd be great if you could show what the name of the continent was before the final Punic war. What is your point trying to define different groups in Africa, all while noting they all experience "racist" behavior from the derivative recessive groups worldwide?
I do this because Africa is built on lies and we all deserve to know the historical truth as it happened - which helps us explain why things are the way they are - Why Ethiopia explodes every ten-twenty years, Somalia is basically Somalia, the Proto-Bantu identity was appropriated and denigrate as ignorant when they built all those stone ruins & talked to the stars, the sellouts sell entire countries for a $1m kickback to buy a Rolls Royce or Range Rover they will drive on a potholed road or why the newer models almost never fail to unalive the people that still look like their ancestors - Sudan's Arabs unaliving their Nilotic-Kin or the Griqua(before they were Colored) unalived their San-Kin or the Afro-Portuguese doing the same. Also Not all Africans suffer from racism - only those that are desperate to be accepted where they are not welcomed suffer from it - and these tend to become the sellouts who cause problems for everybody when their insecurities are exploited - case in point Sudan’s current forgotten war. Learn more about Kwame Nkrumah’s arranged(not organically fell in love but bartered to him) marriage to an Egyptian Woman who knew nothing of his culture - read the psycho social reasoning that went awarding him that wife. When a better match for him would’ve been dating from all the educated women especially in Ghana who shared his culture, experiences, funded and understood the mission. On racism - ‘Only you’d the nightmare, everybody else slept fine’ - African Proverb. Don’t assume others are experiencing what you are going through because the choices made lead us into the mouth of lion or safely home. What is the point? - Since you are indigenous American - I will have you answer your own question - What is the point of differentiating between Comanche and Apache when they were all driven close to extinction and barely exist anymore - why not just forget about it right? The Arab Lady Scholar I know said it meant 'traveler' so I took her word for it.
@@inyenyenzi They call it tribes when it is offshots of the same blood linguistic and cultural family. There are impersonators who are Mongoloid in origin brought in during the TransPacific as mercenaries against the "copper colored" Indians. I can tell you are not familiar with true American history. It seems like you desire to avenge your bloodline against skinfolk who are not kinfolk. When I acknowledge my bloodline and know that we had adversaries of the same skin pigment before 1492, I am not ultimately trying to avenge whatever conflicts occurred before then. You see the problem is the Recessives taking over the world tainted the ENTIRE world's waters which all biological life needs - with petroleum plastic. Is what you are doing going to address this greatest crime? Or maybe I should be like you, distinguishing eumelinated Africans who lead Colon here to the Americas from the misnamed "African Americans" who or Aboriginal to America predating Musa's visit?
@@emperoar-ressht-hruoraclet5389you might be indigenous american because only 14% of blacks came from slaves but your ancestral root's are ptahites or so called "africa"
If deep research is done, you will also know that the "Prophet" came from African Arabians situated in Yemen. His people or cultural group was called the Qureshi people. Not sure how many of them today are actually still phenotypically African, but original Arabs or authentic Arabs were African people. Pale skin was a disgrace if you dig deep into further research. The reason was the Caucasians who had resentment against Africans or original Arabs, they were once slaves of there true Arabian masters. The Moors were known for enslaving Iranians, Iraqis and Turks into the salve markets of North Africa(Egypt). The Moors also enslaved Europeans, so you can say the tables were turned around...Since these Caucasians people mix bred they are now called Arabs today. Interesting how life is...Great video!
Do you realize that you are spreading the much talked about Hamitic theory? A theory that claimed to attribute the origin of black civilizations to a group of "Caucasian blacks" who were "strategically" placed in important civilizations within Africa. Obviously, the groups that were used for these narratives were mainly Cushites (Ethiopian people) and Arabized blacks who often had nothing to do with the civilizations. In the same West Africa that you speak so repulsively about, perished from the same theory; the Congo, Egypt, Kush and the great Swahili civilization also perished from this. I love how you speak so confidently about something that is obvious from miles away that you have not studied well. Don't you realize that you are spreading a European theory? If the "proto-Bantu" were really like you say, most of the proto-Bantu populations would look physically like this, since you yourself say that the Zanj and West Africans did everything possible to look "whiter". Most of the "proto-Bantu" groups you mention do not fit into the pattern you yourself impose of "true Egyptians" who, by the way, were melanized and black like the groups currently living between Sudan and Egypt. They were more likely to be Nilotic and Nubian than Bantu. And about the Tutsis, whom you insist so much on coining the Bantu culture, they are a mainly Nilotic and Cushitic group that came from Abyssinia (if I'm not mistaken, through the Arabs), who practiced intensive herding and who created their culture by taking the language and dance that was practiced (and still is) by the peoples who inhabited the region of Rwanda. I encourage you to look further into how the inequalities between the Twa and Hutu peoples that the Tutsis benefited from ended in genocide. Obviously the Tutsis were the perfect ethnic group to take all the credit from the "black and ragged people as you say" who lived there. I am surprised that people have accepted that narrative so easily. You have clearly never been to West Africa and have been carried away by the European and Arab narrative of how many people there were viewed.
Thanks for watching and I believe you have misunderstood. I am simply using primary sources to correct false information. I went into this open minded and ready for whatever result I would find and according to the people who knew them - the Zanj were a seafaring population who sailed to and fro West Africa. I used primary sources not theories. Something to think about as you read - What happened to the men of a population when they lost a war or invasion? With regards to the Tusi you fail to take into account the violent raids, pillaging and genocides that resulted in a DNA shift - which resulted in the men from the invaded population being un-alived to a point that their haplogroup Y is now found in trace amounts and the women being abducted to assaulted and made to birth the assaulters children who carried the new halplogroup Y which gives the false result that the Tusi are Nilotic - they aren’t - we know this because they are part of the Nkhoya-Subiya people who fled south and some to the Gabon during these invasions. My Grandmother’s family are from these populations - we were taught the stories and know them. Their name is correctly spelled ’Tusi’ - which means ‘we, the paramount’. There seem to have been non-White people living outside Africa too - the same way the populations in Papua New Guinea or the Andaman Islands are not African but would be said to have an ‘African Phenotype’. Still figuring this out. I am simply following linguistics, ethnology and DNA to accurately have African History so that everyone’s story can be heard - everyone. The DNA of the Zanj supports my linguistic and ethnological findings. E1b1b haplogroup Y is shared by the Maasai and other West African populations which is odd and shouldn’t be the case - conventional history says these two never met - so how do the Maasai a Nilotic Group share paternal DNA said to be out of West Africa? Theirs has multiple admixtures from four other paternal lineages - which means four distinct paternal lines were merged into this one - the frequencies can tell us who is most dominant and where they trace their origin - E1b1b is the most dominant in the Maasai - which says they have a high frequency of West African paternal DNA. A3b2 - 27% - Nilotic Haplogroup [Dinka, Nuer, Shilluk, other Sudanese, Somali and the Oromo] E1b1a1 - 12% - West African - Yoruba, Igbo, Mande, Wolof, Akan, BaKongo, Zulu, Xhosa, Shona B-M60 - 8% - Mbuti, Biaka (Proto-Sudanic) All these populations are concentrated in West Africa and Proto-Sudan and are the populations said to have been Zanj - the Zulu, Xhosa, Shona, Sotho were Zanj invaders in Southern Africa on the Proto-Bantu - we know this because of the presence of the Nilo-Saharan languages as a superstratum - showing this group dominated because their language is the dominant and the Proto-Bantu language became a substratum - showing this group was subjugated. Linguistics allows us to tell the social relationships expressed in a population’s DNA. Follow the movements of these groups and their linguistics like I did in my first video - your result is they are Zanj The presence of this haplogroup Y diversity, their location and linguistics is evidence they are part of the Zanj which means ‘numerous people’ and their DNA is concentrated in West African - Sudan populations. We know they are for certain through ethnology. Their spear and shield were adapted and used by Shaka - those were very specific designs and the length and style of their blade matches Shaka’s - Shaka was out of a population in Delagoa Bay which was under Muzimba who was a Zanj and a Portuguese mercenary - he helped the Portuguese defeat the Moonga(Proto-Bantu) at Sena-Tete and the Lupata mountain region. He is likely the source of the Cheva(Chewa) language whose admixture is present in Zulu - Cheva(Chewa) is called Nyanja in Zambia and shouldn’t be present in Zulu - not according to modern explanation of African History - but it is and Cheva has Somali admixture - still tracing all it’s admixtures The Proto-Bantu male haplogroup Y is now present in small frequencies because most were un-alived by the invaders. The women were spared and abducted - this is evident in the language shift. Theirs seems to have been haplogroup E1b1b which is found across all the populations invaded by the Zanj in trace amounts. I primarily use linguistics which is easily mapped to ethnology and these findings can be supported by DNA. Because DNA can be mapped to language, language can be mapped to ethnology which is how I get my results - you’ve to tell the story of the DNA not just take it at face value and this story is told through the language patterns. African History is vast, it will be uncomfortable for a lot of people because their narrative isn't true -we've always known this about all of you - it's time you knew it about yourselves - the ignorance is why the continent is so messed up. I'd stop using the term Cushitic - the language spoken by the Kasha(Ksh) the Meroitic Script was related to the Proto-Bantu - Current populations who claim to be Cushitic have no idea what the scripts say when they ought to know - but we who speak the Proto-Bantu language do - so I hope you can see the constant misappropriation of their culture which has led to your own erroneous conclusions - the Kushites were invaded by a Nilo-Saharan population just like the Proto-Bantu in Southern Africa but they were originally Proto-Bantu. The surviving Proto-Bantu Women refused to teach the invaders children. There is a Southern African proverb that goes - 'A man can tie but cannot tame a Leopard.' As for the Hamatic Theory - I don't know about that - but I can tell you it's not Ham but Hn - add the missing vowels - Hana Hana is a Proto-Bantu title that means majesty - Ancient Egypt, at least the Proto-Bantu related one fell in 342* BCE so whatever came after wasn't them. African History is more interesting without the lies - we haven't even talked about the other hominids admixtures 😂 Homo heidelbergensis, Homo Naledi, the Ghost Populations 😂this will be a mess - I think we deserve to know it
@@inyenyenzi, You just confirmed that you are ignorant. I encourage you to watch the videos on this guy's channel who explains in detail and with REAL PROOF the origin of the Egyptian civilization and DNA in Africa: www.youtube.com/@AbovetheClouds-en4il/videos about Swahili Civilization: ruclips.net/video/-07ZNkvqjDs/видео.html&ab_channel=GreshamCollege 1. The Zanj are a group originating from the Great Lakes in Africa, not from West Africa. If you search on the internet, no one relates these two peoples. 2. The dominant gene among the Bantu and West African population is E1B1A, not E1B1B (this is typical of the Cushite peoples and some Arab and Nilotic peoples). In fact, the E halogroup was born in East Africa. 3. The Egyptian people were not even light-skinned, they are dark like their descendants in Sudan; They had woolly hair and wide noses, why do you think most statues have cut lips and noses? Literally a quick search of non-Arab Nubians will show you the real Egyptian people. 4. The Tutsis are a combination of Cushites, Nilotics and Bantu, in fact it is from the Nilotic people that they adopted the culture of herding and cow worship, which also relates them to the Cushites (who are said to be a crossbreeding of proto-Nilotics and Eurasians). 5. The black peoples outside of Africa are part of the first groups that left Africa, they are not a population that left recently. They have been away for thousands of years. 6. Those who invaded Kush were not Nilo-Saharan people, because Kush were Nilo-Saharan people (does the NILE ring a bell?); Furthermore, it is assumed that it was the Axum Empire that invaded Kush (your proto-Bantu people).
Much of what you are saying is unsubstantiated and not supported by archeological and genetic study. And you dont provide any sources other than your grandmother.
The sources are in the description box - and we are yet to get to the Jaggas/Chaggas, Gallas, Chikundas, Muzimbas, Bergenaar Bastards, Griqua, Kazembe - Africa has a history which still influences the outcomes we see today. The abductions were experienced by my Grandmother's paternal Grandmother fortunately for her, she was married off to one of the Nkhoya Vassals at the time because 'she'd have made a difficult wife for the rest of them' - so there is your primary source - and also my Grandmothers were the Cultural Custodians and the other was an Oracle - that's who since you are unfamiliar with Proto-Bantu culture - know the history and tell it - like the Griots do in Mali - do you want it to come from a European book? And all you've to do is find a documentary or better yet go to Rwanda and interview the Tusi women who survived that genocide - they are still living. I will create a video where I cover how the Subiya Women were abducted so the children of the abductees could be taller and have lighter skin- since the Subiya were tall women with that coffee-milk skintone and the people that abducted them felt in need of those features - so they often had to bend their necks to look up at them - there are songs about it. My Grandmother's maternal Grandmother was Subiya - they lived this reality. I will say this in a way you will understand because you are so accustomed to getting your history from a a colonial European source - who do you think were their primary sources - well mostly Africans who weren't the cultural custodians which is why they got so much wrong - but here's your genetic evidence. "Your genetic evidence is the presence of the 'negro-look' so far away from 'negro-land' which is they called "West African Sudan-Upper & Lower Guinea region" - pull a map from the 1800s - did I say that ugly enough for you? Just because you don't know your history doesn't mean everybody else doesn't. I grew up close to my Grandmothers and Grandfathers and I was taught - since what was written was looted or erased - did you know there is an Obelisk at Port Elizabeth and it once had painted hieroglyphs but those are all gone now? Decolonize your mind and stop excepting Europeans to write your history before you can believe it - that's just messed up. Get a self-esteem. Your comment irked me - don't insult my Grandmothers - they were highly intelligent and respected women - and better me than them to tell it - I have sanitized it.
@@inyenyenzi, You talk about decolonizing your mind, but you keep propagating Hamitic theory and European writers. And there are coffee-and-milk tones among the most isolated groups in Africa. If they had the appearance you say, a large part of their population would still maintain it. The only group that has been praised for its features are the Abyssinian groups in Ethiopia (and that's despite the fact that the Europeans kept emphasizing that they had very dark skin).
@@inyenyenzi Around 1442, the Portuguese first arrived in Southern Africa while trying to find a sea route to India. The term negro, literally meaning 'black', was used by the Spanish and Portuguese as a simple description to refer to the Bantu peoples that they encountered.
I have to watch this a few times, it left me confused, but only because I've never heard this before, if I go off and study, blanks will be filled in. But wiki has Zanj for Southeast Africa, the Swahili Coast or is that another Zanj? A part of Africa's problem clearly was cooperating with Arabs, and accepting the western terms and definitions. Africa seems to have embraced the term Bantu. Bantu came from Wilhelm Bleek, how can a German come in Africa and classify a whole continent languages, he so would have got so much wrong, ignored many and made a lot of mistakes. Quite frankly, black Africans shouldn't want to marry Abyssinationate people, that would be you injecting Arab in your blood and further Arabanising Africa.
Thanks for watching. Part Two will tie it all together because I use the sources to show the Zanj's location/origin. I agree the meaning of the expression Bantu was misunderstood and misused. Bantu is our expression - it is part of our language but what Bleek did was define everyone who spoke a derivative of our language as Bantu - now this is like finding everyone who speaks English as saying they are English - it erases alot - which is what happened. Bantu was never used to define everyone, just the Proto-Bantu - it means 'without a doubt we are the ideal manifestation of the ancient guardians' - it never means 'people' - we don't really have a word for people - 'sa' means familiars - 'ntu' means 'undoubtedly us/we' - we are very specific and call others by their 'tribe' name. Which is why 'Bantu' is not applied to Europeans we say 'Makuwa' or 'Ma French' or 'Ma Germans' just like before 1870, it was 'Ma Tebele', 'Ma ntati' or 'Ma Shona'. As for the Phenotypes - I am doing my best to help people understand that Africans had many Phenotypes and not just the current Delta-Cameroon-Congolese Phenotype. Like the San most people had distinct Phenotypes and that doesn't mean they were mixed. It just means the place they lived for thousands of years was further from the sun and they are still African. Arabization gives an undertone that is different from the African undertone of the same hue - some people in Congo have it and it is different from the San or Proto-Bantu undertone - it is much similar to the Somali undertone. I talk about skin-tones because it is an underlying problem in Africa that we need to understand and figure out.
@@inyenyenzi Thanks for the reply, food for thought, and I will be looking forward to part 2, and slowly will be going through all your videos. The King's Monologue recommended your channel to us.
This is a bunch of malarkey. As an Asante i don,t know any africans except psychologically damaged ones who goes out of their way to marry an abyssinian looking african. We consider their genealogy suspect as they are not pure africans . Most of the people living in the horn were not the original population 3,000 years ago but resulted failed invasions of that area by Anatolian invaders in which the invading men were killed and their women were taken as wives. We do not like non-african blood in our lineage.
@@maxwell6525 it’s like a mockery on negroid features just because they are original and not mixed with any entities….and be called scary just coz of their broad nose and big lips
The Zanj seem to have been west of Proto-Sudan(West African Sudan) - were seafaring people and had control of the West Coast of Africa - they may have integrated and mixed
Zanj/Shenzi/Chwezi the Abachwezi are not invaders the bachwezi is a bantu priestly empire of Kingdoms. The Arabs didnt pronounce Chwezi they started mispronounciation
I added the primary sources to the description box- read through them when you can - did the Chwezi live near the Senegambian River? Where they Seafaring People? - the last time I made a video of the Zanj no one seemed to want to claim them. The sources show the first Zanj in Proto-Bantu territory invaded at what would become Sofala - creating the Sotho speaking people in 900CE/AD. Prior to this, there currently no Zanj anywhere in Proto-Bantu(East to Southern Africa) or Abyssinian territory. So the Chwezi may have been another group of Zanj who invaded Proto-Bantu territory after 1000 CE/AD - this might be the same group that would later invade Great Zimbabwe with Shangambire?(that's a thought not a fact) If the Chwezi are the Zanj, then their language should have fragments of their history. I will look into it.
@@inyenyenzi the Chwezi are linked to the Mountains of the moon priestly class they are not invaders. Chwezi can be linked with Bunyoro Kitara and Busongora whose history goes for more than 20,000 yrs. It was an empire that cpvered a vast territory. Maybe the invasion of of Sofala was due to the gold which people like the Lemba clearly tell they came from Yemen to the region to look fpr gold. Chwezi themselves are not invaders I am one of those from the Chwezi
@@cleophaskubasu Is this related to Monoemugi ? Reading books from the 14th century the portugese describe Monoemugi as an empire that controlled the great lakes of Africa and the port cities of the zanji coast were apart of its domain . Also I would like to know the relation between Monomotapa and Monoemugi are these two empire related to each other ?
@@cleophaskubasuThank you . I do see nothing under the Sun is more compromised than history becauase everyone can read a book and reference it and present it for truth. What makes these tellers think what they read in a book is absolete truth. The Zenj were not invaders .
Could one of the historians yu are talking about be Ibn Khaldoun? The other point is that it's the Tutsi-Hema who were trying to create an Empire around the time of the genocide. Other than that I don't know a great deal of history of Fulani, Arabs, etc. like others here. But I do believe Arabs were black. I took interest in this channel because I knew for sure Bantu seems like a school word, not used colloquially except for all that foreign (South African) stuff about uBuntu etc. And many people called Bantu don't refer to themselves as that. It will be interesting to see the logical end. This time I was starting to drift off again until yu reminded of your roots in the comments. What have Zanj to do with the fez wearing(?) Kings African Rifles if some of the invaders to the south were mercenaries. All the while African people on y-t seem to be expounding on and celebrating histories like Mzilikazi. Have yu noticed?
It sounds like you are describing azande groups but i dont think they do teeth sharpening. They are Ubangian not 'Nilo-Saharan' (nilo-saharan is also not a language family). And they must have come into contact with Arabs since they are right next to So. Sudan. One of their names is Niam-Niam which ibn khaldun targeted in his racist bouts. Arabs called them nyam-nyams and hated them, so name fits. Azande seems to have some cultural input on kongo culture and through linguistics Im sure anyone can see that the northern most bantu are not bantu. They adopted the language and weakened the pronounciation. So I guess here (The Azande .... The Zanji) is who you are refering to as Zanj?
Thanks for watching - I will do a linguistic comparison of the Azande language - the Zanj were a dominant force who seem to have been larger in stature too and they lived closer to the West African coast (I explain this in part 2) - they were frightening when they needed to be and definitely a seafaring when in Africa but adapted to the desert too - primary sources show they had their own language too - still finding it - could be part of Umayyad or Abbasid Arabic because they did influence the region and culture - so naturally fragments of their language will be in those iterations of Arabic. Southern African Linguistics shows that the Zanj who invaded that region at Sofala were a Nilo-Saharan population - this Linguistic modification is also present in East Africa - the Proto-Sudan populations rarely added their languages to the derived Bantu Languages unless they were closer to the Proto-Sudan region - but beyond that they seem to have adopted a language from the Nilo-Saharan languages that mixed with the Proto-Bantu which points to subjugation and why most of them lost their origins. I am still verifying this, but it seems as if the dominant population brought with them a subjugated population when they invade Proto-Bantu territory and the answer to this might be in the Sofala area. I am looking into the language patterns - Southern Nguni languages do carry the Chewa/Nyanja admixture and this comes out of Maravi/Malawi - who may have a link to the Galla and Jagga/Chagga I call them 'Nilo-Saharan and West African Sudanic People - since the first Sudan extended across from the Senegambia river to Berberian country - which is modern day Libya - I will cover this in part two. The Proto-Sudan population like the Nilo-Saharans had many ethnic groups. Since they neighbored one another, it stands to reason these two populations interacted so the Zanj were a mixed from these regions. I use Nilo-Saharan as a regional definition not as a name of a tribe but a people from that region.
@inyenyenzi ah, okay. A lot of So. Bantu socio-political stuff i need to catch up on. If you need a high quality linguistics tool for mapping bantus, there is a book "a comparative study of bantu and semi-bantu" Johnston 1919 (possibly the most comprehensive data sets on bantu lexical items). In it I believe it does show nguni as having 'nilo-saharan' roots indicative of a substratum. Xhosa also have a high quantity of E2, i believe, which is highly correlated with Nilotes, but not all Nilotes have it. (i think its found densely in the congo, i haven't felt a need to study this Y-group so im just giving anecdotal-like thoughts here). I hope you remember that DNA tribes study on ;k.n.jtn where great lakes and nguni came up. Im pretty sure those where nilote genetics, making him a nilote like those in the rwanda and nguni bantu linguistics zones.
@@inyenyenzi The galla are an East african people not Nilo-Saharan and have a reputation for being extremely fierce they would have been the source for the jagga/chagga. Furthermore the Fulani are the people in west africa that best meet your criteria as they are spread across the Sahel from east to west africa and have a reputation .
@@maxwell6525Fula dont do teeth sharpening tho? Its not them, they also never went south of the equator. If i understand the history right, they have to be someone in the Kongo who had contact with arabs, who assimilated into nilote society, then assaulted zambia-zimbabwe, and remained.
The Prophet pbuh and companions were black people. See recent movie Lady of Heavens from UK, companions were depicted as black, original arabs were black people from Yemen and East Africa. There nothing such as white arab, they descendants of Romans Greeks Turks and Persians.
This information is taken directly from primary sources(posted in the description box - don't forget to toss a coin) and critical thinking. Ignorance is a terrible friend. And... This Woman's Grandmother was the Proto-Bantu cultural custodian, oracle and rainmaker. If you feel this is sinister & divisive wait till we get to Kuitebe(Quitebe) the Shona Capital - which means the place of debauchery - while under Shona control - it's an ugly mess - since you want to own the Siambwe(it's not Zimbabwe - doesn't mean stone house) Prior to the 1900s, the Shona were afraid of going near those stone ruins, they would report to the European Settlers whenever they heard voices - which is how the portal keys were collected & taken to private collections and waygates buried under water. It was the Shona who snitched on the location of the Ndebele Inganga - who was target in the mountains and unalived before the European Settlers could win that war against the Ndebele over the stolen Matebeland. We aren't going to be misrepresented or misappropriated ever again. Jamana.
@@jesselongbottom1088 The primary sources are available in the description box - not my fault the world wasn't unicorns and rainbows - remember to toss a coin & support this work.
@@inyenyenzi oh dear 😑 you still continue to spew incorrect information and the worst part is none of the Shona groups were even asked to verify this! Siambwe means absolutely nothing and yet we have Venda people in South Africa who have been supporting or agreeing the BaNyai Narrative which you do not happen to mention here, which further proves you're a fraud with an imaginary bone to pick with the so-called Shona!! Zimbabwe is in its mess because of Zanu not shona people. Zanu has Sotho ppl, Ndebele pp and Venda too! In another videk you mentioned about a lie that Shonas hate Tongas and most Shona ppl will even testify they have never met any Tongas in their life and what would it be that makes shonas hate Tongas? You are not normal
![Felix "Unfair" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Oswujxm2Ag0/mqdefault.jpg)
I believe your work is the reason the Internet Archive website was hacked and taken down. You're clearly effective-thank you!
😭Omg, you know about that too? I am so so so sad about it, I am still recovering. I had a whole collection - that I hadn't backed up yet and I am kicking myself for taking it for granted.
It's like another burning of a Library - I miss the search features available on the Internet Archive - they made it so easy.
I hope they bring more Computer Scientists on board to write algorithms that protect it from ddos attacks & other manners of hacking.😢
Great video, not off a beat!
Thanks for listening
You're giving kings monologue a run for his money with that voice ❤😅. Excellence in comprehension and delivery 🎉.
I love his channel, he does such great research and work on African History - He is part of my inspiration for creating this channel. I encourage everyone to subscribe to him.
Good fo ya sis. Keep dem words. Ah feel ya
This is very interesting, it reminds me of an interview I watched of a Rwandan Tutsi man, born in Uganda, stating that east Africa Great Lakes was invaded by people from the west Africa, who took wives of the Bantu, I thought he was just being divisive, because I have never heard of this type of history😮
How is he Rwandese if he was born in Uganda?
The tutsi are the ones that invaded
@@cleophaskubasuthe hutu are not related to proto-bantu, they look like zande or general ancient pre-bantu congolese. They are not khemites. Tutsis can make more claims but they are more like nilotes, so khemiticized nilotes maybe.
@@wildflower7925 hmmmm that’s why they say Bantu originated from west Afrika but it’s lies majority of Bantu oral history it’s different
@Philis911 Bantu originate from my country Uganda, we have the mountain Walussi which is our place of origin, it's the holy mountain, all of our gods are on that mountain. West african languages are not related to our bantu languages at all.
Zanzibar comes from the Zanj if I am not wrong. The Arabs literally called the whole of Eastern Africa region as Sea of Zanj. The Coast was known as Sawahili resulting in Swahili (people of this Coast). TANZANIA? AZANIA? Thanks for sharing.
The Arabs themselves were black people confuse the Kurds,Turks,Slavs and Mongol invaders as the real Arabs because they speak Arabic dialects.
Spot on!!!
No they were not.
@@Cvr5ta0ywayou need to do research if you are saying the original arabs weren't ppl with african phenptypes. Stop reducing africa to west africa, west africa has nothing to do with arabs.
@@Cvr5ta0ywaruclips.net/video/XeLjhDPAI3Y/видео.htmlsi=iyhiJ-PD0xdkw6Bu
Read a book clown
So are they essentially fula or housa proto-types, from back in the day...given the region and area?
no, not fula, they are too far west and never went south of Equator (they are dominantly sahelian). Its some arab-influenced people coming out of the congo who originate from west africa (congo is not west africa, it is upper nile valley). These people invaded south east bantu land. Im looking into it myself but kongo bantus are khemites, not Zanjis. Kongo Khemites never talked to Arabs/Muslims, just Portugese and Germanic Tribes. Why we have very low muslim rates.
@@X60Gamers thanks 👍
@@X60Gamers Give me a chronology. 1. When and 2. where did these 'West Africans' encounter Arabs? 3. Was it before or after they arrived in Congo? The most 'Arabised' West Africans are the Sahelian tribes (Fulani, Hausa, Mandinka, Wolof, Kanuri, Zaghawa etc. hundreds more). Why weren't the so called Zanj who invaded Bantus ever Islamised except the Swahili, Comorians etc?
There is zero genetic or anthropological evidence to prove it. Where are the Zanj today? What DNA or anthropological markers designate them? Hutus are Zanj and Tutsis are proto-Bantu? Based on what?
@@user-vw6bk4pb4lthere are sizable groups of muslims in cameroon which bleeds into kongo, as far down as Gabon but no farther south than there. And as far east as Central African Republic, but not too many in DRC. Sudan also has a population resistent to islamization, and nilotes seemingly are also non-muslim but have clearly interacted with Arabs.
These would be by 10-15th century AD as it was for most populations in para-equatorial africa.
The arabs described Nyam-Nyam people (who Ive isolated as potentially azande, who name themselves niam-niam) as resistent to islamization.
You cant really use physical anthropology to designate origin of groups or individuals. But theyd look like west africans and sudanese. Not like proto-bantu, who are the dark-skinned ancient egyptian priests with long skulls, this is what the batonga look like.
The Zanjis are undeniably kongo due to teeth sharpening being within the kongo cultural spectrum. Kongo Khemites don't do teeth sharpening unless they are assimilating to that type of culture.
@@user-vw6bk4pb4lThe Bemba dress like Azande, and do teeth sharpening so those are the suspect group.
Arab means intermingled in Canaanite. I am indigenous American and fully aware we are not all out of Africa. Also Africa is a Roman invention and it'd be great if you could show what the name of the continent was before the final Punic war. What is your point trying to define different groups in Africa, all while noting they all experience "racist" behavior from the derivative recessive groups worldwide?
I do this because Africa is built on lies and we all deserve to know the historical truth as it happened - which helps us explain why things are the way they are -
Why Ethiopia explodes every ten-twenty years, Somalia is basically Somalia, the Proto-Bantu identity was appropriated and denigrate as ignorant when they built all those stone ruins & talked to the stars, the sellouts sell entire countries for a $1m kickback to buy a Rolls Royce or Range Rover they will drive on a potholed road or why the newer models almost never fail to unalive the people that still look like their ancestors - Sudan's Arabs unaliving their Nilotic-Kin or the Griqua(before they were Colored) unalived their San-Kin or the Afro-Portuguese doing the same.
Also
Not all Africans suffer from racism - only those that are desperate to be accepted where they are not welcomed suffer from it - and these tend to become the sellouts who cause problems for everybody when their insecurities are exploited - case in point Sudan’s current forgotten war.
Learn more about Kwame Nkrumah’s arranged(not organically fell in love but bartered to him) marriage to an Egyptian Woman who knew nothing of his culture - read the psycho social reasoning that went awarding him that wife. When a better match for him would’ve been dating from all the educated women especially in Ghana who shared his culture, experiences, funded and understood the mission.
On racism -
‘Only you’d the nightmare, everybody else slept fine’ - African Proverb.
Don’t assume others are experiencing what you are going through because the choices made lead us into the mouth of lion or safely home.
What is the point? -
Since you are indigenous American - I will have you answer your own question -
What is the point of differentiating between Comanche and Apache when they were all driven close to extinction and barely exist anymore - why not just forget about it right?
The Arab Lady Scholar I know said it meant 'traveler' so I took her word for it.
@@inyenyenzi They call it tribes when it is offshots of the same blood linguistic and cultural family. There are impersonators who are Mongoloid in origin brought in during the TransPacific as mercenaries against the "copper colored" Indians. I can tell you are not familiar with true American history. It seems like you desire to avenge your bloodline against skinfolk who are not kinfolk. When I acknowledge my bloodline and know that we had adversaries of the same skin pigment before 1492, I am not ultimately trying to avenge whatever conflicts occurred before then. You see the problem is the Recessives taking over the world tainted the ENTIRE world's waters which all biological life needs - with petroleum plastic. Is what you are doing going to address this greatest crime? Or maybe I should be like you, distinguishing eumelinated Africans who lead Colon here to the Americas from the misnamed "African Americans" who or Aboriginal to America predating Musa's visit?
@@emperoar-ressht-hruoraclet5389you might be indigenous american because only 14% of blacks came from slaves but your ancestral root's are ptahites or so called "africa"
If deep research is done, you will also know that the "Prophet" came from African Arabians situated in Yemen. His people or cultural group was called the Qureshi people.
Not sure how many of them today are actually still phenotypically African, but original Arabs or authentic Arabs were African people. Pale skin was a disgrace if you dig deep into further research. The reason was the Caucasians who had resentment against Africans or original Arabs, they were once slaves of there true Arabian masters. The Moors were known for enslaving Iranians, Iraqis and Turks into the salve markets of North Africa(Egypt). The Moors also enslaved Europeans, so you can say the tables were turned around...Since these Caucasians people mix bred they are now called Arabs today. Interesting how life is...Great video!
Do you realize that you are spreading the much talked about Hamitic theory? A theory that claimed to attribute the origin of black civilizations to a group of "Caucasian blacks" who were "strategically" placed in important civilizations within Africa. Obviously, the groups that were used for these narratives were mainly Cushites (Ethiopian people) and Arabized blacks who often had nothing to do with the civilizations.
In the same West Africa that you speak so repulsively about, perished from the same theory; the Congo, Egypt, Kush and the great Swahili civilization also perished from this. I love how you speak so confidently about something that is obvious from miles away that you have not studied well. Don't you realize that you are spreading a European theory?
If the "proto-Bantu" were really like you say, most of the proto-Bantu populations would look physically like this, since you yourself say that the Zanj and West Africans did everything possible to look "whiter". Most of the "proto-Bantu" groups you mention do not fit into the pattern you yourself impose of "true Egyptians" who, by the way, were melanized and black like the groups currently living between Sudan and Egypt. They were more likely to be Nilotic and Nubian than Bantu.
And about the Tutsis, whom you insist so much on coining the Bantu culture, they are a mainly Nilotic and Cushitic group that came from Abyssinia (if I'm not mistaken, through the Arabs), who practiced intensive herding and who created their culture by taking the language and dance that was practiced (and still is) by the peoples who inhabited the region of Rwanda. I encourage you to look further into how the inequalities between the Twa and Hutu peoples that the Tutsis benefited from ended in genocide. Obviously the Tutsis were the perfect ethnic group to take all the credit from the "black and ragged people as you say" who lived there.
I am surprised that people have accepted that narrative so easily. You have clearly never been to West Africa and have been carried away by the European and Arab narrative of how many people there were viewed.
Thanks for watching and I believe you have misunderstood.
I am simply using primary sources to correct false information. I went into this open minded and ready for whatever result I would find and according to the people who knew them - the Zanj were a seafaring population who sailed to and fro West Africa.
I used primary sources not theories.
Something to think about as you read - What happened to the men of a population when they lost a war or invasion?
With regards to the Tusi you fail to take into account the violent raids, pillaging and genocides that resulted in a DNA shift - which resulted in the men from the invaded population being un-alived to a point that their haplogroup Y is now found in trace amounts and the women being abducted to assaulted and made to birth the assaulters children who carried the new halplogroup Y which gives the false result that the Tusi are Nilotic - they aren’t - we know this because they are part of the Nkhoya-Subiya people who fled south and some to the Gabon during these invasions.
My Grandmother’s family are from these populations - we were taught the stories and know them.
Their name is correctly spelled ’Tusi’ - which means ‘we, the paramount’.
There seem to have been non-White people living outside Africa too - the same way the populations in Papua New Guinea or the Andaman Islands are not African but would be said to have an ‘African Phenotype’. Still figuring this out.
I am simply following linguistics, ethnology and DNA to accurately have African History so that everyone’s story can be heard - everyone.
The DNA of the Zanj supports my linguistic and ethnological findings.
E1b1b haplogroup Y is shared by the Maasai and other West African populations which is odd and shouldn’t be the case - conventional history says these two never met - so how do the Maasai a Nilotic Group share paternal DNA said to be out of West Africa?
Theirs has multiple admixtures from four other paternal lineages - which means four distinct paternal lines were merged into this one - the frequencies can tell us who is most dominant and where they trace their origin - E1b1b is the most dominant in the Maasai - which says they have a high frequency of West African paternal DNA.
A3b2 - 27% - Nilotic Haplogroup [Dinka, Nuer, Shilluk, other Sudanese, Somali and the Oromo]
E1b1a1 - 12% - West African - Yoruba, Igbo, Mande, Wolof, Akan, BaKongo, Zulu, Xhosa, Shona
B-M60 - 8% - Mbuti, Biaka (Proto-Sudanic)
All these populations are concentrated in West Africa and Proto-Sudan and are the populations said to have been Zanj - the Zulu, Xhosa, Shona, Sotho were Zanj invaders in Southern Africa on the Proto-Bantu - we know this because of the presence of the Nilo-Saharan languages as a superstratum - showing this group dominated because their language is the dominant and the Proto-Bantu language became a substratum - showing this group was subjugated.
Linguistics allows us to tell the social relationships expressed in a population’s DNA.
Follow the movements of these groups and their linguistics like I did in my first video - your result is they are Zanj
The presence of this haplogroup Y diversity, their location and linguistics is evidence they are part of the Zanj which means ‘numerous people’ and their DNA is concentrated in West African - Sudan populations.
We know they are for certain through ethnology. Their spear and shield were adapted and used by Shaka - those were very specific designs and the length and style of their blade matches Shaka’s - Shaka was out of a population in Delagoa Bay which was under Muzimba who was a Zanj and a Portuguese mercenary - he helped the Portuguese defeat the Moonga(Proto-Bantu) at Sena-Tete and the Lupata mountain region.
He is likely the source of the Cheva(Chewa) language whose admixture is present in Zulu - Cheva(Chewa) is called Nyanja in Zambia and shouldn’t be present in Zulu - not according to modern explanation of African History - but it is and Cheva has Somali admixture - still tracing all it’s admixtures
The Proto-Bantu male haplogroup Y is now present in small frequencies because most were un-alived by the invaders. The women were spared and abducted - this is evident in the language shift. Theirs seems to have been haplogroup E1b1b which is found across all the populations invaded by the Zanj in trace amounts.
I primarily use linguistics which is easily mapped to ethnology and these findings can be supported by DNA.
Because DNA can be mapped to language, language can be mapped to ethnology which is how I get my results - you’ve to tell the story of the DNA not just take it at face value and this story is told through the language patterns.
African History is vast, it will be uncomfortable for a lot of people because their narrative isn't true -we've always known this about all of you - it's time you knew it about yourselves - the ignorance is why the continent is so messed up.
I'd stop using the term Cushitic - the language spoken by the Kasha(Ksh) the Meroitic Script was related to the Proto-Bantu -
Current populations who claim to be Cushitic have no idea what the scripts say when they ought to know - but we who speak the Proto-Bantu language do - so I hope you can see the constant misappropriation of their culture which has led to your own erroneous conclusions - the Kushites were invaded by a Nilo-Saharan population just like the Proto-Bantu in Southern Africa but they were originally Proto-Bantu.
The surviving Proto-Bantu Women refused to teach the invaders children. There is a Southern African proverb that goes -
'A man can tie but cannot tame a Leopard.'
As for the Hamatic Theory - I don't know about that - but I can tell you it's not Ham but Hn - add the missing vowels - Hana
Hana is a Proto-Bantu title that means majesty - Ancient Egypt, at least the Proto-Bantu related one fell in 342* BCE so whatever came after wasn't them.
African History is more interesting without the lies - we haven't even talked about the other hominids admixtures 😂 Homo heidelbergensis, Homo Naledi, the Ghost Populations 😂this will be a mess - I think we deserve to know it
@@inyenyenzi, You just confirmed that you are ignorant. I encourage you to watch the videos on this guy's channel who explains in detail and with REAL PROOF the origin of the Egyptian civilization and DNA in Africa: www.youtube.com/@AbovetheClouds-en4il/videos
about Swahili Civilization: ruclips.net/video/-07ZNkvqjDs/видео.html&ab_channel=GreshamCollege
1. The Zanj are a group originating from the Great Lakes in Africa, not from West Africa. If you search on the internet, no one relates these two peoples.
2. The dominant gene among the Bantu and West African population is E1B1A, not E1B1B (this is typical of the Cushite peoples and some Arab and Nilotic peoples). In fact, the E halogroup was born in East Africa.
3. The Egyptian people were not even light-skinned, they are dark like their descendants in Sudan; They had woolly hair and wide noses, why do you think most statues have cut lips and noses? Literally a quick search of non-Arab Nubians will show you the real Egyptian people.
4. The Tutsis are a combination of Cushites, Nilotics and Bantu, in fact it is from the Nilotic people that they adopted the culture of herding and cow worship, which also relates them to the Cushites (who are said to be a crossbreeding of proto-Nilotics and Eurasians).
5. The black peoples outside of Africa are part of the first groups that left Africa, they are not a population that left recently. They have been away for thousands of years.
6. Those who invaded Kush were not Nilo-Saharan people, because Kush were Nilo-Saharan people (does the NILE ring a bell?); Furthermore, it is assumed that it was the Axum Empire that invaded Kush (your proto-Bantu people).
Much of what you are saying is unsubstantiated and not supported by archeological and genetic study. And you dont provide any sources other than your grandmother.
The sources are in the description box - and we are yet to get to the Jaggas/Chaggas, Gallas, Chikundas, Muzimbas, Bergenaar Bastards, Griqua, Kazembe - Africa has a history which still influences the outcomes we see today.
The abductions were experienced by my Grandmother's paternal Grandmother fortunately for her, she was married off to one of the Nkhoya Vassals at the time because 'she'd have made a difficult wife for the rest of them' - so there is your primary source - and also my Grandmothers were the Cultural Custodians and the other was an Oracle - that's who since you are unfamiliar with Proto-Bantu culture - know the history and tell it - like the Griots do in Mali - do you want it to come from a European book?
And all you've to do is find a documentary or better yet go to Rwanda and interview the Tusi women who survived that genocide - they are still living.
I will create a video where I cover how the Subiya Women were abducted so the children of the abductees could be taller and have lighter skin- since the Subiya were tall women with that coffee-milk skintone and the people that abducted them felt in need of those features - so they often had to bend their necks to look up at them - there are songs about it. My Grandmother's maternal Grandmother was Subiya - they lived this reality.
I will say this in a way you will understand because you are so accustomed to getting your history from a a colonial European source - who do you think were their primary sources - well mostly Africans who weren't the cultural custodians which is why they got so much wrong - but here's your genetic evidence.
"Your genetic evidence is the presence of the 'negro-look' so far away from 'negro-land' which is they called "West African Sudan-Upper & Lower Guinea region" - pull a map from the 1800s - did I say that ugly enough for you?
Just because you don't know your history doesn't mean everybody else doesn't. I grew up close to my Grandmothers and Grandfathers and I was taught - since what was written was looted or erased - did you know there is an Obelisk at Port Elizabeth and it once had painted hieroglyphs but those are all gone now?
Decolonize your mind and stop excepting Europeans to write your history before you can believe it - that's just messed up. Get a self-esteem.
Your comment irked me - don't insult my Grandmothers - they were highly intelligent and respected women - and better me than them to tell it - I have sanitized it.
She quotes alot of writing but wrtings too do not make absolete truth
@@inyenyenzi, You talk about decolonizing your mind, but you keep propagating Hamitic theory and European writers. And there are coffee-and-milk tones among the most isolated groups in Africa. If they had the appearance you say, a large part of their population would still maintain it. The only group that has been praised for its features are the Abyssinian groups in Ethiopia (and that's despite the fact that the Europeans kept emphasizing that they had very dark skin).
@@inyenyenzi Around 1442, the Portuguese first arrived in Southern Africa while trying to find a sea route to India. The term negro, literally meaning 'black', was used by the Spanish and Portuguese as a simple description to refer to the Bantu peoples that they encountered.
@@inyenyenzi The term negro means the color black in Spanish and Portuguese (from Latin niger), where English took it from.
I have to watch this a few times, it left me confused, but only because I've never heard this before, if I go off and study, blanks will be filled in. But wiki has Zanj for Southeast Africa, the Swahili Coast or is that another Zanj? A part of Africa's problem clearly was cooperating with Arabs, and accepting the western terms and definitions. Africa seems to have embraced the term Bantu. Bantu came from Wilhelm Bleek, how can a German come in Africa and classify a whole continent languages, he so would have got so much wrong, ignored many and made a lot of mistakes. Quite frankly, black Africans shouldn't want to marry Abyssinationate people, that would be you injecting Arab in your blood and further Arabanising Africa.
Thanks for watching. Part Two will tie it all together because I use the sources to show the Zanj's location/origin.
I agree the meaning of the expression Bantu was misunderstood and misused.
Bantu is our expression - it is part of our language but what Bleek did was define everyone who spoke a derivative of our language as Bantu - now this is like finding everyone who speaks English as saying they are English - it erases alot - which is what happened.
Bantu was never used to define everyone, just the Proto-Bantu - it means 'without a doubt we are the ideal manifestation of the ancient guardians' - it never means 'people' - we don't really have a word for people - 'sa' means familiars - 'ntu' means 'undoubtedly us/we' - we are very specific and call others by their 'tribe' name. Which is why 'Bantu' is not applied to Europeans we say 'Makuwa' or 'Ma French' or 'Ma Germans' just like before 1870, it was 'Ma Tebele', 'Ma ntati' or 'Ma Shona'.
As for the Phenotypes - I am doing my best to help people understand that Africans had many Phenotypes and not just the current Delta-Cameroon-Congolese Phenotype. Like the San most people had distinct Phenotypes and that doesn't mean they were mixed.
It just means the place they lived for thousands of years was further from the sun and they are still African.
Arabization gives an undertone that is different from the African undertone of the same hue - some people in Congo have it and it is different from the San or Proto-Bantu undertone - it is much similar to the Somali undertone. I talk about skin-tones because it is an underlying problem in Africa that we need to understand and figure out.
@@inyenyenzi Thanks for the reply, food for thought, and I will be looking forward to part 2, and slowly will be going through all your videos. The King's Monologue recommended your channel to us.
This is a bunch of malarkey. As an Asante i don,t know any africans except psychologically damaged ones who goes out of their way to marry an abyssinian looking african. We consider their genealogy suspect as they are not pure africans . Most of the people living in the horn were not the original population 3,000 years ago but resulted failed invasions of that area by Anatolian invaders in which the invading men were killed and their women were taken as wives. We do not like non-african blood in our lineage.
Invaders don’t usually bring women along with them though. I expected you to say the invaders took women from the areas they invaded.
Excellent point!@@Ntuthu-ZA
@@hughmaseko9780 Weird.
@@maxwell6525 it’s like a mockery on negroid features just because they are original and not mixed with any entities….and be called scary just coz of their broad nose and big lips
Well said😤
Azanians?
The Zanj seem to have been west of Proto-Sudan(West African Sudan) - were seafaring people and had control of the West Coast of Africa - they may have integrated and mixed
@@inyenyenzi You are very informed and measured in your analysis. I appreciate this.
Islam is rife with racist Medes, & Persians like the Quraish, not an Arabic tribe.
This Book has to be read by all blacks Africans. With expedience.
Zanj/Shenzi/Chwezi the Abachwezi are not invaders the bachwezi is a bantu priestly empire of Kingdoms. The Arabs didnt pronounce Chwezi they started mispronounciation
I added the primary sources to the description box- read through them when you can - did the Chwezi live near the Senegambian River? Where they Seafaring People? - the last time I made a video of the Zanj no one seemed to want to claim them.
The sources show the first Zanj in Proto-Bantu territory invaded at what would become Sofala - creating the Sotho speaking people in 900CE/AD.
Prior to this, there currently no Zanj anywhere in Proto-Bantu(East to Southern Africa) or Abyssinian territory.
So the Chwezi may have been another group of Zanj who invaded Proto-Bantu territory after 1000 CE/AD - this might be the same group that would later invade Great Zimbabwe with Shangambire?(that's a thought not a fact)
If the Chwezi are the Zanj, then their language should have fragments of their history. I will look into it.
I am Kenyan. And. I know. Dr Kraft. The missionary. Found. Numerous. People. In the. Coast. Called. Khavi. . who. We're. Sometimes. Captured. By. Arabs. Both. Black and. White. Remember. The. White..red Arabs. Troglodytes. Are. From. Arabia .. the. Black. Nilosemetics. Came. From west Africa. And. Invaded.they. We're. Talk. And. Dark. Compared. To. The short. Ivory. Natives.
@@inyenyenzi the Chwezi are linked to the Mountains of the moon priestly class they are not invaders. Chwezi can be linked with Bunyoro Kitara and Busongora whose history goes for more than 20,000 yrs. It was an empire that cpvered a vast territory. Maybe the invasion of of Sofala was due to the gold which people like the Lemba clearly tell they came from Yemen to the region to look fpr gold. Chwezi themselves are not invaders I am one of those from the Chwezi
@@cleophaskubasu Is this related to Monoemugi ? Reading books from the 14th century the portugese describe Monoemugi as an empire that controlled the great lakes of Africa and the port cities of the zanji coast were apart of its domain .
Also I would like to know the relation between Monomotapa and Monoemugi are these two empire related to each other ?
@@cleophaskubasuThank you . I do see nothing under the Sun is more compromised than history becauase everyone can read a book and reference it and present it for truth.
What makes these tellers think what they read in a book is absolete truth.
The Zenj were not invaders .
Could one of the historians yu are talking about be Ibn Khaldoun? The other point is that it's the Tutsi-Hema who were trying to create an Empire around the time of the genocide. Other than that I don't know a great deal of history of Fulani, Arabs, etc. like others here. But I do believe Arabs were black. I took interest in this channel because I knew for sure Bantu seems like a school word, not used colloquially except for all that foreign (South African) stuff about uBuntu etc. And many people called Bantu don't refer to themselves as that. It will be interesting to see the logical end. This time I was starting to drift off again until yu reminded of your roots in the comments. What have Zanj to do with the fez wearing(?) Kings African Rifles if some of the invaders to the south were mercenaries. All the while African people on y-t seem to be expounding on and celebrating histories like Mzilikazi. Have yu noticed?
It sounds like you are describing azande groups but i dont think they do teeth sharpening. They are Ubangian not 'Nilo-Saharan' (nilo-saharan is also not a language family). And they must have come into contact with Arabs since they are right next to So. Sudan. One of their names is Niam-Niam which ibn khaldun targeted in his racist bouts. Arabs called them nyam-nyams and hated them, so name fits.
Azande seems to have some cultural input on kongo culture and through linguistics Im sure anyone can see that the northern most bantu are not bantu. They adopted the language and weakened the pronounciation.
So I guess here (The Azande .... The Zanji) is who you are refering to as Zanj?
Thanks for watching - I will do a linguistic comparison of the Azande language - the Zanj were a dominant force who seem to have been larger in stature too and they lived closer to the West African coast (I explain this in part 2) - they were frightening when they needed to be and definitely a seafaring when in Africa but adapted to the desert too - primary sources show they had their own language too - still finding it - could be part of Umayyad or Abbasid Arabic because they did influence the region and culture - so naturally fragments of their language will be in those iterations of Arabic.
Southern African Linguistics shows that the Zanj who invaded that region at Sofala were a Nilo-Saharan population - this Linguistic modification is also present in East Africa - the Proto-Sudan populations rarely added their languages to the derived Bantu Languages unless they were closer to the Proto-Sudan region - but beyond that they seem to have adopted a language from the Nilo-Saharan languages that mixed with the Proto-Bantu which points to subjugation and why most of them lost their origins.
I am still verifying this, but it seems as if the dominant population brought with them a subjugated population when they invade Proto-Bantu territory and the answer to this might be in the Sofala area.
I am looking into the language patterns - Southern Nguni languages do carry the Chewa/Nyanja admixture and this comes out of Maravi/Malawi - who may have a link to the Galla and Jagga/Chagga
I call them 'Nilo-Saharan and West African Sudanic People - since the first Sudan extended across from the Senegambia river to Berberian country - which is modern day Libya - I will cover this in part two.
The Proto-Sudan population like the Nilo-Saharans had many ethnic groups.
Since they neighbored one another, it stands to reason these two populations interacted so the Zanj were a mixed from these regions.
I use Nilo-Saharan as a regional definition not as a name of a tribe but a people from that region.
@inyenyenzi ah, okay. A lot of So. Bantu socio-political stuff i need to catch up on.
If you need a high quality linguistics tool for mapping bantus, there is a book "a comparative study of bantu and semi-bantu" Johnston 1919 (possibly the most comprehensive data sets on bantu lexical items). In it I believe it does show nguni as having 'nilo-saharan' roots indicative of a substratum. Xhosa also have a high quantity of E2, i believe, which is highly correlated with Nilotes, but not all Nilotes have it. (i think its found densely in the congo, i haven't felt a need to study this Y-group so im just giving anecdotal-like thoughts here).
I hope you remember that DNA tribes study on ;k.n.jtn where great lakes and nguni came up. Im pretty sure those where nilote genetics, making him a nilote like those in the rwanda and nguni bantu linguistics zones.
@@inyenyenzi The galla are an East african people not Nilo-Saharan and have a reputation for being extremely fierce they would have been the source for the jagga/chagga. Furthermore the Fulani are the people in west africa that best meet your criteria as they are spread across the Sahel from east to west africa and have a reputation .
@@maxwell6525Fula dont do teeth sharpening tho? Its not them, they also never went south of the equator.
If i understand the history right, they have to be someone in the Kongo who had contact with arabs, who assimilated into nilote society, then assaulted zambia-zimbabwe, and remained.
Present day Ethiopia is populated presently by SEMITES-Aramaic{Amharic}, & Assÿri-Tigris, Beta-Israel.
The Prophet pbuh and companions were black people. See recent movie Lady of Heavens from UK, companions were depicted as black, original arabs were black people from Yemen and East Africa. There nothing such as white arab, they descendants of Romans Greeks Turks and Persians.
No
@shafsteryellow yes
@@mujtab304 don’t lie buddy it’s not good
@@shafsteryellow bring your évidences if you have,just one. You are a Jahil( worst type of ignorant). I will be waiting for your answer.
This woman does get some of her information wrong especially when it comes to Southern bantu of Great Zimbabwe... It is very sinister and divisive.
This information is taken directly from primary sources(posted in the description box - don't forget to toss a coin) and critical thinking. Ignorance is a terrible friend.
And...
This Woman's Grandmother was the Proto-Bantu cultural custodian, oracle and rainmaker.
If you feel this is sinister & divisive wait till we get to Kuitebe(Quitebe) the Shona Capital - which means the place of debauchery - while under Shona control - it's an ugly mess - since you want to own the Siambwe(it's not Zimbabwe - doesn't mean stone house)
Prior to the 1900s, the Shona were afraid of going near those stone ruins, they would report to the European Settlers whenever they heard voices - which is how the portal keys were collected & taken to private collections and waygates buried under water.
It was the Shona who snitched on the location of the Ndebele Inganga - who was target in the mountains and unalived before the European Settlers could win that war against the Ndebele over the stolen Matebeland.
We aren't going to be misrepresented or misappropriated ever again.
Jamana.
It’s intentional
@@jesselongbottom1088 The primary sources are available in the description box - not my fault the world wasn't unicorns and rainbows - remember to toss a coin & support this work.
@@inyenyenzi oh dear 😑 you still continue to spew incorrect information and the worst part is none of the Shona groups were even asked to verify this! Siambwe means absolutely nothing and yet we have Venda people in South Africa who have been supporting or agreeing the BaNyai Narrative which you do not happen to mention here, which further proves you're a fraud with an imaginary bone to pick with the so-called Shona!! Zimbabwe is in its mess because of Zanu not shona people. Zanu has Sotho ppl, Ndebele pp and Venda too! In another videk you mentioned about a lie that Shonas hate Tongas and most Shona ppl will even testify they have never met any Tongas in their life and what would it be that makes shonas hate Tongas? You are not normal
@@jesselongbottom1088 it is and she is lying. I challenge her to a live
Hmmmmmm
😂 The next video gives the location - I also included the primary sources in the description box