Some quick notes on the missile modes: - In elevated mode, you should keep the reticle on the target and not worry, as the missile will descend to the correct spot automatically when it gets near the target. (Of course, this requires that you lase the target before firing so it knows when to do this.) - Emergency mode requires a range under 1000, so it didn't actually trigger in this clip.
my main gripe with the game currently is the AI's behaviour either inhumane reaction times and dead on accuracy through bushes and most importantly through gun smoke and also through smoke screen to sometimes taking up to 30 seconds to notice you when you're sitting in front of them I hope they can fix these issues some day
Yeah it feels like I only get like half an hour of gameplay a month with the new scenarios :/ Most of the fun and enjoyment I get is from the Dev streams talking about the development work itself lol 😅
Which is hilarious because 1) these simpletons can't read (roadmap) or 2) just plain ignorant -- or a combination of the two. They'd get it -- then be on to crying about other aspects of an unfinished game.
Wonder if we are going to see any different variants of the T series tanks for that time period. Would love to see the 64bv as it entered service in 85’.
They seem to have a standard that it needs to be in service, not merely introduced or testing around 1985. They also want specific to this region of Germany, so you're not going to see Naval infantry with upgraded T-55s or domestic variants from Warsaw Pact States further south like Romania. Though I know some modders have been able to introduce reactive armor boxes.
Definitely time for some more NATO vehicles. I’m really looking forward to having infantry added to give the BMPs and Bradley’s more of a role; as well as artillery
@@Tamburello_1994 when a game is in early access that means you get a game with limited content. Not a simulator of a loading screen. I swear to god, with the amounts the game crashed or had me to go to the main menu this is literally what I got. Mind you, I did not write about the lack of content, the poor optimization, dumb AI for both sides and other gripes i have with the game. I am completely fine with games in ea, but. But when the fucking movement in the game behaves like this, well, then i may not have any expectations indeed, for the final release that is. PS. It's not like i didn't like the game or hating on the developer (I believe its a single person?). It was very much enjoyable for most of the time. But c'mon, when the thing that you are coding first when starting a game project fails so miserably, that you just can't leave behind.
@@Neukend The game is made by a a couple of people, but honestly I haven’t had any serious issues, and as someone said already it’s an EA game, broken stuff is to be expected. Had some optimization issues but some of the latest updates smoothed them out, loading times aren’t the best either but it is what it is. Seems like you’re a bit unlucky with the tank flipping thing, never had that happen out of the 180 hours I’ve played so far
They are explicitly avoiding all PvP for the forseeable future and for good reason. GHPC PvP would be bargain bin War Thunder and it'd be a total shitshow, PvP is both insanely hard to balance and breeds toxicity more often than not, so it's safer for a passion project like this to stick to PvE. Plus PvE allows for more engaging scenarios that are simultaneously more realistic, which is half the selling point of the game.
@@bluntcabbage6042 It could be managed by the community and not the devs themselves. GHPC devs would just have to release the tools to hosts the servers and what not but, I think the game is pretty balanced all things considered. The T-64B and T-80B can stand their ground against the Abrams, and soon we are gonna have West Germany in the game, so it's incredible exciting. War Thunder is in such a sorry state that I stopped playing altogether, this game it's miles ahead of WT already.
@@RealOny The money and man hours to just set up the servers and infrastructure - let alone managing it, which they absolutely _would_ have to do because they are the ones paying to run the multiplayer and community management would likely suck ass - would take away resources from the much more important PvE work they're doing. War Thunder is in a sorry state, absolutely. And it's a recurring theme that PvP tank games will inevitably also be in a sorry state with enough time. Going PvP is just a massive headache that carries _far_ more risk than any benefit it could render. We already have PvP tank games, even if War Thunder is deeply flawed, while we have few to no proper tank PvE games. One niche needs more attention than the other by a long shot. And like I said, dedicating to PvE enables a lot more interesting scenarios that would be both more fun and more realistic, whereas PvP tank games always have to make stupidly unrealistic compromises just to make the PvP playable. Properly asymmetric scenarios, for example, almost always fall flat on their face in PvP but can thrive in PvE as well as any kind of massive simulated operations with many moving parts, it tends to be far easier in a PvE setting.
Absolutely not. The M1IP can still knock out those newer Soviet tanks, but I guess this game can't satisfy everyone and your comment won't be the first or last, even before the introduction to the Soviet Forces, it was called US biased/NATO. Whatever man. 🙄
Are you not a native English speaker? You mispronounced Joust and Cobra just within the first 2 minutes as well as your overall speech sounding very mouth closed and not natural considering you have a written script (also obvious in speech patterns). Maybe you should wing it a bit more to come off natural more and take some time on harder words if you aren't familiar with them.
Some quick notes on the missile modes:
- In elevated mode, you should keep the reticle on the target and not worry, as the missile will descend to the correct spot automatically when it gets near the target. (Of course, this requires that you lase the target before firing so it knows when to do this.)
- Emergency mode requires a range under 1000, so it didn't actually trigger in this clip.
Ah, so set the range to 900 meters instead of just 1000?
@@PhanPhantasy I recommend setting it to zero with Ctrl+PgDown
@@PhanPhantasy I would say set it to zero using the range reset keybind
@@ActionScripter I see! Good clarification!
my main gripe with the game currently is the AI's behaviour
either inhumane reaction times and dead on accuracy through bushes and most importantly through gun smoke and also through smoke screen
to sometimes taking up to 30 seconds to notice you when you're sitting in front of them
I hope they can fix these issues some day
I don't think that's a dev priority atm -- as I'm sure they are aware of the game's flaws. Right now, it's all about building the framework.
i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.
@@jmgonzales7701 infantry is coming eventually though i think it's farther in the roadmap
@@kazakhstanisastate4614 thats sweet, where i can see the road map?
I really wish we could get some focus on the campaign next. GHPC has a lot going for it right now but we just need reasons to keep playing.
You're getting this much out of a HALF-BAKED game -- imagine the fun you'll have when it's actually COMPLETED.
@@Tamburello_1994 yeah the fun you will have in 2030
Yeah it feels like I only get like half an hour of gameplay a month with the new scenarios :/
Most of the fun and enjoyment I get is from the Dev streams talking about the development work itself lol 😅
roadmap
I lost my faith in that tbh i think we need our own mission editor. The missions the devs put out are far to simple
let me know your thoughts on this May Update!! 😀
(also close to 9K, subscribe if you haven't already let's go!)
Best update so far you can realy see the progress they making now
Good stuff. This developer is working hard.
Thanks for the update! This game keeps improving at a good steady rate very cool!
Man I been waiting for the MCLOS to be implemented. Finally it’s realistic for the early missile
Thanks for the heads up
I really hope they add other NATO tanks in as-well in the future. Mostly leo's tho 😅
Would be cool to get the BAOR (British Army of the Rhine) and get the Chieftain and Challenger 1.
leopard 2a4 is 100% coming to the game 2a5 isnt tho
@@Rimasta1if I am not mistaking French and British are not coming to Fulda 1985 Scenario but they said they might come to other planned scenarios
@@_XKX_ not 2a4 it wasnt introduced at that time in 1985, the newest one available was the 2a3 or earlier version like the 2a2, 2a1 etc
@@_XKX_ no leo2a4s coming. They are a 1985 introduction, we wont get them the same way we arent geting kontakt 1
We need this game in COOP/multiplayer.
we need the game to be finished.
@Tamburello_1994 the amount of comments i've seen about how "this game needs coop/mp" is too many. 😂
Which is hilarious because 1) these simpletons can't read (roadmap) or 2) just plain ignorant -- or a combination of the two.
They'd get it -- then be on to crying about other aspects of an unfinished game.
I love me some 1:19 "Kurwa" guided Missiles XD
Love the camo netting❤
Wonder if we are going to see any different variants of the T series tanks for that time period. Would love to see the 64bv as it entered service in 85’.
They seem to have a standard that it needs to be in service, not merely introduced or testing around 1985. They also want specific to this region of Germany, so you're not going to see Naval infantry with upgraded T-55s or domestic variants from Warsaw Pact States further south like Romania. Though I know some modders have been able to introduce reactive armor boxes.
They were introduced in 85’ but realistically wouldn’t have been in the Fulda Gap yet
I do not understand English.
How do you apply camouflage?
It's randomly selected like the luggage on all the vehicles
There's is no way to pick it right know
And I don't see that changing at least for know
Can't pick camo netting, it is random.
I understood. Thank you！
Just noticed crew ruck sacks on the M1 update.
Definitely time for some more NATO vehicles. I’m really looking forward to having infantry added to give the BMPs and Bradley’s more of a role; as well as artillery
this on console would rock
Need the troops bad!
Soon!
i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.
@@PhanPhantasy i want a game as immersive as this but with infantry as well.
I'm waiting for Leopard 2 PzBtl 123 (4) to appear in the game.
Any urban warfare? it looks like it's all in the countryside.
It's Fulda gap in Germany. So not really. Just small towns and open fields.
I stopped playing GHPC primarily because 3 missions in a row some of my tanks flipped. You are lucky if it doesnt happen often to you.
Happens probably because your tracks collide with certain objects
@@FujiLeeTheAmerican a tank under my control flipped only once, all the other times that were bots, wich is even more frustrating
@@Neukend I guess you as well missed the "work in progress" disclaimer.
Early access means no expectations.
@@Tamburello_1994 when a game is in early access that means you get a game with limited content. Not a simulator of a loading screen. I swear to god, with the amounts the game crashed or had me to go to the main menu this is literally what I got.
Mind you, I did not write about the lack of content, the poor optimization, dumb AI for both sides and other gripes i have with the game. I am completely fine with games in ea, but. But when the fucking movement in the game behaves like this, well, then i may not have any expectations indeed, for the final release that is.
PS. It's not like i didn't like the game or hating on the developer (I believe its a single person?). It was very much enjoyable for most of the time. But c'mon, when the thing that you are coding first when starting a game project fails so miserably, that you just can't leave behind.
@@Neukend The game is made by a a couple of people, but honestly I haven’t had any serious issues, and as someone said already it’s an EA game, broken stuff is to be expected. Had some optimization issues but some of the latest updates smoothed them out, loading times aren’t the best either but it is what it is.
Seems like you’re a bit unlucky with the tank flipping thing, never had that happen out of the 180 hours I’ve played so far
still waiting for coop ;)
yes
Is this a multiplayer game?
free to play ?
No Multiplayer/co-op yet.
And no, this is not free to play.
This game needs coop and multiplayer PvP and it will be fire.
They are explicitly avoiding all PvP for the forseeable future and for good reason. GHPC PvP would be bargain bin War Thunder and it'd be a total shitshow, PvP is both insanely hard to balance and breeds toxicity more often than not, so it's safer for a passion project like this to stick to PvE. Plus PvE allows for more engaging scenarios that are simultaneously more realistic, which is half the selling point of the game.
@@bluntcabbage6042 It could be managed by the community and not the devs themselves. GHPC devs would just have to release the tools to hosts the servers and what not but, I think the game is pretty balanced all things considered. The T-64B and T-80B can stand their ground against the Abrams, and soon we are gonna have West Germany in the game, so it's incredible exciting.
War Thunder is in such a sorry state that I stopped playing altogether, this game it's miles ahead of WT already.
@@RealOny The money and man hours to just set up the servers and infrastructure - let alone managing it, which they absolutely _would_ have to do because they are the ones paying to run the multiplayer and community management would likely suck ass - would take away resources from the much more important PvE work they're doing.
War Thunder is in a sorry state, absolutely. And it's a recurring theme that PvP tank games will inevitably also be in a sorry state with enough time. Going PvP is just a massive headache that carries _far_ more risk than any benefit it could render. We already have PvP tank games, even if War Thunder is deeply flawed, while we have few to no proper tank PvE games. One niche needs more attention than the other by a long shot.
And like I said, dedicating to PvE enables a lot more interesting scenarios that would be both more fun and more realistic, whereas PvP tank games always have to make stupidly unrealistic compromises just to make the PvP playable. Properly asymmetric scenarios, for example, almost always fall flat on their face in PvP but can thrive in PvE as well as any kind of massive simulated operations with many moving parts, it tends to be far easier in a PvE setting.
I only want terrain destruction and co-op... 🥺
not everything revolves about co-op ok?
@@islamicstateofukraine yeah ok, and how about just accepting a different opinion than yours, ok?
i just want infantry to be added, so missions are much more realistic (and interesting)
@@islamicstateofukraineCo-op is on the roadmap lol
@@matthewjones39 its better for them to finish it fully, then add co op, id rather have the BDR added and other features like infantry.
Still no Bundeswehr ? NO THANKS
Dude chill. It's coming.
Really sad that this game is becoming another pact masturbatory fest like war thunder. 3BM32 wasn't even issued until 1987.
Absolutely not. The M1IP can still knock out those newer Soviet tanks, but I guess this game can't satisfy everyone and your comment won't be the first or last, even before the introduction to the Soviet Forces, it was called US biased/NATO. Whatever man. 🙄
Citation needed please.
3VBM13/3BM32/33 (3BM32 "Vant") Entered service in 1985.
Ay lets gooo
Are you not a native English speaker? You mispronounced Joust and Cobra just within the first 2 minutes as well as your overall speech sounding very mouth closed and not natural considering you have a written script (also obvious in speech patterns). Maybe you should wing it a bit more to come off natural more and take some time on harder words if you aren't familiar with them.