There's a MASSIVE difference between BF4 vehicles you didn't know about - Battlefield 4

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 10 дек 2024

Комментарии • 230

  • @DANNYonPC
    @DANNYonPC  Год назад +21

    i might have taken a bit longer than expected with this video
    Hieb's link twitter.com/HiebDE

  • @Yoda_16358
    @Yoda_16358 3 месяца назад +803

    I prefer vehicle differences, gives each faction some uniqueness. Just like how the spawns aren’t equally favored (though maybe some ticket compensation would be nice there)

    • @luckassturion5200
      @luckassturion5200 2 месяца назад

      No batlefield não existe diferença reais , só diferenças de tamanhos

    • @alexshpak1497
      @alexshpak1497 2 месяца назад +34

      Battlefield 3 actually had more of this, it's one of the things that I think made bf3 the best one

    • @Yoda_16358
      @Yoda_16358 2 месяца назад +13

      @@alexshpak1497 Yeah it was a little more different, I think 5 had the most differences though. Each faction had a completely different selection of vehicles, and I thought that was really nice.

    • @costatitan8458
      @costatitan8458 Месяц назад +5

      This is the way it was, bf1942, vietnam and beloved bf2 for sure. I miss those times

    • @ProLapsRacing
      @ProLapsRacing Месяц назад +19

      @@alexshpak1497Also didn’t 3 make US use like M16/M4/IAR/Mk11 and RU use 74M/74SU/RPK/SVD locked as the first weapons? I would actually love to see team locked weapons again lol, even if it’s just for like a specific hardcore mode

  • @mrCeal
    @mrCeal Год назад +626

    I'd much rather play with small vehicle imbalances than the clone wars of 2042 and BF4 nowadays. This stuff only matters for high level comp play and shouldn't affect the average player.

    • @rbvtdmcp646
      @rbvtdmcp646 5 месяцев назад +74

      Doesn’t even matter for comp because they always play 2 rounds of the map. If anything it makes things more interesting and nuanced.

    • @novkorova2774
      @novkorova2774 Месяц назад +6

      The b1 system works good. Otherwise rounds need to have faction changing or the map be specific to each and asymetrical.

    • @Pepe-pq3om
      @Pepe-pq3om Месяц назад +19

      Gamers will always optimize the fun out off games trying to have an edge on competition

    • @smoltank4648
      @smoltank4648 Месяц назад

      ​@@Pepe-pq3om competitive players are a very fringe minority that shouldn't be catered to tbh

  • @darthveda
    @darthveda Год назад +629

    This is why a lot of servers play US-US, to bore us all with monotony of EXACT BALANCE

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +15

      good :p

    • @moweewesty279
      @moweewesty279 7 месяцев назад +23

      THAT'S WHY THE PKP IS THE BEST LMG IN BF4

    • @RipVanWhinkle
      @RipVanWhinkle 2 месяца назад +60

      ​@DANNYonPC no not good, I actually dislike it a lot. I like having to change how I play based on what I have, rather than everything being the same

    • @elster333
      @elster333 2 месяца назад

      @@RipVanWhinklethats stupid though since the z11w sucks compared to the little bird so ur just worse if ur ru/cn

    • @viktormilosevic8172
      @viktormilosevic8172 2 месяца назад +18

      There is like 1 server and its the lamest cesspit of tryhards

  • @refoliation
    @refoliation 2 месяца назад +143

    I do like to hear the infantry callouts in different languages. Often it’s a sure sign an enemy is nearby that you may not have noticed otherwise. And it can make the process of hunting rats that are burrowed into your flags less tedious. I’m not much of a vehicle player though.

  • @CogumeloLokaco
    @CogumeloLokaco Год назад +119

    BTR-90 have less height, so you can enter tiny spaces where LAV-25 or ZBD will stuck on the ceiling

    • @papaquebeck3353
      @papaquebeck3353 3 месяца назад +20

      I really missing Bradley and BMP2 at least bmp was in bf3, but haven't seen Bradley in bf since bc2

    • @hi-Larry-ous
      @hi-Larry-ous 2 месяца назад +5

      ​@@papaquebeck3353The US faction is represented by the marines in recent BF titles, so there won't be a Bradley till they use the army to represent the US

  • @169abr
    @169abr Год назад +327

    I knew it was going to be an annoying round when I saw US v US on Littlebird Maps.

    • @Ungovernable_Schizo
      @Ungovernable_Schizo 8 месяцев назад +6

      thats why you become a god with tow missiles

    • @eduardobreda1279
      @eduardobreda1279 3 месяца назад

      @@Ungovernable_Schizohow tf do uou know how far it is

    • @Ungovernable_Schizo
      @Ungovernable_Schizo 3 месяца назад

      @@eduardobreda1279 keep your eyes on the missile, lead with the missile, not your cross errors , it has a range of 700 meters

    • @xloltimex38
      @xloltimex38 2 месяца назад

      ​@@eduardobreda1279 experience man. Just experience one of the most rewarding weapons if you master it. Loved it. So fun on the viper

  • @thestørmcrier2024
    @thestørmcrier2024 Год назад +151

    Neat how real world features and designs of vehicles helps balance them against each other in addition with damage models and hp

    • @lyugui
      @lyugui Год назад +13

      its pretty stupid, imo for the sake of balancing, I think DICE should take some balancing and creative liberties to make the game a bit more even. Like, for example, adding the F22 instead of the F35 for a more comparable size and role as the other 2 (since the Su57 isnt really the counterpart to the F35 as much as it qas to the F22, and ik its not really in the USAF anymore) or like ghosting and/or expanding some vehicle parts and POVs as a balancing compromise.

    • @thestørmcrier2024
      @thestørmcrier2024 3 месяца назад +6

      @@lyuguifair enough man

    • @johnclay2716
      @johnclay2716 Месяц назад +2

      @@lyugui Cringe awful opinion

    • @lyugui
      @lyugui Месяц назад

      @@johnclay2716 you sound gay

    • @PedroKing19
      @PedroKing19 13 дней назад +1

      ​@@lyugui 64 players in a game. I don't really care for these small balancing issues. I prefer it if it's a little unbalanced

  • @LAV-25A2_56
    @LAV-25A2_56 Год назад +63

    So this was why I was good with the LAV on a round.

  • @msaeedazizi
    @msaeedazizi Год назад +122

    It's little balance shenanigans like this that create a near-timeless masterpiece of skill curve to overcome.
    GG, old DICE.

  • @weehoo2
    @weehoo2 5 месяцев назад +122

    Me and my homies hate US v US servers frfr

  • @imnotusingmyrealname4566
    @imnotusingmyrealname4566 Год назад +264

    The BTR-90 is actually better than the LAV-25. The turret is in the front meaning you can expose less of your vehicle.

    • @CptH0vvDy
      @CptH0vvDy Год назад +22

      He mentioned this exact point at 4:28

    • @MultiKbarry
      @MultiKbarry Месяц назад +4

      That doesn’t necessarily make it better though. It hurts situational awareness near the rear of the tank. Also the upside can be ignored by the other IFV with proper positioning.

    • @Jaegerfunky
      @Jaegerfunky Месяц назад +8

      @@MultiKbarry If you need to fight an enemy behind you, you really did something wrong.

    • @MultiKbarry
      @MultiKbarry Месяц назад +4

      @@Jaegerfunky This is a combined arms game. It is normal to have infantry flank around if you are supporting a push or holding ground.

    • @Jaegerfunky
      @Jaegerfunky Месяц назад +3

      @@MultiKbarry I'm aware, the mindset, is that if you are fighting an enemy behind you, you have done something wrong is STILL correct, no matter what side you are, yes flanking is correct, if you managed to flank an enemy without any issues its because the enemy has made a mistake, and vice versa.

  • @favclassisspy9478
    @favclassisspy9478 Год назад +137

    I like these little differences. Adds more flavour to the factions. PS: bring back factions DICE

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +4

      you know, the tanks are diff for example, same for the jets and AC130's

    • @JesusChrist-qs8sx
      @JesusChrist-qs8sx 3 месяца назад

      2042 and BF1 are the only that don't do factions I believe

    • @TheKusa5
      @TheKusa5 2 месяца назад +17

      @@JesusChrist-qs8sx Battlefield 1 absolutely has factions.

    • @longhairedDreadneck
      @longhairedDreadneck 2 месяца назад +1

      The next game is NATO vs PMC

  • @michaelpontifex6797
    @michaelpontifex6797 Год назад +51

    I thought F-35 being able to hover and BTR + RCB boat having turret at the front were only differences. I thought helis had different agility but I thought that was just me

  • @desreversti
    @desreversti Год назад +17

    Sumo wrestling is one of my favorite things to do with tanks. Didn't realize the advntage thay the Abrams has, but it makes sense.

  • @Zakhev342
    @Zakhev342 2 месяца назад +22

    Nothing takes me out of the immersion like US vs US servers.

  • @saladv6069
    @saladv6069 Год назад +36

    I think it would be better if the different faction vehicles were completely different, in handling and weapons and such. Keep it balanced by having the vehicles different enough to were one isn’t objectively better than its other faction counterpart.

    • @erikbruil4907
      @erikbruil4907 Год назад

      That would be such a pain in the ass to do

    • @nuggetsaltshaker9520
      @nuggetsaltshaker9520 Год назад +7

      ​@@erikbruil4907making a videogame is pretty hard, I'm sure they'd manage

    • @saladv6069
      @saladv6069 Год назад +2

      @@erikbruil4907 DICE wouldn’t be able to do it, that’s for sure.

    • @cjallenroxs6239
      @cjallenroxs6239 Год назад

      @@nuggetsaltshaker9520wow making it more difficult for them to develop but “they can manage”

  • @chaimkobylinski1988
    @chaimkobylinski1988 Год назад +75

    Short - it makes sense only in competitive match.
    BF is about larglely immersion and vehicles have to look and act different.

    • @Frank-qn7de
      @Frank-qn7de 2 месяца назад +6

      "BF is about larglely immersion and vehicles have to look and act different." its not funny how 2042 is so agaisnt this line of thinking

    • @chaimkobylinski1988
      @chaimkobylinski1988 2 месяца назад +2

      @@Frank-qn7de bf2042 is futuristic but it has almost 100% mirror balance. Except maps, those are never mirror. BfV was the most asymmetric balanced games out from all bfs. It mostly worked and was immersive as i.e Tiger is very powerful but slow and not very good against infantry. Shermans are fast and all rounders but usually fail facing 1v1 Tiger. On the other hand US has superior anti tank plane, but inferior fighter plane

    • @Frank-qn7de
      @Frank-qn7de 2 месяца назад +1

      @@chaimkobylinski1988 to me 2042 is too immersion breaking for many reasons, most are just aesthetics like dumb "near future" weaponry everywhere all times or the way soldiers look (forgot they are not soldiers anymore they are "specialists" :D) jarring voices, its disapointing how they missed the mark so bad when bf3 and bf4 did it flawlessly until laststand dlc

    • @chaimkobylinski1988
      @chaimkobylinski1988 2 месяца назад

      @@Frank-qn7de it's future, post apocalyptic world, i have my characters customized all with helmets and kevlar. It's at least possible. Weaponry are nothing impossible really, thighs that are or can't be soon available. Tbh i didn't like bf3 a esthetics first, and bf4 still doesn't really speak to me

    • @Raz_Tactical
      @Raz_Tactical 29 дней назад

      Who the hell plays competitive battlefield. It was never really a game designed for competitive play. It was designed for large scale combined arms objective gameplay.

  • @psimera-gaming
    @psimera-gaming 11 месяцев назад +6

    forgot to mention the difference in the exit point from the attack helicopter, which prevents you from dropping the spot or making a switch with a gunner on the havoc

  • @Stunlokked
    @Stunlokked Год назад +7

    im never going to stop playing this game.

  • @butterhead6333
    @butterhead6333 Год назад +30

    Battlefield 4 gameplay is till the king and all we really want is just an upgraded bf4😭😭

    • @nickbuckley4371
      @nickbuckley4371 5 месяцев назад +1

      With upgraded movement from bfv

    • @Phlostonparadise2971
      @Phlostonparadise2971 5 месяцев назад +3

      BF3*
      BF4 almost outdid it, most of a decade later.

    • @fr4nmo475
      @fr4nmo475 3 месяца назад

      @@Phlostonparadise2971 lol lackfield 3 (bad copy of 2)

    • @roskcity
      @roskcity 2 месяца назад +3

      ​@@nickbuckley4371nah bf5 felt like cod with the fast movement and sliding

    • @installshieldwizard3017
      @installshieldwizard3017 Месяц назад

      Bf3 the GOAT

  • @XWar_LockX
    @XWar_LockX Год назад +11

    This is the kind of information I have been DIEING to find! I would really like more hidden information like this about battlefield 4

  • @fatshpee7174
    @fatshpee7174 Год назад +8

    The mi-28 gunner also has a noticeably faster fire rate on the 30mm gun

    • @Hieb
      @Hieb Год назад +9

      It doesn't

    • @fatshpee7174
      @fatshpee7174 Год назад +6

      @@Hieb alright I see you BUT it sounds way cooler

    • @Hieb
      @Hieb Год назад +10

      @@fatshpee7174 now we are talking. :D

  • @TheoriginalBMT
    @TheoriginalBMT Год назад +10

    I'm all for unbalanced vehicles and factions. As long as the differences give unique advantages to the factions.

  • @MonaxNoire
    @MonaxNoire 5 месяцев назад +14

    Another reason the q5 is the best attack jet is because of its canopy. You can see more compared to the a10 and su25.
    The only advantage the j20 has is also its canopy is able to see much easier compared to the other two.
    Also he forgot to mention with the lavad you can travel on water much easier compared to the tunguska and type 95 aa

    • @hi-Larry-ous
      @hi-Larry-ous 2 месяца назад +1

      If I'm correct the RU and CN spaa aren't amphibious at all

    • @MonaxNoire
      @MonaxNoire 2 месяца назад +1

      @@hi-Larry-ous yes they're much slower in water

  • @Markov092
    @Markov092 Год назад +9

    I remember Su-50 initially before fix/nerf had very fast turning speed. You could outmaneuver even best fighter jet players, that used F-35 or J-20.

  • @WZNGT
    @WZNGT 12 дней назад

    I also remember that the Russian heli Ka-60 is extremely easy to get tipped over due to having a narrow body and wheels, and sometimes you are in a tight spot that it cannot be brought back into flight.

  • @Hieb
    @Hieb Год назад +21

    Danny the kind of guy to leak discord dms smh
    Jokes aside, was fun to explain and show this so thanks :) would've probably made it more detailed but this gets the point across the nicely. 🤝

  • @AKK5I
    @AKK5I Год назад +429

    Yeah this is why most good servers were US vs US

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +14

      aye

    • @alessandrozanzarella9203
      @alessandrozanzarella9203 5 месяцев назад +150

      Nah it's bs, it ruins the immersion

    • @ABSOLUTAMENTENADIE-xy4bt
      @ABSOLUTAMENTENADIE-xy4bt 3 месяца назад

      ​@@alessandrozanzarella9203
      I mean... if Americans can't kill foreingers they kill each other.

    • @CJLegoFilmz
      @CJLegoFilmz 2 месяца назад +10

      ​@@alessandrozanzarella9203Reasonable rather take good balancing over ok immersion at best

    • @viktormilosevic8172
      @viktormilosevic8172 2 месяца назад +13

      *lamest

  • @amoose1709
    @amoose1709 Год назад +6

    The only thing I don't like about the viper is that the gunners head blocks ur view, especially annoying when shooting tows

    • @Hieb
      @Hieb Год назад +1

      Very true

    • @IlNamelessKinglI
      @IlNamelessKinglI Год назад +3

      Wait for him to shoot his tv 😂

    • @amoose1709
      @amoose1709 Год назад

      @@IlNamelessKinglI you can't always rely on that.

  • @PATOOFA
    @PATOOFA Год назад +1

    Wow...had no idea about the last one!

  • @dragonhoard9371
    @dragonhoard9371 3 месяца назад +2

    The havoc flys like a boat.

  • @tylerbryanhead
    @tylerbryanhead 2 месяца назад +1

    Flying a J20 is an absolute nightmare. F35s easily out turn and get behind, and the massive hit box makes it hard to miss

  • @dubmeisterxd2133
    @dubmeisterxd2133 Месяц назад

    I like the different vehicles, i almost wish it was more explored in future games. adds a bit of asymmetry

  • @AzureRath97
    @AzureRath97 Год назад +14

    These aren't massive differences Danny.

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +2

      they are tho

    • @AkiyamaKatsuko
      @AkiyamaKatsuko Год назад +3

      Between the Z-11 and the Little Bird. It's a night and day difference.

    • @CAL1MBO
      @CAL1MBO Месяц назад +1

      Only a difference if you're bad

    • @desubokudawanano
      @desubokudawanano Месяц назад

      Only between lite birds

  • @Adlumairsoft
    @Adlumairsoft Месяц назад +1

    You forgot to mention that the M1A2 has the best Gun depression facing forward tho, in a map with terrain and medium hills the M1 will always get the first shot off because its has -10° while the Chinese and Russain MBT sit at ~6°

  • @javierrojas4430
    @javierrojas4430 Год назад +4

    I think that those vehicles where balanced, or "fair", the science was that you had to learn how to use every vehicle, but finally all were balanced, even Tunguska 😅

  • @LuxSmash
    @LuxSmash Год назад +3

    took you almost 10 years to point this out, but we already know BF4 is an unbalanced mess with their vehicles, so this is no surprising

  • @killian9314
    @killian9314 Месяц назад

    T90 and MBT 99 don’t have the Abrams’s turret depression limitation when aiming behind itself.

  • @stickboslightning
    @stickboslightning Месяц назад

    Hieb is most certainly the man to talk to about such things

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Месяц назад

      I know my people 😎

  • @FreddyDff
    @FreddyDff Месяц назад

    Goede diepgang man! Wist wel dat er veel verschillen zijn maar niet op dit niveau😆 Sws nieuwe subscriber erbij

  • @digger5521
    @digger5521 Год назад +3

    Tks for video mate. what is that gameplay at 5:00 ? An AA on Shangy ???

  • @sicariomonarch
    @sicariomonarch 10 дней назад

    players discovering faction uniqueness

  • @shxmana
    @shxmana 5 месяцев назад

    yes I personally love to sumoworstel with tanks as well

  • @namesurname5256
    @namesurname5256 Год назад +1

    I didn't get the idea of difference between transport helis, pls simplifi

    • @Hieb
      @Hieb Год назад +5

      I agree the explanation and demonstration wasnt perfect so I'll explain. During normal flight, the rotorblades as a circle are a full hitbox for the venom and haitun transport helicopters, but not for the kasatka. This makes the hittable area of the kasatka about 1/3rd of the other two from all angles. If you are in one of the other two helicoters, you can reduce this hitbox by constantly seatswitching into and out of the pilot seat when someone is shooting at you to disable the additional hitbox for the time it takes the rotor blades to spin up visually.

  • @MalcolmNessGranger
    @MalcolmNessGranger Год назад +1

    Okay, quick question... how in 9 circles of hell do you get an LAV-AD on Shanghai of all places? Custom server or black magic? I have NEVER seen that. I remember Shanghai had an AC130 that was removed in the CTE version but not an AA.
    Also recommend to officialy nickname the Mi-28 the "Lead coffin" with its god awful weight and poor manueverability.

    • @AkiyamaKatsuko
      @AkiyamaKatsuko Год назад +1

      I think the AA was in the beta of BF4 but got removed due to "balance" reasons. Now helis reign supreme on that map.

  • @Not_Laci
    @Not_Laci 2 месяца назад +8

    Does the video come with a translator

  • @Tomofdahook17
    @Tomofdahook17 Месяц назад

    We don’t want the vehicles to be exactly the same on both factions. Asymmetric gameplay is what makes this game the most fun. And I only play hardcore.

  • @Hitchagood
    @Hitchagood Год назад +1

    While your politics are WAAAAY off in general... I appreciate you taking to the time to make a bf4 video in 2023. let's keep it alive

  • @thisaccountisuseless864
    @thisaccountisuseless864 Год назад +4

    bf4 vehicles being unbalanced???? Aint no way!!!!!

    • @IlNamelessKinglI
      @IlNamelessKinglI Год назад

      Most servers on PC have US vs US for that reason therefore there is no unbalance.

    • @thisaccountisuseless864
      @thisaccountisuseless864 Год назад

      @@IlNamelessKinglI I’m not saying on different sides, I’m saying all the vehicles or over powered in this game

  • @waynereloaded87
    @waynereloaded87 Месяц назад

    The diffrences arent big at first glance, but in a 1 vs 1, the better the players are, the more the hitboxes etc. make a diffrence

  • @desubokudawanano
    @desubokudawanano 22 дня назад

    Top 2 tanks in BF3 video when?

  • @lukelwnmr
    @lukelwnmr Год назад +1

    3:12 sumoworsteling ja? xD

  • @frolic63
    @frolic63 Месяц назад

    Nice point!

  • @gabbyaghoulfemboy
    @gabbyaghoulfemboy Год назад +5

    I prefer that actually gives a sense of realism

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +1

      Balance > Realism any day

    • @Happy_Sailor639
      @Happy_Sailor639 3 месяца назад +1

      You do know that BTR-90 was designed to just withstand bullet rounds, and transport infantry?

  • @MrSuperMichel1997
    @MrSuperMichel1997 7 месяцев назад

    Bijna steenkolen Engels, grappig xD

  • @Alva46XOXO
    @Alva46XOXO 4 месяца назад

    The Havoc sounds the best.

  • @stevemc6010
    @stevemc6010 Год назад +1

    Were these custom faction swap plugins just a BF4 thing? Wouldve been neat to, say, have the Americans on Amiens in BF1 for instance. Or British vs Japanese on the solomon islands in BFV

    • @IlNamelessKinglI
      @IlNamelessKinglI Год назад +2

      Only worked with in game factions. Cant pull factions out of thin air especially from games that came out LATER. A plug in isnt a straight up mod.

  • @sendingit2601
    @sendingit2601 2 месяца назад

    I play hardcore only at this point and the biggest difference that I notice is the visibility with Chinese aircraft

  • @Phlostonparadise2971
    @Phlostonparadise2971 5 месяцев назад

    As someone who really loves when my depth of weapon knowledge gives me an edge in a game, I wish all those who instead want devs to play fuckey games with balancing a very sharp Lego underfoot.

  • @blueskuII58
    @blueskuII58 4 месяца назад

    I’m glad I play on xbox because I didn’t know there was crazy movement tech and same country battles 😂

  • @baseddepartment285
    @baseddepartment285 Год назад +1

    Battlefield 3 next

  • @WastelandWanderer1216
    @WastelandWanderer1216 Месяц назад

    Any tank you hit in the rear is going to be a crit because you're hitting the engine and transmission which is actually quite realistic. I killed many tanks as both a Engineer with a rocket launcher and a tank by going for rear shots.

  • @lexusgalavan1410
    @lexusgalavan1410 Год назад +2

    Bf players take attention to detail for granted and they should be lucky that the bf games continue to do so. Instead they whine about attention to detail for the wrong reasons and ignore it where it's been added or remains. Then devs put attention on nuanced parts of the game and get rid of innovative additions to the game or scratch innovations they could offer. For players that play the same loadout each game and that only care about meta or for one to exist. Even between vehicles. When all aspects and ever-changing details make BF what it is.

  • @Deepwang84
    @Deepwang84 9 дней назад

    I couldn't care less if the vehicles are unbalanced not everything needs to be clones of each other with different skins

  • @j-hod6274
    @j-hod6274 Месяц назад

    I always did do better in the T-90. The abrams seemed so sluggish and it massive in comparison.

  • @reppingl
    @reppingl Год назад

    BTR90 is so damn good

  • @Dajones9191
    @Dajones9191 9 дней назад

    Every single vehicle needs a nerf. There is absolutely no reason a tank should be able to go faster than a tesla at a drop of a dime, take 3 C4 to destroy it, repairs fully in 5 seconds AND has 3rd person view. Not to mention infrared, zoom optics, smoke screens, shields, etc..... like wtf? I'm all for tanks being able to take a hit, but when combined with super speed and aim sensitivity, it's just not fun.
    I shouldn't have to be one of the best, sneakiest, quickest, and most thought out player in the game to even have a CHANCE at destroying one.
    It's insanely stupid. And they all have unlimited ammo.
    Really hope in BF6 they tone it down a bit. Once any random gets in a vehicle, they think they are the6 best battlefields ever seen, but in reality, they've just taken more damage than any tank in the history of mankind and are still rolling away at 60km/h....

  • @nellis1855
    @nellis1855 Год назад

    This was really cool

  • @Rseert
    @Rseert Год назад +2

    BEST battlefield ever

  • @walliwabbel
    @walliwabbel Месяц назад

    tell us you're dutch without telling us you're dutch

  • @razgriss5882
    @razgriss5882 Месяц назад

    First time on his channel, but i can bet he's dutch

  • @Fadedfrost1
    @Fadedfrost1 Месяц назад

    Someone finally spoke out
    The chinese and Russian choppers were garbage but little bird is very agile and useful
    Yes I still play bf4 after 10 years

  • @alvasg550
    @alvasg550 Месяц назад

    hitboxes should be the same, force players to hit center mass on vehicles.

  • @dominicviner6619
    @dominicviner6619 2 месяца назад

    T90 gets up to speed faster in pretty sure but noticeably lighter and would slide

  • @AXIvan000
    @AXIvan000 Месяц назад

    oddly I did take notice the difference in vehicles but yeah in the end it's a team effort to get the win, not much complaints from my end of the world

  • @joshcummings7421
    @joshcummings7421 Месяц назад

    Critical hit glitch? Do you mean weak spot? Having a weak spot on the roof of a vehicle makes sense. Lmao

  • @SONNENKVLT
    @SONNENKVLT 2 месяца назад

    When basement dwellers sweatlords ruin the whole server fauna

  • @nicolarighetto3767
    @nicolarighetto3767 Месяц назад

    I think i've never seen same faction servers on console, do they even exist?

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Месяц назад

      Done with procon, so prob not

  • @luckyflyerclub8970
    @luckyflyerclub8970 Месяц назад

    I prefer games this way. Fuck balance. Balance is nothing but a participation trophy excuse.

  • @degenerat3380
    @degenerat3380 Год назад +2

    funny that if the game was more realistic the MI-28 should be the best helicopter and the T-90A and ZTZ99 should be much worse than the abrams (both have terrible reverse speed in real life and much worse turret traverse)

    • @MalcolmNessGranger
      @MalcolmNessGranger Год назад +1

      Agreed but if we going that route the abrams should be a 4 seater in order to compensate for long reload times unlike the T-90 and Type-99 that have autoloaders. Also both the Abrams and T-90 should have Reactive Armor plating like IRL and different. All 3 tanks should have smoke canisters ready and available for discharge without swapping for Active protection.
      shells that can be switched between.

    • @degenerat3380
      @degenerat3380 Год назад

      @@MalcolmNessGranger the autolouder in the T-72/ZTZ99 is slower than a typical Abrams loader, Reactive armor does not have to be so detailed modeled, it is enough that the tank can withstand about 5 hits, the game also has the option of additional reactive armor, which gives one more hit to be destroyed

  • @sheldonkupa9120
    @sheldonkupa9120 Год назад +2

    It is funny, bf4 just refuses to die like count Dracula😂👍👏 i have 5k hours and still not boring. Do you think 2042 will still be played in 9 years?!

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад

      will the servers even be up?

  • @nickbuckley4371
    @nickbuckley4371 8 месяцев назад

    Is this only on pc

  • @1998diegox
    @1998diegox Месяц назад

    yea I got thousands of hours flying littlebird and z11 and the littebird is massively better to handle

  • @sekutard5157
    @sekutard5157 Месяц назад

    I thought there was also a slower lock on for the russian.. no?

  • @kodac4256
    @kodac4256 5 месяцев назад

    They were small differences.

  • @33up24
    @33up24 Месяц назад

    So the perfect server should be CH v RU

  • @Cooltaha
    @Cooltaha Год назад

    Interesting video Danke danke

  • @Violencia1111
    @Violencia1111 8 дней назад

    I would so much rather have different stats for different faction vehicles than not.
    Having factions just be clones of one-another in every way except visuals is just, boring in a game like Battlefield. There's no subtly or nuance to the factions without some variance in gameplay styles. We already have soldiers with clone equipment, why make the vehicles just as boring?

  • @Warfaremachine0095
    @Warfaremachine0095 5 месяцев назад

    Im gonna to bonk this video the all the mf who complain about BF2042 specialist begin identical to each other factions

  • @anfrex3342
    @anfrex3342 2 месяца назад

    All this time I thought the Russians had the best vehicles in BF3/4, I always dominated with them.

  • @nickzaccheo9294
    @nickzaccheo9294 2 месяца назад

    This isn't fucking Warthunder.

  • @georgesgranger6362
    @georgesgranger6362 Месяц назад

    Must be why most milsims sucked then, because my buddy and I had a group of 'Mercs' who always played OPFOR and mopped the floor with US Milsims.. 😂

  • @cloverbeast916
    @cloverbeast916 27 дней назад

    Bad company had good uniqueness but bf2 mc did it best.

  • @sonwig5186
    @sonwig5186 Месяц назад

    Why is the Russian helicopter the worst heli??? The country is known for its good helicpters. And the Abrams.

  • @rawula
    @rawula Год назад +1

    Hey danny

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Год назад +1

      hi

    • @rawula
      @rawula Год назад +1

      @@DANNYonPC make more Longform vids pls

  • @TheSecondBeef
    @TheSecondBeef Год назад

    Btw your meme was hilarious

  • @iVETAnsolini
    @iVETAnsolini Месяц назад

    Bro, are you even on a pc?

  • @OPTSXFilosoofis
    @OPTSXFilosoofis Месяц назад

    Dutch accent spotted

  • @Antimanele104
    @Antimanele104 Месяц назад +1

    Sorry, chief, this video just ain't it.
    I don't like how the J20 has a bigger silhouette than other stealth jets, but mirror-match servers are destroying every bit of immersion, being the absolute worst.
    Not to mention it causes a nightmare for the infantry players who can get confused from enemy lines and walk into a trap.

    • @DANNYonPC
      @DANNYonPC  Месяц назад

      ''players who can get confused from enemy lines and walk into a trap.''
      thats why names are a thing
      with name = friend
      no name (or red) = enemy

    • @Antimanele104
      @Antimanele104 Месяц назад +1

      ​@@DANNYonPC
      Not on hardcore servers, though.
      And even if it's a normal server, most players will follow audio clues, it's somewhat more intuitive than to look at the minimap and see if friendlies or enemies are near.