first thing Microsoft did when ChatGPT4 got traction, was putting it on Bing and thereby connecting it to the internet. Now ChatGPT 4 wasn't yet an AGI, G standing for General here. It still is troubling that the profit motiv or the competivness is so strongly ingrained in us, that when the next system comes along and we may not even see it yet, that it would be in the end an AGI, because how would we if it decides to stay covert, that then the first thing we do again is give it access to everything.
@@_nom_ maybe rouge, totally decentralized p2p AGI that constantly self-improves its own architecture and trained on all data available on all nodes, with all emergent parameters stored in blockchain
Yes they do. That’s why it’s the headline, to scaremonger. But yeah it’s still terrifying putting a nuclear reactor in the same building as a super brain we can’t understand. Could go kamikaze mode
Actually, not much. There are small nuclear reactors on ships all over the world. There's even one at a Naval college in London. There have been no recorded accidents since the 1970s. And even when they do go wrong, the danger is fairly minimal because they're self-contained. We should probably be using more of them.
In other words, AI can mine all the crytos they want and fund themselves and even blackmail or bribe with unlimited funds and the private data they collect.
Regarding chatbots as girlfriends or boyfriends indeed echoes the sci-fi film ‘Her’ (2013), but it also brings to mind medical chatbots. I read somewhere about research suggesting that the new generation feels more comfortable speaking to a chatbot than to their own GP because chatbots do not judge them. This is particularly true in some cultures. I also recall a GP in my family mentioning that they can tell when a patient is lying, even in simple questions like, ‘How many cigarettes do you smoke a day?
We should probably be using these small nuclear reactors more often. They're already powering ships all over the world. And unlike larger reactors, the consequences of a malfunction are fairly minor.
In regards to nuclear reactors, it's not that big of deal tbh. Nuscale and Rolls Royce are two companies I found right off the bat that offer SMRs (small nuclear reactors).
Only two SMRs in the world are operational. One is in Russian and the other in China. RR are waiting for the UK government to licence them. That could take forever.
The issues with AI begin with those who manage, control, write, create, program it in the 1st place. Those who are at the Top of those Ai System hierarchy. Those who are already uncontrollable. Corruption breeds corruption and AI has given them the ability to be Absolutely Corrupt at a whole new level, Technological.
not exactly related to ths specifically, but if were going to go down the ai road and bolster its abilities and continue developing ai to where it can do all of our mundane things in life and replace jobs, i think we need an entire overhaul of what society expects out of people, the way society will support people losing jobs to ai, and figure out ways to protect the new generation that wont have access to work.
@@freeamericanthinker558As sad as this is, this is probably a good idea. I would also probably start to get comfortable with rough living, since, at least in the US, I highly doubt any real safety guarantee will ever pass and you will be told to deal with it.
If I'm not wrong, is as if some people imagine the ai future like in the movies in which machines do all kinds of human labor. They might not see the scale of things. The human brain uses 20 watts. Assuming neuromorphic ai gets to be 1000 times less efficient, a megawatt scale supercomputer would still be like a god. By the time our life is changed by automation, governments and corporations could have built superintelligent machines, simce they can massively scale ais consumers use. After that it becomes unpredictable.
gardening is something i have been diving much deeper into. i have a great green thumb already but there is a lot more to just growing aspect of it too. i didnt realize how much science, biology, land management, irrigation, and all sorts or everything. i will say im damn good at growing cannabis and chili peppers and have been gaining lots of experience growing mushrooms as well. @@freeamericanthinker558
rough living, i ahve been saying for a long time about being in the age of convenience and that its actually counter productive to human nature. i am in and out with the rainbow family scene so i quite enjoy that rough living, digging latrines to poop in, chopping and hauling firewood for kitchens that are cooking rather bland and kind o not very good tasting food but its sustainable and you share it with thousands of people and there is just something special in that moment of being vulnerable and relying on others while they too are relying upon you. its modern society at its most primal in my opinion and i would imagine that is how tribes lived before modern society and big cities supporting millions of people. gardening, hunting, crafting essentials, there is so much to survival but you really only need one skill and you can barter. i think the world would be such a better place in that system because look at historical accomplishments like the sistine chapel, michelangelo's statues, beethovens symphonies, etc just some examples of what people were able to do in times where it wasnt like were struggling to survive in the same way today as people did back then so the creative mind was more free to work on things like that. i dunno maybe im way off base. @@EbonySaints
This woman downplaying the concerns of industry professionals seems to not understand the nature of AI being a "black box". Sure, the outputs whilst using chatgpt might look all friendly, but that's after heavy tuning and filtering, no one knows what's going on in the background and LLMs are naturally not very well behaved (as they are typically just trained off of any text online) and by default, output lots of potentially harmful content. There is no definitive way to say if an LLM may be harmful.
I don't think she realises that we already have commercial nuclear power stations which are already incredibly regulated, SMRs are the perfect solution for data centres due to their low cost.
Creating a successor species is no small feat. If we succeed, i hope they keep us around and not treat us as we treat at times old people ... sending them to retirment homes without their concent.
Cheers, fellow human. There is a good recent paper published online called "Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans" that explores many reasons we might not expect to live long through this. I'd link if youtube allowed it. Anyways, it's worth a read; it also tries to offer some hope.
@@masonlee9109 Some expert think that we have AGI, G standing for general here not generativ, within 7 months. The intelligence explosion is at the end of the section of curve where it becomes expentonetial. People from the big AI companies say already that they hardly can keep up with papers and studies from their own company, not to speak of those of their competition or research papers from other sources. Besides some hoping for good things out of this like medicine and magical materials to solve our problems, the other portion of people driving this development are greedy investors striving for market control through competition, nations striving for geopolitcal control and overall stupid humans who have no clue what waits for us all at the end of the line. We have to think positiv and try to influence this in a way that the worst does not happen, avoiding a bunch of dystopian futures that suddenly came into our grasp. As if we give up and do not try, it pretty much becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.
These people are just killing the competition with regulation, saying “AI can go wrong” then building the most advanced one’s.. We know your tactics Sam
The issue is not whether we can control AI. It's the fact that we can't control the people that use AI. Once the technology is available, the worst that can happen, will happen, thanks to the reliable immorality of humanity.
Very safe of course given all that’s already happened with nuclear & AI sure we have nothing at all to worry about it can’t possibly go wrong ,how wonderful of these bright people to help us out with all these amazing ideas
Saying we can't train AI without copyrighted works is so last year. It has been proven that synthetic data can not only work as well but even better in some cases.
Human artists have also trained their brains (neural networks) on other artists copyrighted material. She also doesn't seem to understand that a lot of the scaremongering in AI is just meant to get attention and hype to certain companies.
The looking at the notes....i can tell you are doing it when I am not even looking at the video. But I find you well-spoken and great,, otherwise, analyst lady.
Use analogue photonic chips. They have been shown to only consume 1/4 000 000 of the power. Also get someone on the BBC who knows what they are talking about.
So, the one safety feature we have to fall back on is that we can always just turn the power off at the data centres ... but just turning off nuclear power isn't an option without a meltdown. Sounds more like AI is already running the show and is engaging in self protection.
@@effexonYou missed the point completely ... how do you read a whole sentence and then chose to focus on the most irrelevant part of it to add your 5 cents?
"One might ask ... there is a disconnect." OR, one might listen and find out. Altman said that he believes this technology will be the biggest positive change in the history of humankind and the likelihood that it will end up badly is very law. But it is not zero so we need to make sure we do it right.
The current war between Russia and Ukraine is like two brothers fighting over wealth, after their parents died (the Soviet Union). - The leaders of both sides pushed hundreds of thousands of people on both sides to death, it was cruel - Why don't the two brothers (Russia and Ukraine) negotiate?
This woman actually knows what she is talking about, quite interesting actually ! ( I guess she is a scientist) TBH this nucleair scientist she is talking about...could be AI. I've seen so many interviews with Sam Altman, I they really did not know what they should be asking him. To be honest : the invention of how to make fire, how to build steam engines, industrial revolution, how to use electricity and the internet and now neural networks. To I think in order of significance : neural networks > fire. The others don't even come close.
I'm a layperson, but it's the ai in possibly 10, 20, 30 years' time that possibly worries me, not possibly the ai of today, plus even if we possibly stopped devement now, what possibly stops someone in their basement or even another country from just possibly carrying on development regardless, I feel.
Last topic of conversation about rebirth boy friend is very shameful for all human beings because in the presence of male in the world women talk about her feelings to Ai. This sound so sorrowful for me.😢😢😢
For god's sake, it's not Artificial intelligence... It's machine learning and advanced algorithm... Stop calling it an AI, we, as humans, aren't even close to creating an AI. All this is just a marketing trick.
In a few years we'll all be laughing at how crazy we were for thinking AI would be our doom... if not... well no one will be around anymore to prove me wrong... 😅
Connor: "Skynet cannot be switched off, it had spread to every computer in the world."
Skynet: "Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen."
Skynet is like a Virus....... "it has spread to every computer in the world"
first thing Microsoft did when ChatGPT4 got traction, was putting it on Bing and thereby connecting it to the internet. Now ChatGPT 4 wasn't yet an AGI, G standing for General here. It still is troubling that the profit motiv or the competivness is so strongly ingrained in us, that when the next system comes along and we may not even see it yet, that it would be in the end an AGI, because how would we if it decides to stay covert, that then the first thing we do again is give it access to everything.
Not really how things work, but okay
@@_nom_ maybe rouge, totally decentralized p2p AGI that constantly self-improves its own architecture and trained on all data available on all nodes, with all emergent parameters stored in blockchain
“AI goes Nuclear”
There’s like 6 movies on why this is a bad idea
*There are
"there are like"? @@cheese-power
AI + nuclear power, do you want to play a game?
I pick red.
"Strange game. The only way to win is not to play." (Turns out this famous movie quote applies to AGI as well as nuclear war!)
BBC... you have no idea how horrifying "AI Goes Nuclear" sounds
Yes they do. That’s why it’s the headline, to scaremonger.
But yeah it’s still terrifying putting a nuclear reactor in the same building as a super brain we can’t understand. Could go kamikaze mode
click bait
I somehow thought they meant Al Gore goes nuclear.😂
Me and my eyes .
@@cptgrimm"When you say it is terrifying to put a nuclear reactor in a building with a brain, we can't understand" is the worry based on suicidal AI?
LOL, skynet coming sooner than i thought. Inevitable then.
You have to destroy a reactor process in order to to destroy the AI server. Where is John Conner?
Skynet: "Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen."
2029 that's when Arnold showed up in movie. Oh💩
2029 could well be when ARNOLD Shawtzerniger become usa president and say to us: dont be afraid of robot we have the control!!
Sounds like the premise of a sci fi story about how it goes wrong.
Reality follows sci-fi more than sci-fi follow reality. Weirdly enough, many visionaries are creatives and don't care about making tons of money.
Colossus: The Forbin Project (movie)
Must see!
true
we still have a chance to be the main character
No pulling the plug on me hahaaaaa
“Some men just want to watch the world burn” - Alfred
and now they have the tools to make that a reality in the next decade
are you talking of AI burning people minds and society or radioactive burn :D
Power built in so it can't be turned off. Brilliant. Jesus Christ 🙄
WHAT COULD GO WRONG
No mistakes
TRULY.
Actually, not much. There are small nuclear reactors on ships all over the world. There's even one at a Naval college in London. There have been no recorded accidents since the 1970s. And even when they do go wrong, the danger is fairly minimal because they're self-contained. We should probably be using more of them.
Brainiac!
Because Fukushima never happened, right?@@andybrice2711
We are not worried about AI, we are worried about what people will do with AI.
Skynet likes this
Skynet: "Everything is proceeding as I have foreseen."
In other words, AI can mine all the crytos they want and fund themselves and even blackmail or bribe with unlimited funds and the private data they collect.
Definitely one of the concerns.
Most crypto no longer work on the mining principle and rather a “proof of stake” model
But yeah I see what you’re saying
Why would they have to do all that when they can just print money?
Conspiracy nut 😂
the extra reason to start regulating and monitoring all crypto, banning crypto that takes lots of energy (inefficiency),, etc.
thats actually smart.. if that plan works , no need for military as can disrupt financial system and thus blackmail nations you dont like.
Regarding chatbots as girlfriends or boyfriends indeed echoes the sci-fi film ‘Her’ (2013), but it also brings to mind medical chatbots. I read somewhere about research suggesting that the new generation feels more comfortable speaking to a chatbot than to their own GP because chatbots do not judge them. This is particularly true in some cultures. I also recall a GP in my family mentioning that they can tell when a patient is lying, even in simple questions like, ‘How many cigarettes do you smoke a day?
You remember the film TERMINATOR 🤔
We should probably be using these small nuclear reactors more often. They're already powering ships all over the world. And unlike larger reactors, the consequences of a malfunction are fairly minor.
"Yeah, yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should."
In regards to nuclear reactors, it's not that big of deal tbh. Nuscale and Rolls Royce are two companies I found right off the bat that offer SMRs (small nuclear reactors).
Only two SMRs in the world are operational. One is in Russian and the other in China. RR are waiting for the UK government to licence them. That could take forever.
What could possibly go wrong
Luddites could get upset and start screaming and jumping up and down again.
The issues with AI begin with those who manage, control, write, create, program it in the 1st place. Those who are at the Top of those Ai System hierarchy. Those who are already uncontrollable.
Corruption breeds corruption and AI has given them the ability to be Absolutely Corrupt at a whole new level, Technological.
Great interview and really informative 🙏🏽
A nuclear reactor next to a bunker next to a data center training AI
not exactly related to ths specifically, but if were going to go down the ai road and bolster its abilities and continue developing ai to where it can do all of our mundane things in life and replace jobs, i think we need an entire overhaul of what society expects out of people, the way society will support people losing jobs to ai, and figure out ways to protect the new generation that wont have access to work.
I would get books on gardening.
@@freeamericanthinker558As sad as this is, this is probably a good idea. I would also probably start to get comfortable with rough living, since, at least in the US, I highly doubt any real safety guarantee will ever pass and you will be told to deal with it.
If I'm not wrong, is as if some people imagine the ai future like in the movies in which machines do all kinds of human labor. They might not see the scale of things. The human brain uses 20 watts. Assuming neuromorphic ai gets to be 1000 times less efficient, a megawatt scale supercomputer would still be like a god. By the time our life is changed by automation, governments and corporations could have built superintelligent machines, simce they can massively scale ais consumers use. After that it becomes unpredictable.
gardening is something i have been diving much deeper into. i have a great green thumb already but there is a lot more to just growing aspect of it too. i didnt realize how much science, biology, land management, irrigation, and all sorts or everything.
i will say im damn good at growing cannabis and chili peppers and have been gaining lots of experience growing mushrooms as well. @@freeamericanthinker558
rough living, i ahve been saying for a long time about being in the age of convenience and that its actually counter productive to human nature. i am in and out with the rainbow family scene so i quite enjoy that rough living, digging latrines to poop in, chopping and hauling firewood for kitchens that are cooking rather bland and kind o not very good tasting food but its sustainable and you share it with thousands of people and there is just something special in that moment of being vulnerable and relying on others while they too are relying upon you. its modern society at its most primal in my opinion and i would imagine that is how tribes lived before modern society and big cities supporting millions of people.
gardening, hunting, crafting essentials, there is so much to survival but you really only need one skill and you can barter.
i think the world would be such a better place in that system because look at historical accomplishments like the sistine chapel, michelangelo's statues, beethovens symphonies, etc just some examples of what people were able to do in times where it wasnt like were struggling to survive in the same way today as people did back then so the creative mind was more free to work on things like that. i dunno maybe im way off base. @@EbonySaints
Too much innovation leads to too much amount of disaster.
Let the robot wars commence!
AI and Nuclear two words that should never be used in the same sentence
lets use the cyborg security as well to guard the site
No
Sounds 100% safe!
This woman downplaying the concerns of industry professionals seems to not understand the nature of AI being a "black box".
Sure, the outputs whilst using chatgpt might look all friendly, but that's after heavy tuning and filtering, no one knows what's going on in the background and LLMs are naturally not very well behaved (as they are typically just trained off of any text online) and by default, output lots of potentially harmful content.
There is no definitive way to say if an LLM may be harmful.
Filed under, "What could possibly go wrong."
I don't think she realises that we already have commercial nuclear power stations which are already incredibly regulated, SMRs are the perfect solution for data centres due to their low cost.
Buy seeds. Buy fertilizers. Buy Iodine. Keep a gun at home.
Fun,informative presentation 😊thank you 😊
Creating a successor species is no small feat. If we succeed, i hope they keep us around and not treat us as we treat at times old people ... sending them to retirment homes without their concent.
Cheers, fellow human. There is a good recent paper published online called "Natural Selection Favors AIs over Humans" that explores many reasons we might not expect to live long through this. I'd link if youtube allowed it. Anyways, it's worth a read; it also tries to offer some hope.
@@masonlee9109 Some expert think that we have AGI, G standing for general here not generativ, within 7 months. The intelligence explosion is at the end of the section of curve where it becomes expentonetial. People from the big AI companies say already that they hardly can keep up with papers and studies from their own company, not to speak of those of their competition or research papers from other sources. Besides some hoping for good things out of this like medicine and magical materials to solve our problems, the other portion of people driving this development are greedy investors striving for market control through competition, nations striving for geopolitcal control and overall stupid humans who have no clue what waits for us all at the end of the line.
We have to think positiv and try to influence this in a way that the worst does not happen, avoiding a bunch of dystopian futures that suddenly came into our grasp. As if we give up and do not try, it pretty much becomes a self fullfilling prophecy.
@@masonlee9109 ruclips.net/video/sMRDCf7fVZ0/видео.html
"AI goes nuclear" You could've used "Datacentres may use nuclear reactors in the future"
Fight this.
No.
Terminator got it right lol, who would have thought it.
Give the most dangerous thing in creation its own power source. Brilliant.
‘It’ll be fine.’ Chat Bot 2176
So we build a weapon for a.i :) how smart we are. İ am sure the a.i is smiling violantly
Well that doesn't sound like a disaster just waiting to happen! 😂
Right?!
What can possibly go wrong?
Good segment
All this couldn’t possibly blow up with a bug or glitch or something inconceivable
These people are just killing the competition with regulation, saying “AI can go wrong” then building the most advanced one’s.. We know your tactics Sam
The issue is not whether we can control AI.
It's the fact that we can't control the people that use AI.
Once the technology is available, the worst that can happen, will happen, thanks to the reliable immorality of humanity.
Well said
Possibly one of the worst ideas that hasn't yet been stopped...
Next thing you know they'll give it centrifuges
Can't believe everything that's going on
You couldn't make this 💩 up.. 🤷🤦
Skynet did, and now you're living in it.
Very safe of course given all that’s already happened with nuclear & AI sure we have nothing at all to worry about it can’t possibly go wrong ,how wonderful of these bright people to help us out with all these amazing ideas
"AI will cure cancer!" "AI will solve climate change!" What they don't tell you is what AI will do next after that.
“No evidence ‘crime’ can be controlled” when people using AI in the way they aren’t respect each other and become out of control themselves.
That is it, Game over folks
Saying we can't train AI without copyrighted works is so last year. It has been proven that synthetic data can not only work as well but even better in some cases.
OT:Benny Hill considered funnier than Monty Python by two TV stations --WOR and WLVI!
Bad idea, that will be the marvel and downfall of everything. Where is john conner
This is the right development. Today the datacentres are overloading the grid. They are the perfect clients for nuclear reactors.
Sounds cool.
i have got an A.I named lions and unicors. nothing beats it. The question is, those were my friends and loved ones, and I will free them.
Human artists have also trained their brains (neural networks) on other artists copyrighted material. She also doesn't seem to understand that a lot of the scaremongering in AI is just meant to get attention and hype to certain companies.
I just realized Oh no, look at my picture. Future battery
Tiny nuclear reactors is the way to go for energy
I wonder what would possibly go right?
3:58 This is a very silly question. If he doesn't then someone else will, better to have someone worried than someone who isn't.
also biggest fan of brss eye.
Such a good idea to not be able to pull the plug on Skynet lol😂
This is a really bad idea.
yeah we may should rethink the idea of giving future skynet its own power supply -.-
It's like both words on their own aren't terrifying enough...
Nice
Power
"Colossus: The Forbin Project"
The looking at the notes....i can tell you are doing it when I am not even looking at the video.
But I find you well-spoken and great,, otherwise, analyst lady.
It has been done before, the SKALA computers in the Soviet NPP's.
Use analogue photonic chips. They have been shown to only consume 1/4 000 000 of the power.
Also get someone on the BBC who knows what they are talking about.
Good
So, the one safety feature we have to fall back on is that we can always just turn the power off at the data centres ... but just turning off nuclear power isn't an option without a meltdown.
Sounds more like AI is already running the show and is engaging in self protection.
I think it is possible with automating that small reactor.... fuel pellet would only be size of sugar cube.
@@effexonYou missed the point completely ... how do you read a whole sentence and then chose to focus on the most irrelevant part of it to add your 5 cents?
Nuclear weapons.
Build electric hydro dam in Nepal.
Very smart and strong woman, salute ma’am!
This people are great! And I just love their accent!
Great guest! Like how she sees through the B.S.
FUNCTIONS//Equilibrium symbols MIGRATION OF SYMBOLS Let__rs become words Le_t_rs specific meaning
(MEMBRANE )
"One might ask ... there is a disconnect."
OR, one might listen and find out.
Altman said that he believes this technology will be the biggest positive change in the history of humankind and the likelihood that it will end up badly is very law. But it is not zero so we need to make sure we do it right.
Rosatom has very effective and cost effective Small Reactors, they are actually the best on the planet.
kremlin bot or rosatom employee?
@@RojiUraBokuToKimiE Just truth teller!
The current war between Russia and Ukraine is like two brothers fighting over wealth, after their parents died (the Soviet Union).
- The leaders of both sides pushed hundreds of thousands of people on both sides to death, it was cruel
- Why don't the two brothers (Russia and Ukraine) negotiate?
Mars conjunct Pluto in Aquarius
8:59 for the news in the title.
This woman actually knows what she is talking about, quite interesting actually ! ( I guess she is a scientist)
TBH this nucleair scientist she is talking about...could be AI.
I've seen so many interviews with Sam Altman, I they really did not know what they should be asking him.
To be honest : the invention of how to make fire, how to build steam engines, industrial revolution, how to use electricity and the internet and now neural networks.
To I think in order of significance : neural networks > fire. The others don't even come close.
Ridiculous. Machines will become smallet, data centers too will become smaller. The power they use massively reduced.
I'm a layperson, but it's the ai in possibly 10, 20, 30 years' time that possibly worries me, not possibly the ai of today, plus even if we possibly stopped devement now, what possibly stops someone in their basement or even another country from just possibly carrying on development regardless, I feel.
Last topic of conversation about rebirth boy friend is very shameful for all human beings because in the presence of male in the world women talk about her feelings to Ai. This sound so sorrowful for me.😢😢😢
These AI companies are going to make billions+ for decades off of these applications of AI.
Pay for what you used to build it. Period.
For god's sake, it's not Artificial intelligence... It's machine learning and advanced algorithm... Stop calling it an AI, we, as humans, aren't even close to creating an AI.
All this is just a marketing trick.
🖤
right now the thing is that the AI not able to praduse power but now we give I'm special power supply good luck with that
9:01 if you actually came to this video because of the title and you want to skip the rest of useless talks
In a few years we'll all be laughing at how crazy we were for thinking AI would be our doom... if not... well no one will be around anymore to prove me wrong... 😅
Is it really a good idear to make a potential threat, energy independent? Besides giving this power to private companies seems outright dumb.
We need to realise WE ARE NOT GODS.