#EP17

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @upscunstoppables
    @upscunstoppables  2 месяца назад +1

    [🎉 Teacher's Day Special Offer Ends Today 🎉] 👉 UPSC CSE Subscription now at just ₹24,999! Subscribe Now: unacademy.com/goal/upsc-civil-services-examination-ias-preparation/KSCGY/subscribe?plan_type=plus&referral_code=SIDLIVE (🔖discount Code: SIDLIVE).
    Unlock Premium Access:
    ✅ 70+ Selections from Plus Courses in CSE 2023 ✅ Complete GS + CSAT + Test Series ✅ Unlimited Access to All Batches
    Hurry!!!
    Celebrate learning and make your dreams a reality! 🚀

  • @RANVEER0777
    @RANVEER0777 16 дней назад

    sir samjh mai aagye bauth aacha se

  • @upscaspirant190
    @upscaspirant190 2 месяца назад +14

    Sir bich bich m bahut class miss kr rhe hai aap ....mai soch rha tha ki aapke sath sath chalne se laxmikant ki book around 100days m cover ho jayegi pr mujhe ab lg rha hai ye time aur extend ho sakta hai ....

  • @randhir-i8m
    @randhir-i8m 2 месяца назад +3

    The basic structure of doctrine is some of the basic features of the constitution which cannot be amended on by the parliament( article 368)

  • @meet1200
    @meet1200 13 дней назад

    Due to Land Acquisition need by GOI, 1st Amendment was done, Sajjan Singh and Shankari Prasad case Article 368 supersedes Article 13 of Constitution, then comes Golaknath Case where Article 13 supersedes Article 368, In 1971 by 24th CAA Article 13 is amended and it is said that any changes by A-368 cannot be challenged by A-13 thus curb Judiciary, Finally in Keshvanand Bharti Case Basic Structure Doctrine is produced which cannot be changed as it is essence of Constitution and other articles can be varied, made and repealed under A-368 by Parliament.

  • @kirankumari5317
    @kirankumari5317 2 месяца назад +3

    Thank you so much sir very helpful video.

  • @singhsahab1856
    @singhsahab1856 2 месяца назад +1

    Sir, the basic structure of the constitution unequivocally in breviloquent manner avers, that state cannot set out such law which abysmally contravene fundamental rights.. Contemporaneously it had been avowedly enunciated in keshavanand bharti vs state of kerela 1973..notwithstanding the fact that state can amend constitution regardless of abnegating basic or essential fabric of the constitution..

  • @Mr.M94100
    @Mr.M94100 2 месяца назад +1

    Thanks a lot sir

  • @shwetansh312
    @shwetansh312 2 месяца назад +1

    Thankyou sir

  • @Miss.someone_
    @Miss.someone_ 2 месяца назад +3

    Sir plzzz roj classs l lia karo aapki aadat lag gai h ab

  • @SnehaVashisth-d4s
    @SnehaVashisth-d4s 2 месяца назад +1

    Article -13 -state esa koi law nhi bna skta jo fundamental right ko void kre ,Article -368 (parliament amend kr skti hai[kesvananda bharti case 1973] pr Basic structure mai change nhi )

  • @destinymakers872
    @destinymakers872 24 дня назад

    awsm Sir

  • @ajaypatel-kpt
    @ajaypatel-kpt 14 дней назад

    5THANK U SIR

  • @snehagoyal7923
    @snehagoyal7923 2 месяца назад +1

    Sir pls aap weekly polity governance ir k current affairs laiye weekly

  • @adyasharma6948
    @adyasharma6948 2 месяца назад +1

    sir in champakan dhorairajan case this thing was challenged that how can 31abc voilate fr plz explain??

  • @ziyaziya6221
    @ziyaziya6221 2 месяца назад +1

    Zoology optional ki class kha hoti hai mujhe ku nhi mil rhi ha