Awesome 👍 You have explained it in very less time. I had watched very long videos to understand it but the lengthy video was also not capable to explain it clearly. Thank you 😊
Runout does everything position does and also controls form. Runout tolerance is more strict. This video explains it: ruclips.net/video/aw5EK5U0Vb8/видео.html Another video with different applications for runout and position: ruclips.net/video/Y4woF-aE2Xo/видео.html
perpendicularity and total runout are not the same at 90 degrees to your datum axis. Perpendicularity refers to an angle measured in degrees rotationally (360 degrees) where total runout is measured linearly as mm or in as a surface function (in a straight line 180 degrees)....sorry dude RIP
Perpendicularity tolerance on a surface is never in degrees units. Its always distance units (between two parallel planes). This can be verified with a dial indicator. Per ASME Y14.5-2018: 9.3.2 Orientation Tolerance An orientation tolerance specifies: (a) a tolerance zone defined by two parallel planes at the specified basic angle from, parallel to, or perpendicular to one or more datum planes or datum axes, within which the surface, axis, or center plane of the considered feature shall be contained. See Figures 9-1 through 9-7.
This was so so helpful! I was not getting the full picture reading about runout and this made it make sense! The Lord bless your work!
You did a good job explain it. Total run out (3D) = Position + Cylindricity and Circular run out (2D) = Position + Circularity. Thank you Scott 👍
Awesome, glad it helped.
Life saver videos. Im grateful to RUclips for bringing me this video. Thank you
And thank you Scott.
Awesome 👍
You have explained it in very less time. I had watched very long videos to understand it but the lengthy video was also not capable to explain it clearly.
Thank you 😊
I found this channel today. This is so helpful
Your lectures on gd&t is very helpful to me. Thank you from S.korea
Thanks!
Really well explained.
Can Total runout be used instead of coaxiality? For the same geometric tolerance value, which one is more stringent than Total runout or coaxiality?
Runout does everything position does and also controls form. Runout tolerance is more strict. This video explains it: ruclips.net/video/aw5EK5U0Vb8/видео.html
Another video with different applications for runout and position: ruclips.net/video/Y4woF-aE2Xo/видео.html
I got more clarity on topic
I am now total
perpendicularity and total runout are not the same at 90 degrees to your datum axis. Perpendicularity refers to an angle measured in degrees rotationally (360 degrees) where total runout is measured linearly as mm or in as a surface function (in a straight line 180 degrees)....sorry dude RIP
Perpendicularity tolerance on a surface is never in degrees units. Its always distance units (between two parallel planes). This can be verified with a dial indicator. Per ASME Y14.5-2018:
9.3.2 Orientation Tolerance
An orientation tolerance specifies:
(a) a tolerance zone defined by two parallel planes at
the specified basic angle from, parallel to, or perpendicular
to one or more datum planes or datum axes, within which
the surface, axis, or center plane of the considered feature
shall be contained. See Figures 9-1 through 9-7.