DNA Test for a Poodle
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
- The plaintiff bought a puppy from the defendant under the assumption that the dog was a purebred poodle. The plaintiff gave the dog a DNA test, and the results showed the pet was not actually pure poodle, so she’s suing for the cost of the dog and vet bills. The defendant argues she gave the dog’s parents a DNA test, and they were pure poodle. She’s countersuing for lost wages and caregiver fees.
She shouldn’t be able to keep the dog and get the money. That’s insane
Agree 💯. I’m actually surprised she got to keep the dog.
Right give the dog back wtf
The judge didn’t explicitly say if the dog needed to be returned….. maybe the defendant gets clarification after the show 🤔
Right! Judge Judy would be like return the dog 🤷🏽♀️
@@esilsyeah that’s how it goes. I was on this show before when they had a live audience
Im with the defendant on this one... she seems sincere and should have at least got the dog back
Morals have nothing to do with the law. Her being kind is no reason to return the dog and she didn’t request for the dog back
I don’t think she should get her money back if she gets to keep the dog.
I agree. The court sees animals as property so that would be like someone buying a glass table and they get a wood table and then they get to keep it. That would never happen. She should've paid something
She couldn't prove that the parents were pure bred. Stop telling people you're breeding pure bred dogs.
They did this to my daughter. She was looking for a toy poodle turned out the dog is a standard. She loves her dog but like you said they need to stop doing this because a lot of dogs will end up in shelters.
How’re you mad at someone bc you tried to run game and got caught😂😂😂
Precisely!!🤣🤣🤣
EXACTLY!! 👏
Right 😂😂😂
That part
“She didn’t do her due diligence to allow me to do my due diligence to…” WTF??? So you need someone to TELL YOU what the moral and ethical thing to do is 🤦♀️
The defendant is a liar. Plain and simple. Unfortunately for her the plaintiff had ample proof and evidence.
Oh come on. You KNOW you want to say she only lost because she's black...
Your followers expect a certain amount of hate and foul comments from you. That's your whole get down!
I don't agree with this ruling
The announcer " the DNA determined that was a lie" 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂😂
If I had a nickel for every time someone says “I’m a single mom😢😢😢”…
Right like that has anything to do with the plaintiff?!
Exactly! They use that as an excuse for absolutely everything! They act like that's some sort of disability when at the end of the day it's really a choice that they made, especially when they can't seem to keep their legs closed! Ooops! 🤭🤭🤭
The DOG game crazy
Mathis is wrong here, those tests are only like 70% accurate.
That's not right how she gets to keep the dog and the money smh
What JM was saying sarcastically about the plaintiff was true 😂😂😂
Is she got her money back she would’ve returned the dog. And how do we know it was the dog she purchased from the defendant that was tested? The defendant said she tried to resolve the matter and the play didn’t deny it at the end of the case.
I just realized that JM doesn't really do dog cases like JJ and the people court. I wish people would pick animals that need a home before making more.
I agree with the ruling. If she wants a mixed breed dog she could have gone to the county shelter and paid $50, not $1,500
Another reason you should adopt and not shop
So why didn’t she let her DNA test the dog to see if it was the dog she sold her? She should’ve given the dog back if she’s asking for a refund. She should’ve known to go to reputable breeders with AKC papers instead of Craigslist breeders. Judge Mathis makes his mind up before even hearing the evidence.
Why do crooks always cry and mention their kids when they are proven to be dishonest.
That old lady was so wrong she could have let the other lady do an DNA test. And not bring her to court. I feel that other lady so unnecessary
So JM let the lady have the dog for free bc she looks like a nice person. Got it.
Yea… she shouldn’t be able to keep the dog and the money. That’s not fair as a return.
Sorry, I think JM missed it on this one. Besides mocking the defendant, he misunderstood the pure blood aspect. The defendants test results did show her dogs as being pure poodle, just variant of poodle. Just like the plaintiff said she had through the years. He was very dismissive and didn't listen to everything on this one.
So she gets money and a free dog that she has said over and over that she didn’t want because it’s allegedly not 100% poodle like it’s giving scam on the plaintiffs part
I don’t agree with this ruling. She never proved the dog that was tested came from the defendant.
I love dogs 🐕 and cats 🐈
Did she claim the parents were pure? So? That don’t mean you sold her a pure breed. Scammer stop!
She just got a free dog... that ain't right!!!! I disagree with this judgement JM!!!!!!😮😢😅
Seller knew it wasn’t a pure breed dog, so she gets whatever complications in her life because of it. She’s the cause of all her problems.
all that crying dont mean a thing. You advertise 100% poodle and it was not 100%. The customer has the right to sue for their money, the do not have to deal with you.
Save your tears 😭 for another day
I have no sympathy for anyone who goes on the Judge Mathis show post 2020 and think he's going to be fair to them. Know where you going before you go. Do your research.
Mathis was wrong on several levels. First, little old church looking ladies are not all honest. Second, if the defendant was willing to pay for a DNA test to make sure the dog came from her liter, then why wouldn't the plaintiff agree. And third, the defendant agreed to refund the plaintiff's money if she returned the dog. So, Mathis is allowing the plaintiff to keep the dog and get her money back? So, the "little old church lady" did run a scam on the defendant who is now out of her dog and out of her money.
Why does she get to keep the dog AND the money ?!? TF
Never compete with false narratives that people have about you. Don’t try to prove them wrong. Allow God, time, and fruit to fight your battles for you. Be quiet. Stop worrying. Do not fear. Get in the presence of God. Get to work. Be great.✨
Victor M. Jackson
Amen
Return the dog
That dog momma was CHEATING!!! 💯💯 wow 😯 I pray God blessed that single mother with her money back xs 10.
Does the black bald dude work for the show??? He always there🤣🤣🤣
He’s a friend of JM Nephew he said that on the show before
The rest of them are always there also
I absolutely love puppies and poodles! 🤗🐩🙏🏾
Damn. Instead of choosing to be kind and solve this out of court, poor girl was dragged with her.
I have to have all my dogs DNA certified with all litters. It's extremely funny how in the United States new born babies aren't held to the same standards. They allow women to mislead men all the time with no consequences. 🤨
It's not funny. Women aren't dogs weirdo.
There go judge Mathis again ruling on feelings not law.
She bought a puppy from somebody. It must be collateral damage never buy pets that you don’t know nothing about.
She shouldn’t have been allowed to keep the dog. Her saying she wanted a pure breed dog she’ll probably sell it and get a double payout.
I'm here My Beloved Favorite Judge ***ASHAY ***
to this day i dont know what that means 😂
@@bear3279no one does
@@bear3279it’s supposed to be “Asé” which is basically a salute or giving energy to something or someone. It’s from Yoruba culture.
Crocodile tears as usual😂😂
In my opinion, this should've been handled on Maury Povich.
They should have bought the Dog's baby daddy 🐕 to court
The defendant is a gorgeous 😍 bbw
🙄🙄🙄🙄 omg really “my dog is damn near the same age as me now and I’m seeing that it’s really pit bull” lol NEXT!!!
Hope she gets dog back since she gotta pay
When you have anything miniature, it is a mix. To get them to toy or cup size you need to use an Italian greyhound or Chihuahua. So you will see that in the DNA. AKC will recognize that is a Prue bread basic on percentage. That breeder isn't exactly wrong she she lack knowledge on how to explain herself. A standard of any breed should be 100%.
This makes sense.
Runnnnnnnning game😂
Honestly this entire case was grossly handled. The evidence wasn't shown at all nor was their enough information to make a ruling. There is no proof that the dna tested is this puppy at all, dna tests can have inaccuracy's especially depending on the brand/panel used (which arent stated here), and the breeders dogs WERE BOTH poodles the percentage of sizing doesn't apply to make them a different breed. The lady bought a poodle as the breeder advertised. The judge immediately was on the elderly ladies side for 'being an innocent elderly christian lady', saying its basically unfathomable that someone would go to court over 2k when people go to court for $100 and dont bat an eye, talking/yelling over the breeder as she was trying to tell him what page the percentages were on and then to award the puppy AND money to the lady? How is that at all fair when the breeder even stated she is out costs due to this, boarding her dogs to be here for this etc.
While I don't agree with this breeders breeding practices as it is confirmed she is not a reputable or ethical breeder and some of her statements were clearly a bit messy this case was simply mishandled and its a shame to see. The breeder was respectful, tried to be understanding, tried to talk this through this with the client before it got to this, tried to give her a resolution that was fair (money given for return of the dog), offered to pay for a dna test, and simply asked for proof that the dna test was from this dog (which anyone SHOULD be asking for) and wasnt provided that. The breeder clearly cared and was trying, the puppy buyer was a nightmare after some money- and sadly she got it.
EDIT TO ADD: Upon looking up this breeder unfortunately I was correct about her being reputable and ethically breeding, she does not health test, she breeds for colour, is not registered, doesn't title or show any of her dogs, breeds for pets only, doesn't puppy culture and is now mixing poodles with havanese to sell for higher profits.
Don’t start crying And playing the single mom card please!
Wtf she crying for grow up 😂
No dog is 100% plaintiff is an a hole fog should go back why get both.
Girl 👻
First🎉🎉🎉
lame