The 360 will work, but it's just going to let a little more gas out. In 300 Blk, it's not that bad as their subsonic loads are very low powder charges. The Law of Conservation of Mass relates the gas has to equal the powder charge. It just matters how many Mols of gas (volume) will equal the Mols of solid powder (mass). They are not an exact correlation as some powders make more volume for equal Mols. Nevertheless, a good rule of thumb is less powder is going to be less volume in the can. BUT! A reason can always be found for another can. Oh, I know this too well.
@@trober1104 I would get the TBAC 22 Take-Down for the 22, the SilencerCo Omega 9K for the EPC (or just use your Rugged 360) and a YHM Turbo T3 or Otter Creek Polonium for the 556.
@@seanmtactical6069 nice thank you for the road map!! Hope you are doing well out in MO. You were the one that put my 300 upper together and my EPC upper. They are still running strong.
I won a TBAC certificate for a straight up free can. That's how I got the Dominus. They are expensive and have a different mount. I really like it a lot, but it's not a massive jump from the CB mounted cans in a bolt gun. In the semi's it's the ticket. I really want get one of their new cans with the muzzle brake on the end of it and test it. That might be in the future.
Just got a nee B&T Rotex C with SF Compatible hub. It was 739 so I thought I'd try one since I have a few surefire cans and majority of my guns have surefire muzzle.devices. well checked alignment on my.guns and all.was good, however hub was super tight on all guns until it wouldn't come off. These were al clean and lubed muzzle devices abs new unfired can. I called B&T and the CS is abysmal and terrible. They gave me an RMA but I paid the 45$ to ship it. They had it a month and never gave me feedback or replied to my weekly emails. Finally got it last Friday. Still kinda tight going on and off. Needless to say regardless the performance which I know is good, I won't be purchasing anything B&T related again.
That's very disappointing to hear. All the B&Ts I've been able to inspect have been really nice and I haven't received any negative feedback from their owners. The product has a lot going for it. I hope this was a one-off situation or they get their shit straight. Their can has a lot going for it.
@seanmtactical6069 I'm a surefire guy but was hoping on this and first B&T can so. I. Hoping for performance but their CS absolutely blows! And they don't care about it either.
🇺🇸🗽
I purchased the Rugged Alaskan 360. I like it so far but now I’m thinking I need one for my 300blk out.
The 360 will work, but it's just going to let a little more gas out. In 300 Blk, it's not that bad as their subsonic loads are very low powder charges. The Law of Conservation of Mass relates the gas has to equal the powder charge. It just matters how many Mols of gas (volume) will equal the Mols of solid powder (mass). They are not an exact correlation as some powders make more volume for equal Mols. Nevertheless, a good rule of thumb is less powder is going to be less volume in the can. BUT! A reason can always be found for another can. Oh, I know this too well.
@@seanmtactical6069 haha! yeah I want a 9mm can for my EPC-9, a 22 can and a 556 can. It's just hard to put down $1700 for a Thunder Beast.
@@trober1104 I would get the TBAC 22 Take-Down for the 22, the SilencerCo Omega 9K for the EPC (or just use your Rugged 360) and a YHM Turbo T3 or Otter Creek Polonium for the 556.
@@seanmtactical6069 nice thank you for the road map!! Hope you are doing well out in MO. You were the one that put my 300 upper together and my EPC upper. They are still running strong.
I saw you using a Thunderbeast Dominus in this video. I have a bunch of Thunderbeast CB mount guns already. How do you like the Dominus?
I won a TBAC certificate for a straight up free can. That's how I got the Dominus. They are expensive and have a different mount. I really like it a lot, but it's not a massive jump from the CB mounted cans in a bolt gun. In the semi's it's the ticket. I really want get one of their new cans with the muzzle brake on the end of it and test it. That might be in the future.
Just got a nee B&T Rotex C with SF Compatible hub. It was 739 so I thought I'd try one since I have a few surefire cans and majority of my guns have surefire muzzle.devices. well checked alignment on my.guns and all.was good, however hub was super tight on all guns until it wouldn't come off. These were al clean and lubed muzzle devices abs new unfired can. I called B&T and the CS is abysmal and terrible. They gave me an RMA but I paid the 45$ to ship it. They had it a month and never gave me feedback or replied to my weekly emails. Finally got it last Friday. Still kinda tight going on and off. Needless to say regardless the performance which I know is good, I won't be purchasing anything B&T related again.
That's very disappointing to hear. All the B&Ts I've been able to inspect have been really nice and I haven't received any negative feedback from their owners. The product has a lot going for it. I hope this was a one-off situation or they get their shit straight. Their can has a lot going for it.
@seanmtactical6069 I'm a surefire guy but was hoping on this and first B&T can so. I. Hoping for performance but their CS absolutely blows! And they don't care about it either.