As mentioned in this episode, going to work accompanied by a male seems to be a hurdle for women who have lost their husbands, even though they have to work to support their children. On a different note, I didn't expect that the topics in this episode would go from Afghanistan's oppressed women to the car industry in the UK, to the analysis of how French people perceive the new season of Emily in Paris. I really enjoyed them. When I first watched Emily in Paris, I was a bit concerned about how it might come across to French viewers. Having only seen the first season, I didn’t realize that since then, French actors have started using more French, and there’s been a shift in how French audiences perceive the show.
Great podcast, as always! However, I feel I need to call this out. In this report, you had a journalist covering cars but he doesn't have a driver's license. In the previous report, the journalist covering pets doesn't own a pet. Seems a bit sloppy considering The Economist's standards.
Why do you keep saying cheap china cars? Those junks are 1st not cheap at all, lots of people still can't afford that, 2nd, what else can Uk do, does it have a car industry just to make its own cars, let alone to compete?
Also UK is okay with Chinese cars and the review is by someone who doesn't even have a licence to drive? Really? Seems like you need to cut the number of episodes you do, you are running out of depth here 😂
Anyone else has the impression that the video would have been better showing the footage of the interview in the first segment and not the same cover image?
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
As mentioned in this episode, going to work accompanied by a male seems to be a hurdle for women who have lost their husbands, even though they have to work to support their children.
On a different note, I didn't expect that the topics in this episode would go from Afghanistan's oppressed women to the car industry in the UK, to the analysis of how French people perceive the new season of Emily in Paris.
I really enjoyed them.
When I first watched Emily in Paris, I was a bit concerned about how it might come across to French viewers.
Having only seen the first season, I didn’t realize that since then, French actors have started using more French, and there’s been a shift in how French audiences perceive the show.
Great podcast, as always! However, I feel I need to call this out. In this report, you had a journalist covering cars but he doesn't have a driver's license. In the previous report, the journalist covering pets doesn't own a pet. Seems a bit sloppy considering The Economist's standards.
Why do you keep saying cheap china cars? Those junks are 1st not cheap at all, lots of people still can't afford that, 2nd, what else can Uk do, does it have a car industry just to make its own cars, let alone to compete?
Also UK is okay with Chinese cars and the review is by someone who doesn't even have a licence to drive? Really? Seems like you need to cut the number of episodes you do, you are running out of depth here 😂
Anyone else has the impression that the video would have been better showing the footage of the interview in the first segment and not the same cover image?
No