Listen more carefully; all the information is given in the video. You can lead an old donkey to water, but you can't make it drink. Your inability to take in what she is saying isn't her fault.
I know a family member that attended a seminar by the new Labour minister for health on the plans for reform. It was attended by NHS veterans and medical academics. He would have been laughed out of the building if his plans hadn't been so embarrassing. Their plans are akin to adults believing in magic.
If builders can't keep up with demand now how are they going to suddenly get thousands more trades men to build these homes? We have had 200 homes built in our village now every time it rains sewage floods down the street. No locals can afford them , 100 more cars parked all over as no public transport , the local hospital has been down graded. Get the infrastructure built first,then immigration under control, people skilled up, then think about building.
So lets build on the green belt 🤔Noooooo! where I live we have had nearly 1000 more homes built and our local roads and services simply cannot cope so ‘lets build more’ 😮
WE Will build 1.5 million houses over the Next 5yrs= 300.000 per year =1.190 average per day of a 5 day working Week. And some say Mice have Ambitions.
Good idea to build, I seem to remember John Prescott, gave planning permission to build on 'flood plains', that worked out well didn't it, when it rained and there was no where for the water to go, excpt in people's homes...
You didn't hear the part where she said the government won't be building houses, then? You didn't hear the part where she said the private sector will build the houses, then? It's almost as if you didn't watch the video.
@@GetKingShorty exactly to many homeless in our society needing homes also people needing homes to start there familes. Illegals first on the lists our own bottom of the lists. Same with the NHS illegals get treated as priority.
We ve had new houses built. A new school… but there were no teachers for it so they closed the older one. No new drs surgery… but then anyway where would the actual staff come to fill it. You can build a new hospital, but you need staff / drs etc
The idea is to make housing more affordable overall. Asylum seekers are a scapegoat - they only account for about 10% of immigration and we don't even know how many of those are actually eligible for asylum because the last government just refused to process them and put them in hotels/on rickety barges / other deathtraps instead. Most of the immigrants are either skilled workers we need to prevent the NHS collapsing or people paying to study here (who one might presume will either leave after their studies, or remain having become highly skilled and educated and presumably quite valuable to the economy as a result.
@@jhonbus Asylum seekers are claiming the resources that should go to British people, Not greedy foreigners who have come from safe countries. Most immigrants are nothing close to being skilled, and their dependents are usually economically inactive. The claim that the NHS can only survive with a cowardly immigration policy is insulting to people of average intelligence. Don't waste our time.
@@jhonbus Your points are wrong. The vast majority of immigrants are students or low skilled. If you leftists were serious about ending the housing shortage you'd be against mass migration. Cutting demand is easier than supply.
Attacking our most vulnerable in our society our severe disabled and severe mentally ill is a discrimination at the highest lvl. We need to protect and make sure our most vulnerable in society get the help and support they need and that's not work there not able to do and if not work loosing there help and support that they need is a terrible way to treat them. Will we see this go on and see the future of familes and friends loose loved ones through suicides through growing pressure and refusing help and support needed.
I’m not a nimby, but these homes are not going to help, as they are not council houses they will be on the market and as usual in the end they will belong to rich peoples property portfollios. We need 5 million council homes built, rent controls, house price regulation ensuring housing inflation is frozen so eventually people will be able to buy homes.they have failed to explain what are social rents and the terms?
Labour's building programme will see huge swathes of our countryside, food production land and habitat concreted over by major corporations (how much do they give to Labour in donations?) with their poorly built, ticky tacky houses. This will increase our carbon emissions (when we are going net zero), we will have to import more food, water attenuation issues, more land fills and reservoirs will be needed, more pressure on local infrastructure, more light pollution etc. etc. The agricultural value of the land needs to be considered before being built on. If Covid19 has taught us anything, it is the need for food security, for now and future generations. Is there an end in site, a plan, or is it just build, build build? When the main stream media, greens and left, all obsessed with oil, finally wake up to this environmental damage, it will be too late.
@@seldenkovs the government is the most inefficient spender in the economy, that is what is wrong with it. Without enterprise, there are no taxes, that is the second issue with economies that becomes too socialist
@@vvwalker7261 Although you are correct about corporation taxes, if those rise too much large businesses will go elsewhere. Important to remember that about 60% of UK economy are SMEs, as such higher corporation tax will not have that damaging of an effect (it's not so easy for SMEs to relocate to Ireland). And to compare: Sweden seems to be doing alright with high taxes, quite a prosperous nation. UPD: My bad, SMEs don't account for 60% of economy. So point on corp. tax is valid.
Forget excuses for the past and slogans for the future… success is based on actual measurable results in increased investment and growth. 3-4 levels of government in the UK is sapping productivity as invested money disappears into pockets of local authority leaders, CEOs, metro mayors, devolved government officials and multiple levels of out-sourced works and services of their pet projects.
Thank the Lord on infrastructure, but this is only infrastructure what is the growth strategy through innovation and large high skilled jobs. The infrastructure industry needs resources to execute the work, this means foreign skilled workers which currently is an inhibitor of the works. The whole supply chain is back logged, it is encouraging to see key projects being prioritised but the need to examine the value chain is key.
5 years of hard labour starts now. 4 million minimum maybe 6 or 7 million extra people to come in over 5 years 2 million extra homes required minimum . we have incredibly ambitious plans to build 1.5 million homes ,good luck with that ,yet we are going to be worse off as that doesnt even house the immigrants .House prices will go up again .This is the idiot policies of a party that couldnt plan next weeks shopping.
@@ssuwandi3240 Probably because the NHS is the responsibility of Wes Streeting. The NHS is 50% of the UK's growth potential? You'll have to explain that bizarre claim.
@@gio-oz8gf Absolutely, historically 50%- of UK Govt revenue came from, am not saying the bottom line profits esp with 6 million illegals who ate the free cakes. Now the Home Sec also seems to have no plans to deport.
@@dianerogers8805 Oh dear. Touched a nerve….my reference was to the way the gov are going to sweep away entrenched systems ala Thatcher, so back in your box ;)
She is full of onshore wind.
All a loud of bullshit and lies
i'm with you
that's a sound bet.
She's just like starmer and even sounds like him,turn that auto que off and she's stumped.
Keep deleting my posts RUclips, and I'll just edit the original, making the entire thread the contextless and worthless argument that it is.
Listen more carefully; all the information is given in the video. You can lead an old donkey to water, but you can't make it drink. Your inability to take in what she is saying isn't her fault.
I know a family member that attended a seminar by the new Labour minister for health on the plans for reform. It was attended by NHS veterans and medical academics. He would have been laughed out of the building if his plans hadn't been so embarrassing. Their plans are akin to adults believing in magic.
@@gio-oz8gf Your inability to detect sarcasm will probably get you in trouble one of these days. Luckily for you I couldnt care less what you think.
Slums? council run flop houses ,doss houses how right you are.
Yeah, because we all prefer if people are homeless, eh?.
If builders can't keep up with demand now how are they going to suddenly get thousands more trades men to build these homes? We have had 200 homes built in our village now every time it rains sewage floods down the street. No locals can afford them , 100 more cars parked all over as no public transport , the local hospital has been down graded. Get the infrastructure built first,then immigration under control, people skilled up, then think about building.
@jablot5054 700 tradesman just rocked up yesterday in Dover. That's how
So they can build on greenbelt for immigrants and wind turbines. Bye bye British country side.
What about new Hospitals?
@@grahampayne8376 Nah, Blair and Brown flogged off the buildings long ago. Don't need more.
So lets build on the green belt 🤔Noooooo! where I live we have had nearly 1000 more homes built and our local roads and services simply cannot cope so ‘lets build more’ 😮
WE
Will build 1.5 million houses over the Next 5yrs= 300.000 per year =1.190 average per day of a 5 day working Week.
And some say Mice have Ambitions.
exactly,
@@qetoun Doesn't help when 750,000 new Africans and Asians arrive every year.
Good idea to build, I seem to remember John Prescott, gave planning permission to build on 'flood plains', that worked out well didn't it, when it rained and there was no where for the water to go, excpt in people's homes...
Bla bla bla heard it all before.
More spending more borrowing budget cuts
You didn't hear the part where she said the government won't be building houses, then? You didn't hear the part where she said the private sector will build the houses, then? It's almost as if you didn't watch the video.
They're going to have to get £££ from somewhere.
End the right to buy, its not working
Need more homes for more immigrants labour will let in.
@@GetKingShorty exactly to many homeless in our society needing homes also people needing homes to start there familes. Illegals first on the lists our own bottom of the lists. Same with the NHS illegals get treated as priority.
We ve had new houses built. A new school… but there were no teachers for it so they closed the older one. No new drs surgery… but then anyway where would the actual staff come to fill it. You can build a new hospital, but you need staff / drs etc
Who pays?
The government has no other income other than tax. Just since you apparently didn't know that.
Well Singapore Govt has.
It's called Temasek Digital
magic money tree
You don't deserve an answer; she's already told you. Pay attention.
@@jane9875 Someone else who doesn't listen.
Good grief she's bolshy calm down love its only day two
You should look up the meaning of bolshy. There was nothing bolshy about her behaviour.
Who is going to pay for the 1.5 million new houses and who is going to get them (for free)?
Dream, Dream on
Starmers copied the Biden Democrats
It's not going to work Stsrmer lolol
There are planning regulations for a reason , which seems to be way beyond her intelligence
Building these 1.5 million houses
Can ordinary working class afford to buy?
What percentage will be put aside for asylum seekers and social housing
Because asylum seekers are on the 'at risk' list they go straight to the top.
Building 1.5 million homes in five years.
But 750,000 Africans and Asians arrive every year.
The numbers don't match.
The idea is to make housing more affordable overall.
Asylum seekers are a scapegoat - they only account for about 10% of immigration and we don't even know how many of those are actually eligible for asylum because the last government just refused to process them and put them in hotels/on rickety barges / other deathtraps instead.
Most of the immigrants are either skilled workers we need to prevent the NHS collapsing or people paying to study here (who one might presume will either leave after their studies, or remain having become highly skilled and educated and presumably quite valuable to the economy as a result.
@@jhonbus Asylum seekers are claiming the resources that should go to British people, Not greedy foreigners who have come from safe countries. Most immigrants are nothing close to being skilled, and their dependents are usually economically inactive. The claim that the NHS can only survive with a cowardly immigration policy is insulting to people of average intelligence. Don't waste our time.
@@jhonbus Your points are wrong. The vast majority of immigrants are students or low skilled. If you leftists were serious about ending the housing shortage you'd be against mass migration. Cutting demand is easier than supply.
Attacking our most vulnerable in our society our severe disabled and severe mentally ill is a discrimination at the highest lvl. We need to protect and make sure our most vulnerable in society get the help and support they need and that's not work there not able to do and if not work loosing there help and support that they need is a terrible way to treat them. Will we see this go on and see the future of familes and friends loose loved ones through suicides through growing pressure and refusing help and support needed.
I’m not a nimby, but these homes are not going to help, as they are not council houses they will be on the market and as usual in the end they will belong to rich peoples property portfollios. We need 5 million council homes built, rent controls, house price regulation ensuring housing inflation is frozen so eventually people will be able to buy homes.they have failed to explain what are social rents and the terms?
Taking any say away from local communities to start a free for all for developers. Unsustainable growth.
Labour's building programme will see huge swathes of our countryside, food production land and habitat concreted over by major corporations (how much do they give to Labour in donations?) with their poorly built, ticky tacky houses. This will increase our carbon emissions (when we are going net zero), we will have to import more food, water attenuation issues, more land fills and reservoirs will be needed, more pressure on local infrastructure, more light pollution etc. etc. The agricultural value of the land needs to be considered before being built on. If Covid19 has taught us anything, it is the need for food security, for now and future generations. Is there an end in site, a plan, or is it just build, build build? When the main stream media, greens and left, all obsessed with oil, finally wake up to this environmental damage, it will be too late.
How that's going to happen, there's hundreds of quangos out there, in the building industry, planning, etc most of them set up under Labour ,
And our tax will go sky high to pay for it
@@davidmorris9661 Don't see any thing bad in that. As long as our taxes are actually going towards those goals
@@seldenkovs the government is the most inefficient spender in the economy, that is what is wrong with it. Without enterprise, there are no taxes, that is the second issue with economies that becomes too socialist
@@vvwalker7261 Although you are correct about corporation taxes, if those rise too much large businesses will go elsewhere. Important to remember that about 60% of UK economy are SMEs, as such higher corporation tax will not have that damaging of an effect (it's not so easy for SMEs to relocate to Ireland).
And to compare: Sweden seems to be doing alright with high taxes, quite a prosperous nation.
UPD: My bad, SMEs don't account for 60% of economy. So point on corp. tax is valid.
@@seldenkovs High taxes on people and businesses means less spending and less demand...where's the 'Grrwwth' from that?
@@qetoun The point/ideology of Labour is in taxing the rich and the profitable companies, is it not?
Yay...and dont forget to continue to send more money and weapons to Ukraine, Russia must be stopped
Forget excuses for the past and slogans for the future… success is based on actual measurable results in increased investment and growth. 3-4 levels of government in the UK is sapping productivity as invested money disappears into pockets of local authority leaders, CEOs, metro mayors, devolved government officials and multiple levels of out-sourced works and services of their pet projects.
joke
It is neither difficult nor complicated, copy Switzerland.
Absolute weapon..
Now THAT sounds like economic stability!
talk is cheap.
Sounds expensive.......
Must thousands of jobs out there to employ all schools doctors hospitals
Thank the Lord on infrastructure, but this is only infrastructure what is the growth strategy through innovation and large high skilled jobs. The infrastructure industry needs resources to execute the work, this means foreign skilled workers which currently is an inhibitor of the works. The whole supply chain is back logged, it is encouraging to see key projects being prioritised but the need to examine the value chain is key.
yea .. the single is build on green belt
5 years of hard labour starts now. 4 million minimum maybe 6 or 7 million extra people to come in over 5 years 2 million extra homes required minimum . we have incredibly ambitious plans to build 1.5 million homes ,good luck with that ,yet we are going to be worse off as that doesnt even house the immigrants .House prices will go up again .This is the idiot policies of a party that couldnt plan next weeks shopping.
More lies
Ah another task force 😔
Out of their depth.
Don't be rude.
Conservatives were drowning
No single point made for the NHS growth platform. That's 50%+ of UK revenue growth potential.
@@ssuwandi3240 Probably because the NHS is the responsibility of Wes Streeting. The NHS is 50% of the UK's growth potential? You'll have to explain that bizarre claim.
@@gio-oz8gf Absolutely, historically 50%- of UK Govt revenue came from, am not saying the bottom line profits esp with 6 million illegals who ate the free cakes. Now the Home Sec also seems to have no plans to deport.
Labour will build 1,500,000 homes in five years.
But there are 750,000 Africans and Asians arriving every year.
The numbers don't match.
@@FredScuttle456 Figures done by Diane Abbot ?
An actual strategic plan... In government... Never thought I'd see the day!
so far its all talk.
what you going to do about immigrants
They've just said 🖕 to NIMBYS 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
the only way to do that is to remove ALL democratic oversight into planning.
*Private homes or Council, social housing?*
Do you people understand plain English or not? She clearly answered that question, at least twice.
No, for the new African and Asian Labour voters.
750,000 arrive year on year.
smart women
Thatcher’s back….
Don't insult Mrs Thatcher, she would not be fit to clean Maggies shoes.
@@dianerogers8805 Oh dear. Touched a nerve….my reference was to the way the gov are going to sweep away entrenched systems ala Thatcher, so back in your box ;)
@@wavehuntersjapan Oh touched a nerve there have i.bit patronising, typical leftie 🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴🏴
she''s channelling LIz Truss
get back in your stupid box