this series is a binge watch....what an amazing series....Hari Bol.....thank you so much KC talks for taking this up and letting us know the Bhagwad Gita from HG Keshavanand Prabhuji ....aapko dandwat pranaam
Ye anubhavi nahi hai pls samjho. Ye sirf theoretical refrences deta rehta hai. Kabhi is kitab se kabhi dusri kitab se. Apne ander us parmatma ko dekho bhaio. Mera aap logo se koi shikwa nahi hai. Par aap log apne ander ki gehrai me utarna hi nahi chahte. Is pakhandi ye tak keha diya ki dhyan se koi parmatma tak nahi pahuch sakta. Agar aisa hi hota to krishna na dhyan vidhi kyu batayi. Maharshi patanjali ne kyu batayi. Ye apne aap ko itna samajhta hai kya. Ye hai kya jo itne badw mahatmaho ki baato ko fail kar raha hai. Pakhandi hai ye fir sun lo. Bar bar kahunha.
23:59 Krishna never explicitly claimed that Shiva, Durga, Kali, Ganesh, etc., are the devas (your labeled demigods) I'm referring to in this verse or they fall in the category of devas. What is That Avidhipurvakam? He didn't explicitly mentioned that as well in BG; it is inadequate to claim that all other methods of worship is explicitly Trutipurn. Who said that their abodes' individuals are subject to birth and death? Maa Durga, Maa Kali, Lord Shiva themselves proclaim in their scriptures that they are the bestowers of liberation (mukti dayak) and auspiciousness (mangal dayak). Where did Krishna asked everybody to treat them (shiva, durga, kali) as his servants Alone? Sectarianism and fanaticism have made you people Blind. According to your sectarian political claims, Ved Vyas perhaps has been proven a liar, a deluder, who wrote Devi Bhagwatam and Shiv Mahapuran, as well as all those great devotees who saw Devi Maa face to face, talked to her just like you and me personally, still proclaimed that He who is Krishna is the same Kali, the same Shiva, and the same Rama with infinite names, the same One Satchidananda. Clear my doubts by declaring those devotees (or whatever you may label them) as deluders or mentally unstable or any label you wish. I will bow down to you and move away quietly. I have mentioned this Tale thousands of times, but this time, I will explain the complete narrative. Read with open eyes and an open mind - Once upon a time, there were four blind individuals who had never encountered an elephant before. They were curious to understand what an elephant was like. Through divine intervention, the blind men were granted a once in a lifetime opportunity to feel the elephant for few moments. When they reached the elephant, they began exploring it by touching it with their hands. The first blind person touched the elephant's leg and exclaimed, "An elephant is like a sturdy pillar!" The second blind person touched the elephant's tail and said, "No, no! An elephant is like a rope, thin and flexible!" The third blind person touched the elephant's trunk and insisted, "You are both mistaken. An elephant is like a long tube or a snake!" The fourth blind person touched the elephant's side and declared, "You are all wrong. An elephant is like a giant wall!" Each blind person had a different perception based on the part of the elephant they touched, and they strongly believed their own interpretation to be the Sole Truth. They started arguing, each defending their own understanding and dismissing others' perspectives. Upon witnessing this, someone (perhaps a paramhansa) who could see approached them and explained, "All of you are partially correct. The elephant is a combination of all these aspects - the legs, the tail, the trunk, and the side. None of you has the complete picture unless you consider all the parts together." If it seems logical to you, you may contemplate this Tale or reject it as a Tamasic Tale. If their worship alone, whom you consider demigods, will not lead me to moksha, alright, I'm perfectly fine with no liberation. But I will not change my Ishta for mere benefits. Whatever my Ishta may give me or may not, I will accept that as a blessing, as my fate, even if that is Rasatal. Still, I will pray that he alone may remain my Ishta for eternity, wherever and whenever I may take birth. Because I have accepted him alone as my Ishta (after much testing!) and I know that he is one with all other forms and names of Satchidananda. He who is described in the Vedas is also described in the Tantras and the Puranas. All of them speak about the one Satchidananda. The Nitya and the Lila are the two aspects of the one Reality. It is described in the Vedas as 'Om Satchidananda Brahman,' in the Tantras as 'Om Satchidananda Siva,' the ever-pure Siva, and in the Puranas as 'Om Satchidananda Krishna.' That which is Brahman is also Kali, the Adyasakti, who creates, preserves, and destroys the universe. He who is Krishna is the same as Kali. The root is one - all these are His sport and play. All the scriptures, the Vedas, the Puranas, and the Tantras, speak only of one Satchidananda. According to Devi Purana, Kāli Herself has become Krishna. But what difference does it make? God is infinite, and infinite are the ways to reach Him. But if he's offended by my faith, if it seems Adharma in his eyes, then may he erase my existence completely as nothing is impossible for your Godhead Krishna!
The word "avidhipurvakam" is clearly mentioned in the sloka. lord krishna Bg. 7.7 मत्त: परतरं नान्यत्किञ्चिदस्ति धनञ्जय । मयि सर्वमिदं प्रोतं सूत्रे मणिगणा इव ॥ ७ ॥ O conqueror of wealth, there is no truth superior to Me. Everything rests upon Me, as pearls are strung on a thread. Īśo 15 hiraṇmayena pātreṇa satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee. Bg. 5.29 भोक्तारं यज्ञतपसां सर्वलोकमहेश्वरम् । सुहृदं सर्वभूतानां ज्ञात्वा मां शान्तिमृच्छति ॥ २९ ॥ A person in full consciousness of Me, knowing Me to be the ultimate beneficiary of all sacrifices and austerities, the Supreme Lord of all planets and demigods, and the benefactor and well-wisher of all living entities, attains peace from the pangs of material miseries. Bg. 14.27 ब्रह्मणो हि प्रतिष्ठाहममृतस्याव्ययस्य च । शाश्वतस्य च धर्मस्य सुखस्यैकान्तिकस्य च ॥ २७ ॥ And I am the basis of the impersonal Brahman, which is immortal, imperishable and eternal and is the constitutional position of ultimate happiness.
@@sambalghale7313 I simply asked what exact Vidhi is being considered Avidhi. Krishna didn't mention that; it is now you people who are considering all other methods, except yours, as Avidhi. The rest is your sectarianism and the attitude of those blind individuals. Pranam. Here are a few insights that should be contemplated upon only by spiritual seekers, not believers, not textbook reader fanatics! • All troubles come to an end when the ego dies. The truth is that you cannot attain God if you have even a trace of desire. It matters less, what a man worships than in what spirit he worships. Seeing God leads automatically to a recognition of His oneness. Infinity cannot be multiplied. There cannot be more than one Infinite Being. Deity with form and formless, personal and impersonal, manifested and unmanifested - all must be contained in that Being. • Sunlight is one and the same wherever it falls, but only bright surfaces like clear water, mirrors, and polished metals can reflect it fully. So is the Light Divine. It falls equally and impartially on all hearts, but only the pure and clean hearts of the good and holy ones can fully reflect it (Sectarians and People with Agendas won't!) • The fabled musk deer searches the world over for the source of the scent that comes from itself. Bhakti is the one essential thing. To be sure, God exists in all beings. Who, then is a devotee? He whose mind dwells on God. But this is not possible as long as one has egotism and vanity. The water of God's grace cannot collect on the high mound of egotism. It runs down. • God is not only inside us; he is both inside and outside. Everything is chaitanya, Consciousness. The aim of spiritual discipline is to realise just that. There are different views. All these views are but so many paths to reach the same goal. But everyone believes that his view alone is right, that his watch alone keeps correct time. Knowledge leads to Unity but Ignorance to Diversity (just like those Blind Individuals!) Indeed, if one is able to attain One (Satchidananda), all will be attained.
@@sambalghale7313Krishna said " अविधिपूर्वकम्" worshipping without proper rules. Just like glorifying yogiji, is indirect glorification of modiji, because modi gave him his position. But glorifying yogiji s not complete glorification of modi, it is not the proper rule. Just like that, all other devatas are representative of SriHari. Hari alone is ISWAR TATTVA. All other devatas including Bramma and Indra, and us, is JIVA TATTVA (except Shiva and Mahamaya, they are in between). Hari gave them position, he gave them power to rule the world. The seed of your confusion is MAYAVADA. mayavad says that supreme truth is bramman, and bramman take form of Vishnu, Shiva and durga according to worshipers, and after worshipping the deity form, they will merge with bramman. But the thing is Sri hari is supreme truth, he pervade this world as bramman. Thats why his name is "Vishnu" means "one who pervades". Just like Sun cause sunshine, sunshine doesn't cause Sun. Jivas (including all devatas) are eternal servent of SriHari and there is नित्य भेद( eternal duality) between jiva and bramman (Vishnu). We can't merge with god, even after attaining moksha ( free from rebirth circle) we will serve Krishna in his association.
@@kiteretsu3600Veda vyasa is not lier. He is अंश of narayan himself. But he wrote 18 purana for different peoples. Among them 6 puranas are Satvik, which glorify Vishnu/Krishna as supreme , 6 puranas are rajsik which glorifies Bramma and durga, 6 puranas are tamsik which glorifies Shiva. This division also has a higher cause. Tamsik Puranas for tamsik people, so that they can upgrade and become Rajsik. Rajsik Puranas is there to help people to become satvik, And satvik puranas is full of direct glorification and pastimes of Krishna, for only Satvik people, for Developing love for Krishna and becoming Trigunatith. वैष्णवं नारदीयं च तथा भागवतं शुभम् । गारुडं च तथा पाद्मं वाराहं शुभदर्शने । सात्विकानि पुराणानि विज्ञेयानि शुभानि वै ।। ब्रह्माण्डं ब्रह्मवैवर्तं मार्कण्डेयं तथैव च । भविष्यं वामनं ब्राह्मं राजसानि निबोधत।। मात्सयं कौर्मं तथा लैङ्गम् शैवं स्कान्दं तथैव च । आग्नेयं च षडेतानि तामसानि निबोधत ।। (Padma Purana : Uttarakhanda 236:18-20) Translation : Vishnu Purana, Naradiya Puran, Padma Purana, Garuda Purana, Varaha Purana, Srimad Bhagavata Purana are Satvik . Brahmanda Purana, Brahmavaivarta, Markandeya Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Vamana Purana, Brahma Purana are Rajsika . Matsya Purana, Kurma Purana, Linga Purana, Shiva Purana, Skanda Purana, Agni Purana are Tamasika. This puran classification is there in Padma purana, Garuda purana, Prakasha samhita etc. You can search in Google " classification of puranas in scriptures"
@@chantharekrishna8398 Expected Response! Certain Puranas argue that the Puranas you consider sattvic are, in fact, tamasic. For precise references, I suggest consulting "Ahvaan - Call of Dharma." Regarding the statement "Shiva and Mahamaya fall in between," do you have any personal experiences (or experiences from those corresponding those blind individuals of that tale) that can establish this as absolute truth? Or should it be regarded as mere speculation? Did Krishna ever mention what constitutes "not proper rules" or explicitly state that "Durga and Shiva are my servants" and He grant them powers to rule the world? Remember, "Ekam Sat Vipara Bahuda Vadanti," which states that the Truth is known by different names like Krishna, Durga, Shiva, and so on. Alright! If Ved Vyasa is not a lier, then should we consider renowned Devi Bhaktas and Kashmiri Shiva Bhaktas who proclaimed and experienced the oneness of Devi and Krishna, and Shiva and Devi, as liars and deceivers? They were not mere believers but true seers! Do you perceive their experiences as mere speculation, both from your perspective and that of your community? I believe I know the answer. It is truly disheartening to witness a part within Sanatan Dharma sowing seeds of division and resembling Abrahamism. How does your community define Mayavad? Can you provide certificate of confirmation from all the individuals I mentioned earlier that they are indeed Mayavadis? Additionally, can you obtain confirmation, from the Shankaracharyas, of the labeled scriptures as to their classification as sattvic or tamasic? If you cannot provide such certification, then why should I accept your community's beliefs as authoritative and not mere speculation or sectarianism? Perhaps Brahman serves as the foundation for every desire, realm, manifestation, and physicality, but throughout history, no one has been able to offer a complete definition of Brahman. Can you provide a comprehensive description of Brahman, considering that you have already asserted conclusions about it? I assume you possess experiential and complete knowledge of Brahman. Is Bhagavan distinct from Brahman? Bhagavan is the all-knowing one, but is He also omnipresent at the same moment? Since neither you nor any other scholarly being has been able to fully define yourselves, how can you completely define the Source of Creation (Self)? How can you exclusively ascribe your exaggerated definition of God to the source of creation (Ishwara Tatva)? It appears that you lack experiential background for your all sectarian beliefs and simply label others while nurturing your own sectarianism and theology based solely on confidence, without clarity. Can you explain why your perception of Hinduism ultimately resembles Abrahamism? Moreover, what is the purpose of constructing the concept of "Ishta Devta" in Sanatan Dharma? I have noticed that members of your community, similar to Muslims before Christians, assert statements such as "We respect and love Shiva and Devi more than you do because Shiva is only a Vaishnav, but Krishna, the true God," paralleling the sentiment expressed by Muslims towards Jesus that "we respect and love jesus more than you christians". I ask again, Krishna, as a cowherd boy, once playfully stole maakhan from people's homes; that was his one Leela. However, should we claim that he is now permanently a cowherd boy and a thief? A sectarian individual with an agenda to impose their beliefs on others and convert them to their chosen path cannot truly become a devotee. They will remain mere believers, relying on confidence derived from scripture-endorsed information, lacking experiential understanding and clarity.
This guru has made fun of geeta. Geeta me bhagwan ne arjun ko bola ki koi tattvadarshi hi ise samajha sakta hai jisne khud aatm darshan kar liya ho. Tattvadarshi guru k lakshano me ek lakshan hai ki vo kisi ki ninda nahi karta. Par ye to seedha insult and abuse karta hai dusre path wale bhakto ko. Ye akela hi bhakt kya is world me. Ek andha dusre andhe ko kya rasta dikhayega. Iski videos se prove hota hai ki ye pura pakhandi hai. Geeta ke naam pe mislead kar raha hai.
Please come with authentic quotations. What if I show you evidences of great authorities giving befitting replies to false interpretations, gurus? Please post your views in respectful manner.
What?! What is prabhu ji saying has philosophical basis. And gita says so. Please Come with authentic Question, otherwise don't comment anything without knowing Vaishnva philosophy. Wrong philosophy, which is against Hari Bhakti- against selfless service of lord should be debunked.
Hare Krishna 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hare Krishna prabhuji dandwat pranam 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Hare Krishna Prabhuji
Hare Krishna
Really Krishna's devote are very Very intelligent
Prabhuji bhagwat gita k baad bhagwatam or cc bhi please
Yes prabhu 🙏
Anand bad ajayga , Anand ki nadiya bahegi ❤❤❤
Hare Krishna
Yes Prabhuji please 🙏🏻
Hare Krishna Hari Hari bol
Aapke shre charno me dandwat praname prabhu ji
this series is a binge watch....what an amazing series....Hari Bol.....thank you so much KC talks for taking this up and letting us know the Bhagwad Gita from HG Keshavanand Prabhuji ....aapko dandwat pranaam
Really Wonderful Wonderfull Harekrishna 🌹🌹💐💐 🥳🥳🥰🥰🥰🥰🙏🙏🙏 Keshav Anand Swami Rocks✌️🥰
Hare Krishna prabhuji dandwat pranam 🙏🌺🌹❣️🌻🌸🏵️💕🌷🎈🌼✨🌿🌺💐💮🌹❤️🎉
Hare Krishna
Dandvat pranam prabhu ji
All videos are awesome
Param pavitra shri guru maharaj key charno main dandwat parnam
Wow
Hare Krishna Prabhu Ji 📿🙇❤️
Hare Krishna prabhu ji Sadar prnaam ji 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
KCTalks r very intelligent, prabhuji reveals whole theme of the chapter while asking questions,jaya
🙏
waiting waiting waiting for next,my favourite chapters 7th nd 10th🎉🎉❤
I am waiting for this..now waiting for next chapter.. thanks a lot Prabhu ji
Pranam 🙏hare Krishna 🙏🙏
We are waiting for for next episodes 😢
Part 10 please
Bhagavad gita K bad Bhagvatam or CC bhi chahiye please prabhu ji ❤❤ 🎉🎉
Hare Krishna there is chapter10? And more
Prabhuji main sochti thi ki yey kisi team leadet key liye hain
Ye anubhavi nahi hai pls samjho. Ye sirf theoretical refrences deta rehta hai. Kabhi is kitab se kabhi dusri kitab se. Apne ander us parmatma ko dekho bhaio. Mera aap logo se koi shikwa nahi hai. Par aap log apne ander ki gehrai me utarna hi nahi chahte. Is pakhandi ye tak keha diya ki dhyan se koi parmatma tak nahi pahuch sakta. Agar aisa hi hota to krishna na dhyan vidhi kyu batayi. Maharshi patanjali ne kyu batayi. Ye apne aap ko itna samajhta hai kya. Ye hai kya jo itne badw mahatmaho ki baato ko fail kar raha hai. Pakhandi hai ye fir sun lo. Bar bar kahunha.
23:59 Krishna never explicitly claimed that Shiva, Durga, Kali, Ganesh, etc., are the devas (your labeled demigods) I'm referring to in this verse or they fall in the category of devas. What is That Avidhipurvakam? He didn't explicitly mentioned that as well in BG; it is inadequate to claim that all other methods of worship is explicitly Trutipurn. Who said that their abodes' individuals are subject to birth and death? Maa Durga, Maa Kali, Lord Shiva themselves proclaim in their scriptures that they are the bestowers of liberation (mukti dayak) and auspiciousness (mangal dayak). Where did Krishna asked everybody to treat them (shiva, durga, kali) as his servants Alone? Sectarianism and fanaticism have made you people Blind. According to your sectarian political claims, Ved Vyas perhaps has been proven a liar, a deluder, who wrote Devi Bhagwatam and Shiv Mahapuran, as well as all those great devotees who saw Devi Maa face to face, talked to her just like you and me personally, still proclaimed that He who is Krishna is the same Kali, the same Shiva, and the same Rama with infinite names, the same One Satchidananda. Clear my doubts by declaring those devotees (or whatever you may label them) as deluders or mentally unstable or any label you wish. I will bow down to you and move away quietly.
I have mentioned this Tale thousands of times, but this time, I will explain the complete narrative. Read with open eyes and an open mind -
Once upon a time, there were four blind individuals who had never encountered an elephant before. They were curious to understand what an elephant was like. Through divine intervention, the blind men were granted a once in a lifetime opportunity to feel the elephant for few moments. When they reached the elephant, they began exploring it by touching it with their hands.
The first blind person touched the elephant's leg and exclaimed, "An elephant is like a sturdy pillar!"
The second blind person touched the elephant's tail and said, "No, no! An elephant is like a rope, thin and flexible!"
The third blind person touched the elephant's trunk and insisted, "You are both mistaken. An elephant is like a long tube or a snake!"
The fourth blind person touched the elephant's side and declared, "You are all wrong. An elephant is like a giant wall!"
Each blind person had a different perception based on the part of the elephant they touched, and they strongly believed their own interpretation to be the Sole Truth. They started arguing, each defending their own understanding and dismissing others' perspectives.
Upon witnessing this, someone (perhaps a paramhansa) who could see approached them and explained, "All of you are partially correct. The elephant is a combination of all these aspects - the legs, the tail, the trunk, and the side. None of you has the complete picture unless you consider all the parts together."
If it seems logical to you, you may contemplate this Tale or reject it as a Tamasic Tale.
If their worship alone, whom you consider demigods, will not lead me to moksha, alright, I'm perfectly fine with no liberation. But I will not change my Ishta for mere benefits. Whatever my Ishta may give me or may not, I will accept that as a blessing, as my fate, even if that is Rasatal. Still, I will pray that he alone may remain my Ishta for eternity, wherever and whenever I may take birth. Because I have accepted him alone as my Ishta (after much testing!) and I know that he is one with all other forms and names of Satchidananda. He who is described in the Vedas is also described in the Tantras and the Puranas. All of them speak about the one Satchidananda. The Nitya and the Lila are the two aspects of the one Reality. It is described in the Vedas as 'Om Satchidananda Brahman,' in the Tantras as 'Om Satchidananda Siva,' the ever-pure Siva, and in the Puranas as 'Om Satchidananda Krishna.' That which is Brahman is also Kali, the Adyasakti, who creates, preserves, and destroys the universe. He who is Krishna is the same as Kali. The root is one - all these are His sport and play. All the scriptures, the Vedas, the Puranas, and the Tantras, speak only of one Satchidananda. According to Devi Purana, Kāli Herself has become Krishna. But what difference does it make? God is infinite, and infinite are the ways to reach Him. But if he's offended by my faith, if it seems Adharma in his eyes, then may he erase my existence completely as nothing is impossible for your Godhead Krishna!
The word "avidhipurvakam" is clearly mentioned in the sloka. lord krishna
Bg. 7.7
मत्त: परतरं नान्यत्किञ्चिदस्ति धनञ्जय ।
मयि सर्वमिदं प्रोतं सूत्रे मणिगणा इव ॥ ७ ॥
O conqueror of wealth, there is no truth superior to Me. Everything rests upon Me, as pearls are strung on a thread.
Īśo 15
hiraṇmayena pātreṇa
satyasyāpihitaṁ mukham
tat tvaṁ pūṣann apāvṛṇu
satya-dharmāya dṛṣṭaye
O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee.
Bg. 5.29
भोक्तारं यज्ञतपसां सर्वलोकमहेश्वरम् ।
सुहृदं सर्वभूतानां ज्ञात्वा मां शान्तिमृच्छति ॥ २९ ॥
A person in full consciousness of Me, knowing Me to be the ultimate beneficiary of all sacrifices and austerities, the Supreme Lord of all planets and demigods, and the benefactor and well-wisher of all living entities, attains peace from the pangs of material miseries.
Bg. 14.27
ब्रह्मणो हि प्रतिष्ठाहममृतस्याव्ययस्य च ।
शाश्वतस्य च धर्मस्य सुखस्यैकान्तिकस्य च ॥ २७ ॥
And I am the basis of the impersonal Brahman, which is immortal, imperishable and eternal and is the constitutional position of ultimate happiness.
@@sambalghale7313 I simply asked what exact Vidhi is being considered Avidhi. Krishna didn't mention that; it is now you people who are considering all other methods, except yours, as Avidhi. The rest is your sectarianism and the attitude of those blind individuals. Pranam.
Here are a few insights that should be contemplated upon only by spiritual seekers, not believers, not textbook reader fanatics!
• All troubles come to an end when the ego dies. The truth is that you cannot attain God if you have even a trace of desire. It matters less, what a man worships than in what spirit he worships. Seeing God leads automatically to a recognition of His oneness. Infinity cannot be multiplied. There cannot be more than one Infinite Being. Deity with form and formless, personal and impersonal, manifested and unmanifested - all must be contained in that Being.
• Sunlight is one and the same wherever it falls, but only bright surfaces like clear water, mirrors, and polished metals can reflect it fully. So is the Light Divine. It falls equally and impartially on all hearts, but only the pure and clean hearts of the good and holy ones can fully reflect it (Sectarians and People with Agendas won't!)
• The fabled musk deer searches the world over for the source of the scent that comes from itself. Bhakti is the one essential thing. To be sure, God exists in all beings. Who, then is a devotee? He whose mind dwells on God. But this is not possible as long as one has egotism and vanity. The water of God's grace cannot collect on the high mound of egotism. It runs down.
• God is not only inside us; he is both inside and outside. Everything is chaitanya, Consciousness. The aim of spiritual discipline is to realise just that. There are different views. All these views are but so many paths to reach the same goal. But everyone believes that his view alone is right, that his watch alone keeps correct time. Knowledge leads to Unity but Ignorance to Diversity (just like those Blind Individuals!)
Indeed, if one is able to attain One (Satchidananda), all will be attained.
@@sambalghale7313Krishna said " अविधिपूर्वकम्" worshipping without proper rules. Just like glorifying yogiji, is indirect glorification of modiji, because modi gave him his position. But glorifying yogiji s not complete glorification of modi, it is not the proper rule.
Just like that, all other devatas are representative of SriHari. Hari alone is ISWAR TATTVA. All other devatas including Bramma and Indra, and us, is JIVA TATTVA (except Shiva and Mahamaya, they are in between). Hari gave them position, he gave them power to rule the world.
The seed of your confusion is MAYAVADA. mayavad says that supreme truth is bramman, and bramman take form of Vishnu, Shiva and durga according to worshipers, and after worshipping the deity form, they will merge with bramman.
But the thing is Sri hari is supreme truth, he pervade this world as bramman. Thats why his name is "Vishnu" means "one who pervades". Just like Sun cause sunshine, sunshine doesn't cause Sun. Jivas (including all devatas) are eternal servent of SriHari and there is नित्य भेद( eternal duality) between jiva and bramman (Vishnu). We can't merge with god, even after attaining moksha ( free from rebirth circle) we will serve Krishna in his association.
@@kiteretsu3600Veda vyasa is not lier. He is अंश of narayan himself. But he wrote 18 purana for different peoples. Among them 6 puranas are Satvik, which glorify Vishnu/Krishna as supreme , 6 puranas are rajsik which glorifies Bramma and durga, 6 puranas are tamsik which glorifies Shiva. This division also has a higher cause. Tamsik Puranas for tamsik people, so that they can upgrade and become Rajsik. Rajsik Puranas is there to help people to become satvik, And satvik puranas is full of direct glorification and pastimes of Krishna, for only Satvik people, for Developing love for Krishna and becoming Trigunatith.
वैष्णवं नारदीयं च तथा भागवतं शुभम् ।
गारुडं च तथा पाद्मं वाराहं शुभदर्शने ।
सात्विकानि पुराणानि विज्ञेयानि शुभानि वै ।।
ब्रह्माण्डं ब्रह्मवैवर्तं मार्कण्डेयं तथैव च ।
भविष्यं वामनं ब्राह्मं राजसानि निबोधत।।
मात्सयं कौर्मं तथा लैङ्गम् शैवं स्कान्दं तथैव च ।
आग्नेयं च षडेतानि तामसानि निबोधत ।।
(Padma Purana : Uttarakhanda 236:18-20)
Translation : Vishnu Purana, Naradiya Puran, Padma Purana, Garuda Purana, Varaha Purana, Srimad Bhagavata Purana are Satvik .
Brahmanda Purana, Brahmavaivarta, Markandeya Purana, Bhavishya Purana, Vamana Purana, Brahma Purana are Rajsika .
Matsya Purana, Kurma Purana, Linga Purana, Shiva Purana, Skanda Purana, Agni Purana are Tamasika.
This puran classification is there in Padma purana, Garuda purana, Prakasha samhita etc. You can search in Google " classification of puranas in scriptures"
@@chantharekrishna8398 Expected Response! Certain Puranas argue that the Puranas you consider sattvic are, in fact, tamasic. For precise references, I suggest consulting "Ahvaan - Call of Dharma." Regarding the statement "Shiva and Mahamaya fall in between," do you have any personal experiences (or experiences from those corresponding those blind individuals of that tale) that can establish this as absolute truth? Or should it be regarded as mere speculation? Did Krishna ever mention what constitutes "not proper rules" or explicitly state that "Durga and Shiva are my servants" and He grant them powers to rule the world? Remember, "Ekam Sat Vipara Bahuda Vadanti," which states that the Truth is known by different names like Krishna, Durga, Shiva, and so on.
Alright! If Ved Vyasa is not a lier, then should we consider renowned Devi Bhaktas and Kashmiri Shiva Bhaktas who proclaimed and experienced the oneness of Devi and Krishna, and Shiva and Devi, as liars and deceivers? They were not mere believers but true seers! Do you perceive their experiences as mere speculation, both from your perspective and that of your community? I believe I know the answer. It is truly disheartening to witness a part within Sanatan Dharma sowing seeds of division and resembling Abrahamism.
How does your community define Mayavad? Can you provide certificate of confirmation from all the individuals I mentioned earlier that they are indeed Mayavadis? Additionally, can you obtain confirmation, from the Shankaracharyas, of the labeled scriptures as to their classification as sattvic or tamasic? If you cannot provide such certification, then why should I accept your community's beliefs as authoritative and not mere speculation or sectarianism? Perhaps Brahman serves as the foundation for every desire, realm, manifestation, and physicality, but throughout history, no one has been able to offer a complete definition of Brahman. Can you provide a comprehensive description of Brahman, considering that you have already asserted conclusions about it? I assume you possess experiential and complete knowledge of Brahman. Is Bhagavan distinct from Brahman? Bhagavan is the all-knowing one, but is He also omnipresent at the same moment? Since neither you nor any other scholarly being has been able to fully define yourselves, how can you completely define the Source of Creation (Self)? How can you exclusively ascribe your exaggerated definition of God to the source of creation (Ishwara Tatva)? It appears that you lack experiential background for your all sectarian beliefs and simply label others while nurturing your own sectarianism and theology based solely on confidence, without clarity. Can you explain why your perception of Hinduism ultimately resembles Abrahamism? Moreover, what is the purpose of constructing the concept of "Ishta Devta" in Sanatan Dharma? I have noticed that members of your community, similar to Muslims before Christians, assert statements such as "We respect and love Shiva and Devi more than you do because Shiva is only a Vaishnav, but Krishna, the true God," paralleling the sentiment expressed by Muslims towards Jesus that "we respect and love jesus more than you christians". I ask again, Krishna, as a cowherd boy, once playfully stole maakhan from people's homes; that was his one Leela. However, should we claim that he is now permanently a cowherd boy and a thief?
A sectarian individual with an agenda to impose their beliefs on others and convert them to their chosen path cannot truly become a devotee. They will remain mere believers, relying on confidence derived from scripture-endorsed information, lacking experiential understanding and clarity.
This guru has made fun of geeta. Geeta me bhagwan ne arjun ko bola ki koi tattvadarshi hi ise samajha sakta hai jisne khud aatm darshan kar liya ho. Tattvadarshi guru k lakshano me ek lakshan hai ki vo kisi ki ninda nahi karta. Par ye to seedha insult and abuse karta hai dusre path wale bhakto ko. Ye akela hi bhakt kya is world me. Ek andha dusre andhe ko kya rasta dikhayega. Iski videos se prove hota hai ki ye pura pakhandi hai. Geeta ke naam pe mislead kar raha hai.
Please come with authentic quotations. What if I show you evidences of great authorities giving befitting replies to false interpretations, gurus?
Please post your views in respectful manner.
What?! What is prabhu ji saying has philosophical basis. And gita says so. Please Come with authentic Question, otherwise don't comment anything without knowing Vaishnva philosophy.
Wrong philosophy, which is against Hari Bhakti- against selfless service of lord should be debunked.
Hare Krishna
Hare Krishna Prabhu ji 🙏
Hare krsna 🙏🙏🙏