Infrastructure as Code Explained

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @andypokladowski3562
    @andypokladowski3562 2 года назад +1

    Bravo ! Best most concise explanation of IaaC on youtube ! Unless there is another one that I haven’t come across after searching and watching 10 other times….😊

  • @ckennington1
    @ckennington1 3 года назад +6

    Great video! I am definitely interested in hearing about how to integrate terraform with Ansible to create a full deployment pipeline.

  • @diamondparteyh
    @diamondparteyh 2 года назад +2

    Yay, I understood the concept because of you! Thanks :)

  • @YeetPC
    @YeetPC 3 года назад +2

    Great video! A video about configuration management concepts and tools like Ansible would be nice. Keep up the great content!

  • @donaldkennedy7993
    @donaldkennedy7993 2 года назад

    great intro to IaC ;)

  • @harrytrueman4216
    @harrytrueman4216 3 года назад

    Does Inf as code work well for windows domain environments or better for linux environments?

    • @ProTechShow
      @ProTechShow  3 года назад +1

      The provisioning side of things I've showed here doesn't really care because at this stage it's not really Windows or Linux yet. It's more the underlying cloud or virtualisation platform that matters.
      When it comes to the configuration management side both work, but Linux is better supported. Most of the tools began on Linux and added Windows support later. The big difference is that most Linux configuration is based around editing a text file, which is really easy to automate and all you need to scale it is SSH. Windows is more complicated and has a load of different interfaces and APIs to deal with. If something exists in Linux it can almost certainly be automated. If something exists in Windows it can probably be automated... as long as Microsoft have exposed it in some way these tools can hook into it using something like WinRM or PowerShell.

    • @chrishoedt
      @chrishoedt 3 года назад

      Should/must work for both