Israel didn't target a safe zone in Rafah. So what happened?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 сен 2024
- Almost eight months into the Israel-Hamas war, and the media has learned nothing in regard to blindly reporting Hamas’ propaganda. Although the investigation of the cause of the fire in Rafah is still underway, here are the details we do know.
Sadly, this convincing version of events will not be reported on The BBC.
Or ANY traditional media outlets in the US… it’s shameful.
Thank you for your factual explanation - Standing strong with Israel !
Too bad this video isnt getting views. Nobody cares about the truth
The facts should matter!
Don't you know that only feelings matter nowadays?
Very clear explanation, thank you
The truth will win, ty
Truth my a$$ , y'all are so desperate it's crazyyyyyy , they bombed designated safe areas a thousand times, it's just that this time the horrifying images pushed them to come up with a justification so here we go again with the gaslighting, like man
I am so shocked by the biased media covering of the war, against Israel. I stand with Jewish people. ❤ from the Netherlands
How do secondary explosions start so far away?
We will see when they have investigated. Better wait and see. Remember Al shifa hospital and how that was initially blamed on an Israeli air strike but after investigation it was shown to be a misfired Islamic jihad rocket.
Maybe if it wasn't actually that far away? She says the target was 1.7 km away, but the graphic shows the strike at 180 meters away. If they could be so far off target, then what is to say it was actually only 180 meters? Another 180 meters is only 10% more off-target.
@@haydencapps Scroll down for an explanation written an hour before you asked.
@@haydencappsWhere did she say the target is 1.7km away
0:22 actually watch the video
To Fessi Drott. In israel there is a consensus not to return to Gaza. There is indeed an illusory minority that is interested and unfortunately Netanyahu added it to the government, but they don't decide and I assure you that israel will not return to settle in Gaza. I wish Egypt would agree to rule Gaza. Most of israelis would be happy if Gaza would came under Egyptian control.
I love HonestReporting, its a shame your posts don't get shared more, the Daily Mail in UK and the Sun are better than the broadsheets on this. I guess that is why the tabloid journalists always beat the Broadsheets at University Challenge . People dismiss those papers as low brow, but honestly they do their due diligigience reach a wider audience and simplify the argument, Guardian is a rag in my opinion, the journalists believe, with out investigating never roll up their sleeves and research, rely on hearsay and promote populism. Israel is always going to be the loser against a majority of Muslim countries and Christian countries votes in UN, or on social media, its called beating up the minority, picking on the one Jewish country, or the one Jewish child in the classroom. If Guardian/BBC were worth their salt, Reuters, Washington Post, they would be representing the tiny voice, the minority, the one drowned out by the mob.
17 kilo bomb , 37 lb ...
"the majority killed were women and children"- Now, this is per automato basic statistics. HALF of Gazas people are minors. And we may presume the rest of civiilians is about 25-25. What gives. In a random explosion in a tightly inhabited area, 75 % casualties WILL be women and children... If the numbers are less than 75%, ie the number of killed men is more than 25% - we KNOW the excess are for sure Hamas. More, because we know some teenage boys, whom counts as children - but some of them are Hamas... We all had seen teenage boys in Gaza training weaponry and guerilla tactics, no? Also, we may suspect some other civilian:, women, men, teenagers of all both genders - are weapon carriers and couriers... It was so in occupied Europe during ww2, its surely so in Gaza too... Re casualties: We may suspect, there is a higher percentage of men - read Hamas - among the killed. While the percentage of civilians will be relatively higher among the wounded. How come?? Israeli seldom bomb completely random just to kill some palestinians. Usually they bomb known, or at least suspected; Hamas positions.. And thus; a very big share of the dead are Hamas because they are in the self centrum of the bombing, while civilians farther away fo the centrum for the explosion - will be mostly civilians, and so, not so many dead but many wounded...
The fact matter, show your sources… dont just expect us to believe you without sources… specially if you claim the WHOLE media is wrong and you are right.
Otherwise what you are doing is just propaganda.
There's no, and will never be, nor has been honest reporting from the BBC .
Thanks for your report! Stand with Israël, free the world from hamas!
Israel is the worlds biggest terror state. Free the world from Israel and its lies. They said the exact same thing about al shifa hospital with an intercepted phone call, there was nothing there. They are attacking civilians on purpose
1. Why would they set up a refugee camp a mile out from the designated safe zone?
2. They targeted a structure ‘1 mile away from the humanitarian area’ but then the IDF strike is 180m away from the camps? What does humanitarian area mean here?
Answers will be appreciated thank you
@Ikreisrond Thank you for your informative reply 👍. I am confused because the safezone looked like only fields with no camps. So do the location of safezones change quickly?
a humanitarian area according to HAMAS terrorists means a weapon depot, and a mass casualty event, for optics. They do call their children and women, collateral damage, just like the IRA bomber who claims to have killed mountbatten did in press recently, when he called the Irish and British child killed 'collateral damage' terrorists are evil, anyone supporting that logic needs therapy and rehabilitation.
Everyone should remember October 7, when Devils woke up God
Lol God was asleep?😂😂😂
Thank you for the truth
I'm missing your own sources.
Why the lies??? Even Netanyahu admitted it was a tragic mistake admitting to the attack.
He actually use the word - mishap
It's your side lying and warping his words.
@@BenyKarachun actual it was from Zionist propaganda not my side and I dont know why you associate me to a side?
Why delete my comments? Why hide the truth? Can't hack that the world has opened its eyes to Israel's aggression?
He said it's a "tragic incident", but was misquoted as "tragic accident".
Accurate, honest reporting does matter. In that spirit, please take more care yourselves. The UN figure was not updated because of Hamas Health Ministry inaccuracies, they changed TO the Health Ministry figures. They were previously using Hamas Media Office figures. From the BBC on May 17th:
'The UN also says it is now relying on figures from the Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza, rather than from the Hamas-run Government Media Office (GMO).'
Wait can someone help me out here?
I thought isrsel already said it was a mistake and admitted to it ?
At this point every news is so drastically different idk what to believe 😂
First thing Israel as said it was a sad tragedy and a mistake, than the facts comes out from the idf spokesperson, it still a tragic mistake because it was not intentional, but the facts as she stated are true
They said it's a "tragic incident", but it was misquoted in the west apparently as "tragic accident".
Never let the facts get in the way of hatred of the Jews - as demonstrated by many of these comments
Fessi Drott. Now about your claim of genocide. You cheapen the concept of genocide. There is precise definition of what genocide is. You can argue that israel response is disproportionate. Maybe. I don't think so but maybe. It is very easy to look from the side when was no country that faced such a situation. Since it's establishment, israel has been in existential danger. In the 1948 war it was a miracle that israel succeeded against five armies from Arabs countries. Before the 1967 war the people on the home front in israel were depressed and were sure that the state of Israel would not survive. I was 7 years old at the time and I remember the radio in Hebrew from Cairo that described what the Arabs would do to the residents of Israel, the radio station from Cairo was called the voice of Thunder. In practice the war lasted 6 days and the situation changed at once from depressions to Euphoria. After the six day war, the extreme national religious that is minority in israel began to settle in occupied territory. In 1992, the majority of the people in israel supported the 2- state solution and Yitzhak Rabin came to power, right after that in 1993 Hamas started suicide attacks inside israel. The attacks in israel led to Rabin assassination and Netanyahu rise to power in 1996.
So was the strike a little over a mile away, or was it 180 meters away? The graphic you show is not consistent with what you said at the start. Or was it that the target was 1.7 km away but they actually struck only 180 meters away? If that is the case, how could they be so far off with these small and targetted attacks?
I'm finding it impossible to understand this event because literally no one is giving an account which makes sense
They are explaining the actions israel took and what happened at the refugee site. Yes. It doesn’t make sense because all the facts have not been discovered. All they have proved in this video was that Israel did not strike the camp but a different target. This video was sensible in arguing that this is what we know. The rest is still under investigation. We will need to wait till we find out the other facts. But it shows how quick we are to jump to conclusions simply because the media has reported it that way because they have taken Hamas’ word for it.
The 180 meters is the distance the strike was from shelters. The actual safe zone was over a mile.
In that graphic they are saying the ‘designated safe zone’ is 1.7km away. The camp isn’t within the ‘designated safe zone’
Can you show a zoomed out graphic to verify that you have the correct marking of the safe zone?
Great reliable and accurate report. Well done 👏🏻
Oct.7
May 15 1948
@@marilynshepherd6480 Oct 7th
@@Bob-bb3urdo your history.This did not all start from October 7.it all started back when Israel was established in 1948 as you have already been told 2x now
@@shaunwhelan5091 You do your own history: It did not start in 1948, in 1936-39 and not even in 1921 or in 1834. Arabs were massacring Jews periodically from time immemorial. In 1909, however, the Jews have started defending themselves with the establishment of "Hashomer" so in 1921 there were more Arabs dead than Jews and this marked a turning point which continued throughout the "Arab revolt" of 1936-1939. This time, the Arabs had a lot more casualties.. In 1947, the Arabs started massacring again, only this time, the Jews were ready. Enter 1948.. The losing Arabs cry out for all the Arab states around to intervene. Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria and Iraq answer the call and invade, plus the local Mufti's Jihad army and the ALA this makes 7 armies. And they all got their asses handed over to them. Many Arabs chose the right side of history and stayed to become Israeli citizens while most of them chose to run away with the fleeing remnants of the Arab armies. And this is what happened in 1948. What does international law really say about this? Right, that when you attack someone and lose, he does not need to give you back your land or even allow you to return. The "right of return" as it is called by mistake as based on UN 194 does not say "Palestinian" or even "Arab" refugees, instead, it relates to ALL refugees which explains why the Arabs had opposed it: The Jewish refugees they had expelled with one suitcase had far more properties in their lands of origin and they stole these properties. So this is why UN194 has no valid legal standing - because by the UN charter a decision must be accepted by all sides to it at the day of signature to become legally binding, so UN194 is not legally binding. And also UN181 since the Arabs did not accept it (and still do not accept it, to this day).
@@shaunwhelan5091 do real history, and you'll see it started a long time before that, but even if it didn't your take on what actually happened in 1948 is probably completely biased against the facts.
First attacked? 2nd laughed? 3rd showed crying faces online? The 4th shouted on the streets to demand other people to sympathize with evil?
Learn, hate begets disaster.
Come to study the KJV Holy Bible.
Love and obey the Lord Jesus Christ, for salvation.,..,,..,
You're using misinformation on the bomb. It's referred to as a 250lb bomb. The GBU-39 is a 250lb bomb.
No, it's referred to a small missile launched from a drone, called "Mikholit".
@@BenyKarachun Dude you're arguing with the US airforce not me. It's a 250lb bomb that was dropped on tents.
@@samanthakellerman6867 No, I'm not arguing with the US air force, nor you, that was not used.
According to the NYT, US officials urged Israel to use SDBs in Rafah.
It doesn't mean it was used in that particular attack. IDF said it 2 used 17kg missiles. Those are Israeli drone launched missiles
@@samanthakellerman6867 What happened was the idiots in CNN "analyzed" the scene and "concluded GBU-39s were used" and then called some retired Air Force Special Operations Master Sergeant that assumed that was true. He is not a spokesman of the US air force by any means.
Such reports are done by idiots in order to fool the common people.
@@BenyKarachun Yeah, the IDF is lying. CNN confirmed that the bomb is a GBU-39 that the airforce calls a 250lb bomb. NYT lost its integrity when it published it's now debunked r* and no head baby story.
You don't believe yourself what you are saying.
😂😂 Bags of money flying through the air 🤣🤣🤣
You do realise how fake this looks?
What a load of crab
Bs
Ah the IDF propaganda channel calling themselves honest hahahah
all facts though.
And I suppose Hamas should be taken at their word. I began to heavily scrutinize their media after early on in the war the Hamas claimed 500 people had died in an explosion that happened in a parking lot and was likely shot from Hamas themselves.
I wont pretend the IDF has always been perfectly truthful, for example the 'command center' under the Shifa hospital was very heavily exaguratted, but at least they dont lie as blatantly.
This event im not sure about, it will take time for investigation to unfold, but im not some dumbass who will immediately jump to conclusions from a terrorist organizations word.
Ah the random commentor on a RUclips video dismissing everything in a video that they disagree with as "idf propoganda" instead of actually dealing with the information
@@TheLoyalpain IDF is proven to be delivering fake news and propaganda together with their zionist minions
Removing comments good job !
Jewish reporting.
Onter think. If you palestinian then you are also have jewish root, because the Palestinian are mixed of Arabs with jews. Than if you hate jews actually you hate yourself.
@Ikreisrond
Since the middle ages, Jews have only ever looked after Jew interests. They by nature care not for their fellow man,but themselves only,they are but the chosen ones and skew their way of thinking to report that this is the only way and if you disagree your anti semite.
They can't help but lie its in there dna
Lying is allowed in Islam.
Wow, racist much?
@@stephenwood6663how on earth is that racist? Clearly the truth has hit its mark
@@stephenwood6663No. It’s 100% fact.
@@martynanstis1620 If you *really* want to go ahead and claim that lying is in a people's dna, Israel has, in recent months, lied about:
1) 40 beheaded babies
2) Not using white phosophorus on October 10th and October 11th
3) Claims of r*pe on October 7th (they later admitted that the state “does not yet have any evidence of r*pe having occurred during Saturday’s attack or its aftermath”)
4) Not launching airstrikes on civilian convoys on routes which they designated "safe".
5) burning babies alive in ovens
...the list goes on, and it's longer than I really care to copy out, but you get the idea.
Exactly!