Notice that even the old Leopard 1A5 doesn’t jump up and down like crazy when firing unlike the T-72. And it can quickly go backwards after firing, unlike Soviet tanks.
Your comment aged like a fine milk, we haven't seen leopard 1 yet, but we did see destruction of dozen German leopard 2 tanks, even t55 is better than this trash
@@georgefenrirbitadze4757 Did you get your quota from your russian troll Factory? Who is „we“? Other delusional idiots like you?Where did you see „dozens“ of destroyed Leos? On your russian state tv - when they are filming 2 Leopards from 300 angles 🤣😂 lmfao!
@@clonetrooper71My good sir, I can clearly see that the gun is definitely stabilized in the video, only the early versions of the Leopard 1 is not stabilized. Speaking of the gun, sure. But how about the type ammunition being used?
@Vince I haven't heard it. I only heard that Rheinmetall chief executive Armin Papperger said that 50-60 pieces could be delivered, but the German gov didn't agree. But if it's true what you said, I'm happy!
"The armaments group Rheinmetall apparently wants to deliver 88 Leopard tanks to Ukraine. According to "Welt", a corresponding application was received by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. A ministry spokeswoman told the newspaper that they did not want to comment "for reasons of confidentiality". The Federal Security Council, which heads the Chancellery, must now decide on the application." (Source: Focus Online/Google Translator)
@@FriteusenTerminator I don't think itt will ever happen. And now there is another problem: there's no 105 mm ammunition for these old tanks. Problems after problems...
They will be absolutely great for Ukraine, in even have some advantages over more modern western MBT's, but they need to be used right to their straingths.
The 1A5 is better than 90% of the Russian tanks at least. It does obviously have its limits, but if Ukraine learns to use it right, it will be an absolutely crazy good asset for Ukraine. They need to use it as a sniper as we have seen Ukraine do with its own tanks, waiting in positions while camouflaged. Waiting for the right time to strike, take a few shots, and then use its ability to move backward to get out of there. Its backward speed is many times faster than any Ukrainian or Russian tank. They need to use it for ambushes, it is fast and light so it can get in advantageous positions super fast. They need to use them for flanking attacks, where their speed again is an advantage as so is their low weight. They have super good gun stabilization and con hit moving targets while driving at max speed. Or they can use them as force multipliers supporting heavier western tanks or USSR-style tanks from the back. Should they get in trouble then they can get out of there fast. I don't get why people don't see this is a super good choice to send to Ukraine.
@@andrelunkes1038 i personaly belive the arms industry of Brazil is a sleeping giant...i like the Osorio tank your country made and the A 29 Super Tucano which goes from a desing from one of your planes :D
The Danish Leopard 1a5 are the only 1a5s with the welded turrets. The only thing they really did was change fcs and some other stuff inside hence why they still look like 1a4s The 1a5 upgrade package can be applied to any older leopards its just that the germans wanted to modernise their older leopard 1s with the cast turrets and by the time these modifications were done the Leopard 2a4s had already entered service so the bundeswehr saw no reason to continue the upgrades really
The 1a5 is just an internal upgrade package that can be given to any leopard 1s its just that the germans when they upgraded their leopard 1s chose their older ones and by the time it started being introduced the leopard 2s had already entered service and pretty much replaced the 1 in the mbt role. Hence why the bundeswehr gave leo 1s to recon units and also started selling a shitton to other nations and storing some
Wenn man ihn in der Ukraine zum Einsatz bringen möchte, denn wird er noch einmal gründlich als A6 Variante überarbeitet werden müssen, wenn er es gegen russische Panzer neuster Bauart wie den T14, überstehen können soll. Aber davon werden die Russen auch noch nicht so viel haben, aber auch ein T90, würde der A5 Variante wahrscheinlich schon überlegen sein. Also ohne entsprechende Modifikation, wird der Leo 1 bei den heutigen Kriegsanforderungen in der Ukraine, nicht bestehen können und wahrscheinlich komplett geschrottet werden.
@@ImperialDiecast Gegen diese Panzer mag die Einschätzung zutreffend sein, nur dass man sich nicht aussuchen kann, was einem auf dem Schlachtfeld begegnen wird. Gegen einen T90 hingegen, bezweifele ich dass diese Einschätzung richtig sein wird und davon produzieren die Russen bestimmt eine Menge nach.
Panzer gegen Panzer ist schon ein relativ unwahrscheinliches Szenario. So war das wohl damals aber heute? Übrigens, den T-14 wird Russland eher nicht einsetzen aus Angst vor Verlusten. Kostet zu viel Geld und kann evtl. nicht ersetzt werden. Aus demselben Grund sieht man auch von der russischen Luftwaffe so gut wie gar nichts.
Finally the Leo 1 is about to be allowed to do the thing he was invented for - destroying Russian invaders!
But I had never imagined that it will be Ukrainians who are operating them.
Yes, have made some popcorn to see the fireworks. It's so underestimated a weapon, sure it will do great for Ukraine!
Kkkk inbecis os EUA quem são culpados pela guerra na Ucrânia
@@victorbraga7607 don’t speak Klingon
And how's that working out for You ? Russia is turnning them into scrap
Notice that even the old Leopard 1A5 doesn’t jump up and down like crazy when firing unlike the T-72. And it can quickly go backwards after firing, unlike Soviet tanks.
Your comment aged like a fine milk, we haven't seen leopard 1 yet, but we did see destruction of dozen German leopard 2 tanks, even t55 is better than this trash
@@georgefenrirbitadze4757 Did you get your quota from your russian troll Factory? Who is „we“? Other delusional idiots like you?Where did you see „dozens“ of destroyed Leos? On your russian state tv - when they are filming 2 Leopards from 300 angles 🤣😂 lmfao!
Yeah...T-72's gun is much more powerful and it has an autoloader, and a stabilizer.
@@clonetrooper71My good sir, I can clearly see that the gun is definitely stabilized in the video, only the early versions of the Leopard 1 is not stabilized.
Speaking of the gun, sure. But how about the type ammunition being used?
@@georgefenrirbitadze4757 You are a moron.
Soon in Ukraine, unbelivable....
Unfortunately no. The German government said no, they won't allow to anybody to send Leopard 1 to Ukraine.
@Vince I haven't heard it. I only heard that Rheinmetall chief executive Armin Papperger said that 50-60 pieces could be delivered, but the German gov didn't agree. But if it's true what you said, I'm happy!
"The armaments group Rheinmetall apparently wants to deliver 88 Leopard tanks to Ukraine. According to "Welt", a corresponding application was received by the Ministry of Economic Affairs. A ministry spokeswoman told the newspaper that they did not want to comment "for reasons of confidentiality". The Federal Security Council, which heads the Chancellery, must now decide on the application." (Source: Focus Online/Google Translator)
Now we will definetly See them in a few weeks in Ukraine
@@FriteusenTerminator I don't think itt will ever happen. And now there is another problem: there's no 105 mm ammunition for these old tanks. Problems after problems...
Enemy’s probably got uptierd
Надеемся скоро в Украине.
У немцев все всегда очень качественное. Я без ума от дизайна всего немецкого, особенно оружия, и старого и нового.
Полагаю они модернизированы и оснащены современным БК. Вслед за ними по договору leopard 2 A5 - A6
@@BinyaminLeman Yes they have (EMES-18), thermal sight and laser rangefinder, similar to the leopard 2.
They will be absolutely great for Ukraine, in even have some advantages over more modern western MBT's, but they need to be used right to their straingths.
The 1A5 is better than 90% of the Russian tanks at least.
It does obviously have its limits, but if Ukraine learns to use it right, it will be an absolutely crazy good asset for Ukraine.
They need to use it as a sniper as we have seen Ukraine do with its own tanks, waiting in positions while camouflaged. Waiting for the right time to strike, take a few shots, and then use its ability to move backward to get out of there. Its backward speed is many times faster than any Ukrainian or Russian tank.
They need to use it for ambushes, it is fast and light so it can get in advantageous positions super fast.
They need to use them for flanking attacks, where their speed again is an advantage as so is their low weight. They have super good gun stabilization and con hit moving targets while driving at max speed.
Or they can use them as force multipliers supporting heavier western tanks or USSR-style tanks from the back. Should they get in trouble then they can get out of there fast.
I don't get why people don't see this is a super good choice to send to Ukraine.
@@mwtrolleyour comment aged like a fine milk, even leopard 2a6 got owned hahahahah
Leopard 1 firing on the move. I bet they hit 80% +.
Is it in service?
No, not anymore. Just at a military show 😊
It's in service in Grèce, Chilie !
Brazil uses the also,Leopard 1 A5
@@hevyc8353 I know, i'm from Brazil.
@@andrelunkes1038 i personaly belive the arms industry of Brazil is a sleeping giant...i like the Osorio tank your country made and the A 29 Super Tucano which goes from a desing from one of your planes :D
Recommended :)
Nog a Leo1 A5 bud a A4. They where the only ones with welded turrets
Denmark only had 1A5
It’s an A5 allright. We chose to keep the A4 turrets as they were better armored and spacier.
Originally A3, later modernized to A5-standard. A4 was only operated by the 10.Panzerdivision(Germany).
The Danish Leopard 1a5 are the only 1a5s with the welded turrets. The only thing they really did was change fcs and some other stuff inside hence why they still look like 1a4s
The 1a5 upgrade package can be applied to any older leopards its just that the germans wanted to modernise their older leopard 1s with the cast turrets and by the time these modifications were done the Leopard 2a4s had already entered service so the bundeswehr saw no reason to continue the upgrades really
Я так понимаю это собственная модернизация Леопард 1 ?
Yes
These even have air condition.
I Trink thats are Leopard 1A3 or A4.
I don't think so, I think all the Leopard 1 tanks at danish museums are 1A5DK, and the video quality do not make me think it can be old footage.
The 1a5 is just an internal upgrade package that can be given to any leopard 1s its just that the germans when they upgraded their leopard 1s chose their older ones and by the time it started being introduced the leopard 2s had already entered service and pretty much replaced the 1 in the mbt role. Hence why the bundeswehr gave leo 1s to recon units and also started selling a shitton to other nations and storing some
Holmberg 15A
Leopard 1 A 4
Мощнр
nice thing, why dont send to Ukraine
1 leopard 1 lacht über T90
Einen deutschen Panzer kann man nicht zerstören
@@jacknow1912 doch kann man. Er kann zerstört werden wie jeder panzer. Gerade der Leo 1 hat gerade mal 70mm panzerung
Might wanna change the title to leopard 1a4 live fire
No these were originally 1A3s but got upgraded to 1A5s later on in service, so the title is correct
@@magnum399 1a5dk and the 1a5dk1
The Danish version retains the welded turret.
Wenn man ihn in der Ukraine zum Einsatz bringen möchte, denn wird er noch einmal gründlich als A6 Variante überarbeitet werden müssen, wenn er es gegen russische Panzer neuster Bauart wie den T14, überstehen können soll. Aber davon werden die Russen auch noch nicht so viel haben, aber auch ein T90, würde der A5 Variante wahrscheinlich schon überlegen sein.
Also ohne entsprechende Modifikation, wird der Leo 1 bei den heutigen Kriegsanforderungen in der Ukraine, nicht bestehen können und wahrscheinlich komplett geschrottet werden.
der kommt im einsatz gegen t72 und gegen t62 ist er der dosenöffner schlechthin.
@@ImperialDiecast Gegen diese Panzer mag die Einschätzung zutreffend sein, nur dass man sich nicht aussuchen kann, was einem auf dem Schlachtfeld begegnen wird. Gegen einen T90 hingegen, bezweifele ich dass diese Einschätzung richtig sein wird und davon produzieren die Russen bestimmt eine Menge nach.
Pierdolisz,jak potrzaskany.Wszystko,co kacapskie,jest nic nie warte.Jeden Leopard zniszczy 30 kacapskich złomów na gąsiennicach.
Panzer gegen Panzer ist schon ein relativ unwahrscheinliches Szenario. So war das wohl damals aber heute? Übrigens, den T-14 wird Russland eher nicht einsetzen aus Angst vor Verlusten. Kostet zu viel Geld und kann evtl. nicht ersetzt werden. Aus demselben Grund sieht man auch von der russischen Luftwaffe so gut wie gar nichts.
That's leopard 1a4 not 1a5 because Leopard 1a5 not shape
No these were originally 1A3s but got upgraded to 1A5s later on in service
You are wrong The Forgotten History TFH!
leopard 1a5?😂 lost
Well it is
@@anyone1159 yea Leopard 1A5 roblox edition haha it's a Leopard 1A5 DK-1 not the original 1A5
@@Unknown-gu9nf yet its 1a5 standart.
@@anyone1159 the turret is clearly welded so it can't be LEO-1A5 , at best its up graded LEO-1A4.
@@paullakowski2509 ... its a 1a5dk. It has an a3 turret because their first batch were a3's but they upgraded them to 1a5 standard.