What I notice in this is 1 how better the tennis was 2 how generous they both are with each other 3 how quiet it is, the Australian crowd is probably the best
True World was better place to live in 2000's especially 2004-07.Crowds were surely better unfortunately these dayse in all place including australia crowd is just worst
Funny how so many people years ago talked about the H2H between Fed and Nole and how Fed benefited from so many matches before 2011. Well, they had 19 matches between 2006 and 2010 and 30 between 2011 and 2019, so .... who's really benefited from the age gap most in their rivalry? Djokovic, for getting to play 30+ Fed 26 times.
It would be fair if you guys said let's just disregard h2h for those reasons and focus on titles and weeks as no1. But no you want to make it seem like Federer should be leading 35-15 h2h if they were similar age and how most of his victories Djokovic didn't deserve. Also he should be leading against Nadal according to you people since he isn't supposed to use left handed forehand to attack Feds backhand like that's illegal for some reason.
@@draganduga2781 It's the Djokovic fans that are going on about the lead he has over Fed. I don't really care about H2H especially when the age gap is so vast.
@@kylejohansen689 yea, but Fed fans keep bringing his 6 1 score against Nadal in last 7 matches and explain it by racket change. Funny how it didn't work vs djokovic, also age suddenly isn't issue when he's dominating Nadal but suddenly becomes one when he's facing Novak
@@draganduga2781 Djokovic is better than Nadal on hard, for starters. Fed also has 7 wins against Novak with the bigger racquet, but of course Novak had the edge in majors where he could make it more physical. Age is more a factor in best of 5. He actually leads 7-6 since 2014 in best of 3. He also only dominated Nadal twice out of those six wins.
I remember Djokovic was so arrogant to say he was going to take Federer down that night. I was thinking to myself "no way." Federer was at the very top of his game...
![R.Federer vs F.González (Highlights) Australian Open 2007 Final [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/D7oiaLe4lTk/mqdefault.jpg)
![R.Federer vs F.González (Highlights) Australian Open 2007 Final [HD]](/img/tr.png)
What I notice in this is
1 how better the tennis was
2 how generous they both are with each other
3 how quiet it is, the Australian crowd is probably the best
True World was better place to live in 2000's especially 2004-07.Crowds were surely better unfortunately these dayse in all place including australia crowd is just worst
Funny how so many people years ago talked about the H2H between Fed and Nole and how Fed benefited from so many matches before 2011. Well, they had 19 matches between 2006 and 2010 and 30 between 2011 and 2019, so .... who's really benefited from the age gap most in their rivalry? Djokovic, for getting to play 30+ Fed 26 times.
Also a lot of people think 16 is greater than 20. No surprises.
It would be fair if you guys said let's just disregard h2h for those reasons and focus on titles and weeks as no1. But no you want to make it seem like Federer should be leading 35-15 h2h if they were similar age and how most of his victories Djokovic didn't deserve. Also he should be leading against Nadal according to you people since he isn't supposed to use left handed forehand to attack Feds backhand like that's illegal for some reason.
@@draganduga2781 It's the Djokovic fans that are going on about the lead he has over Fed. I don't really care about H2H especially when the age gap is so vast.
@@kylejohansen689 yea, but Fed fans keep bringing his 6 1 score against Nadal in last 7 matches and explain it by racket change. Funny how it didn't work vs djokovic, also age suddenly isn't issue when he's dominating Nadal but suddenly becomes one when he's facing Novak
@@draganduga2781 Djokovic is better than Nadal on hard, for starters. Fed also has 7 wins against Novak with the bigger racquet, but of course Novak had the edge in majors where he could make it more physical. Age is more a factor in best of 5. He actually leads 7-6 since 2014 in best of 3. He also only dominated Nadal twice out of those six wins.
I remember Djokovic was so arrogant to say he was going to take Federer down that night. I was thinking to myself "no way." Federer was at the very top of his game...
No he didnt lmao
Where did you get that from..?
Just look at the roger's movements.he was playing attacking tenies
True 2007 roger was best in australian open green court hard 2018 roger was best in blue hard
Unplayable lvl from Federer
True federer played his best in all matches of 2007 australian open he never lost set
Cuando Federer se lo paseaba en Australia xd
ese año nada mas porque despues djokovic se lo morfo en 2008, 2011 y 2016. Bailandolo a roger
@@Logan00710y en el 2020