The problem is not that they made the dolls anatomically correct. The problem is that they knowingly kept the information off the box, and took away the parents choice. This was absolutely intentional, and the CEO was extremely smug about it. In what world is it all right to “trick” someone’s child into looking at a penis?
I like how at the end the reporter said that the mother separated the boy dolls from the girl dolls. I know what she meant by that but I laughed because I pictured the mother being worried about the little girl dolls getting pregnant. 🤣
The issue here isn't about being anatomically correct. The issue is that they're designed to look like babies, but they have sex doll mouths and adult clothing.
Good OBSERVATION! Yes they're prepping these kids for PERPS TO BE OFFENDED. I JUST FOUND THIS AFTER THE TROLL DOLL SHIT. ASTONISHING AND PPL ARE ACTUALLY FALLING FOR IT BEING INNOCENT, THAT'S WHAT'S TRULY SCARY
@Frays the mii it's the mouths for me absolutely disgusting, it's hard though your seen as the crazy momma with a filthy mind saying no. I don't care luckily😂
Oh guess what, no damn kid sees the mouth as a sex doll.. the mouth is there so kid can feed water to doll, and the doll cries, spits, or pee, hence why they're also anatomically correct.
@@DoIIyMama is that so🤔Well my children range from 15 - 3 years old and I've never before seen such mouths firstly lol dolls can't be fed and secind baby born and Anna Bell or even baby all gone all ate/drank n they didn't have big filled lips open like that.
There children the o ly way they could figure out about srewing is if they watch a bad movie with a bad scene which idk think a parent would let them see oml
My 12 yr old son wants to petition to make them have underwear 😹 he thinks it’s gross that they don’t for the girl & boy dolls. It’s weird too some have printed on bikini tops & tank tops but nothing on the bottom... 😐 for the girls & boys, like why? If their giving it an irremovable top why not bottoms too 👀😐
@@m-ladybug depends on the intent, so how does the inappropriate clothing fit in when you place them in cold water? How about the devil tail and wings they found on the dolls? Or pizza tattoos??
@DeltaGem You’re at the furthest level of brainwashed disillusionment. The parents exposing this are the people who have figured out the level of control that the world has on your life and how you view the world. You’re completely asleep if you can’t even begin to understand the reality that a certain amount of people at the highest levels of social control are doing the most terrible things with the position they’re in. As they do that, they work to normalize that type of terrible behavior so, in the future, they can’t be legally and socially persecuted for what they do for pleasure. You’re failing to consider the final piece of the human psyche puzzle because you turn away from the insanity that you know exists in human beings. There are levels to human life. Good and evil exist at every level a human being exists at. These toys are just one product of what they do in an effort to further the normalization of sexuality at an earlier and earlier age so that they can manipulate other areas of the social world to control their sexual impulses and behavior. You might not be able to bridge this gap, but ultimately it is done to remove the masculinity from the foundation of the culture. That way it is collectively easier to control people.
Too bad that isn't how it works in 99% of households... And most of the "Sex Ed" classes were taken out of schools a long time ago I graduated in '05 and sex ed wasn't being taught in any of the schools I went to and I am a military child so I have been to a lot and in different states/countries... What is weak is that people are more upset about crap like this than they are the real-life kids being hurt and getting killed every day!!!
@@carmensimmons8556 how do you know it's 99%? Why limit sex ed to just schools? & if you're worried about kids getting hurt, go to another video or comment that supports that topic rather than being douche.
Some children don't have loving and trustworthy parents to teach such things. Its not like its a whole sex lesson, its simply a small difference between a female and male doll. What, are we supposed to make children think boys and girls are made the same way?
@@mindlessjulian1666 my parents never said sex in front of me, im sick of people being sensitive, just teach your kids basic fucking science and stop relying on the internet to educate your child FFS just open your spirit and mind and boomers just stop being fucking closed headed, just stop, when your kids gonna get pregnant cuz you didnt teach them basic fucking science are you gonna blame the Lol dolls too AHAHAHAH
So you don’t teach your child about anatomy? You don’t even have to talk about sex- if they ask, you say that that’s just boy/daddy parts. I don’t understand as an educator myself why people rather keep their kids ignorant about anatomy. That only increases the taboo/stigma.
RZVT well they have to learn at some point and I’m not saying to do it early cause my sister in law was in s3x Ed in 5th grade I learned puberty in 5th grade and seventh grade was when I learned about it I do agree that it is a bit wrong cause there minds would be focused on that but unlike some children some kid graduated from college at 9 and I know it dosent mean every other kid would but it dose depend on how and what they learn but also you don’t need to make atomic things s3xu4l for the kid to see it because all they would know now is why urinals exist and another thing don’t make children feel bad about there parts because of it if you tell them it’s bad two things can happen either the child is confused looks in the mirror looks at that part and says why do I have this and either cry cause of stress anxiety and stress anxiety disorders or they would know what you said because of the psa don’t take candy from strangers thing to reference that and don’t show that part in public you get what I’m sayin here bud
I'm even more upset that we are born with these parts because it's bad enough I see them on a doll but then I look down and OMG! I have the same part too! Disgusting
bruh parents are the people sexualizing the dolls 😐 like kids don’t see the same as adults do and if your child sees it the same way adults do, you have a lot of explanation to do.
You’re at the furthest level of brainwashed disillusionment. The parents exposing this are the people who have figured out the level of control that the world has on your life and how you view the world. You’re completely asleep if you can’t even begin to understand the reality that a certain amount of people at the highest levels of social control are doing the most terrible things with the position they’re in while working to normalize that type of behavior so they can’t be persecuted.
I have the same set IT SAYS ON THE DITECTIONS CLEARY " Boy dolls are automatically correct or something like that it says it like clearly on the paper! If you need to know it is on doll features black and white paper on the bottom
ya i kindof am against the anatomically correct doll thing but you are proving a pretty good point but these dolls are toys not things for research or school talk education so ya
I don't think the BIG issue is the male dolls having genitals. It's how they DRESS. Like, some of the girl dolls wear lingerie and other inappropriate clothing. That's my concern.
Absolutely no reason why any parent should be upset about that. Kids will learn about this in school and will eventually learn from there parents. There should be no issues with this when there are other toys that are just like these. The boys correctness is so small that it could be overlooked. I buy these for my daughter and I don't see what the issue is. Some parents need to explain to there kids that this is normal. Crazy.
where is the sex? Barbie had big boobs in 1959 when no doll ever had boobs, so he has a penis, so what? that is how boys are made. No little girl should know boys are different then girls? my 7 year old grandchild has a 2 year old brother, she sees his penis all the time since he was born, when he gets a bath or changes the diaper, she knows what it is and she is not shocked by it. if kids are shocked it's because parents make a big deal out of it.
@@toralthefurry3432 if they get shocked by having their kid seeing a penis they can always lock themselves in a room to change a diaper, reality is that it's part of the human body why should it not be on a doll? Barbie had big boobs in 1959 when no other doll had them. People get so shook up about a silly doll yet they accept child beauty pageants dressing their little girls like prostitutes, heavy makeup so on and so forth, No one shuts those down do they? I think that is worse then a penis on a doll, those pageants are great for pedophiles.
I personally have absolutely no problem with anatomically correct toys. I think they all should be that way so that kids know that our bodies are normal and natural an not everyone's looks the same. HOWEVER, knowing that not all families feel this way, doing this without warning parents on the box and in the ads is unforgivable. It doesn''t matter to me that I don't think the toys o the kids any harm. It upset the hell out of some parents, and that's enough reason for a simple warning label to me. Perhaps the toy industry could come up with a tasteful little symbol that warns parents without making a big deal out of it. Leave politics out of it and do what is right for people even when you do not agree with them.
I personally think every doll should offer two versions to the public an anatomically correct version and a false sense of reality doll for kids whose parents just can’t handle reality of body parts being seen by their kids . That way every parent can decide what they want for their kids and no one is being catered to either way . Labels would be a good idea as you suggested
I’ve seen how they look, it isn’t even detailed. It’s super stylized, not at all scandalous. Freaking over anatomically correct dolls in general is really weird in my opinion. Americans are WAY over sensitive when it comes to that stuff. Genitals are part of the body that- guess what!- children _also have_ . _Having a body_ is not inherently sexual. It’s a child’s toy. There’s nothing sexual or inappropriate about it.
Some people might say it’s “unnecessary” to add it, but it’s also unnecessary to remove. If you think of correct anatomy as the default-which it should be- removing it is way weirder than leaving it. It sends a sort of creepy message. There’s no reason to remove body parts, because they’re not inappropriate. Removing them is like saying that they need to be removed because they’re sexual, which is messed up because there’s nothing sexual about children’s dolls that are designed to look like literal toddlers. Stop sexualizing children.
Just think about the title though. Just think about it: “parents _upset_ over _anatomically_ *_correct_* dolls”... they’re upset that the dolls are medically accurate. “NO DON’T TEACH MY CHILDREN ABOUT THE FACT THAT THEY _HAVE BODIES_ AND OTHER PEOPLE DO TOO! I WAS TRYING TO HIDE THAT FROM THEM! Every time they go to the bathroom or take a bath I go in with them and make them wear a blindfold to make sure they don’t see their INAPPROPRIATE bodies!! I’m not telling them about the difference between boys and girls’ bodies until AFTER they get MARRIED, and that’s MY DECISION! NO ONE ELSE SHOULD GIVE MY CHILD ACCESS TO _TRUE INFORMATION_ AGAINST MY WILL!” “I NEED TO PROTECT MY 5 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER FROM KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF PENISES OR SHE’ll GET PREGNANT! eVerYoNe KnOwS tHat LiTtLe KiDs StArT hAvInG sEx ImMeDiAtElY wHeN tHeY lEaRn AbOuT pRiVaTe PaRtS!!” “EWW THIS DOLL HAS BODY PARTS THAT ACTUAL PEOPLE HAVE THAT’S DISGUSTING” Do they hear themselves?
These dolls are absolutely disgusting. I got one of these dolls when I was little and it was disgusting it’s terrible how I learned what these were and how they looked a couple years later when the O.M.G dolls came out I got one and they we’re wearing thongs it’s just disgusting how a brand that normally produces items for children would do this.
@@can78557 Kids shouldn't be exposed to anatomically correct bodies because that includes including SEXUAL organs. A penis with balls on a doll isn't something that I am subjectively sexualizing. A penis is literally a sexual organ, and kids should not be exposed to such things until they're old enough.
People need to know the dolls are made by the creator of brats dolls people need know there was other anatomically correct dolls like the baby alive boy wets and wiggles for 2006
There going to see something like that in there life, so why be upset? 😂 Edit: Y'all the male organ isn't "sexual" neither is the toy stop sexualizing a part that's completely normal and the packaging of the toy clearly states it's gonna have that part if you bought it and don't like it then that's your problem don't blame it on the company
@@KeatonChandeIier 😂 look, a 9 year old trying her hardest to fight. I’ll go easy on you because I know you won’t be able to handle it. Now, go change your soggy diaper and fuck off 😄🤗
Male baby borns use to have the atomically correct genitalia... when I was a kid I didn't think anything of it because that's just the way my mum brought me up... I didn't think it was sexual... it was just a baby born which happened to have genitalia to me.
This is disgusting our body’s are not to be ashamed and not to be separated from others this is horrible I’m so angry now how could a mum separate her childs boy doll from the girl dolls just because it has that the world needs to change god created our body stile so we should respect that
yes, but kids are too YOUNG to worry about that kind of thing. you should teach your kid about to treat everyone the same but BODY PARTS do not have to be involved
@•Just Kam• no its ok....its not ok at all. Can ask you somthing. How scaird where you when you went if for your first papsmire? Or have you even had it yet? If so its becase you thought it was bad because you were not probably educated. The vagina and penise should not be a secret.
because its not necessary. this is a kids toy and kids dont need to know NONE of this at that young of an age, I dont hate lol but this is disturbing. even CHILDREN are disturbed by this.
@@toralthefurry3432 bro what? I think basic anatomy should be taught from a young age, especially in this day and age. u should literally be teaching ur kid abt their private areas, and how they shouldn't let anyone touch it, and how they shouldn't touch anyone elses.
Anatomically correct isn't the problem... it's the fact that they didn't give a heads up about it... there's only a certain type of parent who would want that type of doll for their child... and those who DO want that, would be wanting to have a conversation about it with their little ones before giving it to them, so they are not just confused, shocked, and most likely exposed to the opposite sex's private area for the first time EVER. Without their parents knowledge at that smdh. Totally inappropriate and sketchy. There is so much wrong with the LOL Doll Franchise. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Keep looking and you will find more and more smdh. God bless, stay safe, keep ya children safe, and protected. And that's all I have to say about this, goodbye yall. 💞
Another thing wrong is that some dolls wear inappropriately themed lingerie when dipped into water with a cold or hot temperature. Even the YOUNGEST sibling of the specific lol family may have inappropriate lingerie, and the youngest is a literal BABY.
Leaving out the fact that they were anatomically correct should have been included with description on the box in ANY case. A parents job it's their discretion of appropriate toys unaware parent should not be caught off guard by negating facts on packaging. It's wrong to do this!
These parents are clearly pressed. I swear to god these overly dramatic soccer moms need to stop. Children need to realise that not everybody has the same body.
they are just trying to protect 5 year olds and a 5 year old doesn't need to know that at their age. like if your gonna teach anatomy dont use a doll. excuses excuses...
@@toralthefurry3432 "Protect" them from the human body? You think knowing about a body part is somehow harmful to children? I'm guessing you've never had a younger sibling of the opposite sex.
@@themuttonqueen1076 That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they are too young to learn puberty through a DOLL. I mean go ahead teach a 5 year old things they aren't supposed to know yet go ahead. But this doll does NOT teach about anatomy at all. It's not that deep at all. It's simply just a toy. I don't have younger siblings, I have older siblings. And I already know anatomy but I don't need to know it at 5 YEARS OLD! Children are actually uncomfortable with this toy, they don't feel happy about it at all. Stop making excuses it's not okay to justify this disgusting doll. And before you go saying "Ohhh well what if they were sexually abused and don't know how to tell their parents???" I mean kids don't need to know anatomy to gather up courage to tell their parents. In fact if they learned at that age they would probably think it's OKAY to be sexually abused! If you taught them in the wrong way, if you're like ohh its just the human body its fine then they are gonna find it ok to touch others parts and stuff. A doll isn't gonna save a kids life for having anatomically correct parts. If you're gonna teach a kindergardener about those things then don't use a doll.
People are acting like these dolls are used for research. They're used for kids to play with, its not really necessary.. but hey if fashionable baby genitals is your thing.... Go off..?
@@toralthefurry3432 Yes, the stripper clothing is inappropriate for their age. But not telling or explaining to kids about the other gender can confuse them. How about we start making Barbie doll's with no breasts? Because children don't need doll's with normal human body structures?
The toy itself is a toy. They don't play with the parts specifically, so really that one part of your comment makes less sense now that is said. They play with the toy as a whole. They dress up the dolls and make small roleplays. I don't see the fuss.
Right, well it says nothing of a penis on the box, as mothers would certainly want to know before giving one to their child. So. Assuming you don’t have children? If you do....😳
It has nothing to do with shame.. Do these people not understand the steps taken are to limit the chances of a child being victimized by a predator. We’re also trying to keep our child’s innocence.. That works through multiple ways of properly raising a child. I can’t stand shyt like this.. It’s hard enough keeping your children safe from predators. It’s like our society has been working against our best interests for decades now. We’ve opened the borders to an unbelievable amount of predators that were not raised in our society. People that don’t hold our values or share our culture or history. We have enough problems of our own to deal with.. Our children are number 1.
You're not keeping your childern safe if you don't let them know touching someone's private part is wrong, these dolls can be a way to teach kids to not let anyone touch them there.
@@toralthefurry3432 it's a helpful tool that can be used to show where its located, kinda what it looks like. its a very easy concept to grasp, yet I see u in every single comment in here lmao
@@sampound2163 sure, teach them about their own parts, but they dont need to know about the other parts YET! they will learn it someday but JUST. NOT. AT THE MOMENT,
I don't like the fact they blurred it, like, I understand they have to but what if this is a made up story? At least this isn't as bad as the Poppy doll. Tch, what a shame this world is! Why would you put that on a doll for three year olds? I've also heard that the LOL dolls have came in inappropriate clothings, such as thongs and lingerie. Let's hope something happens to people like this, it's ridiculous. Smh. 🤦♂
My thing is on most girl dolls private parts there is something that resembles the shape of a female anatomy so why should it be different with male dolls. Also I searched it up and it’s not that bad at all it’s just a tiny nub on the bottom
I don't know what dolls you have seen that have 'something' the resembles female anatomy. I am from America so that could explain the difference in our experiences, but all the dolls I have ever seen that were either intended to be female or not otherwise indicated to be male were flat and smooth with a featureless groin area. At most there may be a horizontal seam were the plastic was joined between the legs on cheaper dolls and some had a hole drilled in them directly between the legs if the doll was intended to wet/soil its diaper or use a toilet. Never was there anything that resembled female anatomy in any of these dolls. I owned several kinds of dolls growing up - all female or basically female as only clothes differated the sexes of doll in the 80s and 90s, when I owned dolls the most. None of the dolls I grew up with or have seen since have had anything that resembled female or male anatomy without being clearly marked as being anatomically correct. Those that were intended to be realistic still lacked some key details as the one female baby doll fat rolls in her groin and no implied holes or actual holes. The male baby doll (baby alive boy doll) had a molded mound with a tiny stub on end barely stuck out in the same place any other doll would have been flat and had a much larger hole. Pressing a button on the doll's belly made any liquid inside the doll to come out his stub/penis. It was far less realistic than what the boy LOL dolls have. I would think that having all dolls that wet just a hole and no molded parts is easier for emptying liquid form inside a doll and cheaper to make. I've noticed that anatomically correct male dolls go in and out of fashion. I did want one as a child for a novelty of it, but not all children want their toys to have that degree of realism. Over all I agree that if a doll is made for children and is anatomically correct in some form it should be made very clear so parents and children are not surprised by it after buying the toy.
Bro my sister had a doll when she was little and it had a willy and my family found it really funny I find it funny to this day "What's a doll doing with a willy?" - my funny dad😂😂
Isn't this a good thing? Kids should learn at a young age touching someone's private part is wrong and disgusting, so if someone does it to them, they aren't just confused, and actually tell someone they trust. With these dolls clothing, they are called Lil Outrageous Littles (L.O.L) so obviously they're going to wear outrageous and creative clothing. It would also be nice to let kids know someone's clothing isn't consent.
ok i agree with you but the thing is, these dolls arent teaching any of that. the dolls look like babies yet they are wearing slightly innapropriate clothes. if you want to teach your kids about this why not wait until they are ready or maybe not let a few strangers designing toys teach about they are ready?
@@toralthefurry3432 well thats the style these days. dunno what ur referring to, but showing ur stomach in a crop top shouldn't be labeled as "sexy" or "inappropriate". its perverts that sexualize ppl for wearing crop tops.
*Important?* These dolls can scare kids. Children are too young to learn about this stuff. The fact that they are doing this to these small dolls meant for kids is not only unneccesary, but its DISTURBING! These dolls can affect children's mental health.
@@toralthefurry3432 no, why tf would a penis on a doll affect a Childs mental health? its not even like a full penis, its 3 tiny little bits of plastic.
It’s kind of stupid so what it has a little pee pee. I feel like it’s good for kids to learn about the human body because the human body is only sexualized because people make it
I don’t mind the fact that they have private parts- I mean, we have them too 😑. My problem is the way they’re dressing the dolls, which I’m pretty sure are meant to represent young kids. My opinion is not always the same as others, but it had to be said.
AND my daughter is 10 and she has the set even 8 year olds are old enough you just need to overlook the " mistake" there going to learn later in life of course.
@•Just Kam• I understand the concern, but when I was a child I had a friend with a baby boy doll that had normal private parts and no one ever saw it as sexual or weird, (they actually were common were I live, they try to make them realistic because they are normally for collectors)
Your children are typically taught the difference between girls and boys and are taught why they are different and the reason they are taught is for their own safety, so i really don't get why people are freaking out, especially when the show and the dolls aren't for little kids, it is for preteens and such.
They can embrace me flipping them off and never supporting them. Can't blame parents. But why have they never complained about big boobed barbie. Yep, we're in a pick and choose world for sure
@@hubert1154 Just imagine that children have BOTH(!) anat. correct variants. Without sexual clothing...or without ANY clothing... Next step... (Children are very curious)
@@happysunshine1988 Technically, they could make their genital-less dolls do the deed already. Giving dolls anatomically correct parts is not inherently sexual nor will most children see it as such. Parents should be educating their children that boys and girls are different anatomically in the first place. Do you think it's going to destroy their innocence or something?
Anatomically correct doesn't bother me, but dolls representing babies, little girlswearing underwear made for women do
Anatomically correct dolls for children, weak.
Do.Not.Subscribe. ?
Julieanne McCulloch same
Completely agree, and I mean what is American consumerism, if not about selling sex.
The problem is not that they made the dolls anatomically correct. The problem is that they knowingly kept the information off the box, and took away the parents choice. This was absolutely intentional, and the CEO was extremely smug about it.
In what world is it all right to “trick” someone’s child into looking at a penis?
_i mean, it was a surprise, but not a lol surprise._
tbh if you think about it is an *lol surprise*
Good one
until you realize what LOL stands for....LOL Dolls "Little Outrageous Littles" outrageous definition (via Oxford Languages) : out·ra·geous
/outˈrājəs/ adjective 1.shockingly bad or excessive. "an outrageous act of bribery" Similar: shocking, disgraceful, scandalous, appalling, shameful, infamous 2.very bold, unusual, and startling. "her outrageous leotards and sexy routines" Similar: eye-catching, startling, striking, flamboyant, showy, flashy
U wrong for that 😂😂
lolpenis
I'm OFFENDED! That they blurred the freakin picture of a doll.
Ikr
Its crazy its just a DOLL Jesse.......
@@beulahcoker8227 exactly
Same I’m offended too
i frickin now right?
I like how at the end the reporter said that the mother separated the boy dolls from the girl dolls. I know what she meant by that but I laughed because I pictured the mother being worried about the little girl dolls getting pregnant. 🤣
Lol I bet she burst out laughing after the take
XD
@@stillmint_2724 facts
OMG SO FUNNY 😂🤣
😂
The issue here isn't about being anatomically correct. The issue is that they're designed to look like babies, but they have sex doll mouths and adult clothing.
Good OBSERVATION! Yes they're prepping these kids for PERPS TO BE OFFENDED. I JUST FOUND THIS AFTER THE TROLL DOLL SHIT. ASTONISHING AND PPL ARE ACTUALLY FALLING FOR IT BEING INNOCENT, THAT'S WHAT'S TRULY SCARY
Exactly! I refuse to buy my lil girl them as they look like bratts with tiny bodies to me
@Frays the mii it's the mouths for me absolutely disgusting, it's hard though your seen as the crazy momma with a filthy mind saying no. I don't care luckily😂
Oh guess what, no damn kid sees the mouth as a sex doll.. the mouth is there so kid can feed water to doll, and the doll cries, spits, or pee, hence why they're also anatomically correct.
@@DoIIyMama is that so🤔Well my children range from 15 - 3 years old and I've never before seen such mouths firstly lol dolls can't be fed and secind baby born and Anna Bell or even baby all gone all ate/drank n they didn't have big filled lips open like that.
1:28 "But she HAS separated the boy dolls from the girl dolls"... whew! THATs good! Would want them screwing and having baby dolls.
There children the o ly way they could figure out about srewing is if they watch a bad movie with a bad scene which idk think a parent would let them see oml
I just commented the same thing like wth 😐🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
😹😹😹
I dont disagree but I dont think they even know what that is- Like your girls will say "Ew, boys" Y'know what I mean?
My 12 yr old son wants to petition to make them have underwear 😹 he thinks it’s gross that they don’t for the girl & boy dolls. It’s weird too some have printed on bikini tops & tank tops but nothing on the bottom... 😐 for the girls & boys, like why? If their giving it an irremovable top why not bottoms too 👀😐
I'm surprised she was more concerned over the dolls being anatomically correct than the clothes that they were wearing...
What's wrong with the clothes, fisy stick
Yeah the clothes are over the edge
I mean i had two twin baby dolls when I was a baby and they were Atomically correct as well. honestly whatever
@DeltaGem and if she had two real babies and they have parts is that pedophilia normalization?? NO
@@m-ladybug depends on the intent, so how does the inappropriate clothing fit in when you place them in cold water? How about the devil tail and wings they found on the dolls? Or pizza tattoos??
@DeltaGem You’re at the furthest level of brainwashed disillusionment. The parents exposing this are the people who have figured out the level of control that the world has on your life and how you view the world. You’re completely asleep if you can’t even begin to understand the reality that a certain amount of people at the highest levels of social control are doing the most terrible things with the position they’re in. As they do that, they work to normalize that type of terrible behavior so, in the future, they can’t be legally and socially persecuted for what they do for pleasure. You’re failing to consider the final piece of the human psyche puzzle because you turn away from the insanity that you know exists in human beings. There are levels to human life. Good and evil exist at every level a human being exists at.
These toys are just one product of what they do in an effort to further the normalization of sexuality at an earlier and earlier age so that they can manipulate other areas of the social world to control their sexual impulses and behavior. You might not be able to bridge this gap, but ultimately it is done to remove the masculinity from the foundation of the culture. That way it is collectively easier to control people.
I think I had the exact same dolls. Because they were Twins and they were both anatomically correct
@DarkGem elaborate please
*Should be the parents job to teach anatomy or at least by health class, not toy companies, weak.*
Too bad that isn't how it works in 99% of households... And most of the "Sex Ed" classes were taken out of schools a long time ago I graduated in '05 and sex ed wasn't being taught in any of the schools I went to and I am a military child so I have been to a lot and in different states/countries... What is weak is that people are more upset about crap like this than they are the real-life kids being hurt and getting killed every day!!!
@@carmensimmons8556 how do you know it's 99%? Why limit sex ed to just schools? & if you're worried about kids getting hurt, go to another video or comment that supports that topic rather than being douche.
Some children don't have loving and trustworthy parents to teach such things. Its not like its a whole sex lesson, its simply a small difference between a female and male doll. What, are we supposed to make children think boys and girls are made the same way?
@@mindlessjulian1666 my parents never said sex in front of me, im sick of people being sensitive, just teach your kids basic fucking science and stop relying on the internet to educate your child FFS just open your spirit and mind and boomers just stop being fucking closed headed, just stop, when your kids gonna get pregnant cuz you didnt teach them basic fucking science are you gonna blame the Lol dolls too AHAHAHAH
@@mindlessjulian1666 i totally agree with you and Barbie has been censoring the private areas FOREVER, STOP THE STIGMA
So you don’t teach your child about anatomy? You don’t even have to talk about sex- if they ask, you say that that’s just boy/daddy parts. I don’t understand as an educator myself why people rather keep their kids ignorant about anatomy. That only increases the taboo/stigma.
I just say boy parts... Saying daddy parts is weird lol
Should be the parents job to teach anatomy or at least by health class, not toy companies, weak.
I think that its more of getting upset that toy companies are trying to do the teaching and they need to stay out of it.
Laina Collins, Hey pervert! You don't get it, right? It's parent's job not toy companies specially without a description in the box. SICK.
I don't think they should put those on the dolls but the Mom needs to get rid of them or let the daughter keep both.
I’m fine with atomically correct but how they dress the girls and boys is a big no no for me
LOL Atomic bomb dolls
These are kids they shouldn’t be seeing stuff like that wtf
RZVT no
RZVT well they have to learn at some point and I’m not saying to do it early cause my sister in law was in s3x Ed in 5th grade I learned puberty in 5th grade and seventh grade was when I learned about it I do agree that it is a bit wrong cause there minds would be focused on that but unlike some children some kid graduated from college at 9 and I know it dosent mean every other kid would but it dose depend on how and what they learn but also you don’t need to make atomic things s3xu4l for the kid to see it because all they would know now is why urinals exist and another thing don’t make children feel bad about there parts because of it if you tell them it’s bad two things can happen either the child is confused looks in the mirror looks at that part and says why do I have this and either cry cause of stress anxiety and stress anxiety disorders or they would know what you said because of the psa don’t take candy from strangers thing to reference that and don’t show that part in public you get what I’m sayin here bud
RZVT oh and I forgot one time they put an fing collor on the girl doll seems a bit innocent enough but it says S.L.A.V.E. On it
I'm even more upset that we are born with these parts because it's bad enough I see them on a doll but then I look down and OMG! I have the same part too! Disgusting
Lmao
Right.. how dare we..
How dare god not censor people!!!! That's it I'm suing heaven
IKR HOW DARE THEY NOT CENSOR US!!!!
@@miruku6591 IM SUEING GOD!!
bruh parents are the people sexualizing the dolls 😐 like kids don’t see the same as adults do and if your child sees it the same way adults do, you have a lot of explanation to do.
You’re at the furthest level of brainwashed disillusionment. The parents exposing this are the people who have figured out the level of control that the world has on your life and how you view the world. You’re completely asleep if you can’t even begin to understand the reality that a certain amount of people at the highest levels of social control are doing the most terrible things with the position they’re in while working to normalize that type of behavior so they can’t be persecuted.
I have the same set IT SAYS ON THE DITECTIONS CLEARY " Boy dolls are automatically correct or something like that it says it like clearly on the paper! If you need to know it is on doll features black and white paper on the bottom
ya i kindof am against the anatomically correct doll thing but you are proving a pretty good point but these dolls are toys not things for research or school talk education so ya
@Me Too yeah i agree they need to look at the paper
i still think its wrong to put that on the doll but still it says on the paper
Anatomically******
@@elipatches8577 nobody needs you to CORRECT their grammar
@@toralthefurry3432 get off my comment its not directed at you
The joke's on you...LOL SURPRISE!
I don't think the BIG issue is the male dolls having genitals. It's how they DRESS. Like, some of the girl dolls wear lingerie and other inappropriate clothing. That's my concern.
Absolutely no reason why any parent should be upset about that. Kids will learn about this in school and will eventually learn from there parents. There should be no issues with this when there are other toys that are just like these. The boys correctness is so small that it could be overlooked. I buy these for my daughter and I don't see what the issue is. Some parents need to explain to there kids that this is normal. Crazy.
So true! I have the same set!
Crystal Richmond I agree with you
@•Just Kam• well the toys are marketed 5+ for a reason lol
they’re “forgetting” this toy is for children and it’s not their place to show other people’s kids things
Theres absolutely no reason to make these dolls that way. Sexuality should be taught at HOME..not by toy companies. Morals have gone out the window.
where is the sex? Barbie had big boobs in 1959 when no doll ever had boobs, so he has a penis, so what? that is how boys are made. No little girl should know boys are different then girls? my 7 year old grandchild has a 2 year old brother, she sees his penis all the time since he was born, when he gets a bath or changes the diaper, she knows what it is and she is not shocked by it. if kids are shocked it's because parents make a big deal out of it.
How is this talking about sexuality in anyway how is a child knowing the difference between men and woman’s bodies in any way sexual
@@hieithefox the problem are the mothers not the silly doll
@@gr122 its a 5 year old toy and thats irrelevant because changing a kids diaper is something actually necessary
@@toralthefurry3432 if they get shocked by having their kid seeing a penis they can always lock themselves in a room to change a diaper, reality is that it's part of the human body why should it not be on a doll? Barbie
had big boobs in 1959 when no other doll had them. People get so shook up about a silly doll yet they accept child beauty pageants dressing their little girls like prostitutes, heavy makeup so on and so forth, No one shuts those down do they? I think that is worse then a penis on a doll, those pageants are great for pedophiles.
Oh good god! We all have genatols. Why dont we just cut them off
Hellosimpledays what
@DeltaGem how r they a pervert
@@toralthefurry3432 because they're justifying the genitals on the kids toys.
Mga dont listen
@DeltaGem fuck off! we all have pussies and dicks too! i obviously feel bad for ppl who are offended
I personally have absolutely no problem with anatomically correct toys. I think they all should be that way so that kids know that our bodies are normal and natural an not everyone's looks the same. HOWEVER, knowing that not all families feel this way, doing this without warning parents on the box and in the ads is unforgivable. It doesn''t matter to me that I don't think the toys o the kids any harm. It upset the hell out of some parents, and that's enough reason for a simple warning label to me. Perhaps the toy industry could come up with a tasteful little symbol that warns parents without making a big deal out of it. Leave politics out of it and do what is right for people even when you do not agree with them.
I personally think every doll should offer two versions to the public an anatomically correct version and a false sense of reality doll for kids whose parents just can’t handle reality of body parts being seen by their kids . That way every parent can decide what they want for their kids and no one is being catered to either way . Labels would be a good idea as you suggested
I don’t care that they’re anatomically correct, I hate the clothes they put the dolls in. There’s no excuse for that.
Dont take your child to the museum for God's sake
-Doesn’t have kids
Facts because damn near every statue of a man has "boy parts" smmfh
Especially one with Greek statues lol
I’ve seen how they look, it isn’t even detailed. It’s super stylized, not at all scandalous. Freaking over anatomically correct dolls in general is really weird in my opinion. Americans are WAY over sensitive when it comes to that stuff. Genitals are part of the body that- guess what!- children _also have_ . _Having a body_ is not inherently sexual. It’s a child’s toy. There’s nothing sexual or inappropriate about it.
Some people might say it’s “unnecessary” to add it, but it’s also unnecessary to remove. If you think of correct anatomy as the default-which it should be- removing it is way weirder than leaving it. It sends a sort of creepy message. There’s no reason to remove body parts, because they’re not inappropriate. Removing them is like saying that they need to be removed because they’re sexual, which is messed up because there’s nothing sexual about children’s dolls that are designed to look like literal toddlers. Stop sexualizing children.
“OH MY GOD THIS TOY HAS A BODY PART THAT LITERALLY EVERYONE HAS!!!”
Shut up.
Just think about the title though. Just think about it: “parents _upset_ over _anatomically_ *_correct_* dolls”... they’re upset that the dolls are medically accurate.
“NO DON’T TEACH MY CHILDREN ABOUT THE FACT THAT THEY _HAVE BODIES_ AND OTHER PEOPLE DO TOO! I WAS TRYING TO HIDE THAT FROM THEM! Every time they go to the bathroom or take a bath I go in with them and make them wear a blindfold to make sure they don’t see their INAPPROPRIATE bodies!! I’m not telling them about the difference between boys and girls’ bodies until AFTER they get MARRIED, and that’s MY DECISION! NO ONE ELSE SHOULD GIVE MY CHILD ACCESS TO _TRUE INFORMATION_ AGAINST MY WILL!”
“I NEED TO PROTECT MY 5 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER FROM KNOWLEDGE OF THE EXISTENCE OF PENISES OR SHE’ll GET PREGNANT! eVerYoNe KnOwS tHat LiTtLe KiDs StArT hAvInG sEx ImMeDiAtElY wHeN tHeY lEaRn AbOuT pRiVaTe PaRtS!!”
“EWW THIS DOLL HAS BODY PARTS THAT ACTUAL PEOPLE HAVE THAT’S DISGUSTING”
Do they hear themselves?
Americans are obsessed with genitals, skin color, and religion.
It literally says “anatomically correct” on the packaging. These moms need to pay attention.
I want these dolls now
@@armyshope I have a few I could sell ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
These dolls are absolutely disgusting. I got one of these dolls when I was little and it was disgusting it’s terrible how I learned what these were and how they looked a couple years later when the O.M.G dolls came out I got one and they we’re wearing thongs it’s just disgusting how a brand that normally produces items for children would do this.
why can’t the company just put the plastic underwear on the doll to cover that area like barbie and ken dolls?
Karenss i tell you KARENSSSS 🤦♀️
just to explain: the boys are anatomically correct because one of the features is "wetting themselves" that's all
Still inappropriate for KIDS
@@avapilsen how is it inappropriate? It's literally normal, it's just that you people are the ones, sexualizing the part not the company
@@can78557 Kids shouldn't be exposed to anatomically correct bodies because that includes including SEXUAL organs. A penis with balls on a doll isn't something that I am subjectively sexualizing. A penis is literally a sexual organ, and kids should not be exposed to such things until they're old enough.
@@avapilsen That part isn't sexual stop sexualizing it it's a normal part that MOST people have
@@can78557 You're an idiot if you really think a penis and vagina aren't sexual organs.
People need to know the dolls are made by the creator of brats dolls people need know there was other anatomically correct dolls like the baby alive boy wets and wiggles for 2006
Why do dolls need sexual anotomy?
There going to see something like that in there life, so why be upset? 😂 Edit: Y'all the male organ isn't "sexual" neither is the toy stop sexualizing a part that's completely normal and the packaging of the toy clearly states it's gonna have that part if you bought it and don't like it then that's your problem don't blame it on the company
@@isip0ki True but still they are going to see that in there life at least once :T
@@can78557 doesn't mean they have to now when the time will come they will know about it I would rather keep my childs innocence
@@isip0ki Well I'm young myself and I know for a fact most children aren't innocent as they seem..
@@can78557 obviously
@@isip0ki 👌
The Karen’s are coming! Runnnn everyone!
Yes
@@browtf4640 Omg we got a Karen lover over here- Go back to your tool shed bob! 😰
@@KeatonChandeIier 😂 look, a 9 year old trying her hardest to fight. I’ll go easy on you because I know you won’t be able to handle it. Now, go change your soggy diaper and fuck off 😄🤗
@@KeatonChandeIier 🤣 my name ain’t bob, and i ain’t no she. I’m non binary, get it right 😌
@@KeatonChandeIier Well the tool shed ain’t too off I actually do like to build things 🤔 that’s about the only thing you got right
Male baby borns use to have the atomically correct genitalia... when I was a kid I didn't think anything of it because that's just the way my mum brought me up... I didn't think it was sexual... it was just a baby born which happened to have genitalia to me.
Prudes are sexualizing and making something stupid perverted.
This is disgusting our body’s are not to be ashamed and not to be separated from others this is horrible I’m so angry now how could a mum separate her childs boy doll from the girl dolls just because it has that the world needs to change god created our body stile so we should respect that
yes, but kids are too YOUNG to worry about that kind of thing. you should teach your kid about to treat everyone the same but BODY PARTS do not have to be involved
@•Just Kam• no its ok....its not ok at all. Can ask you somthing. How scaird where you when you went if for your first papsmire? Or have you even had it yet? If so its becase you thought it was bad because you were not probably educated. The vagina and penise should not be a secret.
@@toralthefurry3432 why tf should body parts not be involved? its literally basic human anatomy, and its written on the box.
because its not necessary. this is a kids toy and kids dont need to know NONE of this at that young of an age, I dont hate lol but this is disturbing. even CHILDREN are disturbed by this.
@@toralthefurry3432 bro what? I think basic anatomy should be taught from a young age, especially in this day and age. u should literally be teaching ur kid abt their private areas, and how they shouldn't let anyone touch it, and how they shouldn't touch anyone elses.
That message itself from Lol dolls was cryptic
Thank god the mother seperated the boy dolls from the girl dolls, they would have been playing doctor as soon as the toybox was closed.
😭
Anatomically correct isn't the problem... it's the fact that they didn't give a heads up about it... there's only a certain type of parent who would want that type of doll for their child... and those who DO want that, would be wanting to have a conversation about it with their little ones before giving it to them, so they are not just confused, shocked, and most likely exposed to the opposite sex's private area for the first time EVER. Without their parents knowledge at that smdh. Totally inappropriate and sketchy. There is so much wrong with the LOL Doll Franchise. This is just the tip of the iceberg. Keep looking and you will find more and more smdh. God bless, stay safe, keep ya children safe, and protected. And that's all I have to say about this, goodbye yall. 💞
Another thing wrong is that some dolls wear inappropriately themed lingerie when dipped into water with a cold or hot temperature. Even the YOUNGEST sibling of the specific lol family may have inappropriate lingerie, and the youngest is a literal BABY.
When they said Amy Rose I thought of Amy Rose from Sonic lol
Me too lmao 😅
Same lol 😂
Me too
Just remeber; people made concept art and went into full production with this.
Leaving out the fact that they were anatomically correct should have been included with description on the box in ANY case. A parents job it's their discretion of appropriate toys unaware parent should not be caught off guard by negating facts on packaging. It's wrong to do this!
Clearly states in black and white on the paper in the box with the toy's anatomically correct
@@savannahparton9277 a paper in the box... 🙄🙄🙄
So you gotta buy to to read that smh🤡
These parents are clearly pressed. I swear to god these overly dramatic soccer moms need to stop. Children need to realise that not everybody has the same body.
exactly! they are so stupid
they are just trying to protect 5 year olds and a 5 year old doesn't need to know that at their age. like if your gonna teach anatomy dont use a doll.
excuses excuses...
@@toralthefurry3432 protect 5 year olds..? gurl what
@@toralthefurry3432 "Protect" them from the human body? You think knowing about a body part is somehow harmful to children? I'm guessing you've never had a younger sibling of the opposite sex.
@@themuttonqueen1076 That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that they are too young to learn puberty through a DOLL. I mean go ahead teach a 5 year old things they aren't supposed to know yet go ahead. But this doll does NOT teach about anatomy at all. It's not that deep at all. It's simply just a toy. I don't have younger siblings, I have older siblings. And I already know anatomy but I don't need to know it at 5 YEARS OLD! Children are actually uncomfortable with this toy, they don't feel happy about it at all. Stop making excuses it's not okay to justify this disgusting doll. And before you go saying "Ohhh well what if they were sexually abused and don't know how to tell their parents???" I mean kids don't need to know anatomy to gather up courage to tell their parents. In fact if they learned at that age they would probably think it's OKAY to be sexually abused! If you taught them in the wrong way, if you're like ohh its just the human body its fine then they are gonna find it ok to touch others parts and stuff. A doll isn't gonna save a kids life for having anatomically correct parts. If you're gonna teach a kindergardener about those things then don't use a doll.
Wait until the doll is put into freezing cold water. It shows extremely inappropriate outfits when cold.
The only fricking problem is
that they wear clothing that teens or women wear it is just
gross . And making them wear
„sexy“ clothing!
“Karens”
there was a similar story in a past decade but I can't recall the product's name or the year.
Its nothing to worry about almost all lol surprise boys are that way
@•Just Kam• agreed.
Beulah Coker you are 100% right
People are acting like these dolls are used for research.
They're used for kids to play with, its not really necessary.. but hey if fashionable baby genitals is your thing.... Go off..?
@@blueberryjollyrancher1821 why is it a bad thing? if anything, its a good way to teach ur kid abt how boys and girls have different private areas
@•Just Kam• then they don't have to take the clothes off
I just came across this today... and my parents took it and have no idea what to do with it. They told me that this is inappropriate
First the Karen’s ruin monster high now there gonna ruin lol suprize🙄
The company is run by pedophiles . My daughter just got a trans lol ... thats sick..
The first time I saw an LOL doll was when I was 7, I don't think I wanted to see a tiny pen!s on a doll tbh.
Chill ma’am it’s just a doll...
@DeltaGem How? You obviously haven't ever met a boy
a doll that can make kids feel uncomfortable?
DeltaGem ok thank you stranger🥰
@@gabiisqueen3652 kids dont need a doll with a pp on it or stripper clothes.
@@toralthefurry3432 Yes, the stripper clothing is inappropriate for their age. But not telling or explaining to kids about the other gender can confuse them. How about we start making Barbie doll's with no breasts? Because children don't need doll's with normal human body structures?
AMY ROSES DAUGHTER !?
ME:Amy rose?
AMY ROSE?????? YOOOOOOO
I’m upset... I need to pay more attention... You THINK?! 😂
Its not the toys job to teach kids anatomy. Especially considering its on a TOY. It teaches kids that their genitals are toys to be played eith
Thank you!
The toy itself is a toy. They don't play with the parts specifically, so really that one part of your comment makes less sense now that is said. They play with the toy as a whole. They dress up the dolls and make small roleplays. I don't see the fuss.
I LOVE lol dolls IF you don’t want ur children to have that kind of toy then buy lol girl because they don’t have that thing that lol boys have
You don't know what doll your getting...its a SUPRISE DOLL
Then check the picture of all the doll and if u see there is a boy in that series then don’t buy that series
Right, well it says nothing of a penis on the box, as mothers would certainly want to know before giving one to their child. So. Assuming you don’t have children? If you do....😳
Tara Reed I am not a mother I am a child
pls get off this comment section
But the figurines are basically babies/toddlers,
I don't think that's right...
wow there is no issue with being annatomicaly correct, still I find it more disturbing that babies dress in linergie etc
It has nothing to do with shame..
Do these people not understand the steps taken are to limit the chances of a child being victimized by a predator.
We’re also trying to keep our child’s innocence.. That works through multiple ways of properly raising a child.
I can’t stand shyt like this.. It’s hard enough keeping your children safe from predators. It’s like our society has been working against our best interests for decades now.
We’ve opened the borders to an unbelievable amount of predators that were not raised in our society. People that don’t hold our values or share our culture or history.
We have enough problems of our own to deal with.. Our children are number 1.
You're not keeping your childern safe if you don't let them know touching someone's private part is wrong, these dolls can be a way to teach kids to not let anyone touch them there.
@@DoIIyMama why does a childrens toy have to teach this.
@@toralthefurry3432 it's a helpful tool that can be used to show where its located, kinda what it looks like. its a very easy concept to grasp, yet I see u in every single comment in here lmao
@@sampound2163 its not a tool, ITS A TOY. AND ONCE AGAIN, children do not need to know this yet.
@@sampound2163 sure, teach them about their own parts, but they dont need to know about the other parts YET! they will learn it someday but JUST. NOT. AT THE MOMENT,
They blurred pics of a doll
Sooo.....what's the problem?
It’s just a doll
I don't like the fact they blurred it, like, I understand they have to but what if this is a made up story? At least this isn't as bad as the Poppy doll. Tch, what a shame this world is! Why would you put that on a doll for three year olds? I've also heard that the LOL dolls have came in inappropriate clothings, such as thongs and lingerie. Let's hope something happens to people like this, it's ridiculous. Smh. 🤦♂
My thing is on most girl dolls private parts there is something that resembles the shape of a female anatomy so why should it be different with male dolls. Also I searched it up and it’s not that bad at all it’s just a tiny nub on the bottom
@VR 0303 which are also tiny nubs lol
I don't know what dolls you have seen that have 'something' the resembles female anatomy. I am from America so that could explain the difference in our experiences, but all the dolls I have ever seen that were either intended to be female or not otherwise indicated to be male were flat and smooth with a featureless groin area. At most there may be a horizontal seam were the plastic was joined between the legs on cheaper dolls and some had a hole drilled in them directly between the legs if the doll was intended to wet/soil its diaper or use a toilet. Never was there anything that resembled female anatomy in any of these dolls. I owned several kinds of dolls growing up - all female or basically female as only clothes differated the sexes of doll in the 80s and 90s, when I owned dolls the most.
None of the dolls I grew up with or have seen since have had anything that resembled female or male anatomy without being clearly marked as being anatomically correct. Those that were intended to be realistic still lacked some key details as the one female baby doll fat rolls in her groin and no implied holes or actual holes. The male baby doll (baby alive boy doll) had a molded mound with a tiny stub on end barely stuck out in the same place any other doll would have been flat and had a much larger hole. Pressing a button on the doll's belly made any liquid inside the doll to come out his stub/penis. It was far less realistic than what the boy LOL dolls have.
I would think that having all dolls that wet just a hole and no molded parts is easier for emptying liquid form inside a doll and cheaper to make. I've noticed that anatomically correct male dolls go in and out of fashion. I did want one as a child for a novelty of it, but not all children want their toys to have that degree of realism. Over all I agree that if a doll is made for children and is anatomically correct in some form it should be made very clear so parents and children are not surprised by it after buying the toy.
@VR 0303 no shit sherlock
@VR 0303 someone's salty!
Mom: OMG THE BOY DOLL HAS PRIVATE PARTS EEEEEK
It's just a doll and it's not a real person! She should know that
01 tattoo is more concerning!
They need to be sued n cancel
After discovering this, I found my neice's LOL doll collection just, creepy.
And some of the girls (after you put them in cold water) reveil some, kinky shit that they are wearing.
Are the girl dolls anatomically correct?
only in american would this be an issue. overly sexualized and overly laden with false religion. next.
misanthropic not really
Thank you.
It's a body part. It's not inappropriate.
kids are too young to learn about these its disgusting.
It is on the packaging that it is anatomically correct doll so there's no need to complain.
Exactly! That mom needs to pay more attention
Bro my sister had a doll when she was little and it had a willy and my family found it really funny
I find it funny to this day
"What's a doll doing with a willy?" - my funny dad😂😂
They got to learn about genitalia one day, but what genitalia are for they can learn later on in life.
Lol surprise !!! Its a weener
The doll has tattoos on its face. Why you letting buying your child a mumble rapper doll.
😂😂💀
Isn't this a good thing? Kids should learn at a young age touching someone's private part is wrong and disgusting, so if someone does it to them, they aren't just confused, and actually tell someone they trust. With these dolls clothing, they are called Lil Outrageous Littles (L.O.L) so obviously they're going to wear outrageous and creative clothing. It would also be nice to let kids know someone's clothing isn't consent.
ok i agree with you but the thing is, these dolls arent teaching any of that. the dolls look like babies yet they are wearing slightly innapropriate clothes. if you want to teach your kids about this why not wait until they are ready or maybe not let a few strangers designing toys teach about they are ready?
@@toralthefurry3432 the clothes are inappropriate to you, they are outrageous and fun fashion for me, the kids, and Collectors.
@@DoIIyMama i do love the clothes but sometimes they make them a bit innapropriate.
@@toralthefurry3432 well thats the style these days. dunno what ur referring to, but showing ur stomach in a crop top shouldn't be labeled as "sexy" or "inappropriate". its perverts that sexualize ppl for wearing crop tops.
@@sampound2163 there are LOL dolls who actually wear alot worse outfits. im fine with that but not ok with the parts.
Wow, really? Go find something way more important to complain about.
*Important?*
These dolls can scare kids. Children are too young to learn about this stuff. The fact that they are doing this to these small dolls meant for kids is not only unneccesary, but its DISTURBING! These dolls can affect children's mental health.
@@toralthefurry3432 ...
@@toralthefurry3432 no, why tf would a penis on a doll affect a Childs mental health? its not even like a full penis, its 3 tiny little bits of plastic.
@@6433-w8t its true tho. just think about kids who had sexual trauma. kids should feel safe when playing with toys
@@sampound2163 yes. even if it is a few bits of plastic it still can make kids scared.
It’s kind of stupid so what it has a little pee pee. I feel like it’s good for kids to learn about the human body because the human body is only sexualized because people make it
The box told you exactly whatcwas inside. LOL, SURPRISE!🤣🤣🤣
I cannot with all these triggered soccer moms HAHAHAHA
children need to be taught about anatomy, but i wanna know why it’s just boy dolls
Ikr, and when I dipped one of my sisters dolls into cold water a BARCODE was on its back and another one had PIZZA those meanings are very disgusting
its not
@@amyah9832 how tf is pizza inappropriate for kids? It's a food. Plus, if it had some "secret meaning" kids wouldn't know anyway.
@@Zkankhunt pizza gate reference?? But yea in general kids won't understand it
They are trying to make kids “laugh out loud”
Now put them in water dirty too see how inappropriate clothes appear on their skin too looks disgusting i am angered! Very disturbing it is
It’s a bathing suit
@@alexisdoesstuff9091 with fishnet stockings!!! Thats not a bathing suite thats lingerie
Nicholas Delgado what’s wrong with fishnets?
@@alexisdoesstuff9091 what child have u saw wearing fishnet stockings name me 1 or how about the pizza tatto on the back 🤔
Wow an sientificly correct doll what is wrong with that
because kids are too young to see it
We NEED CHAD.THE CHAPSTIXXX
YES LMAO
I don’t mind the fact that they have private parts- I mean, we have them too 😑.
My problem is the way they’re dressing the dolls, which I’m pretty sure are meant to represent young kids.
My opinion is not always the same as others, but it had to be said.
Like how some of the babies are dressed in inappropriate lingerie when dipped in water with a certain temperature.
AND my daughter is 10 and she has the set even 8 year olds are old enough you just need to overlook the " mistake" there going to learn later in life of course.
@•Just Kam• I understand the concern, but when I was a child I had a friend with a baby boy doll that had normal private parts and no one ever saw it as sexual or weird, (they actually were common were I live, they try to make them realistic because they are normally for collectors)
@•Just Kam• well.
I guess all men need to cut there willy's off
me:wanting lol surprise dolls
mom:sees the hoys have a ding dong*meh it's just a toy *laughs at it*
Yeah now everyone put them in Ice cold water for a real surprise. You're welcome (no clothes)
Or hot water. I have a few that "transform" in hot water.
Your children are typically taught the difference between girls and boys and are taught why they are different and the reason they are taught is for their own safety, so i really don't get why people are freaking out, especially when the show and the dolls aren't for little kids, it is for preteens and such.
the dolls are for 5 year olds actually...
Uhh what? The toys are for little kids but I'm not sure about the show
We all love lols boys and girls who is with me
I am I love lol dolla
now that’s an *lol surprise*
0:33
That just look like XXXTENTACION without dreads ;-;
i have the doll im glad you pointed it out.... 😭
They can embrace me flipping them off and never supporting them. Can't blame parents. But why have they never complained about big boobed barbie. Yep, we're in a pick and choose world for sure
POEPLE GETTING TRIGGERED!!! Over dramatic parents getting angry , Lol 😂 literally.
how are parents dramatic over dolls that have inappropriate outfits and parts.
parents are trying to protect their kids from pedos.
I mean... I'm not a parent but I still kinda seem to side with them :/
Nobody had a barbie growing up then I guess
Ik
Wdym? Barbies don't have portruding phalluses and I'm a doll customiser!
Their upset cuz all boys have dat? Like if you don't wanna see that then just keep the clothes on
Many people here say its "nothing wrong with that". Well, what would they say then about next step: to make 'anatomically correct' GIRLS ?!!!!😨
Anatomically correct girl dolls aren't bad either, just make sure that the character isn't in sexualized clothing or whatever.
@@hubert1154 Just imagine that children have BOTH(!) anat. correct variants. Without sexual clothing...or without ANY clothing... Next step... (Children are very curious)
@@happysunshine1988 Technically, they could make their genital-less dolls do the deed already. Giving dolls anatomically correct parts is not inherently sexual nor will most children see it as such. Parents should be educating their children that boys and girls are different anatomically in the first place. Do you think it's going to destroy their innocence or something?
@@hubert1154 literally. why tf are ppl in the comments sexualizing children's toys
@@sampound2163 the dolls wear stripper outfits when you put them in water..
I think Rose just needed some attention🤷♂️
THIS IS RIDICULOUS! ITS A DOLL FOR GOODNESS SAKE!