The term Sunni Islam, pants beneath ankles | Shaykh Yasir Qadhi | Q&A Night Session 5
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 июл 2024
- On the fifth session of EPIC Masjid's Q&A night with Shaykh Yasir Qadhi, Shaykh Yasir Qadhi answers the following Questions:
1. Is using the term Sunni Islam divisive?
2. What is the Islamic ruling about lowering the pants beneath the ankles?
As a revert we are very lucky you are not shy to educate us on these sensitive matters. Before finding your talks I saw ur lectures no one wanted to discuss these matters so I had no clue what to think. Now I have a clue, jazak Allah kheir
As a revert it's a request not to listen to him ,he has been saying certain things which is contrary to Islam and imposing his western views on Quran. He is a deviant and will recommend you to listen to other authentic scholars like Muhammad Salah , Shaykh assim al hakim ,Abu Mussab etc. But not him,he has recently said deviant things about the concept of Gog and Mog .
S. Ahmad brother If you can not say something nice about another Muslim brother leg it to another channel 🙄
I know exactly what talk you are talking about. If you can not assume good about our brother i suggest you ask Allah ﷻto guide you to the correct way to go about things rather than rant on social media.
We do not always have to agree with something someone says, but do not tell me who i can and can not listen to. I’m in Australia so many issues of Fiqh have different rulings simply due to that alone. So thanks for your concern but i WILL be continuing to listen to this brother along with allllllllll the other “western” Sheikhs i listen to.
May Allah ﷻ forgive us all and guide us to what is best in this life and the Hereafter
@@saadahmadz Please don't be judgmental people are intellectual enough to decide who they will listen to. And to be honest this person presents first the Qur'an and authentic Hadiths and then presents "his opinion"... which is for me fair enough and a very sensible methodology, then I go on with my research on the matter. I don't idealize him as I don't idealize any other scholar. Jazakallahu khair
@@sarahjae8766 Totally agreed. Our sister in Islam, I really loved your answer. May Allah guide us all to the straight to the path. I.e the Quran and the Sunnah
@@saadahmadz Our brother in Islam. Our sister in Islam, Sarah Jae is absolutely right
Ma shaa Allah its an excellent explanation from Islamic schoolar.
Subbaha Allah well explain Sheikh Yasir Qadhi and Soo well to understand Alhamdulillah ♥️🤲
Love you dear Shaykh Yasir May Allah swt always increase you in knowledge and wisdom Ameen and reward you the best here and hereafter.Ameen
Excellent and common sense explanation on the term sunni.May Allah guide us on a balanced path and balanced thinking.Ameen.
Jazakallahu khair ..Excellent as usual
jazakallah brother yasir for very open minded answer those answer we need to listen with open heart n mind
May ALLAH swt bless you and your family and protect you IN SHAA ALLAH 🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊🕊
The q@a is highly educative. Jazakallah khair
Beautiful! Finally clarity on subject!
Very informative, hopefully the older generation can come to grips with it!
Well that's put a few things into perspective! Jazakallah khair
26:10 It really hits me when i reflect upon the current times of some zealous muslim brothers.
Thank you shaykh!! I just learned a lot from this video! May Allah reward you
Ameen ya raab
me. too
intriguing
Jazaakumllahu khayr
In another Hadith, one who has an atom of pride will be in fire.
Anybody runs this channel I'm asking forgiveness that I download your videos then upload on my facebook to share with people wether they watch or not .
But I later noticed that I did not even have no permission to download. Forgiveness please and allow me to share others with what I enjoy
Asalamu Aleykum, Where can I find the reference of Imam Abu Hanifa (r) garments below the ankle incident?
JazakalAllahu Khayran
ibn muflih in his book roughly translated as "the religious edicts" quote in the bottom
ابن مفلح في "الآداب الشرعية" (3/521)
" أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ ارْتَدَى بِرِدَاءٍ ثَمِينٍ وَكَانَ يَجُرُّهُ عَلَى الْأَرْضِ ، فَقِيلَ لَهُ : أَوَلَسْنَا نُهِينَا عَنْ هَذَا ؟ فَقَالَ : إنَّمَا ذَلِكَ لِذَوِي الْخُيَلَاءِ وَلَسْنَا مِنْهُمْ " انتهى .
Alhumduliah.
Sir
Would u please quote the reference of Hazrat Abdullah ibne Abbass nominating himself Ahle Sunnat Waljammat???
JazakAllah
14.00.. mohd ammar bin yasir? I learned that from life of sahaba siries by yasir qadhi said that adullah ibn abdullah ibn qabbab ra .. who was slid to his troat...? Which one sir?
JazakAllah o khair brother! I have a question that is it true, there will be going to happen a battle called " ghazwa e hind " in the end of times and I have heard from some pakistani scholars "ghazwa e hind" is also mentioned in hadith but I looked it up and didn't find any.
Here, YQ has talked about this issue. Please refer to this video.
I believe it's not sinful to wear it below the ankle BUT when it comes to performing my salaah I feel like if I don't fold it above my ankle then my salaah would be deficient. Probably because everyone folds it above when it comes to salaah but outside salaah we wear it below.
How to Send Questions????Any email id or something
Asc what is the email to ask questions. Fadhalan jaazakumal kheir
When there is a difference of opinion, Allah orders us to revert the matter back to Allah and Rasool. There is another explicit Hadith that there are three people Allah will not look at them on the day of standing and will have sever punishment and one of them is one who does Isbal. Also another Hadith about Umar when he was on his death bed and one young person came to visit him and while he was going back Umar looked at his izaar which was below the ankle and he ordered him to lift it up. We are not obliged to follow single Sahaba , Tabee and other scholars opinion as anyone can make a mistake whether it’s Imam Hanifa or Ibn Taymiah but we are obliged to look at the wordings of Rasool Allah which we are obliged to follow.
akhi if u listen to the talk again u'll see he addressed ur point,
he gave all these ahadeeth a context and made an asl out of it and interpreted all other ahadadeeth to that asl,
and it's not like 99% of scholarship didn't know of the ahadeeth u mentioned....they just didn't understand the same way u (and minority of scholars) do, and finally the ayah says ask those who know if u don't know
ورحم ألله امرا عرف قدر نفسه
Gold
Can we get references for these narrations about imams having low garments
Assalamu Alaikum. I'd like to ask some questions to Dr Yasir Qadhi, could you kindly tell me how could I do that??
Email him
Melih Dalboy, bro I emailed him about a question I had but I got no response. If you know an email address he has and that he will answer please share it
@@mrpresident1952 No im sorry, he probably gets lots of emails so he cant answer them all
Try tweeting or Facebooking him
MisterMR Pack that’s actually a good idea, thanks man
Correction Dr. Yasir, its not the son of Ammar bin Yasir, its the son of Khabab ibn Al'Arett
The winner in the end is the one that says I’m a Muslim and nothing more
AHLU JANNAH. IS. WHO. OBEY. ALLAH. AND. RASOOL. LULLAH. ( SAW )
BTW SUNNIS. IS. NOT. A. SECT. IT. MEANS. FOLLOWRS
OF. SUNNAH. OF. RASOOL. LULLAH. (SAW)♡♡♡♡♡♡
WE. CANT. CALL. PEOPLE. AND. SUNNAH. EXACT SAME. NAME
SUNNAH. IS . THE. LAW. OF. ISLAM. AND FOLLORWS. OF. THE. LAW OF. ISLAM. IS. SUNNIS . WHICH . MEANS. FLOWRS OF SUNNAH. SO. THERE. IS. NO. SECT CALLED. SUNNIS. EXCEPT. FOLLOWRS OF. SUNNAH. OF. RASOOL. LULLAH. (SAW) ♡♡♡♡♡♡
LIKE. KHULAFA U. RAASHIDEEN. RA. AND AHLUL. BAYT RA THEY. ALL. WERE. FOLLOWRS OF. RASOOL. LULLAH. (SAW ) HIS. SUNNAH. (SAW)
AS. MUSLIM. WE. CAN. TRY. BUT. WE. CANT. BE. EVEN. 1% OF . SAHAABA. ( RA ) WHAT. THEY DID. FOR. . ISLAM. AND. THE. WAY. THEY. SUFFER AND
THE WAY THEY. WORSHIP. ALLAH
NOON. CAN. DO. EVEN. 1%
BUT. STILL. WE. CAN. TRY. TO. BE . GOOD. MUSLIM
BEING. A . MUSLIM.
IS. TO. OBEY ♡♡
ALLAH.♡♡♡♡♡♡
AND TO. OBEY ♡♡
RASOOL LULLAH.♡ (SAW)♡♡♡♡♡♡♡
I am listening to you for at least 5 or 6 years in that time I have listened almost 70% of your lectures I have understand that you are from hanafi family and I have learnt from you that the belief of hanafi ISM is still inside you you claim you are not but knowingly or unknowingly it is still inside of you. Your iman should be Quran and Shahi hadees.
CORRECTION...It was Muhammad ibn Khabeeb Al Arraat (ra) whose son was killed by the Khwaarij and NOT Ammar bin Yasir (ra’s)
Al Haq.
So, from the first bit, we can infer than the Ahmadiyya 'muslim' sect is not one of the 73 groups but the Shia sect is. Is that right?
Not division. Differentiation.
Barracka Allahumu feek
I think When Shaykh Yasir Qadhi says were the real shia of Ali basically saying Shia are not shia of Ali. I think thats pretty uncalled for and has the potential to stir up hate amongst the laymans
Don't you think rejecting hadees and rejecting sunnat are two different things.
First u mentioned Khawarij rejected Sunnah then mentioned they rejected hadees.
Klass
27:45 what strand of Islam does Ibn Taymyyah belong to?
None. He followed his own madhab.
He is Sunni Imam
Brothers he was mujtehid mutlak(absolute).I'm just reading his book Al fatwa hamawiye.he is one of the greatest imams of ahlu sunneh wel xhemah.he was imam in fikf.usul fikh.hadith.tefaseer.lughah.in poetry..ilmul kelam.felsefe.and he know many doctrines.imam e dhahabi says I never ever seen anyone like him...
My English is not good beothers
@@SM-ku4hk nop he was hanbali in fiqh just like his grandfather and maybe his father but he was not mujtahid mutlaq dispite his intelligence and calibre
With all due respect, only Prophet (peace be upon him) will not be questioned on the Day of Judgement, Ayyub al-Sikhtiyani will also be accountable, perhaps. I am among the ones who struggle to wear pants above ankle, sometimes. May Allah grant us the strength and tawfiq.
Salam, please could i have the reference for the hadeeth in which prophet Mohammed(pbuh) said that groups like the Khawarij would come time and time again and when the dajjal comes they will fight on the side of the dajjall??
Kharijites.com
but. there. is. kharijis who. change. their. name. to. deceive. westren. to. play. victim. helpless. when. they. themselves
killing. innocent. kids
bcz. they. are. not. same. sects.
coward. will. use. tactic. and. cheating
and. will. always. play victam. cards to. get. westren. suport. help
( us usual. )
that. is why they. get. short. victory with. help . of. westren . power
otherwise. they. will
remain. ( what.?????)
lets. see. next. 10yrs
or . 2050. if. so. call
victry. will. remain. untill. this . time. 2050. ( NO. NEVER. ) the. victry. will. not. remaind (nonmuslim)
(INSHA ALLAH.)
THE. VICTRO. WILL. GO BACK. TO THE. REAL. OWNER. US USUAL. INSHA. ALLAH.
LAA. HAWLA. WALAA
QUWWATA. ILLAH. BILLAH.
THE. PURE. MUSLIMS. WHO. IS. SUFFERS. TODAYS. FITNAH. HUNGER. GOT. KILLED. GOT TORTURED. GOT RAPED. ITS. TEST OF. ALLAH. IMTIHAM
WE. HAVE. TO. REMEMBER. THIS.
IF. WE. ACCEPT. THE TEST. AND. DO. A SABAR AS. MUSLIM
WE. WILL. GET. REWARD FROM. ALLAH. WE. WILL. GET ( JANNAH )
( INSHA ALLAH. )
IF. WE. ARE. FAITHFULL. TO. ALLAH. TO. ASK. HELP. MADAD. ONLY. ALLAH. WHICH. WE. DO. AS PURE. MUSLIMS
( MASHA ALLAH )
ITS. WRITING IN
(QURAN)
OBEY. ALLAH. AND
OBEY. RASOOL
LULLAH. ( SAW )
WHO. EVER . OBEY
ALLAH. AND. HIS.
LAST. MESSENGER
NABI♡ MAHAMMED.
RASOOL. LULLAH.
(SAW) ♡♡♡♡♡♡
ARE. PURE MUSLIMS. AND. THEY. ARE . AHLUL (JANNAH ) ( INSHA ALLAH.)♡♡♡♡♡♡
ADEE. ULLAHA WA.
ADEE . URRASOOL.
(SAW) ♡♡♡♡♡♡
♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡
THIS♡ IS PURE♡♡
MUSLIMS♡ MASHA
ALLAH.♡♡♡♡♡♡
♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡♡
I don’t claim to be Sunni
Allah is my lord
Islam is my religion
Muslim are my people
Syahadat
Shalat
Zakat
Fasting
Hajj
~~~~~~~~~~~
Dare too adding 1 or more? + (non-isbal or 👖 upper ankles, for example)..??
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So thou can/must think..
والله أعلم...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
سلام عليكم
Greeting from Indonesia, brothers n sisters
i don't think anyone is proposing adding "non-isbal" to the the pillars of Islam, just like no one proposes adding not drinking, not eating pork, or not committing zina as one of the pillars of Islam ....u know
@@timmccoin7818 i hope so either..
Because, (i hope i'm wrong) some little out there get twisted about definition between murtad vs big sins, sunnah muakad x wajib, makruh x haram, they only divided straight two, if it's not halal so that's mean it's haram and if it's not kaffah so it is murtad... Ince again i hope I'm wrong..
والله أعلم
🍎💚LOVELY IMAM The HOLY KURAN SAYS "SHIA IBRAHIM PBUH " WHY THE TIME OF RASUL KARIM SAW THEY USE TO SAY SHIA ALI R.A. WHILE HE MUHAMADU S.A.W IS AMONG US .SHIA ALI STARTED SINCE Mustafa pbuh didn't die.
“Pants beneath ankles” these are the petty issue today’s Muslims concern themselves with
1. The point we are missing from the hadith of Abu Baker is that, Abu Baker himself is exerting effort to keep his cloth above the ankle. It is like the Prophet was saying to him, you are not of those who draw their garment out of pride because you are doing all you could to keep it up. Ibn Masood also did it to cover defects. What is our own excuse not to follow this hadith if not pride. The Sheikh would have make sense if his explanation is that if a condition beyond your control is forcing your garment below ankle, there is no sin on you. Looking at the various wordings of the hadith, it is clear that keeping the garment off the ankle is one of the features that should distinguish Muslims. We are not a moderate nation because we tone down our religion to suit circumstances, we are a moderate nation because we are proud of Allah's injunction and we show that Allah's injunctions is relevant to all time and place. No doubt, western thoughts, environment and culture do influence some scholars whether they know it, accept it or not. The statement that because there is scarcity of clothes during the time of the Prophet, hence it is more appropriate that the garment should not be below the ankles. This is the interpretation of the speaker, this explanation is not found in any of the wordings of the hadith. I advise people to not to accept anything because yasir Qadhi says it, we have more knowledgeable, reputable scholars, who are not affected by western thought that hold a contrary opinion. And the majority view in our time now among Muslim scholars including the speaker's teachers is that it is haram to draw garment below the ankle.
2. To the best of my understanding, I don't think any Muslim that understands the basic tenets of his faith will have a problem with the name Ahlus_Sunnah wa Jama'ah. But the name in question here is Sunni. Even though, the speaker may consider it to be the same, it is obvious that the term Sunni has some political connotations and I felt it is more associated with politics than it is with Aqeedah. I consider using the term Ahlus_Sunnah wa Jama'ah more appropriate because that is exactly the term we got from the Hadith and Ibn Abbas.
Allah knows best.
asalam alaikum brother. i would like to defend him on the point of the pants,he gave us examples of our own biggest scholars that we learn fiqh from the imams abuu hanifa shafi etc they were not westerners ts not that the western culture is influencing his answer rather he is also copyin en applying wat he jas learnt from those great scholars... but as he said if u do it as sunna gud for u but we shouldnt criminilise the others who dont do it if in their hurts its not out of pride otherwise if someone insists its a big sin he should begin with all those great imams who did it too. Allah knows best
@@ayubmusokile2650 didn't his teachers that taught him in madinah know that those scholars hold that view. Islam is not based on any opinion that a scholar hold or many scholars hold, Islam is based upon what is most correct even if it is only one scholar that hold the view. We do not found in any hadith or statement of the Sahaba where exception is given to anyone except in situations beyond control as in the case of Abu Baker and Ibn Mas'ood may Allah be please with them both. The only excuse the speaker gives implies that, that is not the way they dress in the west, it will look odd among the people. That to me is one of the manifestation of pride.
Even that excuse is based upon false assumption. There are thousands of our brothers with their garments above the ankles in the west, they look beautiful and appreciated.
When there is a disease in the hearts, that is when some aspects of the Deen look ugly. To raise the garment slightly over the angle look even much more better than drawing it down.
May Allah make us overcome our pride and let every aspect of the Deen welcoming in our hearts......... Aameen
Sometimes one has to listen to a lecture several times to comprehend it. Please do not be hasty.
@@olaniyimikaeelajibullah3965 Are you stating this as a scholar or an observation of yours.
@@arshad8455 take your time to keep listening. For us, we pray to Allah to keep us busy loving the Sunnah.
It is proven now, that Shia were existed before Sunni. Mufti Abu layth al Maliki said it. And many other sunni too. The point is Shia must be the small core circle of TRUE ISLAM. otherwise, follower of Ali does not mean anything while prophet PBUH was alive. What, you thing ALI was one ISLAM and MOHAMMAD another islam?! It cant be true !
Abu laith is a criminal that has been jailed for corruption.. So if your argument is based on anything he says, I feel sorry for you.
HASSANAN.......SADAQT.....
I ask which option is better? Which option is safer? It's clearly above the ankles. I ask, in the absence of a conclusive proof that is not haram, is there a chance that the minority are right and it is a major sin and it's haram? The answer is clearly yes, there is a chance.
And what is this attitude? Halal or haram, our attitude should be to be better muslims, vast majority of scholars says above the ankle is better, why our attitude is not wanting to follow and do the best of Quran and sunnah. Be smart, it's a big risk, for who does it and for whom says it's okay to do it. الله أعلم.
Its not that simple, especially when youre in a secular country, in a town full of immoral people, surrounded by those who call anyone who raises the garment and lets the beard grow a wahhabi, crazy and an extremist while you have no place to go. May Allah destroy the oppressors, may Allah guide and help those who are at risk of going to Jahannam because of things that are out of their control, and may Allah prolong my life so that I do not die in this state. Ameen.
What's he on about. Hand is (yed) and Arm is (Thira3). That's just a small thing from this video that is false. Listening further there are many things he has touched o that isn't facts. Beware people. Go read and don't just listen.
Al-Bukhaari reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whatever of the izaar (lower garment) is below the ankles is in the Fire." (al-Bukhaari, no. 5787)
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "There are three whom Allaah will not look at or praise on the Day of Judgement and theirs will be a painful punishment: the one who wears his garment below his ankles, the one who reminds others of his favours, and the one who sells his product by means of making false oaths" (reported by Muslim, no. 106)
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Isbaal (wearing ones garment below the ankles) may apply to the izaar (lower garment), the shirt or the turban. Whoever allows any part of these to trail on the ground out of arrogance, Allaah will not look at him on the Day of Judgement." (reported by Abu Dawud, no. 4085, and al-Nisaai, no. 5334, with a saheeh isnaad).
Ibn Abbaas reported that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah will not look at the one who wears his lower garment below his ankles." (Reported by al-Nisaai in al-Mujtabaa, Kitaab al-Zeenah, Baab Isbaal al-Izaar).
Hudhayfah said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) took hold of the muscle of my calf (or his calf) and said, This is where the izaar should stop; if you insist, it may be lower, but it should not reach the ankles." (Reported by al-Tirmidhi, who said this is a saheeh hasan hadeeth; see Sunan al-Tirmidhi, no. 1783)
All of the ahaadeeth quoted above speak against isbaal, whether or not the intention is to show off; but if a person does this deliberately out of arrogance, there is no doubt that his sin is greater. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Allaah will not look at the one who trails his izaar on the ground out of pride." (al-Bukhaari, no. 5788)
Jaabir ibn Sulaym said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to me: Beware of wearing ones lower garment below the ankles, because this is a kind of showing-off, and Allaah does not love showing-off." (Regarded as saheeh by al-Tirmidhi, no. 2722).
No one is able to be completely free of pride and arrogance, even if he claims that this is so. Such a claim is unacceptable, because by saying it, he is praising himself. Only in the case of those whom the wahy (revelation) testified that they were free of pride do we believe that this is the case. For example, there is a hadeeth which states that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him on the Day of Resurrection." Abu Bakr said to him, "O Messenger of Allaah, my izaar slips down if I do not pay attention to it." He said: "You are not one of those who do it out of pride." (Reported by al-Bukhaari, no. 5784)
What indicates that isbaal is prohibited even if it is not done out of pride is the hadeeth of Abu Saeed al-Khudri, may Allaah be pleased with him, who said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: The lower garment of the Muslim should come down to mid-calf, but there is nothing wrong if it is between that point and the ankles. Whatever is lower than the ankles is in the Fire. Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him." (Reported by Abu Dawud, no. 4093, with a saheeh isnaad.)
These ahaadeeth describe two different deeds, for which there will be two different punishments:
Imaam Ahmad reported that Abd al-Rahmaan ibn Yaqoob said: "I asked Abu Saeed: Did you hear anything from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) concerning the izaar (lower garment)? he said, Yes, listen! The izaar of the believer should come to mid-calf, although there is nothing wrong if it comes between there and the ankles, but whatever is lower than the ankles is in the Fire, and he said it three times."
Ibn Umar said: "I passed by the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and my izaar had slipped down. He said, O Abdullaah, pull up your izaar! so I pulled it up. He said, More! so I pulled it up more, and always made sure it was pulled up properly after that." Some people asked, "To where did you pull it up?" He said, "To mid-calf length." (Reported by Muslim, no. 2086; al-Dhahabi, Kitaab al-Kabaair, 131-132)
The issue of isbaal applies to women just as much as it applies to men. This is indicated by the hadeeth of Ibn Umar, may Allaah be pleased with him, who said: "The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: Whoever trails his garment on the ground out of pride, Allaah will not look at him. Umm Salamah said: O Messenger of Allaah, what should women do with their hems? He said, Let them go down a handspan. She asked, What if their feet show? He said, Let them lengthen it by a cubit, but no more." (al-Nisaa'i, Kitaab al-zeenah, Baab dhuyool al-nisaa).
The punishment for showing off may come to pass in this world, not in the Hereafter. Abu Hurayrah reported that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whilst a man was walking arrogantly admiring himself and his clothes, Allaah caused the earth to swallow him and he is suffering in it until the Day of Resurrection." (Reported by Muslim, no. 2088).
Please listen to the sheik again, your points have been addressed.
You become a non.thinking being when you belief that the book written by dessert dwellers 1400 years ago is 100 percent true and correct.
Lek Lek Tan how about the bible which even much older? and the torah? you are not a man of knowledge!
@@jeffa4822 Bible a d Torah are equally not 100 percent true.. as simple as that.
The Quran has scientific miracles in it that mankind didn’t know about until the 20th-21st century and it has remained unchanged for the entirety of its existence.
I don’t understand, if you don’t believe in Islam, why would you come and comment hurtful things about our religion? It’s one thing to not believe it, but to come and say mean things about our religion is not very nice.
@@mohamedseyni8748
Yes keep believing so. Keep believing in your supremacy. It is good for you
Respect brother but prophet did not approve us to carry any name sunni or any other. If he is alive now i am 100% confident that will be forbiden. All is wrong! Why and to whom we need to justify ourselfs and what we are folowing other then Allah on jugment day.So it doesnt make any sense to separate ourselfs from others and call sunni.Again Allah knows who is who and who follow what. Ok
So i follow sunnah but i am not accepting any name.
All this create hate among muslims . To emphasize of all of us just stay simple muslims world will be much better!!!
Nice to see him wearing a skullcap. Im guessing the mosque admin told him he needs to look like a Muslim if he wants to preach there. YQ previously said he doesnt want to wear the skullcap, but when it comes to money look how fast people are willing to change masha Allah
SubhaAllah maybe he could be losing hair, and he is afraid he will more if wears a cap, that why he avoids it. And now he is wearing it coz he came back from Hajj and doesn't have any hair to worry about. Always think best about your fellow muslims.
I don't think he is need of money to that point of desperation. He is a professor and a graduate from Yale; pretty sure he is making good money from his professional career already. Just guessing.
Astaghfirullah Brother. It's forbidden for us muslims from backbiting one another. We need to be mindful what we say and comment.
The skullcap isn't where your Islam resides. Stop being a backward Pakistani. The sheikh has done more for Islam than you have ever done. Secondly stop backbiting and thirdly always think good of others.
It's not fardh to cover your head. The prophet SAW lead a few salah without covering their own head. Indicating it is not fardh.
@@Qam001 covering your torso isnt fard either. No one said wearing a kufi is fard. But it is the way Muslim men identify as Muslims, so it is very important, and also Sunnah
He won't tell you that having the Azar below the ankles breaks the wudhu, even though it is in the Sahih Hadith. If 99.9% are going to hellfire, you want to join them, too? Whatever Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. did, we must try--to the best of our potential--to do the same. But, instead of following of the example of our Prophet S.A.W, you have decided to follow your scholars, your sheikhs, your sectarian Imams. That is not real Islam. Real Islam is following Qu'ran and Sunnah clearly. Sahih hadiths also say you must stand foot to foot and shoulder to shoulder in prayer. Do you do that? No, you guys just neglect it. Even the Imams who know they need to do it, proclaim it is "optional". It is sunnah, but you don't follow it. Sahih Hadiths also say you need do wudhu in one way, not in "many ways". But the majority are doing wudhu incorrectly. Sahih Hadiths also say prayer is only in one way, but you guys have decided that out of the four Imams, if you follow one of them, you're fine. That's not true. Prophet Muhammad S.A.W prayed only in one way. He did not come to confuse you with these kind of things. Prayer is the foundation of Islam. If you say there are four ways to pray, you are also saying that Islam is basically more than one. Sunni Islam, Shia Islam--there is no such thing. These are just made-up, sectarian names. You are saying Islam is more than in that regards, which is of course is not veracious. Islam is only one. There is only one, true way to pray. In any case, Sahih Hadiths also say you need to sight the moon, and then start the month of Ramadan, and sight the moon to mark the end of the month. But some follow it, others do not. Instead, they follow their local Masjids blindly. Or, they end up looking at Google Calendar. If the Sunnah says you need to sight the moon, you must. Allah created the moon for a reason. There are many, many hadiths, but sectarian groups deny some, while accepting others. What is this? You either accept all of it, or you don't. There is no in-between. If your Imam is leading the prayer, with his Azar below the ankles, is his namaz going to be accepted? I mean, the azar below the ankles breaks the wudhu, so what do you think? He is standing incorrectly, his hands placement is incorrect, the way he sits in the last rakaat is incorrect, his namaz is rushed (there is no harmony or sense of peace in the salaat). And you are praying behind him. There are many sunnahs you people don't follow, but this is the result of sectarianism--something which did not exist in Islam, and is thus, bidat, or shirk. Namaz is not valid without Surah Fatiha. When do you get time to do Surah Fatiha when you're praying behind an Imam? You cannot recite it while he is doing so, because Allah declares in the Qu'ran that when his words are being recited, we should not speak. You do not have enough time to do it beforehand, because you are reciting the duas beginning in the first rakaat of prayer. So when do you get time to do Surah Fatiha? It is in the Sahih Hadith that time should be given at the end of the Qu'ranic recitation, so that we can do Surah Fatiha. But none of your Imams do that, so tell me how your prayer is valid? You guys don't think about these kinds of things at all. This is the result of sectarianism. But these scholars do not want to talk about this subject at all. Sectarianism is punishment from Almighty Allah. That is in the Qu'ran. True Islam is only one, and true Islam has no sects. True Islam is following Qu'ran and Sunnah strictly. No rejection of any hadith when it comes to you. The Jamaat which existed at the time of Prophet Muhammad S.A.W, was Jamaat-ul-Muslimeen, and that is also in the Sahih Hadiths. I highly suggest to all of you, that you visit this site, and read its invitation. We invite all sectarian groups to come to Real Islam, because we do not associate ourselves with any sect of any kind, nor are we a sect, nor do we follow any Imam except for Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. This is the site: aljamaat.org/
Abdullah, please listen to the lecture a few more times and ask Allah to open your heart before your do that. And remember that reminders or listening a few times benefits a believer ( Innadhikra tanfaul mumineen ).
This is what's wrong with you sectarian groups of Islam. This is the problem. Don't you know that the Azar below the ankles breaks the wudhu? Nah, you're not going to mention that, are you? You mention something an Imam said. I don't care what the Imam said. It is in a clear hadith that Azar below the ankle breaks the wudhu. Is your Imam a Prophet that you should be following? Were you commanded to follow the four Imams? Nope. Were you commanded to call yourself Sunni or Shia? Nope. These are just made-up, sectarian names which has no place in True Islam. True Islam is simply following the Quran and Hadith. Following our only Imam--Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. You say some things, but you don't mention the other information to the public. That is very akin to what the Jews and Christians did. They covered up one part of their scriptures, and only read information which was handy to them. These so-called Scholars are doing the same today. You forget to mention the fact that Sectarianism is only a bidah, and thus, shirk. It is actually punishment from Allah to you sectarian groups. And that is in the Quran. You just justify "Sunni" and "Shia" Islam. What the heck is this? Islam is only one, and we should only be calling ourselves Muslims only. There's no such thing as Sunni or Shia Islam. It makes no sense. At the Prophet Muhammad S.A.W, there was no such thing. Everyone was in one Jammat, and that happened to be Jamaat-ul-Muslimeen. They didn't call themselves Sunni or Shia. You made these names up yourself. It is also in a Sahih hadith, that there will be people who will approach Prophet Muhammad S.A.W at the River of Kauthar. However, a barrier will be put between them and Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. Why? Because they came up with innovations in Islam. What you preach isn't real Islam. If you're preaching from Quran and Hadith, I've no objection to what you're saying. But, if you simply follow the four Imams, and take their word over the Prophet's, and don't even follow the basic Sunnah of keeping the Azar up, because it invalidates the wudhu, I don't know what you're preaching. Real Islam is simple, and Real Islam has no sects whatsoever. The true followers of Islam don't follow any sectarian Imams whatsoever. We respect them, but do not follow them, and even they were not in any sect. Imam Bukhari, Hanufa, Shafi, etc. They followed Quran and Hadith, as they were commanded to. Stop avoiding the main issue of this Ummah, and talk about sectarianism. --The real issue. You're going to evade it, because half of your viewers will probably abate. You're afraid no one will listen you, as no one listen to us, and what we preach. If you want Real Islam, I highly suggest you visit this site and read it's invitation. Aljamaat.org. This is not a sect. Why? Because the word jamaat-ul-muslimeen, is explicitly declared in various, Sahih hadiths. That is also in the invitation to all of you sectarian groups. In order to destroy sectarianism, you néed to relinquish your sectarian names, and follow only Quran and sunnah strictly.
I don't claim to be sunni
Allah is my lord
Islam is my religion
Muslim are my people