Thanks for clearing this up! I had trouble sussing out Benjamin's key premises here (I have difficulty reading), and as you pointed out in your explanation, it almost seemed like he was mourning the death of the aura when he meant the opposite. The text makes a LOT more sense to me now in light of this.
Thank you SO SO much for this. I had a hard time understanding the point of the text in relation to film and you made it so much easier. I had geniune confusion with the language but now I can finally smash that essay I've been putting off haha! 🙌
Very very comprehensive. Thank you so much for interpreting this heavy work for us!! John Berger's book Ways of Seeing and its televised adaptation (Episode 1) is an interesting illustration of Benjamin's ideas- one can also check that out.
Thanks for bringing in this perspective of Benjamin applauding the idea of mechanical reproduction of art. Initially when I read, I thought he was in favour of conserving art in its purist sense. Thank you for bringing out this essential perspective.
This is a very good video! The ideas are very interesting to discuss, and relate back to our current world problem of the commodification of art and the downplay of the craft, especially in regards to AI generated images
I appreciate your videos and I have been listening to the work you are doing in summarizing Baudrillard for my own research so thank you!... but I think that your take on Benjamin is missing his larger point in the power he saw in film as a vehicle for revolution (a new social function of art as the field of "play" that you noted) and his warning of how, conversely, film is being used to aestheticize politics & war by fascists and to manipulate and control the masses (by way of Mickey Mouse) by capitalists through the exploitation of our inescapable tendency towards cult value. For many reasons, the text remains highly relevant in our media based culture today and I pick up on new subtleties each time I read the text. Kudos for taking on such a rich topic that had withstood the test of time!
Really been enjoying your videos lately! Also, I feel like Benjamin, particularly this book, couldn't be more relevant than today, in the age of memes and videos…
@@TheoryPhilosophy No worries, I totally understand. I watched all of the commercials so that you can make some change. I struggle as a philosopher myself. In any case, thank you so much for the video. You did a fantastic job highlighting and explaining his main ideas. I'm going to sub.
It didn't really work out that art has become democratized, because the production of art is still by and large done by massive corporate conglomerates. This conception of art also muddies the waters between art and philosophy (which honestly I have no problem with, and would even promote myself to be honest) but today philosophy and art exist often on different realms from each other. Philosophy is by and large confined to academics, which sometimes bleeds into corporate policy or political party programs and the like, but it's not as if art and philosophy exist as a monolith and we have, due to reproduceability, a more democratic society where our creative and rational potential is expressed by and large. I think that terms like reactionary are unnecessary, because one might have a particular goal and then wish to work with the elements of reality and organize them in such a sense that they align with that goal. There is nothing reactionary about this. If there is, then one could say that anything which reacts to anything else is reactionary, and since we are always constantly interacting and affected by external objects then the term becomes ubiquitous and unhelpful.
Benjamin's egalitarian and optomistic take in this essay really makes his suicide even more tragic. He would be agast a how thoughly capitalism has subsumed art.
Thanks for clearing this up! I had trouble sussing out Benjamin's key premises here (I have difficulty reading), and as you pointed out in your explanation, it almost seemed like he was mourning the death of the aura when he meant the opposite. The text makes a LOT more sense to me now in light of this.
Thank you SO SO much for this. I had a hard time understanding the point of the text in relation to film and you made it so much easier. I had geniune confusion with the language but now I can finally smash that essay I've been putting off haha! 🙌
thank you for helping me understand the text. this was very helpful
Happy to hear it!
Really like your takes on these subjects. Subscribed.
Very very comprehensive. Thank you so much for interpreting this heavy work for us!! John Berger's book Ways of Seeing and its televised adaptation (Episode 1) is an interesting illustration of Benjamin's ideas- one can also check that out.
Thanks for bringing in this perspective of Benjamin applauding the idea of mechanical reproduction of art. Initially when I read, I thought he was in favour of conserving art in its purist sense. Thank you for bringing out this essential perspective.
Happy to hear it! And I definitely thought the same thing lol
Thank you so much for doing this podcast!
I have to write a 2000 word essay in 2 days and i think your channel might have just saved me
Eeeeek! Good luck
Quickly becoming one of my favorite channels
Thank you for a such a clear analysis! I'm looking forward to viewing more of your videos.
Just saved my life, thank you so much!
Happy to hear it :)
Lol, why is this video only available in 360 and 1080p?
Wonderful take, I am really thankful for your thoughts!
This is a very good video! The ideas are very interesting to discuss, and relate back to our current world problem of the commodification of art and the downplay of the craft, especially in regards to AI generated images
This really broke it down for me, thanks!
That slow zoom in is killing me
I appreciate your videos and I have been listening to the work you are doing in summarizing Baudrillard for my own research so thank you!... but I think that your take on Benjamin is missing his larger point in the power he saw in film as a vehicle for revolution (a new social function of art as the field of "play" that you noted) and his warning of how, conversely, film is being used to aestheticize politics & war by fascists and to manipulate and control the masses (by way of Mickey Mouse) by capitalists through the exploitation of our inescapable tendency towards cult value. For many reasons, the text remains highly relevant in our media based culture today and I pick up on new subtleties each time I read the text. Kudos for taking on such a rich topic that had withstood the test of time!
Really been enjoying your videos lately! Also, I feel like Benjamin, particularly this book, couldn't be more relevant than today, in the age of memes and videos…
This was super helpful, thank you so much!
Clear, insightful lecture thank you 🙏 and I agree the magic of the moon evades description👍
this was so so helpful and well explained tysm!
I have an exam on this tomorrow, thank you for explaining it so nicely!
Will you be doing any videos on Spinoza?
Thanks. I wasn’t sure if I was understanding the book correctly. 😵💫
Couldn't understand while bike riding. Had to do this reading for class.
thank you this was really helpful
Thank you so much. 500 times more helpful than my professor...
Thank you but pls take it easy on the commercials (20!!!) thanks to RUclips
I know :/ it's my way to earn a little money to keep this going. If you find the podcast version, there are no ads.
@@TheoryPhilosophy No worries, I totally understand. I watched all of the commercials so that you can make some change. I struggle as a philosopher myself. In any case, thank you so much for the video. You did a fantastic job highlighting and explaining his main ideas. I'm going to sub.
@@roonieh9619 oh no! I make my few pennies whether you watch the commercials or not so skip if you can :)
THANK YOU!
Thanks a lot! 🙏🙏
You posted this awhile ago, but I was wondering: acccording to you does benjamin consider the shift to exhibition value as a good thing or not?
Thanks so much!
:)
can someone explain to me the beginning song? is it a larger comment about this piece lol
شكرا لكم plz I want to know what the substantive duration and phisical existance and
It didn't really work out that art has become democratized, because the production of art is still by and large done by massive corporate conglomerates. This conception of art also muddies the waters between art and philosophy (which honestly I have no problem with, and would even promote myself to be honest) but today philosophy and art exist often on different realms from each other.
Philosophy is by and large confined to academics, which sometimes bleeds into corporate policy or political party programs and the like, but it's not as if art and philosophy exist as a monolith and we have, due to reproduceability, a more democratic society where our creative and rational potential is expressed by and large.
I think that terms like reactionary are unnecessary, because one might have a particular goal and then wish to work with the elements of reality and organize them in such a sense that they align with that goal. There is nothing reactionary about this. If there is, then one could say that anything which reacts to anything else is reactionary, and since we are always constantly interacting and affected by external objects then the term becomes ubiquitous and unhelpful.
Benjamin's egalitarian and optomistic take in this essay really makes his suicide even more tragic. He would be agast a how thoughly capitalism has subsumed art.
Hello fellow Photographers 👋
Feel free to check out my chapter in " Dracula and Philosophy," published by Open Court, edited by Nicolas Michaud.
love my two favorite things coming together- marxism and films :)
What exactly is dadaism?
Thank you
You're welcome
thnx v much
You're welcome 🙂
Thank you!
its benjamin! not benamean... it's just hard to listen to with all the mispronunciations ...
Uhmmmm he's German
J in German language not the same as in English.
It is not a wrong pronounciation