Length Contraction | Physics with Professor Matt Anderson | M29-01
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 мар 2022
- When objects are moving fast relative to an observer, their length decreases. Say what? Yep, this is one of the implications of relativity.
Physics with Professor Matt Anderson
Really liked this one. Does this mean I'm less fat when driving in mt car? :)
If a spaceship is travelling from earth to a star at some relativistic velocity, how would a person on earth express the velocity of the spaceship. Is it the proper length over the time of the earth observer or the dilated time of the spaceship?
time dilation will also make the atoms *jiggle* less ... leading to a *foreshortening* induced by *volumetric* contraction, adding to the length contraction effect ... n'est-ce pas?
How does tihs Board work?, are you writing inverted or is it some kind of mirror thingy?
Watch the video of Optic part, he explained it in video.
Really need the last chapters for quantum mechanics. Such as wave function, Schrödinger equation etc. Having examination about 1 week. Need good summary. Thanks.
Wish I had those done already. Alas, they are on a long to do list.
Cheers,
Dr. A
@@yoprofmatt Do you actually believe this nonsense? You seemed reasonably intelligent. Shame that you accept garbage on the basis that its "good science" if a famous person says it. But I bet you are unwilling to discuss it openly.
What is Bpl and Epl? I don't understand about this .
And then....take the box and rotate it (axis in/out of the plane of the screen) while it's moving forward by that velocity v. 😉
I lost my telephone
You are CREATING an absolute frame for a velocity by CHANGING your numbers with a number between 0 and 1 (transforms). No velocity has any real definition at all, ever. Each one is INFINITELY relative, so acting like any velocity does ANYTHING in physics is a joke. There is NO MECHANISM to your theory. Dimensions don't exist, show me dimension 1 or 2 without math. Send a pendulum into space and tell me how time is relative. Just the concept of light speed being constant to EACH observer is goofy, because that would mean that the Universe somehow knows if you change your infinitely relative speed. It should not be so easily accepted, but math is a procedural path into physics, so rote memory fools can thrive. This all means that there is CERTAINLY a NON-transformed reality left behind all this time that works just fine without your analogous transformed numbers painted over it. Math can lie to you. Look at my causal explanation for the gyroscopic effect. Angular momentum was taught to everyone, but this completely misses the true cause. ruclips.net/video/Sip_9ew2RjA/видео.html