Do you understand why they named MUSE based on all English words when they have their own glorious proprietary language to play with? Why shy away from awesome Japanese?
@@nthgth Exactly the same reason you just gave, but reversed. English is cool to them. Also Japanese doesn't use an alphabet and as such makes acronyms a bit difficult.
As always, a ludicrously excellent set of vids ! I ended up thinking to myself, how would that Save The Watch Tower scene be like side by side with Normal LaserDisc and a DVD ....
Something a lot of people do not consider, is pixel density of the device you play it on plays a huge part in how good a video looks. 480p on a 480p screen looks great. It looks like blurry garbage however on a 1080p monitor.
A reason for that is that almot all media had bad quality, air signal channels, VHS even some consoles had less ress than real 480p until N64 and dreamcast came out and some used 480i, so when DVD came out they gave you the "real" 480p experience
5:00 "A touch oversaturated" I would rather have oversaturated than undersaturated. The regular Laserdisc looks like RAW files that haven't gone through color correction.
@DoctorWeeTodd Well he did say it was an older Back to the Future LD from like 86 or something but Yeah the MUSE/Hi-Vision Color Pops On!?!or Off!?! The Screen! Also Crisper, Smoother and Cleaner Picture if a bit “OverSaturated”. Would Prefer to Look at that! For 93/94 that is Quite an Achievement and Almost 1080i!
Thanks for persisting down the rabbit hole that was laserdisc. Don't worry, we'll invent more rabbit holes for you to spelunk. 8k blu-ray discs, anyone?
@@fluxoff Hello, I've read that four-k has higher 'relative to distance' resolution that Conde-Naste magazines; would you agree that it's a relevant comparison?
I remember watching a laserdisc movie in 1996 on a regular crt tv , I remember I was blown away by the quality , It was fascinating seeing that at the time
in 1995 a bar had a laserdisc jukebox..... amazing.... you could watch the video on several screen in the bar and the audio through the speakers while drinking a beer or eating a sandwich ))))
It's great for the time but nowhere near bluray/digital 1080p+. Let alone 4k lol. Its essentially analogue 480p, doubled as far as resolution and more important motion resolution. For certain things on a CRT its good, even a high quality consumer CRT would look good, the CRT motion res and black levels making up for many of the faults. But 1080i-ish is very different overall. Analogue is also, outside of film... Well a whole extra discussion or point lol. But yeah on a phone screen it looks decent for the time but its analogue 1080i no matter how ya slice it. Blow it up on a later CRT that many homes had, with component possibly, the Enhanced Def sets and it would lose much of that comparable quality to even 1080p. Especially digital, it would be no contest.
1) There are loads of links in the video description text box 2) Please don't get hung up over the machine breaking at the end - I only mentioned this to explain why there weren't more tests. For example one thing I'd have liked to compare against the Hi-Vision disc would be my Squeeze (Anamorphic) laserdisc of Cliffhanger because Squeeze was the best that a standard LD could look. If I'd managed to get all my tests done before it broke down, I'd never have needed to mention its demise..that's all just behind the scenes stuff. Quite often these old things I demo only work for a short period of time - just long enough to make the video about them. I will be getting my repair chap to take another look at the machine in a few weeks and *if* he can get it working again, I may return to do more tests and demos in a future video - but don't hold your breath on that - there's a heck of a lot of stuff in that machine that could fail and not all spare parts will be available after all this time.. However rather than concentrating on the negatives - focus on the positives. We got to see these Japan-only HD Videodiscs from almost 25 years ago in action. That's what I take away from this whole experience. A couple of weeks ago this was something I'd never seen working, but now I have and that experience can't be taken away.
Techmoan I wonder if the caps are having issue, if indeed the power supply is the issue on the second go around or perhaps the motor grease has stiffened over time.
The technically minded are concerned about machines in the same way classical surgeons were concerned about the body. If it's unfixable, perhaps you can track someone down in the UK who does in depth electronics teardowns, eg Big Clive or Mikeselectricstuff, you might get an interesting collab out of it too. At the very least our mechanical bloodlust would be sated :^)
It's such a shame it broke down on you. Luckily you were able to create this wonderful video for us all to enjoy. It would have been nice if you would have been able to use it for yourself afterwards, but as you say, it is what it is. I agree with you with the complicated 90's part. I remember fixing my TV, putting it all together only to open it up again a few weeks later to fix something else. There is just so much electronics in there that it's a miracle it even worked too begin with. I really enjoyed watching this 2 parter, thank you.
Whilst from the beginning of this series it was difficult to imagine this tech really being useful against modern tech, videos like will go on to be useful from a historical point of view. It’s likely that in another 25-30 years it will be even more difficult to find examples, so good documentation like this might the last actually created.
I'd love to see a part 3 for this! The thing about ludicrously expensive ideas like this is that unless someone has the means, nobody will get to enjoy how ludicrous it is. You already have the MUSE equipment, you have someone who can do repairs nearby, and you're probably it's foremost expert now. Plus im sure we all want to hear your opinion about the practical watchability of these discs.
I'm surprised at how good the quality is of Hi-Vision vs the standard Laserdisc. You can actually read the text in the background and make out the registration on the car that almost runs Marty over. Of course, Blu-Ray is in FullHD then but Hi-Vision looks like 720p in comparison, minus the blurry background. I'd be curious to see more footage comparison versus VHS or even S-VHS.
It looks like 720p but it's actually technically closer to 1080i in resolution (interlaced 1035 visible lines). I bet if we had this going on for longer, it could actually get closer to the sharpness we have in current full HD (native, not oversampled from 4K, that is not fair). Also there's the multiple interlacing system that made it blurier, I would guess it's amazingly sharp at stills. Not to mention BD capture through HDMI or straight rip vs analog HD capture is quite a difference too, even for Component video it's on it's edge.
It's a different story from the "post-war days" to the "modern days" up until the 80s japanese tools, hardware, electronics, cars etc were cheap products it was only later when they had fully recovered from the war that their quality in products returned. If you ask the old folks or boomers they can tell you.
I didn't really encounter HD video properly until the late 2000's. It's incredible to me that home video of this quality was available to the public (albeit only the public with money to burn) all the way back in 1993!
Lots of thanks for uploading this! I've always been fascinated by MUSE LDs but online video samples of them are almost nonexistent. This helps tremendously to show off the quality a MUSE system could produce. An interesting yet tremendously niche technology that we can finally see in action. Thanks again!
MUSE LD was an even more expensive form of a technology that didn't take off because it was too expensive for the mass market, so... no, it's not amazing at all that it didn't take off :)
Although I never owned a LD player, it still amazes me how enjoyable the disc format technology can be. To this very day I still own lots of series on standard definition DVD and the quality is still very much appreciated. With the latest trend of streaming, I have found that the "magic" is gone of yesteryears solid engineering.
I'm really blown away by how good the HiVision looked. I had no idea that level of picture quality was possible anywhere close to that timeframe. Thanks for putting out yet another wonderfully interesting and informative video!
I'm glad you got this to work, if only for a brief period of time. I'm sure a home cinema set up with Hi-vision laserdisc and four-channel audio would've blown people's minds back then. Makes me think about how even 4K HDR isn't really that expensive anymore nowadays.
I could listen to you explain things for hours. Have you considered doing a podcast? I'm sorry people were so rude yesterday about having to split the video into two parts. Split your videos into as many as you want, i'll still be watching them all! Thanks for the great entertainment!
Thank you for the lengths you go to bring us such fascinating and informative videos! And for preserving and documenting technology from the past for the future :) You're awesome!
Thank you for your dedication in bringing us the best of old tech. I really appreciate all the work you put into your videos. Always look forward to everything you do. I'm an electronics major, class of '88. This stuff brings back a lot of old memories.
The reason why the picture appears washed out is because you dont have the d-ext mode enabled. What this does is it sets the proper ire level for ntsc and ntsc-j discs. So if you are watching an ntsc disc on this japanese player, it will look washed out because it defaults to the japanese black levels. This is only corrected by enabling the d-ext feature. The problem with the x9 is that you need the remote to access it as it does not have a button for it on the chassis. Your problem is you have the wrong remote! The remote you have is a CU-CLD108 which was designed for the Pioneer CLD-HF9G. The correct remote for this machine is a CU-HLD003 which has the hi-vision logo in the top right hand corner, whereas the remote you currently have only says laserdisc. They are the same design though, however unless im extremely mistaken, the HF9G does not have this feautre on the remote, therefore you would be unable to access it and take true advantage of this machine. Having said all that, most modern tvs have built in black correction so it wouldnt be too big a deal to get the tv properly calibrated for ntsc discs. But I suppose it doesnt matter now considering the machine stopped working. Hopefully you can get it repaired as it is a beauty!
Bravo! You've really raised your already high bar with this series, TM. Absolutely brilliant in every way. I'm awestruck by your ability to dredge up all manner of obscure tech relics and turn them into hugely compelling, professionally produced and presented YT content. Hard to believe you (may) also hold down a day job.
One note: the washed out colors of the standard Laserdisc might be because of the S-Video electronics and not the disc itself. I've seen color problems of this nature in S-Video electronics before. Back before digital and component, I had a couple devices where composite gave a better picture than S-Video just because of poor S-Video electronics.
I have a Denon player connected to a cheap composite or svideo to HDMI converter. The stream on the laserdisc is composite and the s-video converter in my player is best avoided. It may be that even though the hi vision player has a good comb filter that it is still not the way to go. In the end it is adding another layer of video processing when a capture device is in play.
Wider color gamut of older NTSC needs to be converted by color management for display on a narrow gamut HDTV set (rec.709/sRGB). Japan used NTSC (1953) gamut until 2011 (IIRC). This is why screen captures of old anime titles on websites always look pale: they need to be converted through the correct color profile to match gamut with the monitor. The standard NTSC Laserdisc would no doubt look colorful and rich on a matching CRT display from that era. In basic terms, the primary colors (phosphers) used and the contrast/levels curves of the video and the display need to be matched (or the signal corrected to match the display). The difference in color and contrast for MUSE and standard in this demonstration might be caused by this issue.
If the problem is standards related, it cannot be fixed with contrast and color adjustments. The signal needs to be remapped to a different standard. Color/contrast makes a superficial improvement but does not correct the underlying problem. Increasing contrast will destroy image information by clipping dark colors to black and light colours to white, so the picture loses detail. Increasing color does not change the colors of the primaries to a different set of red/blue/greens. It will make colors more intense, but they will still be the wrong colors.
@@CL-ik1kh I read it somewhere years ago but did not keep a link. I am aware of the contradiction, but considered the source as correct because screen captures from DVDs achieve the expected color and levels when an NTSC(1953) ICC profile is attached to them. Perhaps it is mistaken, and the color correction seems to work for some other reason (by coincidence). Just checking Wikipedia article on topic comes up with "Japanese NTSC never changed primaries and whitepoint to SMPTE "C", continuing to use the 1953 NTSC primaries and whitepoint." However, it might pay to source the paper cited to be sure the summary is not ambiguous within the context of the article. I should stress I am not an expert in this field, I am a hobbyist (former biologist, not TV engineer) who's put some effort into trying to understand color management, etc, and could well be mistaken.
@@CL-ik1kh I figure there is no harm done attaching ICC profiles to screen captures: looks better, original data remains unchanged, decision can be easily reversed. But contradictory sources are frustrating. Unless they are sort of both correct at the same time (hybrid practice). Perhaps Japan started using SMPTE-C with a different black level, but kept the physical displays on NTSC(1953), then mastered the SMPTE-C content with color and levels adjusted to work on that hardware?
What a rollercoaster, thank you for going through all of this to bring us as much as you have. I'm still amazed that the modern TV was able to show the HD signal from the decoder, but I suppose it is analogue.
Watched this again as it was so good. Did your guy ever manage to get it working again? Appreciate what you say about the transfer from 25 years ago not being as good as the 2010 one on the bluray - one can only wonder how the LD MUSE technology would look with the latest transfer as its source. All very fascinating stuff to a films on disc enthusiast like myself. 👍
MUSE sounds like an analog version of MPEG, because MPEG uses the same psychological principles to encode motion. MPEG uses key frames and motion vectors in the digital domain, where MUSE does the same in the analog domain.
Stoney3K I don't think it works in the way that MPEG uses macroblocks, though? It looks pretty much like the MUSE system pretty much just spins the disk faster, so four (interlaced) fields get spat out in the same time as a normal two-field frame would, which gives them the higher resolution. (higher overall bandwidth, greater number of lines.) I haven't read up on the rest yet, but I suspect the decoder then stores the previous fields in a framebuffer, so it can do it's combining algo, and also figure out the motion based on the previous fields. I've always wanted to capture a MUSE RF signal, to try to decode it in software. There is a project happening atm which captures the raw RF signal from a Laserdisc player, and was originally meant for getting faithful captures of the BBC "Domesday" disks from the 80s. The same ADC board might just be fast enough to capture the raw MUSE signal, though. It might even be possible to decode a Hi-Vision disk on a standard Laserdisc player, assuming it could be forced to spin up the disk. (Probably wouldn't work at all, though, due to the use of the red laser on the Hi-Vision players.) Wish I had a Hi-Vision disk and a cheap LD player to mess with. I would even attempt to build a laser sled for reading it (with a DVD red laser pickup), but it's probably not worth all of that effort. lol
That's what I thought at first but apparently MUSE is mostly digital. The first thing the decoder does is pass the signal through an analog to digital converter, then do all the processing. I was quite disappointed when I first found out, heh. There's a diagram of the decoder here www.avsforum.com/forum/114-hdtv-software-media-discussion/980435-things-make-you-go-hmmm-laserdisc-versus-hdm-8.html#post12955801
@@Dani128 If it was mostly digital then it's shame they did not go all the way do digital disc. Looks like a half-one design, or maybe a consequence of maintaining LD reading.
I miss old times, VHS, DVD movies....It was special to go and rent a movie then watch it..now when everything is available it does not have value. I don't even watch movies anymore. At first I was astonished, woow I can download whatever I want but later I was like...drowning in the sea of everything so I just skydive today and ride.
I have to agree. I watch very few films. I watch more TV series boxsets than anything. I think the saturation of the modern market has killed the enjoyment of it.
It had a certain charm, but I don't feel the same way. I still have to put time aside to watch something, so the thought of picking something out still goes into what I watch for the night. I really don't miss going to Blockbuster to rent a movie I really wanted to see only to find out they are out of copies. Then you either rent something else, sit and wait and hope someone returns it, or go home empty handed.
Besides being able to play hi-vision, the X9 is probably the best laserdisc player in the world in terms of playback quality. Best SNR, lowest crosstalk, and best comb filters of any player. I'd say it would be worth fixing it.
I’ve seen other videos where the only issue with a laserdisc player is dried/old lubricant on the pickup mechanism or the same or a belt with the tray mechanism.
According to tests (video essentials laserdisc) done by members of originaltrilogy.com, the Pioneer HLD-X0 has the best picture quality of any laserdisc player. But the X9 appears to be a very similar build (both were sold only in Japan) and should be almost as good. Definitely worth fixing.
Knightmessenger the X0 has even better build quality (the thing weighs 80 pounds!). You can barely hear the disc spinning with all the layers of metal shielding it has. Everything about it softly speaks to no-compromise design. It’s slightly older than the X9, so it doesn’t have as advanced of a comb filter, but arguably looks smoother and less digitally processed. I really wish mine worked... it was half destroyed when I got it, but I got it working for a while. Even in rough condition, it far surpassed every other player I’ve seen (far too many to be considered “healthy”)
Thank you for all these great videos I love showing my kids old tech. My 14 year old wants to go to college in recording and audio so all this stuff is gold . I've owned a few things you have posted it's really cool seeing that stuff again.
You're basically hearing the vertical sync pulse occurring 50/60 times a second (so roughly 50/60 Hz square tone with extra harmonics). You aren't hearing much of the actual signal itself (since it'll be 16 MHz and way beyond any sound card recording, let alone hearing.)
I've always been curious about this format, I could have sworn that I read somewhere awhile back about a bootleg market for HD laser discs in China, but could be wrong. I have to say that the format actually holds up fairly well against Blu-Ray, especially when you consider how old the tech is.
Thank you for the immense amount of effort you put into making these videos Mat! Even though they obviously don't get tons of views, all of us that do watch them really love them. They're the best of their kind on RUclips, as far as I'm concerned. Cheers!
2 related items. In the late 1960's, the Smithsonian Institution (where my father worked at the time) had a 6 month (I believe) exhibit sponsored in part by AMPX which featured a large screen demonstration of what HD TV could look like in the future. If I remember right, the screen was a 16x9 CRT about 3 or 3 1/2 feet across. The exhibit also included the latest AMPEX, 3 inch video tape machine. Also, on its original crane dolly, one of the only 3 original Technicolor 70mm movie cameras. The exhibit was designed to demonstrate the highest levels of past and future qualities in media. Between 1992 and 1993, I volunteered at the US National Park Service's Harpers Ferry Center, where many of the museums, brochures, books and films the public sees in the various parks are developed. For a few years in the early 1990's, some of the larger parks were using Hi-Vision Laserdisc, via upscale line doubling (or in a few cases quadrupling) to project their films in the park's visitor centers. Yellowstone, Yosemite, Grand Canyon, and a few others had these systems until they were eventually switched to Blue-Ray. I think they are now using computer versions.
Blown away by hivision. Compared to bluray it really isn't that much worse. Off Course you could say there is a huge difference, but what would happen if you would play this for your friends. Would they notice it? I bet rich people with their own theater rooms had this way back. Am I the only one who wants to see back to the future now?
I think the muse format really could hold up to a blu ray. The issue is the transfers of the past are just complete garbage compared to what we have now.
Not really. Especially when most of my comments are way after the video went live. Most of the super upvoted ones were made right when the video went live before all the viewers showed up :P
In 1993, I was more concerned with trying to get Hi-Fi (High-Fidelity), stereo SOUND for a "home-theater" experience from a "4-head Hi-Fi VCR"-didn't know what a *pixel* even was!
One important thing to remember is that whilst the MUSE system died quickly, the underlying1125/60 HiVision video standard is an incredibly close relative to the current HD standards we use around the world. 1125/60 may not sound like 1080/59.94i or 1080/50i - but both 1080/60i and 1080/50i are based on 1125 total lines (with 1080 active lines, compared to the 1035-1050 active lines that HiVision used originally). The standard was tweaked slightly to allow for a nice square pixel resolution and almost-nice MPEG2 multiple. We don't call our current systems 1125/50 or 1125/59.94 - but that's what they are :) All the broadcast kit designed for 1125/60i HiVision was relatively easy to modify or convert for the new, nearly identical, now-called 1080/59.94i format used for production for digital MPEG2 distribution. That's why 1080i had such a head start over 720p in the US (where 720p was a brand-new format, 1080i was based on one that had literally been in use for decades). (One subtle difference is that HiVision in the 90s was 60.00Hz based and didn't use the 59.94Hz refresh rate of NTSC that current 1080i standards do in '60Hz' territories. Conversion between 1125/60i and 525/59.94i meant some quite complex processing was needed to hide the dropped frames on cuts where possible etc.) The BBC shot a drama on the HiVision baseband format in association with NHK. 'The Ginger Tree', which was broadcast in 1989. This was shot 1125/60i - using a largely BBC camera crew I believe - and edited using 1" open-reel DIGITAL (Yep!) VTRs at BBC Television Centre. Unfortunately there was no direct 1125/60i to 625/50i converter available at the time - so the BBC domestic broadcast went via 525/60i I believe (hopefully not via NTSC composite...)
Iam giving this a 👍👍👍 just for the amount of time and effort and cash went in to making this, for me to chill out while nursing the biggest hangover ever!
Thank you for your work on this. There are too many obscure pieces of tech or individual near-mythical units out there that will sit unsold forever on eBay at insane prices, or be speculated about endlessly on message boards. It was a real treat to see the video comparisons for BttF. I appreciate your point about the improvements in film-scanning technologies. If it had an input it would be fascinating to see test signals/patterns or footage to find out the true limits of the encoding. But, of course, we have all seen the shortcomings of "born-digital" over-the-air HDTV with low bitrates compared to the 35+ MBps available to commercial Blu-rays. Consider what I wrote above a general note of appreciation for your work. I only found your channel a month or two ago and I have fallen down the rabbit hole. Great research, editing and video quality make each one damn near definitive.
One of the odder things I've read about is the "Hi-Vision" PC Engine successor which was only demonstrated back in 1993(4?). A multi-player bomberman was the highlight, demonstrated on some tradeshow. They cut the amount of hardware before releasing, turning it into a real turkey of a system that nobody bought - basically just a CD-ROM, jpeg-decoder and a powerful blitter. The problem was that the system was supposed to have several blitters. So in the end it was suitable only for terrible FMV games, and it was crushed by the competiton. Edit: Shown in 1993 as HI-Ten Bomberman. This lead to project tetsuin which ended up as PC-FX.
My advice to you: Cut loss, sell the machine back to Japan, even a broken one they are welcome because I'm sure many parts inside this machine still works. Sell those hi-vision discs on ebay, that's it.
I wonder what the picture would have looked like if they had invented the HDMI interface back then. Fascinating to see how many ideas about the future were out there at that time. Cheers.
There isn't much of a difference in the image quality of a 1080i signal over component or HDMI if you're comparing using the same source and have good DACs for the component signal. That said, HDMI usually comes out ahead because a lot of devices with component output don't have particularly good DACs, and you can do 1080p over HDMI, while component is limited to 1080i (as far as the CEA 770.3-D-2008 standard goes).
This two-part video series on the Hi-Vision LD series was absolutely fascinating to me. To think that what we perceive as contemporary tech in the US, and other countries when it comes to HD was already in full swing in Japan when I was just 11 years old in 1991! I've always been marveled by Japanese ingenuity by their creative capabilities and this Hi-Vision format just continues to validate how deft Japanese engineering is with everything ahead of its time; hell, they're now broadcasting 8K video signals in their country! I look forward to more of your insightful videos Techmoan as they've both educated and excited me in discovering all this phenomenal tech that existed back when I was a kid and as an adult like HD VHS! You have to love Sony as they pride themselves in being the pioneers with a repertoire of both successful and defunct tech like the Minidisc format. I still have my Minidisc player in my 2000 Honda Civic; it still works and I love using it!
I’d be willing to bet it just needs to be recapped. The capacitors in the replacement PSU were just as old, the only reason they lasted any longer at all was because they hadn’t yet been used. (The aging is largely independent of use.) If i were nearby I’d offer to do it. The other thing that’s possible is that the laser has weakened, in which case there’s a trim pot in there somewhere. But I wouldn’t touch that until ruling out capacitor failure by full recapping.
Your videos are brilliant. I've been binge-watching them over the last couple of weeks and feel I've learned a lot. Your enthusiasm's great too; you're one of the good guys in life, Mr. Techmoan.
What a shame it broke. Maybe the weight of the CRT bent the frame and caused a short in one of those many circuit boards? Hopefully these videos will make enough to afford repairs, cheers!
Steve Martino not really; the machine he used was last manufactured in 2002, which was right smack in the middle of the global Capacitor Plague of the early 2000s. More than likely, the capacitors went bad like a worn out timing belt snapping on a twin cam engine; both instances results in an expensive paperweight.
@ digitalrailroader that's what i was thinking, i don't think it would cost much to have the player recaped and the boards clean of the spilled electrolytic
SilverX95 but you saw how tightly packaged all of the electronics were in that player in part 1, it would take a fairly long time to completely recap every single board.
Thank you Sir! I was in Japan (Tokyo) many times in the early 1990s but was too poor to get my hands on this Hi-Vision TV, player and discs! It is really a trip down the memory lane! Nostalgic! Once again thank you for sharing!
Thanks so much for this video, and your other videos. I’ve learned so much from your channel about obscure formats I had no idea existed. It’s amazing to me to think there was high-definition video available as early as 1993 (though even if I’d known about it then, there’s simply no way I could ever have afforded this laserdisc format at that time).
The reason that the image looks oversaturated and dark is because of broadcast standards being different between where it was shot, the intended market, and where you are. If you were to run it through a few correctors in your preferred video editor and re-render it as-is, it'd look completely normal. This is why a lot of anime looks pastel to North American markets and why UK television that was not broadcast corrected on the spot looked very grey in the same vein to us. Meanwhile my friend just arrived in Lagos. Nigeria, and went to watch a bunch of her favourite anime, and found it to be RIDICULOUSLY dark on the screen because of different standards between Nigeria and England's players and televisions. This has been somewhat fixed by the fact that digital media doesn't have much of a standard, however, this is also the case if you were to take a video on a cell phone in one region and send it to another. The compression in some countries means that the video you get has a lot of lost resolution - easy way to test this is Snapchat, which sends back pixellated video from my friends abroad and clear video from my friends near me.
G'day, Techmoan! Well done! That was smashingly good!! "The format is HD and Box Sets are so cool..." (seeing Hi-Vision in action, and doing some comparisons against standard Laserdisc, and Blu-ray) Fabulous job!! By the way, I will agree! Get your "Hi-Vision Laserdisc" repaired. Thank you very much! Cheers! 😊✌🏼📀❤️
Yeah, i would say that it is something related to the laser. Knowing that the other machine has the same p5 error when trying to read a disc and not getting the format right, maybe the silver one has a weak or uncalibrated optical unit.
I bought an audio setup for $24 that retailed for a few thousand, and it just needed a good cleaning and a new cable, so, it's totally reasonable that this just needs a good go with the Lysol.
Never ever put a monitor directly on top of a laserdisc player or VCR. The sheer weight of it can damage the moving internals of the player by pressing down on the top of the case in ways it wasn't designed for, even if it seems okay to you.
D-Theater looked pretty much as good as a blu-ray to me - and since you can keep the chain digital all the way through via HDMI out (on some players) - there's no softness added by the connections.
Funny enough, it's the same compression as DVD if I recall (MPEG II). Obviously that's still way better than MUSE, which is a weird-ass blend of analog and digital that bugs my head up. I've read somewhere about the tape capacities on D-VHS being close to BD disks, like the longer ones reached 50GB storage. Would be quite interesting to see VHS tape backup with a D-VHS deck (if it isn't a thing already, I guess it actually is as well, just rare as heck and unreliable as the machines were)
Yep I remember seeing business backup tape systems that were on that ludicrous size class, they're extremely expensive but they're another class of product. I do mean that I think I've seen someone saying they used a D-VHS deck through Firewire as a tape backup system. I also remember seeing some tape backup based on Video8/Digital8 tape that could hold about 50GB as well, that's at least for me incredible given the size of those tapes.
The LD reminds me of how washed out VHS used to be also, I had almost forgotten about it. It wasn't jus the resolution that was lower, it was the overall quality and image that was worse off as well.
I can still remember renting Back to the Future back in 1986. No one ever thought about the image quality at that time! In fact, even though my father worked on developing HD for mass consumption, I still didn't hear a thing about it until 1993. And it was difficult to imagine what it would be like. My father said that "In the future, televisions will be so sharp, that you can stand hundreds of meters away from them, and as long as you can still see them, the image will be as sharp as if you were sitting in front of it". That might have been a slight exaggeration, but it sounded impossible to begin with, so I wasn't expecting it to be true. It was also in 1993 that a friend of mine brought his Laser Disc player with him to school and showed us White Men Can't Jump. Everyone was stunned. Films on huge CDs? What??? He might as well have beamed down from space.......500 years in the future.
I wish someone would do the same for 90s porn, i remember watching them in those vhs tapes in standard quality , i wish someone with a lot of time in their hands will work on making them HD ill watch them just for nostalgic purposes
@randomguy8196 i dont want to sound creepy but prefer those type of porn maybe because i remember watching them when i was growing up, girls had a different look different body types, maybe its just nostalgia, like those chicago bull dynasty era and Wwf raw is war era in the 90s theres something about that SD look
As foolishly expensive pointless exercises go yours are the best filmed and edited sir! Please don’t stop, the cliffhanger on this one between episodes 1 and 2 was most exciting.
Great insight and demo of a format I had previously not heard about even though I owned a few different models of Laser Disc players since 1994. At the time (before DVD was released) the video and audio quality of Laser Disc compared to VHS was a huge step up and I certainly don't recall any looking as washed out as your demo of Back to the Future.
If you are looking for an other ludicrously, ridiculously over expansive folly of an idea, why no try the ELP Laser turntable ? Would make me happy to see that machine in action on your channel and I expect a lot of others too.
Martin Skywatcher I requested a demo disc for the ELP a decade ago. It was really impressive, but way out of my price range. Still, if I had ~$25k to spend, and a few hundred LPs, I'd go for it.
I really enjoy your videos man. I could genuinely say I love them. I do not personally own any of the things you mention in your videos but I remember a lot of them. your videos make me some kind of nostalgic way and I thank you for this.
If you have just basic soldering skills and minimal knowledge of electronic components, you could even do that yourself. I wouldn't be surprised if those big caps are through-hole anyway.
It might be, the thing is that you'd expect those caps to fail after such a long time (unlike most other components electrolytic caps have a limited life time, even when not used), while the other components don't go bad over time.
I doubt placing a CRT television top of it helped either, you're not supposed to place heavy objects on top of these things, especially considering how packed the interior of that thing is.
The pedant''s off doing extensive research on the Internet in preparation for making interesting comments, Dad's off 'ecking his flips, and the other one has a strained larynx.
Noticed you have some expensive cables to interconnect stuff. Would love for you to review these types of cables against any old bell wire to see what you find. I remember buying in to "oxygen free, gold plated" nonsense for my speakers back in the 90s and convinced myself it sounded better. Plenty of people have torn in to companies like Monster for selling an expensive placebo, so I'd be intrigued to get your down to earth opinion mate. Cheers
My experience with cables has depended more on the devices the cables are being used with than the cables themselves, if that makes any sense. In the majority of applications I've had fine luck with the cheapest of cheap cables, since quite frankly the majority of low- to mid-end electronics are typically designed with said cheap cables in mind to begin with. Really the only time I've had cable ISSUES has to do with interference from other sources, such as audio bleed corrupting video signal on composite connections. This is an issue that is mostly on the side of the hardware generating the signal rather than anything the cables REALLY affect though, given that alternating between dollar store junk cables and relatively decent, much better shielded cables makes little in the way of difference. PC Gamer was testing HDMI cables a few years back, and their consensus was this: over I think 100 feet of cable, so long as the cables are working PROPERLY, there might be a difference in output quality of 1-2 PPI between the cheapest cables they could find and more expensive "snake oil" brands. Between that and my own experiences with many types and brands of cables, I think the conclusion can be made that cables are cables are cables, and unless the poor production value legitimately interferes with the wires being able to carry a signal at all, such as breaks in the wires themselves, you're pretty much good with anything.
My $0.02: Having a "better" cable provides "better" results in analogue applications. However, due to diminishing returns these results are negligible past a certain point. For example, a set of $20 gold plated shielded cables for your RCA jacks will provide better results in that the gold plated connectors won't corrode over time, and the cable is shielded so you don't get interference. Regular $5 cables will probably sound the same at the beginning, and then after a few years it's possible that the connector will corrode somewhat and quality will deteriorate. Also, without shielding, you might get interference from nearby power cables. But will a set of $100 gold-plated shielded cables get better results than a set of $20 gold-plated shielded cables? No. It's the same product, you're paying for brand. And a $1000 set of silver-core cables will likely provide an immeasurably better amount of improved conductivity, but this doesn't translate directly to sound quality. So honestly, I think the best solution is to buy a set of component cables with shielding and gold plating. They're always around, and always cheap. Then pull away the green cable, and the red and blue are your left and right respectively. And the green can be used for anything, maybe a coax digital? In digital applications the cable makes zero difference beyond what I said above (gold so the connector doesn't corrode, shielded from interference). For example, a $3 HDMI cable vs a $1000 cable will provide the exact same picture every time, unless the $3 cable is faulty. Either the 1s and 0s are getting there, or they aren't. I think there was a whole CNET article about this.
All I ask for a cable is that it's coaxial and good connector, that's where the sound and image quality end at. That's all it can do and all it will do to improve it. Basically what I saw there, cables that are thick coaxial ones so they last long enough with the whole testing and plug/unplug stuff, and aren't interference antennas. I usually even do my own cables, but been ages since used any RCA stuff so only headphones cables. With just parallel wire you can hear interference in some cases, where in a coaxial one it's all down to the gear's specs, not much more you can get from cables and I bet he knows that as well
I do b2b audio sales, and it’s incredible how similar the dealer cost for “high-end” cables is compared to the cheap cables. It’s good to get decent mid-level cables, but Monster cables and the like are just insanely marked up.
Well, the trick with things like Monster cables or other insanely priced ultra-premium cables is that they *are* actually engineered to be measurably better in the lab, but in the real world it won't make any difference. If your oxygen free, 99.999% copper, wishnium coated, unicorn fur insulated speaker cables have better transmission characteristics at 50kHz and up...who cares? Yes, they are technically better, but even your dog can't hear the difference. Having said that, if you are going to bury a cable in the wall as I've seen some people do, spend the money on good cables once to be absolutely sure you won't have to open up the wall again to change it later. Also, the super premium cables tend to have really good connectors, which is vital for a reviewer who is going to connect and disconnect them thousands of times, plus I expect it preemptively eliminates the "It doesn't look/sound right because you're using cheap cables!" comments and complaints.
I find it amazing that people like you dedicate their life to simple things like that. I could never do that. But I love to watch it. Find it fascinating! Great job.
Got the notification for this in the car today and was bummed I would have to wait the whole day to watch this. The wait was worth it, though. Great video as always! Also I just noticed The 8-Bit Guy uploaded a video on the NeXT Station so I’m excited to check that out!
If there were a MUSE encode of the original star wars trilogy (as seen on standard LD), the system might be worth the $8000 pricetag. Alas, I guess the standard laserdisc is the best you're going to do.
P5 is a clamping error. There is a rubber sticker that is affixed to the spindle. Over time it gets worn out and cannot clamp the disc properly. The replacement part is still available and costs about $20 through Pioneer. It is referenced as “PIO-DEB1169”, “rubber sheet”. I had the same issue with my X9 and this resolved it. Good luck!
U1 is the clamping error code. It did do this once or twice when pressing play with the disc door open - so I was considering getting that replaced at some point too. forum.lddb.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=7645
@Techmoan, P5 errors can also result from the disc slipping at start-up because that renders the Table-of-Contents and the disc unreadable. As Bill said, a worn/dirty DEB1169 causes weak clamping force and slippage. Try cleaning the rubber ring with a rubber rejuvenator such as Platenclene and see if there's any improvement. And clean the Laser lens if you haven't done so already.
I've lived in Japan for 15 years and now I understand why Japanese always call HD "High Vision".
Do you understand why they named MUSE based on all English words when they have their own glorious proprietary language to play with? Why shy away from awesome Japanese?
@@nthgth Exactly the same reason you just gave, but reversed. English is cool to them. Also Japanese doesn't use an alphabet and as such makes acronyms a bit difficult.
@@nthgth because loan words sound cool
@@wile123456 makes sense
@@nthgth Japan post ww2 has pretty heavy American influences
I remember buying my first DVD movie back in 2000 and family members being super impressed by the quality, even though it was "only" 480p.
I actually got one in 97-98, I think the original Austin Powers and Deep Impact were the first films I bought
As always, a ludicrously excellent set of vids ! I ended up thinking to myself, how would that Save The Watch Tower scene be like side by side with Normal LaserDisc and a DVD ....
Maybe I'm alone in this but I still think DVD looks fine. Hell, I still watch VHS at times. That or I stream...
Something a lot of people do not consider, is pixel density of the device you play it on plays a huge part in how good a video looks. 480p on a 480p screen looks great. It looks like blurry garbage however on a 1080p monitor.
A reason for that is that almot all media had bad quality, air signal channels, VHS even some consoles had less ress than real 480p until N64 and dreamcast came out and some used 480i, so when DVD came out they gave you the "real" 480p experience
5:00 "A touch oversaturated"
I would rather have oversaturated than undersaturated. The regular Laserdisc looks like RAW files that haven't gone through color correction.
@DoctorWeeTodd Well he did say it was an older Back to the Future LD from like 86 or something but Yeah the MUSE/Hi-Vision Color Pops On!?!or Off!?! The Screen! Also Crisper, Smoother and Cleaner Picture if a bit “OverSaturated”. Would Prefer to Look at that! For 93/94 that is Quite an Achievement and Almost 1080i!
Yeah it looks like S-Log.
Thanks for persisting down the rabbit hole that was laserdisc. Don't worry, we'll invent more rabbit holes for you to spelunk. 8k blu-ray discs, anyone?
@@fluxoff Hello, I've read that four-k has higher 'relative to distance' resolution that Conde-Naste magazines; would you agree that it's a relevant comparison?
@@electrictroy2010 5 years is an eternity in tech.
I remember watching a laserdisc movie in 1996 on a regular crt tv , I remember I was blown away by the quality , It was fascinating seeing that at the time
@Joe S Donkey Kong Country was amazing
It still holds up
@Joe S facts
in 1995 a bar had a laserdisc jukebox..... amazing.... you could watch the video on several screen in the bar and the audio through the speakers while drinking a beer or eating a sandwich ))))
@@toffonardi7037 Pretty neat for 95'
I think, you're actually the first person on RUclips showing what a Muse-LD Video looked like. Great job!
Ive seen a few uploads before. But this is the first direct capture and not recording off a tv screen.
This man can get to the best stuff..
@@lucasrem good for you.You such a badass
@@lucasrem PCs aren't TV's. Particularly in the 90s.
@@startedtech I think the first hd displays in japan were ctr. I am not sure, most like a guess.
Wow incredible for 1993....almost as good as Blu-ray
Viral Killer it’s so fucking rare to have a verified account comment with 1 like and no replies
To be honest the Back to the Future Blu-ray was controversially bad so it's not a good example of Blu-ray capabilities.
@@evooff what do you mean by controversially bad?
It's great for the time but nowhere near bluray/digital 1080p+. Let alone 4k lol. Its essentially analogue 480p, doubled as far as resolution and more important motion resolution. For certain things on a CRT its good, even a high quality consumer CRT would look good, the CRT motion res and black levels making up for many of the faults. But 1080i-ish is very different overall. Analogue is also, outside of film... Well a whole extra discussion or point lol. But yeah on a phone screen it looks decent for the time but its analogue 1080i no matter how ya slice it. Blow it up on a later CRT that many homes had, with component possibly, the Enhanced Def sets and it would lose much of that comparable quality to even 1080p. Especially digital, it would be no contest.
@@reptilez13- You expect the average consumer to know too much.
1) There are loads of links in the video description text box
2) Please don't get hung up over the machine breaking at the end - I only mentioned this to explain why there weren't more tests.
For example one thing I'd have liked to compare against the Hi-Vision disc would be my Squeeze (Anamorphic) laserdisc of Cliffhanger because Squeeze was the best that a standard LD could look.
If I'd managed to get all my tests done before it broke down, I'd never have needed to mention its demise..that's all just behind the scenes stuff. Quite often these old things I demo only work for a short period of time - just long enough to make the video about them. I will be getting my repair chap to take another look at the machine in a few weeks and *if* he can get it working again, I may return to do more tests and demos in a future video - but don't hold your breath on that - there's a heck of a lot of stuff in that machine that could fail and not all spare parts will be available after all this time..
However rather than concentrating on the negatives - focus on the positives. We got to see these Japan-only HD Videodiscs from almost 25 years ago in action. That's what I take away from this whole experience. A couple of weeks ago this was something I'd never seen working, but now I have and that experience can't be taken away.
Techmoan I wonder if the caps are having issue, if indeed the power supply is the issue on the second go around or perhaps the motor grease has stiffened over time.
Please don't be concerned about the machine. It is what it is.
At the end - we have these two videos. That's all I set out to do.
The technically minded are concerned about machines in the same way classical surgeons were concerned about the body. If it's unfixable, perhaps you can track someone down in the UK who does in depth electronics teardowns, eg Big Clive or Mikeselectricstuff, you might get an interesting collab out of it too. At the very least our mechanical bloodlust would be sated :^)
Techmoan
Could you ever do a review on the Sony MDS-JB930 QS. Many thanks.
It's such a shame it broke down on you. Luckily you were able to create this wonderful video for us all to enjoy. It would have been nice if you would have been able to use it for yourself afterwards, but as you say, it is what it is. I agree with you with the complicated 90's part. I remember fixing my TV, putting it all together only to open it up again a few weeks later to fix something else. There is just so much electronics in there that it's a miracle it even worked too begin with.
I really enjoyed watching this 2 parter, thank you.
I used to sell Laserdisks to Leonardo Dicaprio at Virgin Megastore in the 90s. After Titanic he couldn't go in the store anymore without being mobbed.
Whilst from the beginning of this series it was difficult to imagine this tech really being useful against modern tech, videos like will go on to be useful from a historical point of view. It’s likely that in another 25-30 years it will be even more difficult to find examples, so good documentation like this might the last actually created.
I'd agree. With the equipment being so expensive and unreliable these days, it's good to have as much captured reference material as possible.
It helps writers and media producers more than anything!
Disks will be rotten by then.
I'd love to see a part 3 for this! The thing about ludicrously expensive ideas like this is that unless someone has the means, nobody will get to enjoy how ludicrous it is. You already have the MUSE equipment, you have someone who can do repairs nearby, and you're probably it's foremost expert now. Plus im sure we all want to hear your opinion about the practical watchability of these discs.
This this this this this and patronize Techmoan.
I'm surprised at how good the quality is of Hi-Vision vs the standard Laserdisc. You can actually read the text in the background and make out the registration on the car that almost runs Marty over. Of course, Blu-Ray is in FullHD then but Hi-Vision looks like 720p in comparison, minus the blurry background.
I'd be curious to see more footage comparison versus VHS or even S-VHS.
I agree Hi-vision rocks
Same, especially when it comes to colours, Hi-vision approached blu-ray quality!
Exactly and it was analog video and blu ray is digi its like vga vs hdmi !
It looks like 720p but it's actually technically closer to 1080i in resolution (interlaced 1035 visible lines). I bet if we had this going on for longer, it could actually get closer to the sharpness we have in current full HD (native, not oversampled from 4K, that is not fair). Also there's the multiple interlacing system that made it blurier, I would guess it's amazingly sharp at stills. Not to mention BD capture through HDMI or straight rip vs analog HD capture is quite a difference too, even for Component video it's on it's edge.
Not quite VGA vs HDMI, considering VGA can show 1080p which is non interlaced without any compression trickery going on.
All praise the mighty HDMI
It certainly is a Handy Dandy Media Interface
Converting all my videogames to HDMI,best thing ever
Well done for getting two videos out despite the machine giving-up on you.
Well no wonder it failed, it says “made in Japan “
What are you talking about? All the best stuff is made in Japan.
weeeeb
Wife it’s a quote from the film
@Tomi Tuominen Buy Asian stuff in general, the Chinese are capable of making high quality stuff too when its not from a sweatshop.
This is heavy.
It's a different story from the "post-war days" to the "modern days" up until the 80s japanese tools, hardware, electronics, cars etc were cheap products it was only later when they had fully recovered from the war that their quality in products returned. If you ask the old folks or boomers they can tell you.
10 out of 10 for dedication in getting this system shown in this video. Fascinating stuff. Thanks for the video
I didn't really encounter HD video properly until the late 2000's. It's incredible to me that home video of this quality was available to the public (albeit only the public with money to burn) all the way back in 1993!
We know dude, it's not what I'd buy. But I'm so glad you do such immense research on old tech. It's really bloody interesting.
Lots of thanks for uploading this! I've always been fascinated by MUSE LDs but online video samples of them are almost nonexistent. This helps tremendously to show off the quality a MUSE system could produce. An interesting yet tremendously niche technology that we can finally see in action. Thanks again!
Amazing how this technology didn't take off... Imagine watching this incredibly clear resolution in the mid 90's...
Alot of it was due to price. Laserdisc was never that popular in the US because it was darn expensive.
MUSE LD was an even more expensive form of a technology that didn't take off because it was too expensive for the mass market, so... no, it's not amazing at all that it didn't take off :)
Although I never owned a LD player, it still amazes me how enjoyable the disc format technology can be. To this very day I still own lots of series on standard definition DVD and the quality is still very much appreciated. With the latest trend of streaming, I have found that the "magic" is gone of yesteryears solid engineering.
I'm really blown away by how good the HiVision looked. I had no idea that level of picture quality was possible anywhere close to that timeframe. Thanks for putting out yet another wonderfully interesting and informative video!
I'm glad you got this to work, if only for a brief period of time. I'm sure a home cinema set up with Hi-vision laserdisc and four-channel audio would've blown people's minds back then. Makes me think about how even 4K HDR isn't really that expensive anymore nowadays.
I could listen to you explain things for hours. Have you considered doing a podcast? I'm sorry people were so rude yesterday about having to split the video into two parts. Split your videos into as many as you want, i'll still be watching them all! Thanks for the great entertainment!
You people are weird
Colin M yeah, how dare people be interested in technology.
Thank you for the lengths you go to bring us such fascinating and informative videos! And for preserving and documenting technology from the past for the future :) You're awesome!
Thank you for your dedication in bringing us the best of old tech. I really appreciate all the work you put into your videos. Always look forward to everything you do. I'm an electronics major, class of '88. This stuff brings back a lot of old memories.
The reason why the picture appears washed out is because you dont have the d-ext mode enabled. What this does is it sets the proper ire level for ntsc and ntsc-j discs. So if you are watching an ntsc disc on this japanese player, it will look washed out because it defaults to the japanese black levels. This is only corrected by enabling the d-ext feature.
The problem with the x9 is that you need the remote to access it as it does not have a button for it on the chassis. Your problem is you have the wrong remote! The remote you have is a CU-CLD108 which was designed for the Pioneer CLD-HF9G. The correct remote for this machine is a CU-HLD003 which has the hi-vision logo in the top right hand corner, whereas the remote you currently have only says laserdisc. They are the same design though, however unless im extremely mistaken, the HF9G does not have this feautre on the remote, therefore you would be unable to access it and take true advantage of this machine.
Having said all that, most modern tvs have built in black correction so it wouldnt be too big a deal to get the tv properly calibrated for ntsc discs.
But I suppose it doesnt matter now considering the machine stopped working. Hopefully you can get it repaired as it is a beauty!
Bravo! You've really raised your already high bar with this series, TM. Absolutely brilliant in every way. I'm awestruck by your ability to dredge up all manner of obscure tech relics and turn them into hugely compelling, professionally produced and presented YT content. Hard to believe you (may) also hold down a day job.
Obviously don't sell it - ever.
It's a beautiful piece of equitment working or not.
One note: the washed out colors of the standard Laserdisc might be because of the S-Video electronics and not the disc itself. I've seen color problems of this nature in S-Video electronics before. Back before digital and component, I had a couple devices where composite gave a better picture than S-Video just because of poor S-Video electronics.
I have a Denon player connected to a cheap composite or svideo to HDMI converter. The stream on the laserdisc is composite and the s-video converter in my player is best avoided. It may be that even though the hi vision player has a good comb filter that it is still not the way to go. In the end it is adding another layer of video processing when a capture device is in play.
Wider color gamut of older NTSC needs to be converted by color management for display on a narrow gamut HDTV set (rec.709/sRGB).
Japan used NTSC (1953) gamut until 2011 (IIRC).
This is why screen captures of old anime titles on websites always look pale: they need to be converted through the correct color profile to match gamut with the monitor.
The standard NTSC Laserdisc would no doubt look colorful and rich on a matching CRT display from that era.
In basic terms, the primary colors (phosphers) used and the contrast/levels curves of the video and the display need to be matched (or the signal corrected to match the display).
The difference in color and contrast for MUSE and standard in this demonstration might be caused by this issue.
If the problem is standards related, it cannot be fixed with contrast and color adjustments. The signal needs to be remapped to a different standard.
Color/contrast makes a superficial improvement but does not correct the underlying problem.
Increasing contrast will destroy image information by clipping dark colors to black and light colours to white, so the picture loses detail.
Increasing color does not change the colors of the primaries to a different set of red/blue/greens. It will make colors more intense, but they will still be the wrong colors.
@@CL-ik1kh I read it somewhere years ago but did not keep a link. I am aware of the contradiction, but considered the source as correct because screen captures from DVDs achieve the expected color and levels when an NTSC(1953) ICC profile is attached to them.
Perhaps it is mistaken, and the color correction seems to work for some other reason (by coincidence).
Just checking Wikipedia article on topic comes up with "Japanese NTSC never changed primaries and whitepoint to SMPTE "C", continuing to use the 1953 NTSC primaries and whitepoint."
However, it might pay to source the paper cited to be sure the summary is not ambiguous within the context of the article.
I should stress I am not an expert in this field, I am a hobbyist (former biologist, not TV engineer) who's put some effort into trying to understand color management, etc, and could well be mistaken.
@@CL-ik1kh I figure there is no harm done attaching ICC profiles to screen captures: looks better, original data remains unchanged, decision can be easily reversed.
But contradictory sources are frustrating.
Unless they are sort of both correct at the same time (hybrid practice). Perhaps Japan started using SMPTE-C with a different black level, but kept the physical displays on NTSC(1953), then mastered the SMPTE-C content with color and levels adjusted to work on that hardware?
What a rollercoaster, thank you for going through all of this to bring us as much as you have. I'm still amazed that the modern TV was able to show the HD signal from the decoder, but I suppose it is analogue.
I did spot on the first half I see some bulged caps on the other boards on the player
Watched this again as it was so good. Did your guy ever manage to get it working again? Appreciate what you say about the transfer from 25 years ago not being as good as the 2010 one on the bluray - one can only wonder how the LD MUSE technology would look with the latest transfer as its source. All very fascinating stuff to a films on disc enthusiast like myself. 👍
MUSE sounds like an analog version of MPEG, because MPEG uses the same psychological principles to encode motion. MPEG uses key frames and motion vectors in the digital domain, where MUSE does the same in the analog domain.
Stoney3K
I don't think it works in the way that MPEG uses macroblocks, though?
It looks pretty much like the MUSE system pretty much just spins the disk faster, so four (interlaced) fields get spat out in the same time as a normal two-field frame would, which gives them the higher resolution. (higher overall bandwidth, greater number of lines.)
I haven't read up on the rest yet, but I suspect the decoder then stores the previous fields in a framebuffer, so it can do it's combining algo, and also figure out the motion based on the previous fields.
I've always wanted to capture a MUSE RF signal, to try to decode it in software.
There is a project happening atm which captures the raw RF signal from a Laserdisc player, and was originally meant for getting faithful captures of the BBC "Domesday" disks from the 80s.
The same ADC board might just be fast enough to capture the raw MUSE signal, though.
It might even be possible to decode a Hi-Vision disk on a standard Laserdisc player, assuming it could be forced to spin up the disk.
(Probably wouldn't work at all, though, due to the use of the red laser on the Hi-Vision players.)
Wish I had a Hi-Vision disk and a cheap LD player to mess with. I would even attempt to build a laser sled for reading it (with a DVD red laser pickup), but it's probably not worth all of that effort. lol
That's what I thought at first but apparently MUSE is mostly digital. The first thing the decoder does is pass the signal through an analog to digital converter, then do all the processing. I was quite disappointed when I first found out, heh. There's a diagram of the decoder here www.avsforum.com/forum/114-hdtv-software-media-discussion/980435-things-make-you-go-hmmm-laserdisc-versus-hdm-8.html#post12955801
@@Dani128 If it was mostly digital then it's shame they did not go all the way do digital disc. Looks like a half-one design, or maybe a consequence of maintaining LD reading.
I miss old times, VHS, DVD movies....It was special to go and rent a movie then watch it..now when everything is available it does not have value. I don't even watch movies anymore. At first I was astonished, woow I can download whatever I want but later I was like...drowning in the sea of everything so I just skydive today and ride.
I have to agree. I watch very few films. I watch more TV series boxsets than anything. I think the saturation of the modern market has killed the enjoyment of it.
It had a certain charm, but I don't feel the same way. I still have to put time aside to watch something, so the thought of picking something out still goes into what I watch for the night. I really don't miss going to Blockbuster to rent a movie I really wanted to see only to find out they are out of copies. Then you either rent something else, sit and wait and hope someone returns it, or go home empty handed.
@@Movie_Gamesthere were so many games I rented back then and more I should have so I never left the rental stores empty handed.
I prefer today
Linus Magnus I’m the same used to love movies now can’t be stuffed with em
Besides being able to play hi-vision, the X9 is probably the best laserdisc player in the world in terms of playback quality. Best SNR, lowest crosstalk, and best comb filters of any player. I'd say it would be worth fixing it.
I’ve seen other videos where the only issue with a laserdisc player is dried/old lubricant on the pickup mechanism or the same or a belt with the tray mechanism.
According to tests (video essentials laserdisc) done by members of originaltrilogy.com, the Pioneer HLD-X0 has the best picture quality of any laserdisc player. But the X9 appears to be a very similar build (both were sold only in Japan) and should be almost as good.
Definitely worth fixing.
Knightmessenger the X0 has even better build quality (the thing weighs 80 pounds!). You can barely hear the disc spinning with all the layers of metal shielding it has. Everything about it softly speaks to no-compromise design.
It’s slightly older than the X9, so it doesn’t have as advanced of a comb filter, but arguably looks smoother and less digitally processed.
I really wish mine worked... it was half destroyed when I got it, but I got it working for a while. Even in rough condition, it far surpassed every other player I’ve seen (far too many to be considered “healthy”)
Junk
Thank you for all these great videos I love showing my kids old tech. My 14 year old wants to go to college in recording and audio so all this stuff is gold . I've owned a few things you have posted it's really cool seeing that stuff again.
9:42 I didn't know that I wanted to hear JDM static until right now.
i was thinking myself i cant believe anyone would actually ask to hear it , some people are nuts! lol
Well, I think i'm crazy cuz i wanna hear it hahahahahahaha, there is something pleasant on this noise ^^
LOL. The best part is he anticipated he'd get asked about it and delivered. I bet that person likes to get freaky with static, in an ASMR kinda way.
I bet it too hahahahahahaha
You're basically hearing the vertical sync pulse occurring 50/60 times a second (so roughly 50/60 Hz square tone with extra harmonics). You aren't hearing much of the actual signal itself (since it'll be 16 MHz and way beyond any sound card recording, let alone hearing.)
I've always been curious about this format, I could have sworn that I read somewhere awhile back about a bootleg market for HD laser discs in China, but could be wrong. I have to say that the format actually holds up fairly well against Blu-Ray, especially when you consider how old the tech is.
Techmoan is YT in High definition !
Coleção Nintendo most of the content on RUclips is
Yes, if your PC, Tablet or phone has a 1080 display it should be an option,
Take a look at the settings panel to the bottom right of the video.
I think it was a statement rather than question))
Captain Araf Mine is 720p
i have 8k!
Thank you for the immense amount of effort you put into making these videos Mat! Even though they obviously don't get tons of views, all of us that do watch them really love them. They're the best of their kind on RUclips, as far as I'm concerned. Cheers!
This was so good watching part 1 and then waiting for part 2.
Lots of twists and turns. Loved it.
Totally worth the few thousand pounds!
2 related items.
In the late 1960's, the Smithsonian Institution (where my father worked at the time) had a 6 month (I believe) exhibit sponsored in part by AMPX which featured a large screen demonstration of what HD TV could look like in the future. If I remember right, the screen was a 16x9 CRT about 3 or 3 1/2 feet across. The exhibit also included the latest AMPEX, 3 inch video tape machine. Also, on its original crane dolly, one of the only 3 original Technicolor 70mm movie cameras. The exhibit was designed to demonstrate the highest levels of past and future qualities in media.
Between 1992 and 1993, I volunteered at the US National Park Service's Harpers Ferry Center, where many of the museums, brochures, books and films the public sees in the various parks are developed. For a few years in the early 1990's, some of the larger parks were using Hi-Vision Laserdisc, via upscale line doubling (or in a few cases quadrupling) to project their films in the park's visitor centers. Yellowstone, Yosemite, Grand Canyon, and a few others had these systems until they were eventually switched to Blue-Ray. I think they are now using computer versions.
Blown away by hivision. Compared to bluray it really isn't that much worse. Off Course you could say there is a huge difference, but what would happen if you would play this for your friends. Would they notice it? I bet rich people with their own theater rooms had this way back.
Am I the only one who wants to see back to the future now?
if your in the UK its on Film 4 at this moment
Ha, thanks. I'm from the Netherlands.
I think the muse format really could hold up to a blu ray. The issue is the transfers of the past are just complete garbage compared to what we have now.
Good stuff, thanks so much for sharing!
It is the most fucking Rare to find a comment made by a verified account with no likes or reply’s and its 2 years old
Not really. Especially when most of my comments are way after the video went live. Most of the super upvoted ones were made right when the video went live before all the viewers showed up :P
EposVox well I have completed my final accomplishment on RUclips! Get a reply from a verified and popular RUclipsr!
In 1993, I was more concerned with trying to get Hi-Fi (High-Fidelity), stereo SOUND for a "home-theater" experience from a "4-head Hi-Fi VCR"-didn't know what a *pixel* even was!
One important thing to remember is that whilst the MUSE system died quickly, the underlying1125/60 HiVision video standard is an incredibly close relative to the current HD standards we use around the world. 1125/60 may not sound like 1080/59.94i or 1080/50i - but both 1080/60i and 1080/50i are based on 1125 total lines (with 1080 active lines, compared to the 1035-1050 active lines that HiVision used originally). The standard was tweaked slightly to allow for a nice square pixel resolution and almost-nice MPEG2 multiple.
We don't call our current systems 1125/50 or 1125/59.94 - but that's what they are :) All the broadcast kit designed for 1125/60i HiVision was relatively easy to modify or convert for the new, nearly identical, now-called 1080/59.94i format used for production for digital MPEG2 distribution. That's why 1080i had such a head start over 720p in the US (where 720p was a brand-new format, 1080i was based on one that had literally been in use for decades).
(One subtle difference is that HiVision in the 90s was 60.00Hz based and didn't use the 59.94Hz refresh rate of NTSC that current 1080i standards do in '60Hz' territories. Conversion between 1125/60i and 525/59.94i meant some quite complex processing was needed to hide the dropped frames on cuts where possible etc.)
The BBC shot a drama on the HiVision baseband format in association with NHK. 'The Ginger Tree', which was broadcast in 1989. This was shot 1125/60i - using a largely BBC camera crew I believe - and edited using 1" open-reel DIGITAL (Yep!) VTRs at BBC Television Centre. Unfortunately there was no direct 1125/60i to 625/50i converter available at the time - so the BBC domestic broadcast went via 525/60i I believe (hopefully not via NTSC composite...)
Iam giving this a 👍👍👍 just for the amount of time and effort and cash went in to making this, for me to chill out while nursing the biggest hangover ever!
Thank you for your work on this. There are too many obscure pieces of tech or individual near-mythical units out there that will sit unsold forever on eBay at insane prices, or be speculated about endlessly on message boards. It was a real treat to see the video comparisons for BttF. I appreciate your point about the improvements in film-scanning technologies. If it had an input it would be fascinating to see test signals/patterns or footage to find out the true limits of the encoding. But, of course, we have all seen the shortcomings of "born-digital" over-the-air HDTV with low bitrates compared to the 35+ MBps available to commercial Blu-rays.
Consider what I wrote above a general note of appreciation for your work. I only found your channel a month or two ago and I have fallen down the rabbit hole. Great research, editing and video quality make each one damn near definitive.
Never knew about this "Hi-Vision Laserdisc ".
Thanks for the information !
*Scary to think that in 20 years 4K will be like watching HD quality all over again.*
One of the odder things I've read about is the "Hi-Vision" PC Engine successor which was only demonstrated back in 1993(4?). A multi-player bomberman was the highlight, demonstrated on some tradeshow. They cut the amount of hardware before releasing, turning it into a real turkey of a system that nobody bought - basically just a CD-ROM, jpeg-decoder and a powerful blitter. The problem was that the system was supposed to have several blitters. So in the end it was suitable only for terrible FMV games, and it was crushed by the competiton.
Edit: Shown in 1993 as HI-Ten Bomberman. This lead to project tetsuin which ended up as PC-FX.
The most thrilling big budget cliffhanger I've seen in a decade. I am not being ironical. Thank you and bring back analogue!
My advice to you:
Cut loss, sell the machine back to Japan, even a broken one they are welcome because I'm sure many parts inside this machine still works.
Sell those hi-vision discs on ebay, that's it.
I'm happy part 2 of this video came out so quick. I also love how Back to the Future is your go to comparison for video quality.
I wonder what the picture would have looked like if they had invented the HDMI interface back then. Fascinating to see how many ideas about the future were out there at that time. Cheers.
There isn't much of a difference in the image quality of a 1080i signal over component or HDMI if you're comparing using the same source and have good DACs for the component signal. That said, HDMI usually comes out ahead because a lot of devices with component output don't have particularly good DACs, and you can do 1080p over HDMI, while component is limited to 1080i (as far as the CEA 770.3-D-2008 standard goes).
This two-part video series on the Hi-Vision LD series was absolutely fascinating to me. To think that what we perceive as contemporary tech in the US, and other countries when it comes to HD was already in full swing in Japan when I was just 11 years old in 1991! I've always been marveled by Japanese ingenuity by their creative capabilities and this Hi-Vision format just continues to validate how deft Japanese engineering is with everything ahead of its time; hell, they're now broadcasting 8K video signals in their country! I look forward to more of your insightful videos Techmoan as they've both educated and excited me in discovering all this phenomenal tech that existed back when I was a kid and as an adult like HD VHS! You have to love Sony as they pride themselves in being the pioneers with a repertoire of both successful and defunct tech like the Minidisc format. I still have my Minidisc player in my 2000 Honda Civic; it still works and I love using it!
I’d be willing to bet it just needs to be recapped. The capacitors in the replacement PSU were just as old, the only reason they lasted any longer at all was because they hadn’t yet been used. (The aging is largely independent of use.) If i were nearby I’d offer to do it.
The other thing that’s possible is that the laser has weakened, in which case there’s a trim pot in there somewhere. But I wouldn’t touch that until ruling out capacitor failure by full recapping.
Your videos are brilliant. I've been binge-watching them over the last couple of weeks and feel I've learned a lot. Your enthusiasm's great too; you're one of the good guys in life, Mr. Techmoan.
What a shame it broke. Maybe the weight of the CRT bent the frame and caused a short in one of those many circuit boards? Hopefully these videos will make enough to afford repairs, cheers!
You could park a tank on the case without any bending. The tank might get damaged though.
At that quality level, that would seem insane to get broken by a crt on it.
Steve Martino not really; the machine he used was last manufactured in 2002, which was right smack in the middle of the global Capacitor Plague of the early 2000s. More than likely, the capacitors went bad like a worn out timing belt snapping on a twin cam engine; both instances results in an expensive paperweight.
@ digitalrailroader
that's what i was thinking, i don't think it would cost much to have the player recaped and the boards clean of the spilled electrolytic
SilverX95 but you saw how tightly packaged all of the electronics were in that player in part 1, it would take a fairly long time to completely recap every single board.
Thank you Sir! I was in Japan (Tokyo) many times in the early 1990s but was too poor to get my hands on this Hi-Vision TV, player and discs! It is really a trip down the memory lane! Nostalgic! Once again thank you for sharing!
My rather powerful 2017 27" iMac got exhausted and started huffing and puffing a bit when you talked about the weight of the player.
Thanks so much for this video, and your other videos. I’ve learned so much from your channel about obscure formats I had no idea existed. It’s amazing to me to think there was high-definition video available as early as 1993 (though even if I’d known about it then, there’s simply no way I could ever have afforded this laserdisc format at that time).
The reason that the image looks oversaturated and dark is because of broadcast standards being different between where it was shot, the intended market, and where you are. If you were to run it through a few correctors in your preferred video editor and re-render it as-is, it'd look completely normal. This is why a lot of anime looks pastel to North American markets and why UK television that was not broadcast corrected on the spot looked very grey in the same vein to us. Meanwhile my friend just arrived in Lagos. Nigeria, and went to watch a bunch of her favourite anime, and found it to be RIDICULOUSLY dark on the screen because of different standards between Nigeria and England's players and televisions. This has been somewhat fixed by the fact that digital media doesn't have much of a standard, however, this is also the case if you were to take a video on a cell phone in one region and send it to another. The compression in some countries means that the video you get has a lot of lost resolution - easy way to test this is Snapchat, which sends back pixellated video from my friends abroad and clear video from my friends near me.
somehow anime looks choppy when you run with 60hz when i run with 72hz (24p/23.976p) it looks smoother
@@el-danihasbiarta1200 Yeah. Most animation is done at 24fps or slower. Especially if it is hand drawn. Easier to do.
G'day, Techmoan! Well done! That was smashingly good!! "The format is HD and Box Sets are so cool..." (seeing Hi-Vision in action, and doing some comparisons against standard Laserdisc, and Blu-ray) Fabulous job!! By the way, I will agree! Get your "Hi-Vision Laserdisc" repaired. Thank you very much!
Cheers! 😊✌🏼📀❤️
Might just need the laser cleaning - worth a try.
mordokch that was my thought too...or readjusted too.
It might be the grease for the laser sled has gotten too stiff. This may not be that complicated a repair.
Yeah, i would say that it is something related to the laser. Knowing that the other machine has the same p5 error when trying to read a disc and not getting the format right, maybe the silver one has a weak or uncalibrated optical unit.
I bought an audio setup for $24 that retailed for a few thousand, and it just needed a good cleaning and a new cable, so, it's totally reasonable that this just needs a good go with the Lysol.
I love this guy. I'm revisiting this video and all of them again because of the quarantine. I really enjoy this content.
Thanks Mr. TECHMOAN
Thank you for an interesting and well researched video. I never knew these types of high definition Laserdiscs even existed.
Never ever put a monitor directly on top of a laserdisc player or VCR. The sheer weight of it can damage the moving internals of the player by pressing down on the top of the case in ways it wasn't designed for, even if it seems okay to you.
From the short experience you had do you think it looked better or worse than D-Theater?
D-Theater looked pretty much as good as a blu-ray to me - and since you can keep the chain digital all the way through via HDMI out (on some players) - there's no softness added by the connections.
I see thanks for the answer, in fact rewatching that D-Theather video you uploaded it surely looks better
Honestly for Laser Disc Analog HD it looks damn near like Blu Ray like a VGA cable looks near HDMI in high resolutions incredible !
Funny enough, it's the same compression as DVD if I recall (MPEG II).
Obviously that's still way better than MUSE, which is a weird-ass blend of analog and digital that bugs my head up.
I've read somewhere about the tape capacities on D-VHS being close to BD disks, like the longer ones reached 50GB storage. Would be quite interesting to see VHS tape backup with a D-VHS deck (if it isn't a thing already, I guess it actually is as well, just rare as heck and unreliable as the machines were)
Yep I remember seeing business backup tape systems that were on that ludicrous size class, they're extremely expensive but they're another class of product.
I do mean that I think I've seen someone saying they used a D-VHS deck through Firewire as a tape backup system.
I also remember seeing some tape backup based on Video8/Digital8 tape that could hold about 50GB as well, that's at least for me incredible given the size of those tapes.
So much quality in this channel. Thank you from Portugal :)
The LD reminds me of how washed out VHS used to be also, I had almost forgotten about it. It wasn't jus the resolution that was lower, it was the overall quality and image that was worse off as well.
Amazing the progress over a few short decades. Thanks for sharing. Probably my favourite RUclips channel.
Great video. Not sure why, but I would have liked to have seen Hi-Vision quality stacked up against DVD quality, just for kicks.
I can still remember renting Back to the Future back in 1986. No one ever thought about the image quality at that time!
In fact, even though my father worked on developing HD for mass consumption, I still didn't hear a thing about it until 1993.
And it was difficult to imagine what it would be like. My father said that "In the future, televisions will be so sharp, that you can stand hundreds
of meters away from them, and as long as you can still see them, the image will be as sharp as if you were sitting in front of it".
That might have been a slight exaggeration, but it sounded impossible to begin with, so I wasn't expecting it to be true.
It was also in 1993 that a friend of mine brought his Laser Disc player with him to school and showed us White Men Can't Jump.
Everyone was stunned. Films on huge CDs? What??? He might as well have beamed down from space.......500 years in the future.
5:42 - Under the clock you can't even see the text on the building. Why's that? you can see signs on most other buildings. Interesting.
Serious respect for putting so much time and effort into this video. You're really dedicated to your RUclips craft and I love watching your content.
"available from my overpriced merchandise store" hilarious
So much effort put into a format that forces you to stop the movie one or more times
I wish someone would do the same for 90s porn, i remember watching them in those vhs tapes in standard quality , i wish someone with a lot of time in their hands will work on making them HD ill watch them just for nostalgic purposes
Is this a half joke and a half true petition?
@@leavemaualone2295 im full hearted serious , 2010s porn are great, but girls had a different look in the 90s
@randomguy8196 i dont want to sound creepy but prefer those type of porn maybe because i remember watching them when i was growing up, girls had a different look different body types, maybe its just nostalgia, like those chicago bull dynasty era and Wwf raw is war era in the 90s theres something about that SD look
@randomguy8196 I honestly would see a 4K Remastered version of a vintage porn if it's possible
@randomguy8196 The HD laserdisc actually didn't add any lines..... It's not HD in the sense we call HD nowadays.
As foolishly expensive pointless exercises go yours are the best filmed and edited sir! Please don’t stop, the cliffhanger on this one between episodes 1 and 2 was most exciting.
Great insight and demo of a format I had previously not heard about even though I owned a few different models of Laser Disc players since 1994. At the time (before DVD was released) the video and audio quality of Laser Disc compared to VHS was a huge step up and I certainly don't recall any looking as washed out as your demo of Back to the Future.
If you are looking for an other ludicrously, ridiculously over expansive folly of an idea, why no try the ELP Laser turntable ? Would make me happy to see that machine in action on your channel and I expect a lot of others too.
Martin Skywatcher I requested a demo disc for the ELP a decade ago. It was really impressive, but way out of my price range.
Still, if I had ~$25k to spend, and a few hundred LPs, I'd go for it.
James Shaw Second hand they are "only" $15k. 😃
VWestlife I must have missed that video, any chance you know which video it was ?
I really enjoy your videos man.
I could genuinely say I love them.
I do not personally own any of the things you mention in your videos but I remember a lot of them.
your videos make me some kind of nostalgic way and I thank you for this.
Let the repair guy recap the current PSU that is inside this thing and I guess this thing will work for another 20+ years.
If you have just basic soldering skills and minimal knowledge of electronic components, you could even do that yourself. I wouldn't be surprised if those big caps are through-hole anyway.
It may be more than just the capacitors on the power supply board.
It might be, the thing is that you'd expect those caps to fail after such a long time (unlike most other components electrolytic caps have a limited life time, even when not used), while the other components don't go bad over time.
I doubt placing a CRT television top of it helped either, you're not supposed to place heavy objects on top of these things, especially considering how packed the interior of that thing is.
I appreciate what you went through to make this video happen!
No puppets? Sad now...
Majenko Technologies I missed then too
The pedant''s off doing extensive research on the Internet in preparation for making interesting comments, Dad's off 'ecking his flips, and the other one has a strained larynx.
I've always loved early HD content and formats, as well as the early HD TVs.
Noticed you have some expensive cables to interconnect stuff. Would love for you to review these types of cables against any old bell wire to see what you find. I remember buying in to "oxygen free, gold plated" nonsense for my speakers back in the 90s and convinced myself it sounded better. Plenty of people have torn in to companies like Monster for selling an expensive placebo, so I'd be intrigued to get your down to earth opinion mate. Cheers
My experience with cables has depended more on the devices the cables are being used with than the cables themselves, if that makes any sense. In the majority of applications I've had fine luck with the cheapest of cheap cables, since quite frankly the majority of low- to mid-end electronics are typically designed with said cheap cables in mind to begin with. Really the only time I've had cable ISSUES has to do with interference from other sources, such as audio bleed corrupting video signal on composite connections. This is an issue that is mostly on the side of the hardware generating the signal rather than anything the cables REALLY affect though, given that alternating between dollar store junk cables and relatively decent, much better shielded cables makes little in the way of difference.
PC Gamer was testing HDMI cables a few years back, and their consensus was this: over I think 100 feet of cable, so long as the cables are working PROPERLY, there might be a difference in output quality of 1-2 PPI between the cheapest cables they could find and more expensive "snake oil" brands. Between that and my own experiences with many types and brands of cables, I think the conclusion can be made that cables are cables are cables, and unless the poor production value legitimately interferes with the wires being able to carry a signal at all, such as breaks in the wires themselves, you're pretty much good with anything.
My $0.02:
Having a "better" cable provides "better" results in analogue applications. However, due to diminishing returns these results are negligible past a certain point. For example, a set of $20 gold plated shielded cables for your RCA jacks will provide better results in that the gold plated connectors won't corrode over time, and the cable is shielded so you don't get interference. Regular $5 cables will probably sound the same at the beginning, and then after a few years it's possible that the connector will corrode somewhat and quality will deteriorate. Also, without shielding, you might get interference from nearby power cables.
But will a set of $100 gold-plated shielded cables get better results than a set of $20 gold-plated shielded cables? No. It's the same product, you're paying for brand. And a $1000 set of silver-core cables will likely provide an immeasurably better amount of improved conductivity, but this doesn't translate directly to sound quality. So honestly, I think the best solution is to buy a set of component cables with shielding and gold plating. They're always around, and always cheap. Then pull away the green cable, and the red and blue are your left and right respectively. And the green can be used for anything, maybe a coax digital?
In digital applications the cable makes zero difference beyond what I said above (gold so the connector doesn't corrode, shielded from interference). For example, a $3 HDMI cable vs a $1000 cable will provide the exact same picture every time, unless the $3 cable is faulty. Either the 1s and 0s are getting there, or they aren't. I think there was a whole CNET article about this.
All I ask for a cable is that it's coaxial and good connector, that's where the sound and image quality end at. That's all it can do and all it will do to improve it. Basically what I saw there, cables that are thick coaxial ones so they last long enough with the whole testing and plug/unplug stuff, and aren't interference antennas. I usually even do my own cables, but been ages since used any RCA stuff so only headphones cables. With just parallel wire you can hear interference in some cases, where in a coaxial one it's all down to the gear's specs, not much more you can get from cables and I bet he knows that as well
I do b2b audio sales, and it’s incredible how similar the dealer cost for “high-end” cables is compared to the cheap cables. It’s good to get decent mid-level cables, but Monster cables and the like are just insanely marked up.
Well, the trick with things like Monster cables or other insanely priced ultra-premium cables is that they *are* actually engineered to be measurably better in the lab, but in the real world it won't make any difference. If your oxygen free, 99.999% copper, wishnium coated, unicorn fur insulated speaker cables have better transmission characteristics at 50kHz and up...who cares? Yes, they are technically better, but even your dog can't hear the difference. Having said that, if you are going to bury a cable in the wall as I've seen some people do, spend the money on good cables once to be absolutely sure you won't have to open up the wall again to change it later. Also, the super premium cables tend to have really good connectors, which is vital for a reviewer who is going to connect and disconnect them thousands of times, plus I expect it preemptively eliminates the "It doesn't look/sound right because you're using cheap cables!" comments and complaints.
I find it amazing that people like you dedicate their life to simple things like that. I could never do that. But I love to watch it. Find it fascinating! Great job.
Gorgeous device but way to expensive for me.
RetroMicky82 how much did it cost?
he said like $3000 for everything
I like many have been waiting for these videos and im glad it was you techmoan to give them to me!
Literally finished part 1 five minutes ago 😁
Chris Tsangari Congrats!!!
Your sacrifice in terms of time and money is greatly appreciated! This was amazing to see.
I waited for part two before watching part one so I didn't have to watch the whole thing with a gap :D
You see now that's smart. Just taking it easy, not rushing. Knowing it's not going away.
Got the notification for this in the car today and was bummed I would have to wait the whole day to watch this. The wait was worth it, though. Great video as always!
Also I just noticed The 8-Bit Guy uploaded a video on the NeXT Station so I’m excited to check that out!
If there were a MUSE encode of the original star wars trilogy (as seen on standard LD), the system might be worth the $8000 pricetag. Alas, I guess the standard laserdisc is the best you're going to do.
Wow, I can't imagine how mind blowing this would have been in the 90's, even now I'm impressed with the quality.
4:19 "Matsusita".
*Panasonic* Corporation, formerly known as *Matsushita* Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.
P5 is a clamping error. There is a rubber sticker that is affixed to the spindle. Over time it gets worn out and cannot clamp the disc properly. The replacement part is still available and costs about $20 through Pioneer. It is referenced as “PIO-DEB1169”, “rubber sheet”. I had the same issue with my X9 and this resolved it. Good luck!
U1 is the clamping error code. It did do this once or twice when pressing play with the disc door open - so I was considering getting that replaced at some point too.
forum.lddb.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=7645
@Techmoan, P5 errors can also result from the disc slipping at start-up because that renders the Table-of-Contents and the disc unreadable. As Bill said, a worn/dirty DEB1169 causes weak clamping force and slippage. Try cleaning the rubber ring with a rubber rejuvenator such as Platenclene and see if there's any improvement. And clean the Laser lens if you haven't done so already.
Some videophiles swear by Hi-Vision because the image has more analog warmth.
What about Hi-8?