A super quick way, though not informing of whether we have a lower or upper bound right away, to find bounds like this is to assume a=b=c given the symmetric nature of terms. The answer as expected is 12. One can then move on to the more rigorous proof.
A super quick way, though not informing of whether we have a lower or upper bound right away, to find bounds like this is to assume a=b=c given the symmetric nature of terms. The answer as expected is 12. One can then move on to the more rigorous proof.
A super quick way, though not informing of whether we have a lower or upper bound right away, to find bounds like this is to assume a=b=c given the symmetric nature of terms. The answer as expected is 12. One can then move on to the more rigorous proof.
Forget IPhone's, books, or perfumes for Xmas gifts, the new trend is a nice inequality to solve.
the goat has blessed us with a video
I think I'll make 2025 more videos next year :)
Thank you bro and merry christmas
Really cool! Thanks for the xmas math gift! 😊 Learned some new inequalities.
Very nice holiday special
nice
I dont celebrate christmas but sure
Very cool however the thumbnail is wrong, you have a + c in the denominator of both the middle and right fraction on the thumbnail.
Thanks for letting me know :) (it's fixed now)
@CompassMathematics Yeah you are awesome by the way! Love your videos and methods! Keep it up!
A super quick way, though not informing of whether we have a lower or upper bound right away, to find bounds like this is to assume a=b=c given the symmetric nature of terms. The answer as expected is 12. One can then move on to the more rigorous proof.