It's great to see a detailed real working photographers comparison between the Fujifilm Medium Format and the APS-C sensors and GFX and X-mount lenses . As an X-T4 owner I am glad to see the difference is not massive. Your videos are always great. your images impressive and your models beautiful. Thanks for being there Xing, you are enriching youtube and doing photographers a great service. There is considerable effort and immense skill required to produce this media, free to us. You are inspirational. thanks!
@@robertkeyghobad2981 True but then compare it to FF which is more compact, cheaper, and you can basically match the dynamic range and resolution and get cheaper 1.4 primes which give you very similar background separation.
Thanks for great video, i suppose it will be difficult to catch the huge different only by looking at the video in youtube. Did you find some huge gaps while editing using the monitor?
Thanks for the great comparison! I have to say that I see a big difference between these photos and the GFX 50R is the clear winner in detail and light rendering. The photos made with the 50R look special, some of the photos taken by the X-T4 look like they could have been taken with a smart phone. I own an X-T4, so I am not hating on it.
Nice video, hope someday you test the sigma 18-35 vs some fuji/viltrox prime and full frame equivalent it would be a must as it’s the most popular zoom. 😊👌
Wow great comparison video yet again! I have an X-T3 with all the fast Fuji primes and I find the 23mm 1.4 to be amongst my favorite focal lengths with great depth but also one of the weakest lenses optically. My primary issue is the amount of Chromatic Aberration/Fringing in high dynamic range scenes. Sometimes really bad. Do you ever experience this? How about on any other lenses?
How you finding the gfx + gf50 combo for street photography? is it a lot heavier and less portable than the xt4 combo equivalent? thinking about going MF but it's mostl GAS talking haha
Main difference in contrast and background separation, looks more 3d (a little bit - because it is street, in studio and flashes would be way bigger difference). Will great to see such comparison in-studio with flashes, is it possible you'll make it in near future?)) X-t4 vs R6 would killer comparison (in studio)
I think there is a difference in the rendering of the lips... it's a nice video by the way. I love the way you talk too. I want to see GF 63mm f2.8 and GF 45mm f2.8 compared to the 35mm f1.4 and 23mm f1.4
happy new year, where is that comparison between the nikon 35 f1.8s and this wonderful Fuji 23mm f1.4. The latter seems really to play above its level.
The main difference between MF and APS-C (or FF) is that you have to slow down with a MF. And at the end, you don't go back home with the same pictures. That's without speaking of the dynamic range or the flexibility a size of sensor x4 gives you. However, this XT4 is a very good camera and Fuji has very great lenses in both format. But it's neither for the same purpose nor for the same photographe.
They are both lenses with no character. I have the GF50 3.5 and although it's stunningly sharp, it has no soul. The out of focus rendering is good, but boring. Anyone looking for a lens to use on personal projects to create art then adapt Zeiss lenses. Don't pay so much money for the GF lenses.
I really enjoy your style of live capturing of photos and then doing tons of comparisons. Great presentation!
Thank you so much 😊🙏🙏
Thank you so much for these videos 😍
Thank you for the support 😊🙏
Love this model. Glad to see you work with her again 😊
Thank you 😊
Thank you, your comparisons show just how powerful a little camera like the XT4 is when you compare it with that monster.
Thanks for watching:)
It's great to see a detailed real working photographers comparison between the Fujifilm Medium Format and the APS-C sensors and GFX and X-mount lenses . As an X-T4 owner I am glad to see the difference is not massive. Your videos are always great. your images impressive and your models beautiful. Thanks for being there Xing, you are enriching youtube and doing photographers a great service. There is considerable effort and immense skill required to produce this media, free to us. You are inspirational. thanks!
Thank you so much for the support 😊🙏 X-T4 is very good already 👍🏼
yeah the main differences between Fuji MF and Crop is seen in the ability to zoom in on images and seen in images with incredibly wide dynamic ranges.
Actually when you’re working with faster glass such as the GF 80mm 1.7 or 45mm 2.8 you will see a massive difference in the image.
@@robertkeyghobad2981 True but then compare it to FF which is more compact, cheaper, and you can basically match the dynamic range and resolution and get cheaper 1.4 primes which give you very similar background separation.
Thanks for great video, i suppose it will be difficult to catch the huge different only by looking at the video in youtube. Did you find some huge gaps while editing using the monitor?
Thanks :) yes, about 20 percent sharper from me looking at the monitor zoomed in.
Thanks for the great comparison! I have to say that I see a big difference between these photos and the GFX 50R is the clear winner in detail and light rendering. The photos made with the 50R look special, some of the photos taken by the X-T4 look like they could have been taken with a smart phone. I own an X-T4, so I am not hating on it.
Thanks for sharing your observations 😊🙏
Nice video, hope someday you test the sigma 18-35 vs some fuji/viltrox prime and full frame equivalent it would be a must as it’s the most popular zoom. 😊👌
Thank you so much 😊
Wow great comparison video yet again!
I have an X-T3 with all the fast Fuji primes and I find the 23mm 1.4 to be amongst my favorite focal lengths with great depth but also one of the weakest lenses optically. My primary issue is the amount of Chromatic Aberration/Fringing in high dynamic range scenes. Sometimes really bad.
Do you ever experience this? How about on any other lenses?
Thank you :) I didn’t notice the chromatic personally. I have been shooting this lens about 6 years now. So far so good 😊
Great shots! I take the GF50 3.5 always with me. Nice small lens for travel and street. Also looking forward for the GF80 1.7
Thank you 😊 I would like to test the GF 80 F1.7
@@caliallstaring Thats really fatastic, 80 f1.7 would be the king of bokeh lens.
How you finding the gfx + gf50 combo for street photography? is it a lot heavier and less portable than the xt4 combo equivalent? thinking about going MF but it's mostl GAS talking haha
Thanks 🙏🏻
😊🙏
Nice video , i think more dynamic range on gfx
Thanks
How is the autofocus performance on the GFX with that lens? Is it as fast as the XT4?
AF-S is fine, X-T4 sensor is faster in focusing and eye AF performs better.
Love this model... good job xt-4 ❤️
Thank you for watching:)
Main difference in contrast and background separation, looks more 3d (a little bit - because it is street, in studio and flashes would be way bigger difference). Will great to see such comparison in-studio with flashes, is it possible you'll make it in near future?))
X-t4 vs R6 would killer comparison (in studio)
Currently I don’t have a studio available. But I will make some X-T4 vs R6 later in natural light 😄
thanks for your efforts .
in fact i can't find a HUGE diffrences .
that was shocking for me ;)
Thanks for watching 😊🙏
Please compare the a7c and canon eos r 🙏🏻 i trust you
I think there is a difference in the rendering of the lips... it's a nice video by the way. I love the way you talk too.
I want to see GF 63mm f2.8 and GF 45mm f2.8 compared to the 35mm f1.4 and 23mm f1.4
Thanks so much 😊🙏 I will mark it down in case I have a request for Fuji.
How do you capture the screen of the gfx50r?
Here is my video on the recording setup: ruclips.net/video/VmV6dlpGxKc/видео.html
happy new year, where is that comparison between the nikon 35 f1.8s and this wonderful Fuji 23mm f1.4. The latter seems really to play above its level.
The video is not made yet, still in my list 😊👌🏼 stay tuned
@@caliallstaring thanks for your dedication
Which of the two cameras is the best choice for street photography?
X-T4 should be better for street, lighter.
GFX handle much better black collar. All in all cameras are very good,
Good photographer can use any camera and you just proved that
Thank you so much 😊
I love the magic of Fujifilm's digital medium format.
Thanks for watching 😊🙏🙏
try to compare in low light conditions and in landscape foto
Thanks for sharing your suggestions 🙏
You are the best
Thanks 😊
honestly i think the x-t4 looks better, dno if its just me, or the lens, or what
Thanks for sharing your insights 😊🙏
That X-T4 ain’t no hoe! I love it! Can’t really tell a difference honestly.
Thank you for watching 😊🙏
The main difference between MF and APS-C (or FF) is that you have to slow down with a MF. And at the end, you don't go back home with the same pictures. That's without speaking of the dynamic range or the flexibility a size of sensor x4 gives you. However, this XT4 is a very good camera and Fuji has very great lenses in both format. But it's neither for the same purpose nor for the same photographe.
Thank you for sharing your insights 😊🙏
Stu
Stunning always
🙏
They are both lenses with no character. I have the GF50 3.5 and although it's stunningly sharp, it has no soul. The out of focus rendering is good, but boring. Anyone looking for a lens to use on personal projects to create art then adapt Zeiss lenses. Don't pay so much money for the GF lenses.
Thanks for sharing your insights 🙏