We're showing Jungle Cruise in Atmos at the cinema I work at and a scene about halfway into the movie (is that the rapids sequence you were referring to?) has some incredibly intense bass, with the low frequency rumble felt outside of the theater even. (Edit: went to verify it a couple of days ago, this is indeed the rapids scene)
Funny irony, your speach/vocals were somewhat lower than normal. Was that a planned joke because of your initial comments about Disney? Or were you just speaking slightly lower than normal?
All I have is a soundbar and I thought the sound was amazing! Loved the machine gun firing effects the most. Very surprised to hear Metallica in a Disney movie.
I dont have a top of the line tv vizio m series 2019 but definitely seen some better 4k presentations for sharpness and vivid color. I agree soft a lot with sharpness here and there but colors and hdr were definitely gorgeous many times though. 8.2 is a good rating I think.
Dont know if it's just me or it is very dark and mirky the background is. I tried the non hdr is also mirky but much brighter and more colorful. Black widow on the other hand the hdr is very good. The non hdr and the hdr version almost have the same brightness.
I wish Disney was like HBO Max. One price, you watch all the service has to offer & get WB movies that are in theaters. I subbed to Disney+ early on. Then they raised their price. Then they added "premier access". If they didn't acquire the Star Wars or Marvel IP they would be acting different.
I think they modeled the cat after the animatronic for a fantastical feel vs pushing the realism that they could of done. A few people in our viewing party questioned that and said it took them out of the movie a bit.
SHANE: In your experiences reviewing streaming movies, are the 4k discs noticeably better than streaming? Do you have other people watch both versions (in your theater)? My question is more in the audio aspect vs video. Most people I have watch both versions of the movie can't tell the difference. Perhaps people notice the difference in your theater.
absolutely if u take any streaming service audio is streamed at 964kbps but when u take a blue ray its audio is streamed at around 9mbps so now you know how much audio is compressed in streaming
@@Vinothmanick thanks for the response. I am aware of the differences between compressed audio & non compressed. My question wasn't clear & I'm going to edit it. When I watch a movie, I hear it more than view it. I'm a retired audio engineer. I completely notice the difference in audio but family members don't.
@@Vinothmanick they don't. I have a nice theater but it's not quite the level of Shane's. I was wondering if he noticed a big difference (I assume he has a good ear), and if others noticed a difference. Maybe with his equipment, others might notice a difference (even if they don't have an ear). It boggles my mind when people can't hear the difference. I buy 4k blu-rays just because the audio is OUTSTANDINGLY better.
I guess you'll have to include me as one of those "grain haters." If I'm going to spend $25 and up for a 4K movie I want a razor sharp picture and what the marketing promised, "4X the sharpness of 1080p." For me, I avoid 4K movies that were shot photochemically in 35MM because the grain ruins the picture quality.
The detail is in the grain but whatever. I hate DNR and I hate movies shot on digital cameras. All these movies shot on digital get 2k masters no matter what they were shot at 90 percent of the time. With that being said you are entitled to your opinion and I am not arguing with you, I just wanted to give my take since it is the complete opposite of what you stated.
@@a-v-karin7617 I don't have a problem with differing opinions. But you lost me when you said "the detail is in the grain." That doesn't make any sense to me since you lose detail with a grainy picture. If you like the grain that's great, for me it's incredibly annoying. Like I stated earlier when I buy a 4K movie I expect ZERO grain and a razor sharp picture (or at least as close as possible,) and you can only get that on movies that are shot digitally.
@@cosmo1505 when I said the detail is in the grain I meant with footage shot on 35mm etc. Of course grain on digitally shot pictures looks atrocious. I was just stating that I prefer my movies shot on film. I like the look of some digital movies like bad boys for life for example. I think pacific rim was digitally shot so that would be another one although it is a stunningly beautiful 2k upscale. What are a few digitally shot movies you would recommend as reference?
@@cosmo1505 "the detail is in the grain." As grain is the texture of the film the picture was taken on, there are fine details there. Details such the texture of the clothing, pores and wrinkles of the skin. When using DNR to try to remove the grain those details also get lost. Think about Shane's statement of Emily Blunt's face looking waxey. Those are the details in the grain. I am an old fart and I grew up with movies having a certain look. So I am A-OK with classics on 4K seeing grain and all.
@@jjchmiel78 My problem with grain is that I watch movies on a 135" screen with a laser projector and sometimes the grain is magnified to the point of the movie almost unwatchable. A perfect example is the movie 300, love the movie but the grain was absolutely horrible. In my opinion you can't have "fine details" because the grain takes away rom the sharpness, but I'm glad you enjoy it and that's what matters most. If you did a side by side comparison of the movies 300 and Passengers you'll understand what I mean.
We're showing Jungle Cruise in Atmos at the cinema I work at and a scene about halfway into the movie (is that the rapids sequence you were referring to?) has some incredibly intense bass, with the low frequency rumble felt outside of the theater even.
(Edit: went to verify it a couple of days ago, this is indeed the rapids scene)
Funny irony, your speach/vocals were somewhat lower than normal. Was that a planned joke because of your initial comments about Disney? Or were you just speaking slightly lower than normal?
Beautiful movie....can’t wait for the physical release
Great review as always Shane thank you!
I'm shocked! A Disney release with actual Atmos Objects...😱
Maybe Hell has frozen over and I haven't noticed?
I think more likely that Frozen has hell'd over... 😁
Just watched it, fun movie.. kind of tomb raider/Indiana jones, and it looked great and soundtrack was engaging. Dialogue was very clear.
thanks Shane!
We all love a good bottom.
Yes we do Sir mix a lot :)
Looking forward to checking this out on disc!
Pretty soft lol mage in places, audio was ok but you really need to crank it
Watched this movie last nite picture and sound was fantastic movie was a good watch to
All I have is a soundbar and I thought the sound was amazing! Loved the machine gun firing effects the most.
Very surprised to hear Metallica in a Disney movie.
Thank you for all the reviews and letting us know and see the Atmos visualizer
I’ll see this if I get chance to go cinema or when it comes to free Disney+
Day one pickup 👍
Just watched this this Afternoon good movie
Could you review Fantasia (1940) from the Disney + stream to see if the video and audio are good. check that movie out.🤩🤩🤩🤩
I dont have a top of the line tv vizio m series 2019 but definitely seen some better 4k presentations for sharpness and vivid color. I agree soft a lot with sharpness here and there but colors and hdr were definitely gorgeous many times though. 8.2 is a good rating I think.
I will rent this out
Dont know if it's just me or it is very dark and mirky the background is. I tried the non hdr is also mirky but much brighter and more colorful. Black widow on the other hand the hdr is very good. The non hdr and the hdr version almost have the same brightness.
I thought that the Dolby atmos was incredible and it looks incredible in 4K by Disney might wait to get the disc and great review as always Shane
Wen u pay 💰 for premiere access on Disney how long do u have access to the movie 🍿
30 days. And then usually free for all on Disney+ eventually
for as long as your subscribed to disney +
You can have it free now if you want.
I wish Disney was like HBO Max. One price, you watch all the service has to offer & get WB movies that are in theaters. I subbed to Disney+ early on. Then they raised their price. Then they added "premier access". If they didn't acquire the Star Wars or Marvel IP they would be acting different.
Saw this today. The most impressive disney stream till date. Atmos was really good.
any chance you will be reviewing Fast9?
Pirates is soo much better. Not even a convo
Watched it last night, great for young kids.
I think they modeled the cat after the animatronic for a fantastical feel vs pushing the realism that they could of done. A few people in our viewing party questioned that and said it took them out of the movie a bit.
Yeah l agree, l doubt it was intentional, just poor cgi
Still smells new!
Good summer blockbuster fun
i will wait for 4k disc
Good 👍
SHANE: In your experiences reviewing streaming movies, are the 4k discs noticeably better than streaming? Do you have other people watch both versions (in your theater)? My question is more in the audio aspect vs video. Most people I have watch both versions of the movie can't tell the difference. Perhaps people notice the difference in your theater.
absolutely if u take any streaming service audio is streamed at 964kbps but when u take a blue ray its audio is streamed at around 9mbps so now you know how much audio is compressed in streaming
@@Vinothmanick thanks for the response. I am aware of the differences between compressed audio & non compressed. My question wasn't clear & I'm going to edit it. When I watch a movie, I hear it more than view it. I'm a retired audio engineer. I completely notice the difference in audio but family members don't.
@@doublet147 luckily you have a audiophile ear but sadly they don’t 😬 apologies if iam wrong
@@Vinothmanick they don't. I have a nice theater but it's not quite the level of Shane's. I was wondering if he noticed a big difference (I assume he has a good ear), and if others noticed a difference. Maybe with his equipment, others might notice a difference (even if they don't have an ear). It boggles my mind when people can't hear the difference. I buy 4k blu-rays just because the audio is OUTSTANDINGLY better.
@@doublet147 😂😂👌🏻👍🏻
Hi Shane!
Are we tired of the rock?
I guess you'll have to include me as one of those "grain haters." If I'm going to spend $25 and up for a 4K movie I want a razor sharp picture and what the marketing promised, "4X the sharpness of 1080p." For me, I avoid 4K movies that were shot photochemically in 35MM because the grain ruins the picture quality.
The detail is in the grain but whatever. I hate DNR and I hate movies shot on digital cameras. All these movies shot on digital get 2k masters no matter what they were shot at 90 percent of the time. With that being said you are entitled to your opinion and I am not arguing with you, I just wanted to give my take since it is the complete opposite of what you stated.
@@a-v-karin7617 I don't have a problem with differing opinions. But you lost me when you said "the detail is in the grain." That doesn't make any sense to me since you lose detail with a grainy picture. If you like the grain that's great, for me it's incredibly annoying. Like I stated earlier when I buy a 4K movie I expect ZERO grain and a razor sharp picture (or at least as close as possible,) and you can only get that on movies that are shot digitally.
@@cosmo1505 when I said the detail is in the grain I meant with footage shot on 35mm etc. Of course grain on digitally shot pictures looks atrocious. I was just stating that I prefer my movies shot on film. I like the look of some digital movies like bad boys for life for example. I think pacific rim was digitally shot so that would be another one although it is a stunningly beautiful 2k upscale. What are a few digitally shot movies you would recommend as reference?
@@cosmo1505 "the detail is in the grain." As grain is the texture of the film the picture was taken on, there are fine details there. Details such the texture of the clothing, pores and wrinkles of the skin. When using DNR to try to remove the grain those details also get lost. Think about Shane's statement of Emily Blunt's face looking waxey. Those are the details in the grain. I am an old fart and I grew up with movies having a certain look. So I am A-OK with classics on 4K seeing grain and all.
@@jjchmiel78 My problem with grain is that I watch movies on a 135" screen with a laser projector and sometimes the grain is magnified to the point of the movie almost unwatchable. A perfect example is the movie 300, love the movie but the grain was absolutely horrible. In my opinion you can't have "fine details" because the grain takes away rom the sharpness, but I'm glad you enjoy it and that's what matters most. If you did a side by side comparison of the movies 300 and Passengers you'll understand what I mean.
Loved seeing Emily Blunt's feet, good stuff!
Foot fetish ???
@@xo3336 apparently...lol