The problem is we always blame others or the system rather than the parenting. We put so much emphasis on accepting people's disgusting ways rather than being clear on right and wrong or actions and consequences.
I know it has nothing to do with this topic and you were just mentioning it off the cuff, but I would LOVE to hear you talk more about habeus corpus. I know it's a really important thing in our criminal justice system, and I think I understand what it means, but why does it matter? What would happen without it?
This is the problem with such legislation… it can’t. Also social media platforms may remove animal rescue channels and pages, farming, zoos, and legitimate reporting of animal cruelty for fear of prosecution.
I stand to be corrected, as I haven't looked into it in any great detail, but I'm always sceptical when governments enact laws for our "safety". Helping remove illegal content quicker is fine, CSAM or animal abuse etc, I have zero issues with that (obviously!). But do we really believe that this won't be used to enforce more censorship of speech? I hope I'm wrong, but somehow I think that this is exactly what this will be used for.
I love your content but you cant advocate for freedom of speech and expression and then be for a bill that means a company can be fined for what online communications it allows on its platform. The UK has shown itself incapable of fairly determining what is 'harmful' in balance with actual freedom of speech
The problem is we always blame others or the system rather than the parenting. We put so much emphasis on accepting people's disgusting ways rather than being clear on right and wrong or actions and consequences.
I know it has nothing to do with this topic and you were just mentioning it off the cuff, but I would LOVE to hear you talk more about habeus corpus. I know it's a really important thing in our criminal justice system, and I think I understand what it means, but why does it matter? What would happen without it?
The woman kicking the horse is one that I hope stays up. It will be a constant reminder of what not to do.
This is the problem with such legislation… it can’t. Also social media platforms may remove animal rescue channels and pages, farming, zoos, and legitimate reporting of animal cruelty for fear of prosecution.
I stand to be corrected, as I haven't looked into it in any great detail, but I'm always sceptical when governments enact laws for our "safety". Helping remove illegal content quicker is fine, CSAM or animal abuse etc, I have zero issues with that (obviously!). But do we really believe that this won't be used to enforce more censorship of speech? I hope I'm wrong, but somehow I think that this is exactly what this will be used for.
Nice silhouette, purposeful?
Actually, yes! Tried one with sun behind, one with sun into face. Do think that worked better visually. Although then had more wind noise.
@@loc4725 Yeah. I'll keep the light from the front for future ones.
@coachhousechambers2047 but I do like the videos from different locations rather than a studio.
I love your content but you cant advocate for freedom of speech and expression and then be for a bill that means a company can be fined for what online communications it allows on its platform. The UK has shown itself incapable of fairly determining what is 'harmful' in balance with actual freedom of speech