Gianni Andreotti May Allah bless you and protect you and guide you to His right path. You may enjoy watching yusuf estes really an amazing guy that make you happy watching his video, good luck
Brother inshaAllah your Islam going to grow stronger and stronger, But you have to go to a masjid or to a group of Muslim to take your shahada and teach more and stay in touch with u
@Art Hur how can you say religion doesn't make sense or have logic then use the word hell right after? That is illogical. The concept of hell comes from religion, folklore, mythologies, which according to you doesn't make sense or have logic. Now you must ask yourself, who is the actual stupid one?
Susan Maxim are you kidding me ?! A Muslim can never disrespect Jesus Chris or any other messenger or a prophet of God because we believe in all of them ( peace be upon them all) , anyone who would disrespect them wouldn't be a Muslim; Allah says in the Quran: { The Messenger has believed in what was revealed to him from his Lord, and [so have] the believers. All of them have believed in Allah and his angels and his books and his messengers, [ saying] , we make no distinction between any of his messengers. " And they say, " We hear and we obey. [ We seek ] forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [ final ] destination." } Translation of the meaning of Quran ( 2:285) . And it's one of the sixth pillars of faith to believe in all of Allah's messengers. Please keep watching this channel and DUS Dawah channel to know more about Islam. I wish you the best 💕🌷
The Legendary Outdoorsman The Truth does not change time to time.Only a lie does.We are not here to entertain the People..You convey to the people the same truth you related to the one before...
My point is the salafis manhaj is consistent and goes back to the phrophet becuase basically we are just repeating everything down the line alhamdulilah.. I’m not sure which point of my comment you didn’t comprehend.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
@Art Hur You reek of incest DNA if only ur parents was not siblings i guess you could be more useful in life your value is as equal as an ant according to ur athiesm...but since ur parents were siblings i guess u r even worst.
Jundullah desi means Pakistani and Indian men. First of. Second I agree with you we are all one ummah so that’s why I got upset with him talking about the sister like that. Who are we to judge anyone being Muslim or non Muslim.
12:46 "Everything you told me makes logical sense" What a straightforward guy, just straight up admits everything Shamsi said is logical. No games, no word play, no BS. May Allah guide him, amen. So now he has a choice, to follow the one logical belief or follow some other illogical belief. All his stuff at 15:35 "Someone could argue against your points" doesn't mean they can argue against them successfully. Is that person going to be honest that argues with Shamsi? Are they going to ask loaded questions and make emotional appeals to convince others? That's the problem, they either do something underhand like that or they accept what Shamsi says as they recognize it as truth. There is no one that can successfully argue with the truth and that your logic recognizes it should be a sign to you to use what you've been given. I love that Allah tells us to use our intellect and it's sad when humans say things like I don't use logic in my belief...how can a human, a being that operates with logic toss it to the side for something the person is claiming is so important like our eternal resting place?
Onething people can't deny is their neutral inclination which is what islam is based on he immediately understood the verse " so now am in trouble😂 why did u tell me " bcs everything he was told made sense n the verse was prove. May Allh guide him 💗
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
The first prophecy needed more justice done to it. It was not just that there will be rivers and gardens in the future from the deserts of the Arab peninsula but they will "become rivers and forests like they used to be". We know through modern Geography and science that the Arab peninsula was a lush green land full of water and plants and trees. This was hundreds of thousands of years ago so the Prophet Mohammed (SAWS) could only have known that via divine knowledge.
@@JonathanDeLeon-em4px Well what if I told you it's the other way around, bible lacks lots of characteristics necessary for a book to be holy namely, christian scholars states that they don't even know who are the real authors of the bible lol (who is luke, jhon, mark etc..) and it has been changed countless times that it has now dozens of versions unlike the Qur'an which hasn't been changed from the time it has been revealed(1400 yrs ago). Also, the concept of the Trinity which is a fundamental belief in Christianity hasn't been mentioned 'til 300 years after the death of Jesus(pbuh) how come nobody believed in the trinity in the 1st century after the death of Jesus(pbuh), at least ppl believed in the Tawheed at the time of Mohammed(SAW) when he preached the message.
@Tel Aviv I know you're here to argue but I can't even entertain your ignorance. the 1st one takes some explaining but the second, all you have to do is simply read. you won't get another reply. Ask the God of Abraham for guidance
I liked the religious discussion at this park , different people expressing and sharing there way of belief .. you can not do this in third world countries like India , Pakistan etc..
‘Third world’ as in once the richest but has since had all its good shit stolen from a murderous bunch of hooligans. You are right there though mate, we aren’t like you, but it’s probably coz we’re different, which I know u don’t like, but It’s amazing how untrustworthy people can be once they’ve been raped and pillaged. So don’t blame it all on us yeah. Cheers
@Gray Kin He said in third world countries you can't preach freely and openly. He did not mention Israel or any first or second world countries which deny ppl basic freedoms like the freedom to travel to work and school. You didn't get what he was saying.
I really enjoyed listening to this BarakAllahu Feek. I do not have the patience for dealing with some of the extremely argumentative people that go to Speakers Corner (like Hatun). The kid in this video seemed like he was willing to listen and did not use harshness against Shamsi out of arrogance. May Allah guide the kid. Shamsi spoke very well and brought very good, easy to understand points in a clear and concise manner. May Allah grant many blessings upon Shamsi and increase his knowledge of Deen.
Islam for those who seek their God..however too bitter to tell the truth..sure, Allah SWT will always with you brothers..those who are on the path of truth..
@Lance Gin if you look at the majority of Christians compared to Muslims today, then you'd see who's clearly following the path that the creator wanted us to. Jesus is very important to us, Very. However, the creator is more important, we don't bow down 5 times a day to man. No. We bow down to the one and only true creator that Abraham did.
@Lance Gin Satan cannot be the author of the Qur'an and I will tell you why, the Qur'an clearly curses countless times Satan, and tells us to get away from him, and to seek refuges from Satan, it is impossible for a demon to write a book that keeps cursing him and insulting him all the time
@Tel Aviv Hahahah u just made my day with u stupid interpretation lol 😂 if u just read the verses that are before this verse u well know that the Surah talks about the man “ the human being “ not the sperms as u saying 😂 And the second one I really don’t need to reply because it’s clearly saying “APPEARS TO HIM ” have a good one And study more 😉
Art Hur Don’t cry you dirty dog! Who are to wipe Islam??? Hahaha many have tried and failed! NOT ONE SINGLE ONE OF YOU DOGS CAN STOP IT! EVER! IT WILL BE IN EVERY HOUSE HOLD!
Art Hur Hahahaha making up utter stupidity again! Why do you lie to yourself and others???? Islam truly is the most beautiful religion. Just because you cannot stop your backwards way of life don’t stop others!
So beautiful bro. May God bless your effort to follow t footstep of every prophet send by God to remain mankind of worship , submit their will to one & only true God. Aaminx3
May Allaah guide and preserve Shamsi ameen. How many try and teach people to learn about the Creator and the Hereafter and not be heedless about death? Surah Mulk 67:2 We need to know in which state to die to start living our lives properly.
Hi my dear brother, Matt , I am very glad to read your nice comments I sincerely request you to embrace Islam , so that you may get eternal peace happiness and success both in this world and in the eternal world hereafter May Allah bless you , my dear brother
first of all I really liked the conversation and how you explained Islam to him, keep up the good work! and also am I the only person who thinks that the asian guy looks like Mark lee from nct????
About 60 years ago science truly concluded that the universe was infinite ♾...they felt so confident in debunking the Quran Al Kareem. Today, they know that there was a beginning, therefore it was created. Science is *NOT* absolute but Allah’s SWT is!! Alhamdulilah, for this gift of Islam.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Ma Sha Allah..... watching this video made me so happy .. brother shamsi may God bless you . and the American brother too may God bless you and whose you ... ameen
Shamsi missed a trick when the gentlemen mentioned that books tend to have discrepancies through time especially if it was written by man, although Shamsi did explain how the Quran been memorized, yet with that example, he only scratched the surface when it comes to showcasing how the Quran was preserved. He could have further showcased with many examples in the scientific study of language ie; "linguistics" how can a human author volume of words in a speech format without being written at first nor edited, be produced in increments for a span of 23 years and not find a single grammatical mistake nor a style change. Furthermore, showcasing deeper examples and ingenuity of word positioning supported and viewed through a mathematical lens to deliver superiority and command in the speech itself! For instance, the Baqara chapter has 286 verses and in one verse it says "We've made you into a middle nation" and since the word "middle" is used it was placed in the middle of the actual chapter at verse 143! remember now, this was delivered in a speech, not in written format by a man who could not read nor write. This is one of many linguistic examples in the Quran that will make sit up and ask a very simple question "Can someone actually speak like that?" Truly some mind-boggling stuff! "Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy." [Qur'an 4:82]
And then when the creators of salaf-us-salih WILL be all stood at the gates of hell he be behind them. May Allah SWT keep him away from all salafis and only guide him to Islam of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) and help him please Allah Pak
Why do so called salafis never have nothing good to say anybody who doesn't profess to be salafi I once invited a salafi couple to my house for dinner the first thing I didn't like was the fact that his wife went to my bookshelf and start looking to see whether or not the authors were salafi scholars or muftis I worked in a bookstore for over 5 yrs because she didn't know some of the scholars we knew she told my wife not to take dawah from that person I said I'm gonna take knowledge from anyone who's following the minhaj of prophet Muhammad and his companions and I said doesn't that make me a salafi he said yes then I said why do I have to say that I'm a salafi you making it sound like a sect and prophet Muhammad saw said to stay away from sects so I'm just happy with saying I'm just a Muslim following the sunna of prophet Muhammad they were the best of mankind and they never called themselves salafis anyways that ended our friendship they have a habit of running ppl away from Islam I never see anyone taking shahada from them giving dawah .
Beautiful advise from the Shaykh Al ‘Allaamah 'Abdul 'Azeez Ibn Baaz (rahimullah).. It was said to the shaykh, “Oh shaykh, so and so has become misguided”. The Shaykh replied: “Perhaps his deviation was due to two things: 1. He didn’t ask Allâh for Ath-thabaat (firmness). 2. He didn’t thank Allâh for Al-Istiqaamah (steadfastness) So when Allâh chose for you the path of guidance, it was not because you are special, nor was it because of your obedience. But rather, it was a mercy from Him that enveloped you. He can remove it from you at any time. Therefore, do not be deceived by your actions nor by your worship. And do not look down upon the one who has deviated from His path. For had it not been due to His mercy, you would have been in his position. Repeat the recitation of this verse while pondering: ﴿ ولوﻵ أن ثبتناك لقد كدت تركن إليهم شيئا قليلا ﴾ "Had We not made you firm (Oh Muhammed صلى الله عيه وسلم) then you would have inclined towards them slightly.” So upon is to not to think that thabaat (firmness) upon Al-Istiqaamah (steadfastness) is due to your own personal achievements. Ponder over His statement (Ta'aalaa) to the best of mankind: “Had We not made you firm (Oh Muhammad صلى الله عيه وسلم).” So how about you? We are greatly mistaken when we disregard and pay no attention to our athkaar (supplications of remembrance). We believe it to be something that is not important and we forget that Allâh preserves us with it. And perhaps the decree will change… Ibnul-Qayyim says: “The need of the servant in his supplications by which he seeks refuge [in Allah], is more severe than his need for food, drink and clothes!” Be consistent in your athkaar (supplications of remembrance), so that you can encompass the meaning: “Preserve Allâh, He will preserve you.” Fortify [yourselves] every morning and evening [with your athkaar (supplications of remembrance)]. For the dunya (life of this world) is horrifying and full of surprises and Allâh is the protector of His servants. ● Shaykh Abdul ‘Aziz bin Baaz Majmoo al Fatawa (297\4)
Amir...just wanna share some information. Is your birth date according to modern calender or the hijri calender? Google ur birth date n convert to hijri..and thats ur true birthday date.
I love my brother Shamsi for the sake of Allah. In my opinion, he is the most sincere brother in the park. May Allah hold him firm upon the truth and increase him in knowledge. The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: “Aim to do good and do what you can. Do your duties early in the day or in the afternoon, or at night, and be moderate, and you will succeed.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6463) and Muslim (2818).
WE CAN ALSO GIVE THEM THE THE PROOF THAT THAT IT IS IN QURAN THAT THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH IS LIKE A EGG ,WHO CAN SAY THAT 140 YRS BACK ,AS IT IS PROVED ONLY FEW YRS AGO BY SOME SCIENTIST
May Allah guide him. Straightforward and honest guy. Islam makes sense to him but he said he doesn’t care about religious doctrine. So it has satisfied his mind, and In Sha Allah it will enter his heart too and he’ll accept it.
There is no God except Allah most Gracious Most Merciful he is one and only Allah. Each and every single human beings return to him oniy. He has all the power.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Shansi is doing very good thing and inshallah he will be rewarded with great best things in this world and after this world tooo inshallah ,love u brother lot's of love and respect to u and also to ur team for this all things u all are doing ,keep it up ! 👍🏼,love from india I love ur videos brother ❤🇮🇳👍🏼🆗
Brothers and Sisters, Asalamu Alaykum. I want to purchase a book on the life of the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) and also a book on all the battles. Which book do you guys recommend I purchase.
@@DiscoverALLAH7777777 that book has the prophet saw biography and the battles! Thank you will purchase Inshallah! May Allah reward in this life and next!
عبدالرحمن Ameen..It goes in deptg even with the days if ignorance dating back pre-islam and also the geneology of the 3 Arab Types of the Extinct Arabs of Aa'd and Tha'mud,the pure Arabs and the Ishmaelite Arabicised ones.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Salafiyyah IS Islam. It is Islam according to the Qur'an & Sunnah & according to the understand of the Salaf. We summarise all of that by saying "Salafiyyah". The Prophet, sallallahu 3laihi wasalam, used various terms to describe (specific) groups from the Ummah who will traverse upon the correct methodology, Ta'ifatul Mansurah, al Ghuraba, Firqatun-Najiyah, etc. In fact we are following the Salaf by using these very terms. The Sahaba and Salaf used terms Ahlus-Sunnah, Ashabul hadith, etc. Furthermore, Shaykhul Islam ibn Taymiyah said its obligatory to accept (not reject) the ascription to the Salaf BY CONSENSUS. Ijma (consensus) is a one of proofs we use alongside the Quran and Sunnah to establish Beliefs, Acts of Worship and Principles. And lastly, ALL the Scholars of the Ummah who are alive or have passed away recently accept this term fully encourage its use when it is required. So yes, may Allah guide this Brother to Salafiyyah - the Islam of the Salaf. Not the (false ascription) to 'Islam' of the Muslim Brothers (al-ikhwan), nor the Islam of the khawarij, Sufis, Shia, etc. etc. This may help you: www.wahhabis.com/articles/emndqhc-ibn-taymiyyah-obligatory-to-accept-ascription-to-the-way-of-the-salaf.cfm
Yes, but may Allah guide him to the (Correct Creed), i.e. the Islam of the Prophet, sallallahu 3laihi wasalam and His Companions, in other words 'Salafiyyah'!
Alhamdulilah. We need more brothers do dakwah work like brother Shamsy. Inshallah May Allah blesses brother towards Jannah. Inshallah. Glad this Asian guide sounded he is a broad minded person. May Allah show him to the path towards Islam. Inshallah.
I think he appeals to the westerners better without one lol, epically with all their preconceived notions about people with beards. Anyways many people have beards but are rotten in the heart. Something like that shouldn't matter akhi.
Allah has blessed this Arab brother with knowledge MaShaAllah, seems it was very difficult to explain in a crowd. Keep inviting people to the truth before they leave the world. 👏 May Allah grant you a huge reward my brother.
Oh come on brother @Tel Aviv nowhere in the Qur'an was it said that the sperm is made in the chest. Read those verses in context. Verse 5 asks man to contemplate what he was created from. Verse 6 said man was created from a jetting fluid. Verse 7 then refers back to man as being issued from between the loin and the breastbones. Tell me, where else is the location of a baby in its mom if not between the ribs and the loin? What got you confused is the pronoun used there. Unlike English, Arabic does not have different pronouns for "it" and "he". "Yakhruju" is an Arabic phrase that can mean either "he comes out" or "it comes out". Why then did you choose "it" rather than "he" (which is the original subject of the verses) As for the sun setting in a murky water, if you read carefully and honestly, you'd find out that the sun is not the subject of the verse, rather Zul-qarnain is, which is why it makes sense. You should see that the whole set of verses are perspectival in the sense that they relate the sun-setting event from Zul-qarnain's point of view, which will be the perspective of anyone standing in front of an ocean. "Wajadaha" is an Arabic phrase that means "HE found it", which means "it appeared to HIM
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
what i like about the asians people taht they really understand that we have two ears and one mouth to listen more than talk, big respect for them i really like them
shamsi is one of my favorite dawah speakers. knows how to handle talking paticne and humility very clear.. i really wish i have this ability inshaallah.
Br Shamsi is a excellent speaker. May Allah Swt give him the best of health. I love watching his vids. MashaAllah a beautiful smile. Alllah bless him n his family. Aameen.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!! MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS: Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages." 2. Why genealogies of Joseph? Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David. Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus. The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David. The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required. Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children. This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
its nice n respect of him to put the word prophet of the name of prophet Muhammad pbuh, not just say Muhammad like other non muslim did, may Allah give him guidance to the rite path, Aaaammmminnn
Doubting Christianity is not a weakness, it’s a blessing from God. He’s showing you the true Way that can only be attained by worshipping alone and stop believing in the crucifixion and what is attributed to it.
@@thehourglassfan3515 Islam makes hundreds of false and stupid claims and wants us to throw away our wisdom and take those lies for truth - that is the problem. We do not love liars, and muslims do lie, even to themselves.
I am Sicilian living in Sicilia and I see very much Islam videos and now I say Ashado an la ilah il Allah Muhammad RasolAllah
May Allah protect you and grant tawfiq(success) & make u from amongst the people of sunnah( way of the prophet Muhammad pbuh)
Gianni Andreotti May Allah bless you and protect you and guide you to His right path. You may enjoy watching yusuf estes really an amazing guy that make you happy watching his video, good luck
Brother inshaAllah your Islam going to grow stronger and stronger,
But you have to go to a masjid or to a group of Muslim to take your shahada and teach more and stay in touch with u
welcome and el hamdoullah brother ♥️ now all you have to do brother is go to imam and will teach how to pray and inchallah
Islam was the religion of your ancestors, we are delighted to have you back.
This Asian brother is very intelligent. Inshallah he will be guided to the straight path.
ameen
@Art Hur how can you say religion doesn't make sense or have logic then use the word hell right after? That is illogical. The concept of hell comes from religion, folklore, mythologies, which according to you doesn't make sense or have logic. Now you must ask yourself, who is the actual stupid one?
@Art Hur "or have a logic" lol seems you don't have logic bro
InshAllah
@Art Hur I wonder if there is anything in that brain of yours that is actually sincere
Much respect for him for being honest and willing to learn .
jazaakallahu khayran, please remember to hit the like button & share this video to your friends & family and share on all your social media platforms.
I agree with you I listen to the hole think I have no problems with Muslims but when they are rude about Jesus then I'm angry
Susan Maxim are you kidding me ?! A Muslim can never disrespect Jesus Chris or any other messenger or a prophet of God because we believe in all of them ( peace be upon them all) , anyone who would disrespect them wouldn't be a Muslim; Allah says in the Quran: { The Messenger has believed in what was revealed to him from his Lord, and [so have] the believers. All of them have believed in Allah and his angels and his books and his messengers, [ saying] , we make no distinction between any of his messengers. " And they say, " We hear and we obey. [ We seek ] forgiveness, our Lord, and to You is the [ final ] destination." } Translation of the meaning of Quran ( 2:285) . And it's one of the sixth pillars of faith to believe in all of Allah's messengers. Please keep watching this channel and DUS Dawah channel to know more about Islam. I wish you the best 💕🌷
@@monitoot thank you I'm sorry if I was rude I live in Muslim home I love them as my own respect Allah too so sorry
Susan Maxim oh dear you're rude😊you're just misinformed, may Allah guide us all to what he loves and pleases him 💕🌷
Our dawah is so simple alhamdulilah and people might claim shamsi always repeating himself,well that’s how you teach people!!
The Legendary Outdoorsman The Truth does not change time to time.Only a lie does.We are not here to entertain the People..You convey to the people the same truth you related to the one before...
مكتبة السنة
Whats ur point?
My point is the salafis manhaj is consistent and goes back to the phrophet becuase basically we are just repeating everything down the line alhamdulilah.. I’m not sure which point of my comment you didn’t comprehend.
The Legendary Outdoorsman
JazakAllahu khayraa
I think islam is a copy of Judaism and Christianity. That's why it came later. Its the last religion. Think about it
Shamsi always got that beautiful speech man. Would love to hear the dawah in person. So simple yet powerful reminders
@Art Hur What? Who is the idiot here, the one who expresses his opinion genuinely, or the one who is insulting someone bc of his opinion?
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
This guy is maskeen walahi, May allah azawajal guide him and us all on the straight path .
@Art Hur Yeah because the earth just magically popped out of nowhere??
Art Hur can you even spell cause I got an aneurysm trying to read that. May Allah guide you and peace and blessing of Allah be upon Muhammad :)
@@shenol369 Ameen
@Art Hur You reek of incest DNA if only ur parents was not siblings i guess you could be more useful in life your value is as equal as an ant according to ur athiesm...but since ur parents were siblings i guess u r even worst.
Why are you calling hum a maskeen? Does he look like a maskeen to you? Ask for forgiveness for what you just said
I like this Asian brother. I wish I was so humble and honest and straight forward like him.
Sky Walker it's your choice to be like that
Brother..are you Muslim...btw
Brother shamsi is good human being..sunnah 4ever💟💝💖
Maryam bosna fear allah and conceal your beauty that ALLAH has given u from the world sister
Aria Khan what’s wrong with you ? Who are you to judge her ? No wonder all the women hate desi guys. You guys have no clue how to act towards women.
Aria Khan looooool why u changing your comment fool
Jundullah desi means Pakistani and Indian men. First of. Second I agree with you we are all one ummah so that’s why I got upset with him talking about the sister like that. Who are we to judge anyone being Muslim or non Muslim.
Maryam bosna Kako si beautiful?
12:46 "Everything you told me makes logical sense"
What a straightforward guy, just straight up admits everything Shamsi said is logical. No games, no word play, no BS. May Allah guide him, amen.
So now he has a choice, to follow the one logical belief or follow some other illogical belief. All his stuff at 15:35 "Someone could argue against your points" doesn't mean they can argue against them successfully. Is that person going to be honest that argues with Shamsi? Are they going to ask loaded questions and make emotional appeals to convince others? That's the problem, they either do something underhand like that or they accept what Shamsi says as they recognize it as truth. There is no one that can successfully argue with the truth and that your logic recognizes it should be a sign to you to use what you've been given. I love that Allah tells us to use our intellect and it's sad when humans say things like I don't use logic in my belief...how can a human, a being that operates with logic toss it to the side for something the person is claiming is so important like our eternal resting place?
islam is first class .. from dubai
@Pete Kondolios spread hate more we are still standing, your non sense biased statements won't change anything, but Islam will change people
@Pete Kondolios jihad means hard work, effort, it's an Arabic word u ignorant fool
@Pete Kondolios stop embarrassing yourself here, ur so lame
@Pete Kondolios what, read history mate
@Pete Kondolios you just described the westerns loot after the wars 😂
Onething people can't deny is their neutral inclination which is what islam is based on he immediately understood the verse " so now am in trouble😂 why did u tell me " bcs everything he was told made sense n the verse was prove. May Allh guide him 💗
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Thats was a very nice discussion brother shamsi , may allah reward you and guide the American guy ameen
Brother Shamsi may Allah bless you
@Art Hur الله يهديك
Aameen ya Rabal Aalameen
shamsi is on of the most sincere speaker, I salute him!!!
18:00 best part "oh man why'd you tell me?!" 😂
bashscrazy I came to watch it next time just for this best moment😅...
he realize the meaning of shamsi statement very quick he is a smart guy, I hope he will soon choose the correct path to follow in his life...💚💚
His reaction was quick 😂
Yes he understood fast what some muslims dont even realize...
i laughed so much hahah
The first prophecy needed more justice done to it. It was not just that there will be rivers and gardens in the future from the deserts of the Arab peninsula but they will "become rivers and forests like they used to be". We know through modern Geography and science that the Arab peninsula was a lush green land full of water and plants and trees. This was hundreds of thousands of years ago so the Prophet Mohammed (SAWS) could only have known that via divine knowledge.
The Asian guy is a very smart person
He's not smart if he gets fooled into Islam.
@@JonathanDeLeon-em4px Wdym
@@aminelahnin837 Anyone who converts to Islam lacks sound judgment. They have not studied the Bible, history or science to know any better.
@@JonathanDeLeon-em4px Well what if I told you it's the other way around, bible lacks lots of characteristics necessary for a book to be holy namely, christian scholars states that they don't even know who are the real authors of the bible lol (who is luke, jhon, mark etc..) and it has been changed countless times that it has now dozens of versions unlike the Qur'an which hasn't been changed from the time it has been revealed(1400 yrs ago). Also, the concept of the Trinity which is a fundamental belief in Christianity hasn't been mentioned 'til 300 years after the death of Jesus(pbuh) how come nobody believed in the trinity in the 1st century after the death of Jesus(pbuh), at least ppl believed in the Tawheed at the time of Mohammed(SAW) when he preached the message.
@@JonathanDeLeon-em4px what do u have say bout that
I’m glad that he sees that Islam makes perfect sense but that’s not enough, he now needs to accept it. May Allah guide him
yes subhanallah if allah in the end only allah can chang his heart
give him time to learn. insyaallah he will accept islam
the friend and gift analogy to Allah swt had me get out my seat. Alhamdulillah! may Allah increase brotha rank in paradise insha'Allah ✊🏿
@Tel Aviv I know you're here to argue but I can't even entertain your ignorance. the 1st one takes some explaining but the second, all you have to do is simply read. you won't get another reply. Ask the God of Abraham for guidance
I liked the religious discussion at this park , different people expressing and sharing there way of belief .. you can not do this in third world countries like India , Pakistan etc..
inshallah brother I do agree that UK is a great country
‘Third world’ as in once the richest but has since had all its good shit stolen from a murderous bunch of hooligans. You are right there though mate, we aren’t like you, but it’s probably coz we’re different, which I know u don’t like, but It’s amazing how untrustworthy people can be once they’ve been raped and pillaged. So don’t blame it all on us yeah. Cheers
@Gray Kin He said in third world countries you can't preach freely and openly. He did not mention Israel or any first or second world countries which deny ppl basic freedoms like the freedom to travel to work and school. You didn't get what he was saying.
You are right
India is Shit country myself from India here politicians are retarded
If you are inteligent and you studied science , you must be a muslim , mashallah islam is the knoweledge religion
I really enjoyed listening to this BarakAllahu Feek. I do not have the patience for dealing with some of the extremely argumentative people that go to Speakers Corner (like Hatun). The kid in this video seemed like he was willing to listen and did not use harshness against Shamsi out of arrogance. May Allah guide the kid. Shamsi spoke very well and brought very good, easy to understand points in a clear and concise manner. May Allah grant many blessings upon Shamsi and increase his knowledge of Deen.
Hatun's voice in my nightmares
Quran and Sunnah upon the understanding of the salaf us-saleh
Subhanallah! May Allah swt guide him to the right path Aameen
@Tel Aviv open your mind! Islam is very clear
@Tel Aviv not only to me but to almost 2 billion people worldwide. And still growing
@Tel Aviv are you taking about Cristian? Because they are living the cristianity not Muslims are living. And you know it very well?
Islam for those who seek their God..however too bitter to tell the truth..sure, Allah SWT will always with you brothers..those who are on the path of truth..
@Lance Gin if you look at the majority of Christians compared to Muslims today, then you'd see who's clearly following the path that the creator wanted us to. Jesus is very important to us, Very. However, the creator is more important, we don't bow down 5 times a day to man. No. We bow down to the one and only true creator that Abraham did.
@Lance Gin Satan cannot be the author of the Qur'an and I will tell you why, the Qur'an clearly curses countless times Satan, and tells us to get away from him, and to seek refuges from Satan, it is impossible for a demon to write a book that keeps cursing him and insulting him all the time
Bruh Lance "gin" only Muslims will get this 😂
@@mrmu3448 these people are in every comment . they try so hard to show islam is wrong
May Allah guide him and us
@Tel Aviv Hahahah u just made my day with u stupid interpretation lol 😂 if u just read the verses that are before this verse u well know that the Surah talks about the man “ the human being “ not the sperms as u saying 😂
And the second one I really don’t need to reply because it’s clearly saying “APPEARS TO HIM ”
have a good one
And study more 😉
ISLAM SUNNIS FOREVER!!!!!
Islam forever would have sufficed but your secterian slogan made it lose value
Just be a Muslim. Don’t label yourself a Sunni, Shia...
@Art Hur lol
I was Hindu
Only religion made sense to was Islam
Art Hur Don’t cry you dirty dog! Who are to wipe Islam??? Hahaha many have tried and failed! NOT ONE SINGLE ONE OF YOU DOGS CAN STOP IT! EVER! IT WILL BE IN EVERY HOUSE HOLD!
Art Hur Hahahaha making up utter stupidity again! Why do you lie to yourself and others???? Islam truly is the most beautiful religion. Just because you cannot stop your backwards way of life don’t stop others!
This is a good work This dawah work of PROF Muhammed SAW (PBUH) if a person do this dawah work he can sucess like Sahaba ikram 👌
So beautiful bro. May God bless your effort to follow t footstep of every prophet send by God to remain mankind of worship , submit their will to one & only true God. Aaminx3
This young man is smart and humble may God guide him 🤲🏻
mashaAllah, a wonderful discussion. May Allah guide him, guide Shamsi, guide me & all the rest of our brothers & sisters in Islam. Amen.
Aww may Allah guide him
May Allaah guide and preserve Shamsi ameen. How many try and teach people to learn about the Creator and the Hereafter and not be heedless about death? Surah Mulk 67:2
We need to know in which state to die to start living our lives properly.
Masha’Allah brother Shamsi, this was beautifully done!
May this brother be guided to Islam insha'Allah :) he seemed very interested.
jazaakallahu khayran, please remember to hit the like button & share this video to your friends & family and share on all your social media platforms.
I am not Muslim but I love watching shamsi. He seems very knowledgeable and a good Muslim
That's so good to hear! Are you a Christian yourself?
@@30251 yea sorta. My family are all Christian. I'm not super into it , I'm interested in what different people believe. ✌
Hi my dear brother,
Matt ,
I am very glad to read your nice comments
I sincerely request you to embrace Islam , so that you may get eternal peace happiness and success both in this world and in the eternal world hereafter
May Allah bless you , my dear brother
Zaki Ibrahim May Allah give your courage to come forward as a Muslim and follow the truth when you see it
Aww may Allah guide him to this beautiful deen ameen
Bro both had good conversation
@Tel Aviv hahaha don't cry .
first of all I really liked the conversation and how you explained Islam to him, keep up the good work!
and also am I the only person who thinks that the asian guy looks like Mark lee from nct????
About 60 years ago science truly concluded that the universe was infinite ♾...they felt so confident in debunking the Quran Al Kareem. Today, they know that there was a beginning, therefore it was created. Science is *NOT* absolute but Allah’s SWT is!! Alhamdulilah, for this gift of Islam.
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Ma Sha Allah..... watching this video made me so happy ..
brother shamsi may God bless you . and the American brother too may God bless you and whose you ... ameen
Shamsi missed a trick when the gentlemen mentioned that books tend to have discrepancies through time especially if it was written by man, although Shamsi did explain how the Quran been memorized, yet with that example, he only scratched the surface when it comes to showcasing how the Quran was preserved.
He could have further showcased with many examples in the scientific study of language ie; "linguistics" how can a human author volume of words in a speech format without being written at first nor edited, be produced in increments for a span of 23 years and not find a single grammatical mistake nor a style change. Furthermore, showcasing deeper examples and ingenuity of word positioning supported and viewed through a mathematical lens to deliver superiority and command in the speech itself! For instance, the Baqara chapter has 286 verses and in one verse it says "We've made you into a middle nation" and since the word "middle" is used it was placed in the middle of the actual chapter at verse 143! remember now, this was delivered in a speech, not in written format by a man who could not read nor write.
This is one of many linguistic examples in the Quran that will make sit up and ask a very simple question "Can someone actually speak like that?"
Truly some mind-boggling stuff!
"Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy." [Qur'an 4:82]
May Allah guide him and his likes to Islam upon the methodology of the salaf-us-salih ameen
And then when the creators of salaf-us-salih WILL be all stood at the gates of hell he be behind them. May Allah SWT keep him away from all salafis and only guide him to Islam of Prophet Muhammed(pbuh) and help him please Allah Pak
@@beardedbloke2521 who are you to dictate where anyone will end up? that's between the creator and the creation alone.
Ali Waii where dictate that?
Why do so called salafis never have nothing good to say anybody who doesn't profess to be salafi I once invited a salafi couple to my house for dinner the first thing I didn't like was the fact that his wife went to my bookshelf and start looking to see whether or not the authors were salafi scholars or muftis I worked in a bookstore for over 5 yrs because she didn't know some of the scholars we knew she told my wife not to take dawah from that person I said I'm gonna take knowledge from anyone who's following the minhaj of prophet Muhammad and his companions and I said doesn't that make me a salafi he said yes then I said why do I have to say that I'm a salafi you making it sound like a sect and prophet Muhammad saw said to stay away from sects so I'm just happy with saying I'm just a Muslim following the sunna of prophet Muhammad they were the best of mankind and they never called themselves salafis anyways that ended our friendship they have a habit of running ppl away from Islam I never see anyone taking shahada from them giving dawah .
Thats a causal fallacy. And Salaf didn't call themselves Salafi because they were the Salaf, it's in the name come on.
Shamsiiii ... Love u my brooo ❤️
May Allah bless , protect you guys who work for the rise of Islam
Beautiful advise from the Shaykh Al ‘Allaamah 'Abdul 'Azeez Ibn Baaz (rahimullah)..
It was said to the shaykh,
“Oh shaykh, so and so has become misguided”.
The Shaykh replied:
“Perhaps his deviation was due to two things:
1. He didn’t ask Allâh for Ath-thabaat (firmness).
2. He didn’t thank Allâh for Al-Istiqaamah (steadfastness)
So when Allâh chose for you the path of guidance, it was not because you are special, nor was it because of your obedience. But rather, it was a mercy from Him that enveloped you. He can remove it from you at any time.
Therefore, do not be deceived by your actions nor by your worship. And do not look down upon the one who has deviated from His path. For had it not been due to His mercy, you would have been in his position.
Repeat the recitation of this verse while pondering:
﴿ ولوﻵ أن ثبتناك لقد كدت تركن إليهم شيئا قليلا ﴾
"Had We not made you firm (Oh Muhammed صلى الله عيه وسلم) then you would have inclined towards them slightly.”
So upon is to not to think that thabaat (firmness) upon Al-Istiqaamah (steadfastness) is due to your own personal achievements. Ponder over His statement (Ta'aalaa) to the best of mankind: “Had We not made you firm (Oh Muhammad صلى الله عيه وسلم).”
So how about you?
We are greatly mistaken when we disregard and pay no attention to our athkaar (supplications of remembrance). We believe it to be something that is not important and we forget that Allâh preserves us with it. And perhaps the decree will change…
Ibnul-Qayyim says:
“The need of the servant in his supplications by which he seeks refuge [in Allah], is more severe than his need for food, drink and clothes!”
Be consistent in your athkaar (supplications of remembrance), so that you can encompass the meaning:
“Preserve Allâh, He will preserve you.”
Fortify [yourselves] every morning and evening [with your athkaar (supplications of remembrance)]. For the dunya (life of this world) is horrifying and full of surprises and Allâh is the protector of His servants.
● Shaykh Abdul ‘Aziz bin Baaz
Majmoo al Fatawa (297\4)
Wonderful exposition and antidote against Pride
الله يحفظك شمسي ويطول في عمرك للنشر الإسلام.
I respect this Asian dude and his intellect, his curiosity is what will bring him to the truth in sha Allah
The asian boy is so respectful mashallah hé need a friend on his side like shamsi to believe in the truth, thank u shamsi my brother Allah i hafdik
It’s my birthday. Great upload enjoying dawah
Amir...just wanna share some information. Is your birth date according to modern calender or the hijri calender? Google ur birth date n convert to hijri..and thats ur true birthday date.
His birthday is his birthday.
I love my brother Shamsi for the sake of Allah. In my opinion, he is the most sincere brother in the park. May Allah hold him firm upon the truth and increase him in knowledge.
The Messenger of Allah (Peace be upon him) said: “Aim to do good and do what you can. Do your duties early in the day or in the afternoon, or at night, and be moderate, and you will succeed.”
Narrated by al-Bukhaari (6463) and Muslim (2818).
WE CAN ALSO GIVE THEM THE THE PROOF THAT THAT IT IS IN QURAN THAT THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH IS LIKE A EGG ,WHO CAN SAY THAT 140 YRS BACK ,AS IT IS PROVED ONLY FEW YRS AGO BY SOME SCIENTIST
This is a mistranslation it doesn’t mention egg it mentions earth is spread out
May Allah guide him. Straightforward and honest guy. Islam makes sense to him but he said he doesn’t care about religious doctrine. So it has satisfied his mind, and In Sha Allah it will enter his heart too and he’ll accept it.
ماشاء الله هنيا لكم
I hope I can work in dawah
Om Ayah Yahya
me too 😢😢
The best job in the world is DA'I
I am muslim in Indonesia..
ALLAHUAKBAR☝️
im palestine i love muslim from indonesia👍❤
Alhamdullilah, I love Indonesian people❤
Name 1person that has memorized the Bible
Zakir Naik
Looool
Sheikh Ahmed Deedat, may Allah have mercy on his soul.
@@mohdzairikamaruddin1526 LOL
Zakir Naik revised all the religious books and he chose Islam
There is no God except Allah most Gracious Most Merciful he is one and only Allah. Each and every single human beings return to him oniy. He has all the power.
Ma Sha Allah, Love this Brother....
New sub sunni guy so lovely
Islam makes sense to anyone with an open heart. Allah will guide them. Islam emphasises on logic and reason that leads to faith. May Allah guide him😊🌹
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
soennah for ever
Brother shamsi may Allah continue to bless u for ur teachings,ma shaa Allah,from Nigeria
Bob the builder, Godwin and Hatun disliked this video.
this three terrify shamsi to death
Shansi is doing very good thing and inshallah he will be rewarded with great best things in this world and after this world tooo inshallah ,love u brother lot's of love and respect to u and also to ur team for this all things u all are doing ,keep it up ! 👍🏼,love from india I love ur videos brother ❤🇮🇳👍🏼🆗
Brothers and Sisters, Asalamu Alaykum. I want to purchase a book on the life of the Prophet Muhammad(SAW) and also a book on all the battles. Which book do you guys recommend I purchase.
The Sealed Nectar is a good one snd recommended with accordance to the Salafi Da'weh...
@@DiscoverALLAH7777777 that book has the prophet saw biography and the battles! Thank you will purchase Inshallah! May Allah reward in this life and next!
عبدالرحمن
Ameen..It goes in deptg even with the days if ignorance dating back pre-islam and also the geneology of the 3 Arab Types of the Extinct Arabs of Aa'd and Tha'mud,the pure Arabs and the Ishmaelite Arabicised ones.
عبدالرحمن
Check salafibookstore.com
Go to the Salafi bookstore online
Wow Alhumdulillah!!! Brother Shamsi was amazing here this day!!!!
There is no gods beside GOD.
smart dude, not full of himself, genuine dude, and isn't clouded by misconceptions. May Allah guide him to the right path.
may allah guided him to truth bath inshallah
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
May Allah Guide Him To Salafiyyah
مكتبة السنة may Allah swt guide him to Islam and away from your hizbiyyah. Ameen
May Allah guide them to Islam and the way of following true Islam. The way the Shahaba followed Islam. The way of the Salaf. ❤
Salafiyyah IS Islam. It is Islam according to the Qur'an & Sunnah & according to the understand of the Salaf. We summarise all of that by saying "Salafiyyah". The Prophet, sallallahu 3laihi wasalam, used various terms to describe (specific) groups from the Ummah who will traverse upon the correct methodology, Ta'ifatul Mansurah, al Ghuraba, Firqatun-Najiyah, etc. In fact we are following the Salaf by using these very terms. The Sahaba and Salaf used terms Ahlus-Sunnah, Ashabul hadith, etc. Furthermore, Shaykhul Islam ibn Taymiyah said its obligatory to accept (not reject) the ascription to the Salaf BY CONSENSUS. Ijma (consensus) is a one of proofs we use alongside the Quran and Sunnah to establish Beliefs, Acts of Worship and Principles. And lastly, ALL the Scholars of the Ummah who are alive or have passed away recently accept this term fully encourage its use when it is required. So yes, may Allah guide this Brother to Salafiyyah - the Islam of the Salaf. Not the (false ascription) to 'Islam' of the Muslim Brothers (al-ikhwan), nor the Islam of the khawarij, Sufis, Shia, etc. etc.
This may help you:
www.wahhabis.com/articles/emndqhc-ibn-taymiyyah-obligatory-to-accept-ascription-to-the-way-of-the-salaf.cfm
Yes, but may Allah guide him to the (Correct Creed), i.e. the Islam of the Prophet, sallallahu 3laihi wasalam and His Companions, in other words 'Salafiyyah'!
*islam.
My brother your Team is working very well...
Shamsi always mentions the example of the qur'an and give Chinese as example but this, it wasn't the case. 😂😂😂
Yh, I noticed that one, lol.
Lol I was waiting for him to say say “memorizing a book in Chinese “but he said in arabic lol 😂
So to me
I thought about it too. I thought he would be using the Russian language as example instead.
2manyusernamestaken
Asalamu alaikum
He uses hikmah when giving dawah
I also was thinking which language will he use because he can't say Chinese 😂
Alhamdulilah. We need more brothers do dakwah work like brother Shamsy. Inshallah May Allah blesses brother towards Jannah. Inshallah. Glad this Asian guide sounded he is a broad minded person. May Allah show him to the path towards Islam. Inshallah.
Brother Shamsi, needs a beard.
I think he appeals to the westerners better without one lol, epically with all their preconceived notions about people with beards. Anyways many people have beards but are rotten in the heart. Something like that shouldn't matter akhi.
Elisjon Goseni He does not shave it...You keep what Allah gave to you of the beard...Some people cannot grow long beards..
I know. That's why I said it. He need one.
Elisjon Goseni he cant grow one he already said it last weeks video. Some people can’t grow it
very good explanation Brother Shamsi. barak allah fik
interesting m8
Mr McDonald
This is one of the best channels in speakers corner
Mr McDonald you eat a lotta McDonalds?????
hbk711x I don’t have an issue with what I look like, if you do then don’t look at my profile picture
XD i like ur picture tbh
Mr McDonald think about ur health
Well done bro shams may Allah reward you with Janah
Allah has blessed this Arab brother with knowledge MaShaAllah, seems it was very difficult to explain in a crowd. Keep inviting people to the truth before they leave the world. 👏 May Allah grant you a huge reward my brother.
Allah does not exist.
George Then wait..! I promise you a surprise and the most regretful day ahead of you. From which there is no turning back.
@@user-ok9gy2pc1v Yes, yes. moron - you idiot think there is life after death, ha ha ha ha ha, brainless fool.
George haha 😂 I want to know who is the dumb person that gave you a phone 🥱😒
Nice to see Adam Sandler spreading Islam.
I love the way Shamsi uses the phrase "logic dictates"
Oh come on brother @Tel Aviv nowhere in the Qur'an was it said that the sperm is made in the chest.
Read those verses in context. Verse 5 asks man to contemplate what he was created from. Verse 6 said man was created from a jetting fluid. Verse 7 then refers back to man as being issued from between the loin and the breastbones. Tell me, where else is the location of a baby in its mom if not between the ribs and the loin?
What got you confused is the pronoun used there. Unlike English, Arabic does not have different pronouns for "it" and "he". "Yakhruju" is an Arabic phrase that can mean either "he comes out" or "it comes out". Why then did you choose "it" rather than "he" (which is the original subject of the verses)
As for the sun setting in a murky water, if you read carefully and honestly, you'd find out that the sun is not the subject of the verse, rather Zul-qarnain is, which is why it makes sense. You should see that the whole set of verses are perspectival in the sense that they relate the sun-setting event from Zul-qarnain's point of view, which will be the perspective of anyone standing in front of an ocean. "Wajadaha" is an Arabic phrase that means "HE found it", which means "it appeared to HIM
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
Love this brother for the sake of Allah
Very simple but powerful message with smile
what i like about the asians people taht they really understand that we have two ears and one mouth to listen more than talk, big respect for them i really like them
this Asian guy is very polite & smart
Masha Allah brother shamsi may Allah subhana wata'ala bless you
MashaAllah 👌🙌🙏
shamsi is one of my favorite dawah speakers. knows how to handle talking paticne and humility very clear.. i really wish i have this ability inshaallah.
He lies without shame. Before someone who knows what to answer, he is... zero, sincerely.
Br Shamsi is a excellent speaker.
May Allah Swt give him the best of health.
I love watching his vids. MashaAllah a beautiful smile. Alllah bless him n his family.
Aameen.
Brother shamsi used really a good logic
Brotjer Shamsi always tell this example and every time i hear is new and unique
@Tel Aviv MATTHEW AND LUKE DISAGREE!!!
MORE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE BIBLE AKA THE WORD OF GOD ACCORDING TO CHRISTIANS:
Matthew and Luke give two contradictory genealogies for Joseph (Matthew 1:2-17 and Luke 3:23-38). They cannot even agree on who the father of Joseph was. Church apologists try to eliminate this discrepancy by suggesting that the genealogy in Luke is actually Mary's, even though Luke says explicitly that it is Joseph's genealogy (Luke 3:23). Christians have had problems reconciling the two genealogies since at least the early fourth century. It was then that Eusebius, a "Church Father," wrote in his The History of the Church, "each believer has been only too eager to dilate at length on these passages."
2. Why genealogies of Joseph?
Both the genealogies of Matthew and Luke show that Joseph was a direct descendant of King David. But if Joseph is not Jesus' father, then Joseph's genealogies are meaningless as far as Jesus is concerned, and one has to wonder why Matthew and Luke included them in their gospels. The answer, of course, is that the genealogies originally said that Jesus was the son of Joseph and thus Jesus fulfilled the messianic requirement of being a direct descendant of King David.
Long after Matthew and Luke wrote the genealogies the church invented (or more likely borrowed from the mystery religions) the doctrine of the virgin birth. Although the virgin birth could be accommodated by inserting a few words into the genealogies to break the physical link between Joseph and Jesus, those same insertions also broke the physical link between David and Jesus.
The church had now created two major problems: 1) to explain away the existence of two genealogies of Joseph, now rendered meaningless, and 2) to explain how Jesus was a descendant of David.
The apostle Paul says that Jesus "was born of the seed of David" (Romans 1:3). Here the word "seed" is literally in the Greek "sperma." This same Greek word is translated in other verses as "descendant(s)" or "offspring." The point is that the Messiah had to be a physical descendant of King David through the male line. That Jesus had to be a physical descendant of David means that even if Joseph had legally adopted Jesus (as some apologists have suggested), Jesus would still not qualify as Messiah if he had been born of a virgin - seed from the line of David was required.
Women did not count in reckoning descent for the simple reason that it was then believed that the complete human was present in the man's sperm (the woman's egg being discovered in 1827). The woman's womb was just the soil in which the seed was planted. Just as there was barren soil that could not produce crops, so also the Bible speaks of barren wombs that could not produce children.
This is the reason that although there are many male genealogies in the Bible, there are no female genealogies. This also eliminates the possibility put forward by some apologists that Jesus could be of the "seed of David" through Mary.
alhamdou lillah, may allah guides you, protect you, and lead to the right path. welcome to islam brother
هءا الاسياوي جد ذكي.. ماشاء الله عليه ومحاوره شمسو كذلك الله يبارك عليه.. ارجو من الله ان يكون شبلا في الاسلام
Brother shamsi may Allah aza wa zhal be pleased with you brother
Subhanallah.. well explained..
When you search about Islam, you will find that it is the religion of truth that addresses reason and logic
its nice n respect of him to put the word prophet of the name of prophet Muhammad pbuh, not just say Muhammad like other non muslim did, may Allah give him guidance to the rite path, Aaaammmminnn
Doubting Christianity is not a weakness, it’s a blessing from God. He’s showing you the true Way that can only be attained by worshipping alone and stop believing in the crucifixion and what is attributed to it.
True way? Like flat earth and sun setting in murky water? Whom do you want to fool?
George Do you think that Christianity make sense?
@@thehourglassfan3515 Nope, but what does it have to do with islam?
George I mean if you’re doubting something that is not true, then nothing wrong with you.
@@thehourglassfan3515 Islam makes hundreds of false and stupid claims and wants us to throw away our wisdom and take those lies for truth - that is the problem. We do not love liars, and muslims do lie, even to themselves.
الله أكبر ، والحمد لله
الله يبارك فيك اخي شمسي
Very good work.....keep it all my disbeliever brothers.....stay with us in heaven............not in hell with iblees...
insha'Allah.,
@@George-iv1hi and boys ? i mean everybody knows in islam is men with men not allowed so wtf you talking about use you brain
Macha allah those da3iyas will never stop impressing me