Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.

ReVox B215 vs Nakamichi CR 4E

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 янв 2018
  • Cassette -maxel metal

Комментарии • 56

  • @rmle23
    @rmle23 11 месяцев назад +3

    Revox rules,nothing more to say!
    Build like a tank and sounds awesome.

    • @TTVEaGMXde
      @TTVEaGMXde 10 месяцев назад

      This comparison is without Dolby C. I prefer the SONY CX20188 Dolby C IC over the Hitachi HA12058.

  • @ovi_4
    @ovi_4 2 года назад +5

    To me, the Revox is a clear winner here. Nice comparison by the way. Tnx.

  • @gixxerboy555
    @gixxerboy555 Год назад +4

    Nak CR-4 is famous for it's awesome sound-quality..it's also an high end deck like his brothers..the CR-7 , ZX-7 , ZX-9 and Dragon.(the sound is even higher than the specified.. 21khz).I have the ZX-7 ..,CR-4 and 5 other Nakamichi's..they all are insane sound-quality..even the basic' versions...

  • @garth56
    @garth56 4 года назад +13

    I've reviewed these two machines and the Dragon it's close but the Revox/Studer just has it in depth and more meat on the bones.. It always did

  • @PiotrWolny-rd4gp
    @PiotrWolny-rd4gp Год назад +2

    Revox wygrywa, więcej detali, jaśniejszy dżwięk. Revox!

  • @showstopperrob1097
    @showstopperrob1097 6 лет назад +14

    And now what? Sound on RUclips via a laptop is not the way to Judge.

  • @jon123423
    @jon123423 5 лет назад +10

    You might have to adjust the azimuth on Nak to gain better detail.

  • @pcallas66
    @pcallas66 4 года назад +6

    Just from what my ears hear from what I'm picking up from the speakers, I think the Revox sounds richer for sure. However, I'm not sure if there's a slight alignment issue between the two decks. The other question would be where was it recorded? I know this is no comparison, but I have a friend that had the really high end Nakamichi deck and it sounded like the azimuth didn't align with my Technics BR465 deck and his tapes sounded a little muffled in my deck. Prerecorded cassettes sounded correct in my Technics deck, too but a little off in his Nakamichi. I don't know if Nakamichi has their own alignment standard or not. When they're playing back their own recordings, there's no comparison. Anyway, thank you for sharing. You get a like from me.

  • @Zomby3000
    @Zomby3000 5 лет назад +5

    It is easy to explain the difference in sound quality - playback heads are not set at the same azimuth (it may be).

  • @Badassvidsz
    @Badassvidsz 4 года назад +6

    Revox is a BEAST DECK

  • @giuseppelavecchia775
    @giuseppelavecchia775 3 года назад +2

    Sono due registratori eccellenti,so cosa dico.li ho provati entrambi,e hanno un suono perfetto,tutti e due,lo garantisco io

  • @manuelginjas6711
    @manuelginjas6711 4 года назад +4

    Hi!
    Why are you recording a type IV Maxell tape with SX (Type I) selector ON? It affects BIAS level, recording EQ and recording level, because the EQ switch only changes part of the REC EQ and of course the playback EQ. For a correct REC EQ and BIAS, you should select the type IV (ZX) and 70uSec EQ. Ajust the BIAS and Level with the built in test and start the recording. A metal tape recording in such condition, sounds like crap...
    I assure you that the Nakamichi CR-4 responds with Type I,II and IV quality grade tapes from 15Hz to 23kHz at -20db +/- 3db. From 15Hz to 12kHz at 0db +/-3db , and 15Hz to 20kHz 0db +/- 3db, with Dolby C.
    It can sound worst than the Revox, but give it a chance...
    Best regards

  • @robotech3
    @robotech3 Год назад +1

    Those who choose revox are obviously brand fans. You are not giving a fair answer. listen carefully. nakamichi sounds more realistic. revox polishes the sound, it's a fake sound. JAPAN > german. i am a sony user but on cassettedeck "NAKAMICHI = cassettedeck god".

  • @janapra35
    @janapra35 4 года назад +6

    To my ears Revox sounds way better

  • @jarrahdrum
    @jarrahdrum Год назад +1

    In my opinion, The Revox has more weight to thee sound, it also looks cooler

  • @vdm54
    @vdm54 5 лет назад +3

    Любая исправная дека хорошо сыграет такую "музыку".
    Any good soundboard will play such "music" well.

  • @piotrdmochowski9150
    @piotrdmochowski9150 7 месяцев назад +1

    Revox👍

  • @erikkroll2154
    @erikkroll2154 3 года назад +2

    Something is wrong with the Nak. Mine sounds exactly like the source. I have a MR1.

  • @daroskor
    @daroskor 6 лет назад +6

    Revox wygrywa!!!

  • @fickfehler3866
    @fickfehler3866 3 года назад +3

    B215 much superior. German design superior to Japanese.

  • @fhussain44
    @fhussain44 5 лет назад +1

    It would be great if we can hear the line-out recording. You can get a hand-held tascam field recorder for quite cheap nowadays.

  • @thehunterofdeath2180
    @thehunterofdeath2180 4 года назад +1

    I don't know cus recorded is in RUclips think the revox is more deep bias n more real n solid depend the hook up cus my nakanishi sound really good when i thought it wow what a different from othet tape deck but im going to buy a revox for my collection

  • @shiitakestick
    @shiitakestick 3 года назад +2

    You’re shooting into a light source and the flare is washing out your blurry image , try wiping the vaseline off your lens.

  • @csabakereszturi945
    @csabakereszturi945 3 года назад +1

    Just by looking at these decks one can see that the Nakamichi is the real deal. Then the sound just floors the red fox.

  • @jonskitch8082
    @jonskitch8082 3 года назад +1

    Nakamichi sounds warmer but this is entry level version. Was this recorded on Revox? Buy ZX9, CR7 or Dragon, then compare!!!

    • @barthonhoff5547
      @barthonhoff5547 3 года назад +2

      A CR4 sounds as good as a CR7. Just missing the auto calibration and head adjustment. Both sound superior to a Revox 215.
      I’ve compared all three on a set of QUAD ESL 63.

  • @TheMagicStar80
    @TheMagicStar80 5 лет назад +2

    Revox B215 has exceptional recording quality and also playback however it requires high cost maintenance

  • @piotrdmochowski9150
    @piotrdmochowski9150 7 месяцев назад +1

    Miałem tego Revoxa i Technicsa rs-b100

  • @gixxerboy555
    @gixxerboy555 Год назад +1

    You should have released the eq-button earlier on the CR-4 and also don't use the Dolby when playing.(Dolby chokes the sound-richness)...

  • @Georgtt1968
    @Georgtt1968 3 года назад +2

    Revox is winer, for me.

  • @Henrydrn1
    @Henrydrn1 5 лет назад +4

    I was surprised, but the Nakamichi sounds more refined and "silkier" than the Revox.

  • @alexanderthomas542
    @alexanderthomas542 5 лет назад +4

    Prefer the nak... Revox sounds bright and brash but with more presence in the mid

  • @VIDSTORAGE
    @VIDSTORAGE 5 лет назад +1

    Tapes should be played back at normal bias only ..

  • @user-ei2yu3ui2w
    @user-ei2yu3ui2w 4 года назад

    Ну а кассета настолько голимая. И ещё выбор ставите на четвёртый тип. Или в этот корпус заправили, переставили др. плёнку?

    • @manuelginjas6711
      @manuelginjas6711 4 года назад

      Hello. You notice it too.The guy didn't slect the right position , and the BIAS adjust knob is at the lowest level. Ignorance is a bless...

  • @sunsan997
    @sunsan997 3 года назад +1

    ルボックスの方が音が太いが、ナカミチ CR-40は負けていない。私もCR-40持っているいるが、ボディの大きさの問題である。

  • @Anthony-cc8bx
    @Anthony-cc8bx 4 года назад +3

    Revox is CLEARLY better. Not even close.

  • @RoryMcDuff
    @RoryMcDuff Год назад

    Nakamichi all the way ...

  • @user-ei2yu3ui2w
    @user-ei2yu3ui2w 4 года назад +1

    У Накамичи, после первой перестановки, чуть уровень громкости показался ниже. Или , что заметил и повлияло на такое впечатление, это, что Ревокс резче играет, вырезано заполнение, а Накамичи спектром богаче, мягче. Это тут уже кому, что нравится.

    • @pepino1607
      @pepino1607  4 года назад

      Привет, это записано на ваш мобильный телефон. Звук отличается от реальности. Но это моя лучшая машина

  • @flyguy456thetechnicsking3
    @flyguy456thetechnicsking3 3 года назад

    Get Technics It Reigns Supreme.............

  • @bryanotero123
    @bryanotero123 6 лет назад +1

    Is it better than a niki dragon thou

  • @francis8062
    @francis8062 4 года назад +3

    Nakamichi sounds far away better.

  • @anod72a
    @anod72a 5 лет назад +3

    Nakamichi CR 4E!

  • @sunsan997
    @sunsan997 3 года назад

    ヘッドは比較にならない ナカミチ が遥かに上である。

  • @Xantylon74
    @Xantylon74 5 лет назад +4

    Revox sounds a bit better.

  • @sunsan997
    @sunsan997 3 года назад

    そもそも CR-40と比較が間違いである。680ZXと比較したら Revoxは負ける。

  • @musicisitall
    @musicisitall 3 года назад +1

    i had revox. revox sux

  • @litob1867
    @litob1867 5 лет назад +4

    revox is better....

  • @thehunterofdeath2180
    @thehunterofdeath2180 3 года назад

    Revox is the shit nakanishi is cool but the revox got no belt n sound much better to my hear i got two
    revox love them they are like a tank i got nakanishi RX 303 2 of them they got mess up both of them the tape deck is wierd got linemen that really suck it play whit belt i hate that now i need to fix my 2 nakanishi RX 303 is a cool tape deck you adjust the tape deck n that really suck it was hard to play it it got like a piece of metal i took it out it sound i put it back it sound n the sound leave that really crazy i bougth them cus they cool n sound good too but when i bought the 2 revox the sound was much better to me the nakanishi is louder but the revox is more clear n sound beutiful now i have to send my nakanishi to fix it sound when i take that metal the is in the head of the tape deck n that is weird i found a dude that fix all kind of tape deck so soon i send it to fix

  • @Statedaniel
    @Statedaniel 3 года назад +1

    Of course,Nakamichi will sound like shit! Have you'll seen any tape calibration performed to CR 4? I have heard cassette 40 years old AGFA stereochrome recorded on Nak! Boy,u cannot believe ears! So stop with Revox!

  • @alegvyazmin5589
    @alegvyazmin5589 4 года назад

    ReVox B215 лучше

  • @HamtaroEL
    @HamtaroEL 6 лет назад +1

    CR-4 > B-215