Glorious, has to be one of, if not the best videos I've seen and heard of the Hurricane. Had the volume turned way up, fantastic. Thank you for posting.
This particular aircraft is the only flying Hurricane that took part in the Battle of Britain. Apologies if somebody has already mentioned it. It bears repeating in any case.
Les commandes sont directes et ultra précises. Le pilote semble suivre les mouvements naturels de l' avion. Un atterrissage tout en douceur et à très basse vitesse. Superbe machine. Merci pour le partage.
Fond memories of the Mk IIA my father spent 3 decades restoring. He got to fly it for a while...until the cost to keep her was just too expensive. I grew up with this old gal and though seeing her fly...is sort of bitter sweet now.
Came across this vid researching my Hurricane kit build and it's fantastic - the controls seem so beautifully harmonised and the 'spade' grip joystick falls so readily to hand - I've always wondered about that.
Nothing more evocative as the sound of a Merlin going 'flat chat!. Thankyou to those that restored and keep this piece of history airworthy in memory of those who flew them!. Surprised the pilot was allowed to do low level flying. Perfect three pointer at the end!. Nuff said.
elizabeth taylor When I played MS Combat Flight Sim about 20 years ago we always chose the Hurricane as its turning circle was better than any other plane. We ended up going in circles until you were eventually behind your opponent. Not as fast as the Spitfire but could turn on a ticky.
it could compete with 109Es if provided with an altitude and speed advantage afforded by British coastal radar warning systems. For co-altitude interception I would prefer a Spitfire with its greater speed, competitive rate of climb, and superior medium and high speed handling.
My father flew "Hurri Bombers" from Manston in 1942. A Hurricane with a 250lb bomb under each wing flown at zero feet over the channel to France to beat up targets of opportunity. They lost a few so the RAF sent them up to 14,000 feet to dive bomb targets. All very hairy. He made it though with some close shaves including landing at Mansion with flaps shot out.
Rick, this is a FANTASTIC upload!! (Clearly, viewers are forgetting to Like.) It's SO good to see what the pilot is doing at the controls, & what effect his actions have on the aircraft. BRILLIANT!! Thank you! (I take it that you're a flight-simmer...?)
Bill1949 WT Not a flight simmer Bill, I'm ground crew for this aircraft. Glad you find the footage interesting. It's taken from the DVD entitled 'Hurricane R4118' by Peter Vacher.
....and she led onwards with Typhoon and Tempest which were ravishing the German war machine on the ground and in the air. Sidney Camm was a genius and every bit the saviour of Britain as was Reginald Mitchell. Rolls Royce eventually powered all of them.
Stewart Nicol History has a DVD about the hurricane that saved London it cashed in the city they got permission to up the street the by found some parts of the plane check it out maybe it's still for sale good luck Bruce
Yes. The Heinkels, Dorniers, and Junkers bombers employed during the Battle of Britain afforded very little protection for their crews, and cloud of .303 bullets might pepper the aircraft while massacring the crew. Additionally, the 109 E-1 and E-3 models in wide use at the beginning of the Battle of Britain were lightly armored and the pilot was vulnerable as were its radiators and fuel tanks
When the Polish and Czech pilots were allowed into the battle they had their machine guns synchronised to merge at 50 metres. They were all expert pilots and would happily fly in to close range to ensure their eight 303s tore the enemy out of the sky.
@@stewartnicol3028 the high muzzle velocity of the 303s would pretty much guarantee penetration of anything they hit at that range. It was a nasty, dangerous business, being a combat pilot in WW2. The 7.92mm MGs and 20mm cannons on the 109 were equally deadly.
Its not showing off. If you land them on the front wheels you can catch the propeller on the ground...ditto the Spitfire, so its a three point landing as first choice every time. The alternative often ended badly.
With a material shortage during the war why in the world did theft the rudder pedals on a pivot and a joint in the upper two thirds of the stick for a wheel! must be a thousand extra parts.
As an A&P in the US during the 80’s my shop worked on a lot of Hawker 125 business jets. What came to mind working on them was the English engineering mindset of why use one part when 10 will do the trick nicely.
@@JB-jo1pf Funny you should mention that. As an example I was assigned an early Hawker 600 to put a new right aileron counterweight in. It’s a mounded lead piece with little lugs that tend to break. When I unboxed the new parts I was floored. It was a raw casting with no holes drilled and not even machined to fit. I had to hand file it to fit. Took about 3 hours. Felt like working in a blacksmith shop.
Just hate the control sticks of the Hurricanes and Spitfires with the loops at the end, just not ergonomically right. Lacking of firepower in the 8 x .303 British MMGs arming the British frontline fighters is also was a disturbing fact. What were the British thinking then?
We were thinking about doing the job with what we had, and we did it. Don't criticize what you don't understand. You will never be called upon to do the job and everything is good in hindsight. We love our Hurricanes and Spitfires
Actually, with over 250 hours of flying with "the loop at the end", I found the ring to be very natural and easy to handle. You need to spend some time reading the history of aeroplane design and it will become crystal clear as why this was a front line fighter at that point in time. To give you a quick hint, look at the designs in 1918, then 1930, and then 1940. Roughly 10 years apart with huge leaps in design.
Glorious, has to be one of, if not the best videos I've seen and heard of the Hurricane. Had the volume turned way up, fantastic. Thank you for posting.
This particular aircraft is the only flying Hurricane that took part in the Battle of Britain. Apologies if somebody has already mentioned it. It bears repeating in any case.
Did it have any kills?
@@riazhassan6570 it had 5 confirmed kills from what i know
No sweat - it can NOT be repeated enough!
these planes won the air battle, not the spitfires
@@daveberry9922 indeed the hawkers do not get the credit they deserve!!!!
Les commandes sont directes et ultra précises. Le pilote semble suivre les mouvements naturels de l' avion. Un atterrissage tout en douceur et à très basse vitesse. Superbe machine. Merci pour le partage.
The best quality recording of a Merlin at work I have heard for some time.....with no camera shutters or commentary either. Lovely work my friend.
Excellent video.Great Aircraft and Great Merlin Music Thank you ,Regards Tony from Australia
Catagory *music* the sound of the engine is music to my ears😊
Fond memories of the Mk IIA my father spent 3 decades restoring. He got to fly it for a while...until the cost to keep her was just too expensive. I grew up with this old gal and though seeing her fly...is sort of bitter sweet now.
most impressed with the landing, that is how it's done, beautiful aircraft R4118.. well done everyone involved in keeping her flying.
Came across this vid researching my Hurricane kit build and it's fantastic - the controls seem so beautifully harmonised and the 'spade' grip joystick falls so readily to hand - I've always wondered about that.
Nothing more evocative as the sound of a Merlin going 'flat chat!. Thankyou to those that restored and keep this piece of history airworthy in memory of those who flew them!. Surprised the pilot was allowed to do low level flying. Perfect three pointer at the end!. Nuff said.
Superb sound recording! A must for headphones, I even closed my eyes for a while...
Some of the ace Battle of Britain pilots used to say , for a plane to fly in give me the spitfire, but for a plane to fight in give me the Hurricane .
elizabeth taylor When I played MS Combat Flight Sim about 20 years ago we always chose the Hurricane as its turning circle was better than any other plane. We ended up going in circles until you were eventually behind your opponent.
Not as fast as the Spitfire but could turn on a ticky.
@@OBCBTTB the spitfire was a better dog fighter.
it could compete with 109Es if provided with an altitude and speed advantage afforded by British coastal radar warning systems. For co-altitude interception I would prefer a Spitfire with its greater speed, competitive rate of climb, and superior medium and high speed handling.
@@thirstybonsai1888 Wrong
@@kevinthomas2662 er np
This is one sweet sounding bird. Looks to be an outstanding flyer as well. Great video.
Brilliant in every way.
I've always considered the Hawker Hurricane to be one of the most beautiful airplanes in thr world
Wow! Sheer and utter beauty
This is the Hurricane rescued in a derelict state outside a Tech college in India... I read the book, fascinating
What`s the book called please? I gotta read it too.
I saw the airplane when it was in that unflyable state so many years ago...
My father flew "Hurri Bombers" from Manston in 1942. A Hurricane with a 250lb bomb under each wing flown at zero feet over the channel to France to beat up targets of opportunity. They lost a few so the RAF sent them up to 14,000 feet to dive bomb targets. All very hairy. He made it though with some close shaves including landing at Mansion with flaps shot out.
One word.... beautiful!
9:25 oh that lucky person in the background who got to see this beauty in action... props to you, pun intended
Nice video production. 605 Sqn ... poor lads were nearly all wiped out in Malta.
Absolutely stunning piece of work. Well done - very engrossing filming and well put together. Will there be more? Please?
Rick, this is a FANTASTIC upload!! (Clearly, viewers are forgetting to Like.)
It's SO good to see what the pilot is doing at the controls, & what effect his actions have on the aircraft. BRILLIANT!!
Thank you! (I take it that you're a flight-simmer...?)
Bill1949 WT Not a flight simmer Bill, I'm ground crew for this aircraft. Glad you find the footage interesting. It's taken from the DVD entitled 'Hurricane R4118' by Peter Vacher.
Pilot flying in deck shoes, also a favorite of mine. They give excellent control feel.
Awesome flight thanks for sharing. :o)
Just ............. perfect.
....and she led onwards with Typhoon and Tempest which were ravishing the German war machine on the ground and in the air. Sidney Camm was a genius and every bit the saviour of Britain as was Reginald Mitchell. Rolls Royce eventually powered all of them.
This is the fighter that did win the Battle of Britain, Sydney Camms masterpiece. Take a good look and see how different it is to the Spitfire.
I love this plane....
好好聽的聲音…超級棒！Good!
A legend.
Queen of planes
One of the greatest planes.
Brilliant! Loved it.
The Hurricane never mind the Spitfire, the Hurricane took the Luftwaffe bombers apart.
Stewart Nicol History has a DVD about the hurricane that saved London it cashed in the city they got permission to up the street the by found some parts of the plane check it out maybe it's still for sale good luck Bruce
Stewart Nicol They also shot down more fighters than the spitfire during the Battle of Britain.
Yes. The Heinkels, Dorniers, and Junkers bombers employed during the Battle of Britain afforded very little protection for their crews, and cloud of .303 bullets might pepper the aircraft while massacring the crew. Additionally, the 109 E-1 and E-3 models in wide use at the beginning of the Battle of Britain were lightly armored and the pilot was vulnerable as were its radiators and fuel tanks
When the Polish and Czech pilots were allowed into the battle they had their machine guns synchronised to merge at 50 metres. They were all expert pilots and would happily fly in to close range to ensure their eight 303s tore the enemy out of the sky.
@@stewartnicol3028 the high muzzle velocity of the 303s would pretty much guarantee penetration of anything they hit at that range. It was a nasty, dangerous business, being a combat pilot in WW2. The 7.92mm MGs and 20mm cannons on the 109 were equally deadly.
The hawker hurricane has always been my favourite plane I’d love to fly one but that’s unlikely
Nicely Done
Not the top technology of the time but still the plane that downed the most of the enemy in the Battle of Britain. Nice video. Thanks.
What a amazing sound 😀
So the foot pedals are for steering on the ground?
It is a beautiful plane!
Very cool
The amount of g’s he’d be pulling is insane
I don’t know about this but the controls seem to so light and manageable
Spectacular in all regards
NIce performance for someone around 62 years old ;)
Great video, shame the aspect ratio isn't quite right.
Dir Sir! Do you know the name of the pilot who flew this hawker hurricane?
It looks like Stu Goldspink. I flew in a Spitfire with him a few weeks ago.
Check that landing out ......show off 😜😜
Its not showing off. If you land them on the front wheels you can catch the propeller on the ground...ditto the Spitfire, so its a three point landing as first choice every time. The alternative often ended badly.
@@timhancock6626 my remark was tongue-in cheek mate ....but what a fantastic video that was 👍please keep them up .
@@rosie121000 Others might not know that however.
P-51 Mustangs were probably the most well-balanced in terms of performance , speed, range and armaments.
Love this!!!
That guy is probably one of the luckiest pilots on Earth.
He flys a lot of Spitfires and Hurricanes.
With a material shortage during the war why in the world did theft the rudder pedals on a pivot and a joint in the upper two thirds of the stick for a wheel! must be a thousand extra parts.
Probably a lack of room in the cockpit as regards the joystick, best way of getting full movement without grazing knuckles.
As an A&P in the US during the 80’s my shop worked on a lot of Hawker 125 business jets. What came to mind working on them was the English engineering mindset of why use one part when 10 will do the trick nicely.
@@RMJTOOLS I have type ratings in the Hawker and 3 Falconjets. I know EXACTLY what you mean!
@@JB-jo1pf Funny you should mention that. As an example I was assigned an early Hawker 600 to put a new right aileron counterweight in. It’s a mounded lead piece with little lugs that tend to break. When I unboxed the new parts I was floored. It was a raw casting with no holes drilled and not even machined to fit. I had to hand file it to fit. Took about 3 hours. Felt like working in a blacksmith shop.
Very clever, those Brits !
I saw this plane when she was lying derelict ...
Just hate the control sticks of the Hurricanes and Spitfires with the loops at the end, just not ergonomically right. Lacking of firepower in the 8 x .303 British MMGs arming the British frontline fighters is also was a disturbing fact. What were the British thinking then?
We were thinking about doing the job with what we had, and we did it. Don't criticize what you don't understand. You will never be called upon to do the job and everything is good in hindsight. We love our Hurricanes and Spitfires
Actually, with over 250 hours of flying with "the loop at the end", I found the ring to be very natural and easy to handle. You need to spend some time reading the history of aeroplane design and it will become crystal clear as why this was a front line fighter at that point in time. To give you a quick hint, look at the designs in 1918, then 1930, and then 1940. Roughly 10 years apart with huge leaps in design.
Lucky the 19 olds in the 1940 could take off faster than that or you could speak german now