Dynamics - Implicit Time Integration

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 окт 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @AnythingETC
    @AnythingETC 3 года назад +1

    Thanks for your lecture! But there is a typo,,,
    In 8:26 14:00, you have to time delta_t at the end.
    Becuase V(+dt) = V(t) + [(1-beta)... + (beta)...] * "delta_t".
    It was a helpful lecture. Thanks Again!!!

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  3 года назад +2

      oops, yes 2nd eqn at these timestamps should have \Delta T after the square brackets. Hope the procedure was useful anyway.

  • @krokodilvomnil5327
    @krokodilvomnil5327 4 года назад +2

    Great video greetings from germany

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  4 года назад

      Glad it was useful. I just use YT for video hosting content for my own students, but always glad to hear if they're of use to others.

  • @RuinedCityGamer
    @RuinedCityGamer 2 года назад +1

    how do we get thoses constants to calculate a1 a2 a3 ... ?

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  2 года назад

      set \alpha = 0.25 and \delta = 0.5 (this will give constant average acceleration), \delta T is problem dependent - aim for 25 timesteps over the shortest period of interest

  • @pedrocalorio1655
    @pedrocalorio1655 2 года назад

    this is assuming that your dynamical system is linear and your M, K and D matrices does not change with time, correct?

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  2 года назад

      The time integration doesn't change for a nonlinear system, but you would need to incorporate an iteration loop to achieve convergence in an implicit scheme.

  • @sushankm7729
    @sushankm7729 3 года назад

    Could you please tell, where do we perform Newton-Raphson iterations in this implicit algorithm.

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  3 года назад

      This is just Newmark for time stepping linear problems only. You would need to have N-R loop inside of each time step for non-linear problems.

  • @cegie72
    @cegie72 5 лет назад +1

    Sir, what about Explicit time integration? Are you going to post a lecture about that topic?

    • @ProgrammedMechanics
      @ProgrammedMechanics  5 лет назад +1

      I hope to in the future, I have other priorities for courses at the moment. I'd definitely recommend the book 'Finite Element Procedures' by K J Bathe for details on how to implement these methods and restrictions on the time step size in explicit dynamics.

    • @cegie72
      @cegie72 5 лет назад +1

      @@ProgrammedMechanics Tank You a lot!

    • @joshalmaty
      @joshalmaty 3 года назад

      @@ProgrammedMechanics Just wanted to reiterate that I would really love to see a similar video on explicit! Thank you!

  • @kvasios
    @kvasios 2 года назад

    Richard Ayoade is this you?