Swarovski BTX EXPERT REVIEW

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 июн 2024
  • Welcome again to Optics4Birding, your go-to channel for in-depth reviews and insights into the world of optics!
    Today we're reviewing the SWAROVSKI BTX
    In this video we will discuss:
    VIEWING COMFORT: Learn how the dual-eyepiece configuration and ergonomic forehead rest make the BTX the easiest spotting scope to use for extended viewing sessions.
    PROS & CONS: Understand the advantages and disadvantages of the BTX when compared to singular eyepieces like the Swarovski ATX and STX.
    MODULARITY: Discover the versatility of the BTX and how it fits into the family of Swarovski Modular Spotting Scopes.
    👍 Support Our Channel:
    Give us a thumbs up and share this video with fellow birding and outdoor enthusiasts. Your support helps us continue to deliver quality content and keep you informed on the best tools to enhance your nature experiences.
    📣 We Want to Hear From You!
    Your feedback drives our content! Leave us a comment below with your thoughts on the Swarovski BTX or any products you'd like us to review in the future.
    Visit our website at: www.optics4birding.com/ for more information, or if you're interested in purchasing some new optics!
    Follow us on our social media platforms to be part of our growing community of optics enthusiasts:
    Instagram: optics4bird...
    Facebook: / optics4birding
    TikTok: / optics4birding
    Thank you for watching! :)
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 14

  • @jozefsk7456
    @jozefsk7456 28 дней назад

    I had no idea the zoom nagnification pieces are stackable, that changes things.

  • @lrsy5946
    @lrsy5946 22 дня назад

    This video is the first one shows that BR balance rail works for BTX/115 + ME 1.7X😃

  • @marinjokautz4542
    @marinjokautz4542 Месяц назад +1

    Is there a difference between using the BTX + 1.7 doubler, comparing with the ATX - both at 60 x power?
    I mean: is the image a littlebit darker because of the 1.7 doubler or is there no difference at all?

    • @Optics4birding
      @Optics4birding  Месяц назад

      Great question! Technically yes, the 1.7x extender decreases the overall light transmission by introducing extra lenses, but it isn't drastic. It gets tough to compare the brightness because you're looking through the ATX with one eye and the BTX with two eyes. The ATX is brighter, but having both eyes open can make your brain think the BTX appears brighter. Hope this helps!

    • @marinjokautz4542
      @marinjokautz4542 28 дней назад +1

      @@Optics4birding Yes that helps - thank You very much for your informative answer!

  • @mrh9635
    @mrh9635 Месяц назад +2

    Would it be suitable for astronomy? My ideal refractor would be equally suitable for terrestrial and sky viewing.

    • @Optics4birding
      @Optics4birding  Месяц назад +1

      Absolutely you can use the BTX for astronomy! For low light and night time situations, we always recommend pairing it with the 115 mm Objective to get the brightest image. Of course, it depends on which celestial bodies you're trying to see, but the BTX is more than adequate for many astronomy applications. Thank you for asking!

    • @jagmeetsmann
      @jagmeetsmann Месяц назад

      Where’s the expert?

    • @Optics4birding
      @Optics4birding  Месяц назад

      ​@@jagmeetsmann Hello and thank you for commenting. Was your question a response to @mrh9635's question? We responded to his question as well but the RUclips comment section hides certain replies. Apologies if it is not visible.

    • @jagmeetsmann
      @jagmeetsmann Месяц назад

      @@Optics4birding I posted in the wrong thread. But my question is where is the expert in the video? The kid in the video? Please read some expert opinions on scopereviews , cloudy nights etc. Just blabbering will only make this channel end up like optica exotica channel. People who spend money at this level are very particular and such general comments are of no use to them.

    • @TundraTraveller
      @TundraTraveller Месяц назад +2

      @@jagmeetsmann are you still feeling angry, because nobody signed your yearbook in high school?

  • @BenjaminKenway
    @BenjaminKenway 3 дня назад

    I'm just getting into scoping and my cheap tripod is terribky unstable and renders the image unviewably bad. What tripod/head/support do you recommend for the most stability? Thank you.

    • @Optics4birding
      @Optics4birding  3 дня назад +1

      Great question! If you want the best stability available, we recommend the Gitzo and Swarovski carbon fiber tripods. Which head you choose depends on whether or not you're digiscoping or just viewing more casually. The Swarovski CTH or Gitzo GHF2w are our best sellers. If you want a larger one for digiscoping, the Manfrotto MVH500AH and Swarovski PTH are our best digiscoping heads. Hope this helps!

  • @Rico11b
    @Rico11b 28 дней назад

    For the price it costs it should come with a Dwarf assist that would pop out of the case and set it up for you. Only someone with expendable millionaire money should consider purchasing this. Anyone putting this on the credit card is a moron, because by the time you finish paying for it, it'll cost you double. Such foolishness.