No, no, no.......the tempo is more contemplative, not romanticized. Fleisher....listen to his reading. She romanticizes. The piece is about moonlight, not passion anywhere near the sleeve.
Maybe I am misreading your comment a bit, but isn't the wonderful thing about music that it allows multiple interpretations? Obviously everyone can have a favourite, but simply stating one is invalid seems kind of harsh to me. And it's not like because there's a more romantic interpretation the other interpretation doesn't exist anymore. It can all co-exist, which is the beauty of it :)
Vous manquez de sensibilité émotionnelle, fermez les yeux et n'écoutez que cette artiste qui vous livre sa sensibilité féminine. Bien sur Fleisher c'est bien aussi, mais pas mieux.
Congratulations Nino!
Blessings and success.
Very beautiful
The comfort of Clair de Lune she plays is beyond compare
Bravo Nino!
No, no, no.......the tempo is more contemplative, not romanticized. Fleisher....listen to his reading. She romanticizes. The piece is about moonlight, not passion anywhere near the sleeve.
Maybe I am misreading your comment a bit, but isn't the wonderful thing about music that it allows multiple interpretations? Obviously everyone can have a favourite, but simply stating one is invalid seems kind of harsh to me. And it's not like because there's a more romantic interpretation the other interpretation doesn't exist anymore. It can all co-exist, which is the beauty of it :)
She's the closest to the tempo that Debussy played it, which was under 4 minutes. Which I prefer. Most play this work between 5-7 minutes.
I agree, it needs a certain Gallic restraint. She produces beautiful sounds, however it is as you suggest somewhat over romanticised.
Vous manquez de sensibilité émotionnelle, fermez les yeux et n'écoutez que cette artiste qui vous livre sa sensibilité féminine. Bien sur Fleisher c'est bien aussi, mais pas mieux.