lec28 Shock Expansion Method

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 20 авг 2024
  • Oblique Shock, Expansion waves, Slip stream, Pressure match boundary, double wedge,

Комментарии • 4

  • @dipalimane1692
    @dipalimane1692 Год назад

    Thank you sir.

  • @RitTinga
    @RitTinga 4 месяца назад

    Good day! I do not speak foreign languages, I write through an interpreter. How will this profile work on a round wing at speeds up to 100 km/h, Does it make sense to make a round wing with this profile? It is planned to design and build an ultralight aircraft with a circular wing in the form of a disk in the plan. Such a profile is easier to manufacture from wood in artisanal conditions. “thanks.

  • @switchtv2842
    @switchtv2842 2 года назад +1

    From where do you find the pressure rations P2/P01 etc. ? What charts or tables? I cant figure this out :( pls help

    • @isxp
      @isxp 2 года назад +1

      Switch TV, I believe your confusion is about the ratio across the expansion fan (or PM Fan/PM wave, all mean the same thing). The ratio across any isentropic wave has constant stagnation properties. To your question though, the value of p2/p01 would come from an isentropic table, where some input (either Mach number (m2), or PM number (v2), etc), got you a location in a table, at the location of the expansion wave/fan/etc, the pressure ratio p2/p02 is the same thing as p2/p01 because the stagnation pressures across this isentropic expansion fan/wave are constant. He might write p2/p01, but thinking of it as p2/p02 is fine, as long as you know their equivalent. Your textbook/calculator doesn't know where you're at in your problem, so it will typically convey p/p0 and it's up to you to know when the p0's are equal. Answer: they're equal across isentropic processes, like compression waves and expansion fans, but not normal and oblique shocks.