@@55Quirllthey were just "C.Y.A" cover you're ass The Sargent could have overlooked the testimony of the couple and just tossed them to the court and the DA/prosecutor will look at the rigged report "yep, you committed a crime"
Hello guys! i know this seems very random and off-topic, but the truth is that: Jesus is the one true GOD. i understand that y'all may find it annoying, but that's the truth! For God so loved the world that He gave His one and begotten son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life. May God bless you all!
The truth is, most all drug tests are not 100% correct, in some cases they are way down to 70% correct. The pee test you take for a job is only 97% correct, so 3 out of every hundred people get screwed! Probably more, because of poorly conducted tests, and let’s not forget the purposely rigged tests.
There is no bad police. There is no good police. Its just the police. Saying there is good/bad police is like saying there's good/bad blood, crips, kings members. That there are bad/good dru g dealers, grapists, serial kịllers and scam artists. How are any of them anything resembling a good role model?
@@PsRohrbaughNah police are extremely important to society. The problem is it should be a job on the level of lawyer or doctor and not a 2.0 high school diploma with 6 weeks of training. We should increase their pay and lower the number of officers but required at the absolute minimum a bachelor's with a 2 year apprenticeship or a masters and 1 year. They should be required to carry essentially malpractice insurance like doctors have to or hell contractors have to have 2-3 different types of insurance. The lawsuits created by bad police work should come from those policies and not tax payer money. And there should be a board and licence process like lawyers, doctors and contractors have that you have to keep in good standing. Any investigations or complaints filed against them should be handled by a neutral 3rd party as well. Even with this system you will still have some bad cops, it's just like any profession but by increasing the quality of the officers it will ideally drastically lower the awful instances that occur. I truly get that they have a tough job and its a shame that the few bad officers give the hard working good ones a bad name but when you have so much power over the general public where things can literally be life or death or at the very least ruin someone's life you need to be held to a much higher standard.. I know it can be dangerous also but I also am tired about people making it like its the most dangerous job out there and "When they leave in the morning they don't know if they are coming home"... That is everyone in life, you don't know whats going to happen. Statically every job I have had has a higher minor injury, disability level injuries and death rates than police do. Hell even crossing guards have higher desth rates than police. It's a shame that anyone dies on the job but it is also less dangerous than people make it out to be. And hell construction workers provide just as crucial a job as police in keeping the world running and have a much higher injury and death rate but you don't have people marching for them.
Lmao, this doesn't mean Splenda has amphetamines in it. It was a false positive. The way these drug tests work (in my understanding) is that they test for certain chemical markers that'd be present in a certain chemical, and not for the suspected drug itself. These chemical markers are often present in OTHER substances that aren't controlled or psychoactive. In this case, Splenda. A big company making products meant to be consumed can't just throw random drugs in sugar packets and sell them everywhere lmao. Not that simple
Shout out to this dude giving the speech for giving a PROPER shout out, and making sure to include the sergeants full name and where as well. Need more citings like this
So he blamed the officers and not the equipment they were given he's an idiot he's stupid blatantly he's just spewing bulshit to make the police look bad he's a horrible piece of s*** for that because that's misinformation and a lot of police officers have been murdered for misinformation like that second of all yeah not a lot of people actually you know give out the names of the officers especially when they do the right thing like every last one of those officers did who saw a suspicious white substance in a cup and did their job to make sure it wasn't drugs but their equipment failed nothing because they were doing their jobs their equipment failed and going out of his way which he didn't have to a sergeant decides to double-check to make sure innocent people don't go to jail or get arrested or any other s*** like that which quite a bit of other officers wouldn't do because they're going to be like well the government gave me this equipment it's probably reliable
@@tbnrwolff3354What are you on about? The couple told the truth and an officer listened, used his better judgement, and verified their story. By giving the officer’s name, it properly credits him for being a good LEO and others may be encouraged to go a little out of their way to listen and verify.
@@tbnrwolff3354 whoa clip your string Chatty Cathy. Did you ever consider he may have included the Sgt’s name as setting an example of a leader to try follow? Now quit ranting like you’re high on Splenda.
@@tbnrwolff3354. Either you used your Mic to get this rambling tirade recorded, or you have no idea what punctuation and grammar look like. And, like the other responder, I'd like to know what you were "on about" as well. Please?
My respect to the officer who called the Sargeant, wanting to find facts and asked for help. As well as the Sargeant for going above and beyond. God bless all involved in the case.
Thank you. As someone arrested erroneously due to a situation like this...and convicted even though I was innocent....I thank you for making this become something that's finally being looked at. It could save so many from having their lives ruined and or taken away when they are innocent
@@AzguardMikeYeeeeaah, see, I grew up next to a major police academy and have spent time training federal officers. The number who would have the wherewithal to do this are far outweighed by the number that are mild to extreme dickheads. The job attracts people with something to prove. That said, the majority are relatively normal people, of course, but normal people is not what's portrayed in police dramas.
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money to me. If this couple doesn't know enough to keep their Splenda in its original container then they deserve to go to jail. Those drug tests aren't cheap and this guy just wasted one on a hunch? If the couple doesn't like the results of the drug test they can Sue the drug test manufacturer. And l
@@theonlytruetuhlulah9062im meaning that person didnt hear about it because the suspects were released, and not gunned down. Its not hard to figure out. While you "thought" you were calling me out. And you "thought" you were going to have a chance to talk shit. But continue. What would you have said?
I want to thank that sergeant for lowering my blood pressure and making me believe that we actually have a chance to RIGHT THE WRONGS being done to innocent people every day in the UNITED STATES.
No, the Sgt went above and beyond. Once the field test came back positive, he was under no obligation to do anything else but to arrest them. That Sgt is truly 1 in a million.
That's how an investigation should go....proving or disproving what a person says instead of assuming they're guilty and letting the courts sort it out. Kudos to Sgt. Inlow.
In Orlando an officer arrested an old man because of white flakes under his seat in the car. 3 weeks later he was released after a third party lab that was hired by his attorney found it to be Krispy Kream donut glaze. This man had no record and would have still been waiting for the county’s lab to test.
Great leadership displayed there. His patrol officers obviously felt empowered to go with their gut feeling and request his support knowing they could rely on his judgement and he would not ridicule them. He turned up and showed them that they should go that extra mile to protect and serve.
Sergeant Inlow is my stepdads brother and our family is very proud of how serious he takes his job. If it wasn’t for him this couples lives would’ve been ruined but he went above and beyond. Not many officers like him. Proud to call this man family!
@@schagy5294You are a left of center aren’t you? Not that I care at all. Did however feel compelled to inquire. On with my life. No that you don’t matter. (Edit: So uncaring that didn’t QA the comment, care enough to humble myself to correct - ‘No’ = “Know” above.) ☝🏻
@@UnintentionalMexican That's pretty thought provoking. Why do you have to travel together? Why do you need a cup holder? WHAT'S IN THE CUP? Thanks for your reply and have a great day!
Not only that, but this policing is very very bad and actually ruining people's lives and has ruined people's lives.... think about that fact. Splenda will make people do a false positive meth test on these untrustworthy kits that all the cops use, and especially when the police are not educated about them and there use in an investigation on a check stop....education is the key here.
@@Joenzinator Assuming legit lab testing would have been done in the first place. Assuming the cop didn't shoot them when they protested. Assuming the prosecutor didn't try to "make an example out of them". Assuming they could afford a lawyer. Assuming they didn't get lost in the system. Assuming what happened didn't get out...
I was a probation officer and I can tell you that there are about 20 different products, over-the -counter Rx that will make you test positive for most illicit drugs.
When I was drug tested via urine for the first time, I was really scared my cocktail of meds might make the test pop up with something strange. Luckily for me, it came up clean.
@@theglorioushardlardbig-esm8538 Probation officers don’t go out of their way to jam-up probationers. And if they do, they shouldn’t be probation officers. By the way, don’t be a smart ass.
@@edwardd3897 "and if they do they shouldn't be probation officers." Of course not, because they'd be corrupt. But, because you've already started with the position that "they don't do that" you're more likely to over look it in the event that the actual do take some corrupt action. It's the "brotherhood of blue" vs "who watches the watchers" problem. If you assume that police/LEOs and so on are noble good guys, then you miss when they do actually become corrupt. Sure, from time to time there might be some acceptable rule bending... but also there is always a risk of corruption. Saying "Cops never plant evidence" is untrue. It has happened in the past, it is happening somewhere right now, and it will happen again in the future. Did some of that evidence planting allow cops to catch someone who "everyone knew was a criminal", actually were criminals, and were otherwise seemingly uncatchable? Maybe. But, at the same time, it has definitely resulted in innocent people being imprisoned for crimes they didn't commit. Most people aren't terrible criminals, most cops aren't corrupt. Corrupt cops are generally protected by non-corrupt cops... The old few bad apples saying, crops up, "It's just a few bad apples" It's important to remember the REST of the saying. A few bad apples spoil the barrel. If there are bad apples you don't want to allow them in, and if they do get in, you have to get them out before the rot spreads. When we see the thin blue line close up to protect cops for misconduct, we know that the bad apples aren't getting removed, or cleaned, or anything. When we see whistle blowers fired and harassed we know that there is a big problem. The statement "Probation officers don't do Bad Thing" is untrue, it's softened by the follow up, that if they do do bad thing, they shouldn't be POs... but, when you start with the premise that they don't do it, you are unlikely to actually be looking for wrong doing. Being unable to admit there is a problem is itself a problem.
I think the problem is that these field test kits are not reliable.. why do they still use them if they have proven and know that they are not reliable?
Is this particular issue a police problem though? They did what they were supposed to do according to the facts presented in the story... Sgt inlow went a bit above and beyond but the ones who called him did what they were legally bound to do The problem is elsewhere... either in the field test kits reading something incorrectly... or in Splenda for having something that so closely resembles meth it gives a positive result in a field test
@@Bren688Because there is huge disparity in arrest rates and exonerations along racial lines. Being black we wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt even though black people and white people consume drugs at roughly the same rate.
@@Enlightener86 I've just looked into the case that the blokes talking about and it turns out it was actually a white couple who the cop drove a mile to test a pack of Splenda for. So I'm wondering why the person who edited this clip chose to picture a black man being stopped. Why didn't they just use a picture of the actual couple? They were on Fox News so a picture wouldn't be that hard to find.
@@seabeejg thats why you dont rely on common sense...you rely on logic. Logic gives an excuse to people being stupid. Common sense dictates that everyone should know something...
@hyronharrison8127 Whatever you want to argue with that. Lol. My point is it's all nonsense that makes these stories possible. Government and law enforcement is illegitimate. You may think it's logical to have it, I may think it's logical to not have it. Logic is essentially the same thing. Logic can be completely nonsensical and dictating. It's the merging of values that make mental judgment calls righteous or unrighteous, which is also subjective. It just comes down to assertion at the end of the day.
@raymondnecke5806 It tested positive so any arrest would not have been deemed unlawful as the cops would have had probable cause. All I hope that the drug test kit manufacturers were informed about the test and made moves to improve it.
@@wjf0neNot true actually, cause EVERYONE who consumes Splenda would be testin positive for amphetamines, leading to more of a GLOBAL ISSUE being that Splenda is poisoned with amphetamines. So legally rightfully the company making Splenda deserves to be sued out of existence, same for the company making the sugar brand Sweet & Low
That sargent also made Splenda a future rico narcotics case target which auto involves the FBI and CIA. I dare say it's about dam time the sugar brands Sweet and Low, Splenda and ALL OTHER chemical sugar brands be permanently sued out of existence ACROSS THE WORLD Yes I understand this is extreme, but Splenda has hidden amphetamines in it's ingredients, similar to how cocoa cola had cocaine as one of it's ingredients MANY years ago...
@@wjf0nea ton of substances that aren't drugs set of drug tests. Its fairly common. The tests will detect the right stuff, but they'll also give you false positives. People, especially police should be aware of that.
All these special officers are to be respected for their questioning concerns about two strangers and a unique situation ending in freedom...Major blessings.
The manufacturer has said they aren't supposed to be used the way they are. The manufacturer has said that the test is to be used to generate probable cause so that the substance can be tested in a lab. Usually, the substances never see a lab and the field test is used at trial.
They are made that way on purpose, so that the cops have all the authority. If you get out of line they will drug test the donut glaze in your car and give you 10 years.
They're not unreliable. They're doing exactly what they're designed to do. There's nothing you can do about the fact the two substances share the same components. You can't make it more accurate when they're the same thing
@@elyrienvalkyr8167 Having too many false positives with too many common substances is, by definition, unreliable. Change the way the test works or stop using it.
The problem is the test for amphetamines can pop for things that aren't amphetamines. We know Splenda, which has its own flaws, isn't an actual amphetamine because you'd be hearing about all the bootleg meth on the streets made from it. I'm not a chemical engineer, but I suspect the test matches to a certain chemical chain that is common to amphetamines that CAN be present in other things, but has a totally different effect based on the rest of that chain. I believe this is one of the edge cases that plagues heuristic approaches for field information gathering.
Look up the case of the Birmingham 6 in the UK. Convicted on the back of a flawed test for explosives. It reacted to Nitro cellulose that's found in explosives but also in varnish and other substances. It took years to clear them.
Sergeant is a good guy, but thankfully the officers on scene called him. I can imagine the majority of the time they are hearing similar excuses when they find drugs.
the truth is it probably would have been quicker just going to the station and having it tested on the calibrated machine than waiting for the sergeants to do his science experiment
@@LiamL763 the real question is where is the probable cause? Seeing a white substance in a cupholder is not sufficient for PC. The test constituted a search and seizure, so what PC existed that it was drugs? Was the couple acting as if they were on meth? Doubtful, or he wouldn't have have believed them. Good for him for questioning and calling a sergeant more interested in truth than an arrest, but the move to search absent probable cause and exigent circumstances is troublesome.
@@Boogbama123 You would be surprised how many common substances will make tests like that false positive. In the Army when we wanted a situation where running a field NBC test would show chemical agents, we'd use Windex as our test substance because it would do that, letting the trainees see exactly what happens.
I have a child (bipolar) in prison that has had privileges (including visitations) revoked because the medication she is now REQUIRED to take (refusal is not allowed) gives a false positive for illicit drugs (yes, they do manage to get smuggled in on occasion). Salute to the C.O. that used common sense and did a quick, easy experiment.
@@FlorenceEluno, your politicians are the happy ones. You vote for the politicians that dictate what police do, you vote for prosecutors that force police to do stuff. All the problems go back to who you voted for. You are the problem and refuse to do anything of substance to change it because you don’t want to admit that you voted for the wrong people
Then you have to ask yourself if they are still using them and they know that they are not reliable then they are just trying to find ways to bring harm to us to enrich themselves..
Now, that's good police work. Investigation seemed to come naturally to this man. I have a good feeling that if this guy were chief, he would have the most respectable police department, possibly in the nation.😉👍👍👍
The field test kit may have been scientifically valid at manufacture, but part of the police checklist should be to check the expiration date. I can almost guarantee there are officers in every county, carrying expired test kits. Expired assay reagents absolutely produce false positives. That is why they have dates. Another problem exists, and that is that some tests react to a hydrocarbon chain structure. It is very possible that such a chain exists in more than one product. Artificial sweeteners exposed to heat may produce a small amount of formaldehyde, which also can be present in amphetamine. Tests must be refined for exclusivity.
It's neither one of those. The makers of the tests have said that these tests are not supposed to be use like this. The tests are supposed to be used as a preliminary to get cause to send the substance to a lab. Most of the time, they just use the field kit at trial instead of sending it to a lab.
@@scottlemiere2024 I would argue that using the test incorrectly is still government incompetence. Not at the officer level, but whoever decided to use the test incorrectly. In any case, it should be grounds for at least reasonable doubt.
I got arrested for a dui. My bloodwork came back 100% CLEAN. nothing I don’t even drink. Idk if I can do anything about it but that one police officer made me wary of all others now
Unfortunately you are going to have to spend money on a laywer. Sounds like you would win and it will cost $ but it is usually better than being found guilty. Unless you have a deffered program in you State.
Got pulled over for DUI, officer said I look drunk, demanded a blood test, I was sober so I accepted. Tested positive for THC by products. Had to take a psychological test, said I smoke a couple of times a month on weekends to relax but never when I drive. Psychologist diagnosed me as a habitual user with a advanced drug problem and I am not allowed to drive for the couple of years now (7 years). Now I have to pay thousands of moneys to prove to the state that I am not a drug addict anymore even though I have never been one.
I'm a retired doctor and really never thought about forensic medicine. When I finally looked into it and see how they verified the accuracy of tests and procedures to do that, I was surprised at how sloppy their methods are. What the cops do determine the accuracy would be appalling to the medical community.
The justice system in general seems to be rife with pseudoscience, sloppy methods, and charlatans. Remember the famous FBI fiber matching lab? "FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis Contained Errors in at Least 90 Percent of Cases in Ongoing Review" www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-testimony-on-microscopic-hair-analysis-contained-errors-in-at-least-90-percent-of-cases-in-ongoing-review "Blood spatter analysis," many arson investigation methods, and other things have similarly not held up when scrutinized.
Y'all act like they are making the equipment and doing the labs themselves. That's not how it works . The equipment needs to be updated and fixed for sure . Who makes that equipment?
@lorireed8046 I'm not just talking about the cop. I'm talking about everyone including the cops, the DA, the lab techs, the forensics evidence "experts", the judges, all of them. None of them seem to know what they're doing. I get that the cops and the DA don't have a science background. I just think that they don't realize how bad the science yet confident that their methods are bad. I think that some of them know how bad it is, but they just don't want to "rock the boat" and piss off the cops and DAs.
May have been trying to call their bluff. "OK, here's a Splenda packet, now watch what happens in the test kit..... huh, it shows positive, huh, well then. Well, I guess you win this time."
I tested positive for methamphetamines while trying to donate plasma. I had taken a behind the counter Mucinex (there strong stuff) the day before and that morning. I’ve never even seen meth in my entire life. I was permanently banned to donate blood or plasma there. Insane.
Sounds like time to sue the manufacturer of those field tests! I'm also reminded of the infamous case of the guy who ate a glazed donut, and the flakes of sugar glaze in his car likewise tested positive for methamphetamine. But unlike the couple in this video, he was arrested and was in jail for a while before eventually being released. This whole "War on Drugs" needs to be reevaluated from the ground up. It's gone overboard and is doing more harm than good.
My sister 46yr old single working mother was arrested a few weeks ago for literally no reason. That cop pulled her over for a headlight out for the full intention to arrest her at any cost. He said he smelled booze and then she blew a 0, then he claimed it was pot and searched her car found nothing. She hadn't smoked in her car but even if they smelled it she has a medical card.the cops arrested her and stated she was "too happy" report said "Carefree inhibitions". 500$ bond for a dui strickly on the cops word after passing every single test
You absolutely have zero idea on the amount of shithousary that goes on every day, our method of learning through trail and error in the real world experience is crazy, cooked..
@fusion3690; So, it's NOT an amphetamine test, at all, it's a test for something found *with*, or a metabolite of...in short, it's too easy to end up with an arrest record, yep, even if not charged, you still have an arrest record, so, if it happens twice, officer #2 will see an arrest record as "evidence" that you're trouble!
Same test put a man who ate crispy clean glazed donuts in jail and all kinds of problems for 9 months until the real lab said yeah it was glazing from donuts. His wife divorced him, his job fired him. He didn't get his job back, but he did sue them and got something like $120,000. Then he sued the cops and I never heard how that went.
@@ladyfame1430 I asked my doctor about this. He said we don't know what they are using and putting in there to make artificial sweeteners, but we can assume from this video that anything "artificial" is not always the best thing to eat or drink. I'm diabetes 2 and he said if I need to sweeten things, limited amounts of sugar are better than artificial stuff. I trust Dr. Groff. So, I'm done with artificial sweeteners and additives. Of course, it's up to each one of us what we decide to put, or not put, into our bodies.
Kudos to the sergeant for being so diligent; that guy deserves a commendation!!!
And the officers for calling their Sargent and telling them about the problem
@@55Quirllthey were just "C.Y.A" cover you're ass
The Sargent could have overlooked the testimony of the couple and just tossed them to the court and the DA/prosecutor will look at the rigged report "yep, you committed a crime"
Diligent? Intelligent. And that is an ingredient all too often missing
@@lucmatter9601 If they show either of them they are dropped immediately
Surprised if he didn't get a reprimand, the state has to hit its quotas for the private prisons for the "land of the free" 😂
The cop who listened and then explained the situation to the sergeant should be commended as well
Agreed
Hello guys! i know this seems very random and off-topic, but the truth is that: Jesus is the one true GOD. i understand that y'all may find it annoying, but that's the truth! For God so loved the world that He gave His one and begotten son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have everlasting life. May God bless you all!
The truth is, most all drug tests are not 100% correct, in some cases they are way down to 70% correct. The pee test you take for a job is only 97% correct, so 3 out of every hundred people get screwed! Probably more, because of poorly conducted tests, and let’s not forget the purposely rigged tests.
The rare good cops get drummed out of their job. Some have even been killed.
@@gabsmellow6750allah swt❤
Perfect example of "people don't hate police, they hate bad police". Much respect.
Naw, I hate policing in general.
@@brian954 So anarchy?
@@PsRohrbaugh Yes, unironically.
There is no bad police. There is no good police. Its just the police.
Saying there is good/bad police is like saying there's good/bad blood, crips, kings members. That there are bad/good dru g dealers, grapists, serial kịllers and scam artists. How are any of them anything resembling a good role model?
@@PsRohrbaughNah police are extremely important to society. The problem is it should be a job on the level of lawyer or doctor and not a 2.0 high school diploma with 6 weeks of training. We should increase their pay and lower the number of officers but required at the absolute minimum a bachelor's with a 2 year apprenticeship or a masters and 1 year. They should be required to carry essentially malpractice insurance like doctors have to or hell contractors have to have 2-3 different types of insurance. The lawsuits created by bad police work should come from those policies and not tax payer money. And there should be a board and licence process like lawyers, doctors and contractors have that you have to keep in good standing. Any investigations or complaints filed against them should be handled by a neutral 3rd party as well. Even with this system you will still have some bad cops, it's just like any profession but by increasing the quality of the officers it will ideally drastically lower the awful instances that occur. I truly get that they have a tough job and its a shame that the few bad officers give the hard working good ones a bad name but when you have so much power over the general public where things can literally be life or death or at the very least ruin someone's life you need to be held to a much higher standard.. I know it can be dangerous also but I also am tired about people making it like its the most dangerous job out there and "When they leave in the morning they don't know if they are coming home"... That is everyone in life, you don't know whats going to happen. Statically every job I have had has a higher minor injury, disability level injuries and death rates than police do. Hell even crossing guards have higher desth rates than police. It's a shame that anyone dies on the job but it is also less dangerous than people make it out to be. And hell construction workers provide just as crucial a job as police in keeping the world running and have a much higher injury and death rate but you don't have people marching for them.
Great work sergeant,
now arrest SPLENDA 👿
That's actually the sad truth of the story.
Not Splenda. The assholes who created the field test.
Oh was the brand? 😮 I got some serious house work to do 😂
Lmao, this doesn't mean Splenda has amphetamines in it. It was a false positive. The way these drug tests work (in my understanding) is that they test for certain chemical markers that'd be present in a certain chemical, and not for the suspected drug itself. These chemical markers are often present in OTHER substances that aren't controlled or psychoactive. In this case, Splenda.
A big company making products meant to be consumed can't just throw random drugs in sugar packets and sell them everywhere lmao. Not that simple
Shout out to this dude giving the speech for giving a PROPER shout out, and making sure to include the sergeants full name and where as well. Need more citings like this
So he blamed the officers and not the equipment they were given he's an idiot he's stupid blatantly he's just spewing bulshit to make the police look bad he's a horrible piece of s*** for that because that's misinformation and a lot of police officers have been murdered for misinformation like that second of all yeah not a lot of people actually you know give out the names of the officers especially when they do the right thing like every last one of those officers did who saw a suspicious white substance in a cup and did their job to make sure it wasn't drugs but their equipment failed nothing because they were doing their jobs their equipment failed and going out of his way which he didn't have to a sergeant decides to double-check to make sure innocent people don't go to jail or get arrested or any other s*** like that which quite a bit of other officers wouldn't do because they're going to be like well the government gave me this equipment it's probably reliable
@@tbnrwolff3354What are you on about? The couple told the truth and an officer listened, used his better judgement, and verified their story.
By giving the officer’s name, it properly credits him for being a good LEO and others may be encouraged to go a little out of their way to listen and verify.
@@tbnrwolff3354 whoa clip your string Chatty Cathy. Did you ever consider he may have included the Sgt’s name as setting an example of a leader to try follow?
Now quit ranting like you’re high on Splenda.
@@tbnrwolff3354. Either you used your Mic to get this rambling tirade recorded, or you have no idea what punctuation and grammar look like. And, like the other responder, I'd like to know what you were "on about" as well. Please?
My respect to the officer who called the Sargeant, wanting to find facts and asked for help. As well as the Sargeant for going above and beyond. God bless all involved in the case.
This is a true story
Thank you I'm going to send this to my defense attorney
Thank you. As someone arrested erroneously due to a situation like this...and convicted even though I was innocent....I thank you for making this become something that's finally being looked at. It could save so many from having their lives ruined and or taken away when they are innocent
Is there a list of all the substance that will create a false positives?
Whatever the cops want them to be. Most will just fake a result if the don't like the citizens skin colour, or religio, or face...@@scottdavidson7543
Always nice to see an officer worthy of the badge.
💯❤
I have to change my way of bringing them to U.S,it worked up to Mexico😂😂
happens all the time. Just sad that a vocal MINORITY of people kick off about the police and get heard the loudest.
@@AzguardMikeYeeeeaah, see, I grew up next to a major police academy and have spent time training federal officers. The number who would have the wherewithal to do this are far outweighed by the number that are mild to extreme dickheads. The job attracts people with something to prove.
That said, the majority are relatively normal people, of course, but normal people is not what's portrayed in police dramas.
💯👍🏾
Sounds like actual police work. Well done
Sounds like a waste of taxpayer money to me. If this couple doesn't know enough to keep their Splenda in its original container then they deserve to go to jail. Those drug tests aren't cheap and this guy just wasted one on a hunch? If the couple doesn't like the results of the drug test they can Sue the drug test manufacturer. And l
@@rustyshakleford5230buying the test and using them when they don't work is a waste of taxpayers money
@@EastEndChick9 I agree. Your reasoning is the actual correct one.
This seargent actully proved the tests were bogus
@@rustyshakleford5230 you are saying this as you grab your own ankles
@@rustyshakleford5230To me it sounds like they had a suspicion and we’re doing their best to see what was happening.
Wow!!!!! Never knew or heard about this!!! Kudos to the Sargeant!!!
you didnt hear about it because nothing happened.
@@blacksnakegray2552
So he literally named names, and your saying the story is pretend?
Or are you saying because there was no arrest?
@@theonlytruetuhlulah9062im meaning that person didnt hear about it because the suspects were released, and not gunned down. Its not hard to figure out. While you "thought" you were calling me out. And you "thought" you were going to have a chance to talk shit. But continue. What would you have said?
The problem is that after 2020, people are being aware that all tests are misleading.
I want to thank that sergeant for lowering my blood pressure and making me believe that we actually have a chance to RIGHT THE WRONGS being done to innocent people every day in the UNITED STATES.
Props to that sergeant for doing his job. That was quality police work.
No, the Sgt went above and beyond. Once the field test came back positive, he was under no obligation to do anything else but to arrest them. That Sgt is truly 1 in a million.
Don't you mean detective work
❤
@@Bronxxxnyc
Why do you love tyranny?
Props to the field cops for doing their jobs and calling it in when they were unsure.
That's how an investigation should go....proving or disproving what a person says instead of assuming they're guilty and letting the courts sort it out. Kudos to Sgt. Inlow.
There’s an old saying i like from an old Steven Seagal movie, & it goes a little something like this “ assumptions are the mother of all fuckups “
@@sharronbrennon899 Was that Exit Wounds or Under Siege?
@ Under Siege, either the first or second one
Much respect to the Sergent...common sense & intelligence goes a long way and in many directions.
That was an intelligent sergeant. That should be a question on the sergeant test. Great job, sergeant . Kudos 👏 to u, Jimmy.
Well done Sergeant Inlow. Checked the claim and acted approriately. Nice work.
What do they put in our food?
Congratulations to this officer . AMERICA needs more officers like
you. Thank you
The reality is that PROHIBITION is ENTRAPMENT
Legislation.
There are but you just don't hear about them. "Cop does bad things" gets more hits than "cop does good thing".
Stop being an idiot. Most cops are this good. We only hear about, what, a handful of bad cases that usually are twisted by the media anyway.
In Orlando an officer arrested an old man because of white flakes under his seat in the car. 3 weeks later he was released after a third party lab that was hired by his attorney found it to be Krispy Kream donut glaze. This man had no record and would have still been waiting for the county’s lab to test.
Guilty until proven innocent.
I'm in bi gsss trouble then. I LOVE KRISPY KREME !!! Their donuts are incredible!!!
The county lab likely had no plans to test it. The plan was to hold him until he pled guilty.
@@scottlemiere2024that would be very Japanese of them.
Lol, that's crazy you remember that. Because that was my neighbor, we got together and helped his family with the money to do that.
Great leadership displayed there. His patrol officers obviously felt empowered to go with their gut feeling and request his support knowing they could rely on his judgement and he would not ridicule them. He turned up and showed them that they should go that extra mile to protect and serve.
That a true professional officer .thank you
Sergeant Inlow is my stepdads brother and our family is very proud of how serious he takes his job. If it wasn’t for him this couples lives would’ve been ruined but he went above and beyond. Not many officers like him. Proud to call this man family!
Please give him a big hug and tell him an American patriot gives his gratitude, God bless you and your family.
“Not many officers like him” tells me he’s a good cop!
This is BS sounds like somebody's trying to avoid paperwork
@@schagy5294 oh, you were there?
@@schagy5294You are a left of center aren’t you? Not that I care at all. Did however feel compelled to inquire. On with my life. No that you don’t matter. (Edit: So uncaring that didn’t QA the comment, care enough to humble myself to correct - ‘No’ = “Know” above.) ☝🏻
Ok, so the obvious solution is to make Splenda illegal.
No more artificial sweetener or sugar substitutes for me. No way!
Might be even better than banning couples and cup holders.
Stop with your stupidity
@@KathrynDare Thanks for your reply and have a great day!
@@UnintentionalMexican That's pretty thought provoking. Why do you have to travel together? Why do you need a cup holder? WHAT'S IN THE CUP? Thanks for your reply and have a great day!
Brilliant Sergeant who thought outside the CopWorld Box. Absolutely OUTSTANDING!
Props to the officers for treating the 'suspects' claims with respect, and checking it out with their sarge
Nothing like actually doing an investigation. Sad that this basic level of police work is now met with kudos.
@@Poppa_Capinyoaz exactly. this deserves no praise it is the absolute bare minimum
@@Gabriel-te9sm if this is bare minimum then what would you consider average
And they didn't take everything the couple owns. Then making them litigate to get their stuff back. Because the police can, and do, do exactly that.
This right here, no one's talking about the cops that took the time to call their Sargeant
Wow, that could have ruined that couple's lives.
Not only that, but this policing is very very bad and actually ruining people's lives and has ruined people's lives.... think about that fact. Splenda will make people do a false positive meth test on these untrustworthy kits that all the cops use, and especially when the police are not educated about them and there use in an investigation on a check stop....education is the key here.
Nah, the legitimate lab testing would have exonerated them. Field tests aren't perfect, but good enough for the "probable cause" needed for an arrest.
@@Joenzinator Good to know. Thank you.
@@Joenzinator Assuming legit lab testing would have been done in the first place. Assuming the cop didn't shoot them when they protested. Assuming the prosecutor didn't try to "make an example out of them". Assuming they could afford a lawyer. Assuming they didn't get lost in the system. Assuming what happened didn't get out...
@@Alverant that’s why everyone is entitled to a lawyer and a jury. Keep quiet and get a good attorney.
Much respect to the officer and sergeant for actually doing their job and not passing the buck.
Bless they souls for being humanly sweet
Mwah to QB involved ❤❤❤❤
Now that’s going above and beyond!!! For the community that’s protecting and serving !! ❤ this is a cop I can stand behind
Above and beyond or doing his job?
@@THE.THRESHOLDINGHe is certainly above and beyond 99% of sargeants. A real detective!
I was a probation officer and I can tell you that there are about 20 different products, over-the -counter Rx that will make you test positive for most illicit drugs.
When I was drug tested via urine for the first time, I was really scared my cocktail of meds might make the test pop up with something strange. Luckily for me, it came up clean.
Because those drug "test" strips are repackaged PH strips.
You can easily test this with baking soda.
So you admit that police officer's purposely arrest people without actual evidence and you openly falsify it
@@theglorioushardlardbig-esm8538 Probation officers don’t go out of their way to jam-up probationers. And if they do, they shouldn’t be probation officers. By the way, don’t be a smart ass.
@@edwardd3897 "and if they do they shouldn't be probation officers."
Of course not, because they'd be corrupt. But, because you've already started with the position that "they don't do that" you're more likely to over look it in the event that the actual do take some corrupt action.
It's the "brotherhood of blue" vs "who watches the watchers" problem.
If you assume that police/LEOs and so on are noble good guys, then you miss when they do actually become corrupt.
Sure, from time to time there might be some acceptable rule bending... but also there is always a risk of corruption.
Saying "Cops never plant evidence" is untrue. It has happened in the past, it is happening somewhere right now, and it will happen again in the future. Did some of that evidence planting allow cops to catch someone who "everyone knew was a criminal", actually were criminals, and were otherwise seemingly uncatchable? Maybe. But, at the same time, it has definitely resulted in innocent people being imprisoned for crimes they didn't commit.
Most people aren't terrible criminals, most cops aren't corrupt. Corrupt cops are generally protected by non-corrupt cops...
The old few bad apples saying, crops up, "It's just a few bad apples"
It's important to remember the REST of the saying. A few bad apples spoil the barrel.
If there are bad apples you don't want to allow them in, and if they do get in, you have to get them out before the rot spreads.
When we see the thin blue line close up to protect cops for misconduct, we know that the bad apples aren't getting removed, or cleaned, or anything.
When we see whistle blowers fired and harassed we know that there is a big problem.
The statement "Probation officers don't do Bad Thing" is untrue, it's softened by the follow up, that if they do do bad thing, they shouldn't be POs... but, when you start with the premise that they don't do it, you are unlikely to actually be looking for wrong doing. Being unable to admit there is a problem is itself a problem.
Thank you.
Sergeant Inow for being the exception. Every cop will admit to himself that there is a police problem.
I think the problem is that these field test kits are not reliable.. why do they still use them if they have proven and know that they are not reliable?
And herself too
@@GovindaS-c5x
Thank you for saying that🎯💯
Is this particular issue a police problem though? They did what they were supposed to do according to the facts presented in the story... Sgt inlow went a bit above and beyond but the ones who called him did what they were legally bound to do
The problem is elsewhere... either in the field test kits reading something incorrectly... or in Splenda for having something that so closely resembles meth it gives a positive result in a field test
How is this an example of a police problem?
Now that's what you call policing. 👏👏👏👏👏👏
As a black man, I say cops like him need to be the ones in charge of the police as a whole
Why bring the colour of your skin up? It's totally irrelevant in a situation like this!
@@Bren688Because there is huge disparity in arrest rates and exonerations along racial lines. Being black we wouldn't get the benefit of the doubt even though black people and white people consume drugs at roughly the same rate.
For the obvious reasons. Too many wrongful arrests in the black community.@@Bren688
@@Bren688 yeah.... no its not
@@Enlightener86 I've just looked into the case that the blokes talking about and it turns out it was actually a white couple who the cop drove a mile to test a pack of Splenda for. So I'm wondering why the person who edited this clip chose to picture a black man being stopped.
Why didn't they just use a picture of the actual couple? They were on Fox News so a picture wouldn't be that hard to find.
very well put... we need more genuinely educated folks speaking in important topics
Sergeant Jimmy Inlow.
Elevate people who do the right thing and more people will do the right thing
They did elevate him, he has been promoted to Captain.
Great job Sergeant Inlow! Not only did you go that extra mile to make sure, you also taught your employees to think outside the box.
IMAGINE THAT... AN ACTUAL COMMON SENSE THINKER.... GREAT JOB SIR!!!!!
And thats why were letting you go sgt inlow. You're giving us a good reputation...stop it...
Yes! That's all it took! Common sense.
Common sense would be to ban those test kits and they not be admissible in court.
@@seabeejg thats why you dont rely on common sense...you rely on logic. Logic gives an excuse to people being stupid. Common sense dictates that everyone should know something...
@hyronharrison8127 Whatever you want to argue with that. Lol. My point is it's all nonsense that makes these stories possible. Government and law enforcement is illegitimate. You may think it's logical to have it, I may think it's logical to not have it. Logic is essentially the same thing. Logic can be completely nonsensical and dictating. It's the merging of values that make mental judgment calls righteous or unrighteous, which is also subjective. It just comes down to assertion at the end of the day.
Plot twist: The gas station was selling amphetamine disguised as splenda
😂😂😂
😂😂😂
I was wondering why no one was addressing the fact that the Splenda tested positive from the store do we need to start questioning what is in Splenda?
@@Debi-gv3pb theres a chemical thats probably used in both things that the kit looks for and it reacts with in a similar way
@@Debi-gv3pb isn't it in diet coke? 😂
Big Ups, Sarge!
Thank you for serving!
Thanks!
The sergeant just saved the dept millions in false arrest suit
@raymondnecke5806
It tested positive so any arrest would not have been deemed unlawful as the cops would have had probable cause. All I hope that the drug test kit manufacturers were informed about the test and made moves to improve it.
Or some people doing time. Make a conviction. Well done Sargeant!
@@wjf0neNot true actually, cause EVERYONE who consumes Splenda would be testin positive for amphetamines, leading to more of a GLOBAL ISSUE being that Splenda is poisoned with amphetamines. So legally rightfully the company making Splenda deserves to be sued out of existence, same for the company making the sugar brand Sweet & Low
That sargent also made Splenda a future rico narcotics case target which auto involves the FBI and CIA. I dare say it's about dam time the sugar brands Sweet and Low, Splenda and ALL OTHER chemical sugar brands be permanently sued out of existence ACROSS THE WORLD
Yes I understand this is extreme, but Splenda has hidden amphetamines in it's ingredients, similar to how cocoa cola had cocaine as one of it's ingredients MANY years ago...
@@wjf0nea ton of substances that aren't drugs set of drug tests. Its fairly common. The tests will detect the right stuff, but they'll also give you false positives. People, especially police should be aware of that.
This is an incredible story, but imagine all the people that would not sound so convincing to make cops question their own protocols...
What a refreshing story.
About time.
The citizens are not all animals we're here to live.
Well done sergeant
All these special officers are to be respected for their questioning concerns about two strangers and a unique situation ending in freedom...Major blessings.
That's a true public servant. Also WTF is up with these drug test kits? They're notoriously unreliable.
The manufacturer has said they aren't supposed to be used the way they are. The manufacturer has said that the test is to be used to generate probable cause so that the substance can be tested in a lab.
Usually, the substances never see a lab and the field test is used at trial.
They are made that way on purpose, so that the cops have all the authority. If you get out of line they will drug test the donut glaze in your car and give you 10 years.
They're not unreliable. They're doing exactly what they're designed to do. There's nothing you can do about the fact the two substances share the same components. You can't make it more accurate when they're the same thing
@@elyrienvalkyr8167 right but that's not the problem, it's HOW these tests are being used
@@elyrienvalkyr8167
Having too many false positives with too many common substances is, by definition, unreliable. Change the way the test works or stop using it.
Yooooo wait the fffff up!! What the hell is Splenda doing poppin positive for AMPhs
Yes! THAT SHOULD BE REPORTED.. WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED HERE?
EXACTLY! All of those fake sugars cause cancer in laboratory animals.
The problem is the test for amphetamines can pop for things that aren't amphetamines. We know Splenda, which has its own flaws, isn't an actual amphetamine because you'd be hearing about all the bootleg meth on the streets made from it. I'm not a chemical engineer, but I suspect the test matches to a certain chemical chain that is common to amphetamines that CAN be present in other things, but has a totally different effect based on the rest of that chain. I believe this is one of the edge cases that plagues heuristic approaches for field information gathering.
@@HDL_CinC_Dragon 💯💯💯
Look up the case of the Birmingham 6 in the UK. Convicted on the back of a flawed test for explosives. It reacted to Nitro cellulose that's found in explosives but also in varnish and other substances. It took years to clear them.
Sergeant is a good guy, but thankfully the officers on scene called him. I can imagine the majority of the time they are hearing similar excuses when they find drugs.
I don't think there are many cases involving splenda.
@@Boogbama123those Drug test kits give positive results for everything
the truth is it probably would have been quicker just going to the station and having it tested on the calibrated machine than waiting for the sergeants to do his science experiment
@@LiamL763 the real question is where is the probable cause? Seeing a white substance in a cupholder is not sufficient for PC. The test constituted a search and seizure, so what PC existed that it was drugs? Was the couple acting as if they were on meth? Doubtful, or he wouldn't have have believed them. Good for him for questioning and calling a sergeant more interested in truth than an arrest, but the move to search absent probable cause and exigent circumstances is troublesome.
@@Boogbama123 You would be surprised how many common substances will make tests like that false positive. In the Army when we wanted a situation where running a field NBC test would show chemical agents, we'd use Windex as our test substance because it would do that, letting the trainees see exactly what happens.
Thanks sarge for taking the extra steps to get these folks justice.
Now that is one upstanding sergeant. I tip my hat to you
I have a child (bipolar) in prison that has had privileges (including visitations) revoked because the medication she is now REQUIRED to take (refusal is not allowed) gives a false positive for illicit drugs (yes, they do manage to get smuggled in on occasion). Salute to the C.O. that used common sense and did a quick, easy experiment.
That's horrible. I wish you both the best.
That sounds like a really tough position for you as a parent to be in. You must feel so frustrated in your inability to help or do anything
@@cactusjackhausen8508 Thank you. We still love the child just not the action that caused the problem and sorrow.
It has also been studied tested and proven that these field tests are highly inaccurate.
And no one is trying to perfect it. Their happy with the false evidence arrests smh
@@FlorenceEluno, your politicians are the happy ones. You vote for the politicians that dictate what police do, you vote for prosecutors that force police to do stuff. All the problems go back to who you voted for. You are the problem and refuse to do anything of substance to change it because you don’t want to admit that you voted for the wrong people
@FlorenceElu 💰 generates for court guards/judges/lawyers/ prison industry
Then you have to ask yourself if they are still using them and they know that they are not reliable then they are just trying to find ways to bring harm to us to enrich themselves..
@@FlorenceElu there are way more accurate tests.. but the state wants your bud .. and whats in your pokets.. they like those coins you know.
Much respect to the genuine efforts.
Real police work. Kudos, sergeant Jimmy Inlow!
Lol The majority police don't do this shit so real police work would have been to violate their rights and you know it
Now, that's good police work. Investigation seemed to come naturally to this man. I have a good feeling that if this guy were chief, he would have the most respectable police department, possibly in the nation.😉👍👍👍
The sad thing is, officers like him don't typically get promoted to chief, as evidenced by the abundance of bad officers.
Plot twist the Splenda at the store was also amphetamines
The USA needs many more good Cops like Officer Inlow.
The field test kit may have been scientifically valid at manufacture, but part of the police checklist should be to check the expiration date. I can almost guarantee there are officers in every county, carrying expired test kits. Expired assay reagents absolutely produce false positives. That is why they have dates.
Another problem exists, and that is that some tests react to a hydrocarbon chain structure. It is very possible that such a chain exists in more than one product. Artificial sweeteners exposed to heat may produce a small amount of formaldehyde, which also can be present in amphetamine.
Tests must be refined for exclusivity.
So basically it’s either government incompetence or the fact that science is fallible
Didn't know field tests had expiration dates. Edit: Should someone ask the expiration date of a field test?
It's neither one of those.
The makers of the tests have said that these tests are not supposed to be use like this. The tests are supposed to be used as a preliminary to get cause to send the substance to a lab.
Most of the time, they just use the field kit at trial instead of sending it to a lab.
@@scottlemiere2024 I would argue that using the test incorrectly is still government incompetence. Not at the officer level, but whoever decided to use the test incorrectly. In any case, it should be grounds for at least reasonable doubt.
I mean wasn’t the drug test right that there were drugs in the car
Thank You Sergeant for protecting and serving !!!!!
I got arrested for a dui. My bloodwork came back 100% CLEAN. nothing I don’t even drink. Idk if I can do anything about it but that one police officer made me wary of all others now
You can sue them for quite a bit of money and should, contact a lawyer as soon as possible, hope the event was recent
They are all organized criminals
Unfortunately you are going to have to spend money on a laywer. Sounds like you would win and it will cost $ but it is usually better than being found guilty. Unless you have a deffered program in you State.
Got pulled over for DUI, officer said I look drunk, demanded a blood test, I was sober so I accepted. Tested positive for THC by products. Had to take a psychological test, said I smoke a couple of times a month on weekends to relax but never when I drive. Psychologist diagnosed me as a habitual user with a advanced drug problem and I am not allowed to drive for the couple of years now (7 years). Now I have to pay thousands of moneys to prove to the state that I am not a drug addict anymore even though I have never been one.
You say arrested, but, not charged? If they let you go you're probably just quirky or a problem.
Great Job 👏 Thank you God for honest officers 👮♀️
I'm a retired doctor and really never thought about forensic medicine. When I finally looked into it and see how they verified the accuracy of tests and procedures to do that, I was surprised at how sloppy their methods are. What the cops do determine the accuracy would be appalling to the medical community.
The justice system in general seems to be rife with pseudoscience, sloppy methods, and charlatans. Remember the famous FBI fiber matching lab? "FBI Testimony on Microscopic Hair Analysis Contained Errors in at Least 90 Percent of Cases in Ongoing Review" www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/fbi-testimony-on-microscopic-hair-analysis-contained-errors-in-at-least-90-percent-of-cases-in-ongoing-review
"Blood spatter analysis," many arson investigation methods, and other things have similarly not held up when scrutinized.
Yep they don’t care if your innocent or guilty they’re own equipment will be lying to them but nah lets arrest em
So, so much of forensic science is completely junk science and it's scary.
Y'all act like they are making the equipment and doing the labs themselves. That's not how it works . The equipment needs to be updated and fixed for sure . Who makes that equipment?
@lorireed8046 I'm not just talking about the cop. I'm talking about everyone including the cops, the DA, the lab techs, the forensics evidence "experts", the judges, all of them. None of them seem to know what they're doing. I get that the cops and the DA don't have a science background. I just think that they don't realize how bad the science yet confident that their methods are bad. I think that some of them know how bad it is, but they just don't want to "rock the boat" and piss off the cops and DAs.
Great work Sarg. We need many more offers of your Caliber..BIG UP!!
Sergeant Jimmy, you rock!!
He did more scientific replication than actual scientists.
Sarge, thank you sir. The public appreciates you
Finally a great example of great detective work and the work of a not lazy, good cop.
Wow!! Unbelievable!! Thank you Sergeant for doing your job thoroughly and going above and beyond the call of duty..👍👍👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸
That's called *"due diligence".* Kudos to Sgt. Inlow 👍
Kudos for the sergeant doing that but the bigger question is, what in the hell does Splenda put in their packets?!
more like how the fuck does the field test work to confuse those two molecules
Same as you guys I have questions too. Aren't it supposed to be eatibile
@@MeMe-ht2hdDefinitely supposed to be edible, not sure about the fake sugar though 🤔😂.
😂 It aint meth, splenda would sell out immediately. Junkies aint smoking splenda
@@williamtaylor5320 not yet at least
That cop, right there deserves an award The way he gathers evidence. Wow.
May have been trying to call their bluff.
"OK, here's a Splenda packet, now watch what happens in the test kit..... huh, it shows positive, huh, well then. Well, I guess you win this time."
I tested positive for methamphetamines while trying to donate plasma. I had taken a behind the counter Mucinex (there strong stuff) the day before and that morning. I’ve never even seen meth in my entire life. I was permanently banned to donate blood or plasma there. Insane.
Thank you, Sarge… You are one that would investigate first and then arrest. Your subordinates arrest first then investigate.
Great job Sargent I wish there was more incredible Sargents like this how many people have been wrongly charged for this as a crime!!
Now that is how you investigate.
True Servant of the peace
Thank you for your service Sargent Inlow.
He's a Captain now.
Sounds like time to sue the manufacturer of those field tests!
I'm also reminded of the infamous case of the guy who ate a glazed donut, and the flakes of sugar glaze in his car likewise tested positive for methamphetamine. But unlike the couple in this video, he was arrested and was in jail for a while before eventually being released.
This whole "War on Drugs" needs to be reevaluated from the ground up. It's gone overboard and is doing more harm than good.
This is a truly phenomenal policeman. Thank you sir!
This clearly shows there are innocent people behind bars.
My sister 46yr old single working mother was arrested a few weeks ago for literally no reason. That cop pulled her over for a headlight out for the full intention to arrest her at any cost. He said he smelled booze and then she blew a 0, then he claimed it was pot and searched her car found nothing. She hadn't smoked in her car but even if they smelled it she has a medical card.the cops arrested her and stated she was "too happy" report said "Carefree inhibitions". 500$ bond for a dui strickly on the cops word after passing every single test
You absolutely have zero idea on the amount of shithousary that goes on every day, our method of learning through trail and error in the real world experience is crazy, cooked..
Much respect for the police who really wanted to know. God bless you.
Thank you both so much for being true to your job, and for being fair and diligent.
God bless you both Sirs.
Excellent work Sergeant Inlow.
So, what you are saying is that the Test companies need to be sued into oblivion.
No,the corrupt police do for knowing this happens time and time again and still arrests for it.see the cat litter guy for example.lunacy.
Wowww - Kudos to the Sargent. Respect!!
He needs a raise
Respect to the officer / Top man
This is how the police need to investigate
THANK YOU, OFFICER FOR BEING DILIGENT!!!!! YOU ARE VERY MUCH APPRECIATED!!!!!! 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
Thank you Sgt.
Good to know that the test they use to send you to jail can be wrong, and your life can get ruined for no reason.
It's not that it's wrong, the reagent just detects a chemical found in both amphetamine and the sugar
@fusion3690 I would not call Spenda suger, it some artificial chemical stuff so that probably why it react rather then real suger.
@fusion3690;
So, it's NOT an amphetamine test, at all, it's a test for something found *with*, or a metabolite of...in short, it's too easy to end up with an arrest record, yep, even if not charged, you still have an arrest record, so, if it happens twice, officer #2 will see an arrest record as "evidence" that you're trouble!
@@lohikarhu734 No chemical test is going to be perfect, if you think it will be your simply delusional
Same test put a man who ate crispy clean glazed donuts in jail and all kinds of problems for 9 months until the real lab said yeah it was glazing from donuts.
His wife divorced him, his job fired him. He didn't get his job back, but he did sue them and got something like $120,000.
Then he sued the cops and I never heard how that went.
only few people has this kind of heart and understanding, God bless you Sergeant, continue the good deeds
This is good police work and it is the standard but too many police are racist and substandard.
Massive respect for this Police Sgt, ‘common sense Policing’. Unfortunately “common sense, is not so common”. ‘Voltaire’ 1764.
That sgt should be awarded.
Being diligent and thorough in your job is what makes for good results and respect. Kudos to him.
Well, I won’t be using any Splenda after this!
@@ladyfame1430 I asked my doctor about this. He said we don't know what they are using and putting in there to make artificial sweeteners, but we can assume from this video that anything "artificial" is not always the best thing to eat or drink. I'm diabetes 2 and he said if I need to sweeten things, limited amounts of sugar are better than artificial stuff. I trust Dr. Groff. So, I'm done with artificial sweeteners and additives. Of course, it's up to each one of us what we decide to put, or not put, into our bodies.
Thank you Sergeant ❤
May the Lord Jesus touch and bless this man tremendously❤
Respect to sgt inlow.
Well played Sergeant Inlow...total respect.
A true sergeant.
Lesson: Keep your shit in its _original package,_ or risk criminal charges.