Best of Roland JX-3P Synthesizer ~ RetroSound Demo

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 янв 2025

Комментарии • 51

  • @pronzac
    @pronzac Год назад +4

    How I miss these good vibes! However they've already become evergreen.

  • @retrosound72
    @retrosound72  Год назад +5

    Setlist
    0:06 Intro
    0:18 Analogous
    1:00 Bittersweet
    1:33 Pulsator
    1:38 1983
    2:12 JX Pad
    2:28 December 83
    2:54 Deep Bass
    3:03 Life Cycles
    3:32 Sample/Hold
    3:45 Sweet Wave
    3:51 Talking JX
    4:04 Analog Wave
    4:12 Berlin Night
    4:32 Diva
    4:38 The Lab
    5:00 Retrowave
    5:19 Shy
    5:26 Doctor
    5:34 Axel
    5:41 Life
    5:51 Drive
    6:01 Nice
    6:09 Happy
    6:16 Forever

  • @Peter_S_
    @Peter_S_ Год назад +4

    So many beautiful 80s textures. Juno's two oscillator cousin. Such a wonderful machine. The same soul lives in the GR-700 guitar synth and the MSK-30 rack unit.
    From the factory the design is a little more tame, but recalibration to the wild side is very possible. This synth is a monster which hides in plain sight.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад +1

      agree with you Peter.
      A wonderful synth with a wide range of classic analog sounds.
      Thank you for your time

  • @thefool2007
    @thefool2007 Год назад +4

    You really know how to get the most out of that synth. It has a lush, early 80's vibe and sounds awesome. It's a shame it really needs the programmer to get the most out of it but it has it where it counts. Nice demo as always (some choice sounds).

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад

      Thank you so much Rick. I really appreciate it.🎹🙌

  • @retrosound72
    @retrosound72  Год назад +11

    The Roland JX-3P Synthesizer from the year 1983 is a fantastic analog synth with the typical 80s sound. Here can you find the full JX-3P playlist with single sound demos and one synth demo tracks. Enjoy.
    The JX-3P playlist ----> ruclips.net/p/PLe08Lbpy8pPbP4nDTixpdCwIJEwtfpmYw

  • @BboySalamon
    @BboySalamon Год назад +1

    Thanks a lot! 1983 forever herr Ettlich.👍💪💣💥🔥

  • @DX5
    @DX5 Год назад +2

    Excellent, and the Programmer is a nice addition

  • @michaelmitchell8218
    @michaelmitchell8218 Год назад +2

    Such a great sounding synth, never knew of this one before until I saw it on your channel a while ago. Still can’t understand how this one slip me by. Was it over shadowed by the Jupiters and junos ? Love the sounds of this, but I find Roland never disappoint in this area. Keep meaning to read up more on this synth and what songs it was used in by groups. Once again you blow me away with your skills and is always a pleasure to watch your channel and can’t wait until what you show us next, maybe the emulator 2 lol. Top channel by a top man and thanks for sharing your beautiful collection with us, it’s very appreciated and thank you.

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад +1

      Thank you so much for your time Michael. I appreciate it a lot. The JX3p is a downgrade Jupiter8. But in the shadow. A very versatile synthesizer with the typical classic 80s sound.

  • @gregbrookman
    @gregbrookman Год назад +1

    My first synth. 30 years ago this Xmas!

  • @christophercassel1001
    @christophercassel1001 Год назад +1

    Was soll uns diese klasse Demo sagen:
    1. Die JX Synthies von Roland werden und wurden total unterschätzt
    2. auch ohne Prophet bekommt man einen passablen Sync- Sound hin
    3. vllt gibt es ja bald einen Retrosound Best of 80er Mix😎 Die passende Hardware und Muße hast du ja dafür
    Danke für die Demo

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад

      Vielen lieben Dank für die schönen Worte. Das freut mich natürlich sehr. Der kleine JX ist wirklich extrem unterschätzt im Vergleich zum Jupiter 8 aber auch zum Juno60. Zu Unrecht finde ich. Er ist sehr vielseitig und mit Programmer macht er enorm Spass.

  • @mimoochodom2684
    @mimoochodom2684 Год назад +1

    Versatile bit of kit.👍

  • @RobertoGinsburg
    @RobertoGinsburg Год назад +1

    This synth was used by Fabián Bonn in the Festival de Viña del Mar (Chile) of the argentinian band #SodaStereo in February 1987.

  • @agnostiker09
    @agnostiker09 Год назад +1

    Tolles Gerät ... mit dem durfte ich auch mal Ende der 80er spielen. Da kann man recht einfach Sounds generieren. Hat viel Spaß gemacht. (Noch einfacher ist es natürlich mit dem Programmer).

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад

      Ein sehr vielseitiger Synthesizer. Der kleine Bruder des Jupiter 8

  • @brainhamster
    @brainhamster Год назад +1

    My first synth, and still my favourite of them.
    Never bothered with the pg200...couldn't afford it, so i learned to program without

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад +1

      Yes you can easy program without programmer. Great synth. Thank you for watching

  • @jarisroth
    @jarisroth Год назад +1

    Fantastic job!!!

  • @AledeParana
    @AledeParana Год назад +1

    ¡Excellent!

  • @J._Campbell
    @J._Campbell Год назад +1

    Great job! Спасибо!

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад +1

      Спасибо мой друг.🎹👍

  • @benjaminnourri
    @benjaminnourri Год назад +2

    C'est bon ce son

  • @neworder80
    @neworder80 Год назад +1

    precisamente hoy ha sacado roland el intrumento virtual de este sinte

  • @gula_rata
    @gula_rata 11 месяцев назад

    Your synths are retro of course. But are your effects gear and sequencers retro too ? What effectors and sequencers is this?

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  11 месяцев назад

      I use Roland SRV2000 and some old EHX pedals

  • @peterream9437
    @peterream9437 Год назад +1

    Alphavile and a nod to Rick from the Cars....

  • @Shred_The_Weapon
    @Shred_The_Weapon Год назад +1

    Is it true or false that the 3p is not equipped with cross modulation?

  • @amonster8mymother
    @amonster8mymother Год назад +1

    How much for the vocoder?

  • @falangistavaleroso9689
    @falangistavaleroso9689 Год назад +1

    106 or jx 3p? choose one

    • @retrosound72
      @retrosound72  Год назад +3

      Not easy. More versatile is the JX. But only with programmer. The Juno has a deeper sound

    • @falangistavaleroso9689
      @falangistavaleroso9689 Год назад

      i have never handled a jx, had 3 106 and never convinced me, i want the 60.@@retrosound72

    • @autoy
      @autoy Год назад +1

      I like the DCOs in the JX3P better but I prefer the filter sound of the 106 by a large margin. The 106 has better bass too. Chorus is very similar between both. Overall the 3P is more versatile and also has an amazing poly sequencer. The 106 will do less but more magical imo.

    • @falangistavaleroso9689
      @falangistavaleroso9689 Год назад

      I never liked my 106, but the filter, yes. The chorus is noisy as hell. @@autoy

    • @autoy
      @autoy Год назад +1

      @@falangistavaleroso9689 of course but there's drop in modern replacements for the chorus chips if they get too bad. BTW the JX-3P gas exactly the same chorus chips as the 106, just with a different dialled depth.