@@FusionCoreHoarder You ever watch "White Tiger" in russian Белый тигр Belyy Tigr? It is quite a weird movie, but it's enjoyable. Also "in August of 1944" was a decent film. Lots of old vehicles and the uniforms look good.
@@HerzogVonMartian I watched White Tiger, yeah. The action scenes were fun to watch, but not much else I will check out In August 1944 this weekend, thank you for the recomendation
@@alexanddraw_800 Lots of slow mo skill shots. Still a very fun movie, though. For what it is worth, and considering the country that made it, it is surprisingly balanced.
@@VRichardsn and the country that has made it knows how to make great, balanced and historically correct movies. Unlike some other countries that shall not be named who can only make up bs about other countries and spread their ridiculous propaganda 🙃
@@alexanddraw_800 I'd put this movie's plot on the level of "Eagle Has Landed"s level of ridiculousness. It doesn't mean either one is bad movie so chill, they're just not believable. Like fantasy movies.
Imagine that even the Luftwaffe on the Eastern Front wore beards. But this is an exception, of course. But it was. You can find archival photographs if you are not too lazy.
@@evghenigordienco7915 that’s not the point - this is pure BS propaganda and a stupid typical stereotype. If you were not too lazy and thick you also would know this
Yes. But Pz III and what may be 38's are out of service in '44. Maybe used by other Axis forces, but not given to an experienced German commander such as this. Still fun, but not accurate.
@@matthewhudson5685 But that was an early T-34 with the 76mm gun, so Pzkw III was a contemporary early on. But yes, if the scene took place in 44, then it's pretty wrong. Generally there were always way more Soviets than Germans, and tanks without infantry is also nuts. Finally, a German flag on the tank, presumably to prevent friendly fire losses.... the Luftwaffe basically played no role in the east. German soldiers said that one thing was true of anything in the air: it wasn't Luftwaffe.
@@331SVTCobra All good points. The Tank-on Tank only battles drive me nuts! And the constant acceleration, swerving, charging, shooting sideways on the move - Sooooo video game!
It's been some time since I watched this movie but I believe this combat takes place during the first days of war on the Eastern Front, around 1941, that's why there are many Pz III and a 1941 model? T-34. And the rest of the movie, the Panthers pursuing the T-34/85 takes place in 1944 or so.
This is genuinely one of my favorite tank movies, just for this scene alone. It's a good movie in regards to the ambush and general tank combat scenes.
It appears that WWll was the last war in which troops of any nation wore uniforms that were either traditional or copies of traditional uniforms with all the elaborate embroidery. Take look at the German tank commander. That uniform would have been out of place today. Everything now is strictly camo and practicality.
As nasty and repulsive as the germans may have been I will always claim that they had the drippiest outfits of the war, specifically when it came to officers and tank crew. Flecktarn is also an S tier camo even into the modern age.
I think it adds charachter. If it were silent, it would come off as too artsy-fartsy and full of itself. Grungy guitar music like this is also reminicant of the post apocalyptic / sci fi theme stories like Metro went for, rather than over the top propogandic nationalistic music.
Interesting note: driver seems to have Ukrainian accent and mannerisms - which I thought was a nice touch, since there were a lot of non-Russians like Kazakhs, Ukrainians, etc in the USSR, which is not often shown!
They are driving right into a village, seemingly deserted, and a barn or structure (correction, several structure) is off to the left with ambush written all over it, and they don't back off or immediately fire into it. the T-34 already had their range.
@@sylvananas7923I mean calling it propaganda is a little extreme I mean hell any person with a pretty average grasp of ww2 tank engagements can tell this isn’t accurate at all…. But it is pretty damn cool
@@OverG88 Nah Furry is damn silly at times, especially in the fight vs the tiger where they both bounce shells at point blank I mean the movie is very cliché, like the panzer commander alone feels like a cartoon vilain bro got the damn nazi flag on his tank
@@sylvananas7923 Well, the Luftwaffe was hardly perfect in their target identification at the time, so...Allied tanks late in the war carried identification panels to avoid accidental attacks, this guy is just improvising.
By the film the commander is Russian. The gunner is Ukrainian. The driver is Belorussian. The crew machinegun shooter is Russian. They speaks everybody his own language and understand each other without problems, because our languages are very similar. Sometimes they jokes on the language of another member of the crew to troll each other (they uses some frazes from the poetry and folk songs). Also the serious man outside with Shpagin machine gun is Georgian (as well as Stalin). Sometimes he speaks Georgian.
fun fact: we were a big united country till 1990-s, and only together, russians, ukrainians, belorussians. georgians, jews and other nationalities could win that war
Its available for free on RUclips. Best watched with an Adblock enabled. No Russian dubbed over the German dialogue and the subtitles make a little more sense
@@richardsamuelgustavo Makes sense but wouldnt it be cheaper to simply put russian subtitles then? Especially since the movie is a russian production if I am not mistaken
@@AnCol1801The armor would have still triggered the fuse. If it was solid shot it would have diverted the round into a different direction and not made enough damage to the first tank but to qualify it as being taken out.
Though this movie is about war between Germany and Soviet Union, the German officer was portrayed as not an evil Nazi, but a cool guy in this movie. That was quite surprising...
tbh, this one, plus both the east german and russian versions of Stalingrad, showed some germans were decent folk, only western movie ive seen like that was saints and soldiers but that got basically no advertising
Я из Челябинска, мне одноклассница рассказывала, как ее бабушку будучи 8 летней девочкой немецкий офицер шоколадом угощал- это было на Украине в Новой Каховке. Видимо у него в Германии тоже были дети и жизнь эту он хорошо понимал. Простые люди не хотят воевать, люди во всем мире хотят примерно одного… В общем и Уралом такая история.
@@РядовойКуча-я6й не распростаняй чушь про "бабушек одноклассницы" из Н.Каховки! Война была исключительно лютая! Вне зависимости от частностей на местах, в случае поражения Союза, все его выжившие граждане позавидовали бы мёртвым! Где голод, вероятно был бы самым простым из лишений. ЧИТАЙТЕ КНИГИ - пожалуйста.
😂😂😂 ответь мне, о один из трех углов- каким образом "нищая" армия умудряется челдосить ваши "непобедимые" армады, поставляемые шумерам?😂 Вы реально aptal (тур.)😁
@@potapotapov Наверное, самое обидное для генералов "второй армии мира", обладавших перед началом вторжения подавляющим военным превосходством и оружием, "аналогов которому в мире нет", что ее выносят с помощью вооружений прошлого тысячелетия. Это и старые советские танки Т-72, вертолеты Ми-17 и советские снаряды, которые передали бывшие страны Варшавского договора. И старые боевые системы НАТО Гранатометы «Карл Густав» - 1948 год. Гранатометы M72 LAW - 1963 год. Бронетранспортер M113 и Humvee - 60-х годов. Немецкие "Гепарды" - 1973 год. Противокорабельные ракеты "Гарпун", которых так боится бесстрашный Черноморский флот - 1977 год. "Стингеры" - 1981 год. "Мистрали" - 1987 год. "Джавелины" - 1989 год. Ракеты ATACMS - 1991 год. Это же все еще при живом Советском Союзе было. Самоходные гаубицы PzH 2000 - 1998 год. ПЗРК Starstreak - 1997 год. Ракеты Brimstone - 1999 год. Гаубицы AHS Krab - 2000. Только HIMARS, ракеты «воздух-воздух» IRIS-T и 155-мм гаубица M777 новее - 2005 год. Да французские "Цезари" и беспилотники. Страшно представить что будет, если Украине передадут новейшие образцы вооружений. Например, беспилотники Reaper.
Because every tank in the platoon would light up whoever took the shot like a Christmas tree. Plus the next guy in line would take charge. So all you’ve done is replace the enemy commander with a very aware and cautious enemy commander who is probably very pissed off at you.
None of this makes sense. You don't push on a target with armor without an infantry at least probing the position. The dummy gun premise is legit, but that 34 would have been discovered off the rip. It was common procedure to pepper haystacks with mgs to see if they were concealing anything.
@@rustyshacklfur2637 it's possible... read somewhere that the germans were so fast in their advance thru the USSR that many times infantry could not keep up, in some cases they would just bypass enemy entrenched in some towns that were deemed of lesser strategic value.
I don't know everything about German WWII tank tactics, but I highly doubt they would have humped a tank column without scouts and infantry support into a town that appeared to be cleared out. If they were that stupid, they would not have taken nearly as much of Europe as they did. Hiding the tank in the haystack was a smart way to get one shot on the German column. The hay offered no protection and the flash would have given away their position on the first shot. There is about a 500% probability that would have drawn fire from multiple Panzers faster than they could back up and retreat. People below talk about "Fury." That was a good movie, but it had some unrealism too. The scene in the field where the machinegun nests were set up in the open even though there were thick woods or hedgerows behind them was cinematically a cool looking scene, but the Germans were masters at shooting from locations that couldn't be seen. The only protection the nests would have had from the American 75mm tank guns would have been to hide deep enough in the woods that the gun flashes couldn't be seen. The concept of "if you can see your enemy, he can see you" was well known at that point.
Yes, this took place during Operation Barbarossa and the Russians were reeling back from the German invasion and its winter and the Germans are almost at the gates of Moscow.
Good action movie, but unrealistic. A) an armored column would always have half-tracks with panzergrenadiers, or a motorcycle reckon detachment. It would be their job to scout out the village under cover form the panzers. B) a single armor piercing round going through two turrets (even on their side)? Is there an example or testimony to that? C) was the German commander transferred from the U-boat service? What's up with the beard?
@@AnCol1801 ?????? Зимой под москвой могли оказаться самые сильные модификации танка Pz3 Н или J . У первого лоб 30мм ( бывали с экраном + 30мм) у второго 50мм. На танке Т-34 могла оказаться пушка как Л-11 так и Ф-34 ( учитывая что калиберный бронебойный снаряд пробил 3 легких танка всё таки была Ф-34) Калиберный тупоголовый бронебойный снаряд Бр-350а с дистанции 100м пробивал 80-89мм брони при угле встречи в 60 градусов. Так какие проблемы могли быть у пушки Ф-34 с бронёй в 50мм?????
@@shtoltzvahtenberg2949 T-34s were on paper a decent enough of a tank. In practice they were terrible, mainly due to massive cost cutting measure done in factories such as a really big being most gunner's and commander's sights were just extremely well polished metal. With another major cost cutting measure being the fact that only the commander's tank have a short ranged radio to really only signal to the local HQ. The most common example of such is a vast majority (even persisting in post-war production) is armor welds being done so bad that if the absolutely trash tier quality of the armor plating didn't shatter in 4-5 hits from HE rounds then the welds would come apart first. P.S. the t-34 wasn't a 1930s tank, it was originally a 1941 design that got very minor upgrades by 1946 before being phased out very quickly. I will say however the IS-2 was actually a pretty good overall tank. T-34 was hot trash though.
@@dragonace119the T 34 is the best tank of the war, if anything, it's a complete lie about the sight, it was one of the best, go to Kubinka in the Moscow region, there is a full fleet of equipment, with a detailed description.
@@LIsForLexi. It doesn't take lots of tank battle experience to know these are unrealistic in many places. Pick up a history book, read about how tank battles often actually played out. There's things these movies get right, but there's a helluva lot they get wrong too, or choose to over exaggerate on purpose more likely.
Mate why would the Russians spend so much time fortifying a small village of really no importance, the germans probably have the entire area surrounded anyway. They could have prob already sent scouts to investigate and found nothing. And they could have been wrong however. The germans also wouldnt send scouts during day its more appropriate to do so during night
Just watched this movie last night. I love the clear visuals of this movie so much! The movie also portrayed the atrocities of german officers at that time really well as well!
this movie is pure propaganda and soviet indoctrination. It ignored the Russian Atrocities and Mass-Human very well and pretended that the Soviet Regime cared about its Human Resources.
There is a movie mistake thats not easy to pick up. The T34 turret hatch above the commander is round, like in a 1943 version. But its a 1941 T34. Later on, when ivutschkin exits the tank after the battle is over, you can see that it is round. Kinda curious why they didn't use the 1941 T34 for filming. To me the T34 they use for exterior shots looks real. So why film the inside scenes in a 1943 T34?😂
based on war thunder experience, every pz 2 and halftrack gonna get smeared by the biasmachine. But i sure wish the game had the kill cameras made shell porn like this, at least for paid premium users
Where have you seen movies that don't localize main actors because they are supposed to be "foreign"? This is ridiculous! - I don't know what's your mother tongue is, let's suppose it is English. Do you know many "three musketeers" or "asterix and obelix" movies where all the dialogues are released to american theatres in French w eng.subs?
@@kosiak10851 Films with subtitles are incredibly common. An american tank film would have the german officer speak exclusively in german with subtitles, or have his actor speak english, with no dubbing over. Even if they did dub him over, they'd remove the actual actor's voice in post.
Early Soviet campaign the T34/76 was actually better than most of the German tanks. It's only matching battle tank was the Panzer IV with the long 75mm high velocity gun. Unfortunately for the Germans over 2/3 of the Panzer IVs upon the initial invasion of Russia were still outfitted with the short stubby low velocity 75mm meant for HE and infantry support. The Panzer IIIs with the 37mm and 50mm were also outmatched. German high command had actually warned Hitler about the need for up-gunning the Panzer IV to long barreled high velocity 75s: they'd noticed shortcomings during the France campaign. Hitler wasn't willing to wait another year for retrofitting all the IVs though, or for the continuing development of the Panzer V. By Fall German command also noted the need for wider tracks to combat the Russian mud bogging down tanks. Fortunately for the Germans Russian command was so mismanaged and their tanks so poorly deployed it helped negate the advantages of the t34/76, and by the next year the high velocity 75mm was excellent at killing the t34, though I'd still class the t34 and Panzer IV as an equal matchup.
The shell ricochet because the angle was slanted making the armor even more tough than straight ahead or at the side like a deer 😢that was a great detail
@@ianross806 It makes sense they'd have it out when they're maneuvering in a column. Your camouflage isn't gonna do you much good if you're making a lot of noise driving down a built up road with a bunch of other allied tanks. They'd certainly have taken it down if the circumstances called for it. Yeah in this scene it's doing the work of telling us who the bad guys are. Not that unrealistic tho.
@@danielivanov439 It reminds me of a National Geographic special on the Battle of Midway. One of the dive bomber pilots interviewed said it wasn't hard to identify the Japanese carriers. There was a great big red meatball painted on the forward elevator. Here we are!
When you read the books of the New Testament you have probably asked yourself many times: "Why is it that for 2000 years we have not seen the miracles that accompanied the Church of Christ in the first century as the New Testament describes them? Why is it that so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed, while atheists have the audacity to deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Church of Christ ceased to exist after the first century. There is no Church as it is described in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other Christian sects, claiming to be the Church, but not having that one thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic only for the Church of Christ - the backing of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mk 16:15-20). That is why part of the researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and part of them do not mind to declare Him a real person, but an ordinary philosopher, a teacher. But even if Jesus was an ordinary philosopher, His disciples would have been ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not have dared to write about the miracles that not only Jesus but also His disciples could perform. If in our time there were a Church as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed - healing the sick, prophesying, raising the dead - no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then all over the world there would be the same disputes as in the first century - Jesus is the Son of God or a false prophet who seduces the world with miracles. Find on youtube the audio message *"The Mystery of the Church of Christ"* . It reveals the prophecy of the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the End of the World, giving hope to all who are sincerely seeking God and who are not lazy to think freely.
Nice production values.... too bad this movie along with a whole bunch others are just orc propaganda portraying how they single-handedly defeated Germany in WW2.
Literally 80% of Germans died on the Eastern Front, they didn't single handedly do it but it was very close, and before you toot the land lease horn, it only amounted to 4% of all the Soviet material of the war. They had incredible amount of factories in the Urals, Siberia, Caucasus and such.
You need to learn about the Eastern Front boy, you obviously don't know jack shit about it. Germans broke there after Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk and were on a constant retreat from there on. Nobody denies that Western Allies had one part to do with the victory against Germany but compared to the Eastern Front it was crap
Never ask Pewdiepie who’s he working for between 1949-1945
*1939
1949? Are u stupid? xd
TENET.
@zvezda4701?
@zvezda4701 Sir, as your lawyer, I do suggest you to finish the sentence for they will be used against you in the court.
Can we just stop for a second to appreciate how good was the russian translator of the german commander? 🤣
Okay, but the subtitles suck, "You don't aim for the forehead!" ?!? In this case forehead is the same word for the frontal armor...
Doesn't the Russian driver say he can't see behind him?
@@Ralphieboyперевод верен: « В лоб»
Именно там мы и говорим «в лоб» так быстрее, некогда выстраивать целые предложения
@@РядовойКуча-я6й If you mean it in the sense of immediately and directly, you would say "head on" rather than "in the forehead".
@@mjpraetorian4386 no, he says that there is dirt under the tank, so the tank drives slowly, adding swear words about the commander’s mother)))
The German Officer looks like PewdiePie
For real
“What’s goin on bros, my name is pewwwwwdiepi- AGH! WHO JUST FIRED A SHELL TOWARDS MY TANK!?”
@@Bobafett-lc2vx Marzia, is that yo-
UUURRRRRAAAAAA
What film is that
@@teckelshuntingandgoldfinch108 T-34
Never ask
a man: his sallery
A woman: her weight
PewDiePie: what he did in 1942
acktually, it's 1944, read the video's description :🤓
@@yosefyonin6824 it's movie s prehistory, actually winter 41 )) attempt to overtake Moscow
@@yosefyonin6824 он в 1942м начал бороду отращивать
This was a surprisingly fun movie. It gets ridiculous in some parts, but seeing WWII tanks fight is always cool.
Yeah reminds me of Fury
@@HerzogVonMartianRussian's version of Fury, for real
@@FusionCoreHoarder You ever watch "White Tiger" in russian Белый тигр Belyy Tigr?
It is quite a weird movie, but it's enjoyable.
Also "in August of 1944" was a decent film.
Lots of old vehicles and the uniforms look good.
@@HerzogVonMartian I watched White Tiger, yeah. The action scenes were fun to watch, but not much else
I will check out In August 1944 this weekend, thank you for the recomendation
@@FusionCoreHoarder it's a kind of detective story, it's a bit long but the pay off is pretty decent in my opinion.
some great tense scenes.
German tanks with winter colors are really magnificient !
Take it easy Hitler lol
Yea white Panzers just look so sick
And they even burn beautiful!
Yeah, fully camouflaged. But then someone put a big red flag on top of the turret :)
French troop did not have a change to see it.
Pewdiepie was a German officer 💀💀💀
the bridge makes sense now
@@tigre7303 the random ass comments with few likes are always the best
must be his grandfather
@freedomvoice8883and the Americans would lose if they didn't drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and then Japan continues the war
In his previous life😂😂
The movie was somewhat ridiculous but i loved how detailed the cgi equipment was.
And what is ridiculous about it?
@@alexanddraw_800 Lots of slow mo skill shots.
Still a very fun movie, though. For what it is worth, and considering the country that made it, it is surprisingly balanced.
just another ignorance
@@VRichardsn and the country that has made it knows how to make great, balanced and historically correct movies. Unlike some other countries that shall not be named who can only make up bs about other countries and spread their ridiculous propaganda 🙃
@@alexanddraw_800 I'd put this movie's plot on the level of "Eagle Has Landed"s level of ridiculousness. It doesn't mean either one is bad movie so chill, they're just not believable. Like fantasy movies.
Why is the German tank commander wearing a beard like he's a U-boat captain 5 months at sea?
Because it's a russian propaganda movie..
Imagine that even the Luftwaffe on the Eastern Front wore beards. But this is an exception, of course. But it was.
You can find archival photographs if you are not too lazy.
Because this is naive ruSSian propaganda fairy story.
Check "Kama tank school".
@@evghenigordienco7915 that’s not the point - this is pure BS propaganda and a stupid typical stereotype. If you were not too lazy and thick you also would know this
Kurt kipsner
3:24 imagine getting called a duckling because of the size of your tank, right before you die, thats such a violation
That's like actually abuse, you can claim for that.
Seeing German tanks other than Tigers in a WW2 movie is refreshing.
Yes. But Pz III and what may be 38's are out of service in '44.
Maybe used by other Axis forces, but not given to an experienced German commander such as this.
Still fun, but not accurate.
@@matthewhudson5685 But that was an early T-34 with the 76mm gun, so Pzkw III was a contemporary early on. But yes, if the scene took place in 44, then it's pretty wrong. Generally there were always way more Soviets than Germans, and tanks without infantry is also nuts. Finally, a German flag on the tank, presumably to prevent friendly fire losses.... the Luftwaffe basically played no role in the east. German soldiers said that one thing was true of anything in the air: it wasn't Luftwaffe.
@@331SVTCobra All good points.
The Tank-on Tank only battles drive me nuts!
And the constant acceleration, swerving, charging, shooting sideways on the move - Sooooo video game!
It's been some time since I watched this movie but I believe this combat takes place during the first days of war on the Eastern Front, around 1941, that's why there are many Pz III and a 1941 model? T-34. And the rest of the movie, the Panthers pursuing the T-34/85 takes place in 1944 or so.
@matthewhudson5685 this battle takes place during the winter of 1941, operation barbarossa has just taken place
pewdiepie has transcended into a real gamer
The guy inside Russian tank with moustache looks like between Dr.Disrespect and Freddie Mercury.
So essentially Freddy Disrespect.
)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
The guy with the mustache speaks Ukrainian. Now such moustaches are sitting in tanks on the other side
@@ОлегСкипин-л8э its Belarusian!
@@Michael.Blackwood hard to tell if that's better or "Doctor Mercury"
The german tank commander is a spitting image of Jürgen Prochnow
I was thinking PewDiePie lol.
100%
He looks like knispel
More like Kurt knispel tbh
Yeah totally! I was so confused. Had to double check if maybe Jürgen Prochnow found the fountain of youth
This is genuinely one of my favorite tank movies, just for this scene alone. It's a good movie in regards to the ambush and general tank combat scenes.
It appears that WWll was the last war in which troops of any nation wore uniforms that were either traditional or copies of traditional uniforms with all the elaborate embroidery. Take look at the German tank commander. That uniform would have been out of place today. Everything now is strictly camo and practicality.
Its because the Germans had style .and Hugo Boss..
As nasty and repulsive as the germans may have been I will always claim that they had the drippiest outfits of the war, specifically when it came to officers and tank crew. Flecktarn is also an S tier camo even into the modern age.
@itsrockyiv8209 No, they were the good guys
That's because today we want to survive the fight, and survival often means not being seen.
The camouflage uniform looks very practical in parades and in everyday life.
Such a good movie! I love that it doesn't treat the Germans as too comically evil, entertaining combat and good actors overall
I wish these types of movies didn’t have music, just the rumbling and screeching of tank tracks and engines
I think it adds charachter. If it were silent, it would come off as too artsy-fartsy and full of itself.
Grungy guitar music like this is also reminicant of the post apocalyptic / sci fi theme stories like Metro went for, rather than over the top propogandic nationalistic music.
reminds me of the scene with the tanks in Saving Private Ryan.
Interesting note: driver seems to have Ukrainian accent and mannerisms - which I thought was a nice touch, since there were a lot of non-Russians like Kazakhs, Ukrainians, etc in the USSR, which is not often shown!
Gosh i love panzer 3 . Sad that its rare to see in movies
Tell me I'm not the only person who saw PewDiePie in the Thumbnail.
It's his great grandpa PewDieStreusel
thats the bridge pewdiepie right there
Pewdiepie going "pew pew pew"
They are driving right into a village, seemingly deserted, and a barn or structure (correction, several structure) is off to the left with ambush written all over it, and they don't back off or immediately fire into it. the T-34 already had their range.
DOn't bother with logic this movie is basically propaganda and not much else, still is nice to see ww2 tanks being used but that's about it
@@sylvananas7923I mean calling it propaganda is a little extreme I mean hell any person with a pretty average grasp of ww2 tank engagements can tell this isn’t accurate at all…. But it is pretty damn cool
@@sylvananas7923 LMAO! And Fury is a historical accuracy. On the other hand, early T-34 was more than capable to destroy Panzer.
@@OverG88 Nah Furry is damn silly at times, especially in the fight vs the tiger where they both bounce shells at point blank
I mean the movie is very cliché, like the panzer commander alone feels like a cartoon vilain bro got the damn nazi flag on his tank
@@sylvananas7923 Well, the Luftwaffe was hardly perfect in their target identification at the time, so...Allied tanks late in the war carried identification panels to avoid accidental attacks, this guy is just improvising.
Fun fact: The driver and commander and gunner spoke Ukrainian at the beginning.
это не украинский, это суржик. Смесь русского и украинского.
By the film the commander is Russian. The gunner is Ukrainian. The driver is Belorussian. The crew machinegun shooter is Russian. They speaks everybody his own language and understand each other without problems, because our languages are very similar. Sometimes they jokes on the language of another member of the crew to troll each other (they uses some frazes from the poetry and folk songs). Also the serious man outside with Shpagin machine gun is Georgian (as well as Stalin). Sometimes he speaks Georgian.
@@ВиталийКоротков-м8ч Huh, that's interesting i never knew that. Thanks for telling me!
@@ВиталийКоротков-м8ч Thanks mate, good input. Sadly, belorussian is not exactly well portrayed. Wrong spelling, wrong accent.
fun fact: we were a big united country till 1990-s, and only together, russians, ukrainians, belorussians. georgians, jews and other nationalities could win that war
Its available for free on RUclips. Best watched with an Adblock enabled. No Russian dubbed over the German dialogue and the subtitles make a little more sense
Movie name?
@@RhamJacobNakpilT34
What tanks were the russians using before they got captured?
Early t34/76
I think it’s a 1941 model t-34 76
Ok, they had 18 miles of fuel to start the exercise. Why are they still going? It's a good movie but translation is off
It was Pewdiepie's Panzer grandfather who made him drop the N-word
One thing I dont understand is why this russian movie put a voice over subtiled german dialogue
yes, it's really annoying
it wasn't subtitled in russian so how would they understand german
@@richardsamuelgustavo Makes sense but wouldnt it be cheaper to simply put russian subtitles then? Especially since the movie is a russian production if I am not mistaken
@@mushoddiq7631 it completely destroys the innersion
Basic Russian TV Regulations
legends say the german officer moved to japan when the war ended
I like fairy tales! One shot - two tanks!
Filmmakers also love fairy tales.
это самонаводящий)
Теоретически это возможно - броня первых немецких танков была картонная и легко пробивалась 76-мм снарядом Т-34-76
@@AnCol1801 Oh, yes! One shot - THREE tanks!
@@AnCol1801The armor would have still triggered the fuse. If it was solid shot it would have diverted the round into a different direction and not made enough damage to the first tank but to qualify it as being taken out.
Though this movie is about war between Germany and Soviet Union, the German officer was portrayed as not an evil Nazi, but a cool guy in this movie.
That was quite surprising...
tbh, this one, plus both the east german and russian versions of Stalingrad, showed some germans were decent folk, only western movie ive seen like that was saints and soldiers but that got basically no advertising
Cmon, he did look a bit shifty and unsettled. The Soviets were much more wholesome....
Я из Челябинска, мне одноклассница рассказывала, как ее бабушку будучи 8 летней девочкой немецкий офицер шоколадом угощал- это было на Украине в Новой Каховке. Видимо у него в Германии тоже были дети и жизнь эту он хорошо понимал. Простые люди не хотят воевать, люди во всем мире хотят примерно одного…
В общем и Уралом такая история.
@@РядовойКуча-я6й не распростаняй чушь про "бабушек одноклассницы" из Н.Каховки! Война была исключительно лютая! Вне зависимости от частностей на местах, в случае поражения Союза, все его выжившие граждане позавидовали бы мёртвым! Где голод, вероятно был бы самым простым из лишений.
ЧИТАЙТЕ КНИГИ - пожалуйста.
Unearthed another tank battle ,Johnny...good slow motion photography...thanks for sharing, sir...cheers...E...😊😊😊
It’s crazy how Russia put more in their movies budget than in their own invading armies
Эти псы ещё за убитых детей Луганска ответят.Украинский нацизм будет уничтожен!
Yet, I don't see Ukrainians frolicking in the beaches of Crimea after all the gazillions they got from the US and NATO. I wonder why?
More money than in their schools, hospitals and modern canalization systems.
😂😂😂 ответь мне, о один из трех углов- каким образом "нищая" армия умудряется челдосить ваши "непобедимые" армады, поставляемые шумерам?😂 Вы реально aptal (тур.)😁
@@potapotapov Наверное, самое обидное для генералов "второй армии мира", обладавших перед началом вторжения подавляющим военным превосходством и оружием, "аналогов которому в мире нет", что ее выносят с помощью вооружений прошлого тысячелетия. Это и старые советские танки Т-72, вертолеты Ми-17 и советские снаряды, которые передали бывшие страны Варшавского договора. И старые боевые системы НАТО
Гранатометы «Карл Густав» - 1948 год. Гранатометы M72 LAW - 1963 год. Бронетранспортер M113 и Humvee - 60-х годов. Немецкие "Гепарды" - 1973 год. Противокорабельные ракеты "Гарпун", которых так боится бесстрашный Черноморский флот - 1977 год. "Стингеры" - 1981 год. "Мистрали" - 1987 год. "Джавелины" - 1989 год. Ракеты ATACMS - 1991 год. Это же все еще при живом Советском Союзе было.
Самоходные гаубицы PzH 2000 - 1998 год. ПЗРК Starstreak - 1997 год. Ракеты Brimstone - 1999 год. Гаубицы AHS Krab - 2000.
Только HIMARS, ракеты «воздух-воздух» IRIS-T и 155-мм гаубица M777 новее - 2005 год. Да французские "Цезари" и беспилотники.
Страшно представить что будет, если Украине передадут новейшие образцы вооружений.
Например, беспилотники Reaper.
It's nice to see a movie where the germans aren't using only tigers and p09's, but the actually more popular panzer
Wonder why they did't put down the German Commander with a sniper?
57mm>7.62
Because every tank in the platoon would light up whoever took the shot like a Christmas tree. Plus the next guy in line would take charge. So all you’ve done is replace the enemy commander with a very aware and cautious enemy commander who is probably very pissed off at you.
There is no sniper lurking in every corner. Plus this was during Operation Barbarossa when the Russians where reeling back in retreat.
None of this makes sense. You don't push on a target with armor without an infantry at least probing the position. The dummy gun premise is legit, but that 34 would have been discovered off the rip. It was common procedure to pepper haystacks with mgs to see if they were concealing anything.
@@rustyshacklfur2637 it's possible... read somewhere that the germans were so fast in their advance thru the USSR that many times infantry could not keep up, in some cases they would just bypass enemy entrenched in some towns that were deemed of lesser strategic value.
I'm glad i'm not the only one to think the german commander looks like a non-shaven pewdiepie
I don't know everything about German WWII tank tactics, but I highly doubt they would have humped a tank column without scouts and infantry support into a town that appeared to be cleared out. If they were that stupid, they would not have taken nearly as much of Europe as they did. Hiding the tank in the haystack was a smart way to get one shot on the German column. The hay offered no protection and the flash would have given away their position on the first shot. There is about a 500% probability that would have drawn fire from multiple Panzers faster than they could back up and retreat.
People below talk about "Fury." That was a good movie, but it had some unrealism too. The scene in the field where the machinegun nests were set up in the open even though there were thick woods or hedgerows behind them was cinematically a cool looking scene, but the Germans were masters at shooting from locations that couldn't be seen. The only protection the nests would have had from the American 75mm tank guns would have been to hide deep enough in the woods that the gun flashes couldn't be seen. The concept of "if you can see your enemy, he can see you" was well known at that point.
You are right and you can even see it is the opposite. Russian losses in Ukraine are just mindblowing but they keep on going with that.
It's your standard Russian WW2 propaganda film, don't expect too much from it.
Yes the haystack is just concealment and not cover, also a tanker would never stop his tanks in the wide open like that in an unknown area.
"Fury" is a total bs and disaster, same as a vast majority of the Hollywood movies, especially the ending of it.
@@grimraz0r so true!
This movie would only be 30 min long without the slow motion.
In my mind, the Russians are always to good guys, fighting to defend mother Russia from the West.
Love the scruffy bearded German tank commander.
When shaving supplies are hard to come by.......
@@abc64pan while his soldiers are literally shaved... stop searching for excuses. This Movie really is just cheap Propaganda.
@@TheBlackfall234 о чём ты говоришь чёрт побери?! Отличный фильм!
@@TheBlackfall234 i'm crying waaaaa
@@ГалинаТуманова-ч4у Im talking about the fact that this movie is blatant soviet propaganda.
PewDiePie after taking the red pill.
T-34 das Duell. Einer der geilsten Kriegsfilme die ich gesehen habe. Besser geht's nicht.
Pewdiepie doesn't need to ask his grandfather what he did in the war, he just watches this movie.
The link you give does not correspond to this movie ...
The good news is that we will see more up-to-date war films with the T-34 in them soon.
Filme mit dem T90 "Durchbruch" 😂
Hahahahaha, I can't imagine tanks with snow camouflage, and with a red flag that can be distinguished from hundreds of meters
Чтоб с воздуха свои не долбанули!
Awesome movie
Is there a real story reference ?
Yeah. It's called 'Fury', from 2014, starring Brad Pitt and Jon Bernthal.
No
Yes
Yes, this took place during Operation Barbarossa and the Russians were reeling back from the German invasion and its winter and the Germans are almost at the gates of Moscow.
@@Britton_Thompsonlol after Fury came out the Russians came along and made their own knockoff version.
Good action movie, but unrealistic. A) an armored column would always have half-tracks with panzergrenadiers, or a motorcycle reckon detachment. It would be their job to scout out the village under cover form the panzers. B) a single armor piercing round going through two turrets (even on their side)? Is there an example or testimony to that? C) was the German commander transferred from the U-boat service? What's up with the beard?
the first turret was Panzer 2, the armor thickness was 15 mm, for a Russian 76 mm gun it was like paper
Great movie scene I have ever seen ❤
Самое забавное " ПУСТЬ ОТКРОЕТ БОРТ..." ))) Да весь показанный немецкий хлам для танка Т-34 это мишени на гусеницах в любой проэкции!!
Ну, лоб Pz lll, даже под небольшим углом, уже был проблематичен для 76мм снаряда Т-34/76
@@AnCol1801 ?????? Зимой под москвой могли оказаться самые сильные модификации танка Pz3 Н или J . У первого лоб 30мм ( бывали с экраном + 30мм) у второго 50мм.
На танке Т-34 могла оказаться пушка как Л-11 так и Ф-34 ( учитывая что калиберный бронебойный снаряд пробил 3 легких танка всё таки была Ф-34)
Калиберный тупоголовый бронебойный снаряд Бр-350а с дистанции 100м пробивал 80-89мм брони при угле встречи в 60 градусов.
Так какие проблемы могли быть у пушки Ф-34 с бронёй в 50мм?????
2:34 Ráharaptak?
Hogy került bele magyar szöveg a fordításba? / How did a hungarian word is in the translation?
In reality, most of the Russian tanks didn't have radios.
...at the beginning of World War II, right?
I take it you're talking about tanks from the 30s? I'll tell you a secret, even the Germans had the same radio communication.
@@shtoltzvahtenberg2949 T-34s were on paper a decent enough of a tank. In practice they were terrible, mainly due to massive cost cutting measure done in factories such as a really big being most gunner's and commander's sights were just extremely well polished metal. With another major cost cutting measure being the fact that only the commander's tank have a short ranged radio to really only signal to the local HQ. The most common example of such is a vast majority (even persisting in post-war production) is armor welds being done so bad that if the absolutely trash tier quality of the armor plating didn't shatter in 4-5 hits from HE rounds then the welds would come apart first.
P.S. the t-34 wasn't a 1930s tank, it was originally a 1941 design that got very minor upgrades by 1946 before being phased out very quickly. I will say however the IS-2 was actually a pretty good overall tank. T-34 was hot trash though.
@@dragonace119the T 34 is the best tank of the war, if anything, it's a complete lie about the sight, it was one of the best, go to Kubinka in the Moscow region, there is a full fleet of equipment, with a detailed description.
@@shtoltzvahtenberg2949 Oh your one of those types of people, yeah not much I can do to convince you then.
2:35 Hé haverom, elfelejtetted azt a szöveg részét lefordítani.
Both fury and this one are so unrealistic, especially this one. But ig at least the 2 look really good and are full of action
Fury have stick in it's ass and Germans act there like morons. T-34 don't pretend to be historially accurate ;) Fun popcorn flick.
Unrealistic? Do you have lots of tank battle experience?
@@LIsForLexi. It doesn't take lots of tank battle experience to know these are unrealistic in many places. Pick up a history book, read about how tank battles often actually played out. There's things these movies get right, but there's a helluva lot they get wrong too, or choose to over exaggerate on purpose more likely.
wait wait: so the german commander wears Wehrmacht-insignia but is also in the Totenkopf-SS?
It´s not a Totenkopf skull. Wehrmacht´s panzer forces used skull insignia but it is different than the one SS used.
Total B.S. These tanks would never roll into a small deserted town with out first sending scouts in to investigate.
Mate why would the Russians spend so much time fortifying a small village of really no importance, the germans probably have the entire area surrounded anyway. They could have prob already sent scouts to investigate and found nothing. And they could have been wrong however. The germans also wouldnt send scouts during day its more appropriate to do so during night
@@Mrbf1man Всегда есть факто халатности, лени. Тут и поплатились, понятно, что это кино, но то что в итоге Германия проиграла уже факт)).
I dont know what ur going on about, we all know germany lost ww2 obviously
Russian Bias movie
@@Mrbf1manthat doesn’t mean incompetence.
I never knew Destiny Mr Borelli was a German Tank commander, but explains a lot now
Just watched this movie last night. I love the clear visuals of this movie so much!
The movie also portrayed the atrocities of german officers at that time really well as well!
Ww2 tank battles are always fun to watch
What's the movie name?
this movie is pure propaganda and soviet indoctrination. It ignored the Russian Atrocities and Mass-Human very well and pretended that the Soviet Regime cared about its Human Resources.
Absoluter Unsinn …..
There is a movie mistake thats not easy to pick up. The T34 turret hatch above the commander is round, like in a 1943 version. But its a 1941 T34. Later on, when ivutschkin exits the tank after the battle is over, you can see that it is round. Kinda curious why they didn't use the 1941 T34 for filming. To me the T34 they use for exterior shots looks real. So why film the inside scenes in a 1943 T34?😂
based on war thunder experience, every pz 2 and halftrack gonna get smeared by the biasmachine. But i sure wish the game had the kill cameras made shell porn like this, at least for paid premium users
The International Criminal Court “Mr PewdiePie, there’s a small thing we’d like to confirm…”
I wonder if that T-34 is the one that's always in the May Day parade.
No, that one was a T34 85, this is the earlier model T34 76.
At 2:35 its Hungarian subtitles, the rest is in english, I don't get it.
Why did the Russian localized version dub over the German lines? Why not just put Russian subtitles? That would make more sense, no?
Where have you seen movies that don't localize main actors because they are supposed to be "foreign"?
This is ridiculous! - I don't know what's your mother tongue is, let's suppose it is English. Do you know many "three musketeers" or "asterix and obelix" movies where all the dialogues are released to american theatres in French w eng.subs?
@@kosiak10851 Films with subtitles are incredibly common. An american tank film would have the german officer speak exclusively in german with subtitles, or have his actor speak english, with no dubbing over.
Even if they did dub him over, they'd remove the actual actor's voice in post.
there's probably other versions of this same movie without the voice over...
Early Soviet campaign the T34/76 was actually better than most of the German tanks. It's only matching battle tank was the Panzer IV with the long 75mm high velocity gun. Unfortunately for the Germans over 2/3 of the Panzer IVs upon the initial invasion of Russia were still outfitted with the short stubby low velocity 75mm meant for HE and infantry support. The Panzer IIIs with the 37mm and 50mm were also outmatched. German high command had actually warned Hitler about the need for up-gunning the Panzer IV to long barreled high velocity 75s: they'd noticed shortcomings during the France campaign. Hitler wasn't willing to wait another year for retrofitting all the IVs though, or for the continuing development of the Panzer V. By Fall German command also noted the need for wider tracks to combat the Russian mud bogging down tanks. Fortunately for the Germans Russian command was so mismanaged and their tanks so poorly deployed it helped negate the advantages of the t34/76, and by the next year the high velocity 75mm was excellent at killing the t34, though I'd still class the t34 and Panzer IV as an equal matchup.
Ingenious! the haystack! The wooden gun was quite a diversion.
Germans never used roof prism binoculars and the 1st version of the T34 had just a magnification lense as target optic.
History fact
The flag on the
Tank was to
Keep German
Air force from bombing
Their own
Tanks 😊
nope, according to official Wehrmacht handbook every german tank needs a swastika for the movie audience recognizing the baddies.
Rudel had hundreds of tank kills in his Stuka. Quite a few of those were German tanks.
The shell ricochet because the angle was slanted making the armor even more tough than straight ahead or at the side like a deer 😢that was a great detail
0:04 tank no gun barrel.
It has a Machine gun like automatic cannon.../ᐠ｡ﻌ｡ᐟ\
@Cakes122 20mm canon yes
I do see the barrel and a machine gun...
Why does russian tank looks big like 2 bedroom apartment from the inside?
Hauptmann Pewdiepie 😂
Adam22 was great in this
That German guy looks like Ragnar from Vikings.
Probs is his character.
Nice.
Like the big red swastika on the turret. We are the German Army!
It's to prevent friend fire from aircraft so Luft doesn't mistake them as T-34s. Happens alot, even today
Plenty of photos supporting thos being done
@@jamalwilburn228 So much for the camo paint and the lack of pilot recognition training.
@@ianross806 It makes sense they'd have it out when they're maneuvering in a column. Your camouflage isn't gonna do you much good if you're making a lot of noise driving down a built up road with a bunch of other allied tanks. They'd certainly have taken it down if the circumstances called for it. Yeah in this scene it's doing the work of telling us who the bad guys are. Not that unrealistic tho.
@@danielivanov439 It reminds me of a National Geographic special on the Battle of Midway.
One of the dive bomber pilots interviewed said it wasn't hard to identify the Japanese carriers.
There was a great big red meatball painted on the forward elevator. Here we are!
Holy shit Pewdiepie!
What pewdiepie was doing in 1942?
1941
2:35 It seems that a Hungarian might have been responsible for translation. He forgot to translate this part of a text.
Amazingly good movie.
The shot on the T-34 was close. If it was hit in the left "cheek" square on, it would have been all over. Source: War Thunder.
Russian "Fury", like nation, like Brad Pitt
what would you rather have? a trigger on the hand-stick? or a foot-pedal trigger - for your tank? Anyone?
And they all lined up.
This is movie or documentary?
One of the best movie in my favourite movies
You´ve seen a one single movie?
This is GOOD! Not some Hollywood bull**, very authentic. Me like.
This is authentic ? Come on.... It's a fun movie but if this is authentic then so is "Fury".
Pewdiepie?
2:45 Random Hungarian subtitle moment. (Ráharaptak means they have bitten on it) meaning they have taken the bait.
Typischer Russenmärchenfilm.
can anyone tell me what music they used in 3:53
Ursula von der Leyen's troops bringing democracy and human rights to the world
Awesome movie. Just magnificent! Could not be found at Apple TV but Amazon Prime got it.
Why dubbing😑?
Russian movie
When you read the books of the New Testament you have probably asked yourself many times: "Why is it that for 2000 years we have not seen the miracles that accompanied the Church of Christ in the first century as the New Testament describes them? Why is it that so-called preachers of Christ have to prove that Jesus really existed, while atheists have the audacity to deny the historicity or divine origin of Christ? Maybe because the Church of Christ ceased to exist after the first century. There is no Church as it is described in the books of the New Testament, but there are Catholic, Orthodox, Protestant and other Christian sects, claiming to be the Church, but not having that one thing that distinguishes the divine from the human and is characteristic only for the Church of Christ - the backing of the word with signs, that is, miracles (Mk 16:15-20). That is why part of the researchers doubt the historicity of Christ, and part of them do not mind to declare Him a real person, but an ordinary philosopher, a teacher. But even if Jesus was an ordinary philosopher, His disciples would have been ordinary followers of Jesus. And they would not have dared to write about the miracles that not only Jesus but also His disciples could perform. If in our time there were a Church as described by the authors of the New Testament books, where miracles are performed - healing the sick, prophesying, raising the dead - no one would doubt the historicity of Christ. Then all over the world there would be the same disputes as in the first century - Jesus is the Son of God or a false prophet who seduces the world with miracles.
Find on youtube the audio message *"The Mystery of the Church of Christ"* . It reveals the prophecy of the disappearance and reappearance of the Church of Christ before the End of the World, giving hope to all who are sincerely seeking God and who are not lazy to think freely.
Beards in war are so cool 😎
Really good movie
Дерьмо то еще
Nice production values.... too bad this movie along with a whole bunch others are just orc propaganda portraying how they single-handedly defeated Germany in WW2.
up to this point, most of the films about WW2 were about how the US won the war by itself with one Sherman tank defeating 10 to 20 tiger tanks...
@@el_Contra So this is better?
@@mdsf01 not necessarily, just putting things into perspective.
Literally 80% of Germans died on the Eastern Front, they didn't single handedly do it but it was very close, and before you toot the land lease horn, it only amounted to 4% of all the Soviet material of the war. They had incredible amount of factories in the Urals, Siberia, Caucasus and such.
You need to learn about the Eastern Front boy, you obviously don't know jack shit about it. Germans broke there after Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk and were on a constant retreat from there on. Nobody denies that Western Allies had one part to do with the victory against Germany but compared to the Eastern Front it was crap