Turkey's "Blue Homeland" Plan to Take Over the Mediterranean - TLDR News
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июн 2022
- Sign up for a CuriosityStream subscription and also get a FREE Nebula subscription (the streaming platform built by creators): CuriosityStream.com/TLDRdaily
Daily Briefing RUclips: / tldrdaily
Daily Briefing Podcast: art19.com/shows/the-daily-bri...
Turkey's Mavi Vatan plan could see the country attempt to take over the Mediterranean. However, this plan would violate Cyprus and Greece's sovereign water and UN Conventions... so it might not be ideal
💬 Twitter: / tldrnewsglobal
📸 Instagram: / tldrnewsglobal
🎞 TikTok: / tldrnews
🗣 Discord: tldrnews.co.uk/discord/
💡 Got a Topic Suggestion? - forms.gle/mahEFmsW1yGTNEYXA
Support TLDR on Patreon: / tldrnews
Donate by PayPal: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
TLDR Store: www.tldrnews.co.uk/store
TLDR TeeSpring Store: teespring.com/stores/tldr-spring
Learn About Our Funding: tldrnews.co.uk/funding
TLDR is all about getting you up to date with the news of today, without bias and without filter. We aim to give you the information you need, quickly and simply so that you can make your own decision.
TLDR is a completely independent & privately owned media company that's not afraid to tackle the issues we think are most important. The channel is run by just a small group of young people, with us hoping to pass on our enthusiasm for politics to other young people. We are primarily fan sourced with most of our funding coming from donations and ad revenue. No shady corporations, no one telling us what to say. We can't wait to grow further and help more people get informed. Help support us by subscribing, following, and backing us on Patreon. Thanks!
CORRECTION: At the beginning of the video, we say 2016 when we mean 2006 (the year Cem Urdeniz and co. coined the term ‘Mavi Vatan’). Apologies, hope you nonetheless enjoyed the video!
You are showing Gokceada as part of Greece in those basic map illustrations, you are absolutely wrong n this matter. The island is legitimately Turkish sovereign land. If you would claim otherwise, you are just a pro-Greek in these matters, not objective one to inform us.
UNCLOS plays a significant role in the South China Sea territorial disputes. In particular, the EZs do not apply to artificial islands that China has been building.
@ and you think Cyprus is Turkish. We are equal
@ Its literally a claim no person ever cared about
You need a lot of correction man.
I think I speak for a lot of Greeks when I say that if Turkey pushes into the Aegean, we will both quite easily fall quickly into war.
turkey would dominate in any war. greece is too hard to conquer fully. but turkish drones and the military taking islands should be easy
@@juniorcrusher2245 France will side with Greece as the rest of Europe, Turkey will quickly be crushed
@@juniorcrusher2245 but doing so under extreme sanctions is extremely difficult
@@juniorcrusher2245 yes, it is easy to take islands from Greece because these islands are so close to Turkey and it is so hard to defend islands that far from motherland.
@@Sabrintwitt3r thats true but it really depends how it all pans out. if its clealry imperialistic like russia then yes, but for example when turkey took northen cyprus the international community supported them
Please to all people who are not following closely this situation for years, please DON’T CHOOSE WORDS POORLY JUST IN FAVOR OF VIEWS OR TO APPEAR AS “UNBIASED”. There is no real DISPUTE over the status of the Aegean islands. Except Imbros and Tenedos all the other Aegean islands were given to Greece with the treaty of Lausanne. Same goes for thee Dodecanese which were given from Italy to Greece with the treaty of Paris. There is no dispute here. For further explanation you could invite an official lawyer to explain according to the UNCLOS and the international law the claims from both sides as well as their concerns. But don’t reduce matters that regard the very existence of a nation to a petty “dispute”.
There was no dispute. Read history. Wars are fought over disputes that cannot be settled by other means except through war. Prepare for Turkish beach landing very soon.
@@ahmetzogu3289 we read history and original documents and all. That’s what you should read too. Not newspapers directly controlled by a failed government. Sad thing you choose war. I thought only extremists wanted it but I see ordinary people think other wise nowadays.
unclos is bullshit turkey doesnt accept it anyways.
@@mehmetsahsert3284 oook………
Greece has urged Ankara to take the dispute to the international Court of Justice in Hague but turkey repeatedly refused. That's all you need to know about how legal turkey's claims sound.
Turkey and Greece has been debating about the sea borders for a very long time, but comparing this situation to Russia and Ukraine is just absurd.
"debating" such an interesting way of putting it. If you are describing Turkey's expansionism in such a way, I can only imagine how you would talk about the Russian invasion of Ukraine. An "extraordinary controversy" perhaps?
We're not debating anything. Turkey is just claiming Greek land that even itself 30 years ago would accept as fully Greek.
I think a reference to Russia-Ukraine was used as a convenient into rather than an actual comparison.
However, 'debating for a very long time' could be said to be a precursor for a war in Ukraine so for me you actually made more of connection than they did.
Is as much as debate as someone has his house closer to the fence and try to steal part of your territory it but excluding any space covered by shed.
There is no debate. Aegean is Greek sea. Turkey has zero legitimate claims and that's why has ZERO international support.
It really does seem that a lot of the chaos in this world comes from greedy old men with too much power and imperialist ambitions.
🇬🇧
More to do with the complications of the planets geography, and finite resources which are also distributed unevenly.
you are just a driver do not overthink and hurt your brain.
we are waiting for them 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
@@tiredgardener the issue is actually nationalism, selfishness and racism. almost all problems in the world can be boiled down to those 3 issues. by stoking the flames of one or all of these learned behaviours, you can incite people to do literally anything, including bringing about incredible harm to themselves.
What I get from this channel is that Turkish public policy is bonkers!
just for a moment try to put aside western biasees, and then tell me how its bonkers that turkey wants equal claims to the agean sea as greece. it is factual that after ww1 european powers ran over the entire region, not having a choice, many of them were forced to settle with what was decided for them and im not talking strictly of turkey. now that turkey has some miltary and political power, they are pushing back and rightfully so.
Seriously, a danger to NATO if anything.
@@youraverage90sguys7 Good points.
I meant this + non-recognition of southern Cyprus + their economic policies.
Haha yeah! Beautiful country, bonkers leader
Which is true ngl
As a Cypriot I’m always happy when my tiny country is mentioned in a RUclips video.
Unless it’s in a TLDR video regarding Turkey’s “ambitions”.
I hope this is the last time, but I highly doubt it.
Exactly, for some reason this channel alone fails to acknowledge Cyprus's independency and Turkey's illegal occupation of the north all together. Ignorance perhaps? Either way, I cringe whenever they mention us in their videos, not objective at all.
They're British, the Colonial dogma poisons their brains
Turks have no ambitions. The Turks are defending themselves against the "Big Idea" in the official ideology of Greece, an expansionist and genocidal, western-backed rogue state. He tried to unite Cyprus with Greece in order to serve his expansionist ambitions and received a very harsh response from the Turkish army.
your cousins to the east understand your struggle. we kurds face this turkish imperialism too
Ancient Turks built the pyramids.
This has been a while. Of key note is also the Greek-Egyptian & Ottoman-Egyptian agreements that came about during the Greek war for independence and Greek-Turkish wars that still have some standings.
Greece never keep their agreements. They are violating Treaty of Lausanne and Paris. They are militarizing the islands on Agean sea which was banned on those treaties.. And even on treaty of Lausanne they agreed 3 miles maritime rights on agean sea once they expanded it to 6 miles and now they are trying to expand it to 12 miles. So Greece is not keeping any promise they gave and trying to get support from France and USA to follow their maximalist policies. Greece is not a island country. They have a mainland. So islands will be ignored while sharing agean sea between Turkish mainland and Greek mainland. France and England had similar problems. There are British islands on French coast which are ignored.
Can you guys make a video on the chances of erdogan getting outsed
Very high. His party is collapsing in the polls.. it was in the 40s before now in the 20s
As someone with Turkish roots i can say close to zero. Erdogan is still widely supported and his conflicts seen as righteous. the economic hardships are blamed on the „corrupt west“
@@MrFrage123 You havent seen the polls then. Minority trust him or blame the "west" for the economy. It is his fault so is the refugee crisis. According to the latest poll 25-30% blame someone else. 70-80% blame tbe government
@@MrFrage123 No. He cant even get %40 percent.
@@gwynnbleid4936 with an inflation over 150% he still has a solid 30% voter base so he won't be outed without an election
Greece has urged Ankara to take the dispute to the international Court of Justice in Hague but turkey repeatedly refused. That's all you need to know about how legal turkey's claims sound.
Not all things that should be legal are.
@@Aloy-sh6gq according to who? To those who support imperialism? Hahaha nice try but it didn't work.
@@y.p.9797 According to every country ever. That's why every year there are things made legal that were previously illegal. Imperialism is projecting your power across the globe, not on your door step. Is it fair that Greece gets to control the Turkish Econmic Zone just because they own a bunch of little, uninhabited, militarized islands far from their homeland? No it isn't
@@Aloy-sh6gq dude the whole world stands with greece, only some muslim countries support you at this topic...you guys are insane...you signed a treaty and now you want to change it? Things doesn't work like this my friend...read carefully the international law
@@Aloy-sh6gq yes it's fair since international law gives us the right to do this
It's like your neighbors to your left and right make an agreement to share your garden. And when you say that's illegal they reply with "we don't follow the law the rest of the world follows"
THERE IS ONLY ONE BLUE HOMELAND .....GREECE, YOUR HOMELAND IS MONGOLIA GO THERE
5:44 So the countries that haven't signed UNCLOS are: International pariahs like Venezuela, Syria, Turkmenistan, and Eretria; countries with no seas like Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and also Turkmenistan, and. shoot it's the US again. Between that, the Rome Statute, Kyoto, and the International Statute on the Rights of the Child this is NOT a good look.
Why didn't you started with US? Coz it doesn't suit your agenda?
No, Israel and USA follow UNCLOS and its rules, even if they have not ratified it. Example of that is Cyprus and Israel's maritime border agreement
US signed the UNCLOS in 1994 but didn’t ratify it.
@@thesoundinyourhead1782 I think you misread. Neither the United States nor Israel have SIGNED the agreement, whether or not they tend to "follow" it or not.
@@thefarstar4367 I never said that they signed it or ratified. All I say is they accept and they apply the rules of UNCLOS. Cyprus signed a maritime border agreement with Israel based on these rules.
Cem is pronounced “Gem” - like as in the stone - not”Kem” the letter ‘c’ makes a ‘j’ sound in Turkish.
nobody gives a shit bro its not his language
Who asked
@@algovoice not me
@@algovoice dude please be polite. that guy just clarifies something about language. I see a lot of english speaking channels struggling with turkish pronunciations.
man we really need to get rid of this old geezer. with the current situation he could do anything and everything to stay relevant in next elections. I don't want my country to be an Islamic variant of Russia
@@algovoice your mom
There is not any Northen Cyprus no one recongises this ... the norther part of Cyprus is occupied and its not called Northen Cyprus but Occupied Cyprus.
How did cyprus occured? Greece battled with Turks win and get? :) Get lost cyprus is ottoman since 1571..and agean İslands stolen from us..greeks didnot win that İslands in war..if you dont win a land in Battlefield it is not your lands.a stolen thing soon ör late taken back bu owner so turkey took back cyprus half..agean sea İslands and half of cyprus taken back when cards are delievered again.. ww3 is right time possible..
Yeah it is called TURKISH REPUBLIC OF NORTHERN CYPRUS and it is a country.
How did you pick your ad? I didnt think you were able to do that
Mavi vatan is imperialism while seville map is not. Okey have a good day :Ddd
The map of Seville was not issued by the Greeks so definitely not an imperialstic map but by the University of Seville following an order from EU and shows EEZ of Greece with maximum EEZ rights for the Islands !!!! If Turkey thinks this map is unfair can go to ICJ and resolve the issue !!! Is that simple !!!!
@@NIKOLASINGLESSIS actually why should anyone go to any court when there is an written agreement signed by both countries already in place. the new map of seville is taking into account agreements not signed by both parties. if we are starting to handle international politics by what 1 side has agreed to and not the other what will happen if Turkey agrees with lets say mongolia that islands do not count against territorial claims but only continental landmass is relevant. it would be absurd because greece would not agree. similarly it is absurd that greece or anyone else expects that Turkey abide byan agreement it did not sign
@@kaanboztepe 169 countries has signed UNCLOS and now it is ethimical law and applies to all signees or not !!! When two countries have different opinions on a matter either they go to a court or to resolve to war !!! Your choice !!
@@NIKOLASINGLESSIS so we can sue the US for warcrimes in the Hague because of what they did to native americans etc. although the US did not sign the agreement but 150+ countries did?
@@kaanboztepeSorry I cant follow you argument !!! Or I am too stupid or it is moronic !!
Turkey about to be cooked early
Sure, whatever you say. They said this before the Invasion of Cyprus, they said this after Turkey shot down the Russian jet, they said this before Turkey entered Syria.... And how'd they play out I wonder? :)
@@bugrayuksel1129 This is different because Greece is an important player in the region that they will not let turkey take over which you can clearly see by the recent supply of weapons.
@@comingafteryou5352 Greece is not an important player, Greece is European, this is the difference. Recent supply of weapons mean nothing to us when we already produce them. So either Greece chooses to play by the rules, or the shit goes down.
@@bugrayuksel1129 It is by position, let alone its own power. You produce inferior weapons that aren't that good in combat as the USA weapons aka the reason you still need to buy foreign missiles and jets.
🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️🏊🏻♂️
The nebula ad of you giving your opinions on various topics was mad cute 😂 I have nebula & already subscribed to the TLDR channels but def could go for some little shorts where you go into those more
"The Turkish army ones stood at the gates of Vienna so thats Turkish to... obviously"
🤮
China logic
The Turkish army rested on thousands of places and took them all. If there was no betrayal in the army. Most of Europe would be ours.
@@yusufklc2962 Ok and? The Roman Empire took all of Anatolia, but that doesn't mean Turkey is Italian. If the Turks are upset about their borders, the shouldn't have joined WW1 after 200 years of losing wars.
@@blackmesa232323 Turkey is satisfied with its land. It is the Europeans who have their eyes on Turkish soil. They call it the oriental problem. The First World War was fought to overthrow the Ottoman Empire and establish Israel. The Second World War was made to frighten the Jews living in Europe to emigrate to Israel. The 3rd world war will begin to take Israel's holy lands (the area from the Nile to the Euphrates) and Israel to destroy the Masjid al-Axa and build the Solomon's temple in its place. You should shut up about things you don't know.
Mavi Vatan docrine is based on 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty signed between Greece and Turkey. This agreement sets the territorial waters to 3 nautical miles, in 1936 (when there was no UNCLOS) Greece unilaterally raised its territorial waters to 6 nautical miles (in violation of the peace treaty). Thus Greece took the first step to create a change to the peaceful stability of the Aegean. Turkey resisted this revisionism till 1960's and then raised its own territorial waters to 6 nautical miles as a means to create equality across the shores. Essentially both of these countries are legally obligated by the 1923 Lausanne Treaty to return their Territorial waters back to 3 nautical miles. This will ensure peace and stability. As for the exclusive economic zone aka the waters that lay beyond territorial waters to which the coastal country has economic rights to, issues are bit more complicated. First of all UNCLOS states that islands can only have the same amount of eez with a mainland, if the said islands constitute an archipelagic state. Archipelagic states do not have any mainlands, so for example like Japan. Greece is currently claiming maximal amounts of exclusive economic zone, for Greece claims that its islands constitute an archipelagic state... yet as we all know Greek islands are not an independent state and are part of the Greek country which has a mainland. Since Greece is a mainland country with islands, unlike Japan, technically Greek islands can only possess territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine underlines this and states that in the Aegean sea, all those Greek islands which lay on eastern side of the mid line, can have an eez only insofar as their territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine shows ICJ cases between UK-France, Spain-Morocco, Canada-France and many others to support its claims. For example Jersey Islands which belong to UK but are closer to the French Riviera only have territorial waters. Yet if UK followed Greek logic, the entire channel sea would belong to UK. Similarly if Spain followed Greek logic Morocco would have almost no sea in the mediterranean. Yet thankfully ICJ denied these claims. THE PROBLEM IS, even legally valid claims of Turkey are being manipulated by the media. Erdogans negative image is utilized to discredit Turkey's legal claims. However Mavi Vatan doctrine is supported by the entire nation regardless of political affiliation. The solution to all these problems are in the 1923 Lausanne Treaty which was established to create a stable and peaceful Aegean. As for the EEZ, international law principles state that mainlands have superiority to islands when there are no island states in question, thus Turkey's claims are legal. Lastly Greece says that Turkey and Greece should go to ICJ to solve the EEZ issue in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece then uses this recommendation to show the world that Turkey is not intending to go to ICJ and is therefore a state which doesnt respect law. Yet Turkey states that it is willing to go to ICJ, but Turkey also states that if both of these countries go to ICJ they need to go for all issues aka both Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Essentially Turkey says that one cannot solve Eastern Mediterranean maritime delimitation without delimiting the Aegean sea. Greece on the other hand assumes that there is nothing wrong with the Aegean thus only Eastern Mediterranean should be taken to the court. Turkey as a response states that there are superior issues within the Aegean which will affect the Eastern Mediterranean issue thus the Aegean must be solved in the courts first. For Turkey the issues in the Aegean include: The Demilitarized status of the Greek Aegean islands next to Turkish riviera; the legal owner of certain islands which were never ceded to Greece with 1923 Lausanne Treaty. So Erdogan recently said, if demilitarized islands are kept militarized in violation of the Lausanne Treaty, their sovereignity will be open to question. Most western media portrayed this as Erdogan being Putin Jr and Greece as Ukraine. Yet the reality is different 1923 Lausanne Treaty names each and every island transferred to Greece and adds that this transfer is dependent on the demilitarized status of the islands. In international law this means that once these islands are militarized the contract/treaty of transfer is violated and therefore Greek ownership of the islands returns to pre 1923. Essentially Turkey does not want these islands, which is why up until today and ever since 1960's Turkey only gave notes and letters to Greece and UN stating that it is observing the violation and urging Greece to abide by the 1923 Treaty... however in 2022 it seems that Turkey ran out of patience. Erdogan stated that Turkeys patience in this issue has been received as compromise by the Greeks, so he stated that Turkey is not Joking when it comes to safe-keeping its rights secured by the 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty. Bear in mind that 1923 Lausanne Treaty was signed in the aftermath of Greek attempt to invade western Turkey. After Greece lost this treaty was signed. AKA Turkey shed blood to have this Treaty. Turkey sees this treaty as the legal ground of its existance, so when Greece (the old invader) attempts to revise the clauses of the treaty Turkey is claiming that its entire existance is threatened for it says international law is ignored by Greece. The irony is since the Western media has an undeniable bias towards Greece, the general masses do not know about the nuances. Let me remind you that ever since 1830's aka establishment of the Greek state, Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks. On the rise of China Russia and Iran, west must realize that Turkey is not a foe but a fucking ally. Yet this bullying attitude to the muslim Turks by the christian western coalition, makes Turkey worried. Turkey doe not see it self part of any camp due to this trust issue, which is why its trying to protect its own rights alone, much like how it did 100 years ago against British, French, Russian, Italian and Greeks. History never forgets, and unfortunately repeats itself. Turks will never shy away from fighting to persevere their rights and dignity. Yet this does not mean Turks are barbaric, that inclination is a mere racist ideology. Turks are humans, who have created many empires with distinct civilizations. Racism or aryanism is not a Turkish ideology, which is why you can find Turkic people from all races and religions. Whether one likes it or not, this is the truth.
This review should have noted Turkey refuses to have the international court settle the issue. Any agreement with Turkey outside of the court, could be brought up again decades later by Turkey.
Turkey hasn't signed the international law for the sea, exactly because the law is against their claims.
@@chgian77Turkey has to go back to court and make the case for changes.
@@chgian77 signed however the treaty of Lausanne, where it is stated that Turkey’s limit is 3km from its shores and has right only 2 specific islands.
So what does it matter what Turkey signed or not? You don’t honour your signature any way
@@annas4843 yeah same with you you are militarazing islands which is against treaty of lausanne
@@jupiterbirlesikgezegenleri9884 you hunted down the Christians in Constantinopoli and imvros and tenedos when the muslims of thraki remained untouched and you shouldn't who didn't honor the deal ? Also the islands militarised because and after the invasion in Cyprus . And thirdly we have every right in the world when we have an wannabe ottoman empire who is going with jets armed above and i repeat LITERALLY ABOVE HOUSES OF CIVILIANS OF THE GREEK ISLANDS to arm the islands to teeth.
The way you say "Mavi Vatan" 💀
Because Turkey is not a part of UNCLOS the agreement on aegean sea can not be overruled. The principle of international law is the fact that only the signing countries are responsible for the agreed rules and restrictions. At the conflict we saw earlier between italy and greece or much more around the world, islands themselves would not enable an access around 12 miles into the sea.
But this not chang the EEZ delimitation.
As Turkiye has applied the 12 miles zone in the black sea and therefore used UNCLOS legislation to their favour, they have recognised UNCLOS in front of the international community even without signing the treaty.
Had Turkiye continued applying the 6 miles everywhere, they could use this argument, but from the moment they extended their waters in the Black Sea they automatically recognised UNCLOS as valid.
@@sargon1241 that's not my logic, that's the logic of international law. There's something called "common law". You might want to look it up. This is not something I personally have come up with,this is standard of international law. If Turkiye had extended to 11 miles they still would have agreed to UNCLOS, as before UNCLOS 6 miles was accepted as common law and everything further would have been a violation. So to not recognise UNCLOS as common law Turkiye would have had to stick to the 6 miles everywhere.
"Conflict between itlay and Greece." There is not such thing. Greece's Ionians islands (west of mainland) have 12nm teritorial waters like 160+ countries already have.
@@sargon1241 before UNCLOS no country had signed any treaty that referred to territorial waters bigger than the 6 miles. The 6 miles were accepted by the UN as common law until UNCLOS.
So which treaty are you referring to that claimed any country had the right to extend their territorial waters over the 6 miles?
Edit: forgot, sorry:
If Turkiye as a sovereign country could just extend their territorial waters as they please,the same would be true for Greece, so Greece could just claim whatsoever territorial waters in the Aegean, but Turkiye claims that exactly this is not the case.
UNCLOS always makes me think of Unaha-Closp.
Turkey need to chill out and respect their neighbours.
this gives me argentina flashbacks over the malvinas... this will not end well for anyone involved
The Falklands.
The UK humiliated and destroyed Argentina id say it ended well for them
Which country is this channel from? I love unbiased news like this
you mean in favor of Greece lol
@@envadd.6556 well in this situation unbiased news is in favor towards Greece because international law is in favor of Greece. Turkey is in the wrong.
Just because Turkey has found itself with some unfortunate geography doesn't mean it can ignore international law and trample the rights of its neighbouring countries or in the case of Cyprus not even recognise them as a country. The Dardanelles block the access to the Mediterranean of several Black Sea countries. Conveniently Turkey doesn't have a problem with that unfortunate geography.
Yes you can! International law is foor poor loser that have to accept it as they have no power
yeah, a lot of overlapping in Greek waters. Not sure the Greeks would approve
We don´t.
@@GreekArmyVeteran95 not ur waters
@@GreekArmyVeteran95 9 milion population trash country surviving with the hot money from germany. claims whole turkey coasts because of few small islands. not gonna happen
@@burakbr7789 They're not your islands, either.
@@GreekArmyVeteran95 Cant wait to show you who really own those islands. Keep sleeping in fear of erdogan invasion every night 😂 you deserve it though
Why is every country's expansionist ideas discussed but not greater Israel? Isn't this a news/non-biased info channel?
so we're not allowed to talk about any nation in a bad way because Israel still exists? Bro...
@@c.k.636 NO what im saying is that talk about them as well. Why only not talk about them?
Dude, Turkey doesn't have enough money to stay put, let alone go anywhere.
they already spent huge amount of dollar reserves to artificially boost the turkish lira and increase the demand, which didnt quite work out though, considering the turkish lira curved all the way up to where it was previously at prior to the central banks decision to spend dollar reserves.
The Turkish Army is 70% domestic production and is a self-sufficient country in terms of war technology, which gives it the strength to fight for many years.If the situation is Economy, the country that owes 466,130,000,000 USD is Greece and the war will not work for you at most, non-native planes have a limited lifespan.10 transit trips for Rafale will total 112 million USD. Part/system purchase is $45,000 to qualify for purchasing service.In short, the first country that can't handle a long war is Greece.
Man. If it is really 1vs 1..turkey would destroy greeks and their children would cry greek Genocide for centuries in future..
@@enesaydn6054 turkey economy is collapsing and is surrounded by enemies. If turkey goes to war with greece, iran and russia will invade eastern turkey, and kurds will revolt domestically. Two front war plus civil war. and then turkey is done. Turkey is a very weak country compared to iran and russia, and terrible economy.
@@mnezon1314 🤣🤣🤣 russia will support us if we fight with Greece wtf you talking about and i am sure that too Iran hate Greece they can support what you talking about hahahaha i will dead you are living interesting earth
1. Notice the thousands of Greek islands in the Aegean… hundreds of which are inhabited by Greeks and has been since Aristotle and earlier.
2. Understand a lot of Greeks call these islands “home” - some Greeks have never even stepped foot on the mainland.
3. Realize these islands are not “in between Greece and Turkey” they simply are Greece. AND they are certainly not some kind of prize dangling before Erdogan’s small greedy eyes.
…
Some find it absurd to compare Erdogan to Putin, “Turkey is in NATO…”, well that has not stopped Erdogan violating Greek airspace with fighter Jets and drones, violating Greek waters with gunboats harassing local fishermen and blocking much needed Greek hydrocarbon exploration and extraction, it has not stopped Turkey from drilling for oil and gas inside Greek water (summer 2020), using refugees as a political tool to gain leverage over Greece and the EU, making a EEZ agreement with Libya that literally cuts through the Mediterranean’s fifth biggest island Crete (Crete is 25 times the size of EU member Malta), it has not stopped Turkey from recently (two weeks ago) laying official claim to 152 Greek islands (with support from the Turkish opposition party CHP) and this summer Turkey is expected to try to install an oil rig in Greek waters…
I don’t know what this sounds like to you but I see clear similarities to the dynamic between Ukraine-Russia before 2014 and the Russian annexation of Crimea.
It would be a grave and costly mistake for the EU not to take Erdogan’s expansionist actions seriously.
unfortunately I agree
gotta mention that greece was and still violating turkish airspace
greece had to keep aegen islands that is close to turkey unmilitarized according to treaty of lausanne(peace treaty that signed after greco-turkish war of 1919-1921) but they wont
greece invading small islands and and stones that is not mentioned in treaty of lausanne and millitarizing that islands against us even way and way before "mavi vatan" like since 90s
and finally greece's claims on Mediterranean is absurd totally blocking turkey and turkeys aegen claims was a reaction to greece's claims you cant ignore a country like turkey
Don't forget that Turkey treats the Kurds pretty much the exact same way that Russia treats Ukrainians.
archaeological excavations show that you are an invader in Anatolia. Hittites, Luwis, Lydians, Phrygians, Lycians, troys lived before you.
@@calebbearup4282 Turkey's Kurds are in a much greater situation right now We even used to have Kurdish president during 90's(Turgut Özal) and the 90's were PKK(Kurdish Workers Party[Terorrists])'s most active years
``admiral cem gurdeniz`` sounds suspiciously like ``admiral karl donitz``
oh I now understand why Turkey dont like new nato bases in Greece
By Greece you mean Disputed Islands right? Which is against no militarization treaty between 2 countries.
@@eldahalas7015 is nothing disputed on those islands. They are part of the international recognised borders
@@eldahalas7015 our islands are as disputed as Kiev is from Ukraine. Not going anywhere
@@eldahalas7015 Please provide us with just one country in this world (not the neo-ottoman fantasy one) that supports the ridiculous Turkish claims.
@@IOANNOU28 north cyprus hehe gotem😎
While NATO needs Turkey as a member, it allows Turkey to be a bit more thuggish as the knows full well that NATO can't afford to lose Turkey.
That being said, removing Turkey from NATO might give them more justification to be even more thuggish.
So either way it is going to be a bit of an issue for NATO.
Turkey is definitly the most problematic member of NATO, in terms of ideology it everything NATO stands against. However NATO needs Turkey, they are going to be a hostile nation if not being a NATO member, NATO will loss control of a crucial trafic junction, and wherever NATO don't intervene, Russia and China will, just like Syria. By accepting Turkey as a NATO they removed a major adversary without firing a shot.
What happens if a NATO member attacks another NATO member?
The only rogue state here is Greece, which has the western support behind it.
@@DrRusty5 it would depend on who attacks who and the scale and how the attacks were made. I doubt a small border squirmish would make other Nato countries intervene. But if you are talking about Greece and Turkey you have to remember Greece is a member of the EU and generally has better relations with other NATO countries than Turkey. Most of those countries would most likely support Greece though it is hard to say exactly what this support would entail.
@@DrRusty5 Nothing. Turkey and Greece almost went to war in 1974 and is still in kind of a cold war and NATO did nothing. Article 5 only applies when an outside force attack a NATO member.
IT bachelor degree graduate explaining an international issue and getting everything wrong i am not surprised at all. your perspective might be enough to impress chicks at pubs but definitely joke material among academicians.
Honestly, I understand why Turkey is unhappy with todays situation. It has a huge coastline, but a minor exclusive economic zone. The fact that Greece has islands almost at a swimming distance from Turkey makes the situation as it is. The territory around these islands should infringe less on turkeys maritime territory. The only agreement was more fair in my opinion.
They’re literally islands. Why would Turkey get an economic exclusive zone that surrounds the islands that were older than the country?
@@simofurmum1065 Uh? Turkey's current borders were established in the 1923 treaty of Lausanne, which superceded the treaty of Sevres lol
On the other hand Turkey has a huuuuuuge mainland area tha is full of natural resources and coud be used as a farmland and as a habbitable area. Greece on the other hand has a very limited mainland that is mostly mountainous and makes it more difficult to farm and to build cities and settlements and related infrastructure. Building new national roads for example is a gargantuan task because of our geography (amongst other things such as corruption and incompetence and such, but the conversation is just about geography). So my point is that geography of a country may suck but those are the cards that you're dealt with so complaining about your "dice roll" essentially being unfair and trying to conquer neighboring areas just because you don't like your geography is literally imperialism.
Yhea. The current arrangement does seem heavily biased to island nations. This probably is in no small part due to the British Empire's signature on the history of maritime law.
I think it would be fairer if some measure of the size of the land served by a coastline was taken into account.
Having islands next to Turkey us just like borders in Evros.m with the same sceptic, why Asia Minor's coasts are Turkish since you can swim there from the Greek islands? You guys are hilarious and hypocrites
5:42
I don't get what's the point of landlocked states signing the UNCLOS agreement?
yes but but but but... Turkey has enforced unclos in the Black sea
@@TMPOUZI I don't know what Turkey is doing in the Black sea, but I:
- doubt they would enforce something that they never signed
- am pretty sure the black sea isn't a landlocked body of water (due to the Bosphorus)
- doubt they have the authority to do that anyways
I welcome you (or anyone else) to discredit any of my points with (preferably) logical statement(s).
It's not you, it's me, seen way to much trash talk that doesn't make much sense.
@@lionlog2053 instead of writing nonsense you can check and verify it
You made the claim on black sea UNCLOS enforcement, it is up to you to prove it
@lionlog205 only pointed out his doubts on the matter, which adds little but is very welcomed to do as part of the conversation.
@@TMPOUZI But you made the claim that Turkey was enforcing UNCLOS, why am I the one who has to prove anything?
And also, I never said my points were absolutely correct, but I have my doubts on the validity of your comment.
Lastly, I don't see how my comments are 'nonsense', I personally believe that they are entirely logical.
Turkey economy is sinking with their lira... They can't keep their people fed, how they will keep their army going?
I think this is a classic example of starting (a war) or conflict so people are distracted to actual problems
@@VisboerAnton the same like Russia, China etc... Every time there are internal issues they start wars
With massive amounts of nationalism
@@MrFrage123
Yes, exactly
"Authoritarian handbook for dummies" page 1
First Greeks territorial waters have remain in 6 nautical miles and not 12 as unclos gives the right as to not create unnecessary tension .
Second Turkey often cross in Greek territorial water with warships for decades.
But the aggression has reach the point of repetitively talking about invasion of the Aegean island in Turkish media by political and military leaders without even hiding anymore with maps and plans and what actions to take.
And from how things going it's almost certain that it will happen soon.
They would probably start third world war by doing so, as it would turn NATO against them, making its members less capable to respond to any additional threats until it is resolved. Then China could decide it is their best chance at taking Taiwan. USA could intervene and India might help too as they might see this as a good chance to deal with their rival. Pakistan might get involved as well, considering that they got somewhat friendly with China while hating India. However, I don't see here how Turkey comes out on top from this. They would probably go from "economy is in bad shape" to stone age.
@@staryimoze That's why they play with both sides. If relations with NATO goes sour they will jump over to the Russo-Chinese ship. NATO however is preparing for quite sometime for such a result, improving Greece as strategical ally while demoting Turkey.
@@perseusarkouda I suppose they could strike once NATO is busy with China and then hope to gain something, but they would be basically completely closing themselves to any western country for like forever and condemning themsleves to do business with Russia and China; I'm having a really hard time remembering when was the last time someone benefitted from partnering with those 2 like that. I doubt that Turkey could hope to gain much other than a couple of islands and extending their access to sea and it doesn't seem worth ruining your country any hope for progress. Maybe it is just their current dictator idea for strengthening his grip on power and he just doesn't care if he will rule over a rubble of a country, something that is fairly possible I guess if you look at similar cases.
You are a shameless liar
@@staryimoze Dictator Erdogan wants to leave a legacy behind him. Turkey wants to be an empire again. This is their dream. So, he wants to expand in every direction possible. They know that cannot afford a war with Greece, which is the 2nd strongest army in EU, after France, which is becoming more advanced than Turkey’s army with resent arms deals made. So, he will try to gain anything, without fighting. If he fight, he will lose, so Erdogan’s name in history will be a disgrace for Turkey. Tough situation, considering also the economical issues, but he can only blame himself! His decisions for greatness may doom Turkey and there is no easy way out now!
Fantastic video🏆Thank you for doing this!
Its a biased one
@@carpediem5514 how so?
Mavi Vatan docrine is based on 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty signed between Greece and Turkey. This agreement sets the territorial waters to 3 nautical miles, in 1936 (when there was no UNCLOS) Greece unilaterally raised its territorial waters to 6 nautical miles (in violation of the peace treaty). Thus Greece took the first step to create a change to the peaceful stability of the Aegean. Turkey resisted this revisionism till 1960's and then raised its own territorial waters to 6 nautical miles as a means to create equality across the shores. Essentially both of these countries are legally obligated by the 1923 Lausanne Treaty to return their Territorial waters back to 3 nautical miles. This will ensure peace and stability. As for the exclusive economic zone aka the waters that lay beyond territorial waters to which the coastal country has economic rights to, issues are bit more complicated. First of all UNCLOS states that islands can only have the same amount of eez with a mainland, if the said islands constitute an archipelagic state. Archipelagic states do not have any mainlands, so for example like Japan. Greece is currently claiming maximal amounts of exclusive economic zone, for Greece claims that its islands constitute an archipelagic state... yet as we all know Greek islands are not an independent state and are part of the Greek country which has a mainland. Since Greece is a mainland country with islands, unlike Japan, technically Greek islands can only possess territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine underlines this and states that in the Aegean sea, all those Greek islands which lay on eastern side of the mid line, can have an eez only insofar as their territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine shows ICJ cases between UK-France, Spain-Morocco, Canada-France and many others to support its claims. For example Jersey Islands which belong to UK but are closer to the French Riviera only have territorial waters. Yet if UK followed Greek logic, the entire channel sea would belong to UK. Similarly if Spain followed Greek logic Morocco would have almost no sea in the mediterranean. Yet thankfully ICJ denied these claims. THE PROBLEM IS, even legally valid claims of Turkey are being manipulated by the media. Erdogans negative image is utilized to discredit Turkey's legal claims. However Mavi Vatan doctrine is supported by the entire nation regardless of political affiliation. The solution to all these problems are in the 1923 Lausanne Treaty which was established to create a stable and peaceful Aegean. As for the EEZ, international law principles state that mainlands have superiority to islands when there are no island states in question, thus Turkey's claims are legal. Lastly Greece says that Turkey and Greece should go to ICJ to solve the EEZ issue in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece then uses this recommendation to show the world that Turkey is not intending to go to ICJ and is therefore a state which doesnt respect law. Yet Turkey states that it is willing to go to ICJ, but Turkey also states that if both of these countries go to ICJ they need to go for all issues aka both Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Essentially Turkey says that one cannot solve Eastern Mediterranean maritime delimitation without delimiting the Aegean sea. Greece on the other hand assumes that there is nothing wrong with the Aegean thus only Eastern Mediterranean should be taken to the court. Turkey as a response states that there are superior issues within the Aegean which will affect the Eastern Mediterranean issue thus the Aegean must be solved in the courts first. For Turkey the issues in the Aegean include: The Demilitarized status of the Greek Aegean islands next to Turkish riviera; the legal owner of certain islands which were never ceded to Greece with 1923 Lausanne Treaty. So Erdogan recently said, if demilitarized islands are kept militarized in violation of the Lausanne Treaty, their sovereignity will be open to question. Most western media portrayed this as Erdogan being Putin Jr and Greece as Ukraine. Yet the reality is different 1923 Lausanne Treaty names each and every island transferred to Greece and adds that this transfer is dependent on the demilitarized status of the islands. In international law this means that once these islands are militarized the contract/treaty of transfer is violated and therefore Greek ownership of the islands returns to pre 1923. Essentially Turkey does not want these islands, which is why up until today and ever since 1960's Turkey only gave notes and letters to Greece and UN stating that it is observing the violation and urging Greece to abide by the 1923 Treaty... however in 2022 it seems that Turkey ran out of patience. Erdogan stated that Turkeys patience in this issue has been received as compromise by the Greeks, so he stated that Turkey is not Joking when it comes to safe-keeping its rights secured by the 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty. Bear in mind that 1923 Lausanne Treaty was signed in the aftermath of Greek attempt to invade western Turkey. After Greece lost this treaty was signed. AKA Turkey shed blood to have this Treaty. Turkey sees this treaty as the legal ground of its existance, so when Greece (the old invader) attempts to revise the clauses of the treaty Turkey is claiming that its entire existance is threatened for it says international law is ignored by Greece. The irony is since the Western media has an undeniable bias towards Greece, the general masses do not know about the nuances. Let me remind you that ever since 1830's aka establishment of the Greek state, Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks. On the rise of China Russia and Iran, west must realize that Turkey is not a foe but a fucking ally. Yet this bullying attitude to the muslim Turks by the christian western coalition, makes Turkey worried. Turkey doe not see it self part of any camp due to this trust issue, which is why its trying to protect its own rights alone, much like how it did 100 years ago against British, French, Russian, Italian and Greeks. History never forgets, and unfortunately repeats itself. Turks will never shy away from fighting to persevere their rights and dignity. Yet this does not mean Turks are barbaric, that inclination is a mere racist ideology. Turks are humans, who have created many empires with distinct civilizations. Racism or aryanism is not a Turkish ideology, which is why you can find Turkic people from all races and religions. Whether one likes it or not, this is the truth.
You words might become undone with a singular Turkish drone strike to a Greek school
@@brndj6672 Jesus good luck in life with all this optimism bro...
for someone who isn't shy about writing, you seem to forget some critical facts in this one-sided story....
For example, the Montreau Convention, which in 1936 was signed by Turkey and concedes that the two islands Lemnos and Samothraki have every right to military infrastructure.
Or In 1973 and '74, when Turkey unilaterally gives permission to its national energy company to perform searches for resources in the heart of the Aegean.
Or Attila II, the second invasion in Cyprus in August 1974, when the turkish troops were secretly ordered to invade after the military juntas in Greece and Cyprus had fallen and the negotiations were still in place. To elaborate just for the sake of clarity, Turkey's absurd demands on the table were a plot for a complete invasion, while the new greek government was forbidden to send defence assistance off the greek shores. And that brings me to the third...
Established borders are uncondional. If there is a militarization dispute, there are procedures and judges, not invasion threats masked as "sovereignty questioning". That is basic international law. Turkey knows that of course and has an absurd level of military infrastructure at her shores, but any reason will do for the conquests of Tayyip.
Few more important corrections there: UNCLOS refers to archipelagic waters in reference NOT to the EEZ, but territorial sea (3/6/12 n.miles). EEZ is in principle defined by median regardless of main country bodies/masses. Of course, this has to be a result of an agreement, so differences can bilaterally be negotiated or decided by a judge. But the reality is that Turkey denies taking this to the ICJ because she has to commit beforehand that whatever is ruled will be respected regardless the feelings.
Furthermore, it will be made crystal clear that the Lausanne and Montreaux agreements as well as the Peace Treaty with Italy give Greece ALL of the Aegean islands EXCEPT to the ones next to the Straits, whose greek population should have been protected (was taxed to oblivion in violation of Lausanne) and the islets which lie at a distance of 3 nautical miles of the anatolian shore. It would be absurd to name 2000+ island in a treaty, only the big ones are named, the rest are described as "adjacent". Turkey would gladly seize even one of them, as shown during the Imia/Kardak crisis of 1996 in order to claim commitment even though there is no turkish population or written evidence of her authority over them.
Disclaimer: i have absolutely nothing against my turkish brothers. I feel Turks and Greeks share a common Ottoman history and we are only divided by religion and language, but culture is a lot more than that. My only problem is that a dictator is prolonging strife in our region that should have been gone ages ago. My hopes are that our poor countries keep the peace and prosper again for all people regardless nationality, race and political views.
''Greece (the old invader)'' - You can't be serious!
Oh but then I read the rest of the nonsense. ''Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks.'' Has it ever crossed your mind that the Ottomans were THE BLOODY OCCUPIERS & COLONIZERS in the first place???
Constantinople is on the western side of the Dardanelles does that mean it belongs to Greece? Let's see Turkey demilitarize occupied Cyprus show us the way Erdogen
He wont. He is deadset on it. He made it his lifes ambition, he wont back down. Much like China. I dying power that looks strong. But if you know anything about Anatolia, it has the strange ability to make a weak dying power like formidable. And time and time again, it has been proven right.
Back then they didnt have NATO. If Turkey tries anything foolish Athens will just do an article 5.
Truth be told if I was Erdogan(I hate the guy bottom of my heart) I definitely wouldnt demilitarise Cyprus too when there is aggression from the opposite side but before all this aggression they were talking about the unification of Cyprus and independence but of course, political talks stop when both parties show their teeth.
Actually, the so-called "Greco-Turkish disputes" is not an Greco-Turkish bilateral problem but an issue of International Law and ONLY the UN Court can give a solution. The problem is that Turkey wants to avoid that and try to force Greece via military pressure to bilateral negotiations outside the UN framework and Laws. When Greece reacts Turkey becomes more aggressive and accuse Greece that is avoiding dialog.
I am afraid that sooner or later Erdogan will play his last card and there will be a carnage having in mind the enormous fire power of both countries
Turkey supported the application to the court, but Greece claims that Turkey rejected it. While Turkey says that we should go to the court for the sharing of the Aegean Sea, Greece rejects the offer to apply to the court for the Eastern Mediterranean because it does not see any problem here. If there is a court for the division of the Aegean, Turkey will join.
@@canervariyenli8702 after the video you saw you believe that Greece rejects the UN Court?
The UN Court give solutions according to the UN Laws and it is Turkey that don't like the UN Laws, not Greece.
You know, Greece has the same problem with Albania since Albania reacts over the influence of some small Greek islands to Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) in the Ionian Sea. Both countries signed a deal and agreed to apply their dispute to UN Court. Peaceful, civilized and without drama. Simple as that
@@mariosathens1 Ну что, греки, как дела? Русские не придут вам на помощь, будьте уверены. За вашу подлость вам летит бумеранг.
@@mariosathens1 there will be no war. As a Turk, I can guarantee that there will be no war. Because the economy and the people do not allow it, the people do not want war.
I can write the text replacing Turk and Greek in your text. like " When Turkey react Greece becomes more agressive and accuse Turkiye". The difference is you write in Greek premise.
ahhhh authoritarians never change.....
why should them, why should they give up when they can take everything for them and have more than less, i dont understand nowadays world, yall are all dumb, being autoritarian means being normal. if i can get more, i do get more, I'm never giving up for the good of everybody, i think to myself and nobody else and this is totally normal
@@domenicosumma8045 The word you are looking for is "psychopathic", not "normal".
@@Theorimlig psycopath because thinks to their own good? omg, but then yall support kill of babies for the own good of mothers thats ok? bro i support authoritarian govs at all, its literally normality, psycopath is libertarialism that only benefits the blacks and women, authoritarianism is the normal way of behaving, why should i not try to take more, lmao dumb bro
@@PugkinSoup bro i dont care of some freedom of press if in change of that i can have my nation to be strong and rich and narionalist and i could get to be racist towards others and benefit from not accepting immigrant and not people with my race and be considered superior to others because i would benefit more from the second and honestly what freedom of speech, today we dont have a pure one, i cant say in public anyrhing about racism, fascism, national socialism and cant say i oppose this all, a true freedom of speech should let me talk about it and exprees my point of view in total freedom and not being insulted and hated by the society, if you do this you'd get the very opposite of this, so no, we dont live in a freedom of speech society
@@domenicosumma8045 yeah im gonna agree with Theorimlig here, youve got some pent up issues you are bleeding onto a youtube comment section
Tha mas KLASEI TA PAPARIA.
HUGE SUPPORT TO TURKEY FROM AUSTRALIA GO ON TURKEY.
Nicaragua and Colombia had a similar maritime dispute, and the International Court of Justice found a compromise, awarding an EEZ to a collection of Colombian islands off the Nicaraguan coast while denying it to others. Anyone interested can google the resulting map. Referring the case to the international court of justice would make the most sense for Turkey and Greece but unfortunately, Turkey refuses to do so. I wonder if Greece should submit its claims unilaterally like the Philippines did to delegitimize China's 9-dash line in the South China Sea (and ended up winning).
Problem is Turkey isn't a signatory while China (PRC) was so I'm not sure how they'll deal with that.
Unfortunately China doesn’t care about what the International courts think as it’s still Militarizing in the 9 dash line ):
You're lying. Turkey does not reject this, the Greek side rejects it. Because the Greeks broke the treaty and the law. He armed the islands, which he said he wouldn't arm. I wonder why you feel the need to lie.
@@baskansparrow8260 That is not a treaty on maritime international law, you are talking about the treaty that awarded the dodecanese islands to Greece, which stipulates that they should be disarmed. Greece maintains that Turkey has no say in the matter, as Turkey is not a signatory to that treaty, it is between Italy and Greece. Greece has indeed armed the islands as they are being threatened. Greece and Italy can revise the treaty, removing the demilitarized condition.
@@baskansparrow8260 Did you even understand what the man is saying?
1st Turkey has no say in the treaty between Greece and Italy. Turkey hasn't sign it.
2nd Greece , and this is a well known fact, is willing to take Turkey to the ICJ but Turkey is refusing with passion for the past years.
Stop being bling for your sake pal.
To be really honest, it's true that the distribution of maritime zone between Turkiye and Greece is a bit unfair to Turkiye. It's true that it does look absurd that small islands take the priority over a large coastline.
But on the other, if Turkiye had a more "fair" maritime zone, it would effectively cut the maritime connection between a lot of the Greek Aegean Islands. And since Turkiye is not in EU, it would also isolate them border wise. Greeks traveling between those islands would now need to cross Turkish border. And not only it would be very inconvenient for all the Greeks living there, but it would also be very impractical for Turkish authorities to control this nightmarish border. So it's not the solution either.
All in all, the issue of the maritime zone in the Aegean Sea is a very complicated one, that needs some better solution, but certainly not aggressive moves from Turkiye.
The best in short term would be to establish some kind of shared maritime zones between the two countries.
But in the long term, all this would be SO much simpler if Turkiye ever manages to join EU and the Schengen space, in the future. Though, that would first require for Turkish government to stop considering their neighbors as ennemies and as land to claim.
Edit : after reading some of the sub-comments, I have to honestly ask you if you guys know how to read?
Some are accusing me of supporting Turkiye and Erdoğan's agenda, yet I'm explicitly denouncing Turkish government's agressive approach, and I'm explicitly explaining Greece's concern. I'm literally supporting a better status quo and a shared zone. So please, make sure you haven't only read the first paragraph before you go on answering in bitterness.
youve hit the nail on its head, but i would add that greek passport holding citizens having the ability to travel within eurozone will not be interrupted by turkish maritime borders is a pretty easy thing to implement
Turkey sold the islands to Greece and got in return Greek territories in Anatolia...now coming back for what they sold
Turkey invaded the north of Cyprus now want all the EEZ of the island.
They sound like Russia
I don't understand the not-fair argument. Is fairness based on the feelings of the parties or a system of laws? How do we delineate borders in the 21st century, using laws and courts or by sizing up military power? I am tired of people subtly encouraging expansion tendencies of Turkiye because it doesn't feel it got enough power/ land/ riches or whatever post WW2 and the disruption of the old empires. They got what was left after they conducted all their conquering and their warring as did all the other countries after the world wars. You don't get to expand borders, you don't get to change laws on your favor. You don't negotiate with pistols. The greek islands of the Aegean FAIRLY belong to Greece and they deserve their full fair and legal maritime zone. ALL of them.
Best comment of the video. It really is almost unsovable
I don't think it'd really affect the border crossings tho, EEZ is different from maritime borders. Maritime border, IIRC, only extends about 10 miles from coast where the country has full sovereignty. EEZ, which gives countries access to anything found in the waters, extends about 200 miles from coast, but doesn't restrict non commercial movement.
"UNCLOS does somewhat unfairly benefit multi-island states". Let's break that down, shall we? States that control islands first of all by definition have a special relationship with the sea, in which these islands are found. Sea fairing peoples populated islands; it wouldn't therefore seem so unfair that they control the resources around those islands. Those resources makes living on those rocks economically viable and the sea around them isn't unlike the mineral resources on the mainland. Just as Greece can't lay claim to the sweet water of rivers that run through Turkey or the Nile that empties opposite its shores, so too Turkey, or Libya can't claim the waters that wet our shores. Our shores sit opposite mainland Turkey across a thin strip of water, not by some weird coincidence, or a freak historical anecdote, like how British waters constrain the waters of Argentine. Greek islands, i.e. the islands of Greece and also the islands populated by the Greeks are a short boat trip from the shores of Türkiye because there Greeks also lived in huge numbers until a century ago they were violently evicted after 3.000 years from their ancient homeland, which they have dotted with countless splendid and timeless monuments. For all Turkish protestations, Turkey has limited access to the Aegean not by chance, but because there at the shores is as far as it could cleanse the land of Greeks. Greece and, before Greek independence, ethnic Greeks have been a formidable maritime power for two and a half centuries. The Aegean is not the water mass between Greek lands, it is the blue fields we tamed and have harnessed for 3.000 years. Had we had no access to those fields, not only would there be no Greek history, but the history of the Black sea, North Africa and the middle east, Sicily and Italy would have been unrecognizable. Few things, few claims in the world would be more unfair than to lay claim on waters, which according to international law fall under Greek sovereignty and Greek sovereign rights.
Historical claims to the islands will not make your point any stronger but will indicate your ignorance to the subject; this comment is a bellwether for further turk and greek comments proving but themselves the islands and the sea covering their sphere are in their inherent right to possess. You Turks and Greeks will not be able to achieve anything nor hammer out any agreement so long as you don't lay aside your historical achievements which in fact doesn't even belong to ''you'' anyways.
To put it simply why the analogy is with british Island (Turkish absurd invention) is not the same:
Greek islands' territorial waters start near mainland and end near Turkish coasts. Even with 6nm the distance is so small that makes Agean sea a Greek homogeneous "lake". With 12nm, 70% and more is greek sovereignty, because teritorial waters = sovereignty. Because of this unfortunate for turks reality, we are entitled for such big EEZ. Even without kastelorizo, because of Crete (5th biggest island of Mediterranean sea), Karpathos and Rhodes, Greece is still entitled of EEZ in East med.
@@thesoundinyourhead1782 it's actually 81%. But Turkey thratens with Casus Belli if that happens. Turkey acts like the world still runs on 16th century empires
I am Turkish and neither Turkey nor Greece have faults in this problem. this problem can be solved at the table, but there are countries that do not want this problem to be fixed, these countries are the USA, England and France. When was underground wealth found in the Mediterranean? after that, they want to attack here like a hungry dog. in it, to fight two countries of the same culture, to sell their weapons, to buy underground riches and finally to issue war debts. but these countries think we are stupid but we are not the property taken is not given back. If it is to be taken, you will not leave even 1 person. I don't know Greek. Don't expect other countries to use your own lands for years, but never expect this from Turkey.
I wish this was true but Erdogan is the one that keeps wanting to revise more stuff( muslim minority, demilitirisation and others). For us it's only the EEZ.
The thumbnail gives me whatifalthist vibes
well i mean he could try.. but...
And here is the third part:
I would also like to add, that you're referencing the treaty of Lausanne and UNCLOS a lot. Turkey does not recognize UNCLOS, so how come you try to use it to defend it? Also, the gazillion times that Turkey has violated the treaty of Lausanne (the very treaty that you claim is so important for Turkey and that Turkey sees it as a very important text) seem to have passed you by completely.
Let me give you some examples:
Treaty of Lausanne:
ARTICLE 38.
''The Turkish Government undertakes to assure full and complete protection of life and liberty to ali inhabitants of Turkey without distinction of birth, nationality, language, race or religion.
All inhabitants of Turkey shall be entitled to free exercise, whether in public or private, of any creed, religion or belief, the observance of which shall not be incompatible with public order and good morals.
Non-Moslem minorities will enjoy full freedom of movement and of emigration, subject to the measures applied, on the whole or on part of the territory, to all Turkish nationals, and which may be taken by the Turkish Government for national defence, or for the maintenance of public order.
ARTICLE 39.
Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities will enjoy the same civil and political rights as Moslems.
All the inhabitants of Turkey, without distinction of religion, shall be equal before the law.
Differences of religion, creed or confession shall not prejudice any Turkish national in matters relating to the enjoyment of civil or political rights, as, for instance, admission to public employments, functions and honours, or the exercise of professions and industries.
No restrictions shall be imposed on the free use by any Turkish national of any language in private intercourse, in commerce, religion, in the press, or in publications of any kind or at public meetings.
Notwithstanding the existence of the official language, adequate facilities shall be given to Turkish nationals of non-Turkish speech for the oral use of their own language before the Courts.
ARTICLE 40.
Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities shall enjoy the same treatment and security in law and in fact as other Turkish nationals. In particular, they shall have an equal right to establish, manage and control at their own expense, any charitable, religious and social institutions, any schools and other establishments for instruction and education, with the right to use their own language and to exercise their own religion freely therein.
ARTICLE 41.
As regards public instruction, the Turkish Government will grant in those towns and districts, where a considerable proportion of non-Moslem nationals are resident, adequate facilities for ensuring that in the primary schools the instruction shall be given to the children of such Turkish nationals through the medium of their own language. This provision will not prevent the Turkish Government from making the teaching of the Turkish language obligatory in the said schools.
In towns and districts where there is a considerable proportion of Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities, these minorities shall be assured an equitable share in the enjoyment and application of the sums which may be provided out of public funds under the State, municipal or other budgets for educational, religious, or charitable purposes.
The sums in question shall be paid to the qualified representatives of the establishments and institutions concerned.
ARTICLE 42.
The Turkish Government undertakes to take, as regards non-Moslem minorities, in so far as concerns their family law or personal status, measures permitting the settlement of these questions in accordance with the customs of those minorities.
These measures will be elaborated by special Commissions composed of representatives of the Turkish Government and of representatives of each of the minorities concerned in equal number. In case of divergence, the Turkish Government and the Council of the League of Nations will appoint in agreement an umpire chosen from amongst European lawyers.
The Turkish Government undertakes to grant full protection to the churches, synagogues, cemeteries, and other religious establishments of the above-mentioned minorities. All facilities and authorisation will be granted to the pious foundations, and to the religious and charitable institutions of the said minorities at present existing in Turkey, and the Turkish Government will not refuse, for the formation of new religious and charitable institu- tions, any of the necessary facilities which are guaranteed to other private institutions of that nature.
ARTICLE 43.
Turkish nationals belonging to non-Moslem minorities shall not be compelled to perform any act which constitutes a violation of their faith or religious observances, and shall not be placed under any disability by reason of their refusal to attend Courts of Law or to perform any legal business on their weekly day of rest.
This provision, however, shall not exempt such Turkish nationals from such obligations as shall be imposed upon all other Turkish nationals for the preservation of public order.''
All these articles were not only ignored by Turkey, they continually violated them with the peak being the pogrom against the Greeks in Istanbul in 1955, where a large mob of Turks attacked and destroyed hundreds of houses, shops, schools, churches and even cemeteries of the Greek minority, including the raping and killing of a large number of Greek people. In result to that, 250-300,000 Greeks forcibly left the city and their properties were confiscated by the Turkish state.
Let me give you another example,
Treaty of Lausanne:
Article 13 paragraph 2: ''Greek military aircraft will be forbidden to fly over the territory of the Anatolian coast. Reciprocally, the Turkish Government will forbid their military aircraft to fly over the said islands.'' (meaning the aforementioned islands of Lesbos, Chios, Samos and Ikaria)
Turkish planes have been repeatedly flying over these islands since decades now, harassing the people with low flights etc.
This is absolutely correct but it must be remembered that the Treaty doesn't exist in a vacuum the Treaty which is actually one of the worst treaties in history, exists because it has parties who are signatories to it like any treaties (hence the name) and the other Balkan Treaties like London, or Berlin. If the sections of the treaty on each party and kept to and the signatories do not hold the parties to their agreements within the treaty then that treaty whatever that treaty is has become worthless.
Με λίγα λόγια την έχουν κάνει κουρελόχαρτο
You should consider making a video about the west Sahara
I was planning to visit my lovely Ikaria this summer and if it ruins because of this bs, I will be pissed
Para bol galiba Euro ile calisiosun sanırım...bu ülkenin tek istediği şey adalara beleşe tatile gitmek 🤣🤣🤣🤣
savaş çıkacak tatil düşünüyor :D yunan
@@Nightplx cok ozur dileriz komsularimizla iyi iliskiler istedigimiz icin
AKP means ''Justice and Development Party''
by saying AKP party you are actually saying Justice and Development Party Party, lol
opposite of what they are doing
It's pronounced differently in Turkish lol
we call greece "Yunanistan". Did you understand
I have an even better idea, what if Greece reinstated the megali idea and took the Turkish coast? Then turkey won't have to worry about its EEZ anymore, win-win 🥴
Good luck with that.
Dont give them ideas there will be a very shitty war and Turkey will probably win it. Although it would be devastating for both parties.
@@exosproudmamabear558 Good idea. Try and see Turkish flag over the Acropolis 👍
@@recepkucuk6516 you only have drones we are armed to the teeth and with secret weapons all the aegean is boobytraped remember that little mongol you will be swiming back to mongolia
they are free to try, but let them think about the end, once the war has started, we don't think about the end, we will go to the end
Please talk about Ecosia they are a search engine that plants tress
Yeay .
Come on guys.!
down Limassol town for coffee..!
most people don't understand the situation because their countries don't have islands or as many as we do and they don't get that mainland=islands for Greek people the islands are as important , as any other place in mainland Greece . it just happen to have sea instead of ground in between. Those islands were are and they are gonna be Greek till the end of time.
Lol sure dude the meis island is just 2km away from turkey and it is used by the Greek government to extradite people who are against the government just like the French did when they didn’t like officers they send them to Haiti but there is a little problem about this for Greece Haiti was an ocean away while meis in your words is “mainland Greece” sure dude whatever you believe
@@alpacino6859 You are ignoring islands like Chios, Lesvos, Samos, Rhodes , Crete , Karpathos etc that have thousands of people living there for hundreds of years. Greek islands are not just greek on the map, they have history and a special relationship with the sea from which they live off of
Maybe fix that 70%+ inflation first :3
We fix it right away just because you said it mdosmdpsmdd
@@kira-tm7pk 73% now💪
It'll be fixed when the government change do not worry. But how are you going to fix your military equipment in case of a war though? Wait for European daddies to ship you goods and you pay pay for them on your knees taking it from the back :)
Even if it becomes 32498% we will still defend our rights and even bleed for it if needed.
@@taf2026 yet its recession time baby
We talking about Greece first. I did not say that Cyprus has no EEZ . The big circle is Continental Shelf and inner circle is EEZ . U can not mix them . If there is connection within 200miles with mainland country and an island , island may have limited EEZ due first circle but u Just treat that u are an island in open sea.. Come on
in 2022 Turkey Draws maps and think they will get sea and islands from Greece...Are they Crazy?
Let them
If they invaded our land, it will give us a reason to retake Constantinople and the rest of Anatolia.
@B B yes
Stop exaggerating your claims..you mention Turkey is claiming ‘much of the Mediterranean’…but what you show on the map as per Turkey’s claim is but a fraction of the Mediterranean Sea.
Not a big fan of turkey, but please use your terms correctly to convey your point without using false terms.
i guess they meant Eastern Mediterranean
Yes they claim much of Mediterranean sea. If you knew about international laws you would know that.
GREEC 🇬🇷❤️🇹🇷TURKEY YES
yaw dayı s.g söyle m4l m4l şeyler yazıp durma suraya
🇹🇷❤️🇬🇷
Sadly not everyone like that
🇹🇷👎🤡
Seville map is the most awkward map ever which only serves eu interests!!! Son of bitches.
Currency rate USD/TRY = 17.0000! Enjoy!
It's heartbreaking..
I post my comment on the answer of a Turk claiming a lot of false things, as it seems that the majority of Turkish people support what he says:
I am sorry but your whole narrative is not only extremely biased, it is also full of holes. I will now proceed to adress your extraordinary claims one by one:
Before I begin though, since I see that you mention the Treaty of Lausanne repeatedly, I would suggest you actually read the Treaty yourself, instead of hearing about it in the Turkish news.
1i) You say that: ''Mavi Vatan docrine is based on 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty signed between Greece and Turkey. This agreement sets the territorial waters to 3 nautical miles''
1ii) Firstly, the treaty of Lausanne is a treaty signed by a number of countries, not just Greece and Turkey, and I'm not saying that for minor reasons, I'm saying it because it means that those countries are legaly obliged to honour and secure the treaty as well. As for the 3 nautical miles, these are referenced 2 times. In the article 12, it is stated that ''Except where a provision to the contrary is contained in the present Treaty, the islands situated at less than three miles from the Asiatic coast remain under Turkish sovereignty.'' The second is in the article 6, where it states: ''In the absence of provisions to the contrary, in the present Treaty, islands and islets Iying within three miles of the coast are included within the frontier of the coastal State.'' This is a reference to Turkey, and it states nothing whatsoever about territorial waters, as we know the term today. It just means that the borders of Greece in the Aegean were set at a distance of 3 nautical miles from the coast of Turkey.
2i) You say that: ''in 1936 (when there was no UNCLOS) Greece unilaterally raised its territorial waters to 6 nautical miles (in violation of the peace treaty). Thus Greece took the first step to create a change to the peaceful stability of the Aegean. Turkey resisted this revisionism till 1960's and then raised its own territorial waters to 6 nautical miles as a means to create equality across the shores.''
2ii) The two countries actually had their territorial waters extend to 3 miles, not because of any treaty signed between them, but because they had the right to do so in accordance to the newly formed laws of the sea at that time. The laws about territorial waters have changed over the course of history allowing the countries to go from 3 miles, to 6 miles, and finally 12 miles at is today. Greece extended its territorial waters in 1936 indeed, because it could now extend them from 3 to 6 miles according to the new laws. But this act was not a violation of any treaty between Turkey and Greece, as I stated before, as there were no agreement between them for the territorial waters. In 1964, Turkey extended its territorial waters from 3 to 6 nautical miles in the Aegean, while applying 12 miles extension to the eastern Mediterranean and the Black Sea. As far as I'm concerned, the Greek government did not say anything to object this decision.
3i) You say that: ''First of all UNCLOS states that islands can only have the same amount of eez with a mainland, if the said islands constitute an archipelagic state. Archipelagic states do not have any mainlands, so for example like Japan. Greece is currently claiming maximal amounts of exclusive economic zone, for Greece claims that its islands constitute an archipelagic state... yet as we all know Greek islands are not an independent state and are part of the Greek country which has a mainland. Since Greece is a mainland country with islands, unlike Japan, technically Greek islands can only possess territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine underlines this and states that in the Aegean sea, all those Greek islands which lay on eastern side of the mid line, can have an eez only insofar as their territorial waters.''
3ii) No, it doesn't state that in any way. In the part VIII of the UNCLOS treaty, which concerns the islands, it is stated that: ''Except as provided for in paragraph 3, the territorial sea, the
contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of an
island are determined in accordance with the provisions of this Convention
applicable to other land territory.'', with Paragraph 3 being: ''Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of
their own shall have no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.'' Of course, since there are thousands of islets in the Mediterranean, there are some that truly cannot sustain human habitation, but those are around the habitated Greek islands, which have their own EEZ, as stated by the UNCLOS treaty, so it makes no difference.
Also, the article I mentioned applies to all states, not just archipelagic states as you claimed.
You should also take a look again at the Mavi Vatan doctrine, as it completely denies any rights to the EEZ to the archipelagic state of Cyprus (which Turkey is the only country in the world to not recognize), and also (very ironically) gives EEZ rights to the occupied northern part of Cyprus.
4i) You say that: ''Mavi Vatan doctrine shows ICJ cases between UK-France, Spain-Morocco, Canada-France and many others to support its claims. For example Jersey Islands which belong to UK but are closer to the French Riviera only have territorial waters. Yet if UK followed Greek logic, the entire channel sea would belong to UK. Similarly if Spain followed Greek logic Morocco would have almost no sea in the mediterranean. Yet thankfully ICJ denied these claims.''
4ii) I highly suggest that you look on the map of the EEZ of Uk, France and Spain, you will be surprised to see that all these countries have applied the EEZ of their islands (some of them ar half way across the world by the way) and their mainland alike. This includes the 12 nautical miles extension, which Greece is the only country in the world that hasn't applied its legal claim, because it is threatened by Turkey not do so. Also, the Channel Islands (the Jersey islands that you mentioned) do have an EEZ, it's just not part of the EEZ of the mainland United Kingdom. By your logic, they shouldn't have, and France should have the EEZ of their area, yet it's the complete opposite, lol.
5i) You say that: '' As for the EEZ, international law principles state that mainlands have superiority to islands when there are no island states in question, thus Turkey's claims are legal.''
5ii) Please prove, how is any of the Greek islands right now ilegally occupied? With documents of course, not extravagant claims. Even if you find 1 (Which you won't) unfortunately for you, the EEZ still applies for all the other thousands of islands.
6i) You say that: ''Lastly Greece says that Turkey and Greece should go to ICJ to solve the EEZ issue in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece then uses this recommendation to show the world that Turkey is not intending to go to ICJ and is therefore a state which doesnt respect law. Yet Turkey states that it is willing to go to ICJ, but Turkey also states that if both of these countries go to ICJ they need to go for all issues aka both Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Essentially Turkey says that one cannot solve Eastern Mediterranean maritime delimitation without delimiting the Aegean sea. Greece on the other hand assumes that there is nothing wrong with the Aegean thus only Eastern Mediterranean should be taken to the court. Turkey as a response states that there are superior issues within the Aegean which will affect the Eastern Mediterranean issue thus the Aegean must be solved in the courts first.''
6ii) Believe me, if Turkey had the law advantage it would have gone to the ICJ to solve the dispute years before. You do know that the ICJ works by the right of UNCLOS right? That does not favor Turkey so they do not want to go that way, they are claiming that Turkey and Greece should not solve disputes through other countries and laws but between themselves, in order to hide the fact that it is not favoured by any international law, hence why they won't ever agree to solve the dispute through ICJ. There is not a single time where Turkey asked Greece to solve the Aegean dispute, aside from the eastern Mediterranean, and Greece refused.
What's the difference between ocean "within the frontier of a coastal state" and "territorial waters"?
Theres is still no UNCLOS for Turkiye.
Greece refuses ICJ jurisdiction for anything except continental shelf issue. There is not much to discuss because of this.
@@muptanyesiloglu8700 Copy and Paste False information
Some parts are true but some parts are so biased against Turkey.
Nothing is biased, the only biased is the "unfairly benefits" which is just a personal opinion. Law doesn't care about your fellings.
Get used to those facts
@@thesoundinyourhead1782 To be not biased , he should give each sides arguments in his video. So we can compare both their arguments and decide which side is more right than other. In this video he is generally,no almost completely looking from Greece's window. I think I'm not the one who is writing according to his feelings.
@@emirhanyldz2342 because every other thing turkey claims is absurd and non-logical. What? The militarization of islands that supposedly disputes sovereignty?
@@thesoundinyourhead1782 Because according to Lausanne and Paris traties that greece signed, these island were given greece.One of the condition is "unarmed" islands.I don't say that my country's every action is true and rightful but in this case Turkey is right. However it is okay that Greece feel threatened by Erdogan's high volume speechs but what Micotakis did in the America and arming the islands is not the way feel safe. I hope one day our nations can find a way to get along but it is so unlikely with current presidents.
@@emirhanyldz2342 no.
Turkey is not signatory to Paris treaty, Italy and Greece were, so according to Vienna convention and rules of diplomacy, Turkey cant have a call upon this.
Greek islands first were militarized almost 50 years ago, which is almost half a century, after Cyprus invasion when Turkey threatened them. Greece according to UN charter and article 51, no matter what any treaty says, still has the right for self defense.
Are Greek islands threatened?
Yes,
with Casus Beli if Greece extends its territorial waters to 12nm with the right it has as 160+ countries have already done,
with military drills simulating ampibious landing and island control,
with overflights above greek inhabited islands, violating article 13 of treaty of Lausanne,
with Imia in 1996.
It's not right what you suggest about maritime law, i suggest you to investigate about international EEZ trial between UK and France in 1977. France was defending the same hypotesis with Turkey has. Guernsey and Jersey islets are so close to mainland of France and they refused to share midline from the islets. It doesnt related with Ottoman expansionism. Greece has expansionist ambitions you told by yourself they want to take 50.000 km square maritime zone for 2 km square islet. They have expanded their borders for 12 times since 1829 against Turkey. They have been taken over the control of Eagean Islands from Mussolini's Italy with international agreements which includes the condition of demilitarization. They place illegally full loads of weapons to islands so close to Turkey's mainland and they live for the Megali Idea dream to invade west half of Turkish mainland which they did in 1919-1922.
This channels anti-Turkish propaganda is on a rising trend. You lost a subscriber. Many to follow hopefully
Great video.
I am from Rhodes.
We are Greeks to the bone.
We speak greek and follow all the greek traditions. The number of people that have a Turkish lineage is not greater than a few hundreds and they consider themselves as greek citizens. The 'minority protection' rhetoric is utterly unrealistic and reminds me of the Russian rhetoric that led to war. I am really sympathetic towards Turkish people and a kanun (shared instrument between Greeks and Turks) teacher.
It is really stressful and sad for all of us who live on the Aegean islands to hear Turkish jets flying above our heads nearly every week for the last 20 years. This is what we are experiencing on the ground.
I hope the situation doesn't escalate further...
Mavi Vatan docrine is based on 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty signed between Greece and Turkey. This agreement sets the territorial waters to 3 nautical miles, in 1936 (when there was no UNCLOS) Greece unilaterally raised its territorial waters to 6 nautical miles (in violation of the peace treaty). Thus Greece took the first step to create a change to the peaceful stability of the Aegean. Turkey resisted this revisionism till 1960's and then raised its own territorial waters to 6 nautical miles as a means to create equality across the shores. Essentially both of these countries are legally obligated by the 1923 Lausanne Treaty to return their Territorial waters back to 3 nautical miles. This will ensure peace and stability. As for the exclusive economic zone aka the waters that lay beyond territorial waters to which the coastal country has economic rights to, issues are bit more complicated. First of all UNCLOS states that islands can only have the same amount of eez with a mainland, if the said islands constitute an archipelagic state. Archipelagic states do not have any mainlands, so for example like Japan. Greece is currently claiming maximal amounts of exclusive economic zone, for Greece claims that its islands constitute an archipelagic state... yet as we all know Greek islands are not an independent state and are part of the Greek country which has a mainland. Since Greece is a mainland country with islands, unlike Japan, technically Greek islands can only possess territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine underlines this and states that in the Aegean sea, all those Greek islands which lay on eastern side of the mid line, can have an eez only insofar as their territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine shows ICJ cases between UK-France, Spain-Morocco, Canada-France and many others to support its claims. For example Jersey Islands which belong to UK but are closer to the French Riviera only have territorial waters. Yet if UK followed Greek logic, the entire channel sea would belong to UK. Similarly if Spain followed Greek logic Morocco would have almost no sea in the mediterranean. Yet thankfully ICJ denied these claims. THE PROBLEM IS, even legally valid claims of Turkey are being manipulated by the media. Erdogans negative image is utilized to discredit Turkey's legal claims. However Mavi Vatan doctrine is supported by the entire nation regardless of political affiliation. The solution to all these problems are in the 1923 Lausanne Treaty which was established to create a stable and peaceful Aegean. As for the EEZ, international law principles state that mainlands have superiority to islands when there are no island states in question, thus Turkey's claims are legal. Lastly Greece says that Turkey and Greece should go to ICJ to solve the EEZ issue in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece then uses this recommendation to show the world that Turkey is not intending to go to ICJ and is therefore a state which doesnt respect law. Yet Turkey states that it is willing to go to ICJ, but Turkey also states that if both of these countries go to ICJ they need to go for all issues aka both Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Essentially Turkey says that one cannot solve Eastern Mediterranean maritime delimitation without delimiting the Aegean sea. Greece on the other hand assumes that there is nothing wrong with the Aegean thus only Eastern Mediterranean should be taken to the court. Turkey as a response states that there are superior issues within the Aegean which will affect the Eastern Mediterranean issue thus the Aegean must be solved in the courts first. For Turkey the issues in the Aegean include: The Demilitarized status of the Greek Aegean islands next to Turkish riviera; the legal owner of certain islands which were never ceded to Greece with 1923 Lausanne Treaty. So Erdogan recently said, if demilitarized islands are kept militarized in violation of the Lausanne Treaty, their sovereignity will be open to question. Most western media portrayed this as Erdogan being Putin Jr and Greece as Ukraine. Yet the reality is different 1923 Lausanne Treaty names each and every island transferred to Greece and adds that this transfer is dependent on the demilitarized status of the islands. In international law this means that once these islands are militarized the contract/treaty of transfer is violated and therefore Greek ownership of the islands returns to pre 1923. Essentially Turkey does not want these islands, which is why up until today and ever since 1960's Turkey only gave notes and letters to Greece and UN stating that it is observing the violation and urging Greece to abide by the 1923 Treaty... however in 2022 it seems that Turkey ran out of patience. Erdogan stated that Turkeys patience in this issue has been received as compromise by the Greeks, so he stated that Turkey is not Joking when it comes to safe-keeping its rights secured by the 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty. Bear in mind that 1923 Lausanne Treaty was signed in the aftermath of Greek attempt to invade western Turkey. After Greece lost this treaty was signed. AKA Turkey shed blood to have this Treaty. Turkey sees this treaty as the legal ground of its existance, so when Greece (the old invader) attempts to revise the clauses of the treaty Turkey is claiming that its entire existance is threatened for it says international law is ignored by Greece. The irony is since the Western media has an undeniable bias towards Greece, the general masses do not know about the nuances. Let me remind you that ever since 1830's aka establishment of the Greek state, Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks. On the rise of China Russia and Iran, west must realize that Turkey is not a foe but a fucking ally. Yet this bullying attitude to the muslim Turks by the christian western coalition, makes Turkey worried. Turkey doe not see it self part of any camp due to this trust issue, which is why its trying to protect its own rights alone, much like how it did 100 years ago against British, French, Russian, Italian and Greeks. History never forgets, and unfortunately repeats itself. Turks will never shy away from fighting to persevere their rights and dignity. Yet this does not mean Turks are barbaric, that inclination is a mere racist ideology. Turks are humans, who have created many empires with distinct civilizations. Racism or aryanism is not a Turkish ideology, which is why you can find Turkic people from all races and religions. Whether one likes it or not, this is the truth.
@@zeynepceyhan1909 all good points until you started mentioning conspiracy thing, pseudo scientific truth is 1/1 scale what russian believes in
@@shycracker to what are you referring to? Also thanks, these are indeed good points. In no why I am saying they arent for discussion, but we cannot even discuss anything for all platforms are superbly biased and whenever a Turk starts to make points- she is automatically attacked with ad hominems
@@shycracker which one?
İt wasn't 50-60 years ego.
Imagine you have 2800 km coast in Aegean sea but you cannot float your ships there because there are little Greek islands near your country. Ridiculous.
Imagine you are from mongolia and you thnik you have rights on sea
Imagine having a big country like Turkey but you complain over a few islands and Greece having the bigger sea area.
@@antonyaris3 dont cry
@@antonyaris3 It is not something new :) We Turks live here since the battle of manzikert, in 1071. Almost 1000 years have passed, ofcourse we have rights on aegean region. Don’t be ignorant, be informed about the world and adapt yourself to the current era.
@@antonyaris3 imagine you are a greek and being ruled by Turks for 400-450 years:) oh wait it already happened
100 Million people will not get anything from Egean sea and little Greek Island and population is only 3000 will get everything ? Do you think it is farl
First you aren't 100 million and second the unclos as you show in the video allow for a small island to have that much area. I know that you don't like it but you've got to deal with it just like you deal with the rich getting all the wealth and the middle class just a piece.
is there a bet on how many times you guys can say hawkish or what
With 70% inflation, pro-Russia stance, huge financial issues good luck with that.
@Six Sins Erdogan will stay because he is dictator. Turkey stopped being democratic country almost decade ago. Turkey is now enemy of humanity just like Russia and China is.
@Six Sins "so he's here for good" ... You can keep it cupcake! Put it in a leash
@Six Sins tbh erdogan has lost huge portion of its voters over the past 2 years due to economic mismanagement and the fact that almost all stupid decisions he made always backfired on him and affected ordinary turkish people negatively. recent local polls show that the opposition has a chance of knocking him over in upcoming elections, which is scheduled for june 2023, almost 1 year remained. but Im sure turkish people will vote in favor of him anyway despite 100% inflation rates and weakened turkish lira, also erdogan, during his last meeting, lost his temper and insulted those who are against him, he basically referred to people as "bastards" who are against him. imagine a president talking smack of his people when addressing them.
anyway Im sure he will stay in power for extra 4 years or maybe he'll just pass the chair along to one of his dog loyal inner circles and run away with all the money he managed to embezzle during his power, who knows.
@Six Sins I never said that world is living in democracy. Though it would be better than being ruled by single dictator and live by under their brutal psychotic will.
West is the only society on the planet where people are allowed to be free and enjoy their lives as they will. Whetever you think rich elite is controlling it or not, it doesn't refute the fact that western democracy has managed to bring best living standards for people who live under it. Thus therefore it's far more preferable to live under several "rich elite" than live under single dictator.
@Six Sins Whetever you think about who really rules the west, it doesn't refute the fact that people in western nations enjoy most liberty and well being than in any nation on this planet.
Turkey and Greece have been debating about their sea borders since they singed and agreed to them in a treaty the problem here being that it has been discovered recently that there is a lot of oil in the Greek and Cypriot economic zones and Turkey even though it has no claims wants a piece of that
The only problem is that Turkey doesn't follow the Lozane treaty and doesn't accept the international AL sea law... Nothing else
no. We have an agreement and we comply with it. There's no single discovery made in the Turkish coast. Turkey still offers fair share of resources if found. Don't confuse people as claims whilsts we are offering peace and collaboration in order to resolve the conflict.
What GR wants is to exclude Turkey and make news everyday just like now in order to cry and ask for help for fake threts greece produces.
@@konpap1972 🤣🤣Are you for real!!!! According to those treaties Greek islands should only have 3 miles of territorial water.
Source:Trust me Bro
@@yabadabadoo3418 everything outside of 3 nautical miles of Minor Asia (Anatolia), with the exception of Imbros and Tenedos, belongs to Greece. Source: Treaty of Lausanne
The right spelling is 43rd, not 43th.
There is a similar event between England Island and france main land why wouldn'n you talk about that scene? I believe if Greek insist about taking more then 200.000 m2 exclusive economic zone based on that little Island, it is right to take it away from them because they behave like 3 years old child. Think about you have land for agriculture and your neighbour is say that 'part of that land is mine' and bloks you for decates and you cannot operate your own land.. Their political system based on calumny against Turkey.
2:15 It's pronounced like "jam"
They mispronounce French and Spanish common words... Do you seriously expect them to pronounce Turkish correctly?
Question is, do 🦃 swim?
Intelligent comment, thanks for contributing to this discussion
@@smugpug4509 The Greeks are the nation with the best swimming skills in the world. Their high level of swimming abilities come from their genes. They have always swam throughout history.
@@smugpug4509 same the Turks 😂😂😂 and you did swim 🏊♂️ crying from Greece back to Turkeyland 🦃
No but greeks do 🤣🤣🤣
This channel is obviously biased. Turkey's 'plan' you mentioned is aligned with international law of the sea and case law. Turkey has the longest coastline in the Mediterrenian. We can't just give up on our rights. Islands should have only limited continental shelf and eez. They can't be considered as their own mainlands. Greece extending their territorial waters to 12 miles is ridiculous and this is a 'casus belli' for Turkey.
What europeans dont understand is this is not a topic about Erdoğan and his policies. As an Turkish who hates Erdoğan i fully support him on this topic. How can an island with 500 people lives just 2 km far from the Turkish coast can create an eez same size as Netherlands. This is not just at all!! Turkish nation is willing to bleed for this. Are you?
Think a lot of people are going to stand up for international law, just look at Russia and what’s happening to it when they disregard another nations sovereignty
Can you tell me if the greece’s claims are just and fair? Greece have a population of 10 million. There is twice as many people just living on the west and south coasts in Turkey. I dont want any conflict as any sane person. But wont go quiet while this happening also.
If you want to fight for this then go ahead. The international community will not be on your side. The precedent that this would set would be awful. You can't just claim all the surrounding seas as yours. It's imperialism. You don't own those islands, therefore you have no right over the water's surrounding them. Its not the 1909s anymore where nations have empires. You can't just claim more than half of Cyprus' EEZ cos you feel like it. There won't be a war over this cos you ain't stupid enough to do that, cos you'd isolate yourselves even more and be kicked out of NATO. This is a classic example of the kind of nationalism that I'd the very reason the world can never be at peace. Cos there will always be nations like your who think they're 'entitled' to more territory at the expense of others.
If Turkey wants this to change, it has to change it through legal means either via negotiating with Greece or lobbying to change international law.
They can based on international laws
The question is how Turkey get aegean coast? I know it was full of greeks, did the Greece give it for free.
The blood principle is risky and sometime catastrophic
💪🏽🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
There is no such thing as a "Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus". There is only the Republic of Cyprus, with 40% of it's territory being occupied by Turkey.
This is the status of the North given by the international community, security council, etc. So just for future references, call it with it's appropriate name. - Occupied part of Cyprus..
Cope
Cope and seethe.. İt is right there..
Mavi Vatan docrine is based on 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty signed between Greece and Turkey. This agreement sets the territorial waters to 3 nautical miles, in 1936 (when there was no UNCLOS) Greece unilaterally raised its territorial waters to 6 nautical miles (in violation of the peace treaty). Thus Greece took the first step to create a change to the peaceful stability of the Aegean. Turkey resisted this revisionism till 1960's and then raised its own territorial waters to 6 nautical miles as a means to create equality across the shores. Essentially both of these countries are legally obligated by the 1923 Lausanne Treaty to return their Territorial waters back to 3 nautical miles. This will ensure peace and stability. As for the exclusive economic zone aka the waters that lay beyond territorial waters to which the coastal country has economic rights to, issues are bit more complicated. First of all UNCLOS states that islands can only have the same amount of eez with a mainland, if the said islands constitute an archipelagic state. Archipelagic states do not have any mainlands, so for example like Japan. Greece is currently claiming maximal amounts of exclusive economic zone, for Greece claims that its islands constitute an archipelagic state... yet as we all know Greek islands are not an independent state and are part of the Greek country which has a mainland. Since Greece is a mainland country with islands, unlike Japan, technically Greek islands can only possess territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine underlines this and states that in the Aegean sea, all those Greek islands which lay on eastern side of the mid line, can have an eez only insofar as their territorial waters. Mavi Vatan doctrine shows ICJ cases between UK-France, Spain-Morocco, Canada-France and many others to support its claims. For example Jersey Islands which belong to UK but are closer to the French Riviera only have territorial waters. Yet if UK followed Greek logic, the entire channel sea would belong to UK. Similarly if Spain followed Greek logic Morocco would have almost no sea in the mediterranean. Yet thankfully ICJ denied these claims. THE PROBLEM IS, even legally valid claims of Turkey are being manipulated by the media. Erdogans negative image is utilized to discredit Turkey's legal claims. However Mavi Vatan doctrine is supported by the entire nation regardless of political affiliation. The solution to all these problems are in the 1923 Lausanne Treaty which was established to create a stable and peaceful Aegean. As for the EEZ, international law principles state that mainlands have superiority to islands when there are no island states in question, thus Turkey's claims are legal. Lastly Greece says that Turkey and Greece should go to ICJ to solve the EEZ issue in the Eastern Mediterranean. Greece then uses this recommendation to show the world that Turkey is not intending to go to ICJ and is therefore a state which doesnt respect law. Yet Turkey states that it is willing to go to ICJ, but Turkey also states that if both of these countries go to ICJ they need to go for all issues aka both Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean. Essentially Turkey says that one cannot solve Eastern Mediterranean maritime delimitation without delimiting the Aegean sea. Greece on the other hand assumes that there is nothing wrong with the Aegean thus only Eastern Mediterranean should be taken to the court. Turkey as a response states that there are superior issues within the Aegean which will affect the Eastern Mediterranean issue thus the Aegean must be solved in the courts first. For Turkey the issues in the Aegean include: The Demilitarized status of the Greek Aegean islands next to Turkish riviera; the legal owner of certain islands which were never ceded to Greece with 1923 Lausanne Treaty. So Erdogan recently said, if demilitarized islands are kept militarized in violation of the Lausanne Treaty, their sovereignity will be open to question. Most western media portrayed this as Erdogan being Putin Jr and Greece as Ukraine. Yet the reality is different 1923 Lausanne Treaty names each and every island transferred to Greece and adds that this transfer is dependent on the demilitarized status of the islands. In international law this means that once these islands are militarized the contract/treaty of transfer is violated and therefore Greek ownership of the islands returns to pre 1923. Essentially Turkey does not want these islands, which is why up until today and ever since 1960's Turkey only gave notes and letters to Greece and UN stating that it is observing the violation and urging Greece to abide by the 1923 Treaty... however in 2022 it seems that Turkey ran out of patience. Erdogan stated that Turkeys patience in this issue has been received as compromise by the Greeks, so he stated that Turkey is not Joking when it comes to safe-keeping its rights secured by the 1923 Lausanne Peace Treaty. Bear in mind that 1923 Lausanne Treaty was signed in the aftermath of Greek attempt to invade western Turkey. After Greece lost this treaty was signed. AKA Turkey shed blood to have this Treaty. Turkey sees this treaty as the legal ground of its existance, so when Greece (the old invader) attempts to revise the clauses of the treaty Turkey is claiming that its entire existance is threatened for it says international law is ignored by Greece. The irony is since the Western media has an undeniable bias towards Greece, the general masses do not know about the nuances. Let me remind you that ever since 1830's aka establishment of the Greek state, Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks. On the rise of China Russia and Iran, west must realize that Turkey is not a foe but a fucking ally. Yet this bullying attitude to the muslim Turks by the christian western coalition, makes Turkey worried. Turkey doe not see it self part of any camp due to this trust issue, which is why its trying to protect its own rights alone, much like how it did 100 years ago against British, French, Russian, Italian and Greeks. History never forgets, and unfortunately repeats itself. Turks will never shy away from fighting to persevere their rights and dignity. Yet this does not mean Turks are barbaric, that inclination is a mere racist ideology. Turks are humans, who have created many empires with distinct civilizations. Racism or aryanism is not a Turkish ideology, which is why you can find Turkic people from all races and religions. Whether one likes it or not, this is the truth.
@erdal k. So glorious that since nobody is recognizing it has shit economy and even drags your mainland together down 😂 good riddance turks
@@zeynepceyhan1909 Shut your copy and paste boy
They already lived in our byzantine lands they want more ?? Turkey has 1100 greek cities ancient everything visit a museum in Turkey and show me something Turkish or ancient all Greek
If everyone was happy with whay they had, This thing called war would never happened in the world, same stiation is for all the countries including Greece too.
Anatolia is not Greek. Greeks are just another invaders who came from the Balkans and enslaved/murdered Native Anatolians which were namely Hattians, Hittities, Luwians, Phrygians, Lydians, Kaskians, Hurrians, Urartians, Zanes, Trojians and so on.
@@AD-yq8rl ionia always hellenic trojan = hellenic
UNCLOS PART VIII REGIME OF ISLANDS Article 121
"... the territorial sea, the contiguous zone, the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of an
island are determined in accordance with the provisions of this Convention applicable to other land territory."
Where were these explanations and claim during the creation of treaty of Lusanne . You guys forgot to tell your grandfather's to reject the agreement on Lusanne treaty 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
New age with new ideas always take things lightly because they didn't experience of the bloody battle that shaped the Lusanne treaty
You mean thw treaty of Lausanne turkey has violated by flying over greek islands for years now🤫
@@wankawanka3053 Lausanne Treaty says nothing about air boundaries
@@wankawanka3053 Would you also mean Greek war planes flying over Anatolian mainland?
i love my turkish friends, why does it have to be like this?
It doesn't. Greece needs to learn that just because they are in EU does not mean they can get away with anything. Enough is enough, Turkey will do whatever it takes to enforce the rules of the agreements on Greece, whether it is an all-out war or an invasion.
@@bugrayuksel1129 You deny the international law and court solution, we must say enough us enough
@@vaggant5557 Which international law exactly? The UNCLOS which we HAVEN'T SIGNED, or the Treaties between Turkey and Greece which you are ACTIVELY VIOLATING?
@@bugrayuksel1129 Greece needs to learn this and has to do this and that, spoken like a true Hegemon. Hegemon of my dick hahahahaha malaka!!! Come get some butterboys. You will know how the highlanders fight.
@@bugrayuksel1129 Yah denying it and presenting fake document typical irredentism my boy
Here is the second part:
7i) You say that: '' For Turkey the issues in the Aegean include: The Demilitarized status of the Greek Aegean islands next to Turkish riviera; the legal owner of certain islands which were never ceded to Greece with 1923 Lausanne Treaty. So Erdogan recently said, if demilitarized islands are kept militarized in violation of the Lausanne Treaty, their sovereignity will be open to question. Most western media portrayed this as Erdogan being Putin Jr and Greece as Ukraine. Yet the reality is different 1923 Lausanne Treaty names each and every island transferred to Greece and adds that this transfer is dependent on the demilitarized status of the islands. In international law this means that once these islands are militarized the contract/treaty of transfer is violated and therefore Greek ownership of the islands returns to pre 1923.''
7ii) Again, you should read the treaty of Lausanne yourself. There is NO such thing as demilitarization of the islands.
The treaty states in the Article 13 that: ''With a view to ensuring the maintenance of peace, the Greek Government undertakes to observe the following restrictions in the islands of Mytilene, Chios, Samos and Nikaria:
(I) No naval base and no fortification will be established in the said islands.
(2) Greek military aircraft will be forbidden to fly over the territory of the Anatolian coast. Reciprocally, the Turkish Government will forbid their military aircraft to fly over the said islands.
(3) The Greek military forces in the said islands will be limited to the normal contingent called up for military service, which can be trained on the spot, as well as to a force of gendarmerie and police in proportion to the force of gendarmerie and police existing in the whole of the Greek territory.''
These and only these are the restrictions for the 4 islands mentioned above (no other island has any restriction), yet Turkey erroneously claims that ALL islands near the Turkish coast should be demilitarized completely, which is laughable and is not supported by any treaty whatsoever.
The legal ownership of the islands is stated loud and clear, Turkey gets to keep Imbros and Tenedos, and the little islets 3 nautical miles off its coast, and Greece gets to keep the rest. Turkey also completely abandoned its rights to the Dodecanese islands over to Italy, which were given to Greece after WW2 by Italy. By the way all these islands are nearly were and are still inhabited only by Greek population, with the exception of Kos and Rhodes which has a small minority of Turkish people. It doesn't matter if Turkey doesnt like that they gave up their sovereignty over these islands over 100 years ago, Greece may not like that they gave up their claims on Anatolia as well, but what can anyone do about it? Countries must accept these things, or the world would be a jungle with constant wars all the time, and nobody really wants that.
8i) You say that: ''Bear in mind that 1923 Lausanne Treaty was signed in the aftermath of Greek attempt to invade western Turkey. After Greece lost this treaty was signed. AKA Turkey shed blood to have this Treaty. Turkey sees this treaty as the legal ground of its existance, so when Greece (the old invader) attempts to revise the clauses of the treaty Turkey is claiming that its entire existance is threatened for it says international law is ignored by Greece.''
8ii) Greece didn't wake up one day and said I want to conquer some lands, the mass killings (genocide) of Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians and other minorities in Anatolia during and after WWI are a fact and only Turkey does not accept them. Greece interevened in order to protect its population, the same reason Turkey uses for their invasion of Cyprus, yet the situations are not even comparable. Both countries shed blood and accepted this peace treaty, which is why both countries should honour it and not shed blood again.
9i) You say that: ''Let me remind you that ever since 1830's aka establishment of the Greek state, Greece has expanded its territory around 6 times. In each time it carved some area from Ottomans (Turks). So if one is to search for a revisionist state history points to the Greeks not the Turks.''
9ii) Ottoman empire does not equal Turks, by that logic the Young Turks went against the Turks to establish a republic. You know very well that Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia and other countries invaded the Ottoman empire in order to assimilate the people, of course they were war crimes commited by all sides, but painting Greece as an invader on the basis of the Ottoman empire is absurd.
10i) You say that: ''Yet this bullying attitude to the muslim Turks by the christian western coalition, makes Turkey worried.''
10ii) I know that it may come as a surprise but most of the European countries are not even ''christian'', especially Western Europe, which is now mostly atheist. Yet Erdogan uses terms such as crusaders etc. which are extremely anachronistic and only apply to people with no real knowledge of geopolitics.
11i) Turkey doe not see it self part of any camp due to this trust issue, which is why its trying to protect its own rights alone, much like how it did 100 years ago against British, French, Russian, Italian and Greeks.
11ii) Turkey does not see itself part of any camp because it has made everyone their enemies with its extremely aggressive behaviour. There are many countries invaded by other countries over the duration of history, Germany invaded and occupied Greece, destroying its people and its economy, yet Greece has got over it and is now within the same European Union. It's time Turkey got over of what happened 100 years ago. Plus the Russians were not Turkey's enemies during 1919-1922, the Soviet Union even supplied Turkey with weapons.
12i) You say that: ''Yet this does not mean Turks are barbaric, that inclination is a mere racist ideology. Turks are humans, who have created many empires with distinct civilizations. Racism or aryanism is not a Turkish ideology, which is why you can find Turkic people from all races and religions. Whether one likes it or not, this is the truth.''
12ii) No, it has nothing to do with race, Turks are a pretty mixed race anyways, it all has to do with the current mindset of the people. When your own president says ''We will throw you to the sea to swim like we did before'' and other War threats, and the whole common people cheer, it does say something about the people. Plus, Turks are infamous for despising nearly all their neighbours and their neighbours' neighbours. Turks really hate Kurdish people, and they consider Armenian people at the very lowest, so don't be so quick to accuse others of racism. Plus, let's not just overlook all the Neo-Ottoman sentiments, speeches of a new empire, the Pan-Turkism theories etc.
Turkey militirized Imbros and Tenedos first thus voiding the said contract.
@@SadisticNinja Yes, that is one of many times that Turkey has violated the treaty, I also mention other violations in my third comment.
You wasted your time man, you could just write im stupid and we would understand and accept it.
@@yasingursel1611 Such an overwhelming argument to defend your point of view. I know it must be hard to answer to all of those facts that I mentioned, so you resort in childish insults. Pretty much an amalgamation of Turkish foreign policy.
@@balkanmountains2103 I'm just tired bro, I can write for an hour but I don't want to waste my time either. Have a nice day :*
What are they smoking. So UK, Australia, and any nation with islands or are islands have no rights
Islands have no rights because Turkey doesn’t have islands. If Turkey had islands it would be the first to support the right of islands.
Turkey thinks it shares sea borders with Libya not Greece 😅 Erdogan in his mind pretends Greece doesn’t even exist
Thsoe countries are archelapgeo(island) states..but Greece isn't.. Any other nation with location of Turkey would do the same
@@Polo-rn8ly France would like to disagree with you
So... You are still writing it "Turkey"... hmmmmmmm :D
Turkey will never go to ICJ over EEZ borders cause they know that they might gain some square miles in Kastelorrizo but will lose in the rest of the Aegean islands and that will be the end of Mavi Vatan.
Are you Greek ?
@@jaeger9374 and what if ???
@@jaeger9374Are you German?
Cancel your reservation in ICJ that refuse to recognize authority of ICJ about territorial water and airspace limitations and military activities, then let's see who is right and winning the case!
@@oguzhancan5477Read again what are you writting and if it makes sense let me know !!!
Important corrections: UNCLOS predicts 24 miles nautical zone for jurisdiction. Libya did not sign the agreement, Libya is in civil war so political institutions do not work properly as in this case, so the agreement is null and void.
There is one think here to understand. Greek İsland Kastellorizo could have territorial water but could’t have any EZZ because of Turkey’s mainland and it’s own EZZ. Greece is not a country like Indonesia therefore its islands between two mainlands (Turkey and Eagypt) can not bloke one of this mainlands EZZ. Kastellorizo is just a plan to steal Turkey’s EZZ and the main actor is hear not Greece! EU and USA play this game against Turkey and if you look at the Sevillamap which it is not a official map, which describe the EZZ in this territory but if you look in this map, you will see that they join the Greece EZZ with Cyprus EZZ. But this is really bullshit. Cyprus has two different territory and country in it. The southpart of Cyprus can not claim the all island as it belongs it. There was a war at this island because of post greek patriots( read the history in wikipedia, why there was a war in cyprus)
Turkey had zero problems with the borders when they became a country
To not risk a war, yes. Now that we can risk a war, why not? It is unfair to us, and the moment has come. Either Greeks agree to a fair-share, or we enforce the fair-share.
Yes, because the islands were under Italian control. When Germany invaded Greece, it offered to give the Islands to Turkey, but Turkey remained neutral and refused the islands.
@@bugrayuksel1129 kid we don't care about your feelings you should grow up and learn to respect the international law but i guess everything can ve explained easily since erdogan is gonna have a rough time with the new elections plus your inflation rate just reached 73% no wonder he wants to distract you all
@@sbd03 well too bad
you forgot to add that the shiny new Roles Royce jet engines for the Turkish TFX jet will be fully supporting of the Mavi vatan blue homeland Turkish dreams.
They'll be test engines, for the first Block0 jets. The mass production engine will be indigenously built if I recall right.
@@bugrayuksel1129 turkey don't produce anything kid, why don't you open your eyes you beging for F16 upgrade and Altay engines from korea, this are turkish fairy tails kid the only mass production turkey is doing in bread my friend
@@vassilisioannou5488 Sure, whatever you say. Altay is a failed project, nobody's denying that. Turkey is requesting F-16s from the U.S., sure. What about the other stuff you are so scared of mentioning?
Turkey is one of the biggest drone suppliers. Turkey has a ballistic range inventory that varies in range from 120km to 900km. Turkey has several cruise missiles, one of which is an anti-ship kind. If you think that is not enough, you should take a look at our ground vehicles, which are being exported to tens of countries all around the world. And if you still think that is not enough, how about some corvettes? Or maybe frigates, submarines, and an amphibious assault ship really soon. You keep on telling that to yourself kiddo, just as the Russians did, I bet those ship crews did regret those words really fast...
@@bugrayuksel1129 those are not a threat to Greece unfortunately kiddo, patriot pac3 is an air defense system for your in information anti ballistic missiles too, cheap drones won't save you kid T6 Texan II will shot them down like playing video games, and Greece have ballistic missiles and cruz missiles to wich are way better with longer ranges like scalp EG with 600km range so if I were you I would keep your la la land tails to my self kiddo.
@enver pasha yes I know, when you reach our level then talk Turkish dreamer
Treaty of Lausanne, the maritime jurisdiction area is 3 miles. Greece opposed the agreement by increasing it to 6 miles. Then Turkey went up to 6 miles. Actually, Turkey was supposed to stick to the agreement and not do it.
Turkey left the islands and rocks it left to Greece on the condition not to arm them, but Greece even placed air defense systems and multiple rocket launchers there.
They wants something that is not accepted in the world and wants the islands it owns to have maritime jurisdiction. If it is accepted in this world, many countries will have to fight. Maritime jurisdictions are calculated with reference to the mainland.
you crazy or what?
the international law , which is above any local agreement, defines the minimum of 6 miles. And the last changes , give the ability to raise that to 12 miles, without asking anyone.
I don't know if Lausanne really says for 3 miles , I have go read that, but even if it did, that can't change the international LAW.
@@wakeno.6047 There are many decisions in the world that the islands do not naturally have the right to create a continental shelf and exclusive economic zone. International law aims to reach a just solution in delimitations.
- In the case between England and France in 1977, it was decided to completely surround the islands close to the French coast and not to give them the right to the continental shelf.
- In the case between Malta and Libya in 1984, equidistance to Malta was not taken into account, Libya was given more maritime jurisdiction.
- Between Tunisia and Libya, the Italian islands close to the Tunisian coast were not granted a continental shelf and an exclusive economic zone beyond the territorial waters.
- In the 2012 lawsuit between Nicaragua and Colombia, the Colombian islands were located off the coast of Nicaragua. These islands were also not given influence beyond the territorial waters.
@@buraktufekci9615 bro only 4 isalnds should be unarmed have u even read the lozani agreement?Not all islands
@@buraktufekci9615 First of all UNCLOS III came into force in 1994. Anything before that was under different laws.
Secondly while the 12 NM of territorials waters of islands are non-negotiable under UNCLOS it is true that EEZ is open to negotiations and if those fail the matter is tranfered to the Internation Court of Justice.
Problem is that turkey neither recognizes the international law nor the ICJ unless it is of benefit to them such as in the case of Blac Sea that they use 12NM territorial waters while not signing UNCLOS themselves.
Lausanne doesn't have to do neither with territorial water nor EEZ but land. The 3 n.m you mention are indeed states in Lausanne Treaty but for different purpose. According to Lausanne all islands more than 3 n.m from anatolian coast belong to Greece and less than 3 n.m belong to Turkey. When Lausanne Treaty was signed there wasn't any knowledge on EEZ. These came up later with UNCLOS when Turkey suddenly realized that things don't suit it anymore.
lussanne agrement 13 chart states that sovereignity of greece on agean sea depends on demilitarization of island,
it means , if greece militarize islands, turkey no needs to recognize greece sovereignitu on islands, additionally, there are over 300 islets on agean, which were not mentioned in agreement, so, ...
The treaty also said that The Greek minority of Constantinople would be protected and there bare only 2.000 left. Dirty hypocrites. You were the first ones to violate the treaty in 1955, much before the invasion of Cyprus and the massarces. Hypocrites
Nonsense. You've been lied to. Article 12 doesn't say a word about demilitarization.
On the contrary Article 12 states:
"Except where a provision to the contrary is contained in the
present Treaty, the islands situated at less than three miles from
the Asiatic coast remain under Turkish sovereignty"
And in Article 16.
Turkey hereby renounces all rights and title whatsoever over or
respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in
the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her
sovereignty is recognised by the said Treaty, the future of these
territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties
concerned."
So all you got is 3 miles of the coast of Turkey. That's it. Get over it
@@bloodangel9403 lusanna 13, paris 1947 14, according to article, except, police and ganadarma, greece can not put army on island, not 12, 13,
@@jyeshta8357 Wrong. “The Greek military forces in the said islands will be
limited to the normal contingent called up for military
service, which can be trained on the spot,”
Also Turkey is not a signatory part of the Treaty of Paris , so you don’t have a say in it.
@@bloodangel9403 πως το πετσοκοψες έτσι!!! 👏🏻
Greece is not a country, it is a province of France.
?
Turkey is not a country, it's a hotel for terrorists and autocrats :D
Not France, USA
Yet