Rachel Wilson Goes OFF On Tone-Policing Feminists And DEFENDS Andrew
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 ноя 2024
- 🔗 Full video: • Rachel Wilson DEBATES ...
📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time
▶️ WATCH LIVE: www.youtube.co...
💎 Join: ruclips.net/user/wha...
📺 Patreon: / whatever
👕 Merch: shop.whatever.com
💵 Tip Jar: paypal.com/dona...
🎥 Equipment: amazon.com/shop...
📘 Facebook: / whatever
🐦 Twitter: / whatever
📷 Instagram: / whatever
👾 Twitch: / whatever
👽 Reddit: / whatever
🏴☠️ Brian: / bd_atlas
🌴 Linktree: linktr.ee/whatever
🎧 Listen: anchor.fm/what...
Tone policing is a cheap trick to control the argument without engaging the argument.
And it usually works because it’s usually women using it against men and everyone sticks to them
@airthrowDBT i've believed for awhile now that "straw mans" are just subtle changing of the topic, regardless of if it's intentional.
@airthrowDBT are we can all be more professional and talk with our inside voice....sorry not sorry. When Charlie kirk or this lady yells at someone it's okay but if a liberal like hasan does it all of a sudden there is an issue. I can show you debates where people on the right tone police the left lol how about we all just talk with a manner that is respectful. It's not hard but apparently it is.
@@LayarionI could be wrong...but I'm usually not... a straw man arugment is when you take someone else's words in a debate and miss use/repersent them or miss quote them.
@airthrowDBT lol you wrote all that but your missing my point. You can yell and be right. Where did I say you can't yell and not be right? And yes yelling is a change of tone. The issue is being respectful. If you want people to listen and respect you guess what you should probably be what....respectful lol its common sense.
Man - "LOOK OUT!"
Woman - "How dare you shout at me! You made me feel ba- OW! WHY DIDN'T YOU WARN ME ABOUT THAT ROCK!?"
😅
I wish this was less true but growing up in a house that was majority women taught me otherwise. It hardly even mattered how "nice and compassionate" I attempted to make it. If any one of them was in a bad mood it was met with "No! I don't need to do that", "I just can't deal with it right now", or "I didn't mean to do that (for the 1000th time)."
The girl in the red shirt is falsely conflating compassion with being nice. Sometimes the most compassionate thing you can do for someone is to not be nice and tell them the truth they do not want to hear.
"Tough love" is lost on most women. That's why single mothers fail so hard.
This is why in the past, people were shunned by the rest of the community for certain behaviors. No, it was not "hate." The shunners don't enjoy it either. They realized it was necessary because if the behavior spread, you would get the insanity we have today.
I agree with you.
And I think that the feminist doesn't understand neither the scriptures nor Christianity.
@@savedwretch8711
That is because Christianity goes completely against Feminism.
There is no such thing as Feminism in Christianity.
Unless you're talking to woman. She will sit down and stew in hatred because you're right. 😂
The less intelligent people use mockery and insults when they lose
i bet andrew is so fucking proud of her , i salute your IDGAF attitude towards the rest of the panel´s fiffys
jeebus she even sounds like andrew. not a complaint
Red…. GET TO THE POINT!!!! You drone and drone instead of actually asking the question….. you filibuster then whine about tone
she looks like him,the eyes... inbred? sister wife?
Female here. I am on Andrew's and Rachel Wilson's side. All of her opponents are just spewing emotion.
Get on the IDGAF+ Movement.
Rachel absolutely roasted these feminists. They should be embarrassed and go hide in shame from this video. This clip should follow them and cause them embarrassment for a very long time.
Rachel is leftovers
What if she had the opposite point of view w the same tone and attack basically? Would you say the same?
@KathrynKLNA 😂😂 no one cares logic beats feelings. The only problem is that men keep going along to get along. Pandering to women like you. Go Jam out to T Swift and get over it.
The topic is lost because they cant get over she doesn't care about their opinion.
She's in her feelings. THIS is why women (there are exceptions) shouldn't be in charge of companies.
@@niallfitzpatrick6568 Or anything but children
@@niallfitzpatrick6568 💯💯💯💯💯 especially between the ages of 18 and 35, but with today's women, well beyond that.
She might care about their opinions, if they would stop prettle over their feelings, which should not be part of an argument.
@@ZeryuuThey will and have made it so for a long time.
Compassion doesn’t mean being “nice”
They hate it coming from another woman.
Because their "Well, you just don't get it because YOU are not a WOMAN." arguments don't work.
"...and they shall become one flesh..." indeed.
Thats very true, but they damn sure listen more when a woman is speaking with much less interruptions than when a man speaks.
Indees they get triggered 🤣
@@chickentwisties2298Why are whatever podcast girls on the opposite side of the table so dumb and immature especially OF girls? They get especially mad and triggered when another women does not agree with them; just like the debate where the woman destiny (Steven Bonnell 3rd) kept being rude to Lila Rose when she criticised Porn and commended pre-marital abstinence . 😂
"I don't think you're representing true Christian values very well" meaning, "shut up, I don't like your tone or what you're saying."
Ever notice the tone police are often tone deaf of themselves????
i thought tone didn’t matter
@@nicolehicks6555its called living up to your own standards, which most women have a major problem doing.
It doesn't, but calling out hypocrisy does.
Always. Projection is part of female nature. It can be annoying when you first notice it, but once you realize that they tell on themselves, its revealing.
@@daleford8621 Lol what does that even mean
Rachel says, AND I QUOTE" Tell that to the Amazon best sellers list...😂🎉
She's like her husband.
I love it
Same temper and hand sway gestures when talking
Can you imagine the two arguing? No prisoners! 😀
Her speech pattern is also fairly similar when she begins to formulate an idea.
She looks like him, same features, the eyes... She looks like she could be his sister... Sister wife? 🤢🤮
@@chanandlerbonggret*** detected opinion rejected
“Everyone’s a hall monitor,” had me gone 😂
Fake sisterhood > Tone policing > Feelings > Truth
It goes both ways. Men shouldn't be shamed for being men. Women shouldn't be shamed for being women. Women are more emotional, so they naturally are upset if somebody speaks to them with a negative tone. ☕😐
@@MrSuperPsymonYeah but there has to be a balance. Women are so afraid to hurt someone’s feelings they’ll cheer their friend on as they do something that will hurt them - cheering on an obese woman rather than saying “I’m worried about you”
And fake sisterhood is a tool of manipulative female psychopaths.
It’s both the carrot and the stick with which they control other women.
@@MrSuperPsymon Right and that means we should allow women to be unhinged lunatics because they feel bad. I think no one should be shamed into compensating for the women and instead be encouraged to speak the truth as loudly as need be as direct as possible. And we arrive at the exact same situation Rachel put forth, that is truth should not be tone policed and if you can't put your feelings aside and listen to it you are not ready to receive it, which is no one's problem but your own.
@@flerrin1754Why are you attracting unhinged lunatics? ☕😐
Rachel absolutely trashed the entire HR management team. Fucking hilarious.
LOL@ HR mgmt team.
Good grief, they won't just STFU for 20 seconds
Women ☕️
😂😂
There is a mute button.
They're only proving Rachel's point.
@annaburns2865 Not for reality, lol.
Delusions backed by feelings are dangerous.
Well said.
This is absolutely Andrews wife
Looks like a sister
@@mrwhat5094 I don’t even want to get into that bro. They look too much alike 😭
@@moayegbusi9623 haha
@@moayegbusi9623I thought it was his sister lmao
@@moayegbusi9623Bro, why does she look like she can pass as his sister tho?? It’s tripping me out.
"I don't tone police!"
>instantly tone polices
Good lord.
Who??
@@PhilominaSTambi-ko6yc girl in red
Funny how sisterhood goes out the fucking window when she meets a woman she disagrees with politically.
Sisterhood is only reserved for the real sisters that prioritize sisterhood over everything.
@@maatonneit’s reserved for the manipulators and the manipulated.
Anyone who crosses a manipulator gets banished.
When your ideology is BASED upon loyalty along demographic lines….. when someone who shares a demographic box with you but disagrees on a key ideology facet, it is simply easier to disqualify their shared demographic than engage in an argument of substance. Thus if a woman disagrees on a subject like abortion, she is not a true woman, if a black person disagrees on a race related subject like affirmative action , they are not truly black, a true hispanic cannot be in favor of regulating immigration, a true muslim cannot defend Israel’s right to exist, and a transgender or gay person cannot be on the “wrong” side of gender specific athletics or drag queen story time , or nambla
Sisterhood is only for other women that validate feminist delusions
@@MrSheckstr *"...when someone who shares a demographic box with you but disagrees on a key ideology facet, it is simply easier to disqualify their shared demographic..."*
Is that something like, "If you don't vote for me, you ain't blaque!"?
Compassion is correcting fallacy and delusion. Cruelty is allowing fallacy and delusion to persist.
Being compassionate is not about saying things nicely.
Well, what's the difference between right speech in Buddhism and saying things nicely?
@@ZoniZahiRoniZahi Buddhism is irrelevant.
@ZoniZahiRoniZahi dont know about Buddhism but "right speech" could just be saying what's true
The girl in red.
Run 🏃♂️ 🏃♂️ 🏃♂️
U will NEVER PLEASE HER !!!
Now that's a wife who's got her husband's back! Hell yeah!!!
Also his face.
Took her a couple husbands
Rachel is representing very well.
Which is compassionate, saying things that people “want” to hear, or saying things that people “need” to hear. These children need to grow up
FACTS 👍👍
Women prefer comfortable lies over unpleasant truths. This is why we can't let them into leadership positions.
@@MoneyIsSilverI hate these kind of over generalizations. Some women prefer truth and plenty of narcissistic men like comfortable lies. The real deciding factor seems to be how serious and knowledgable men or women are in the true Christian faith. Both Adam and Eve fell from grace. Fr. George Calciu, Romanian Orthodox Priest who spent a total of 28 years in Communist prison for his faith said that the Christian women imprisoned also being tortured for their faith generally were stronger and had more stamina and courage in their suffering than the men.
To a point the delivery does matter for Christians. "Speak the truth, in love." So we sometimes say harsh things, and we don't compromise the truth, but we do it in love. We speak truth for the other's good, but that also includes being hard when needed.
That's the problem though. The secular world has this false belief that if you are harsh while delivering the truth that it doesn't mean love. People don't understand discipline anymore
Rachel Wilson absolutely destroyed these women holy shit
Coddling is NOT compassion!
The woman saying she believes Rachel is controlled or brainwashed by her husband, his mouth piece. All while simultaneously spiraling into trying to manipulate Rachel with a false sisterhood and use of religion like a makeshift cultist is insanely ironic. The worst part is there is no chance she'll ever see it.
You're exactly right. That chick will never allow herself to see it.
Red is a mouth piece for the enemy of everything good.
It's a common defense. "You disagree with me, therefor that proves you're the brainwashed one".
@SicsemperevelloMortemtyr-by9hj The collective noun for those people will be censored, but it rhymes with, "shoes" and 6 million of them definitely did *not* die in the 1940s.
Christianity is basically a doomsday cult.
Rachel spitting facts make Red even more cross eyed. Shes fuming
Yeah she is struggling to cope. Supply is running dry
She is wrong about one thing. Men do tone police. If you come at a dude the wrong way, they will check you pretty quickly. We just don't play the victim. We become the aggressor. Normally it's in the form of, "Who do you think you're talking to like that?" or "You better watch your tone when you're talking to me." That's not a beta male thing. I can see how she would make that mistake because most men who require people to speak to them respectfully understand that speaking to someone disrespectfully is not acceptable, so they don't do it.
@@travisspaulding2222correct, and I think the point is that women don’t really offer the same consideration to each other and if they did perhaps delivery during adult discourse would be very different. Instead of talking over each other and deviating from the actual issue and when it’s obvious that they’re not getting what they want from the conversation (I’m right you’re wrong) it turns into you’re being a C-U- Next-Tuesday.
I looked up the definition of Compassion because the dark haired chick brought it up- here’s what was said: compassion implies pity coupled with an urgent desire to aid or to spare. Nothing about tone of voice. Lol 😂 because sometimes when you’re trying to spare someone from a bad outcome you literally have to shake them.
I’m not arguing or debating with you to be clear I’m just sharing as stuff comes up in the moment after having listened to the train wreck panel of women.
@@Supportfreespeech Yeah, I agree. I think another angle of it is men are more direct. If a man has an issue, most of the time, he will address right there. So the outcome will either be an amicable resolution, an argument, or a fight. Either way, when men speak, they know that the consequence for their words will be seen immediately. With women, typically speaking, they will go after a woman's reputation rather than addressing it directly. Of course, there are always exceptions to these rules.
@@travisspaulding2222 Being a woman, I like the direct approach which becomes more prevalent as we get older we care less about peer pressures. That can be interpreted as being abrasive or arrogant when really being direct is a sign of confidence. As opposed to beating around the bush which denotes being coy, underhanded or undecided.
Thank you for your time. I think it’s time we had a podcast of men and women who can talk to each other and show the world we can reach common ground. Instead of (repeat rinse) showing how people do not know how to get along.
The ultimate form Of compassion is TRUTH
Shes basically the female version of Andrew this is hilarious
It looks like Andrew with a wig.. She even has the same features as him.. Like a sibling would have... Sister wife? 🤢🤮
They are both annoying ... because they are AMERICAN CHRISTIANS who still live in medieval times. "Taking the bible literally" is BAD, because it is a book that was written 1600 years ago and TIMES HAVE CHANGED!
And let’s be honest…..it’s hot af 😂
@@miletello1🤨
@@Aishai26 is that supposed to indicate confusion? If so, what part of based woman being hot af do you not understand?
I also don't think Rachel is a mouthpiece for her husband but when you're already 45 and on your third husband, you will probably agree with everything he says and how he says it. 😬
Rachel is the ONLY Decent/sensible/based ONE there .. The rest .. Should go and dig some roads up and shut the front door
The lady with the black hair in the black shirt is also pretty based
@@dennisreelie1720no she isn't really look at this clip. She dismissed the evidence that single fathers are better parents or that fathers
She has a female bias. And the feminism is still in her
And she is completely utterly wrong about James bond that heracy. And historically ignorant of what was before bond .
That men were into or other movies..and television, books stories. Back to Greek mythology.
And calling people that disagree incels ( and it being a married man of 20 years ) as well as her interjections and trying to be funny.
Obviously she is way ahead of the others
Byt she is a load mouth former feminist attention seeking woman.
Anyone that says incel is automatically in the wrong. If the topic is no incels .
Women are always very brave at a distance.
She has an agenda and it's not the same as Rachel who is based
@@dennisreelie1720 the blond in blue was also more level headed...especially when you compared her to the loudmouth in red.
How is she sensible when she does nothing but shout?
And let's face it, a gentle, sweet woman doesn't yell, doesn't talk back in this way. To believe that she is like this ONLY with women and then suddenly loses it with her husband... that's a huge load of BS. If a person is argumentative, he/she is argumentative everywhere.
@@Lina-lq7jm I don't even know how to give a coherent response because the irony here is so funny.
It's like I'm sitting in a barn, surrounded by chickens
Andrew's at home watching this, having a smoke, drinking a beer and yelling 'Killshot' over and over!!
Rachel was using a flame thrower on the fems!!
Like of like scene in Aliens when Sigourney Weaver was torching all those alien eggs.
I am a retired man. When I was working, and I would say even today, I have a lot on my plate. It is enough that I take care of, or worry about, myself. There are 2 things I cannot and will not do. I cannot be responsible for how you feel, and I cannot be responsible for your choices. If I or someone else says something that hurts your feeling, that is up to you to deal with. It is not my problem. If you get offended, that is on you because that is your choice. A person chooses to be offended. Why anyone would give all of the people that they come into contact with, in person, walking down the street, on social media, on TV, in the government, whatever, this power over them to be able to make them feel this way. Your life is always going to be bad because you have too many people that you have given the power to influence how and what you feel.
Compassion doesn't mean what people think it means. Being an enabler is not compassionate. Its cruel,
Compassion does not mean you have no responsibility for accountability. It is not a free pass to do whatever you want.
The fact they all talk over each other constantly proves Rachel's point. Sadly the average woman doesn't really listen until they feel safe enough to do so.
😂😂😂
Actually, they are more likely to lie, scheme, manipulate, coerce, or threaten when they feel safe. A women who feels threatened will pick a man over a bear faster than she can pick a Chad over a um... imp?
If tone policing was a real crime, nothing would get done.
There was a time when women like Rachel Wilson were the majority.
I think it's the young generation that has been brainwashed.
@@Flmom15 the lure of pity to be gained playing victim is a powerful draw, enough to risk an empty existence 🤷.
There was a time when most male adults were men.
Now they're mostly boys.
Be better.
@@Flmom15They're not the only ones though. The last 3 generations of women dating back to the 1970s have all been brainwashed. That's why the newest version of feminism is called the "Third Wave".
@@Flmom15they are not the only ones though. They are just the latest generation to be infected with the feminist contagion. Four generations of women have gone through this toxic form of forced social engineering, hence the term "fourth wave feminism" being the most recent.
The definition of compassion gets so twisted. Being honest and firm is the best way to be compassionate to others.
Mrs. Wilson is great.
Not really….It is painful to watch the hypocrisy all round here.
I don’t think people win arguments with shouting matches and insults.
Rachel had all facts the other women was acting like a child insulting and tone policing.
You've no choice when you begin talking to them-and all you get is dumb airheads YELLING OVER AT YOU
The one brunette women is quoting Scripture out of context.
nobody preaches the bible harder than those who dont believe it.
Every one of her "arguments" were out of ft. She's an idiot.
She has no idea about what she speaks of.
She has no clue to Christianity.
Not only that, she's doesn't even know that Exodus 34 is a chapter and she neve gives what verse she's talking about. No one would ever quote scripture and only list the chapter, and not verse. She's acting like she knows the Bible but it's clear she got this from a meme.
Exactly
I do think Rachel failed to address the girl in red properly
She didn't say anything worth addressing, her whole tactic was to deflect and justify tone policing.
@@jerometruitt2731and mocking she’s a bird brain
compassion would be telling someone the truth even if they dont like it because it can save them
It always baffles me when the people that do not step foot into a church, read the Bible, or even practice Christianity in their life STILL have the nerve to question other people on their Christianity.
It always baffles me that grown adults believe in a magic sky man with a zombie son that walks on water and has wine for blood.
@@jayssongreenfield it always baffles me how atheists can’t stop talking about a person they don’t think exists, if you don’t think he’s real than just shut the f up, nobody cares about your opinion
@@jayssongreenfield No, you're baffled by very simple concepts 'cause you've described it completely wrong.
@@NikolaAvramovokay, so explain the talking snake and donkey, sounds like a fairytale to me….
@@SeorkMaxx It's very simple: you're a disciple of the Gnostic religion imposed onto education by Freemasonry.
They've just replaced the Christian worldview with their Aristotelian crap and imposed as a convention that somehow miracles aren't possible and that they don't come from God and that the entire universe is entirely governed by tangible laws of physics.
It's a religious creed.
And a wrong one that doesn't match reality.
Ask any Christian theologian and they'll explain to you that we're living in End Times noted for their absence of tangible and occasional miracles.
You, however, believe in a refurbished Buddist fairy tale in which the universe has no author and human beings are dust and it's all repetition on some unimaginable cosmic scale with a magical spirit by the name of Evolution going around creating species at random - but just so happens to not make a single new one since the beginning of written history.
She is I & I AM HER.. she is definitely a breath of fresh air and her mindset is top tier...Thank you for keeping it real & raw, Respectfully
Same 😂
@@Meg0307me three
Thank you for letting us know there are more than just one descent woman out here. 🙏 I’m not being sarcastic either. 😊
@@christopherbrubaker2070 😌
Compassion
"sympathetic pity and concern for the sufferings or misfortunes of others."
These women have no idea what that word actually means.
Being compassionate is to be truthful.
Think of an office with nothing but women. Now 1 man gets hired. Do the women have to change their behavior around that one man to make him feel comfortable? No. Now think of an office full of men. And 1 woman is hired. Do the men have to change their behavior to help the woman feel comfortable. Yes.
🎶Feeeelings!!! Nothing more than… Feelings!🎶
Trying to forget my, feelings of hate.
I like how Rachel completely disregarded the fact that they were saying her husband ia guilty of tone policing lol. Also, I don't think Rachel and her husband are great examples of orthodox Christians and I don't think they have a genuine faith.
“You’re A Pentecostal Heretic…” That had me dead😂😂😂
It was an amazing and hilarious way to close the clip!
Being lectured by heretics on how one is not meeting God's expectations is one of the funniest things ever.
When you say it in the Tone She wants - You get ignored, she doesn't take what's said serious !!!
They never shut up!
She can’t ask for an objective opinion when she’s being blatantly subjective.
This is a perfect example of women being combative and not listing to learn! just to respond and talk over people who they do not agree with !
Be honest with your friends. Delusion is incredibly destructive. I’m not even memeing, we really need to fix this.
She was dead on when she talked about her filtering that text in Exodus through her feelings and false idea of compassion.
There's absolutely no reason to think that compassion means soft tones or niceness in speech. It has to do with action.
show them logic, they will attempt to correct you by shaming you.
Exactly. Not interested in convincing women about anything
The SuperChat at the 1:27 second mark is awesome. 🤣🤣
Exodus 34 is *_an entire chapter_* . No one who honestly cites scripture to make a point cites an *_entire chapter_* without the verse. And the word "compassion" only appears in the _extremely_ dubious NIV, which added the word ex post facto without an attempt to point to a word the authors were translating from. Oh and, even in the NIV - which even agnostic scholars mostly dismiss as inauthentic - _the entire_ rest of the chapter makes *_the exact OPPOSITE_* point that she's trying to make, with the possible exception of the _two words_ she cites. I would love to hear her attempt to make this point to a proper biblical scholar who can cite chapter-and-verse off memory.
How the heck does Brian not go insane listening to these women?
I like watching his face to see his reactions.
He's in equilibrium mode
Someone has to get paid for it
The insults start flying the moment Racheal makes sense and shows them they are nothing on the inside. lol
5 bucks says they still wouldn't listen to her if she had a BeTtEr tone
That’s the deceit of the tone police.
They are lying when they say “I agree with what you said, but…”
They didn’t agree with what you said. They are using tone as an excuse not to argue against your point, because they don’t have an argument to make.
This is likely the case, but she still comes off looking bad and convincing no one with her aggressive tone and foul
language. She comes off as overcompensating to me. Unfortunate…
Tone policing has nothing to do with tone, ironically. She will never find the appropriate tone because there is none.
@@lornadoone8887 So your issue is her tone? Lol you've proved everyones point.
Shes picked up on Andrews tendencies
Yeah, she’s very masculine.
That redshirt chick used Exodus 34 as proof that God is only compassionate, here let me post it for you guys and you tell me if God is only about being nice and kind and polite.
Exodus 34:6 - 7
*And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The Lord, the Lord, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.”*
That's only one translation. The KJV doesn't use "compassionate." It uses "merciful." The passage is about forgiving those who repent, and punishing those who do not. It is NOT about compassion or love. After all, God chastens [punishes] those He loves. His love is not in question. It's whether He'll put up with people's awfulness.
that is exactly why the bible is a crock of shit it is full of contradictions and yet God created evil and also created man to be sinners then blames them for doing so, then left no tangible evidence of is existence, also had to committed mass murder with a flood for his own creation, it is akin to putting a loaded gun on the table then telling your child not touch it then blaming the child for picking it up and shooting mom. they are all delusional and the world his paying for this now. men through thousands of years created civilization tamed there barbaris nature and cherished women with all their heart, unfortunately they were put on a pedestal so high they forgot how a partnership works and have abandoned what was good a loving relationship between to people with a common cause to raise and nurture a family, they did this because women what it all cherry pick with no responsibility for bad choices. this generation will reap what it has sown.
@@theevermind going with your or the first one here... nither one has anything to do with the "compassion" red shirt was trying to slap Rachel with to try and make her bend the knee
THIS IS THE REASON WHY WOMEN ARE NOT TO TEACH OR LEAD MEN in Scripture... THERE womenize FILTER (EMOTIONS) screws EVERYTHING UP SO THINGS ARE wrong OR A lie.
Isn’t he also a “ jealous” god too?
You know him saying
“ thou shall not worship any other God before me ,for I am a jealous God”
Rachel is so based. We love her.
She's eating their lunch.
Find me a verse that says I have to be a doormat.
Love honor and obey , there are several examples, but doormat doesn't mean doormat, they quoted the scripture in this , ( an example)
"I am a god of compassion..."
Also, "Leave nothing alive when you take the land."
Real Christianity ain't about "nice."
Hyperbole. After God says to “leave nothing alive when you take the land,” a few verses later he says not to intermarry the women there. If they were already going to be completely annihilated, why would he feel the need to specify that? Christians who read their Bible and do their homework know the context that so many non-believers seem to ignore. To give a modern example, if two teams are playing a sporting match against each other and one team is “annihilated” the meaning isn’t their team is wiped out. It means they lost badly in the game. Hyperbole. Of course, there are instances where God demands justice and punished evil nations like the Canaanites (who literally sacrificed their own children to ancient Canaanite gods), but justice isn’t about “niceness” it’s about retribution and harmony.
That's why he created the rainbow. It's to mock us, and say that the next time he wipes us out, he's not going to be as kind and gentle as nicely drowning us.
Her compassion is shown by her telling the truth. It's not compassionate to watch someone make themselves miserable and not try to help them out of fear of not being perceived as 'nice'.
The truth doesn't care about your feelings
Sad that Rachel did not have an answer for the where woman are better. Because there is one big area where they are better.
They are better at perception, especially if it comes to non moving objects and social situations.
Like when you visit a flee marked, the woman might spot what the couple it looking for much faster and earlier than the man would do.
Look at the face of the one in red. WOW. She was fuming. LOL .Rachel defeated every single one of those haters, spitting facts & logic. Awesome.
Compassion is not the same as kindness. If I'm telling someone something they don't like but is helpful to them is compassion without worrying about being kind.
the weakness she pointed out on men and heir simping tendancy was spot on too
who is this woman
LOL. I love how Rachel is down-to-earth, reasonable, and very objective in the way she thinks and talks. Keep up the great work!
Never try to understand. Women understand other women, and they hate each other.
Honestly don't think they understand men either
Of course women don’t understand men, I hope this is nowhere near a new realization for you
Wisdom from the great AL BUNDY!!! I see what you did there!
@@mrwhat5094 It was an Al Bundy quote, possibly from before your time.
No, they dont understand men generally, they are too neurotic and overthinking to get it
Christianity is grace and she definitely lacks that..
Personal attacks and emotional appeals from ego, not one single refutation. This is why you don't argue with emotional people, you can never win.
I wish I had heard her as a young lady. I was pushed to focus on school, sports, and being an "independent" woman... I am grateful I ended up meeting my lovely husband at 22 & still happily together with children... and as someone who had kids late in life, had fertility problems, & am now realizing my husband and I started to have children way late in life... the true saying of "If I knew then, what I know now" .... smh.
I love it. "I'm an older woman and I'm here to tell you you're all full of shit." Andrew is sitting there watching, at home, smoking, proudly smiling.
I agree except the amount of time Andrew spends on this show I would be shocked if he ever watches this show when he is not on…
Tone-policing is typically used as an attempt to deflect a true proposition by trying to kick aside the content through a manipulative focusing of attention on "manner". The correct response to tone deflection is "Imagine me telling you the same in whatever tone you want - now respond to the content and not to the form". This always dismantels the manipulation and the discussion can progress.Tone-policing is typically used as an attempt to deflect a true proposition by trying to kick aside the content through a manipulative focusing of attention on "manner". The correct response to tone deflection is "Imagine me telling you the same in whatever tone you want - now respond to the content and not to the form". This always dismantels the manipulation and the discussion can progress.
The woman in red is being nasty to Rachel for not being compassionate. A bubbling pot of hate.
The reasons she is, it's becuz Rach called Red out earlier in this episode becuz Red is a Christian protestant..and they disagree philosophically cuz Rach has a different philosophy. And Red caught feelings becuz of tha, so she was slinging mud at Rach becuz of it...😂😂😂
If I'm a Beta Then I'm MasterBeta😂😂😂
Tone = straight facts
I think it is important that message is transmitted in a way that the person receiving it can absorb and understand without being outright attacked; usually I like to say "the way a message is transmitted is almost as important as the message itself"
A boss telling you "you need to do better, improve on x and y" and saying "you're horrible at your work and should either get better or quit" are basically transmitting the same message: "you're not up to standards and need to improve, otherwise find another job", but the first one will more likely motivate people, while the second one will just put them down further (especially after a mistake)
I have no idea how the one man there didn't jump out the window with that many cackling hens in one room.
Good ear plugs perhaps 😅
When they can’t attack your argument, they attack you!
Her perception of God of compassion is perceived as God of permissiveness.
It's not even what the scripture she cited says. Ex 34 says God is *MERCIFUL.* It does not say compassionate. In the same paragraph it says God will punish those who don't repent (meaning, they change their feelings) so much that their great-grandchildren will suffer.
Also, this is the same God who two chapters earlier commanded Moses to have rebellious Israelites killed over their wickedness with the golden calf.
God cares about your feelings in that He wants people to be happy. But He does NOT care about your feelings insofar as your feelings cause you do deviate from His will. Because happiness comes from aligning your will with His.
*And He will F up your feelings until you change your mind and align your feelings to Him.*
I think they forget Jesus whipped and beat people out of the Temple because of their disrespect for the Holiness of the ground they were on. That he told his apostles to break the law and purchase swords for self defense. He did get mad because they used the swords but because it wasn’t the right time. As was said He is a compassionate God. If you try to follow him and his laws. If you willing break his laws well he will turn from you in the end.
"lack of Christlikeness"
actually, she's very Christlike
Christ was literally crucified for standing for the truth
clearly He didn't put fEeLiNgS above the truth
Notice, though, that he willfully submitted to his crucifixion. He took insults, mockery, and shame without retaliation. It's true that he spoke truth and was crucified for it, but we should pay careful to attention to how he went about it. He didn't insult in return; he didn't hold his tormentors in contempt. He asked God to forgive them. He blessed those who cursed him.
When someone gets on about a "lack of Christlikeness," what they mean is that the other person comes off as a jerk. And there's really no scriptural basis for being a jerk. It's not a fruit of the Spirit. I know there's a whole rhetorical thing now about truth v. feelings, and I get it, but Christians should take the notion of Christlikeness seriously enough not to subject it to the banal platitudes of today's discourse.
@@nathanmarone I hear you, even in the "he who has not sinned may cast the first stone" situation, Jesus qualified to cast the first stone since He never sinned but He didn't throw it and we tend to leave that part out.
He did, however, tell her to go and sin no more so we can't leave that part out either
we are not called to condemn people but we should correct them, and correction requires initial judgement (so does condemnation)...
reason I bring this whole thing up is because when you're on the recieving end of correction, you mistake it for condemnation since you are being judged...
Jesus did look like a jerk when He tossed out those merchants from the temple... being a jerk isn't a problem here, it's really just the merchants disrespecting the temple and being mad about being held accountable
@@nathanmarone also remember that they were always plotting to take Him but they never could because it wasn't His time
Christ also said women were equal to men and hanged around prostitutes and outcasts.
Show me in the Gospels where Christ addressed sin and falsehood by unhinged shouting over people and by using profanity. Rachel shouted over others, too. The only people who think she won this…um…”debate” are those in her camp. I, too, despise modern “Woke” feminism, but this does not seem productive, frankly.
It may score plenty of views, but keeps the divisiveness & acrimony going and changes no minds because they are all made up. I’ve seen better ways to expose flaws in feminist ideology and advocate for traditional values and dignity of both men and women.
Which sex of Christ’s followers was better represented at the foot of the Cross when most of His disciples had fled for their lives?…
I'm a dude, tone matters
Speaking truth is good, but we can choose to speak it harshly or in love
Yeah it’s hard as a man not to put a “tone” onto things, especially when correcting someone when they’re doing something wrong. It would be so amazing to have a conversation with Christ to just see that sort of perfect poise and tone coming from him. To be a fly on the wall when he had his conversation with his disciples… the only guy to be perfect with everything.
She mimics her husband well. The other women do have a point about effectiveness and "tone". However, I think they're forgetting that there's a time and place for everything, and sometimes being brash and unapologetic is called for. It's a tough balance to achieve, for sure.
You'd be surprised how much more effective she became if they agreed with what she said in the same tone. Don't be lukewarm on this. The truth is the truth no matter how its delivered. From a kid, a criminal, a raging housewife, a pastor, it doesn't matter.
It's a way to control and shutdown arguments through invalidation, it's manipulative and they are liars who don't want the truth is what it boils down to