How have I been a Christian for so many years-- read the catechism, heard countless sermons-- and not known that for all our losses or suffering God will give us a greater good. W😮W!
You are not a Christian, you are Catholic. You read the Catechism? Have you ever read Catechism 978? The water Baptism that you received didn't deliver you: "Yet the grace of Baptism delivers no one from all the weakness of nature" - i.e. sin. Water Baptism "delivers no one" from their sins. And since it "delivers no one," Catholics have to go to a sinner (a priest) in order to be "reconciled with God and with the Church." Penance, like Baptism (even though it "delivers no one") is "necessary for salvation."(980) Only faith in Jesus Christ alone will save you from your sins. Read what Peter, the so-called first Pope, said about "the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth"(v.10): "This is the ‘stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.’ Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" - Acts 4:11-12 "...there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" 1. The Catholic Church ("name under heaven") - Catechism 846 2. Water Baptism ("name under heaven") - Catechism 980 3. Penance ("name under heaven") - Catechism 980 Catechism 846&980 says that numbers 1,2&3 are "necessary for salvation" but Peter said there isn't "salvation in any other." Jesus Christ speaking: "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
I have seen blood on the eucharist when the priest was holding it and I have tasted what appeared to be blood when eating it. Is my mind playing tricks on me? I was in awe.
If it wasn’t visible to others then it may have been an instance of private revelation, God showing to you that the Eucharist is truly God. Maybe He sensed some doubts you had or He sensed your strength to spread his message. When you see something that’s true your eyes aren’t playing tricks on you :)
U are full of UN clean Demons , repent only go by the gospel of Christ! Anything else is false teaching. Don't pray to Mary !!! It's not in the word of GOD. Come out of her my people.💯🇺🇸😭
At the 9:00 min mark you described something that I’ve been to afraid until now to ask about. I know of someone, a convert from cradle Evangelicalism, whom this has happened with more than once - being uncontrollably reduced to tears both times.
I still contend the jab was a “type” of the mark in so far as many people lost their job, couldn’t participate in sections of society and in the case of the Canadian truckers, had their bank accounts frozen for not participating in the great social experiment.
It's not what goes into your body and is expelled according to scripture. It's what you've accepted into your heart. This being said, there are a lot of emotionally manipulative and destructive things that the jab represents. Governments have earned a reckoning.
Re: the issue of consuming blood mentioned from 8:10 - 8:27 Didn't the Council of Jerusalem hold that gentile believers should join Jewish believers in the prohibition on consuming blood? (specifically Acts 15:19-20)
Hi, hope this helps? The Church Reveals the Answer: We’ve already seen that it's not possible to avoid eating blood, since some always remains in the meat. We’ve seen that the basis of the blood prohibition involves symbolism and is linked to Jewish sacrificial ritual that has passed away. And we’ve seen that Jesus articulated a principle that would result in all foods being clean, apparently including the ancient ones made with blood. If these are not enough, however, there is the practice of the Church down through the centuries. Blood has been eaten in many Christian lands for the last twenty centuries, without the Church prohibiting this practice. If God guides the Church, as he does, then we can look to this to settle the matter. Thus the Pontifical Biblical Commission noted in 2008: The other example is more delicate: ‘You must not eat any fat or any blood.’ (Leviticus 3:17; 7:26; Deuteronomy 12:23-24); the New Testament takes up this prohibition unrestrictedly, to the point of imposing it upon Christians coming from paganism (Acts 15:29; 21:25). From the viewpoint of exegesis the explicit reason for this prohibition is not exactly theological, it rather reflects a symbolical representation: “the life (nepheš) of all flesh is in the blood” (Leviticus 17:11, 14; Deuteronomy 12:23). After the apostolic era the Church did not feel obliged to make this a basis for formulating precise rules for the butcher and the kitchen, and still less in our own times to prohibit blood transfusion. The trans-cultural value underlying the particular decision of the Church in Acts 15 was a desire to foster the harmonious integration of the various groups, albeit at the price of a provisional compromise.
Mr. Akin, I'm not sure if it affects or changes anything about the response on eucharistic miracle where the host turns into flesh, but is the red liquid confirmed to be blood or is it myoglobin as what we see 'bleeding' from a steak meat, for example?
I love all that you do. However, when you label something would you mind also making that question just that question because I don’t have 55 minutes to listen to everything in order to hear that answer. Perhaps in the title put the time stamp. I like watching shorter videos that are what they are labeled. ;)
In order to make chapters, the uploader has to put time stamps in the description, so you can go there and see the timestamps and click on it to go straight where you want to go.
@@marteld2108you're replying to someone else's question about a hat. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say the fault is with your substandard interwebs skills
On the topic of 666 the mark of the beast, I read somewhere that it simply refers to man. God is holy, holy, holy and man was created on the sixth day. Man is 666. I cannot remember what catholic priest I heard say this. I wish I would have bookmarked the video. He explains it further.
@@krissmork If the Greek spelling of Nero Caesar (Neron Kaisar) is transliterated into Hebrew (nrwn qsr), the numerical equivalent is 666. If the Latin (rather than the Greek) spelling "Nero Caesar" is transliterated into Hebrew (nrw qsr), the final "n" in Neron being omitted (and its corresponding value of 50), the name computes as 616, which is the number indicated in the oldest surviving copy of the New Testament
The mark of the beast was the money that was used to buy stuff back in the time of the Roman empire. The coins had ceasars inscription on them just like in the uk the coins have the queen's inscription on them. Ceasar was the beast and his mark was the drachma currency.
How have I been a Christian for so many years-- read the catechism, heard countless sermons-- and not known that for all our losses or suffering God will give us a greater good. W😮W!
You are not a Christian, you are Catholic. You read the Catechism?
Have you ever read Catechism 978? The water Baptism that you received didn't deliver you:
"Yet the grace of Baptism delivers no one from all the weakness of nature" - i.e. sin.
Water Baptism "delivers no one" from their sins. And since it "delivers no one," Catholics have to go to a sinner (a priest) in order to be "reconciled with God and with the Church." Penance, like Baptism (even though it "delivers no one") is "necessary for salvation."(980)
Only faith in Jesus Christ alone will save you from your sins. Read what Peter, the so-called first Pope, said about "the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth"(v.10):
"This is the ‘stone which was rejected by you builders, which has become the chief cornerstone.’ Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" - Acts 4:11-12
"...there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved"
1. The Catholic Church ("name under heaven") - Catechism 846
2. Water Baptism ("name under heaven") - Catechism 980
3. Penance ("name under heaven") - Catechism 980
Catechism 846&980 says that numbers 1,2&3 are "necessary for salvation" but Peter said there isn't "salvation in any other."
Jesus Christ speaking: "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" - John 14:6
I have seen blood on the eucharist when the priest was holding it and I have tasted what appeared to be blood when eating it. Is my mind playing tricks on me? I was in awe.
I also saw what I believe to be blood on the Eucharist when I received it from a priest
If it wasn’t visible to others then it may have been an instance of private revelation, God showing to you that the Eucharist is truly God. Maybe He sensed some doubts you had or He sensed your strength to spread his message. When you see something that’s true your eyes aren’t playing tricks on you :)
I have seen this as well. A few times. When the priest held up the eucharist and says “Behold the Lamb of God”. I feel so blessed to have seen this.
U are full of UN clean Demons , repent only go by the gospel of Christ! Anything else is false teaching. Don't pray to Mary !!! It's not in the word of GOD. Come out of her my people.💯🇺🇸😭
❤ From 🇭🇷❤️✝️
Pozdrav😄
Hvaljen Isus I Marija!
@@gangawerks Navijeke!
God Bless Jimmy Akin
Nice that you listed the location of the Title Question. Something I have not seen before, and it is really respectful of the audience.
I try to be considerate of others, and I do this now whenever I have timecodes. ☺
God bless you Mr. Akin
Mr. Akin , you are a treasure and a blessing. Thank you so much!
On apostolic succession there is a video from UsefulCharts titled _How All Modern Popes Share a Common "Ancestor"_ you might find interesting.
Thanks! I’ll definitely have to check that one out.
At the 9:00 min mark you described something that I’ve been to afraid until now to ask about.
I know of someone, a convert from cradle Evangelicalism, whom this has happened with more than once - being uncontrollably reduced to tears both times.
Doing the Jimmy Akin thing: Liking, Commenting, and Subscribed!
Subscribed... Liked... Comment 😊 May God bless you 🙏🏻✝️
Thanks for what you do, jim. Keep it up.
Love the way Jimmy explains all things Catholic!
Very informative - thank you!
TY!
It could be.
I still contend the jab was a “type” of the mark in so far as many people lost their job, couldn’t participate in sections of society and in the case of the Canadian truckers, had their bank accounts frozen for not participating in the great social experiment.
It's not what goes into your body and is expelled according to scripture. It's what you've accepted into your heart.
This being said, there are a lot of emotionally manipulative and destructive things that the jab represents. Governments have earned a reckoning.
Re: the issue of consuming blood mentioned from 8:10 - 8:27
Didn't the Council of Jerusalem hold that gentile believers should join Jewish believers in the prohibition on consuming blood?
(specifically Acts 15:19-20)
Hi, hope this helps? The Church Reveals the Answer:
We’ve already seen that it's not possible to avoid eating blood, since some always remains in the meat.
We’ve seen that the basis of the blood prohibition involves symbolism and is linked to Jewish sacrificial ritual that has passed away.
And we’ve seen that Jesus articulated a principle that would result in all foods being clean, apparently including the ancient ones made with blood.
If these are not enough, however, there is the practice of the Church down through the centuries.
Blood has been eaten in many Christian lands for the last twenty centuries, without the Church prohibiting this practice.
If God guides the Church, as he does, then we can look to this to settle the matter.
Thus the Pontifical Biblical Commission noted in 2008:
The other example is more delicate: ‘You must not eat any fat or any blood.’ (Leviticus 3:17; 7:26; Deuteronomy 12:23-24); the New Testament takes up this prohibition unrestrictedly, to the point of imposing it upon Christians coming from paganism (Acts 15:29; 21:25).
From the viewpoint of exegesis the explicit reason for this prohibition is not exactly theological, it rather reflects a symbolical representation: “the life (nepheš) of all flesh is in the blood” (Leviticus 17:11, 14; Deuteronomy 12:23).
After the apostolic era the Church did not feel obliged to make this a basis for formulating precise rules for the butcher and the kitchen, and still less in our own times to prohibit blood transfusion.
The trans-cultural value underlying the particular decision of the Church in Acts 15 was a desire to foster the harmonious integration of the various groups, albeit at the price of a provisional compromise.
Im sitting here listening to Jimmy talk about the mark of the beast, while realizing that I am video like number 666.
Mr. Akin, I'm not sure if it affects or changes anything about the response on eucharistic miracle where the host turns into flesh, but is the red liquid confirmed to be blood or is it myoglobin as what we see 'bleeding' from a steak meat, for example?
The Beast is the corporatisation of civilisation.
I'm not in New York, I'm in Oklahoma.
🙏🙏🙏🌟
I love all that you do. However, when you label something would you mind also making that question just that question because I don’t have 55 minutes to listen to everything in order to hear that answer. Perhaps in the title put the time stamp. I like watching shorter videos that are what they are labeled. ;)
In order to make chapters, the uploader has to put time stamps in the description, so you can go there and see the timestamps and click on it to go straight where you want to go.
Celibacy is also for those with sexual lust for those of the same sex. Correct?
You're conflating celibacy with continuance. Celibacy is remaining unmarried.
That would be chastity according to one’s station in life.
Please buy normal mic 🎤. The sound is very bad.
Hi Jimmy where did you get your hat?
At a local western wear store. Any western wear store would have them. 🙂
@@JimmyAkinI am a Catholic and sent you some emails in the past through your site. You never reply.
@@marteld2108you're replying to someone else's question about a hat. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say the fault is with your substandard interwebs skills
@@davewilson6313 I replied to Jimmy’s reply. Mind your own business and learn to be cordial.
@@davewilson6313 Mind your own business clown. You're clueless.
so who are the two witnesses then. if it happened in the past
It was the spirit of Moses and Elijah who was in a man named Jesus, son of Ananias. Josephus wrote about him.
666 means imperfection.
Cy looks like he's been on that GTL. Am I crazy, or did he lose some weight?
Love ya, bye! 😂😂😂
I know that put a smile on my face😊
The answer is no
The mark of the beast is A RED HAT
On the topic of 666 the mark of the beast, I read somewhere that it simply refers to man. God is holy, holy, holy and man was created on the sixth day. Man is 666. I cannot remember what catholic priest I heard say this. I wish I would have bookmarked the video. He explains it further.
ive also heard that the number can be alternatively translated as 616, the number for emperor Nero or something like that
@@krissmork If the Greek spelling of Nero Caesar (Neron Kaisar) is transliterated into Hebrew (nrwn qsr), the numerical equivalent is 666. If the Latin (rather than the Greek) spelling "Nero Caesar" is transliterated into Hebrew (nrw qsr), the final "n" in Neron being omitted (and its corresponding value of 50), the name computes as 616, which is the number indicated in the oldest surviving copy of the New Testament
@@nbarnett31 You have the deets!
The mark of the beast was the money that was used to buy stuff back in the time of the Roman empire. The coins had ceasars inscription on them just like in the uk the coins have the queen's inscription on them. Ceasar was the beast and his mark was the drachma currency.