would'nt the best way to make effective boards is to only have people there who own a large percetage of the stock? Exclude the passive holders like Blackrock and Vanguard?
Board members are almost always required to hold stock in the company. Requiring them to hold a “large percentage” of the stock is not necessary, so long as they are incentivized to act in the best interest of the shareholders. Additionally, you have to consider the downsides. If the requirement is for them to hold a “large percentage” of the stock, then you have two options: concentrating power into the hands of a few very high NW individuals or institutional investors, or issuing large volume of shares to your selected board members, which would have a dilutive effect on the remaining shareholders.
@@kristinn3367 look at the berkshire board. Heavy onwership. Incentivizes them to protect their wealth. Most board members in other companies hold miniscule amount of company stock compared to their NW or even board fees.
And who would look after the interest of minority shareholders And Blackrock and all other active investment group wants representation on board They wont even invest in your company if you dont hand them a board seat
Professor, those guys wants that you do a case of Harvard like for to reflexion about valuetion of companies. Right now that is touching this theme of valuetion of company and his diferents methods.
I noticed a quote by Sir that said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again." It gives me serious chills. 🥵 did he copied that dialog from vaas . can;t anything sir could be a far cry 3 fan .
Actually, I refute this. No chills. Sorry. We all do every necessary same things over and over to maintain homeostasis. The stuff should be harmful to make me look insane.
It would be interesting to know Professors' view on Apple vs Spotify/Fortnite saga from lens of maximising shareholder value over long term. Has Apple by effectively bypassing EU regulations decreased value of future cashflows by inviting stringent regulations and reduced support from App ecosystem (Vision Pro)?
This is really annoying, I want to watch anime on my day off but Damodaran is so compelling
Study Material & post-test solution Link showcasing error, Please provide a new link!!!
would'nt the best way to make effective boards is to only have people there who own a large percetage of the stock? Exclude the passive holders like Blackrock and Vanguard?
Board members are almost always required to hold stock in the company. Requiring them to hold a “large percentage” of the stock is not necessary, so long as they are incentivized to act in the best interest of the shareholders. Additionally, you have to consider the downsides. If the requirement is for them to hold a “large percentage” of the stock, then you have two options: concentrating power into the hands of a few very high NW individuals or institutional investors, or issuing large volume of shares to your selected board members, which would have a dilutive effect on the remaining shareholders.
@@kristinn3367 look at the berkshire board. Heavy onwership. Incentivizes them to protect their wealth. Most board members in other companies hold miniscule amount of company stock compared to their NW or even board fees.
And who would look after the interest of minority shareholders
And Blackrock and all other active investment group wants representation on board
They wont even invest in your company if you dont hand them a board seat
Professor, those guys wants that you do a case of Harvard like for to reflexion about valuetion of companies.
Right now that is touching this theme of valuetion of company and his diferents methods.
Thank You
I noticed a quote by Sir that said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again." It gives me serious chills.
🥵 did he copied that dialog from vaas . can;t anything sir could be a far cry 3 fan .
That's a very famous quote usually attributed to Albert Einstein
Actually, I refute this. No chills. Sorry.
We all do every necessary same things over and over to maintain homeostasis.
The stuff should be harmful to make me look insane.
It would be interesting to know Professors' view on Apple vs Spotify/Fortnite saga from lens of maximising shareholder value over long term.
Has Apple by effectively bypassing EU regulations decreased value of future cashflows by inviting stringent regulations and reduced support from App ecosystem (Vision Pro)?
Why aren’t sessions in chronological sequence? Why is session 3 published before session 2 and why are there three session 1?
Different courses
Three Courses going on.
1. Valuation - MBA
2. Valuation - UG
3. Corporate Finance - MBA
use the playlists, he posts 3 different course
28:27
Pending