The Most Terrifying Theory Scientists Don’t Even Want To Talk About

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
  • To play the Chaos Game
    www.geogebra.o...
    I set the number of points to be 3, clicked start, and set the speed to ‘fast’.
    The key takeaway of chaos is this: even when your equations are perfectly deterministic, you cannot know the initial conditions of arbitrary sensitivities.
    When the present determines the future, but, the approximate present does not approximately determine the future, is “Chaos”.

Комментарии • 1,6 тыс.

  • @scottrettig5608
    @scottrettig5608 6 месяцев назад +466

    if a flap of a butterflies wing could cause a tornado somewhere else in the world, i now suddenly feel bad for every time i have ever farted.

  • @fumomofumosarum5893
    @fumomofumosarum5893 6 месяцев назад +84

    Flexl: " Looks familiar, right? "
    Me: " The Triforce, from Legend of Zelda! "
    Flexl: " It is indeed the sierpinski triangle. "
    Me: " Aw... dammit... "

  • @klaushubbertz7009
    @klaushubbertz7009 5 месяцев назад +181

    Chaos is just an euphemistic term for man's extremely restricted ability to grasp infinity ...

    • @louiscolborn6715
      @louiscolborn6715 4 месяца назад +6

      You are infinitely correct 🤔

    • @youbetyourwrasse
      @youbetyourwrasse 4 месяца назад +7

      @@louiscolborn6715 NO. but nice word play fun have.

    • @sleepyinterface8819
      @sleepyinterface8819 4 месяца назад +6

      Totally agree! The seasons, days, months, they're all cyclic. We think the universe is also cyclic

    • @klaushubbertz7009
      @klaushubbertz7009 4 месяца назад +3

      @@sleepyinterface8819 BINGO!! Yesterday the Big Bang, tomorrow afternoon the Big Crunch, rinse, repeat ... and humans are still fighting about "ideas" ...🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @johnphelps7519
      @johnphelps7519 4 месяца назад +2

      Expect next you'll claim we exist only in some computer program.

  • @WitchidWitchid
    @WitchidWitchid 6 месяцев назад +126

    Scientists may not want to talk about it. But Mathematicians are more than glad to talk about it. 😃

    • @Rafiki9112
      @Rafiki9112 6 месяцев назад +2

      No, they're not.. at what exact altitude does the horizon stop being horizontal...🌅🦧🎈🌛🤙

    • @Hankinit9
      @Hankinit9 6 месяцев назад +1

      The study of large numbers

    • @crysstoll1191
      @crysstoll1191 4 месяца назад +2

      Engineers, too. Love the stuff.

    • @louiscolborn6715
      @louiscolborn6715 4 месяца назад +3

      That adds up 😂

    • @louiscolborn6715
      @louiscolborn6715 4 месяца назад +1

      ​@@Rafiki9112it's never horizontal, it's horizon-taly, as in almost-ish horizontal, ✨🤨😆

  • @OneBriteStar
    @OneBriteStar 7 месяцев назад +264

    Unpredictability does not imply randomness. Notice that chaos theory only works where there is a pre-established set of rules, and those rules are determined by a conscious observer.

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад +32

      We do not know the rules. We are currently trying to figure them out by observation but it seems not everything can be observed and not everything can be observed objectively.

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад +28

      There does not have to be a conscious observer.

    • @ConnoisseurOfExistence
      @ConnoisseurOfExistence 7 месяцев назад +17

      Laws of nature aren't determined or dependent on conscious observer.

    • @boblydecker5951
      @boblydecker5951 6 месяцев назад

      The “Laws of Nature” are EXCLUSIVELY the observations of humans. I believe that the entire Universe is Schrodinger’s Box; All possibilities existing simultaneously, in a state of infinite potentialities, until the very moment it’s observed. It is IMPOSSIBLE to remove the observer from an experiment.

    • @jacobbeaudoin4237
      @jacobbeaudoin4237 6 месяцев назад +38

      The double split experiment and that other new one that came out recently using helium atoms proves light travels as a wave or particle until a conscious observer watches. It makes no sense I don't understand physics that well but I do know when they don't use a camera to observe the single light particle they shoot it goes through both slits creating a dissonance pattern and when it is observed it creates a single line meaning that conscious observers have an effect on the way light chooses to act. Interestingly enough it kind of confirms some of what the buddhist believe, that reality is generated from within and are thoughts, desires, and expectations have and effect on the world. That doesn't mean things we have no control over don't happen. It just means we always have the choice to choose how we personally react to everything and what we choose to attach ourselves to and what to ignore. A lot of people's reactions are formed by their parents friends family. Monkey see monkey do. Most people don't usually take the time to sit back and wonder why they react to the world the way they do. Got carried away I'm stoned. Reality may or may not be what any of us expect. It could all just be an illusion formed by our perceptions and state of mind. I mean every animal bug plant expirence a different version of reality whose to say ours is the ultimate true one. It's all subjective which is where Einstein comes in with his theory of relativity. Food for thought

  • @10thdim
    @10thdim 7 месяцев назад +22

    What a nice summation of chaos theory! Love it. I believe it’s easier to envision all this when we remember that our reality is defined not in linear/causal 4D spacetime, but in the five dimensions of the quantum wavefunction.

    • @charlesmiller8107
      @charlesmiller8107 7 месяцев назад +1

      5D quantum wavefunction? A quantum process can be described in any number of dimensions depending on the object or process under observation.

    • @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r
      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r 7 месяцев назад

      Smart but agree there is no 'the' 5 Dimensions friend, fractal dimensions would surely go on toward infinity or to a return point possibly, until it all collapses back to fold into one

    • @10thdim
      @10thdim 7 месяцев назад +2

      The quantum wavefunction is calculated in what Hawking called “imaginary time, at right angles to spacetime”. Everett said his Many Worlds exist within “a subspace orthogonal to spacetime”. Kip Thorne describes the “multiple branching 4D world tubes bending in the warped geometries of the tesseract” that a hypothetical 5D observer would see. The additional degree of freedom afforded by the fifth dimension allows for the probabilistic forms of chaos and causality that Schrödinger was envisioning when he said “I insist upon the view that all is waves”.

    • @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r
      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r 7 месяцев назад +4

      They are powerful theories. I don't feel the 5th dimension would 'see' the other dimensions unless it had a method of analysis, like we try to understand the quantum level, but it may be a realm experiencing more freedom. I agree with the warping within a tesseract but my knowledge of geometry and division denotes no end to the dimensions... Like 11th is highest... How exactly? Anyway we belong to a race that utilises nuclear energy for warfare so we don't deserve to know the 'secrets' of the Universe. We can't even be civil to each other.

  • @Trottelheimer
    @Trottelheimer 6 месяцев назад +267

    Click bait title - not watching this one.

    • @Allyourheroswenttohell
      @Allyourheroswenttohell 6 месяцев назад +14

      You should. I've always believed this. I never knew it had a name. It just made sense to me.

    • @Allyourheroswenttohell
      @Allyourheroswenttohell 6 месяцев назад +14

      Free will is imaginary.

    • @Private-wj4nd
      @Private-wj4nd 6 месяцев назад +11

      Why? It’s really interesting! ❤

    • @dee_w784
      @dee_w784 6 месяцев назад +9

      Despite the clickbait title it is very good

    • @ianyeager2893
      @ianyeager2893 6 месяцев назад +15

      Exciting visual stimuli coupled with vocal delivery suggesting a tense suspense yarn almost make me fail to notice extremely poor logical continuity and flow. After seven minutes plus I've little idea what it's about. I think it's cotton candy crap, electronic monosodium glutamate, possibly composed by nonhuman. Kindly refund my wasted time

  • @mactabilis6039
    @mactabilis6039 7 месяцев назад +36

    "irregularity is a charecteristic property" isn't irregularity a measure of the complexity of an "algebraic surface" while charecteristic property refer to identification and classification system, particularly substances. my mind is blown btw, thanks OP! great work!

    • @david_cop_a_feel7538
      @david_cop_a_feel7538 6 месяцев назад +2

      When people use quotation marks, it is imperative that what is between the marks is exact. Otherwise you could be accused of twisting a person's words or trying to manipulate the audience with lies.

  • @Mercurio-Morat-Goes-Bughunting
    @Mercurio-Morat-Goes-Bughunting 6 месяцев назад +68

    The butterfly effect is when some egomaniacal primate singles out one butterfly among 28 billion buterflies, all flapping their wings at the same time in Brazil, and saying that this particular butterfly is to blame for a dust-devil in Australia 127 years, 6 months, 3 days, 12 hours 38 minutes and 12.9567831427 seconds later...as opposed to any other butterfly which flapped it's wings in that moment in time. The Butterfly Effect is confirmation bias on the grand scale, randomly confusing cause and effect because no-one stops to ask if the flap of the butterfly's wing causes the change in the air current or if it is the change in the air current which is the reason that the butterfly chooses that precise moment to flap it's wing in a particular direction.

    • @eddiehubbs9492
      @eddiehubbs9492 6 месяцев назад +6

      U must have went to middle school I didn't mak it past 5yh grade u no some big words

    • @vc7393
      @vc7393 6 месяцев назад +4

      So, this is someone that like to talk about them selves, and just thinks their smart?

    • @timroderick2314
      @timroderick2314 6 месяцев назад +1

      Precisely. Made a decent movie though.

    • @vc7393
      @vc7393 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@eddiehubbs9492 And you have obviously have no sense of humor.

    • @eddiehubbs9492
      @eddiehubbs9492 6 месяцев назад +3

      I magine u philosophize about all the bad in the world but what do you do to help it

  • @BennyMcGhee
    @BennyMcGhee 7 месяцев назад +164

    There’s more than one butterfly in the world flapping its wings. The scariest thing about the universe is that our tiny little brains are capable of taking it all in. Imagine a brain the size of the Sun. Or a galaxy. Indeed, the entire universe could be one giant brain. Either way, we are all individually burdened with the weight of our own existence. Sometimes it takes getting really stoned to understand the heaviness of it all.

    • @adamjosey1543
      @adamjosey1543 7 месяцев назад +20

      It is what it is.
      Say no to drugs, kids.

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat 7 месяцев назад +7

      There's nothing heavy about it. What it comes down to is that we are different in life for love. Please read some of the realizations by such saints as Anandamayi Ma, Rabindranath Tagore or Jesus.

    • @lendalennuk2484
      @lendalennuk2484 7 месяцев назад +3

      @@Ekam-Sat ... and Krishnamurti.

    • @david_cop_a_feel7538
      @david_cop_a_feel7538 6 месяцев назад +2

      @@adamjosey1543 - Thank God for that! Can you just imagine if it wasn't? (what it was)

    • @david_cop_a_feel7538
      @david_cop_a_feel7538 6 месяцев назад +4

      The drawback to that is that, even though you 'figure it all out' while hashed out to the shits, once it wears off you can't quite put your finger on it.

  • @giannicallegari
    @giannicallegari 7 месяцев назад +20

    Good job, well done, guys! I am a physicist and have studied these phenomena, yet they do not cease to give me shivers and awe!

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 7 месяцев назад +1

      "Good job", "well done", "physicist", "have studied". Heard all that before. Déjà vu.
      Same questions to you too, therefore: Please do explain how the formulas and figures shown at 14:29 in the video clarify the narrative ("deterministic equations such as Newtons laws of motion do not always result in a deterministic universe"). In special, I would like to hear from you how the term in brackets, i.e. (t/T - x/λ), is derived in the formula at the top of the screen, center between left and right. As you can see, this term is being multiplied with E_k. How does it influence the result (i.e. the right side of the equation, 1/2 mv^2)? Also, please explain the role of the Δ symbol that occurs twice in the formula at the upper left of screen, and tell us how the large U-shaped object that's depicted middle right fits into the big picture.
      You've studied physics, so it should be an easy task for you.

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat 7 месяцев назад +1

      By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another. - John 13:35 NIV

    • @greywolf271
      @greywolf271 6 месяцев назад +4

      @@Nonononono_Ohno He must have mixed up the Bible and his physics textbook

    • @sailingaristos2472
      @sailingaristos2472 10 дней назад +1

      ​@@Nonononono_Ohno Thank you, sir

    • @sailingaristos2472
      @sailingaristos2472 10 дней назад +1

      ​@@Ekam-Satwhat does that have to do with chaos theory?

  • @user-ew5pq3ek9q
    @user-ew5pq3ek9q 6 месяцев назад +3

    Fascinating description. Well done! This is very useful information

  • @AT-ol2yj
    @AT-ol2yj 7 месяцев назад +60

    There was nothing “chaotic” about the chaos game at the beginning. You were following a set of rules that would obviously lead to the Sierpinski Triangle if you put some thought into it. The second game wasn’t deterministic as you were randomly removing a number, even though it was the first number, you’re still removing a random element. After watching the first two fails you lost me on this one.

    • @user-ur9yq6ik1h
      @user-ur9yq6ik1h 7 месяцев назад +9

      Another Ai created channel?

    • @eiwo323s
      @eiwo323s 7 месяцев назад +4

      Yes chaos usually flows on cycles where they form into fractals. It may have had a little quasi chaos but you can measure. The amount of chaos based on Lyapunov exponents.

    • @jaydils9680
      @jaydils9680 7 месяцев назад +1

      ❤❤❤❤ 💯

    • @lucasbrelivet5238
      @lucasbrelivet5238 7 месяцев назад +3

      Do you mean that the number is random because the starting number was random?

    • @luckyMePopUp
      @luckyMePopUp 7 месяцев назад +3

      It's not chaotic" because everything is in a wave, and the random comes into play, it all depends how you ride the wave .

  • @chasepalagi7675
    @chasepalagi7675 6 месяцев назад +4

    3:00 your example is control disguised as chaos.
    You are marking in the middle of every roll. That is not chaos, that is a pattern.
    There is no other conceivable outcome.

  • @johnnypoker46
    @johnnypoker46 3 месяца назад +2

    A butterfly flapping its wings could just as easily prevent a tornado from occurring, as cause one.
    So it's not worth worrying about

  • @Fenrisson
    @Fenrisson 4 месяца назад +11

    0:02 - BRAZIL MENTIONED!!!

  • @MA4TU2
    @MA4TU2 7 месяцев назад +24

    Wow - what a great explanation. A complex topic that has been distilled down to 20m, a sign of brilliance. Excellent!

    • @SolidSiren
      @SolidSiren 7 месяцев назад +5

      This is not a good explanation and this video appears to have about 30 minutes of work put into it.

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@SolidSiren Really? That much??

    • @JMazzaTaz
      @JMazzaTaz 7 месяцев назад

      And I’ve never learned so much about fish in one video, so there’s that

    • @Desmond-Dark
      @Desmond-Dark 5 месяцев назад +1

      @@JMazzaTaz 🤣

  • @wadeedden4552
    @wadeedden4552 7 месяцев назад +40

    Thermodynamics and its laws are a good place to start to study chaos theory. Even though individual particles of a gas move randomly we can predict temperature, pressure, and volume. Keep in mind that the ontology of thermodynamics includes a caveat. Included in the analysis is the requirement of a quasistatic, adiabatic process. If you want a more humanistic idea of this you should read Issac Asimov and his Foundation series of books. The premise of the Foundation series relies on the “gas laws” of classical physics to sketch out the story.

    • @FixItStupid
      @FixItStupid 7 месяцев назад

      Nuclear Bonds Good To Know ??? & So Fluoride In The Water By LAW ? Oh Why ??? & Schools ??? Lawyer Greed Law

    • @transientaardvark6231
      @transientaardvark6231 7 месяцев назад +14

      I'm afraid you've got that completely wrong. I mean, what you say is correct but it's missing the point. The whole point about thermodynamics is that the tiny (or even quite large) differences don't matter, they all average out to well behaved phenomena. The point of chaos is that the tiniest differences matter massively and can lead to hugely different outcomes.

    • @arturofuente4832
      @arturofuente4832 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@transientaardvark6231 Thanks for the info.

    • @wadeedden4552
      @wadeedden4552 7 месяцев назад

      I understanding there is sensitive dependence on initial conditions. The epiphenomenon of order in the midst the thermodynamics is transitory whilst the final result is predictable. I must say that your posted video is very spot on and mostly complete, thank you for that.@@transientaardvark6231

    • @mactabilis6039
      @mactabilis6039 7 месяцев назад

      thanks wade! you comment, too, is informative.

  • @1917WorkingClass
    @1917WorkingClass 3 месяца назад +1

    Great food for the thinking mind. Adding new drawers to our cabinets of knowledge inside our minds. There's a lot of effort in the visuals as well; contributes to the video being of a higher standard.
    One room for improvement though, is to incorporate little silent voids, to process the presented information, and to prepare for what comes next. Plus, a rudimentary summary every now and then, to help each core piece of the theory to be stored, and to be stored in the right drawer.

  • @davidwood2387
    @davidwood2387 7 месяцев назад +43

    The 3 dots in there positions all ready represent a triangle, so it will form many triangles .

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад +13

      If you understand geometry many things become obvious.

    • @chrisrichardson8881
      @chrisrichardson8881 7 месяцев назад +1

      As long as the three points are not co-linear. It can be a very obtuse form of a triangle.

    • @jarnoronkainen75
      @jarnoronkainen75 6 месяцев назад

      does that theory work lol... with that geogebra site ... do the same trick with 4 dots and you still get triangles :p~

    • @Sutanreyu
      @Sutanreyu 6 месяцев назад

      Plus, the scheme in which you play the chaos game is what makes the pattern: it's a wave function.
      Change the function and you get a different pattern.

    • @david_cop_a_feel7538
      @david_cop_a_feel7538 6 месяцев назад +3

      It's actually 'their', but thanks for dropping by.

  • @CoolHandLouis
    @CoolHandLouis 7 месяцев назад +18

    You made a mistake in the segment "Can you predict the future of our number?" It's totally predictable and there's no chaos about it. According to what was shown, multiplying by 10 and removing the integer portion, it creates a simple series: 0.123267203462345822542, 0.23267203462345822542, 0.3267203462345822542, ..., 0.542, 0.42, 0.2, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0. etc. I can predict that millionth iteration is still 0.0.

    • @TheNewsicalProfessor
      @TheNewsicalProfessor 6 месяцев назад +2

      That's exactly what i thought, keep multiply by 10, and remove the 1st number (ahead of the decimal point), and you hit zero pretty quickly. And after that it will always remain zero. How could this producer get this so wrong? Is this really 100% AI generated? If so, more fools will be created!

    • @chickenmuffin
      @chickenmuffin 5 месяцев назад +2

      Right? This made no sense. It made me think this whole video might have been made by AI.

    • @billjohnson9472
      @billjohnson9472 5 месяцев назад

      your calculation appears to have precision rounding. the answer may differ with different levels of rounding.

    • @XtreeM_FaiL
      @XtreeM_FaiL 5 месяцев назад

      American AI. Can't understand decimal system.

  • @DeepObserver7689
    @DeepObserver7689 6 месяцев назад +4

    The most unpredictable thing is our mind and Supreme Consciousness lying within whole matter of Universe 😌

  • @SA-ui6hh
    @SA-ui6hh 2 месяца назад +1

    That was the best summary . You put words and explanation on something deeply felt

  • @noprivacyleft
    @noprivacyleft 7 месяцев назад +8

    This video is perhaps adequate at describing a layman's superficial understanding of the subject matter, but never really explains what the "terrifying theory scientists don't want to talk about" is, or why it is "terrifying". This is pretty much click bait drivel as far as I can tell, but with a quite a bit of effort put into it, so slightly better than most click bait drivel. I clicked it, so it worked.

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 7 месяцев назад +3

      Yes, you clicked it and it worked, but only because of the clickbait title, right? And you stayed because of the clickbaity language ("but trust me, it's way more serious than you think"... conspiracy, anyone?). And if there's so much effort in it, why does it start right away with the mistake of presenting the butterfly effect as a "probabilistic mode" when in fact it's an example for deterministic (i.e., *not* probabilistic!) chaos?

    • @sailingaristos2472
      @sailingaristos2472 10 дней назад

      Yes, and if anyone really listens to the video and ignores the tone of voice and fancy language, they'll find not much being said

  • @gaddafykibao3545
    @gaddafykibao3545 7 месяцев назад +10

    Honestly this is a very informative video not only on the scientific side of things but in life like actual life ….I am a stock trader and the fractals part is spot on 😊

    • @falconquest2068
      @falconquest2068 7 месяцев назад +1

      I was a little put off by his example of the stock market. He said, and I am paraphrasing, when a stock price changes, it causes people to buy or sell. Uh, the stock price changes BECAUSE people buy or sell. It's a market, stock prices don't change on their own. (although it may seem that way based on all of the shenanigans that go on in the background).

    • @jonh8488
      @jonh8488 7 месяцев назад +1

      AI has access to the same info as you do.

    • @falconquest2068
      @falconquest2068 7 месяцев назад

      @@jonh8488 You are correct sir.

    • @SolidSiren
      @SolidSiren 7 месяцев назад +1

      There is next to no science in this video.

  • @AlexthunderGnum
    @AlexthunderGnum 7 месяцев назад +34

    I think, it is stretched a bit too far. In the triangle example, all the dots positions were pre-determined. The probability had nothing to do with them. It was only the choice of "which one first and next". Of course, after a number of repetitions you see all the pre-determined dots revealed with the pattern. You didn't need the randomness to produce that result. You might as well simply enumerate all the choices in simple order. It would be less amusing to watch, of course, but may be that is the whole point? It is not about a discovery of something new and yet unknown, but really about entertainment and amusement. What is more amusing to watch happening, that is "the discovery", I suppose.

    • @joeshmoe7967
      @joeshmoe7967 7 месяцев назад +4

      My first thought. The triangle patterns 'appears', due to starting with 3 dots AND the 'rule' to roll the dice and move from the half way point to the next point by the rule of where to go based on what was rolled.
      I bet starting with more points would end up creating a very predictable pattern. That example doesn't sell it for me.

    • @oo7moses
      @oo7moses 6 месяцев назад

      He used math to create a pattern! It's chaos!

    • @AlexthunderGnum
      @AlexthunderGnum 6 месяцев назад

      @@oo7moses What do you mean? I don't see any chaos. It looks like perfect order instead. Very predictable order. What was the surprise to you?

    • @oo7moses
      @oo7moses 6 месяцев назад +1

      @@AlexthunderGnum It was sarcasm!

    • @louiscolborn6715
      @louiscolborn6715 4 месяца назад

      It's kinda like: how many peas are in a pod true or false? 😊 How many basket balls does it take to get to the moon.

  • @Edenismdotca
    @Edenismdotca 6 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you for taking the time to make this video. This topic absolutely fascinating!

  • @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
    @Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time Месяц назад

    We need to go back to r² and the three-dimensional physics of the Inverse Square Law. The spherical 4πr² geometry is key to this concept, based on Huygens' Principle from 1670, which states, "Every point on a wave front of light has the potential to create a new spherical 4πr² light wave."
    Each point on the curvature of the wave front can be considered a potential photon ∆E=hf electron interaction exchanging potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter in the form of electrons.
    We experienced this as a continuously emerging probabilistic future 'time' with the spherical 4πr² surface acting as a boundary condition or manifold for the uncertainty ∆x∆pᵪ≥h/4π encountered in daily life.

  • @joshisdriven
    @joshisdriven 7 месяцев назад +3

    So with the fish... it's true that they will never all be in the exact same position with the exact same trajectory, inertia, momentum etc... BUT ONLY because of the limiter of time. Should the fish live forever and not age, they will 100% replicate the exact same situation infinite times.
    I'm not sure what the significance of this is but it's fun to consider.

    • @joshisdriven
      @joshisdriven 7 месяцев назад

      so are these chaotic systems made possible by entropy?

  • @abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323
    @abeautifulmindispoetrydefi5323 7 месяцев назад +11

    Even E.T. said on several occasions that we do not understand what we are capable of doing, which is partly why they too live here on our planet with us. As some want to see our ascension up to the next level. Admittedly we have lots of faults as with many of the species that are tens of thousands of years ahead of us. Which I now hope will put things into perspective. Thank you for reading, and have a good night.

    • @jeremygreen2439
      @jeremygreen2439 6 месяцев назад

      The Others have their faults, too, It is not quite THEY: golden and enlightened vs US: stupid and naval gazing (though yes). Weird things have happened. Some people are exploiting THEM. What we think as a "UFO" is sometimes an entire BODY that changes; sometimes it is a copy of a body or a vessel and such. There's so much to learn, it is like drinking from a hose

    • @JohnGrandline
      @JohnGrandline 6 месяцев назад +1

      they'll go extinct early haha

  • @williamcorycory7836
    @williamcorycory7836 6 месяцев назад +2

    best thing i've seen since melody sheep's museum of alien life 2. thank you so much . big respect

  • @miguelmartinez2488
    @miguelmartinez2488 6 месяцев назад +2

    It makes me sad I can't have deep conversations like this with my family because they don't understand/care about this . Can't believe I understand this stuff.🎉

    • @user-dq2zx2ei4m
      @user-dq2zx2ei4m 3 месяца назад

      Older souls have closed minds. They were raised in a different lighter light.

  • @coryrichardson7272
    @coryrichardson7272 7 месяцев назад +8

    Thanks Fexl I love these video's. This one gave me an epiphany or two including something I've not quantified yet about how randomness doesn't matter with regard to the outcome of a system. The moment you began the 1st roll of the die picked the pre-made design / outcome. Always has a good way of conveying an idea with clear logic. Thanks again.

    • @user-kb8qw7dy4t
      @user-kb8qw7dy4t 6 месяцев назад +1

      The moment you decided the rules for where to place the dots determined the outcome.

  • @DeweyKiller
    @DeweyKiller 6 месяцев назад +8

    Where's the "Don't recommend this Channel" when ya need it ?

    • @aman7525
      @aman7525 3 месяца назад

      As soon as I heard the AI voice and saw this comment. 🏃🏾💨

  • @DADela-ht6ux
    @DADela-ht6ux 3 месяца назад

    I read James Gleick's book over a decade ago. Brilliant.
    I've always excelled in mathematics, and there are dimensions within geometry we have yet to understand. My interests shifted toward quantum mechanics afterword.
    There's a multidimensional universe all around us. Up until recently, all we've been able to see and measure - from our limited 3D perspective - is the little shining spheres all around us.
    We haven't even figured out gravity yet. You can't create gravity without understanding levity.
    Excellent commentary!

  • @vezolf4313
    @vezolf4313 22 дня назад +1

    Thats just so stupid, its crazy people believe in such things

  • @TerryConspiracy420
    @TerryConspiracy420 3 месяца назад +7

    There are no mistakes in this Universe.
    Not even one molecule can be out of place... anywhere.

  • @tomato1040
    @tomato1040 7 месяцев назад +4

    Like in Jazz🎺🎶, overcoming chaos comes from choosing🦉wisely,🤯improvisation in♾️the moment😂!

  • @Adam_Lyskawa
    @Adam_Lyskawa 4 месяца назад +1

    Negative feedback loops usually provide stability. Positive feedback loops lead to destruction and chaos. However, the positive feedback loops are useful too when they are controlled. I wonder if the nature ever does it. In technology we use positive feedback loops in all kind of radios and signal generators (a resonance is a case of positive feedback) and in nuclear reactors, when a chain reaction is moderated. BTW, predator-pray loops used to be very stable until external environmental factors broke the stable conditions. Yes, it's another way of saying we broke it. However, even broken, destabilized systems can get back to equilibrium over time.

  • @change9929
    @change9929 7 дней назад +1

    In a computer,if you press delete once,you might delete everything,if the button gets stuck.😮😅

  • @kanubeenderman
    @kanubeenderman 7 месяцев назад +3

    there are localized effects that have no bearing on macro systems. I'm not worried about a tornado storm when a cloud of butterflies take wing

  • @DihelsonMendonca
    @DihelsonMendonca 7 месяцев назад +2

    ⚠️ The AI voice is from Eleven labs. Terrible. Many channels are using this same voice. The content here is also wrong in several points. 😮😮

  • @erikblaas5826
    @erikblaas5826 6 месяцев назад +3

    I had the Butterfly wings principle been thought in a different way..... The loose nail of a horse shoe can cause the loss of a war and the loss of a kingdom...

    • @oopsadaze
      @oopsadaze 6 месяцев назад +1

      That's a Todd Rundgren song..."For the Want of a Nail', but it gets to the point of 'what else could the answer be?'

    • @dareese6778
      @dareese6778 4 месяца назад

      & a loose tongue looses a girlfriend. 😢😅

  • @WH40KHero
    @WH40KHero 6 месяцев назад +11

    An interesting observation about the chaos game:
    Due to the nature of the ruleset you immediately limit the area in which dots can be placed, removing a ton of potential randomness from the get-go.
    Id say in this case specifically its not too surprising if you end up with something orderly.

  • @malakannagowli2350
    @malakannagowli2350 7 месяцев назад +2

    Probability and determinantal phenomenon make us to use our thinking power to exhaust completely. Likewise chaotic theory also. There is nothing like determinantal (that is sure to happen) phenomenon.
    As said in this video we like determinantal things , that is we want trains to run at fixed time, we need rains should stick to rainy season only. Like that we want our space activities should also be as expected. No problem any where correct take off correct journey and correct landing on moon or other planets and so on.
    We want everything determinantal ( that is accurate) but we have seen more failure then success in almost all cases.
    But probability can be relied. Trains may run in time or may not be in time. Our space activities can be accurate as planned or may end in failure.
    Predictability , we must hope but we should be ready to face failure as well.
    We can not predict weather, stock market, and many more cases as said in this video. There is quontom theory , which says the same thing that is nothing is predictable.
    So my view is we should be ready to sacrifice determinantal and accept probability in every aspect in physical world as well as behavioural aspects as well.
    We can not predict behaviour of any one continuously.
    Thanks for the video showing the various systems showing contradictory elements associated with each system like determinantal and probability.

  • @durrcodurr
    @durrcodurr 5 месяцев назад +1

    4:16 the explanation is wrong, b/c computers usually cannot store decimal floating-point numbers *at all* . Instead, they use *binary* floating-point numbers, with digits after the point representing 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, and so forth. A "double" is usually implemented as 64-bit IEEE binary floating-point number. This binary representation is completely deterministic, however b/c the format cannot precisely "store" the decimal digits specified after the decimal point, it's only an approximation (compare 1/2 vs 1/3, for instance -- try to write them down as binary floating-point as an exercise).

  • @jimkirby1799
    @jimkirby1799 7 месяцев назад +5

    Because of chaos, determinism can have anomalies arise because of the indeterminate consequences that may unfold. Determinism is still at the whim of probability.

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад +3

      And everyone ignores the will. Life is in many ways what you make it. There are no limits if you understand the people around you and what moves them. But this is not the average human. Some were born to change the world.

    • @amorfati4096
      @amorfati4096 17 дней назад

      @@Willy_Tepes😂

  • @the_proteus_void
    @the_proteus_void 7 месяцев назад +5

    Probability breaks down at a certain point and determinism takes over as an event unfolds. Even if that transfer is only at a Planck distance in a Planck time away from the culmination of the event. Until then, some level of uncertainty still exists.

    • @karlschmied6218
      @karlschmied6218 7 месяцев назад +2

      No, uncertainty is a fundamental ingredient in quantum mechanics.

    • @the_proteus_void
      @the_proteus_void 7 месяцев назад

      @@karlschmied6218 I appreciate the sentiment, but I'm referring to a real life event, such as picking up my phone. I'm not referring to a theoretical event or any math involved in the quantum mechanical realm. Real life doesn't rely on quantum mechanics, which is only our perception that we desire to measure and comprehend. In real life, uncertainties exist in the probability field only up to the moment that I have actually picked up my phone. At that point, the probability field collapses and the uncertainty pertaining to the completion of that specific event ceases to exist. Other uncertainties still exist relating to a wide array of other possibilities, but it's not going to be the same uncertainty.

    • @karlschmied6218
      @karlschmied6218 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@the_proteus_void Ok now I know what you mean. But I could not see that in your first statement.

    • @the_proteus_void
      @the_proteus_void 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@karlschmied6218 Understood. Sometimes thoughts come out as incomplete statements. I'm glad I was able to clarify.

    • @karlschmied6218
      @karlschmied6218 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@the_proteus_void Thanks!

  • @dukeon
    @dukeon 6 месяцев назад +1

    Just because a butterfly flapping its wings has consequences around the world in a way that’s so complex we could never trace the cause->effect throughline, doesn’t mean it’s random or probablistic at all. Everything (in this regime) is still deterministic, but absurdly complex.
    True probabilistic behavior is something like radioactive decay, though since we don’t fully understand quantum physics at a conceptual level, it’s possible even this type occurrence has an as-yet unseen cause.
    You could sum up the current state of physics by saying we have two understandings of reality: one deterministic (relativity) and one probabilistic (QM). They cannot both be true, yet it appears to us that they are.

  • @tarawasjesus
    @tarawasjesus 6 месяцев назад +1

    I now understand why a single dice is called a die. The thinking dead realm does "play dice." It's hissing gulping puffball is chaotic because you have no idea when it will kill you or when it will stop you from revealing it killed you. It is then you realize the uncertainty principle means, ultimately, what is symmetry. Well, the flashing complementary realm is not symmetrical because there is no conservation. The synthetics from the dead realm who quantum tunnel through lie they're real. So, the difference between a real fractal and an electric one is the real one doesn't want to kill you or use you as a battery. In this video they clearly squash the real fractals and electric fractals into one realm. They "renormalize." So, what the scientists are scared of, or should be, is that they've called zero pt mass and mass zero pt. The thinking part of the mass is what threw them because it is able to make light speed seem instantaneous through an energy exchange. That is the true illusion the real "illuminati" wants to bring to our understanding. Their conclusions are twisted. IOW, this should be that and that should be this.

  • @raymondterrazas5702
    @raymondterrazas5702 7 месяцев назад +8

    Theory’s are always interesting to learn about.

    • @davidrandell2224
      @davidrandell2224 7 месяцев назад

      “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics.

  • @londomolari5715
    @londomolari5715 6 месяцев назад +3

    Where do we get any randomness? The only thing I can think of is the decay of a neutron into a proton. What happens is well described, but why it happens is not. It seems spontaneous and random. Ultimately, it is an up quark turning into a down quark.

    • @curiosorealidad8265
      @curiosorealidad8265 2 месяца назад +1

      Its because its a holograph universe, we are never allowed to go faster then the speed of load of the holograph=speed of light, we are not allowed to know why everything is posible but some things have less chance of happining, like crashing a car into a tree has a 99.9 % of more chance then uncrashing a car from a tree and the car undenting itself, this is posible but the chance of it happining is only a 00.1% and the chance of that low is that it wont happen in the whole life of the universe, the why is what makes it interesting, in the real reality out of this fake holographic life we built this game because the real reality is so boring with no changes,no caos,no death,no adrenaline, and we needed something that would make us feel fear,worry,love,etc. inmortalidad is more boring then we can remember, so we builted this holografic universe and started to play one life after another and here we are, of course you cant feel any emotions or it wont be fun if you remember that its a game right? So when we are in here playing we have no memory or its hard to access, to make it "fun" with emotions,just look at the ones in the lider places, if there was a real price to pay like hell when we die do you think they would go around starting wars,killing,etc., they know much more then we, one last thing to notice is the NPC los humanos sin alma o de relleno, estan por todas partes,familia,amigos,conocidos, estos su rostro se repite multiples veces por la poco varedad para la simulacion para elegir caracters, ellos los reconoces porque viven una vida sin cambios, no les importa nada, hasta parece que no sienten, solo trabajo-casa, no saben ni lo basico de como funciona la electricidad,technologia,etc., y cuando les explicas como te dicen sabelotodo o simplemente no te entienden,

    • @curiosorealidad8265
      @curiosorealidad8265 2 месяца назад

      Why or how did a part of my F comment translate to F spanish?

  • @jemreignbow2725
    @jemreignbow2725 2 месяца назад +1

    Chaos Theory seems to be the exact manner in which the realm of material physicality has fundamentally been established.
    Let me explain.
    The universe and / or Divine Architect , came to construct this dimension of the " material " utilizing the elements of natural law as an essential much needed existential outline.
    Setting the stage for all conscious life using these predetermined factors in order for free thinking man to build upon.
    Conceptually establishing original factors that in no way can be impeded upon.
    As long as those same essential elements that have been formulated since the very beginning , remain as such , all other forces that occupy the world of the animate can perform any and all activities without interference or obstruction.
    Now establishing an entirely new deterministic element that being the universal law of free will.

  • @HankKroll
    @HankKroll 7 месяцев назад +1

    COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES
    The greatest detective story of all time! Who were the Anunnaki? Where was sun was born? Where did the light come from to create all coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick. It could no come from the sun at Earth had a thick CO2 atmosphere.
    Earth is very unique indeed. Our solar system was born in Orion. After we left Orion Earth froze up for a billion or so years because space is cold and the sun didn’t burn as hot back then. At that time early Earth had one ocean and one continent with a 1000 PSI carbon dioxide atmosphere much like Venus has today. With such a thick 3000-mile deep atmosphere you wouldn’t see the sun. Our solar system was captured by Sirius A and B about 850-million years ago. Sirius B is the size of Earth but has 1.5 solar masses. It was the light from those objects that created all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the Sun. The sun could not get through a 3000-mile-deep atmosphere. Alll that carbon dioxideis underground now in the form of coal, oil and limestone layers up to 12,500-feet thick.
    Sirius B is the size of Earth puts out more than 100 times the light of our sun in the UV spectrum. Sirius B is in a fifty-year elliptical orbit around the two-solar-mass Sirius A of 8 to 12 astronomical units. At 8 AU it could feed off Sirius A and put out more than 1000 times the light of our sun. One teaspoonful of Sirius B would weigh more than a city bus on Earth.
    The Anunnaki’s home planet is in the Sirius system. You need ORME gold, the white powder gold mentioned in Exodus to spray in your atmosphere to shield it from the harsh UV light of Sirius B. The Nephilim came to Earth 400,000 years ago to mine gold. They tried to get it out of seawater but that wasn’t enough for their needs so they moved to South Africa. They imported a race of smaller workers called Igigi to dig underground because the Nephilim are tall. Some are twenty-feet tall making it impractical for them to go underground due to cave-ins.
    Enlil was a hard taskmaster who worked many of the Igigi to death. His brother Enki was more kind causing friction between himself and his brother. Enlil starved 15,000 Igigi to death. Eventually they rebelled and sought refuge away from the mines.
    The Anunnaki/Nephilim needed workers to continue mining gold so they did genetic experiments using some of their own DNA. After many tries they created a subservient creature they called Adam. They needed a genetically compatible mate so they took part of Adam’s rib to clone Eve. Problems developed when humans became aware that the large beings were not gods but slave masters. Nakosh, on of the reptilian aliens raped Eve and she became aware of the knowledge of good and evil. She convinced Adam to get the Hell out of Eden. It was for their own safety that they departed Eden.
    The newly created humans were capable of mating with the other indigenous races living on the planet. The Nephilim or Elohim kept the knowledge of the white-powder-gold from the humans to limit their age to 120 years so they wouldn’t overpopulate the planet. Other problems arose when the Nephilim looked upon the fair human females and decided to mate with them creating the races of giants the heroes of old, the men of renown. Something had to be done.
    Once the Nephilim had enough gold they burned it into the white powder to take if off planet. It weighs nothing in that state and when heated it weighs less than nothing. Our Sun was leaving the vicinity of the Sirius at that time. The Anunnaki had to leave Earth and ship thei ORME gold to Niberu.
    The remaining eight Elohim on Earth started squabbling among them. They decided to separate each taking their human slaves to different parts of the Earth. One went to China, another to Tibet. Quetzalcóatl - god of winds and rain and the creator of humanity took his slaves and built pyramids in Central America. Huitzilopochtli - the supreme god of the Sun and war built pyramids and cities in the Amazon and roads connecting South America with Central America.
    A gigantic 239-meter high Chinese Pyramid in a Gigantic Forgotten Walled City of Shimao is located in the northern part of the Loess Plateau, bordering the Ordos Desert. Shimao is often referred to as “The Chinese Pyramid of Civilization,” because it is the largest late-Neolithic archaeological site in China. Dated to around 2000 BC.
    This Chinese pyramid structure was the base for a grand palace that sat on the flat top of the pyramid. This gigantic palace at the top of the pyramid was the size of 10 football fields or 861,112 square feet (80,000 square meters). It overlooked a walled city, which was 50 times bigger than the palace area. Recently, a garden pool where crocodiles were kept.
    Thoth built the Great Pyramid in Egypt. He wrote the 48 books of Thoth and the Tablet and taught the Greeks mathematics and healing. YHWH the un-pronounceable name of Moses God was responsible for monotheism of Christians and Jewish religion. He instructed Moses to take three million Hebrews slaves out of Egypt. They camped out in the wilderness for 40-years to kill off all the old religions. Moses fed the children the priest bread to purify their DNA. YHWH was an outcast and could not go to the Promised Land until the other Anunnaki/Elohim departed. He was a giant bird-like creature with a beak.
    Enlil decided to bring the Moon into orbit around Earth. To move it one simply started up the huge pumps moving the ocean inside off center of mass in the direction they wanted to go. Enlil realized that the resulting impact would cause world-wide floods and he only wanted to save most of the flora and fauna. Enki was forbidden to tell his son, Noah about the impending flood. Instead he drew plans for an Ark and a letter to Noah explaining the situation. Noah was a giant half man half Anunnaki/Elohim/Nephilim. The rest is history.
    It was little Sirius B that created most all the coal, oil and limestone on Earth, not the sun. When you are driving your car down the road or heating your house with electricity generated by a coal generating plant you are recycling stellar energy that did not come from the Sun!
    Humanity has been worshiping the wrong sun god for the last 4000 years. The ancient Egyptians knew we were in orbit around Sirius and based their New Year when Sirius becomes visible on the horizon. Book: COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES can be found on: www.GuardDogBooks.com or: www.Amazon.com and book stores around the world in China, Japan, Indonesia and Europe.
    1000-foot tall pyramid in China.

  • @daxons2889
    @daxons2889 7 месяцев назад +8

    What about if consicious mind observing makes paterns and shapes out of the Chaos.

    • @jules6601
      @jules6601 5 месяцев назад +1

      Uhhhhhhhhhhh yeah it's called the observer effect. Schrödinger's cat and all that. None of this is new. Einstein ushered in the quantum physical age. He famously said "God does not play dice" believing in a static universe and an unsplittable atom. Then they split the atom and Hubble laid bare the redshift in galaxies moving apart at various rates "The Hubble Constant". Einstein relented, god does indeed play dice. Probablism and determinism coexist in a Newtonian and Einsteinian universe. Shocking new science c. 1915.

  • @ozymandiasultor9480
    @ozymandiasultor9480 7 месяцев назад +9

    The flap of the butterfly "can" cause a tornado half a globe away IF that flap, the "wind" of that flap was in some very improbable manner reinforced with other winds caused by other things, and if that flap was the initial snowflake in the big snowball which would be the eventual tornado at the end. BUT, that is very unlikely to happen.

  • @xf_jaguar1162
    @xf_jaguar1162 5 месяцев назад

    "In the realm of Particle Physics and Particle Chemistry, a captivating debate surrounds the fundamental constituents of matter, specifically focusing on the intricate building blocks of quarks, electrons, and gluons Can we unravel the profound essence of these particles and their interactions, which ultimately sculpt the very fabric of our universe? Delving into the heart of this discourse lies a fundamental question: What are the elemental particles that constitute quarks, electrons, and gluons, and how do their dynamic interplays delineate the fundamental architecture of matter? As we probe deeper into the subatomic realm, we unravel the mysterious dance of quarks, the elementary particles that make up protons and neutrons. Are they truly indivisible, or do they harbour deeper complexities awaiting discovery? Likewise, electrons, the enigmatic carriers of electric charge, stand as solitary entities, yet their behaviour perplexes even the most astute physicists. How do these particles, seemingly devoid of internal structure, exert such profound influence over the properties of matter? And then, there are gluons, the mediators of the strong force binding quarks together within the confines of atomic nuclei. How do these elusive particles govern the stability and structure of the very matter from which life itself emerges? In the grand tapestry of existence, proteins and sugars, the very building blocks of life, find their genesis in the intricate arrangements of these fundamental particles. Can we decipher the profound implications of these subatomic constituents on the macroscopic world, shedding light on the origins of life itself? Thus, the discourse unfolds, as we delve into the depths of particle physics, seeking to unravel the mysteries of existence through the lens of quarks, electrons, and gluons, and their profound implications for the nature of reality and the origins of life."

  • @lloydgarth1
    @lloydgarth1 6 месяцев назад

    Please give credit where credit is due:
    *Lorenz Butterfly Effect*
    Source: When the Butterfly Effect Took Flight | MIT Technology Review
    "The unexpected result led Lorenz to a powerful insight about the way nature works: small changes can have large consequences. The idea came to be known as the “butterfly effect” after Lorenz suggested that the flap of a butterfly's wings might ultimately cause a tornado."

  • @petevenuti7355
    @petevenuti7355 7 месяцев назад +3

    Don't forget chaotic attractors.

  • @LukeRiedler
    @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад +3

    I wonder, would you get the same result, with the triangles, if done by hand? Or, what if you had a computer with the ability to process things outside the standard defined variables? Love the video.

    • @jonathanspivey437
      @jonathanspivey437 7 месяцев назад +2

      Could you guarantee the exact same hand motions every time at every level?
      Chaos(or unpredictability) does not exist as absolute, but as relative. What seems like chaos are things that we dont understand enough to fully see the path from cause to effect. Our minds are limited, not infinite. So our understanding of anything will always be limited and their always be some chaos to it(relative to our limited understanding).
      However, to a being that infinite understanding(which could only be God, who is infinite) then there wouldnt be any chaos from His perspective because he would have infinity perspective and infinite understanding.
      The point is, some things seem uncertain to us, but thats because of our comprehension and awareness limitations, not because of the nature of the phenomena itself.

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад

      For free will to exist, an I believe it does, on some level anyway, the system has to exist as a set of probable outcomes, that only become defined as now moves forward. It would still chaos, just contained within specific bounds. I think we see things in much the same way, just providing my interpretation. @@jonathanspivey437

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 3 месяца назад

      @@jonathanspivey437 I think free will is chaos, but god has computing power to allow for choice (sometimes) that exists within a set of outcomes that are acceptable.

  • @Zariston
    @Zariston 6 месяцев назад +1

    Butterfly effect is deterministic. I have a better analogy, a bee landing on your nose can save your life. You are about to cross the road, green light indicates you can go but there is a car rushing about to hit you, out of nowhere a bee lands on your nose you step back and try to gently get rid of it. Someone could maybe start running faster and be hit by the car, but in this instance you "chose" to stop and gently chase it away, why did you chose to stop is deterministic as well. You could be bit by a bee in past as a child while trying to run away, and this is in your subconscious waiting for years to act on your "free decisions" when time comes...

  • @stevenray3029
    @stevenray3029 3 месяца назад

    We were never supposed to know everything. We are human and our time on this planet was meant to begin and end. It’s out of our hands.

  • @Shattered_Instance
    @Shattered_Instance 6 месяцев назад +5

    I go outside with butterfly wings on every morning and flap my wings for hours. Neighbors are convinced I am to blame for everything.

    • @Shattered_Instance
      @Shattered_Instance 6 месяцев назад

      Someone liked my comment... Clearly the wings are working.

    • @glenfoxh
      @glenfoxh 4 месяца назад

      Then stop it.

  • @randywise5241
    @randywise5241 7 месяцев назад +3

    Kind of throws a wrench in Azimov's "Foundation" premise.

    • @StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt
      @StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt 7 месяцев назад +1

      It seems you don't understand the premise of the Foundation series... Because my enjoyment of the series was because Asimov builds the entire series specifically around the concepts of Chaos Theory -- and he even shows how different understanding of the underlying concepts can lead to different schools of thought -- and consequent actions.

    • @randywise5241
      @randywise5241 7 месяцев назад

      @@StarmaxStarmax-zn3xt You cannot predict the future like that. Didn't you listen to the video?

  • @charlesprice925
    @charlesprice925 7 месяцев назад +2

    This overlooks the human capability to manifest change. Greater worlds have been known.

    • @ichimaruvegeta
      @ichimaruvegeta 7 месяцев назад

      What proof other than delusions/hallucinations?

    • @benayers8622
      @benayers8622 7 месяцев назад

      Plenty. Go outside, live, take notice and avoid distraction long enough and youl see@@ichimaruvegeta

    • @charlesprice925
      @charlesprice925 7 месяцев назад +3

      @@ichimaruvegeta You've obviously never don it.

    • @ichimaruvegeta
      @ichimaruvegeta 7 месяцев назад

      @@charlesprice925 that’s a nice way to say you have no proof.

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад

      The German election in 1933. He manifested what was in his mind.@@ichimaruvegeta

  • @23Markthespark
    @23Markthespark 6 месяцев назад +1

    My first time taking shrooms was in a local state park. We took them early and watched the sun rise while we laid on some picnic benches underneath a pavilion. I looked down and noticed that there were small piles of confetti sprinkled all around, probably from a kids birthday party the day before. Then I began to notice something strange. My mind began to assemble the confetti into groups that resembled Mandlebrot sets. I can’t explain it, but to this day I believe that the throwing and settling of confetti is not random, but organized by nature because everything is in perfect order, whether hidden or visible.

  • @thekingofmojacar5333
    @thekingofmojacar5333 7 месяцев назад +16

    Interesting topic, nice video, like always, thanks Fexl! 🙂
    We living beings and our planet is in danger...
    We have to take care about us, animals and plants, about the entire planet!
    What we have done to our planet and all living creatures over the last 200 years can only result in bad karma. We have to change our attitude and learn to really love and respect, everyone and everything... 💞

    • @greywolf271
      @greywolf271 6 месяцев назад

      You got all that from ... wait ! ......Wow !

  • @BuffaloMotivated
    @BuffaloMotivated 7 месяцев назад +8

    So you’re saying trying to create a hurricane from my farts isn’t out of reach. 🤔 Challenge accepted.

    • @rich2fnrock
      @rich2fnrock 7 месяцев назад

      a fartnado

    • @theverseshed
      @theverseshed 7 месяцев назад

      Go down the Sharnado route and you could end up with a 5-arsed Fartnado . . . . or even an Infinite Fartnado.@@rich2fnrock

  • @Sent2Strike
    @Sent2Strike 6 месяцев назад +1

    I love your channel mate! This blew my mind

  • @sailingaristos2472
    @sailingaristos2472 10 дней назад +1

    The guy goes on and on, using technical terms to try sounding logical 🤣🤣🤣

  • @johnstones66
    @johnstones66 6 месяцев назад +7

    This stuff is older than I am and I'm old. Scientists have been talking about it the whole time.

  • @GtommyT
    @GtommyT 7 месяцев назад +7

    That wasn't chaos. Try that point program again but this time your starting and ending points are random each time.
    That would be chaos.
    But as soon as you apply rules, you're no longer in chaos. The universe is chaos until observed because observation creates boundaries and rules for how things are/should be based on inmate bias, understanding, and capabilities of that observer.
    It's why the light slit experiment works and why quanta appear in multiple states until observed. Because of OUR limitations we can't observe the universe in it's true state so we grab at patterns to form boundaries for our experience which eventually appear as universal laws and facts.
    It stems from the fact that everything is the same one thing, and all of time is instantaneous (non-existent)

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 6 месяцев назад

      That the "triangle magic" isn't chaos, yes, agreed. But the rest is a *very* esoteric view, to say the least.

    • @awaben
      @awaben 6 месяцев назад

      @@Nonononono_Ohno It may be a little esoteric (what theory of the nature of reality isn't?) but it's coherent and quite intellectually pleasing. I say thanks to @GtommyT for taking the time to put that one out there. We are seeking greater understanding and enlightenment, after all, or we're doing nothing at all.

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 6 месяцев назад

      @@awaben You have a strange view of coherence. If you really seek understanding, you might better want to consult a good physics textbook, instead of reading completely misunderstood and plain wrong comments under useless videos. As a starting point, I'd like to recommend the Feynman lectures.

    • @awaben
      @awaben 6 месяцев назад

      @@Nonononono_Ohno I hadn't come on here for an argument. But I'm happy to give you a retort:
      You watched the same "useless" video I did, you responded to the same comment I did, you then proceeded to attempt to denigrate my having done so. Presumably you doing the same should be applauded. Tell me, how's that superiority complex working out for you?
      Seems like a timely moment to bust out a bit of Robert Burns:
      "O wad some Power the giftie gie us
      To see oursels as ithers see us!
      It wad frae mony a blunder free us,
      An’ foolish notion"
      Bye, bye now.

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 6 месяцев назад

      ​@@awaben I'm sorry that I've hurt your feelings. However, videos like this one, and the above comment aren't doing science any favor. There are very good reasons for having a concept of passing time in physics. At first glance drivel like 'time does not exist', or 'the universe is chaos until observed' may seem very deep and enigmatic and therefore appealing to some people, but in fact it's just plain wrong. Subsequently it leads to even more completely wrong notions, like chaos being the reason for what we observe in the double slit experiment, or being the reason for the existence of quantum states. Science students who, when learning, come across this kind of nonsense often lose valuable time, which is why I occasionally point it out as what it really is. I hope that makes sense to you, and maybe it lets you understand my reaction to your comment a bit better.

  • @VietTran-xl2ms
    @VietTran-xl2ms 3 месяца назад

    It is obvious to me that reality is a balance of deterministic laws and probabilistic events. One cannot decide to grow wings to fly due to the laws of nature but one does have a chance to invent the machinery in accordance with natural laws to fly, or the chance to earn money to buy a plane ticket to fly.

  • @user-ud5xw8ox8g
    @user-ud5xw8ox8g 18 дней назад +1

    This was cutting edge theory in 1993 lol we've moved on.

  • @michaelward878
    @michaelward878 7 месяцев назад +3

    The deeper you dive into modern science the better you can understand the universe. Like quantum mechanics and the quantum computer. Seth Lloyd wrote the book Programming the Universe. He was the first one to design a buildable quantum computer and the way he figured out how to do this was by studying How the Universe Works like a giant quantum computer that was preprogrammed to do exactly what you see. The most complexed system in the known universe is your brain which gives you ☆ CONSCIOUSNESS ☆

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад

      You sound you like you get it, or are right there. Best of luck. AI and distributed neural networks.

  • @Aangel452
    @Aangel452 7 месяцев назад +7

    Nicely explained yet will always remain mind boggling. Great visuals!

  • @sabrestacey7202
    @sabrestacey7202 7 месяцев назад +1

    Thank you for this. Please consider the Bible Code. It's all there. We just have to identify the butterfly and then search the code to pull out the future for it. Blessed be.

  • @wenaolong
    @wenaolong 3 месяца назад

    First off, to say that a butterfly's wings can be part of a set of conditions which are minimally sufficient to set off a cascading series events that end up including a tornado "very far away" isn't to say something inconsistent with determinism at all, it is simply to highlight that minimally sufficient causal conditions may include surprisingly varied or distally related elements.

  • @WittyBlindEyez-Radio
    @WittyBlindEyez-Radio 7 месяцев назад +3

    Because of hemes Tricemeguistus I understand the principle of three and every single geodesic, singularity, super conductive super determination.....
    It all means even less when the only controlling force is yours end there is no other witness to confirm the happening

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад +1

      Your own experience is in the end all that matters as this is reality for you. There is an objective reality but we will never agree on what it is.
      The sad fact is that most people are deluded as they generally only have one source of information (media), and that information is carefully crafted to keep us ignorant and in line. Unless you have already woken from your sleep, you won't know what I am talking about.

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад

      You got a pretty good grasp of the overall state of things. Any idea on how many of us are awake or whatever? Are there like meetups? I hope you don't read this as sarcasm or insulting or something, seems like that could be a possible defense mechanism of the great distributed neural network that humanity is. Anyway, good luck with your reality (game as I call it), I'm working hard at mine. Trying to become a genetic engineer, hopefully that will allow me more freedom. Eh, at least I get good music.
      @@Willy_Tepes

    • @Holographic-Stallions.X0
      @Holographic-Stallions.X0 7 месяцев назад +1

      What thee actual fuck are you talking bout, Willis‽‽‽ 20:41

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад

      It went completely over your head, didn't it? Kind of proves my point, doesn't it?@@Holographic-Stallions.X0

  • @NothingMaster
    @NothingMaster 7 месяцев назад +29

    It may not seem like it, but this is all inherently linear thinking.

    • @Eaglepass
      @Eaglepass 7 месяцев назад +1

      9-likes were tipping the scales
      I gave you another likable scientology Mystery.
      One moment of a time-piece Superlatives 10th. 🕒 .00-unrelated anything dramatically accounts for 1+1=1plused2.00-unrelated Originally anything is strategy adaptation.
      Butterfly 🦋
      ....... .. no disrespect said opinion is a value

    • @NothingMaster
      @NothingMaster 7 месяцев назад +7

      @@Eaglepass FYI: I only have one RUclips account, and I don’t give myself likes. Also, I didn’t mean to be disrespectful, I merely stated my opinion.

    • @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r
      @m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r 7 месяцев назад +3

      I think you meant, respectfully, this video/concept may sound far out but actually makes complete sense and isn't even making any stretches. The pace of the info was fast for most. It's not a terrifying theory, just science isn't funding any real application of it.

    • @NothingMaster
      @NothingMaster 7 месяцев назад +5

      @@m_e_t_a_p_h_o_r That’s not what I meant at all. What I meant is what I said: linear thinking/logic vs. nonlinear thinking/logic. In other words, the ideas flow linearly in a very straightforward way and are somewhat trivial to grasp. They lack trans-dimensional, or even multidimensional, complexity, and with no imbedded or unexpected anomalies.

    • @whyyoumakethissohard
      @whyyoumakethissohard 7 месяцев назад +2

      @@NothingMaster Yes

  • @dukeon
    @dukeon 6 месяцев назад +1

    This little tour of several branches of physics, in a well-written but roundabout way, reveals nothing a physics student at university doesn’t know. It’s fun to watch because of the fancy visuals (well done). In the end though that’s all it is - a surface level survey of many branches of physics, mathematics, game theory, chaos/complexity. You’d probably affect more people in a positive way if you bit off a smaller chunk of science and do a deeper dive (like Veritaseum). And the title is TOTAL CLICKBAIT, knock that off!

  • @wakeUPdummies
    @wakeUPdummies 6 месяцев назад +2

    All systems tend towards chaos, yet new systems emerge from the chaos.

  • @erikolsen1333
    @erikolsen1333 2 месяца назад

    Chaos is small changes in initial conditions yield to larger changes later on….
    However calculus measures the smoothness of a system the other side of that coin would be like the roughness of the system ie the fractality… in a chaotic system there are always patterns proven within in it…
    You see the physics still applies but we don’t have a hope in capturing every location and vector of an atom in a system. If could calculate we would have amazingly accurate forecasts…
    But calculating every atoms interactions in a storm would be mind boggling but we know the patter is quite real when a funnel cloud forms or it starts to rain.

  • @JKDVIPER
    @JKDVIPER 7 месяцев назад +5

    6:34 The biggest thing for me was noticing how the astronomers were saying that in order for galaxies to hold together they must need extra mass because the velocity was too much for the matter we could see. But to me, I noticed that storms on earth with far less density and lower temperature matter like air (argon, oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen) can muster up tremendous power enough so they can fight gravity and even atmospheric pressure. So the galaxy works the same way. Heat chases cold absolutely and black holes (center of a galaxy) are absolute zero temperature mocking a low pressure center with air. So highly charged energy will attest to the common center just like a galaxy has highly charged stars and gaseous masses swirl around Sagittarius A star here in our Milky Way. The small gives us a glimpse into the MACRO. Go put up a firepit and get it lit real good (safely) of course, and you’ll notice it will charge up and chase a cold dense stick. Just put a stick near the pit and see the fire light up and chase the dense mass. So in a vacuum without atmospheric pressure caving in on the fire it will chase even more. So that means our missing DARK MATTER is really storm force. Heat and cold attracting. ☺️💯☑️ the hot charged part of the galaxy chases the cold center in a circle or elliptical pattern. Cycles. 💡💥💯

    • @Eaglepass
      @Eaglepass 7 месяцев назад +2

      Manifold

    • @JKDVIPER
      @JKDVIPER 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@Eaglepass yup. Pretty much. A more inspired way of looking at it.

    • @LukeRiedler
      @LukeRiedler 7 месяцев назад

      wait, why is this making me think of this girl I met? hmmmmmm, interesting. Anyway, well written, seems to be speaking to a number of people.

  • @Steven-ff4wl
    @Steven-ff4wl 6 месяцев назад +9

    Click bait.

    • @stevenmoore3480
      @stevenmoore3480 3 месяца назад +1

      it's basically all we've got now

    • @mrx1278
      @mrx1278 3 месяца назад

      How so Stev?

    • @stevenmoore3480
      @stevenmoore3480 3 месяца назад +1

      @@mrx1278 you cannot sell anything now without lying about what it is you are actually going to get for your time or money...

    • @mrx1278
      @mrx1278 3 месяца назад +1

      @@stevenmoore3480 oh....

    • @Steven-ff4wl
      @Steven-ff4wl 3 месяца назад

      @@mrx1278 It's nonsense.

  • @Uyytrdf
    @Uyytrdf 7 месяцев назад +1

    I especially like the way this video explains facts we know which within the first minute or 2 led me to realize that a fractal can be used to extrapolate an unknown barrier or zone and some of its limitations because a fractal will yield a shape or geometry to deduce the disturbance of the constant before and after the zone of uncertainty - based on the rate of fractalization scalar from known zone to unknown zone in function and in ratio thereby deducing the geometry (such as past a black hole or other side of one or a singularity or white hole quantum singularity )

  • @jackfroste
    @jackfroste 7 месяцев назад +1

    Very nice summary of the complex topics of Chaos Theory.

  • @Pendragon981
    @Pendragon981 6 месяцев назад +1

    I think of the Chaos Theory as proof there is some form of intelligent design, just not in any way that we can fully understand. It truly takes humility and clarity to even hope to begin to understand even a fraction of the hidden designs in even the most simplistic of things.

    • @ws775
      @ws775 5 месяцев назад

      Open theism?

  • @BossInVegas
    @BossInVegas 7 месяцев назад +3

    this channel is legit underrated with only 76k subs because it puts out content of substance and not just the same 'float through the planets' with narrator voice on top typical space related channels.

    • @origenjerome8031
      @origenjerome8031 7 месяцев назад +4

      We are just watching some random stitched videos of stock footages though.

    • @johnr2391
      @johnr2391 7 месяцев назад

      This channel is legit shit you mean

  • @JMazzaTaz
    @JMazzaTaz 7 месяцев назад +5

    If you ever see a turtle on top of a fence post, it’s a safe bet that it didn’t get there by itself. The more you know….

  • @Just_A_Kid5693
    @Just_A_Kid5693 5 месяцев назад +2

    Me:*moves chair*
    The theory: the world will end

  • @TimHoefer
    @TimHoefer 6 месяцев назад +1

    3:20 Just because it's a random starting point, doesn't mean the system itself is random. There are inherent constraints due to the rules (pick the point that is halfway between the current point and one of three static points). Once the second point is selected, every other point is literally relative to (and constrained by) A, B, and C anchor points.

    • @McCucumber
      @McCucumber 6 месяцев назад

      Wow but you have to be a really good drawer to make those lines so perfect like that. It's only works if you're a really good drawer or with a computer that does it for you.

    • @McCucumber
      @McCucumber 6 месяцев назад

      Go see if you got a ruler you can measure it out and make sure the dots are the same distance apart and use the ruler as a straight edge to to make them straight I guess you could do with that way.

  • @EmeraldEyesEsoteric
    @EmeraldEyesEsoteric 7 месяцев назад +3

    The dots don't have anywhere to go except for three choices though. The Triforce was not mysterious shape as his reaction would led to believe, rather it was inevitable.

    • @lechatquilit
      @lechatquilit 7 месяцев назад

      It's not a triforce -- it's The Sierpinski Triangle. It's a fractal shape, that arises in many places in the fractal geometry and in chaos theory.
      And there was nothing inevitable about this: if you were asked ahead of time what shape the process would give rise to, you wouldn't have been able to answer.

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад

      Anyone with a logical mind could predict this as there are areas that never will receive a dot.@@lechatquilit

  • @beeftimer
    @beeftimer 7 месяцев назад +3

    Uhhhh... Butterfly effect applies for either theory, as does cause and effect - it's just that a certain cause will always happen to cause its respective effect if it's deterministic.‚

    • @Vile_Entity_3545
      @Vile_Entity_3545 7 месяцев назад

      How many acid tabs have you taken?

    • @ichimaruvegeta
      @ichimaruvegeta 7 месяцев назад

      Correlation doesn’t always imply causation though.

    • @Willy_Tepes
      @Willy_Tepes 7 месяцев назад +1

      I have observed the butterfly effect in practice through my many years of commenting on the web. One sentence from me has spread into minds I never thought possible just by chance. You do have the power to change the world even without meaning it. Imagine what you can do when you realize your power. People can be influenced, and people do stuff ;)

    • @beeftimer
      @beeftimer 7 месяцев назад

      @@Willy_Tepes ummm, okay. Cool! Good for you, man

    • @beeftimer
      @beeftimer 7 месяцев назад

      @@ichimaruvegeta Ok? What do you people think I'm saying?

  • @Noganrhy
    @Noganrhy 7 месяцев назад +2

    For some reason I feel like this video made me understand blackholes a lot clearer.

  • @robvangessel3766
    @robvangessel3766 6 месяцев назад

    The tragedy is that human beings aren't capable of seeing this as part of their daily lives. We are among the fragmentary dots, our senses evolved as they are likewise contained within those fragmentary dots. Limiting our perceptions. If it were otherwise, we'd have a sixth sense. A "meta"-sense, that would allow us to perceive the chain of cause-and-effect originating from any point (like the butterfly). If we could do that, we wouldn't be destroying our ecosystems. We would instinctively invest in their natural functions for our long-term survival. It wouldn't be just about "living for the moment" hoarding.

  • @sandytrunks
    @sandytrunks 7 месяцев назад +4

    @0:08 "This may sound like a joke or something, but trust me..." Ah! You lost me there, mate. I don't even know you and you're asking me to trust you already?

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 7 месяцев назад +1

      And only 20 seconds later comes the first mistake, the butterfly effect isn't "probabilistic".

    • @nftherula.
      @nftherula. 5 месяцев назад

      faccs

    • @donnievance1942
      @donnievance1942 5 месяцев назад

      @@Nonononono_Ohno Correct. The Butterfly Effect is simply a statement about the uncomputability of any complex, deterministic system beyond some relatively near horizon. However, the video makes that clear. You are constructing a strawman based on your own misunderstanding of what was being said.

    • @Nonononono_Ohno
      @Nonononono_Ohno 5 месяцев назад

      @@donnievance1942 Your comment only shows that you have not been listening to, or understood, what is being said in the video. But I cannot blame you, with all that drivel. In the video we hear that "In the probabilistic mode, our universe unfolds with an element of chance. Small, seemingly insignificant events like the butterfly's wings cancascade into significant unpredictable consequences." This shows that whichever language model constructed this video erroneously "thinks" that the butterfly effect is "probabilistic mode". This is false.

  • @jackcarvis3668
    @jackcarvis3668 7 месяцев назад +3

    Does this work for all shapes

  • @mattcommons5392
    @mattcommons5392 6 месяцев назад +1

    Our existence is everything, as well as nothing. In our 3rd universe there is an infinite amount of possibilities that have already existed, as well as nothing that has ever existed. This is just in the 3D existence that we're capable of understanding. When you get into the higher dimensions, like 4d, where time isn't a factor anymore, we'll start to understand more how everything is just everything.

  • @yashmishra6624
    @yashmishra6624 5 месяцев назад

    The real heroism (and utility) is in determining the perfect picture of reality at any point in time. The good news is that it is indeed possible.