Ahead of SC judgment, all you need to know about Articles 370 & 35A

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 дек 2024

Комментарии • 122

  • @ThePrintIndia
    @ThePrintIndia  Год назад +1

    Exclusive content, privileges & more - Subscribe to ThePrint for special benefits: theprint.in/subscribe/

    • @Peace-vs9yi
      @Peace-vs9yi Год назад

      Please make one video on why Sunni Muslims and Shia muslims fight against each other..

  • @BharatThatIsIndia
    @BharatThatIsIndia Год назад +33

    I think the SC decision will be -
    1. Abrogation of article 370 is legal.
    2. Making J&K a Union Territory is not legal and it should be turned into a state with immediate effect or der should be a date by which J&K should be converted as state.
    3. 35A will be removed as per the Indian constitution.

    • @ytskt
      @ytskt Год назад

      2 won't happen so quickly, SC has too many things in stake apart from it's not so great public perception, the biggest one being the illegal hijacking of SC by collegium system, the shameless nepotism which leads to corruption and millions of pending cases...

    • @grsumathi
      @grsumathi Год назад +2

      So be it

    • @arunb8841
      @arunb8841 Год назад +3

      Are you an astrologer or what?😅😂

    • @grsumathi
      @grsumathi Год назад +4

      @@arunb8841
      👍🤣
      His predictions came true!!

    • @BharatThatIsIndia
      @BharatThatIsIndia Год назад +2

      @@arunb8841 😂😂 This was expected. SC has to balance National Interest and People rights along with not embarrassing the Indian Government (as it has international significance).
      I am only disappointed that SC should have asked for a particular date to restore statehood.
      Near future or temporary can be 1 year, 10 year or 100 year.
      Apart from that SC decision was best in the national interest.

  • @vaidyasethuraman452
    @vaidyasethuraman452 Год назад +20

    If SC overturns abrogation of Art 370 that is the final nail in the coffin of democracy and equality of people regardless of their beliefs.

    • @megharaj4989
      @megharaj4989 Год назад

      If something like that happens, it'll greatly affect trust on SC

  • @allembrace
    @allembrace Год назад +20

    ARTICLE 370 in KASHMIR violates SC/ ST rights, WOMENS rights, and all human rights of equality, equal laws, equal treatment.

    • @prasadkg0
      @prasadkg0 Год назад

      Ok congress chamcha 😂😂😂

    • @arjunsingh-du2tn
      @arjunsingh-du2tn Год назад

      But is print wale chutiye buddhe ko kon batyega congress ki gaand chatne walo ki gand main dard Hora is buddhe ki Tarah.

  • @Smiling-Monk
    @Smiling-Monk Год назад +16

    Why Nobody Talking about Maharashtra Thane ISIS CELL Burst 🧐🧐

  • @watanabe00738
    @watanabe00738 Год назад +30

    Thank you SC in advance for not siding with Separatists. ❤❤

    • @arunb8841
      @arunb8841 Год назад

      You're right now...😅😂

    • @watanabe00738
      @watanabe00738 Год назад +1

      @@arunb8841 😉 we are smart

  • @sankalp6872
    @sankalp6872 Год назад +25

    I hope SC takes a holistic view of the matter. Special status to J&K violates the basic principle of Equality. I hope it does not come to the Modi Govt bulldozing an SC order. Such a move will benefit the BJP politically but will keep the debate boiling for years to come.

    • @Insightful_Truth
      @Insightful_Truth Год назад

      Modi cannot bulldoz SC order because 370 is constitutional provision. An ordinance cannot change or remove 370 from constitution. It needs constitutional amendment

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g Год назад +6

      ​@@Insightful_Truthif congress bullboze shahbanu SC verdict then why not 370?

    • @Insightful_Truth
      @Insightful_Truth Год назад

      @@dev7155g shahbanu was not part of the Constitution

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g Год назад +1

      @@Insightful_Truth it's was part of SC judgement

    • @ytskt
      @ytskt Год назад

      ​@@Insightful_Truth370 is still part of the constitution, it's just that special treatment of one particular religious group based on a supremacist agenda is nullified.
      Also, SC has too many things in stake apart from it's quickly deteriorating public perception among the Indians, the biggest one being the illegal hijacking of SC by collegium system, the shameless nepotism which leads to corruption and millions of pending cases...

  • @mohansankar2262
    @mohansankar2262 Год назад +12

    Nothing doing . 100% it will be in favour of Bharath .

  • @girishdesai2868
    @girishdesai2868 Год назад +15

    You are cleverly equating spl status under Art. 370 with spl status under other Articles. But there are lot of difference between Art. 370 and other Articles.

  • @ranjitpal9937
    @ranjitpal9937 Год назад +5

    Shekhar Ji , You Rock in This Blazer 👌 Cheer's for Modi Ji as He will Take Advantage of Scraping of Article 35A 🍷

  • @Star-ds4sd
    @Star-ds4sd Год назад +8

    Thank You for Clearing the Clutter on Sec 35A & 370 . Modi will Amend it for Sure and In Jan Next Parliament Election Will Be Announced

  • @Rajesh-lv2gt
    @Rajesh-lv2gt Год назад

    Thanks!

    • @ThePrintIndia
      @ThePrintIndia  Год назад

      Dear Rajesh,
      Thank you for supporting ThePrint's journalism.

  • @deepthoughts5919
    @deepthoughts5919 Год назад +5

    If a Kashmiri can settle in my state for economic advantage , my people can also settle in Kashmir fr the reason of their choice!

  • @abhissri6666
    @abhissri6666 Год назад +7

    Building news and narrative since the time gupta has been employed by congress - completely silent on Dhiraj Sahu

  • @shivakumariyer7805
    @shivakumariyer7805 Год назад +1

    Thanks for clearing the clutter.

  • @egg-h4b
    @egg-h4b Год назад +6

    I have followed the live sessions of SC on this case, and never for once I saw the bench giving any hints or convinced that the abrogation could be illegal. On most occasions the bench was convinced with the argument presented by the government. So I think the decision will be in favor of the government that the abrogation is 100% legal. However I feel the bench will make some comments on the hush-hush way it was done, and may 'advice' the government not to do such things in future.

    • @mantrachhaya6835
      @mantrachhaya6835 Год назад +2

      Yes they were infact puzzled by what Mr kapil sibal were saying, and kept asking him about how 370 had become part of basic structure of constitution.... So I think that the way govt. Removed will be addressed and they will uphold abrogation of 370...

  • @sanjaypriyadarshi
    @sanjaypriyadarshi Год назад +3

    It's done and dusted...What max SC can do is to ask the center for a free and fair state election.

  • @Life.is.a.library
    @Life.is.a.library Год назад +2

    Shekhar said Kashmiris are unhappy about it, when would they ever be happy about anything.

  • @Peace-vs9yi
    @Peace-vs9yi Год назад +10

    Please make one video on sunni muslims versus shia muslims and why they hate each other...

    • @hirakjyotibarman2291
      @hirakjyotibarman2291 Год назад +10

      They may hate each other but they hate kafirs equally and dream the same dream of Islamic state.. So nothing to gain from such a discussion..

    • @Peace-vs9yi
      @Peace-vs9yi Год назад

      @@hirakjyotibarman2291 but bringing that information out is very important to all other kafirs. We Kafirs should know their sects(basically caste) n how different sects function as their beliefs differ within them.
      Because Britishers, Christians n Islamists knew about our system they utilised it.

    • @knowall5792
      @knowall5792 Год назад

      He may not do it because either way he may antagonize one of the groups.

  • @sharveshbarath1556
    @sharveshbarath1556 Год назад +3

    My opinion is if article 370 restore, indian government and indian people should kick out kashmir from india.

    • @Insightful_Truth
      @Insightful_Truth Год назад +2

      Why would india kick out it's own territory?

    • @rajnair1357
      @rajnair1357 Год назад +2

      Yes,the separatists and soft separatists will be kicked out of Kashmir

    • @nousername1587
      @nousername1587 Год назад +1

      Kick out separatists and Jihadis*

  • @manteshsharma9351
    @manteshsharma9351 Год назад

    And here after 4 and a half years..
    SC has given its verdict..
    Who could have thought... Who could have ever thought..

  • @atanuroy8405
    @atanuroy8405 Год назад

    This order is win for the Indian sovereignty and a great knock to separatists within the nation

  • @tapemaj
    @tapemaj Год назад +4

    Why running an old presentation ?
    Let’s await the SC order in 2023 .
    J & K ought to be in India 🇮🇳 without any issues at all .

  • @ravisathya7718
    @ravisathya7718 Год назад +2

    Thanks Shekhar Gupta,
    Being paid agent of Congress, ISI and China. You have done a great job for them. I request you to do good to your mother land.by highlighting about Sahu his money and his relationship with your employer ., Congress.
    Thanks

  • @ravieswararao7080
    @ravieswararao7080 Год назад +5

    Shekhar you are congress man

  • @AshwaniKumarAggarwal-w3j
    @AshwaniKumarAggarwal-w3j Год назад +1

    ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Article 370 gave India only a limited say in the affairs of Jammu and Kashmir , including Ladakh , which suited both China and Pakistan .
    China was always a player in the so called Kashmir dispute overtly only between India and Pakistan. China wanted Ladakh to link up with Pakistan and Shaksgam valley . State Govt of Jammu and Kashmir , including Ladakh , was sympathetic to Pakistan ‘s and ultimately to China ‘s interests , especially , in Ladakh. Example Late Sheikh Abdullah refused to allow His Holiness The Dalai Lama and his followers to settle in Ladakh when they took refuge in India . Ladakh was most suitable for Tibetans both from climate and cultural points of views. Sheikh Abdullah allowed anf financially helped Uyghur Muslims to settle in Kashmir .
    India ‘s direct control over both Kashmir and Ladakh has put an end to the China - Pakistani collusion . Present standoff in Ladakh is a joint China- Pakistan conspiracy. Now ,China fears losing Tibet and Aksai Chin and Pakistan losing Gilgit and Baltistan ,,,,,,,

  • @kartzs9957
    @kartzs9957 Год назад +1

    U missed key points on subisidies etc 🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️🤷🏽‍♂️
    Using other states tax money .. for what fun ???
    Are they not abled ppl ?? 🤷🏽‍♂️🙄🙄🙄

  • @sujathachandrasekaran1997
    @sujathachandrasekaran1997 Год назад

    Waste of public money and judiciary time , which can be better used.

  • @smahajan3675
    @smahajan3675 11 месяцев назад

    Art 370 is very different from Art 371. Both cannot be equated.J&K is very different from Kashmir. Also due to Art 35A no development took place in J&K due to no industrialist able to purchase land.

  • @jijilr
    @jijilr Год назад

    Nehru had thought about it. He even had shared it with Edvina. So he gets credit for abrogation of article 370.

  • @MayankKumar-bt7of
    @MayankKumar-bt7of Год назад +1

    Kashmiris are not unhappy about it 😂 what sweeping propaganda statements does Gupta ji think he can get away with?

  • @vipenkhullar
    @vipenkhullar Год назад

    Article 370 has inherent provisions to take on amendments which are conclusive by Law of land .

  • @bhargavvenn
    @bhargavvenn Год назад

    Shekhar decided to dress like a lawyer

  • @KSS8517
    @KSS8517 Год назад +1

    Mr. Gupta, I agree that people from other states are not allowed to settle down in J and K. But you have not uttered a single word on Kashmiri Pundits who were chased away from J and K. The Pundits themselves cannot settle down in their native state. Agreed you are a Congress stooge, but even for you this is low. Rectify your thinking.
    Also, as I am writing, SC has upheld the abrogation of 370. So Mr. Gupta delete this clipping...

  • @arjunsingh-du2tn
    @arjunsingh-du2tn Год назад +1

    Don't make fool of people how it is not ok by parliament, parliament is Supreme in every democracy.

  • @Tinjinladakh
    @Tinjinladakh Год назад +5

    I am from Ladakh, removing Articles 370 do more harm then good to our Ladakhi society

    • @ranjitpal9937
      @ranjitpal9937 Год назад +6

      Infosys , India Hotel & FII etc Can invest in Ladak as in Mainland India without Any legal Complications 🍷

    • @Tinjinladakh
      @Tinjinladakh Год назад

      outsider taking all our local jobs, taking over local shops, restaurant and malls, hindus religion in ladakh and creating hate between muslim anf buddist community, hindus people throwing garbage plastic hindus god where we drink and cook from that water, you people have destroy ganga and yamuna river, now hindus destroying our only source of water to drink, cook, @@Jun_kid

    • @dev7155g
      @dev7155g Год назад

      Lauda bhi fark nahi padta, Nation security first

    • @megharaj4989
      @megharaj4989 Год назад +1

      ​@@Jun_kidleave ladhak, tieing up ladhak with Kashmir has been a big Blunder for ladhak

  • @sanjaypriyadarshi
    @sanjaypriyadarshi Год назад +2

    You failed to explain properly

  • @punnavanamsubbiah7434
    @punnavanamsubbiah7434 Год назад

    Death nail to commitment promise given by GOI to join with India. Dassaratha promise to Kaigaiyee and floting the promise made Rama in forest for 14 years.

  • @s.damodarreddy9396
    @s.damodarreddy9396 Год назад

    Sir, constitution is for the people. People are not for the constitution.

  • @adas19581024
    @adas19581024 Год назад +2

    My take whatever be the judgement, modi gains either way. Narrative will be built easily according to the judgement.

  • @syamkrishnanharidas1625
    @syamkrishnanharidas1625 11 месяцев назад

    Art 370 gone .so the credibility of sg

  • @ankitasingh1276
    @ankitasingh1276 Год назад

    Hi - sec 35 A is creating a confusion. It will be Article 35 A

  • @PankajGupta-df1kk
    @PankajGupta-df1kk Год назад

    So both must go.

  • @sanatan8091
    @sanatan8091 Год назад

    Meltdown 😂

  • @anantgupta9658
    @anantgupta9658 Год назад

    How about Indians cannot live in Kashmir ? Had hai.

  • @RaviKumar-wi2ce
    @RaviKumar-wi2ce Год назад +2

    यदि नेहरू धारा 370 के लिए जिम्मेदार थे तो निश्चित रूप से नेहरू के कारण ही जम्मू कश्मीर भारत का हिस्सा बना...कृपया इसे न भूलें """

    • @sumeettanwar1608
      @sumeettanwar1608 Год назад

      Lol yeah right. Sardar Patel is the reason India exist and if he had been pm as he was choosen by the people we won't even had this problem to begin with.
      Gandhi and nehru screwed India and it's future generations.

  • @UnfilteredVibes-g1b
    @UnfilteredVibes-g1b Год назад +1

  • @mg.f.9023
    @mg.f.9023 Год назад +1

    Very well explained.

  • @ShreyasJBalaji
    @ShreyasJBalaji Год назад

    Only one state in India has special status. Others have special category status, I guess.

    • @pacificfinder
      @pacificfinder Год назад +1

      There are other states with special status but they are logically miniscule compared to what JnK had, it was something very very different.
      It's like A gets a Gold coin, B gets an Iron coin and we say both got Metal Coins.

  • @YaseenPatel-o1d
    @YaseenPatel-o1d Год назад

    Special Provision vs special status, vasudev didn't know law and constituition how it should be Interpreted ,but who knows laws all over the world knows what it means and so therefore abrogation of article 370 was illegal and unconstituition in my view it will be restored

    • @doncorleone3901
      @doncorleone3901 Год назад +1

      What good will it do to you if this is restored? Genuinely curious

    • @YaseenPatel-o1d
      @YaseenPatel-o1d Год назад

      @@doncorleone3901 upholding the constitution and protecting any malpractices happens in a future (read UN resolution on Kashmir)Thank you

    • @doncorleone3901
      @doncorleone3901 Год назад

      @user-cf3cr8ki7e so malpractices and so called upholding constitution is not happening in other states in this country? Only Kashmir has special needs that must be protected? Why are you people like this? Why only you manufacture problems that nobody does?

    • @YaseenPatel-o1d
      @YaseenPatel-o1d Год назад

      @@doncorleone3901 if someone breaks a law, there is a remedy for it,according to constituition

  • @ShivaramKNV
    @ShivaramKNV Год назад

    This was great sir. So nicely articulated 🙏

  • @KhmeIfucan
    @KhmeIfucan Год назад

    First Sg video not praising or protecting bjp

  • @harshupandit91198
    @harshupandit91198 Год назад

    👍

  • @krishnanramakrishnan472
    @krishnanramakrishnan472 Год назад

    Dare you

  • @MirzaUday
    @MirzaUday Год назад

    Sir, in this formal attire you look like Miguel Angel Felix gallardo from Narcos Mexico.

    Just try wearing a gucci sunglasses next time.

  • @Mu_sA19
    @Mu_sA19 Год назад +1

    🫶

  • @southpole4776
    @southpole4776 Год назад

    Presidents rule needed in gaumutra states

    • @rollsroyce4249
      @rollsroyce4249 Год назад +12

      None of them exist in India. I don't know about your "mental state"

    • @Artrader_em8ko
      @Artrader_em8ko Год назад +12

      As a South Indian, I request you to not be a hater!

    • @southpole4776
      @southpole4776 Год назад

      @@Artrader_em8ko gaumutra states earned the hate. They are not peaceful people

    • @Peace-vs9yi
      @Peace-vs9yi Год назад +5

      ​@@southpole4776why Sunni muslims and Shia muslims fight in Tamil Nadu?

    • @YM-wp6me
      @YM-wp6me Год назад

      @@southpole4776 and what according to you are “peaceful people”, if I may ask ?

  • @magma9000
    @magma9000 Год назад +1

    WORLD SHOULD PRESSURE INDIA TO FREE INDIAN OCCUPIED KASHMIR