Timorebestia - The Giant Cambrian Worms
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- Cambrian ecosystems over 500 million years ago were the first time where large multicellular life on earth came to prominence, and with all of the diversity of the time, it figures that all these millions of years later we’d still be finding many new animals to this day, and that has indeed continued to be the case.
One of these animals described recently is Timorebestia koprii, their name meaning fear-causing beast in latin, and their species name being named after the Korea Polar Research Institute, or KOPRI after their support and ongoing assistance regarding the field expeditions in the regions.
I hope you enjoy.
Background music:
Deepspace - Audionautix
Bright Idea - Geographer
Make sure to like and subscribe to learn more about our wonderful world!
Sources:
www.sci.news/p...
www.science.or...
en.wikipedia.o...
/ unveiling-the-giants-o...
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
All video/game content is recorded and edited under fair use rights for reasons of commentary and social satire.
It would appear that I am early. Can’t wait to learn more about funky ancient organisms
Cambrian animals are so cool! Always awesome to discover a new species
Please take this as positive criticism: I'd be very helpful if you put Latin (and even common) names on the screen bc I actually couldn't understand you. English is not my native language, and Latin is no one's so writing things down is best for those of us who want to look the taxa up! Otherwise great vid, keep up the good work!
English is my first language and it was difficult for me as well lol
I wouldn't venture to describe these as "worms" - but then again, there are significantly less worm-like animals that are also called worms, so I'm not sure what to make of it.
I've been following your channel for a while and wanted to say your narration has improved, keep up the good work on your descriptive ancient organism videos. I'd like to see videos on ancient plants as well, it's something I don't know much about but very curious about.
They are braver than me, climbing that slippery shale slope so high up in the mountains; gives me goosebumps just seeing the picture...though the rewards are very high too.
I wonder if these are perhaps an ancestor of the radiodonts.
These are chaetognaths, which are in Spiralia. Radiodonts are basal arthropods, thus Ecdysozoa, thus very distant from each other.
They definitely had some convergence with radiodonts, the basic shape reminds me a lot of Anomalocaris
A wonderful way to start my day
Keep up the good work!
They still around
These are literal Spore Cell level characters.
ty
Oh my Meih
Dig those worms :)
WTF Cambrian Explosion?
1:56 "... to clay [sic] together ..."? "clade together"? "Clade" is a noun.
0:19 "... in north Greenlands [sic] ..."? "Greenland"
Hey Henry The PaleoGuy, why don’t you get to think of a suggestion and creating a RUclips Videos all about the Amphicyons (Bear Dogs) coming up next?!⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️👍👍👍👍👍
0:36 "... with there being varying clarities [sic] ..." -- "clarity" is not a count noun -- there is no such word as "clarities".
Ditch the crappy AI writing please.
Well there are some big sciency words in there, but that can't be helped, lol
nice video
I like critters
Can't wait to learn more about this thing on Worm Week.
the thing's thoughts might be illuminating
wow!
As is its wont, RUclips has arbitrarily removed half my comments. There's a problem when you make so many grammatical errors in just the first two minutes of a video. There is no such place as "Greenlands" and "clade" is a noun, not a verb (if that's what you said -- it sounded like "clay").
P.S. Now RUclips has removed yet another of my posts -- got to keep the number of consecutive ones fixed at two apparently. At 0:23, I distinctly heard you say "... were describes [sic] ..." -- the past participle of "describe" is "described".
0:23 "... were describes [sic] ..."?!? "described"!
Fascinating.