I am aware of this. I have seen the same in Das & Pal book. But it is definitely wrong concept wise, although the answer turns out to be same in both the cases.
When we are integrating length components over a given interval it is becoming a surface area. I have missed writing the units at the end of the problems, but I hope they are understandable 👍
Excellent. Proud to be your teacher.
Thank you sir for your blessings 🙏🏻
Super excellent teaching
I understood clearly . Tommorow I have sem exam...... Thank u
Welcome ✌️
This was very helpful to study for my final!
That's great!
❤amazing
@@Mahesh-rd6if Thank you 😊
Aise visualization bahut rare milta hai
@@Mahesh-rd6if Thank you for the motivation 😊
Thanks a lot for the explanation, Sir! 😇
Welcome
Awesome 😎👍
Thank you
Thankyou ❤
Nice Explanation 👍
Thank you
it helped a lot sir ...thanks
Welcome
Sir please upload a video on Green's Theorem
Okay
@@rbmaths thankyou sir
clearly understood
Great!
thank you very much
Welcome!
Sir gauss divergence theorem please
I have already uploaded a video on divergence theorem. Please check the Integral Calculus playlist.
Thanks for n^ explain
ds=r.dr.d0 but you have written ds = d0. dz. Please explain sir(0=theta)
@@AmanKumar-rk1dg Here r=1 as radius is 1.
In some books n is taken as k in case of paraboloid
I am aware of this. I have seen the same in Das & Pal book. But it is definitely wrong concept wise, although the answer turns out to be same in both the cases.
Sir thora aur pehlye aye hotye😇
BS, a length is not equal to a surface area. Why do you not include the units?
When we are integrating length components over a given interval it is becoming a surface area. I have missed writing the units at the end of the problems, but I hope they are understandable 👍