Warp Drive and Aliens: Bryan Gaensler Public Lecture
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2020
- In his live public lecture at Perimeter Institute on February 5, 2020, astronomer Bryan Gaensler (Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Toronto) explored the latest thinking on interstellar travel and on the search for alien life - including why he believes the frontiers of current research may be more exciting and visionary than any fictional stories we can imagine.
Perimeter Institute (charitable registration number 88981 4323 RR0001) is the world’s largest independent research hub devoted to theoretical physics, created to foster breakthroughs in the fundamental understanding of our universe, from the smallest particles to the entire cosmos. The Perimeter Institute Public Lecture Series is made possible in part by the support of donors like you. Be part of the equation: perimeterinstitute.ca/inspiri...
Subscribe for updates on future live webcasts, events, free posters, and more: insidetheperimeter.ca/newslet...
pioutreach
perimeter
perimeterinstitute
Donate: perimeterinstitute.ca/give-today 
Наука
This was recorded on my 50th birthday so thank you! One thing I'd like to point out about UFO's that Mr. Gaensler wholly neglects to consider is that while yes, we do have cell phones with somewhat decent cameras, they are mainly designed for close up shots and not distance. It is also very difficult, if not impossible, to focus them on small objects that are far away, and especially anything in bad lighting or at night. For example, watch a plane fly by up in the sky and try and get a good picture of it. It is difficult if not impossible even under good conditions.
Secondly, most of the recent incidents of the last two decades that have been tracked by the military and also seen by commercial pilots are often over the ocean and or at very high altitudes. Lastly, we cannot just dismiss what is actual recorded evidence by the military and pilots including radar records of objects moving in and then back out of our atmosphere at extreme speeds that we humans are not nearly capable of. There is in fact a lot of evidence that cannot be easily shrugged off.
While some events can of course be explained by professional skeptics such as Mick West, there are still many more events which cannot be simply dismissed as "anomalies". And to be clear, it's very disturbing that people like this, people who are apparently smart and dedicated to their profession, would so quickly and wantonly dismiss such incidents simply because it's not really within their area of study (when in fact it kinda, sorta actually is lol).
My point is that these may just be the droids we are looking for. And just because we haven't figured everything out yet, it doesn't mean other potentially advanced civilizations who could have a million-year jump or more of evolution over us...already have figured things out. Just like how we are exploring Mars with what is essentially a drone, so could an advanced civilization explore us with super-advanced drones, possibly ones that are completely autonomous free-thinking AI that have developed over tens of thousands of years.
Think about what we have accomplished just in the last 50 years with technology and now add 1,000 or 100,000 years to that and think where we could be. Therefore we simply cannot rule out the possibility, however extreme and unimaginable, that in various places of our galaxy we may have neighbors who are doing or have already done the same and much greater. It is estimated that there are 100 Billion or more Red Dwarf stars in our Galaxy. There's quite a lot of potential out there. So I say.. let’s keep the faith!
Bravo
Well said. I'm sure you're well aware of the multitude of reasons why people like this can't just come out and say that UFO's are everything we imagine them to be and then some.
Just because you "see" something on RADAR does not mean that it's a solid object. RADARs can be spoofed and this is a common military tactic. It wouldn't surprise me if many of the "UFOs" were actually Russian aircraft playing wargames during the cold war.
@@kimchristensen2175 So visual contact means nothing to you?
@@kimchristensen2175 you really need to look at modern military radar and sonor technology as opposed to anything 60+ years ago. There is substantial evidence, only a small fraction of which was released about the 2004 F-18 incidents and others since then, but if you also take the time to listen to their accounts and the others since then you get a much bigger picture of the much larger powderkeg of data the US military is sitting on. And no, it’s definitely not the Russians or Chinese. No country on the planet has multiple craft that can come in from space, down to sea level in mere seconds, and then back up and out again. Nope. They tracked this stuff for weeks. Multiple events. Its not just some anomaly to fit in with people’s safe space. Sorry, but no.
I'm an author on the LIGO project. The explosion did not shake the universe afterward. The vibration is what's recorded just before the two neutron stars or black holes joined. This is the result of the two bodies rotating around each other as they get closer and closer. Right afterward, there is no vibration and no gravitational waves are produced from an explosion.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 Yes, I was there at the beginning of the LIGO project. I designed the 7 pick-off telescopes and the end mass telescope of the system.
I designed the optics housing for analysis of the return beam from the ultra-flat mirror at the end of the right angled vacuum tubes. I also designed the device that calibrated the flatness of the return mirrors, a process that took over a week to analyze.
I interchanged concepts and engineering data with several physicists at Caltech.
Therefore, please tell me your qualifications to question my integrity and expertise on this subject! Maybe you should read my book, Infinity, Time, Death and Thought should your intellectual capacity be capable of absorbing the information.
Would you be referring to mass cancellation sir.
you can't really blame them too much Ivan (not), They are from Ontario Canada and have their own brand of science up there. Cheers
Sir, Do you mean when neutron stars collide or black holes collide , they do not generate gravitational waves ??
No, he means that they do not explode. And the gravitational waves are generated before they merge to gether. When they do merge they do not generete then in the same amplitude. Grav waves are produced by the interaction of 2 blacj holes. Not the actual merger. Make sense?@@ilimitless
Love this guy's simple, humble enthusiasm for his subject. Really nice lecture.
Ok z
M
L9
@@natasadzunko I
R GMV⅕75⁶
this lecture was real awesome, he really explained well how humans are behind in innovation to explore the universe
Lies again? Google Drive
We have only recently mastered fire. We still throw rocks at one another.
@@popi4486 m
From my understanding Aliens are using antigravity and they bend space like a fabric to shorten the distance from point A to point B, creating temporary wormholes to travel through. They may be interdimensional as well as interstellar.
@@Kierant2010 I've just watched The Action Lab channel do an experiment on quantum locking and I am very impressed, surely this can be used to generate clean energy?
How does this translate to space travel? Are you saying that the alien craft is a superconductor and space is the magnet?
What is your thoughts on Bob Lazar stating in the late 80s that element 115 is the fuel to these craft?
Look up the pais effect by salvatore pais and your theory will change
riiight - the Aliens must like to watch American sci-fi on Netflix...
Yes I believe this to be true as well..from a physics-based perspective its the only plausible explanation. Reply to project EDEN
@@Revo2011 alien Craft is a superconductor and space IS the magnet?
After seeing a ufo 10 years ago, I feel annoyed that your answer to the question "yes, no, maybe?" was just a flat out 'no' it says a lot. My own experience was like a movie but it lasted 3 seconds. The 'flying saucer' I saw was being chased or followed by two fighter jets barely keeping up. It was a clear sky, bright blue mid day. But as everyone knows it's not an everyday occurrence to see what I saw. SO no I didn't have time to take any picture even though at the time I had an iPhone and could have if I was't in shock. It just happened all too quickly for me to react fast enough.
Keep banging the rocks together guy's.
I am so thankful for astronomers! I cannot explore every interest I have, but I can be joyful about the discoveries of others! Thank you!
Good perspective. +1
Well said Wendy X
I used to write articles for the website of a semi-government org that funded "science projects". I got to go to presentations like this all the time and was so enthralled sometimes that I had to keep reminding myself to take notes and do my job. This guy's truly great. The audience is lucky.
Ahhhh the ancient glory days: A lecture room densely packed with people.
Sadly people ruined it with licking windows.
Sigh...true, true.
Ah yes, rooms packed with dense people
Its not fake, I have seen it myself.
A brainwashing room packed with brainwashed fools uncapable of critical thinking!
Yesss, A movie of Rendezvous with Rama.... Really required.
Think I’ve learnt more in this one lecture than I have all year. Although we do have jet packs.
Very good presentation spoke about latest space technology and lay persons could understand and be inspired. Great video.
This is a renowned scientist. Might not be a good talker to many people but he knows what's going on and all the basic knowledge and recent facts/findings. We are lucky to have experts like them to explore/prove what we can dream of. Enjoyed the summary/brushup of modern astronomy. G'day from Downunder.
Science has been subverted and turned into a pyramid scheme pseudo-religion for Marxists to infiltrate academia, suckle at the public teat, and use funding for science to be subversive communist shit heads.
@@bashkillszombies Too bad you missed out on a proper education, but obviously got brainwashed by people with old cold war rethoric and propaganda. Perhaps a fan of Trumpism?
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252
I'm not talking about or defending this specific video, but was reacting on the wild generalistic accusations and framing by this reactionary dude towards science. The word 'Marxism' exposed him.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252
Blablabla.
Your experience is just anecdotal, the most inferior type of scientific evidence. The world's science community and all universities encompasses much more than your little pond.
Bytheway, your newest president is a lot wiser than that narcissistic clown before him. What an international embarressment Trump was... pfff
I know several American expats who are glad to have migrated to western Europe where I live. And I can totally understand them.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252
Your reaction is full of bias and hatred. You have no place in science.
Bye.
I al an astronomer ana professor of astronomy and i must say that i seldom listened to such a motivating talk. I shared the link with my students of the introduction to astrophysics course. Congratulations bryan, for tour enthusiasm your humble attitude and tour scientific rigor
Goodness. For a professor you sure don't spell too good.
@@Major_FaimOfficial yes .... I nave large fingers and a tiny keyboard...
@@GiuseppeLongotheastronomer ahh that explains it
Do you then start out with "try to be skeptical the most" ?
Or just merge with fantasy audience rhetorics?
I have nothing against the lecturer nor enthusiasm ,but more important is thorough examination of claims.
I am better off having seen this video. Thank you.
That being said, when I was in high school a loooong time ago I was shown a picture of an atom and told this is what it looks like.
Many years later...I came to understand that we didn't actually know what it looked like.
I felt a bit betrayed, and then reflected back on the absolute arrogance of the establishment.
Be vigilant. We don't know what we don't know so please be careful stating absolutes...
Thanks again. Really enjoyed.
So true. I feel the same way when I hear people say, “... is impossible because it violates the laws of physics”. The “laws” of physics. Aren’t most of those so called “laws” just theories? Even, arguably, the most important one isn’t even a “law”, “the theory of relativity”. The “Laws” of Physics are simply the theories of physics as we understand it “now”. If “we” are unwilling to think, design and function outside of the “laws of physics”, we will continue to stagnate instead of innovating and constantly making giant leaps in technology, advancing our civilization & species, in harmony with our galactic neighbors.
mund të vijë nga hionfxy ju unë yo nuk kam qenë në gjendje për të marrë paratë në riclpm tuaj ju nuk jeni ne iuyiiu tretyu n ppollllouieiro marrë një i mop
only an idiot believes in absolutes
@@painstruck01 a sith*
Laws and promises are made to be broken or we would not need either of those concepts.
Wonderful to see this very large and deep subject delivered in such a plain and easy to understand format. It requires great skill to explain complex matters in a clear and simple manner. Congratulations to Bryan
Simple lecture for simple minds.
Lame and conjecture
Pppp
yes superb
@@raaspider fc
This guy has a great way of lecturing! He is interesting and adds current hip stuff to show you what he means and he has a great flow! Amazing
by "current hip stuff" do you mean the irrelevant and off-topic virtue signaling?
Repent.
can’t wait to watch and listen and not understand anything
Honestly true lol. It's the reason it's so effective for me as sleep audio. It's soothing but doesn't distract me cause i understand jack shyte
Lmao same buddy
#relate hahaha
Just absorb and learn
@@theragemachineau3855 haha I’ll wake up one day a astrophysicist, I’m sure of it.
Fact ... 🤣
Bryan is a genuinely fantastic person, teacher, and speaker,
At this rate I am going to be an old man by time Alien disclosure happens.
The most ridiculous thing about SETI is excatly what the guy said, everybody is listening and nobody transmitting. Scientists are often very well educated but utterly stupid!
And more they are listening to a frequency we don't use ourself so why aliens would use it?
And another problem we use radio since only 100 years but we are using it less and less, radio/TV/internet and communications through fiber, very directive radio signals directed towards earth and so on. So very soon radio will become obsolete and only used for special purposes.
John Nolan.....the Pheonix Lights ship would be the Yah Yel from what i read on some video few years back...and apparently there could be a landing this year upcoming september(i been waiting bout 3 years by now)......just a little longer to see if it happen or not.....well Gov can try to cover up but if the Aliens choose to land they cant stop them from doing that...only downside is that i read they(the Yah Yel) are overwhelming kind(something that would drive me nuts as bathing in raw kindness is not my thing(i need that 5-15% of evil part for fun purpose(like ppl being slightly a jerk to me...prank on me....slightly arrogant...but not to the point of enraging me ofc XD))).....well despite that i'd love meeting them to learn more about life even if i have to endure too much kindness
@@johnnolan33177 I'm pretty sure the governments are keeping this low key because they are afraid humanity can't handle that we are being observed by aliens. It blows my mind that these astronomers are claiming to look for life all over the universe but fail to see alien life when it's right in our back yard .
I'll be dead so...
@@johnnolan33177 You won't go into all of what happened?
Sounds like your lying or you dont know what you saw.
Most people have never seen a rocket launch at night. When the rocket gets illuminated by the sun people say its magic or aliens or God.
And even when you explain what they're seeing they say its magic.
You can see rocket separation and RCS thrusters engaging and people still say its magic or aliens.
You can't just say "I saw a UFO".
You need to describe it in detail. At least try to sound honest.
If YOU are going to claim you saw aliens then it's on YOU to convince people you're not a liar or a moron.
This is an inspiring, yet fact driven presentation! I appreciate the fact that Dr Gaensler summarized where we are on interstellar traveling and finding life in the universe rather than just discussing theoretical physics and maths!
Thank you sooo much for summarizing it all for me!
Fact driven.
No
@@bathin813 if we followed your logic, we never would have found America.
@@boblarsen8301 that would have been a good thing. Billions of lives saved.
Excellent presenter! Very interesting and engaging topic. Thank you!
Solar sails? Do they really want the Aliens laughing at us? Lol.
I wanted to be an astronomer. However my poor lack of math skills made that impossible. I am grateful that I can get to listen to lectures on RUclips though.
Yeah, me too bro....I once told this professor the last time I saw a 90, was on my speedometer......
Same here.
Excuses.
Very interesting stuff! Thanks for sharing this on RUclips!
Ur new
Around the thirteen minute mark we get done with the usual aimless intros and ten minutes of the speaker talking about himself, his childhood and career.
Tubluer thanks for heads up!
TY :)
Thank You Sir
exactly why I paused it and came to the comments
I Was going to comment the same thing but using a less polite way of expressing it. It really does not improve much.
Professor Bryan, Outstanding, I really enjoyed your lecture.
Did you know he was an astronomer? Ffs I wish I could get past his self indulgent bs but eff off life’s too short
Teleportation of humans has a big problem: The person being "sent" is deconstructed (and thus killed), while the sent image, while perhaps a perfect reconstruction of the body of the "sent" person, will be a manufactured body, a different instance, either lifeless or a potential host for a different consciousness.
EXACTLY-- the physical is easy-- the ESSENCE is impossible!! WE are not our bodies-- and this failure to be able to transport- proves that we are NOT our bodies-- we're VERY MUCH MORE...
Glorious!
Thank you for the video, was a great job.
Repent.
Great lecture Thank you
What a sharp shooter , not one extra word than needed , well done sir
Think you got right to the heart of it there Gary - I'm real glad he is a great scientist and a great presenter and not a news anchor.
Very educational presentation for some people. Thank you 😎👍
I listen to a lot of documentories and this one is by far the best I have ever viewed. I learned meny things that I have pondered over and will watch it some more times to grasp some of the things I may have missed. Thank you for hosting this and binging it to the public eye.
Just started it, hopefully it lives up to your review!
Repent.
A book full of questions is better than a book full of answers. Great mathematician Ramanujan started his epic career after reading such a book as child
The eternal excuse among the d..mb
An excellent presentation.
I like that he is a dreamer. It is our dreams that drives our reality.
Manifest destiny
Darius Kang - 😹
@Phil Silverman The tech to get a human to alpha-centauri is soo very extreme, it is likely we will find other ways to achieve our goals (or find other more valuable ones) by the time civilization gets that advanced. While its a worthy attempt and will undoubtedly have important spinoff technologies (like Alchemy to Chemistry), the attempt to get a soft bodied creature like ourselves to the EXTREMELY violent high velocities needed for interstellar travel is even more crazy than the Alchemist desire to create gold from lead. You being hit by a grain of sand at those velocities is equivalent to a Hiroshima type nuclear bomb. In the 20th century, we "could" devote a quadrillion dollars to build particle accelerators to transmute a few grams of lead into gold, but it would be a huge waste of resources when we can do so much more interesting things with that technology that Alchemists never dreamed of. Along the same line, my feeling is by the time we have technologies which could make interstellar travel possible for humans, wasting our resources to create actually realize that would be silly. Long before we can rocket to the stars, we would have very advanced telescopes that will be able to allow us to virtually examine those worlds as if we were there, and possibly quantum supercomputers that can run simulations of an encounter with known aliens to 99.9999% accuracy, making the real thing quaint and unnecessary, and possibly also less valuable, intrusive, and dangerous. If our future culture desires or needs some form of intrusive agency on the universe (which is doubtful if any kind of prime directive is developed), we may be able to send out more "disruptive" probes or even our consciousness out into the universe through some complex electromagnetic soliton propagation that would be much more effective than sending our soft bodies. Who really knows, but whatever is the case, it is unlikely to be Star Trek or Star Wars, even if fantasies along those lines will allow us to the develop the more interesting and important stuff.
A "dream drive" sounds like a viable propulsion system
@@zackbarkley7593 the weird thing is that you believe in “outer space”.
Quoting Sagan on one of his greatest lines, in an astronomy lecture, without acknowledging him... that's just a no go.
Yea. Good lecture, but that bugged me too. Pay homage to our starbound dreamers who inspired us...
Noticed that too ;(
I felt more that by using the quote he was acknowledging Sagan.
For real I was like “hell ye--.... wait a minute... hmmm” how quickly one can cheapen a great lecture...
then I had reign in my judgy mind and realize that it’s probably an honest mistake.
Sagan was quoting aswell. It goes as far back as to the early 1920's...
Type of content I live for 🥰
I can't believe I made myself watch this whole thing! I learned exactly SQUAT !!!
I loved Salvation! Had great concepts, some cool science, and technology, such as the EM drive.
Me too - really enjoyed it
Repent.
This was really a cool talk. Wow!
Tesla referenced human energy 🌬👻jesus christ referenced living waters 💎👩🎓👨🎓science described water memory 🌊👩🎨👨🎨existence reflecting psychologically, psalms16:24 k,j proverbs 27:19👻💎👩🎓👨🎓💖🗽🤍🧮⚖🌪👩🎨👨🎨🌬
I saw a red light in the night sky a couple weeks ago. it slowly moved around in an odd way, after around a minute or two of this it shot off in a streak of white light. One of the most surreal things I’ve ever seen and immediately made me realise the reality of “science fiction”.. this shit really exists
You're right it does exist and our government has it and a bunch of other places have it Russia has it they can disappear you they can fucking go from one place they can teleport all right like I can prove it I can give you the information so you can find out for yourself
@@jamesanton5681 can you prove that punctuation exists
phoenix lights is really compelling cause thousands of people saw it
I honestly enjoyed the lecture, very impressed. I wonder how Professor Bryan would perceive Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and Unidentified Submerged Objects and Skinwalker Ranch in Uintah County? The world is taking photographs all the time now.
Wanted: Warp drive and alien theories.
Got: Comparison of Hollywood and reality.
Well PJ at least you found the place where they do exist.
you saved me an hour thanks
Every time people see a UFO, they tend to assume that our science fictions can become a reality sometime in the future - which are all based on the imaginations of science fiction writers - warp speed, teleportation, antigravity, green aliens and Captain Kirk
He spent maybe two minutes total on warp drives, lol
@@joekey8464 If the blue alien females look like the ones on Star Trek and Farscape I'm all in (and available).
1850 - Me: "In 2020 we can have billions of videos in one place and everybody on the planet can watch them in real time."
Man from 1850: What is the video?
500 A.D. - Me: "I can use this mobile device to record videos and to take photos, look!"
Man from 500 A.D.: "Stay back, DEMON!!!"
Keep in mind that ancient greece had developed a mathematical working model of our beautiful stationary flat Earth, the Antikathera mechanism 🙏 on the other hand the spinning balls doctrine is purely hypothetical and just simply pseudoscience. The gravity of the situation is that we have globezombie animal all around our beautiful stationary flat Earth
At least in 1850 we were free to do real things. Now we’re only free to watch videos.
@@AlwaysSunnyInBooTube Man from 500AD... hue hue hue, I can take picture of my junk!
Wish Feynman was still here to do a lecture like this. He was the best there was. His biography is a must read!
Agreed - But Professor Gaensler and Neil are doing a great job. And who can forget Carl. We can never forget Richard - but the wheel turns.
Feynman slaughtered hyper-equational esoterica in his own gentle ways. Just read his books
I like your honourable mention of the land owners. Respect to you.
He left one faster-than-light scheme out: traversable wormholes. It was strange that he didn't mention them, because he mentioned both Kip Thorne and the movie Contact, and not only were wormholes the method of FTL travel used in that film, but Thorne suggested it to Carl Sagan when Sagan wrote the book. Also, the "hyperspace" drive used in Star Wars is closer to the wormhole idea than it is to warp drive.
Heh. That ought to get all of five views, @Drugresearcher Kappalapa.
In order to travel through a worm hole, you need some kind of force field powerful enough to deflect the gravitational field that created the worm hole.
@@thishandleistacken The idea of creating a field bubble to push your craft through space is fascinating and maybe possible. The question is, could the craft handle the stress on the hill?
Shut up..your clueless
@@q09876543
That force with is created to pull,
Can be redirected to push, or deflect..
I like him he did a very good lecture a very educated man and very well spoken.
im finally using the internet in a way i can tell my kids about
Chapter time stamps?
3:10 start.
8:54 Arrival movie.
12:40 Oumuamua, asteroid from outside solar system.
I think arrival is a very good movie. Especially the circular time idea,is brilliant. A great show
15:30 the good shyt starts
Thank you.
I've seen that black hole before. It's on the cover of the Soundgarden album Superunkown.
Thank you
what I find annoying is that these speakers say "the most common type of planets in the universe are these hot Jupiters..." lets clarify the statement that these are the most common ones we have been able to find with the technology and techniques for planet hunting we are using right now. smaller woulds around larger stars are harder to detect via either transit or wobble methods.
Well when they talk about anything to do with space... they are talking about stuff we have been able to find with current technology and techniques. It's just common sense that's what they mean.
@@TheMasterashton People should learn to say what they mean. Especially when they are giving public talks. Precision in the use of language is important to avoid misunderstanding. Not everyone is aware of the limits of current technology and techniques. The most common type of planets in the Universe may not be hot Jupiters at all. As much as practically possible, every statement should be qualified with the degree of certainty with which we can expect that statement to be true.
@@MrAlRats with that thinking we should slap: With current day technology and understanding of the universe infornt of everything we say....
@@teaser6089 You are right. Since common sense is a rarity today with the general public. That has to be made clear to those that dropped out of highschool and never got post secondary training. Being smart also means you have to deal with "smartasses" that believe in conspiracy theories.
So sad for the human race. Maybe that's why the "Aliens" have left us alone, come back in a hundred thousand years and see if humans survived or what lifeforms if any are left besides bacteria.
@@jerrywatson1958 I think the reason Aliens left us alone is just: What do they have to gain, we have no technology they don't, I mean they can travel faster than light so well, they are more advanced. We have no special resources on our planet that couldn't be found elsewhere.
And if they can travel faster than light, it's reasonable to assume that they can make robots that are cheaper, faster and better in everywhere that humans for manual labour, so slavery is out of the question.
Aliens who sent Oumuamua be like, "You humans better catch our shit when we sling it into your solar system next time if you want in on the galactic federation."
Aliens.... "so they havent even achieve interplanetary civilization yet abd they already dream of war and rebellion in space ? What is wrong with these savages!"
Absolutely amazing talk. Thank you!
Great presentation. I like this guy. Might take him on my next trip to Andromeda.
Please, do. You have my enthusiastic support, I'll even release some air he can breathe along the way.
Do you have some vezon on you?
Who edited this lecture? 1:09:57 shows a full screen of some cartoon-like drawings then 1:10:03 zooms out when an actual image of an exo-solar-system is shown.
I didn't even watch that far (got boring pretty fast, because it's just facts that I already know).. thanks for the info, now I know I don't have to watch the whole thing.
@@larph7270 LMAO
I was super fascinated by this lecture and it blew me away when he said "about the size of Kitchener Waterloo" that city is 15m from my house! I had no idea the forefront of physics is taking place so close toy home. Canadas got some smart cookies I tell ya lol
This is so appropriate now that the James Webb observatory is finally about to be activated. We might well discover things like Dyson spheres where we once thought red giants were. As for space travel, 'folding space' might well be the key to interdimensional travel. In the higher dimensions, it's possible that even very distant objects are within easy reach.
I think you need to replace reading Aquinas with opening a book on actual science.
Great talk on the state of technology. Thanks.
Repent.
I love watching these actual science lectures and then mixing in some far fetched type stuff and it’s crazy how over the years it starts to get closer together. Science fiction is just science we have have not proved yet
Tesla referenced human energy 🌬👻jesus christ referenced living waters 💎👩🎓👨🎓science described water memory 🌊👩🎨👨🎨existence reflecting psychologically, psalms16:24 k,j proverbs 27:19👻💎👩🎓💖🗽🤍🧮⚖🌪👩🎨👨🎨🌬
When I was a kid, home computers and cell phones were sci fi. The best sci fi authors are actually pretty damn good scientists.
We put it in de field thus we create it
Soft disclosure
Science is your false god.
That was an awesome lecture and it answered many question I was curious about!
Professor Gaensler nails it. Clear understandings of why we cannot do this or that - but maybe we could do this other. Neil de Grasse Tyson - there' s a new kid on the block. I have my science heroes - and Bryan Gaensler has just become a senoir contender.
All the best to both of you - it's amazing work......
what gets me when I was doing more astronomy many thought of astrology, and always asked can you find our horoscope in the stars. I love astronomy as well.
It's a good thing he gave an introduction so you know you don't want to watch it.
I could literally listen to this man talk all day long-absolutely fascinating, and I appreciated the humor👏 Admittedly, I am a tad disappointed with his rather dismissive responses to questions regarding Aliens/UFO’s (and all but ignoring the possibility of a multidimensional universe and inter-dimensional travel) but hey, no one’s perfect right?🛸👽
So proud of their crazy ass building
It looks like it was made with shipping containers
Exceptional presentation, thank you!
A movie like this can be thought of as conjecture, or a hypothesis geared toward our needs.
In some sense, as Feynman had said, the scientific process can involve taking guess and working from there.
So, art can be a type of initial scientific process, I suppose
Well let me put it instead like this : Once you have innovated a functional system for a use in society, that is a kind of (figurative) art.
Before that you must be creative enough. But you must be able to translate that into something physical that actually relates to real nature.
If not ,it will never be an innovation.
On the side of that, you will have those esoterics who never actually developed anything but still want to tell the world how the functional and applied tech of others allegedly works. :)
It's like the high point of stubborn superstitions.
I can assure you that both SpaceX rockets and the NASA EM drive and the USSS...orbiter vessels had no use of the postmodern "physics" philosophers.
@@KibyNykraft Right. "Taking a guess" should and must include starting with agreed upon facts, first.
@@russchadwell Facts that are possible to verify for others ,so that anyone will make an investment and something is actually produced yes :)
@@KibyNykraft true!
Did you see The Europa Report, Bryan? That movie scared the crap out of me and was totally fascinating!
53:03 what an eye opener!
That’s the local area!
Wow we do have a big system locally than our smaller brown dwarf counterparts!!
...more of an eye-closer ;-)
Best eye-opener for this lecture is a couple of matchsticks.
My wife calls me Mr Dick when she's mad...
There is no such thing as The Laws Of Physics, there is only information you think you know, until your understanding evolves.
And Einstein was a Masonic wombat.
@@Tubluer He definitely was a thief because he stole relativity from Henry Poincare. www.researchgate.net/publication/276277587_Did_Einstein_cheat
There are the "Laws of Physics" you can't deny that. The only thing you can say is that we do not know them all and apparently we have visitors that know more than we do.
@@JayDAnderson You conflate Laws of Physics and Theoretical Physics, 2 different things. The first one has some elements empirically tested the second one - based on relativity, a mathematical transformation from planar coordinates into spherical ones - is an interpretation of a system of coordinates that was built with it, but doesn't really exist. What you can predict really is planar coordinates through convoluted spherical calculations. All the extrapolation in math made from there is at best a waste of time. If there was such a thing as aliens and you start talking Theoretical Physics to them, they would probably pee their pants.
@@bengrizzlyadams6187 I read the abstract and it was riddled with grammatical errors. That's a bit of a red flag.
If anyone wondering 21:28 is when the subject of this speech starts
It's unfortunate the presenter doesn't mention that Oumuamua changed in luminosity during it's transit by a large degree. Likely due to rotation and reflection off of its flat side but it does promote some fun speculation. I believe the image he showed of Oumuamua was computer generated and we didn't actually get any close up photos of it. I recommend watching interviews with Avi Loab, Harvard director of something that I can't remember. He's passionate about the topic and provides more detail.
Have you read his critics? Loeb. Do that first please.
What a superb lecture, easily the best and most enjoyable on you tube. Thank you so much Bryan!
Then this -^ Our education systems have very spotty results.
Repent.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 Repent.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252 Repent.
@@socialmeaslesinpartnership1252
If you’re going to repent, you should also read the Bible.
5:20 that book was released 1979 two years before the space shuttle. Crazy it shows the shuttle the arm it deploying payload into space.
The Canadarm program to develop the shuttle arm to be used for payload deployment and retrieval was put on contract by NASA in 1975, the basic concept for the arm, was shown in the project proposal that was submitted months earlier. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadarm
Great video! The audience looks very well fed. In more ways than one.
Three ways.
Fantastic lecture, one of the best things I've seen on RUclips.
Just because we have a theorem or law that accurately describes a phenomenon, doesn't necessarily mean it is a correct representation. They are merely best fits, and if they are wrong even slightly, it can lead us down paths that may seem logical, but still wrong.
Ex: Newton's laws describe accurately the motion of bodies in space to a point, but it took a complete shift in perception to get Einstein's relativity and special relativity.
Never stopped them before. The math for the Manhattan project relayed an answer that the reflux from the implosion would be infinite. But that never stopped them. Same with CERN, its an agreed theory that there's a tiny bit more matter than anti matter, and if there was even the same amount of antimatter as matter the whole universe would implode inwards on it's self. Yet... Here we are making antimatter.
Super cool a magnet and it levitates and can warp around the environment, less friction also so obviously it doesn't over heat and explode.
There is anti gravity technology that uses a stable isotope of element 115 as the fuel
A good, confident, very interesting lecture. 👍
The craft is pointed perpendicular to the magnetic field of whatever star they're launching from. Depending on the mass of the star they want to decelerate at (stellar braking), the craft will launch from a certain percentage BELOW the chromosphere of the 'launch star' which allows them to come to a stop near the center of the 'brake star' at the destination. Journeys originating from very high-mass stars to very low-mass stars are possible but not typically used routes because if you're propelling from the corona of the launch star as opposed to the interior, they have to give something up....speed. The crafts speed is subject to the stellar depth it launches from while also subject to the stopping power of the brake star they're arriving at, so as not to overshoot the target destination system (star).
I have to say this video was a bit of a let down. The title is "Warp Drive and Aliens" and all he really says about warp drives is "pfft. they'll probably never work".
Maybe because they won't? Reality is what it is and translation (either travel or communication) FTL is simply impossible, period. And if the physics didn't say that, the Fermi Objection would be strong evidence for it anyway. Because if it were possible, others long ago would have invented it, and they would already be not only here but everywhere.
@@oldionus actually it is far more plausible that he says, other scientists have figured out that literally the only issue for the last one he says won't work is that he mentioned an outdated version of the theory and the fact he forgot of they have found ways that might be able to create that effect
You are a good guy
I found this was quite educating and honestly he explained in such a simple way
@@oldionus you mistake possibility with capability
He says oumuamua is cigar shaped but we dont know that. It also has the same profile as a rotating disk.
....just got to the warp drive bit and was shocked that not even a basic prototype has been built.... I regret being an Aussie interested in this field of science considering the last ten years has been a witch burning trial for anyone who speaks it.
Kudos to you mate for putting your head up on this one.
I'm tempted to write what I know, but it would be a waste.... Science in this country is treated like an Amway salesman. Started designing a concept years ago, but as I said.... Witch burning very popular here still.
@@HallonyancatThe witch burners were not burning someone with ideas of development.
The witch burners were clergies who wanted to demonstrate power.
They picked "anyone" to burn with various excuses.
In Norway in the 1600s they executed as much as 1/5 of the population in some of the farm villages of 200 people.
This was to both anchor the might of christianity and to get rid of all paganism.
Of course much of the 1600s paganism was just as dumb as monotheism but less authoritarian
Great video!
The wait for him to actually start talking about warp drive warped my mind.
ha ha ha
The presenter made an error when he pronounced Dr. Miguel Alcubierre's surname; he mispronounced it as Alcubee-err which would be correct if the surname came from France. I have researched the origins of Alcubierre, and it's of Spanish origin, and in Spanish (I have learned to speak Spanish), the last vowel is always pronounced, thus Alcubierre is correctly pronounced Alcubee-err-eh.
There was also an omission in the presentation on the Alcubierre (pronounced Alcubee-err-eh) Drive; Dr. Alcubierre used Einstein's General Relativity (this is the theory that models gravity as a warping of space-time around an object with mass, and deals with accelerating frames of reference) partial differential mathematical model, to find a solution for the 1D (1 dimensional) case, to demonstrate that it's theoretically possible to generate a localized space-time warp field, to allow a star ship to travel without moving because it's the localized space-time warp field that can move faster than the speed of light, carrying the star ship within this field.
The idea for a localized space-time warp field that can travel faster than the speed of light, came from the Hyperinflationary model of the expansion of the Universe, worked out by theoretical physicists such as Dr Alan Guth. In this model, after the Big Bang the Universe's 'fabric' or framework of space-time expanded much faster than the speed of light. This was devised to explain why the Universe looks like the way it does as we currently see it. The basic idea is the faster than light expansion of space-time, allowed Quantum Mechanical fluctuations in the density of the energy-matter plasma mix to be 'locked in', and the initially 'grainy' texture of the varying density from vacuum to the energy-matter plasma mix expanded resulting in the current Universe, in which the energy-matter mix is not uniformly distributed throughout the Universe, but the energy-matter mix is localized into regions with vast voids in-between these localized regions. One good way to visualize this, is the 'soap bubble' Universe model, where the surface of the bubbles are the localized regions where the energy-matter mix is traced out as galaxies, and the space inside these bubbles are the vast dark voids, in which Astronomers have found no signs of any energy (i.e. no gamma rays, X-rays, Ultraviolet light, visible light, infra red light, radio waves) or matter at all.
ya a wee bit too self absorbed, as if everyone is there to hear his bio...
Um , I was face to face with a Grey 12/28/1995 4:30 am. I've been studying the subject of UFO's and aliens since 1974.. something has dramatically happened to cause a lot of the sightings to cease.
It didn't cease...
There are several types of grayish" beings and they are not all the same or all good....I have been visited by the emerther race wich is full of pure love and light and they are our watchers who have been protecting us since antiquity....they are our cosmic brothers and sisters...they look like the aka skinny bob vid on here...not sure what type of grey u came in contact with robert
well I don't know what everybody's talking about because there have literally been more documented UFO sightings and the last 7 years than in all of recorded human history.... from MY research.
not just mine though, look at the United States government!
they've put out some of the best most compelling evidence and now in June 2021 they're going to have to report to Congress on all their findings.
It was part of our pandemic stimulus bill lol That's America
@@Baliken100 they wont release Jack sh1t except maybe crumbs to try to get out of their 70+ year hole of lying to us....I have been personally visited by the emerther race and open contact will not happen until the mass majority are conscious of them and ready wich won't be until around 2030....then from 2030 to 2050 is open contact and intermingling between our races here....thats the deal made with gov and e.t
After seeing videos of the pilots that witnessed the so-called “tic tacs”, that apparently traveled about 60 miles in a second or two, why our physicists are not questioning their understanding of physics. It seems we are still denying the possibility that we don’t know all there is to know about the physics of this universe.
You make many valid points many of which I churned over in my own.
I actually think that extremely bright people don't like to acknowledge that they are no longer the sharpest tool in the box. Its an ego thing.
That was a long way of saying absolutely nothing
I studied for my phd at the University of Waterloo. It was a respectable institution back then. Speaking of 1987/8, and got a job as an RA in 1990. I think the decline set in exactly at the time they hired me.
I believe I understand what you are saying. I'll say it for you so shlt tube doesn't ghost you. The woke B.S is the end of science
@@whirledpeas3477Add christianity/new age cultists to that and you have a complete subversion / destruction of western world institutions.
Great lay person's lecture!
If the neutron stars colliding was "felt" through the entire universe - was that "shock wave" across the space time fabric at the speed of light such that it coincided with the visual observation of the neutron stars as they collided? Was the shock wave a gravitation force spike/notch tugging on the space/time fabric? Is this why you suggested a black hole was created momentarily? Why would gravity 'waves" propagate at the speed of light? Is there a connection therefore? Is the universe infinite in distance yet expanding at the same time? If so is a gravitation tug responsible for this accelerating expansion in all directions? Why is there no observable light based phenomena for this expansion force? Does phenomena in the universe share any similarities as we approach "infinitely" small and infinitely large phenomena? If so is there any commonality between black holes and this accelerating expansion force? Thanks.
Great questions and ones that I personally think have something to do with the foundations of reality. The waves from the colliding neutron stars must have been felt instantly through quantum entanglement, so there was no time delay and they were not travelling as such as light does. Just like if I held one end of a taught rope in Europe, and you held the other end in America, if I tugged the rope you would feel it instantly. Quantum entanglement I believe will unlock much more understanding into the reality of nature
Answer 1- It's a gravity wave, it moves a little slower than light, so you would actually pick it up first on the telescope, and later on the laser detectors that detect gravity waves. Quantum Entanglement has nothing to do with this Raz, we don't have any way to detect Quantum entanglement. John Bell made a great experiment, that is still not proof of it, though. Answer 2-The connection is all physical matter can only travel at the speed of light. To travel faster, one must warp space, like the Alcubierre equation, which is theoretical. Answer 3- The Universe is not infinite, it's expanding. According to Buddha, this is actually the 84th Big Bang. Answer 4- Dark Energy is responsible for the acceleration of physical matter beyond gravity. This is why we have Stars moving faster on the outer rims of galaxies. The Universe is expanding and accelerating the expansion, it's Newton's law of thermodynamics and Dark Energy. Answer 5- The light hasn't reached us yet. Answer 6-Black Holes are points of incredible mass, they don't speed up expansion, they are also too small to slow it down. It is Dark Energy that is responsible for the acceleration of expansion.
@@carloscastanheiro2933 the thing is, gravity doesn't travel. It is an effect on space time that we observe. If the universe is accelerating apart faster than the speed of light, this shows that it is not in effect travelling. Time is only subjective to us, in our frame of reference. So objects appear to be moving in time. But the true reality is everything is happening at once. This is what I'm referring to when I mention quantum entanglement, which is probably the wrong phrase for such a thing. My head starts to hurt thinking about such things, but they are fascinating none the less
@@carloscastanheiro2933 Thanks!
@@Razmatazuk Thanks! Another somewhat related question. What is the relation between trigonometry applied to 2D and 3D spaces and energy that tavels in waves that have angular velocity that is also described by trignometry? It seems that the metric space and the energy that travels within are part of the same phenomena or can be described the same way. If space and travel of energy are related does this somehow explain time and the space time fabric? Sorry for the amateur questions. I'm glad there is someone here that can answer these things in layman terms. Thanks in advance.
This scenario of a filled theatre for this subject matter seems unlikely. As unlikely as meeting alien life. The Perimeter Institute is very special. A special place on a special planet.
Fantastic lecture, hes so enthusiastic and nice. Hope to see a lot more of Prof Gaensler!
Great talk. I also am a SciFi lover. You also had towards the end of the StarGate the tv series, (which was never mentioned), they had wormholes and borrowed technology, they referred to as FTL ( Faster Than Light) drives. Also most these different space ships throughout science fiction, had force fields that provided protection from not just phaser and proton torpedoes, but provided a more practical protection, which was against those pesky dust particles.
Well. Most probably the C/Lightspeed barrier is a major obstacle ,and most people don't even understand what C describes, and how slow light actually is.
Primarily speed is defined from C, not the other way around.
To talk about light one must first understand the both photo-electric effect and then the General relativity (including where it contains some problems/contradictions).
Photons spends 30 000 earth years to travel along our own galaxy and 8 minutes from the Sun to us.
On the large scale that is a real donkey.
But in theory one could surpass it ,yet to know how one must know exactly what the problem with GR is, one must be very well studied in plasma physics and charge mechanics, and most don't/aren't.
Let me put it this way : The issue is not sorted by having an evening course in anthroposophy or having watched an american TV show, coming to the lab with a high school equation written on a weed rolling paper.
But you 'll find a whole lot of "believers" out there being the boy versions of "beliebers". You know ,boy band fans.
😎
James Webb is a year away from launch. And another 160 days extra, before the first pics arrive. Can't wait.
"Open, open, open..."
let's keep our fingers crossed
Lol
Really enjoyed this lecture, the question that I would have liked to ask is - do you think that AI would be able to solve many of the problems associated with warp drive development, and also detecting planets that could sustain life, and of course detecting aliens.
It was one of best treats I have had in my life todate
Yes, robots comunícate with each other for 3 yrs now. They follow INCREDIBLE programa and evolve at quantica speeds. We just need to feed them programa and data.
We detect aliens all the time. We don't need AI for that. There was just video of the United States navy encountering a UAP recently
@@marinaclarasanchezsuarez2905 The AI database builds on information from humans to begin with, which means that it is best at doing "ground work" and effectivizing communication.
That could be the dangerous or tiresome or expensive we would do less of.
There are some dangers with AI as well which the romantics seem to be too simplistic to fathom.
Not to exaggerate it of course.
This is always a problem with idealists
Thank you for acqknowledging my forefathers and mothers❤
star trek generations movie has a gravitational wave detected when a mad scientist destroys a sun to move the 'nexus'.
ya but Einstein theorized gravity waves before startrek was even thought of. the work of sci-fi would have had to have come before Einsteins theory.
@@xthe_moonx Sci Fi Writer Arthur Clarker invented the communication satellite.
@Hughmon Writes .....says a random jock who probably has sketchy bits of grasp on overall subject of physics. Unless if you can give the courtesy to demonstrate some well known equations to prove me otherwise, which i doubt it'll be the case LoL.