@@AzmaPutra-channel is the natural requency tagged to X1 or X2. For example can I say natural frequency omega_1 is the nautral frequency of degree of freedom x_1
Barny - No. Each natural frequency will determine the relation between x_1 and x_2. This relation will determine the ‘shape’ of the vibration at that particular natural frequency. So it is NOT omega_1 is for x_1 and omega_2 is for x_2.
Super!
Concise and clear. Really helpful to me.
nice sir. more easier to understand. keep it up!
Nice one.
Are the nautural freqency tagged to any of the motion?
For each natural frequency, the motion (or vibration shape) will be unique. We call it 'mode shape'.
@@AzmaPutra-channel is the natural requency tagged to X1 or X2.
For example can I say natural frequency omega_1 is the nautral frequency of degree of freedom x_1
Barny - No. Each natural frequency will determine the relation between x_1 and x_2. This relation will determine the ‘shape’ of the vibration at that particular natural frequency. So it is NOT omega_1 is for x_1 and omega_2 is for x_2.
@@AzmaPutra-channel wow thank you so much for your time. Very kind of you. 😚.
It was of great help!
can you teach analysis vibration control sir?
What is that in specific? passive vibration control?
@@AzmaPutra-channelyes sir. thank you for noticed me sir.
Is it the natural frequency that both of the omega we need to assume 1 and 2?
Yes. First and second natural freqs.
When w=2, why do you solve for x2 when the leading entry is x1
We assume x1=1, which means we 'normalise' all the amplitude with the amplitude of x1.
No explanation of equations development!!
Please refer this video ok: ruclips.net/video/u5mVhSC5-zE/видео.htmlsi=gVCWqpwZD9bGVK3A