Hi. The 5 pack has just arrived and I basically can’t “lock em” on the camera lenses. I can push it into both of the “arches” but only one at the time, I tried to push hard but I don’t wanna ruin the camera. It looks like it’s half a millimetre to small.
1s thanks for the vídeo,then i have one question...the vid you have the sun face to djio3 is not a good with some nd filter, any problem with that ND? Thanks again 😁
Flywoo offer a 7 pack, that includes a polariser, with a lower profile locking tab, and a better (magnetic closure) case - for a little over half the price. I think my set was around £30. I wouldn't say these are 'better than the rest'. Did you try any others?! Cool that you included some photography info. Good video.
I have tried the flywoo and while they are good they are not gorilla glass, these are more premium but that’s not to say they will deliver better results. But they could last longer ect.
@@MadRC I can assuage most fears here: I smashed the absolute bejeezus out of my set. Still all good. 👍🏻 Prices for these things are all over the place aren't they. Makes me think they're all from the same place, and you pay for the route they take to get to you.
@@big-smoke-rc There are some significant differences in filters that might not necessarily be immediately apparent; 1) As above, they are made from Gorilla glass, and although you might not have ever broken a filter, Gorilla glass is much, much stronger than regular glass. The O3 cameras are expensive, and the glass makes a serious difference in whether or not you're going to break your camera (or filter of course). Here is a quick demonstration in the difference: ruclips.net/user/shortstJWXjRgJH_4 . This adds to the cost because Gorilla glass is much more expensive to work with (mainly because it is so hard) 2) Because of the way the O3 camera was designed, inserting any filter into the little notches in the camera hood will wear the notches down over time. I have seen and extensively tested other filters, and after just a small number of swaps, they end up fitting noticeably looser, eventually not staying in well at all. This damage to your camera is permanent. These Camera Butter filters have had extensive work on the little connecting tabs to make sure they are chamfered and smoothed to reduce the wearing away of the camera notches. This saves your camera and also makes sure that the filters stay tight for as long as possible. This takes time, and the CNC work to make this happen is not trivial, and does cost more to do. 3) They are designed to fit tighter than other filters. Having a filter fall off in a crash (or in flight) could result in you losing your filter. That's bad because you have to buy more, but it could also ruin your footage. 4) The optics on these are better than every other O3 filter available. This took extensive testing and iteration. Camera Butter actually specializes in filters. So no, you're not just paying for shipping costs, you are getting a better, more carefully designed and better quality product that will actually save you money in the long run :)
@@lambrettaladUKIt's cheaper in the long run since they are much, much stronger. Plus they won't wreck your camera's filter mounting system nearly as quickly. Not even taking the optical quality into account.
When it comes to ND Filter for fpv i am feeling very ambivalent. Because the EIS and even Gyroflow/Reelsteady doesnt like Motion Blur, because Motion Blur cant be stabilized it results in very strange image "jitters", if i use EIS or Gyroflow/Reelsteady i set the Shutter speed to Auto and add Motion Blur in Post Processing via Davinci Resolve
If your motion is jerky, then you just need to set the shutter a tiny bit faster, usually 1/4x works well. If your flying is more smooth (eg cinematic flying), then you should be fine with 1/2x. The stabilization uses the gyro, not the image so as long as you don't have motion blur that is not in the direction of motion, it's fine. It's when you get jerkiness and vibrations and things that are not in the direction of travel, you end up with motion blur in those directions, but no motion (since it's been stabilized) . Otherwise, the motion blur doesn't affect the actual stabilization algorithm (since it uses the gyro)
These are amazing! I bought them two months ago! I’m using the UV as a protective lense. They’re holding really well, so much that I broke off my ND4 trying to remove it 😅😂
Hi. The 5 pack has just arrived and I basically can’t “lock em” on the camera lenses. I can push it into both of the “arches” but only one at the time, I tried to push hard but I don’t wanna ruin the camera. It looks like it’s half a millimetre to small.
@@Lil_rem ? No 💩 Sherlock. How is your comment going to do anything? You could have said “I like red colour and square plates” and that would give me as much as the comment you left which is nothing.
Sorry, but I still don't understand. At 07:56, the image looks fine, and at 08:28, after you install the ND filter, the image looks the same as it did at 07:56. I know that using a filter helps maintain motion blur, but is that all there is to it? I still dont get the point of ND filter if we can lower shutter speed and have the same result EXCEPT motion blur !
The ones for the Avata are made to be easy to put on/take off. Since FPV is a different use case (ie crashing!), they are made to stay on much better, plus are made from much stronger glass.
Sorry, but I still don't understand. At 07:56, the image looks fine, and at 08:28, after you install the ND filter, the image looks the same as it did at 07:56. I know that using a filter helps maintain motion blur, but is that all there is to it?
I'd like to state the obvious which no one really has ever addressed. Why are DJI FPV cameras so far behind their GPS drone technology? FPV is finally getting from DJI what they've offered five or six years ago with their camera drones. It doesn't seem like new technology.
The man with 45 thousand subscribers is more believable and more knowledgeable than the others with over 200,000 subscribers 👏.
Awesome review, Ian! Thanks! 😊
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
you are the best fpv youtuber, Ian👍. A comparison with other ND Filter sets would be nice.
Hi. The 5 pack has just arrived and I basically can’t “lock em” on the camera lenses.
I can push it into both of the “arches” but only one at the time, I tried to push hard but I don’t wanna ruin the camera. It looks like it’s half a millimetre to small.
Thanks for the video. Have you tested it's colour neutrality? I've read freewell's are colour neutral so it'd be good to know if these are too.
Can an ND filter make propellers on the video less visible ?
1s thanks for the vídeo,then i have one question...the vid you have the sun face to djio3 is not a good with some nd filter, any problem with that ND? Thanks again 😁
As it’s a double glass there can always be issues. Your never going to stop the affect fully but it was not bad bad in my tests.
awesome - watching footage at the end, that bando....... wow i want to go there!
Yea I wish I could get in there. There is actually live security in the place. It has constant patrols.
Flywoo offer a 7 pack, that includes a polariser, with a lower profile locking tab, and a better (magnetic closure) case - for a little over half the price. I think my set was around £30.
I wouldn't say these are 'better than the rest'. Did you try any others?!
Cool that you included some photography info. Good video.
I have tried the flywoo and while they are good they are not gorilla glass, these are more premium but that’s not to say they will deliver better results. But they could last longer ect.
@@MadRC I can assuage most fears here: I smashed the absolute bejeezus out of my set. Still all good. 👍🏻
Prices for these things are all over the place aren't they. Makes me think they're all from the same place, and you pay for the route they take to get to you.
@@big-smoke-rc There are some significant differences in filters that might not necessarily be immediately apparent; 1) As above, they are made from Gorilla glass, and although you might not have ever broken a filter, Gorilla glass is much, much stronger than regular glass. The O3 cameras are expensive, and the glass makes a serious difference in whether or not you're going to break your camera (or filter of course). Here is a quick demonstration in the difference: ruclips.net/user/shortstJWXjRgJH_4 . This adds to the cost because Gorilla glass is much more expensive to work with (mainly because it is so hard) 2) Because of the way the O3 camera was designed, inserting any filter into the little notches in the camera hood will wear the notches down over time. I have seen and extensively tested other filters, and after just a small number of swaps, they end up fitting noticeably looser, eventually not staying in well at all. This damage to your camera is permanent. These Camera Butter filters have had extensive work on the little connecting tabs to make sure they are chamfered and smoothed to reduce the wearing away of the camera notches. This saves your camera and also makes sure that the filters stay tight for as long as possible. This takes time, and the CNC work to make this happen is not trivial, and does cost more to do. 3) They are designed to fit tighter than other filters. Having a filter fall off in a crash (or in flight) could result in you losing your filter. That's bad because you have to buy more, but it could also ruin your footage. 4) The optics on these are better than every other O3 filter available. This took extensive testing and iteration. Camera Butter actually specializes in filters. So no, you're not just paying for shipping costs, you are getting a better, more carefully designed and better quality product that will actually save you money in the long run :)
That set is 50 quid now :(
@@lambrettaladUKIt's cheaper in the long run since they are much, much stronger. Plus they won't wreck your camera's filter mounting system nearly as quickly. Not even taking the optical quality into account.
For dji o3 nd filter, with one better?
When it comes to ND Filter for fpv i am feeling very ambivalent. Because the EIS and even Gyroflow/Reelsteady doesnt like Motion Blur, because Motion Blur cant be stabilized it results in very strange image "jitters", if i use EIS or Gyroflow/Reelsteady i set the Shutter speed to Auto and add Motion Blur in Post Processing via Davinci Resolve
If your motion is jerky, then you just need to set the shutter a tiny bit faster, usually 1/4x works well. If your flying is more smooth (eg cinematic flying), then you should be fine with 1/2x. The stabilization uses the gyro, not the image so as long as you don't have motion blur that is not in the direction of motion, it's fine. It's when you get jerkiness and vibrations and things that are not in the direction of travel, you end up with motion blur in those directions, but no motion (since it's been stabilized) . Otherwise, the motion blur doesn't affect the actual stabilization algorithm (since it uses the gyro)
These are amazing! I bought them two months ago! I’m using the UV as a protective lense. They’re holding really well, so much that I broke off my ND4 trying to remove it 😅😂
Hi. The 5 pack has just arrived and I basically can’t “lock em” on the camera lenses.
I can push it into both of the “arches” but only one at the time, I tried to push hard but I don’t wanna ruin the camera. It looks like it’s half a millimetre to small.
@@NONX01 I guess it depends there are maybe differences during manufacturing
@@Lil_rem ? No 💩 Sherlock. How is your comment going to do anything?
You could have said “I like red colour and square plates” and that would give me as much as the comment you left which is nothing.
Would clear be a good option just for protection?
Yes, that's what it's made for
Is that a silhouette of a new set of goggles on the caddxfpw website? The one with the X in the background?
Sorry, but I still don't understand. At 07:56, the image looks fine, and at 08:28, after you install the ND filter, the image looks the same as it did at 07:56. I know that using a filter helps maintain motion blur, but is that all there is to it? I still dont get the point of ND filter if we can lower shutter speed and have the same result EXCEPT motion blur !
Can anyone tell me how scratch resistant they are? And why the ones for the Avata are different than the ones for the O3 air unit?
The ones for the Avata are made to be easy to put on/take off. Since FPV is a different use case (ie crashing!), they are made to stay on much better, plus are made from much stronger glass.
Bravo
Sorry, but I still don't understand. At 07:56, the image looks fine, and at 08:28, after you install the ND filter, the image looks the same as it did at 07:56. I know that using a filter helps maintain motion blur, but is that all there is to it?
I'd like to state the obvious which no one really has ever addressed. Why are DJI FPV cameras so far behind their GPS drone technology? FPV is finally getting from DJI what they've offered five or six years ago with their camera drones. It doesn't seem like new technology.
Dude! It's I-S-O, three individual letters, and that's what it has always been. You aren't doing Camera Butter any favors...
Oh god I don’t care. If you don’t ISO in bloody in my world and most others heads so bugger off and bother someone who cares.