@@slobodanindic5216 I should have mentioned that Federer was the best player for me or in my opinion. Djokovic is still amazing but Federer had something special. AT LEAST IN MY OPINION.
@@slobodanindic5216 that's stupid. You have to take into account that the points system was reformed sometime ago. When Justine Henin scored over 8000 by the old system, that would be 16000 nowadays. Same with Federer. You can't just put things in comparison that are not comparable without being recalculated.
@@tolendoi123 Imagine you're arguably the 2nd greatest clay court player of all time if only the greatest clay court player wasn't standing in your way. Imagine that even past your golden years you take the player in his golden years to the absolute limits in a way that left many filling you were still the better player.
Unmatched, the Greatest player of all time. No man has EVER played remotely close to that, everything was out of this world, footwork, forehand, backhand, dropshot, slice, insane angles, polishing the lines, impossible shots... everything was godlike
you can rewatch ATP Master cup final from 2006 also. this game had so many amazing shots. it was like 2007 AO semi final against Roddick. this version of Federer is simply unplayable. I also liked the semi final against Nadal of this Turnament some amazing Fedal points.
And he did it, like most of his career, using a 90 square inch tank of a racket. If he'd switched to the bigger frame earlier who knows how many more titles he could have won.
@@tolendoi123anyone who says “nope” at the start of a statement should really have something solid to back up their toxicity, it’s a shame you just spouted nonsense. The greatest ever debate is still a debate, it’s not decided and not objectified
@@Bsmith806 24>22>20, Gold=Gold>Silver, 40>36>28… There’s too much solid evidence that the GOAT is not Federer, in fact, he’s not even second. It’s not toxic to state facts you know? Being the greatest is about numbers, this is an individual sport after all. I understand if it’s basketball or soccer, where some dude can win championships by sitting their butts on the bench but tennis is an individual sport . The debate is done😝
He was the reason why I watched tennis as a kid. After 2010, with the rise of Nadal and Djokovic, I lost interested. Today I watch it because of Alcaraz.
I don't need to watch anything, i can look up statistics and Federer doesn't lead in any of the most significant ones anymore, this peak level higher level nonsense doesn't matter, because this is determined by eye test, while poor statistical numbers cannot be argued with! Lol
Umm...no dear Fed fanboy it's not clear...if it was there wouldbe no arguments needed...while i do think Fed's 2006 was higher, it's only by a small margin...not clear as a day like you say...and no highlights will prove otherwise...
Federer 2006 was better, but not massively, 2011 Djokovic has only 2 contenders for me, 2006 Federer and 2010 Nadal. There’s nothing far better than 2011 Djokovic
Even though it's possible that he would be no.3 if they were all at their peak at the same time, but I don't think so and at the very least none of them would be a clear no.3.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegetenRoger would have been the clear 3 if they were at their peaks at the same time. Rafa in his teen was cooking Federer and pre prime Novak was competitive with prime Federer. Federer is great don’t get me wrong, but the true rivalry in tennis is Djodal.
There was no consistency in fed's game, that's just best points. He was often doing mistakes, plus he couldn't fight nadal except in Wimbledon and masters cup. So Novak was much more consistent in this occasion and he fought both of his big rivals. Tennis evaluated much more than this flat tennis in 2006. There are no short angles, nothing in this fed's game. It's beautiful to watch, but not so effective game. Anyone who says this is better than Novak in 2011 or 2015, has no idea what tennis is, and never played tennis as real competitive sport.
92-5 for 2006 season...and reached all four major finals in 2006, winning three of them. No consistency? lol I don't even know why i bother with Noletards... The fact that you have delpotro as your profile pic says everything... a known one dimensional shotmaker. As for the part where you say that there are no short angles, I would assume you having played "moonball" tennis you'd understand that fast courts take away time, thus angles are less likely, yet Federer hit incredible angles in his era, not good, but INCREDIBLE hell some are even in this video, the skill it takes to get Federer's spin on a 90sq inch frame on super fast courts on both FH/BH is legendary, and he is THE BEST of all time at it. To put it in laymens terms, the best version of federer completely dismantles rafa and novak, They're not even in the game. The way Novak and Rafa beat federer is by wasting time and getting him off rhythm with oncourt bs.
@@pac0re It's before tennis evolution, plus a lot of 250 atps and seriously.. watch full matches, you will see he made so much points with serve and every second or third points its in the net. Rallies from 1 to 3 shots, so nadal and Nole they play different kind of tennis with baseline rallies and short angles and topspin. Younare just blind geeks who never really tried tennis in real life as a competition. Maybe only as full amateurs, so hope you will open your eyes some day. If not, stay blinded.
@@juanmartindelpotro685 I don't really care who you consider to be the best, but it is ridiculous to suggest prime Federer had no consistency. It's like me saying prime Novak has now power in his strokes, it's not their best attribute but they're certainly still elite in this category to everyone else. Also the majority of points end within 4 shots, so it's strange to criticize Roger for being very good at winning short points.
Some points vs Blake at USO 2006 were copyright 🙁🙁 Still I hope you guys enjoy!!
92-5 W/L record 😱😱 .. he. Only lost 4 matches to Nadal and 1 match to Murray whole year ... Impossible to recreate ... What a beast.
Edited
92-5
Ano správně 92win a 5 lost
Federer in his prime was just the best player of all time.
At least in my opinion. I am glad i saw him live twice here in Germany.
When was that?
@@slobodanindic5216 several years ago i have to admitt. Probably 2015 oder even a little earlier. Why?
@@Sathonys666😂😂😂Have u ever watched tennis?Novak had 16.950 as nobody ever.And that year Federer was in his prime.
@@slobodanindic5216 I should have mentioned that Federer was the best player for me or in my opinion.
Djokovic is still amazing but Federer had something special. AT LEAST IN MY OPINION.
@@slobodanindic5216 that's stupid. You have to take into account that the points system was reformed sometime ago. When Justine Henin scored over 8000 by the old system, that would be 16000 nowadays. Same with Federer. You can't just put things in comparison that are not comparable without being recalculated.
The greatest season ever. He created so many shots and made them look so easy.
Lost to Nadal 3x… more like easiest season ever.
@@tolendoi123 doesn’t even make sense. Try again lil bro
@@unowen7591 Oh it makes sense, you just don’t want to accept it. It’s not a disrespect to be the third greatest of all time.
@@tolendoi123 shut up
@@tolendoi123 Imagine you're arguably the 2nd greatest clay court player of all time if only the greatest clay court player wasn't standing in your way. Imagine that even past your golden years you take the player in his golden years to the absolute limits in a way that left many filling you were still the better player.
Roger Best, Talented, Versatile player... So far nobody can touch 😂
@@AngelaVaz-oe1lh Except Djokovic!!!
Unmatched, the Greatest player of all time. No man has EVER played remotely close to that, everything was out of this world, footwork, forehand, backhand, dropshot, slice, insane angles, polishing the lines, impossible shots... everything was godlike
Roger's prime was out of this world, unreachable for anyone
The best. variety, suprise, footwork. but his volleys are amazing
I remember those early Federer years. Like my youth, I thought the Fed's level would last forever.
Oh yess. Remember those days. Beat tennis ever❤❤❤❤
I dont care how many majors these new guys win, no one is like fed
Bravo - Bravo .
Roger ( 2016 ) Would Beat Roger ( 2006 ) in My Opinion..
you can rewatch ATP Master cup final from 2006 also. this game had so many amazing shots. it was like 2007 AO semi final against Roddick. this version of Federer is simply unplayable.
I also liked the semi final against Nadal of this Turnament some amazing Fedal points.
And he did it, like most of his career, using a 90 square inch tank of a racket. If he'd switched to the bigger frame earlier who knows how many more titles he could have won.
Yeah RF 2006 is the GOAT !!
Nope. Not when the guy who beat him three times that year is also in the GOAT contention… actually, GOAT debate has been ended by Novak.
@@tolendoi123anyone who says “nope” at the start of a statement should really have something solid to back up their toxicity, it’s a shame you just spouted nonsense. The greatest ever debate is still a debate, it’s not decided and not objectified
@@Bsmith806 24>22>20, Gold=Gold>Silver, 40>36>28… There’s too much solid evidence that the GOAT is not Federer, in fact, he’s not even second. It’s not toxic to state facts you know? Being the greatest is about numbers, this is an individual sport after all. I understand if it’s basketball or soccer, where some dude can win championships by sitting their butts on the bench but tennis is an individual sport . The debate is done😝
@@tolendoi123God you Djokovic fanboys are insufferable
@@unowen7591 Only to Federer fans
He was the reason why I watched tennis as a kid. After 2010, with the rise of Nadal and Djokovic, I lost interested. Today I watch it because of Alcaraz.
fed 2006 was the best player ever
It's kinda funny how the stats do not reflect that...
@@SebastianBielen67986 It’s very funny when the other guy in the GOAT contention aka Nadal, cooked him 4 times that year.
@@tolendoi123 both are goated fed 2006 on hard courts was best hard court player while nadal on clay was best clay plaer
If I were you I would add a few points from the match with Blake at the ATP Finals and something from Wimbledon. He had some spectacular shots there.
2:12 with that serve motion I thought it was Andy Murray!
New tennis fans say djokovic the goat. But they need to watch Fed in his prime. 2006.
I don't need to watch anything, i can look up statistics and Federer doesn't lead in any of the most significant ones anymore, this peak level higher level nonsense doesn't matter, because this is determined by eye test, while poor statistical numbers cannot be argued with! Lol
Sorry mean't "pure" not "poor" but whatever...
Beating nobodies like Blake and Davydenko but highest level achieved una 🥶🥶🥶🥶
Prime djokovic is so much better
To be honest 2011 djoko is the best ever
And finally Djokovic is coming 😅
U forgot 2007 Rogers Cup,vs Novak!When Federer had 6 set points on his serve and lost that set and match also!😂Just a mister 40-15!
Watch highlights of Federer's 2006 and Nole's 2011 season. It's clear as day Federer is/ was the better player by far.
Umm...no dear Fed fanboy it's not clear...if it was there wouldbe no arguments needed...while i do think Fed's 2006 was higher, it's only by a small margin...not clear as a day like you say...and no highlights will prove otherwise...
Weak era merchant beating bozos like Blake and Davydenko and Weakerarer tards think it's the highest level ever achieved 😂😂😂😂😂
You could argue Roger 2006 is better than Novak 2011, but you can not honestly think the difference is "clear as day".
Federer 2006 was better, but not massively, 2011 Djokovic has only 2 contenders for me, 2006 Federer and 2010 Nadal. There’s nothing far better than 2011 Djokovic
2006 Federer vs Nadal 2-4
2011 Djokovic vs Nadal: 6-0
No contest
Is the uploader blind? This is definitely not the highest level ever lol
Weak era merchant. Would've been owned by Rafole and be clear no. 3 if Rafole were the same age as him.
Even though it's possible that he would be no.3 if they were all at their peak at the same time, but I don't think so and at the very least none of them would be a clear no.3.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegetenRoger would have been the clear 3 if they were at their peaks at the same time. Rafa in his teen was cooking Federer and pre prime Novak was competitive with prime Federer. Federer is great don’t get me wrong, but the true rivalry in tennis is Djodal.
Well more like a combination of great talent and weak competition. Young Rafa dominated him that year by beating him three times…
There was no consistency in fed's game, that's just best points. He was often doing mistakes, plus he couldn't fight nadal except in Wimbledon and masters cup. So Novak was much more consistent in this occasion and he fought both of his big rivals. Tennis evaluated much more than this flat tennis in 2006. There are no short angles, nothing in this fed's game. It's beautiful to watch, but not so effective game. Anyone who says this is better than Novak in 2011 or 2015, has no idea what tennis is, and never played tennis as real competitive sport.
92-5 for 2006 season...and reached all four major finals in 2006, winning three of them. No consistency? lol I don't even know why i bother with Noletards... The fact that you have delpotro as your profile pic says everything... a known one dimensional shotmaker.
As for the part where you say that there are no short angles, I would assume you having played "moonball" tennis you'd understand that fast courts take away time, thus angles are less likely, yet Federer hit incredible angles in his era, not good, but INCREDIBLE hell some are even in this video, the skill it takes to get Federer's spin on a 90sq inch frame on super fast courts on both FH/BH is legendary, and he is THE BEST of all time at it. To put it in laymens terms, the best version of federer completely dismantles rafa and novak, They're not even in the game. The way Novak and Rafa beat federer is by wasting time and getting him off rhythm with oncourt bs.
@@pac0re It's before tennis evolution, plus a lot of 250 atps and seriously.. watch full matches, you will see he made so much points with serve and every second or third points its in the net. Rallies from 1 to 3 shots, so nadal and Nole they play different kind of tennis with baseline rallies and short angles and topspin. Younare just blind geeks who never really tried tennis in real life as a competition. Maybe only as full amateurs, so hope you will open your eyes some day. If not, stay blinded.
@@juanmartindelpotro685 I don't really care who you consider to be the best, but it is ridiculous to suggest prime Federer had no consistency. It's like me saying prime Novak has now power in his strokes, it's not their best attribute but they're certainly still elite in this category to everyone else. Also the majority of points end within 4 shots, so it's strange to criticize Roger for being very good at winning short points.
djokovic fans like numbers. In terms of numbers, Djokovic and Nadal never managed to have a season like Federer's in 2006. 92 wins and 5 losses.
@@tijgertjekonijnwordopgegeten
the guy comes to say that Federer had no consistency, losing 5 games a year hahaha hahahha
He didn't just win , he would dismantle the opponents
2015 Djokovic is better.