1950s CHINESE CIVIL WAR DOCUMENTARY MAO ZEDONG VS. CHIANG KAI-SHEK KMT VS CCP ARMY 88614

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 мар 2021
  • Hosted by Walter Cronkite, this fragmentary 1950s documentary is about the Chinese Civil War, between the Chinese Nationalist party - the Guomingdang (KMT) and the Chinese Communists (CCP), following the conclusion of WWII, and the war against the Japanese invasion of China, when the two sides were allied against a common enemy. It follows the Chinese Civil War to its conclusion in 1949 with the establishment of the People's Republic of China (the PRC ), and the evacuation of the KMT/ROC to Taiwan. It contains footage of Mao Zedong, Zhou Enlai, Lin Biao, Chang Cun, Chiang Kai-Shek, Gen. Marshall, interviews about the Chinese civil war and the possible future fate of China with U.S. Army Gen. Wedemeyer, Maj. Gen. Barr, Soong Meiling, and Pearl Buck.
    0:08-0:24 Demolished buildings, remains of a “New Pathé" cinema
    0:24 Remains of a bank office
    0:26 Map of the Republic of China with Beijing (Peiping) and Nanjing (Nanking) marked on it, area held by the CCP are marked with a star and Manchuria, held by the USSR is marked with the Soviet flag. China, August 1945
    0:44 Chang Kai-Shek in his Generalissimo uniform, and wife, Soong Meiling, at a rally in Nanjing, reading a speech at a microphone
    1:17 Fortified positions of the Chinese Communist Party in Yan'an, Shaanxi province
    1:22 Mao Zedong
    1:33 Possibly the reading of the Oath for joining the People's Army of the Republic of China
    1:44 Communist guerrillas on the march in the countryside
    1:45 and 1:55 An ROC soldier
    2:08-2:44 Battle footage, Communists vs KMT troops,
    2:27 A People's Army (CCP) troop (which is written on his straw hat) firing his automatic rifle, howitzers firing.
    2:46 Gen. George C. Marshall lands in Shanghai, 20th of December 1945
    2:59 Marshall meets with Chiang Kai-Shek and his staff
    3:07-3:36 US Consular residence in Nanjing, General Marshall peace talks with Zhou Enlai, a CCP representative, and Chang Chun, a KMT representative, June 21-23 1946
    3:42 The CCP capital of Yan'an,. Visit of Lady Isobel Cripps, British Relief Chairman and her meeting with Mao Zedong in 1946. People in an outdoors classroom. People looking at the 1949 wall newspaper (Dazibao)
    4:04 Land reform by the CCP - people berate a former KMT official. Mock execution by firing squad.
    4:35 CCP militia-style army - rifles but no uniforms
    4:50 KMT regular army clad in German materiel (KMT initially bought materiel and instruction from German advisors)
    5:00-5:50 Civil war restarts as Marshall's intervention fails.
    6:04 Map of China showing Chiang Kai-Shek's disastrous Northern March into the CCP-held territory.
    6:20-6:50 October 1947 - emergence of People's Liberation Army
    7:42 KMT General surrenders to the CCP troops.
    7:50 KMT prisoners
    7:55 Monetary inflation - people bringing bricks of money with them to the shops. CND to USD conversion goes from 1 to 3700 to 1 to 6000000.
    8:29 Protests against KMT, US military presence in Republic of China, and against the continued civil war. Women glueing stickers: "US made bombs are killing Chinese people" on a door. Young men are arrested and being led away by the police
    8:48 Arrival of the Gen. Albert C. Wedemeyer in July 1947, after Gen. Marshall's departure.9:00 Gen. Wedemeyer and Chiang Kai-Shek
    9:22 Mao Zedong and the Communist Central Committee meeting, at Yangchakou, Shaanxi, on December 25th 1947, Zhou Enlai .
    9:40-11:00 Battle and troop movement footage. PLA's taking of Suchow,
    11:10 Situational plan of the holdings of Chinese civil war sides for late 1948
    11:30-12:30 April 20th 1949, PLA crosses the Yangtse river on junks and improvised craft. Unsuccessful KMT artillery barrage.
    12:45 PLA taking the Nanjing Presidential Palace, Chiang Kai-Shek's portrait taken down13:00 Refugees fleeing
    13:41 Civil unrest in Shanghai May 1949, KMT police summarily executing a person on the street. People protesting.
    14:12 KMT police beating people with truncheons
    14:15 Foreign residents of Shanghai leaving,
    14:26 Oriental Overseas Line's (later Oriental Overseas Container Line) ship leaving Shanghai.
    14:47 PLA taking Shanghai May 14th 1949
    15:01 October 1st 1949 - establishment of the People's Republic of China, Mao Zedong, Lin Biao, Zhou Enlai, Song Qinling (wife of the late Sun Yat-sen)
    15:40 Chiang Kai-Shek in Taiwan
    16:05 interview with Maj. Gen. David G. Barr (skeptical of Chiang Kai Shek and the KMT forces)
    17:40 interviews with Gen. Albert C. Wedemeyer (more equanimous view)
    19:11 interview with Pearl Buck (writer, daugher of American missionaries, born in China)
    20:34 interview with Soong Meiling (Mme Chang Kai-shek)
    21:24 Conclusion
    This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD and 2k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFilm.com

Комментарии • 1,3 тыс.

  • @mr.cosmos5199
    @mr.cosmos5199 3 года назад +171

    “ the Chinese are superb people ,highly intelligent and original......make wonderful friends but fearful enemies “ Pearl Buck

    • @kshen7485
      @kshen7485 2 года назад +18

      Yes, nowadays CCP’s success stories have proved the correctness and truthfulness of her statement, no matter her honesty.

    • @kenmasters797
      @kenmasters797 2 года назад

      question..
      is china nowadays still as commies?

    • @kshen7485
      @kshen7485 2 года назад +17

      @@kenmasters797 nowadays Chinese don’t care, their philosophy is: “No matter what color, as long as cat can catch the mice, it is a good cat”. Americans have their proud “democracy”, but their infected and death toll of pandemic is ranking in the world no.1. Same as the “democratic” India and Brazil, aren’t they?

    • @kenmasters797
      @kenmasters797 2 года назад

      @@kshen7485
      so in other words is like is pk being big and the big one can get anything smaller...?
      ok i understand it now..
      i think most part of the world gets hit hard by the pandemic although they said the first infection sites was in china..
      even though i would still want the world at peace and free of the pandemic

    • @kshen7485
      @kshen7485 2 года назад +2

      @@kenmasters797 No, it happened 1st in the USA.
      Might be no conspiracy, at least the ignorance and negligence could be the root cause of nowadays American pandemic fatalities.
      “The respiratory outbreak” of Greenspring in Fairfax county ruclips.net/video/U02oKwsiyHM/видео.html (Video was published on July 12, 2019 by local TV CBS 17)
      Fairfax county is one hour away to the US army bio lab at Fort Detrick in Maryland.
      ruclips.net/video/pwpVcJj8dtA/видео.html ruclips.net/video/IVbv3rI7f94/видео.html ruclips.net/video/o_GhA7CCSMY/видео.html ruclips.net/video/GM-gzm_sOM0/видео.html ruclips.net/video/thqMeO_vGOQ/видео.html
      And later on the coverup and pointing the finger at China with “Chinese virus” would be the serious systematic political corruptions and crimes.

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 3 года назад +240

    History is always interesting.

    • @YuLum
      @YuLum 3 года назад +20

      And tragic

    • @lucisleesion8824
      @lucisleesion8824 3 года назад +5

      Yeah, of course.
      The PRC tried to reach out US ambassador. in Nanking, while President Truman said negative, which solely pushed China to the brace of USSR

    • @victor-hugedivitorilamas5802
      @victor-hugedivitorilamas5802 3 года назад

      @@lucisleesion8824 To be fair, Mao Zedong was an individualistic and treacherous leader with his allies and also a great douche when it came to ideology fanatism.

    • @khoocheepeng
      @khoocheepeng 3 года назад +8

      If those Japanese killed your grandfather and raped your grandmother, I don't think you want to used the word "interesting", my grandfather was killed by Japanese air bomb during 1942.

    • @glorych1168
      @glorych1168 3 года назад

      destiny of China since 1928 linked to USA.
      Truman abandoned chiang n roc doomed

  • @penlei003I
    @penlei003I 3 года назад +85

    The Yalta Conference, US Britain sells China's rights to the Soviet Union, cutting China's Mongolia, Hand over control of the three provinces of Northeast China to the Soviet Union. The rights of weak countries are used as bargaining chips for private exchanges by powerful countries。 So we decided to be a player, not a bargaining chip.

    • @ergouzz
      @ergouzz 2 года назад +5

      Great comment

    • @amubi
      @amubi 2 года назад +11

      Never trust any foreign country

    • @user-vx6qb4zh4h
      @user-vx6qb4zh4h 2 года назад

      朱元璋

    • @golonawailus4312
      @golonawailus4312 2 года назад +5

      best comment so far

    • @KnightofRave
      @KnightofRave 2 года назад

      Add what of the chairmen who now use proud chinese people as barganingn chips? Forcing them into a life of bitter servitude and silencing any who want for a pursuit of happiness or legitamite of the people democracy?
      All of this time you have been Played... player...

  • @Mondo762
    @Mondo762 3 года назад +219

    My earliest memories are of living on Taiwan as a US Army brat. This was 1953 - 1956. My father was an Army officer and we lived in the middle of the island in the Taichung area. I remember armored columns driving around the island and planes dropping leaflets. My father told me later on that Chiang Kai-shek was constantly threatening to invade the mainland. There was still shooting going on between some smaller islands and the mainland. I still have my fathers MAAG-Taiwan patch.

    • @ThePizzaGoblin
      @ThePizzaGoblin 3 года назад +10

      Whoah. That's wild. Thanks for sharing!

    • @user-wv4mf9pf8x
      @user-wv4mf9pf8x 2 года назад +2

      謝謝分享

    • @kshen7485
      @kshen7485 2 года назад +21

      @Glorious Me Yes, it was the trying to go back his motherland from Taiwan province.

    • @ryanpruner1853
      @ryanpruner1853 2 года назад +3

      they were probably just running drugs. wouldnt be surprised if chiang used that as an excuse to keep the gears turning

    • @andrewnorrie2731
      @andrewnorrie2731 2 года назад +11

      @Glorious Me Chiang may have thought so, but his US paymasters were not going to let him drag them into a war with China, especially after China set off its first atomic bomb. And Korea had not been the happiest experience for US forces.

  • @25leopoldaus9
    @25leopoldaus9 3 года назад +15

    Thank you!

  • @shishkababy733
    @shishkababy733 3 года назад +8

    Thank you 🙏🏻

  • @aostlund27
    @aostlund27 2 года назад +63

    My great grandfather was a Lt Colonel in the KMT. After the war ended, he fled to Hong Kong (which was British at the time), then Taiwan, then Japan, and lastly to the United States becoming a naturalized citizen at Ellis Island in 1952.

    • @mrsnufkinsan
      @mrsnufkinsan 2 года назад +1

      Wow!!!!

    • @ilpomelo
      @ilpomelo 2 года назад +1

      Before 1965 immigration of East Asians to the US was highly restricted with a quota of ~50 each year. How has he done that?

    • @aostlund27
      @aostlund27 2 года назад +5

      @@ilpomelo I’m not entirely sure and it’s not clear either, but I remember my great aunt saying that there was a distant relative that was living in NYC during that time and that’s how he eventually became a citizen of the USA

    • @user-dj3lo4iw2f
      @user-dj3lo4iw2f 2 года назад +9

      @@ilpomelo No, US was KMT's supporter. Many Chinese from Taiwan and Hong Kong emigrated to US at that time. Many rich Chinese and high rank officials moved to Taiwan with KMT. But Taiwan was too small for them, and KMT could not give them positions. Many of those people moved to US with their fortune from mainland China.

    • @chatter4427
      @chatter4427 Год назад +2

      A KMT soldier moving to Japan, pretty funny

  • @cheeseloop7777
    @cheeseloop7777 3 года назад +84

    Pearl S. Buck was so on point!

    • @mz0911
      @mz0911 3 года назад +9

      OMG this is the first time I saw her in a film

    • @robertnegron9706
      @robertnegron9706 3 года назад +3

      The Good Earth. Read that book.

    • @LilStoops
      @LilStoops 3 года назад +3

      According to Pearl, his qualities as a man was lacking. Wow, that's a message that would be 'problematic' for the people of today. But I suppose, when the proverbial hits the fan, that same mob will once again want capable men to step forward to save their collective skins.

    • @yanliew4027
      @yanliew4027 3 года назад +1

      according to Pearl Buck, the nationalist chief lack capability!

  • @esl2317
    @esl2317 3 года назад +47

    Later development:
    1950s CCP fought UN in Korea.
    1970s CCP fought US and USSR at the same time.
    1980s CCP help US weaken USSR.
    1990s I was born.
    2010s~20s CCP competes US in technology and economy.
    2021 I received my PhD and work in Shenzhen, mainland China.
    1950s KMT illegally invaded Thailand and Myanmar.
    1970s KMT lost its UN seat.
    1990s KMT and DPP argue whether the island is ROC or ROT.
    2010s KMT lost forever to DPP.
    2020s DPP accuses KMT as CCP puppet.
    Thank you for publishing the clip which is valuable to history lover. As a native Chinese, I have relatives on both sides of the civil war. This is the same situation for countless Chinese families. As you know, Chinese value their family more than ideology. So it is well accepted till now that we are ONE FAMILY accross the Taiwan strait. Despite politics and ideology, people can live and work freely on both sides, and treated as native citizen. So independent or not, I don't think that makes much difference in common people's life.
    Hope US will not interefere too much because we all know what that means... from history.

    • @IvanDmitriev1
      @IvanDmitriev1 3 года назад +1

      You're welcome, that's my objective actually - find and showcase the most out of the forgotten or lesser known parts of history. I'm focused on historical research, and it's actually @PeriscopeFilm which does the purchasing, digitization and restoration of these movies, that I, along with other domain specialists in their historical specialties, then process.
      There are more clips here, which and normally I process those when new ones are digitized. Just look up by keywords such as China, Hong Kong, Shanghai and so on, and please donate on their Patreon :3 if you are so inclined :) .

    • @user-cd7uc7dq8p
      @user-cd7uc7dq8p 3 года назад +8

      You forgot 1960s fought India in Himalaya.

    • @peterchang3142
      @peterchang3142 3 года назад +4

      I'm so sad to see this document, and the result of the civil war, Mou claimed that Chinese people stand up again, actually their lives became more worse ever, under the communist goverment, people has no freedom, landlords lost their land and lives, communist Party and the leaders became the new landlords, the door is closed from outside, the whole country was isolated for 30 years, the liveving standard was backward, the food was limited, everything were un?der controled, until 1976they shaked hand with American in order to solved their problem.

    • @esl2317
      @esl2317 3 года назад +5

      @The A team Thank you. Sino-Viet war is part of the Sino-USSR conflict so I omitted that. Sino-India war... I prefer to say a border skirmish without much consequences.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 года назад +4

      @@peterchang3142 Documents declassified showed Mao tried to reach out to Truman - but he was rebuffed. It was the US who isolated China - just like Pearl Buck predicted in this film. Same thing was done to Cuba... Castro tried to be friendly with the US before he turned to the Soviets - but he was ignored.

  • @geyretibra1143
    @geyretibra1143 3 года назад +95

    This is so absolutely valuable even today to understand the real problems, demographics and history of China as well as US-China relations.

    • @freedomisdead9638
      @freedomisdead9638 3 года назад +2

      By saying that you said absolutely nothing! Your comment sounds so woke, so P.C, so random
      In your comment switch the two words "China" and "U.S.A" by any countries, regions, cities, peoples, races, whatever and your sentence will exactly mean the same "nothing"! Nothing specific!

    • @geyretibra1143
      @geyretibra1143 3 года назад +4

      @@freedomisdead9638 First of all, by "the real problems" I was implying that many have inaccurate or misguided views on the politics of China; then followed immediately with "demographics" and "history", I was pointing out that these two factors are worth-nothing and not just the "political systems", "dictatorships" or terms we have used a lot when discussing the topic.
      The US-China relation is stressed in the end because I liked how the old intellectuals approached a completely different culture with objectivity, analytical thinking, firmness, etc. all these things that we are lacking today.
      Because I wanted to write a quick comment it might seem over-generalizing. But there's deeper meaning I implied but didn't explicitly state, such as the above.

    • @jackl2257
      @jackl2257 3 года назад

      @@freedomisdead9638 nobody cares ....cancel culture?

    • @glorych1168
      @glorych1168 3 года назад +1

      destiny of China since 1928 linked to USA.
      Truman abandoned chiang n roc doomed

    • @cattycorner8
      @cattycorner8 2 года назад

      I hope the U.S. does not stand aside and let China overtake Taiwan the way we have let Russia conquer Ukraine.

  • @kangtamimchannel6397
    @kangtamimchannel6397 Год назад

    thanks for sharing

  • @Mrpastry909
    @Mrpastry909 2 года назад +29

    I'm surprised, the Chinese pronunciations aren't as bad as I'd imagined they'd be in a 1950s film. Kuomintang is correctly pronounced with a hard G sound, Chiang Kai-Shek's last name has a J sound, and Mao Zedong's name isn't too horribly mangled.

    • @somgears1589
      @somgears1589 2 года назад +2

      Maybe nowadays people just dont want to work hard on their job

    • @Mrpastry909
      @Mrpastry909 2 года назад

      @@wenshuenkung2049 你是台灣人嗎?

    • @Ickie71
      @Ickie71 11 месяцев назад

      in thewest it was mao tse tung for decades!...wow what a spelling error that was.

    • @Mrpastry909
      @Mrpastry909 11 месяцев назад +1

      @@Ickie71 It wasn't a spelling error. There have been several systems used over the centuries to write Chinese names in Latin letters. Mao Tse-Tung uses the Wade-Giles romanization system, whereas Mao Zedong uses the Hanyu Pinyin romanization system, which didn't take off in the West until the 1970s.

    • @Ickie71
      @Ickie71 11 месяцев назад

      @@Mrpastry909 oh thankyou forthat i knew i remembered that right

  • @TrueBluesProductions
    @TrueBluesProductions 2 года назад +47

    Many parallels to recent news from Afghanistan. There's major differences of course, but nevertheless, striking similarities: American funded and armed corrupt urban leader falls to rural insurgents backed by neighboring country, against the odds. The parading of captured American equipment after the insurgent victory, and so forth

    • @orecreeper2128
      @orecreeper2128 2 года назад +6

      Actually, for a large part of the civil war, the US completely stopped funds to chiang kai-shek's government and tried to overthrow him because he kept going against them.

    • @Vysair
      @Vysair 2 года назад +9

      Vietnam???

    • @user-tq4dq5lo5g
      @user-tq4dq5lo5g 2 года назад +10

      @@Vysair yes, more common features with Vietnam in 1964-1975, the communist government in the North with Soviet support, the pro-Western government in the South with American support and communist or at least pro-communist resistance in the South, but contrary to South Vietnamese government Chiang Kai-shek did not have a real massive and straight American support, American troops did not fight against Chinese communist unlike against Vietnamese ones.

    • @Amidat
      @Amidat 2 года назад +5

      Yup and American people never seem to get it because the news media feeds them fantasy.

    • @noahpeng1689
      @noahpeng1689 Год назад

      @@Vysair The same is true of Korea. If the United States does not maintain its military presence, it will soon be swallowed by North Korea.

  • @jeremiahshum
    @jeremiahshum 3 года назад +6

    Hope to see more history war video

  • @luischeng5519
    @luischeng5519 3 года назад

    Thanks for your

  • @playergameburix2450
    @playergameburix2450 3 года назад +7

    6:20
    what a great reversal of the situation

  • @stephensorenson5114
    @stephensorenson5114 3 года назад +5

    this episode of "the twentieth century"with walter cronkite did'nt have the main and end titles with the magnificent theme music!

  • @mz0911
    @mz0911 3 года назад +59

    It's a good film but I think some of the screen is from ww2 against japanese.like 4:50 that looks like the chiang kai shelf s elite force equiped with German gears and weapons. Most of them lost at the Battle of Shanghai against Japanese. During chinese civil war chiang's force were equiped with american weapons.

    • @xxxx9131
      @xxxx9131 3 года назад +7

      在中国战场你能看到所有国家的武器,因为中国之前一段时间军阀割据,所有各个军阀有各个不同的支持国家

    • @tonbopro
      @tonbopro 3 года назад +1

      Chiang‘s Elite were deliberately pulled from frontlines to his side during the war and so did not really fight the Japanese despite what was drummed up;those who sacrificed were lesser not so well equipped but what they lacked in arms they more than made up with valour,just a side note in eyes of propagandists

    • @andraslibal
      @andraslibal 2 года назад +2

      @The A team it was a waste of the best troops to draw in Western participation. It would have been much better to keep the inner parts of the country wage a low key guerrilla war and let the Americans fight it out with the Japanese take the brunt of the casualties and end the war with the Chinese nationalist army intact. It is only after huge devastations of a war that the communists can take over. Also they were helped by the Soviets a lot.

    • @charleschoy1392
      @charleschoy1392 2 года назад +3

      Several elite divisions fighting in the civil war, were totally German trained!

    • @shermanfirefly5410
      @shermanfirefly5410 2 года назад +2

      @The A team And the thing about KMT elite forces is that the KMT rely heavily on inport ammunitions, so when their trade with Germany was cut off and KMT factories fails to produce enough ammo for the german weapons, those elite forces ran out of ammo pretty quickly

  • @coresimon6675
    @coresimon6675 3 года назад +74

    we should introduce more Chinese views of their history. that way we understand them better.

    • @terry1708
      @terry1708 3 года назад +30

      This is only part of the history, Chinese know the full history. do you know that CCP and KMT were working together like one party for a long time when Sun Yat-sen lead China before Chiang Kai-shek. But after Sun died, Chiang wanted to kick CCP out and started killing CCP members, and started five wars with CCP. That's why the CCP had to start the Long March, and the CCP army went down from 300 thousand to 20 thousand after the Long Match. When the Japanese invaded China, KMT and CCP worked together after Xi An INCIDENT. But KMT don't want to work with CCP together after WWII.

    • @coresimon6675
      @coresimon6675 3 года назад +2

      @@terry1708 I tend to know more, any books you can recommend?

    • @explorerofunknownworlddept6232
      @explorerofunknownworlddept6232 3 года назад +1

      @@coresimon6675 你自己就是中国人。哈哈哈😄

    • @coresimon6675
      @coresimon6675 3 года назад +1

      @@explorerofunknownworlddept6232 I like to be considered that way :)

    • @glorych1168
      @glorych1168 3 года назад +1

      destiny of China linked to USA. since 1928
      Truman abandoned chiang n roc doomed

  •  2 года назад +3

    Lịch sử luôn thú vị

  • @dssdaf5010
    @dssdaf5010 3 года назад +34

    Imagining defeating a U.S. equipped, motorized, 3 million men army and conquering such a large country with primitive military equipment (no jets, no battleships, few tanks, limited ammo). Even though Mao made many political blunders when managing China, he is a military genius. Some people in the comments really have no idea what they're talking about. He occupied rural areas to encircle cities and sap the adversaries. He started from the north and pushed to south. He used many flanking and encirclement tactics. And he didn't have any formal military education. This is pure genius! I bet if General MacArthur, whom I think is an overrated 5-star general, led the nationalist army to fight against the PLA under Mao, he would be whining for more nuclear attacks to help him in months.

    • @willbill6663
      @willbill6663 3 года назад +2

      very true

    • @leontan3512
      @leontan3512 3 года назад

      Lin Biao moreso than Mao.

    • @hulugulu7899
      @hulugulu7899 3 года назад +3

      @@leontan3512 Lin Biao became an excellent commander after he met Mao.

    • @casecao8412
      @casecao8412 3 года назад +5

      @PANDEMIC BY CCP AND XITLER Even after the war with Japan, the KMT still had far superior numbers and better equipment over the measly CCP fighters. In 1946 Chiang was still well respected, had many experienced veterans under his command and had strong holdings in all the wealthier regions. The KMT outnumbered the CCP over a million troops. Despite all the odds Mao still won anyway with an army of peasants against a professionally Western-equipped army
      No matter how you spin it, Mao is clearly a better tactician than Chiang. That's probably less due to Mao being a genius, and more to the fact that Chiang was kind of a moron who turned all his allies away from him and allowed Mao to hit all his weak points. In the end many of the KMT's own regiments and generals abandoned it and joined the communists.

    • @casecao8412
      @casecao8412 3 года назад +1

      ​@PANDEMIC BY CCP AND XITLER Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was talking to a 5-star general! Please allow me a glimpse of your divine, infinite wisdom!

  • @xkn8147
    @xkn8147 3 года назад +55

    It's so interesting to see the American perspective on this.

    • @lwt9132
      @lwt9132 3 года назад +8

      I have never heard the American perspective about anything.
      I think America never comments anything about Libya or Iraq.

    • @freedomisdead9638
      @freedomisdead9638 3 года назад +7

      Not all the Americans in power to be specific, General Mac Arthur's had a different view on the matters,
      He was willing to clear communism with nuke bombs, as early as 1945! The guy was a genius!

    • @lwt9132
      @lwt9132 3 года назад +17

      @@freedomisdead9638 u dont even know what communism is.

    • @lwt9132
      @lwt9132 3 года назад +11

      @@freedomisdead9638 libtard

    • @freedomisdead9638
      @freedomisdead9638 3 года назад

      @@lwt9132
      Do Vietnamese don t know about Communism? Shut up!

  • @stevechilcoat2353
    @stevechilcoat2353 2 года назад +20

    General Albert Wedemeyer must have been highly competent general. Listening and looking at him today makes one realize how inferior our military leaders are currently.

    • @forrestlee6435
      @forrestlee6435 Год назад

      he did an excellent job alerting the Truman government about the upcoming collapse of KMT, Truman did nothing but follow the agreement between US and USSR, which is not to intervene in China. All death of US soldier in Korea and Vietnam is because of the loss of China.

  • @whaleborn
    @whaleborn 3 года назад +234

    The result can be summarried in simple words; people 's choice.

    • @edwardzhou9668
      @edwardzhou9668 3 года назад +17

      u do know thousands people fled to taiwan, hongkong, usa and other countries right ? and a ship full with refugees to taiwan sunk near shanghai due to overloading, it was called the chinese version of the titanic. Farmers are easy to fool my friends, people never get to choose.

    • @tlenon2497
      @tlenon2497 3 года назад

      ruclips.net/video/aHxbUaUY160/видео.html

    • @user-vn5oq1pi9r
      @user-vn5oq1pi9r 3 года назад +4

      @H L the political killing after korean war and the communist party policy made 30million death the 1989killing and it's cultural ........it's very evil like nazi i can't speak in english

    • @user-vn5oq1pi9r
      @user-vn5oq1pi9r 3 года назад

      @H L thank you for your message u know i am a senior high student and my english is poor if u can read or use translate software to translate chinese please tell me i will answer your opinion hhhhhhha i respect every deep thinking person best wishes PS:i have an american teacher and two south africa teacher

    • @clacicle
      @clacicle 3 года назад +3

      @@user-vn5oq1pi9r what the other person was basically saying wad that you should just sweep history under the rug. Forget the horrible atrocities committed by certain people or groups and look at how well things are going now. This is basically standard practice in many authoritarian countries. One of the most important things that you can do, as a high school student, is to become very critical of all information that is presented to you. Where does it come from and who is presenting it are very important questions that need to be asked all the time. Unfortunately, people raised in authoritarian countries or environments have a lot of difficulty with this mainly because they don’t like to be challenged. Being challenged is dangerous and that is why they prefer that everyone just think and say the same things. Make sure you ask your foreign teachers about this. They are not always perfect, but they are probably going to be a bit more open to questions and how to go about questioning others.

  • @josephsiew8494
    @josephsiew8494 3 года назад +103

    The takeaway from this documentary is that in 1940, the commies had won every battle they fought north of the Yangtze.

    • @sjsupa
      @sjsupa 3 года назад +8

      Same for south.

    • @xxxx9131
      @xxxx9131 3 года назад +8

      并没有,1940还在抗日呢,1941年珍珠港事件,同盟国才开始真正帮助中国

    • @sjsupa
      @sjsupa 3 года назад

      @@xxxx9131 他说的是40年代,并不是1940年这一年。

    • @xxxx9131
      @xxxx9131 3 года назад +2

      @@sjsupa 40也不对,40已经过湖北湖南了

    • @josephsiew8494
      @josephsiew8494 3 года назад +1

      @@xxxx9131 the guerilla warfare by the commies

  • @chriswestwood3289
    @chriswestwood3289 3 года назад +165

    Interesting, if CPC is ruthless, why people follow them and fight with useless American allies?

    • @geoff9858
      @geoff9858 3 года назад +4

      To regain their independence from the countries that "occupy" parts of China.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 3 года назад +52

      because the commies were ruthless towards the landowners and other "upper class" people, who were like 1% of the population while giving land to the peasants who were 99% of the population. plus the KMT was even more ruthless but in the opposite way, ruthless towards the peasants and in bed with the rich. then you add incompetent and a heavy dose of corruption, its virtually impossible for the KMT to win by the time the commies had consolidated in manchuria.

    • @yanlongfu8443
      @yanlongfu8443 3 года назад +4

      the question you ask should be considered common sense and many propaganda just omit that.

    • @mxn1948
      @mxn1948 3 года назад +10

      ​@The A team 放屁,一开始可能不是每个人都拿到,打战要紧。后来谁老家没一块小地? 我爷爷那一代就有国家给的地,后来拆迁,换一楼。你没分地, 一前肯定是地主。
      蒋介石想法还可以,当是他就是没做到, 政府照样腐败,民不聊生。

    • @null..
      @null.. 3 года назад +5

      "And most people join the fight in 1945 are the ex Japanese Kwantung Army in Manchuria"
      What a BS.... lol

  • @madcarew.3256
    @madcarew.3256 3 года назад +9

    Oh for hindsight!!

  • @user-hd3ho5hv1m
    @user-hd3ho5hv1m 3 года назад +16

    I was surprised by Petal Buck’s point. She predicted communist China so right. She stayed in China many years and knew China very well. And a genius for sure!

  • @justinjaymesjoseph5887
    @justinjaymesjoseph5887 2 года назад +9

    "The Banner of Mao Zedong flutters high!"

    • @lanzgalang5028
      @lanzgalang5028 2 года назад

      A called a nationalist Chinese a traitor to alies to change to communist and enemy Maoism

  • @IvanDmitriev1
    @IvanDmitriev1 3 года назад +23

    Hello all! I processed the historical elements of this movie, if you have any questions regarding its contents, you're free to ask, and I'll answer if I have time!

    • @back282317
      @back282317 3 года назад +1

      China? real China? who? ha😎

    • @marekmazurek8459
      @marekmazurek8459 3 года назад +4

      I don't care I'm watching it to find out info don't need your help with a documentary lmao

    • @arseneaubert6600
      @arseneaubert6600 3 года назад +1

      ​@@marekmazurek8459 If you're such an expert, why aren't you doing it? I bet you can't understand anything without explanation:P Such a poor fish lol... 🐛🐛🐛🐛🐛

    • @glorych1168
      @glorych1168 3 года назад

      destiny of China linked to USA. since 1928
      Truman abandoned chiang n roc doomed

  • @DanHenryx
    @DanHenryx 3 года назад +10

    Seeing Walter Chronkite manspreading at the end ... The wait was worth it.

  • @vivekraychowdhury4348
    @vivekraychowdhury4348 3 года назад +1

    Where's the rest of the film?

  • @rarediamond6868
    @rarediamond6868 2 года назад +13

    Pearl Buck - wow what an understanding and foresight - Amazing.

    • @kshen7485
      @kshen7485 2 года назад +4

      Yes, nowadays CCP’s success stories have proved the correctness and truthfulness of her statement, no matter her honesty.

  • @tsengtanshuy628
    @tsengtanshuy628 3 года назад +66

    CKS (蒋介石)1946 victory was superficial. Before KMT attacked CPC occupied cities, Mao commanded most cities should have a alternative base in the mountain (Mao learned the lesson from the root cause of PLA long march). So CPC established their base in the prepared mountain right away after they gave up the cities to KMT. Mao called it a strategic retreat. Eventually CKS fell into the same mistakes as the first three defeats by PLA in 1934; The last two was successful due to the help of German consultant and forced CPC to give up their base and started the long march. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. CKS should be blamed for the defeat of China civil war.

    • @tsengtanshuy628
      @tsengtanshuy628 3 года назад +4

      @The A team The CKS regime was a corrupted government. his military killed civilian and his officials corrupted. Mao let CKS to be at the upper hand in 1946 because he wanted to trick CKS army into his known territory(诱敌深入), then destroy them. CKS and his army became so proud, they totally did not know Mao strategy. How do you explain Mao only used 20,000 soldiers to defeat Hu's 200,000 soldiers. Hu was defeated many times without knowing that his young sectary was the spy for PLA. What a joke!!

    • @tsengtanshuy628
      @tsengtanshuy628 3 года назад +1

      @The A team I agreed that Lin was Brilliant. Without Lin and other generals Mao could not defeat CKS. But Mao was the the upper and total strategist and his generals only followed Mao commands. It like a basketball NBA game. MJ was supper but without his coach, MJ would not win 6 NBA titles. BTW. During 1946 to 1950 civil war. Lin always kept Mao 10 military strategies outlines in his pocket.

    • @tsengtanshuy628
      @tsengtanshuy628 3 года назад +5

      @The A team It's not chanchun massacre. It's chanchun circled and people died of hungry. CKS even did awful thing than Mao: CKS opened up the levees on the Yellow River near Zhengzhou in June 1938. And tried to use the flood to stop the Japanese advancement. The flood killed at least 500,000 civilian and made more than 5 million civilian became refugee. Evidence showed the flood attack did not stop the Japan advancement but also gave CPC a chance to convert some refugees to their soldiers.

    • @user-ts7gs1dv9q
      @user-ts7gs1dv9q 2 года назад +3

      @The A team 你懂个屁,想要讨论毛泽东你就应该先去多研究共产党党史,别把嘴巴当做屁眼,张开就来。

    • @user-dj3lo4iw2f
      @user-dj3lo4iw2f 2 года назад

      The root reason was the brutal political purge in 1921, CKS not only brutally killed a lot of people who believed in communists in that brutal campaign, he also killed almost all those leftists in the Nationalist Party. Since then, The Nationalist party lost all its connection with and support from grassroots in China. On the contrary, CPC has a lot of supports from ordinary Chinese. The brutality of CKS was beyond people's imagination. After Red Army left bases in Jiangxi and other southern bases for the Long March. CKS ordered Nationalist army to kill all adult males and burned down all houses

  • @pradeepweerasekara2600
    @pradeepweerasekara2600 3 года назад +32

    Thanks to great leader and his men, china finally stood on her feet.

    • @coolmansawesome
      @coolmansawesome 2 года назад +4

      Huh… well to me it seemed like Mao let the KMT take all the losses, then he backstabbed them, caused a famine, killed ethnic minorities, invaded Tibet for no reason then died.

    • @coolmansawesome
      @coolmansawesome 2 года назад +1

      @Lil Yu Care to disprove me?

    • @nahtatroll
      @nahtatroll 2 года назад +1

      @Lil Yu China is a capitalist country (communist in name & propaganda only) in the modern day after the reforms by Deng Xiaoping. They have a market economy. For Tibet, you can argue what you want about history but the people of Tibet did not want to be a part of China, and most still do not. You can apply the same argument to any piece of land as well. Italy under the Roman Empire ruled all of Europe for hundreds of years, do they have a right to all of Europe? I don't think so.
      Also the "more than 2000 years ago" thing is just not true, I'm not sure where you got that from. It first became a part of China during the Yuan dynasty (And that was under foreign rule, since the Yuan was under the Mongol Empire) in the mid 13th century and then went on and off becoming a part of Chinese empires and independent when it could. Oh yeah and.. dynasty. Empire. Imperialism. So much for communist "anti-imperialism"

    • @postahundredcommentsbutonl4408
      @postahundredcommentsbutonl4408 4 месяца назад +1

      @@coolmansawesome First, as the leader of Lenin’s religion, Mao Zedong did too many ridiculous and even sinful things. As a Confucian collectivist, I hate him extremely. But his original intention was to pursue fairness. The various atrocities committed by Western colonists in China shaped his extreme character. (For example, he believes that all wealthy people are lackeys of Western colonists)
      Second, Mao Zedong made many mistakes during his time in power, but he did not kill ethnic minorities. On the contrary, as a communist, he spent his whole life attacking Han chauvinism. For example, during his administration, he firmly opposed the implementation of Mandarin in ethnic minority areas. (At the same time, Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore forcibly promoted Mandarin and abolished dialects in Singapore)
      In 1978, the popularity rate of Mandarin in China was only 20%. This has greatly hindered China's economic development.
      Therefore, Mao Zedong's ultra-left policy is completely wrong. But when you say he killed ethnic minorities, isn’t that pure nonsense? You should criticize him for overemphasizing national autonomy and forgetting about national unity.
      Invasion of Tibet? Why do you dare to continue lying under this video?
      Documentaries shot by the United States in 1937/1944/1950 all clearly marked Tibet as Chinese territory.
      Doesn’t the video you see now label Tibet as Chinese territory?

    • @postahundredcommentsbutonl4408
      @postahundredcommentsbutonl4408 4 месяца назад +1

      @@nahtatroll Talking nonsense
      First, how can a country's territory be divided at will? If a country could be divided at will, wouldn't the whole world have wars every day? Where is the dignity of the country and the nation?
      Lincoln is called a great hero in American history. According to you, Lincoln, who stopped the division of America, was a bad guy? Considering that the United States before Lincoln was a confederacy, states originally had the power to withdraw. Lincoln's actions were actually unconstitutional. But Americans still call him a hero. What's more, China has an absolutely unified system of prefectures and counties since ancient times.
      Second, The Yuan emperor converted to Tibetan Buddhism. During the Yuan Dynasty。The Tibetan monks wanted to expand their power and led Tibet to actively join the Yuan Dynasty. From that moment on, Tibet became Chinese territory. Where did the aggression and expansion come from? Tibet became Chinese territory without any war.
      As for whether you are willing or not. Why can you, a Westerner, speak for Tibetans?
      During the rule of the Chinese Kuomintang, the Soviet Union desperately tried to divide China's Xinjiang, Tibet, and Mongolia. The United States firmly opposes this.
      The Communist Party of China came to power, and the United States desperately divided China's Xinjiang and Tibet (Mongolia had already been ceded to the Soviet Union at this time). The Soviet Union stood up and firmly opposed it.
      Please tell me, Do the local people in Tibet want to separate, or do the Western colonists want to separate China??

  • @Word187
    @Word187 3 года назад +13

    With all historic events. I always wonder: What if...

    • @echowhiskey1368
      @echowhiskey1368 3 года назад +7

      There is no what if! The first thing they did to the surrendered soldiers was to hold a meeting with them and let them speak up, then one after another they cried how they were underpaid, mistreated and suppressed in the army after they were forced to become KMT soldiers from farmland, they just had enough and had no idea what they were fighting for. The ones who were willing to stay they stayed, the ones who wanted go home they were sent back home with free necessities for the travel. Some of those who overwhelmingly defeated and then remained became ones of the most fearless warriors during Korean War against UN troops. Many ppl lose their purpose to carry on, just get by day by day, but when you start to realize what you are fighting for, you would be fearless too. There are much more details but too little space and time to list, but this piece of history is so damn fascinating when you dig into it.

    • @Mondo762
      @Mondo762 3 года назад +3

      @@echowhiskey1368 Yes, fighting for a system that will kill millions of your countrymen is wonderful. As many as 55 million that were starved to death during the Great Leap Forward think it was a grand idea. Mao Zedong has more blood on his hands than any person in history.

    • @echowhiskey1368
      @echowhiskey1368 3 года назад +7

      @@Mondo762 However you ignored the situation that new China was being isolated from the global community with sanctions, and USSR went rogue suddenly pushing to collet debts. It was the people’s representatives (aka, the term senators in the west) voted to pay them the debts, because “Chinese pay their debts”. For example, China had to slaughter 5000ish pigs per day just to send to Russia to pay debts; Russians used the gauges made by metal wires to select the best fruit out which was to collect the debts, and as for the rest of smaller but good apples or pears they just dump them as trashes, which worsened the situation that the people were suffering from shortage of food because of the draught. Well, Chinese pay their debts! Also both Russia and US were threatening to use N-bombs against China, China had to start to store strategic-storage foods to prepare the possible nuclear war. Blaming everything to Mao is misleading from the history which is just another tool of propaganda from the west. And it is always easy for you as a keyboard warrior to criticize a state leader while you have no solutions to uplift such a huge country in that situation to a better future as a whole, maybe you do have your own short-term one with no dignity-bow on your knees to the west one more time so they could tear the country apart and let it slip into a swamp of warlords again, then the west could suck the natural resource out to profit their capitalists just like how they have done to those Mideast and N-African countries. The way of analyzing a certain event of history but considering more factors around it is called dialectical materialism, I guess this philosophy term is considered as an evil thing in the people’s mind like yours, cuz you got brainwashed by the west’s propaganda.

    • @Mondo762
      @Mondo762 3 года назад +3

      @@echowhiskey1368 You project like crazy and it is all wrong.
      First - I am not a keyboard warrior. As an Engineer in the Merchant Marine I spent most my time on the China coast. This includes 5 ships home ported there. I also lived on Taiwan as a kid. I sailed into 2 wars. How many have you been in? You are the keyboard warrior as you parrot all the crap that has been stuffed in your head. You are a typical lefty/socialist, automatically going into personal attack mode instead of giving an answer. That is because you can't respond to actual facts.

    • @echowhiskey1368
      @echowhiskey1368 3 года назад +9

      @@Mondo762 How many elders have you talked to? How many villages near northern border have you visited? Over 20 years, as a drilling engineer, working on land rigs, I have been to coasts, woods, deserts, deep mountains, and hundreds of villages where always have some aged survivors from WWII, civil war, Korean War etc. We always would go out to reach out locals and have chats with them while drilling breaks. Okay, I am sorry for calling you that straight away because it is quite annoying that people on internet keep talking about this one-side story again and again. It is good you have some degree of experience, but being in wars doesn’t make people figure out the whole picture or the whole history, which has been proven over thousands of years, that is why it needs more people to record history, either in written or in verbal, then the following generations crossing-check and put the pieces of history together to learn from it. The example I told you came from veterans’ personal experience who we spoke to, which is just another piece of history that you as an outsider engineer or whatever do not know, doesn’t mean the history is not there.
      I can apologize for offending you, but would you do self-criticize for pretending knowing everything? Never mind, unlike me, who used to be pro-west when I was young but gradually changed my mind after I interacted so many average Chinese and westerners, I know so many guys like you would never change your mind, I just post my thought once a while when I get bored, now I feel bored even more, I wish you a good time, peace.

  • @WOOKY27
    @WOOKY27 3 года назад +32

    If you looked back into history, the red China is different flavor than USSR. Take that advice.

    • @simulify8726
      @simulify8726 3 года назад +7

      But the red China started on the principles of USSR, and when they formed PRC, they ditched it. But now, China is not communist in any sense, market is capitalist and their is no socialism.

    • @sappy_boi
      @sappy_boi 3 года назад +9

      @@simulify8726 its a socialist market economy

    • @danielfan598
      @danielfan598 3 года назад +3

      Well said yet I don't think today's cold war warriors would care

    • @to-tt7fc
      @to-tt7fc 3 года назад +5

      Every country aligns itself with certain doctrines but will have its own way or flavor to govern and run itself when it becomes strong enough and; therefore, fully independent. Smaller countries may take longer. But with China 's caliber, it is not surprised that it runs its government its own way, different from Russia 's or any other communist country 's in the world.

    • @WOOKY27
      @WOOKY27 3 года назад +1

      @@to-tt7fc mabye Biden/Harris admin does not have doctrines you will also see weird things happen.

  • @markbenjamin1703
    @markbenjamin1703 3 года назад +24

    It's always the same voice who narrates

    • @windborne8795
      @windborne8795 3 года назад

      And I'm glad that it is. There's something nostalgic in that. 👍🏻

  • @deepalib3096
    @deepalib3096 2 года назад

    Nice to know about China's civil war

  • @qianjinqian5461
    @qianjinqian5461 3 года назад

    please 1080p HD.

    • @skotskot3379
      @skotskot3379 3 года назад +1

      you gotta be kidding. 1080p in 1950

  • @user-infjqxu
    @user-infjqxu 3 года назад +8

    5:47
    I like the music

  • @m.a.118
    @m.a.118 3 года назад +24

    00:26 Interesting how a US 1950's documentary recognized Tibet as part of Nationalist China....

    • @david-lonewolf8924
      @david-lonewolf8924 3 года назад +5

      A territory of a sovereign nation is not to be "recognized" by a foreign nation, what you see here is simply a matter of America's double standard and hypocrisy, using such standard, America simply ceases to exist, not even the original 13 colonies. Tibet was not a part of China until the 18th Century when Manchu's Qing Dynasty finally managed to have a solid grasp of that enormous piece of beautiful land, the Nationalists' ROC (Republic of China) and later the PRC (People's Republic of China) simply just inherited the land from its previous regime.

    • @batzorigvaanchig6358
      @batzorigvaanchig6358 3 года назад +29

      @@david-lonewolf8924 that "beautiful land" had a literal slave society and caste system until communist liberation

    • @a.m.armstrong8354
      @a.m.armstrong8354 3 года назад +6

      @@batzorigvaanchig6358 Agreed.

    • @david-lonewolf8924
      @david-lonewolf8924 3 года назад +10

      @@batzorigvaanchig6358 Absolutely right. You're one of the rare who actually knows the true (dark) history of Tibet. Props to that, buddy. "beautiful land" refers mainly to its mesmerizing natural environment.
      In 1958 my grandpa, a PLA soldier, was deployed to Tibet, serving and helping operating a local power plant. Almost lost his life when the 1959 riot suddenly broke out, he witnessed innocent people getting chased and cut down by the rioters with sabers. Was a horrifying ordeal. My father himself also stayed in Tibet for 13 years.

    • @m.a.118
      @m.a.118 3 года назад

      @@david-lonewolf8924 Pretty much the point I was alluding to. How the US tends to flip flop. However, also interesting- Didn't the ROC have claims on Mongolia proper while the PRC dropped that claim since it was a Soviet client state? (Note {outer} Mongolia not being part of China)
      However, at least from my study- Tibet broke off from China with other warlord states in 1911 when the Qing Dynasty collapsed and the incumbent KMT was unable, or didn't have the resources to re-conquer Tibet because it was too busy fighting warlords (Northern Expedition, Beiyang army, Japanese pressures in the north), and after 1927 the Communists post Shanghai Massacre. As a result, Tibet was defacto "independent" from 1911-1951 because both the KMT and PRC were too busy in eastern China fighting themselves or the Japanese. Similar sort of story with Xinjiang and White Russian and later Soviet influences in the area until 1949 when the Soviets told members of the former ETR (East Turkestan Republic which was a Soviet puppet like Mongolia) to stand down and accept PRC annexation.

  • @bubujibujibuji958
    @bubujibujibuji958 3 года назад

    Why so late you just post this clip

  • @yaoypl
    @yaoypl 3 года назад +29

    Watching an old B/W documentary feels though that this Chinese Civil War was a thing of the past, a history that was a long time ago, right? Well, it is not. The Chinese Civil War has not officially finished yet between mainland China and Tawain. For political reasons, Tawain is still separated from the mainland today. China determines to unify Tawain peacefully but if Tawain keeps refusing, then China will have to finish the unfinished business of the Chinese Civil War to take Tawain back when that day comes the US better stays out of it.

    • @kitnascimento0
      @kitnascimento0 3 года назад +3

      Sure but wasting money and lives to take back a wortless island is also questionable.
      After all other than emotional "reunify china" mantra there is not much there. Taiwan has nothing:
      no oil, gas, mineral, strategic imporance,...
      The big advantage would be it not be allowed to be used by adversaries other than that not much is gained by taking back Taiwan

    • @user-xg8yy7yl1d
      @user-xg8yy7yl1d 3 года назад +1

      @@kitnascimento0
      The reds would also be adding several million people who politically disagree with the CCP if they took Taiwan.
      Not everyone there is a KMT supporting nationalist but very few seemingly want to be under CCP rule.

    • @maxmeggeneder8935
      @maxmeggeneder8935 3 года назад +7

      This comment section is full of indoctrinated people who think that China would be so stupid and use force against or even aggressively invade Taiwan.
      This is complete BS and has a lot to do with modern imperialist cold war propaganda and nothing to do with reality. Same goes for so many things first world westerners, especially US citizens, believe about China that are either not true at all or at best half truths.

    • @maxmeggeneder8935
      @maxmeggeneder8935 3 года назад +2

      @Uncle Ho I agree comrade.

    • @user-dj3lo4iw2f
      @user-dj3lo4iw2f 2 года назад +4

      @@kitnascimento0 Taiwan is an island that China cannot afford to lose. The island is too important, anything else are extra.

  • @tonbopro
    @tonbopro 3 года назад +12

    Ms Pearl Buck deserves to be honored for her sound judgement of Chinese people

  • @sastraali5754
    @sastraali5754 3 года назад +3

    So, never war again.

  • @user-nw8xm5zp3p
    @user-nw8xm5zp3p 3 года назад +2

    👍

  • @hakdok649
    @hakdok649 2 года назад +1

    5:15 i did not know one grenade can destroy a building/house

  • @vasilileung2204
    @vasilileung2204 3 года назад +6

    When the US wants to mediate, fight harder

  • @majorcalvary6515
    @majorcalvary6515 3 года назад +11

    The film is misleading. Chinese KMT German trained and supplied 88 and 89 divisions were lost in battle of Shanghai in 1937. There were only about 20k troops that later had to defend Japanese invasion army of 100k. Initially Japanese only had a few thousands marines, but they had support of Battle Cruiser Izumo and Air Force Bombers based in Manchukuo. Later Reserves and Kwantung Army from Manchukuo would be transported to Shanghai as invasion main force.
    KMT lost because Truman had no interest defending China, and US took Japan, and China were ceded to the Soviets. Potsdam Conference Stalin demanded Manchurian Rail Roads, Port Arthur, and recognition of Mongolian Independence to separate China and Soviet border. Truman left Chiang to defend China for himself, while Mao and Kim Family were supported by Soviet to take China and Korea.

  • @suryateja1713
    @suryateja1713 2 года назад +1

    And here it goes 14:55

  • @playergameburix2450
    @playergameburix2450 3 года назад +5

    General Albert Se y de Meyer blinked one eye at the camera 9:05

  • @watdatdoo
    @watdatdoo 3 года назад +6

    2:43 Almost a Mission Impossible theme song.

  • @malmsteen2002
    @malmsteen2002 3 года назад +18

    2:14 WTF?! He just killed his entire squad with that grenade throw! LOL!

    • @rf2032
      @rf2032 3 года назад +11

      Could be dummy grenades for training. Still, aren't you supposed to toss those and wait for them to blow up before leaving cover...

    • @jxmai7687
      @jxmai7687 3 года назад +3

      some of those film was set up.

    • @drlca6601
      @drlca6601 2 года назад +5

      @@jxmai7687 Most combat footage until the 1960s was staged, and indeed during the 60s. Naturally, due to technical limitations, it was hard to get the footage during heavy firefights.

  • @christiancharles3884
    @christiancharles3884 2 года назад

    From riches to rags and from rags to riches.no matter how bad things r they manage to overcome.

  • @cfcf-th8sx
    @cfcf-th8sx 5 месяцев назад

    有没有湖北天门人

  • @jaxciohc253
    @jaxciohc253 3 года назад +12

    Based CPC

    • @stoggafllik
      @stoggafllik 3 года назад +3

      Bolshevism isnt based you dunce.

    • @jaxciohc253
      @jaxciohc253 3 года назад +2

      @@stoggafllik it is, and I’m tired of pretending it’s not

  • @gunfreak7.62cox3
    @gunfreak7.62cox3 2 года назад +3

    That guys horse at 6:50 did him dirty as hell.

    • @lanzgalang5028
      @lanzgalang5028 2 года назад

      A called a nationalist Chinese a traitor to alies to change to communist and enemy Maoism

  • @overdosh
    @overdosh 2 года назад +1

    why deleted my coment???

  • @goldeq8521
    @goldeq8521 2 года назад +2

    Nice footage,War is not about the weapons it is about the people.Make me think of Afghan13 Aug 2021. Communist soldiers were poorest of the poor they defeat the rich military supported by US Government. Before 1911 the whole China was under a slave and serfs system as Dynasty. just a footnote. Madam Sun Yet sen ( the Father of China) Soong Hang Ling was the vice percident of CCP Chinese Communist Party until she die. and her youngest sister Soong Mei Ling is Chiang Kai Shek's wife . The KMT keep shake the Forbidden City 2000 years of the treasure. My late father was a soldier in China he alway said Chiang was a good men but his relative were corrupted. A weak leader bleed corruped followers. follow the money of the auction house. People tried to stay away from talking about "Corruption" It was and still is a cancer of any fail Government. Communist in China in 1949 (the year I was born )were totally curl about it.

  • @penlei003I
    @penlei003I 3 года назад +7

    Mao Zedong wanted to visit the United States in 1946, but because the U.S. congressmen who provided political contributions from the Kuomintang opposed it,
    Mao failed to get in touch with the United States. Witnessing the extreme corruption and incompetence of the Kuomintang and supporting the establishment of good relations with the Chinese Communist Party, all American officers were recalled to the United States and some were even prosecuted. They were replaced by officers who were strongly anti-communist. Mao Zedong was a Communist Party. In fact, his relationship with Stalin was very bad. Stalin looked down on him and thought he was just a peasant with the name of the Communist Party.

    • @cattycorner8
      @cattycorner8 2 года назад

      Russia respects China today!

  • @brighthhh7457
    @brighthhh7457 3 года назад +21

    Fun fact: the communist had better economy than kmt even though kmt held most of the rich urban area.

  • @brianlam1663
    @brianlam1663 Год назад

    This sounds like Whaaaalt'er Cronkite!!!

  • @steveweinstein3222
    @steveweinstein3222 3 года назад +1

    Anyone who wants to know the real story should read Barbara Tuchman's Stillwell and the American Experience in China.

    • @majorcalvary6515
      @majorcalvary6515 3 года назад

      Garbage. Barbara Tuchman never been to China. She the most overrated Pullizer writer. Stilwell was the worst American General in WW2. Why did Truman quash General Wedemeyers China paper? Read a book China Story by Freda Utley, who was highly praised by President Reagan. Freda lived in Soviet Union and China.

    • @steveweinstein3222
      @steveweinstein3222 3 года назад

      @@majorcalvary6515 She was grew up in China and spent several decades there.

    • @steveweinstein3222
      @steveweinstein3222 3 года назад

      @@majorcalvary6515 She grew up there. Her parents were missionaries. I swear, some of the comments I read here just boggle the mind with their ignorance.

  • @wankee888
    @wankee888 2 года назад +7

    america always manages to choose the wrong side since 1945

    • @Xanthas998
      @Xanthas998 2 месяца назад

      Also the soviet afghan war, we should have helped Moscow

  • @user-hn1wf8lb4i
    @user-hn1wf8lb4i 2 года назад +6

    In fact, up to now, the map of the Republic of China (Taiwan) also includes Outer Mongolia.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 года назад +5

      A sovereign stupidity of Taiwan to put itself on the map including Mongolia. Mongolia itself is a sovereign and world-renowned country. In principle, Taiwan is NOT a country, it is a US Military Base. Taiwan has "life" only cuz of the military force of the US. Taiwan is not recognized by the UN (United Nations Organization). Of the 195 countries that exist in the world,

    • @user-hn1wf8lb4i
      @user-hn1wf8lb4i 2 года назад +2

      @@salvadorvizcarra769 The US military withdrew from Taiwan as early as January 1, 1979. The nature of Taiwan is different from that of South Korea and Japan.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 года назад +4

      @@user-hn1wf8lb4i The US Sixth Fleet is stationed in Hawaii, Okinawa, AND AT THE NAVY BASE OF TAIWAN. The US Navy has never withdrawn from Taiwan. With the intention that the Island of Taiwan would join the United Nations Organization, the protocols of 1977-78-79 were signed, so that on paper it would appear that the US did not occupy the territory of Taiwan. But in fact, the US is still present in Taiwan to this very day. The nature of Taiwan is NOT different from that of the southern territory of the Korean Peninsula or Japan.

    • @user-hn1wf8lb4i
      @user-hn1wf8lb4i 2 года назад +2

      @@salvadorvizcarra769 The foundation for the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and the United States is that the United States recognizes the one China principle and that Taiwan is a province of China. Otherwise, China and the United States will not establish diplomatic relations.
      Maybe in the future, the United States will break diplomatic relations with China for the sake of Taiwan, but at that time, it doesn't matter to China. Taiwan is the core interest of China, but Taiwan is not the core interest of the United States. I think one day, the United States will use up the last value of Taiwan to exchange something with China. Judging from the current development trend, the PLA has long broken through the first island chain, and the future second island chain and even the PLA's global deployment will not be far away. The significance of Taiwan can not stop the rise of China.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 года назад +3

      @@user-hn1wf8lb4i Effectively, that's right. Yes; It is obvious that for the US the US Embassy in Beijing is more important than the entire island of Taiwan. However, we must not forget that the US has 93 Military Bases right in front of China, and the "Undeclared" Military Base in Taiwan is just as important as the one in Okinawa. Taiwan has no future as an independent and sovereign country. Taiwan plays lies when it claims that the presence of the US is an "Acceptable Presence", and that the debt of 1 Billion dollars for equipment, weapons, facilities, warships, fighter jets and air and ground missiles, it is a debt of "Friendship". China will take back the island of Taiwan perhaps in less than 20 years, and all this debate about the sovereignty of Taiwan as an independent country will have been forgotten.

  • @asmodeus0454
    @asmodeus0454 7 месяцев назад +1

    The history of the last phase of the Chinese Civil War 1945-50 is much neglected in tbe West. There was still fighting going on in China in pockets even after Chiang finally withdrew to Taiwan in 1949 and Mao proclaimed the People's Republic on 1 October 1949. This continued until 1950. The KMT Army presence in Yunnan continued for decades.

  • @user-yf3xh8wi7r
    @user-yf3xh8wi7r 2 года назад +11

    Chang Kai shen has no talent in war but mao ze dong is a genius of war…

    • @chairmanlebzong5456
      @chairmanlebzong5456 2 года назад +6

      Yeah Mao Zedong he's also genius for killing 100 million Chinese people in the process

    • @yume6532
      @yume6532 2 года назад +1

      @@chairmanlebzong5456 CKS would have killed 1 billion Chinese people if he was in power.

    • @chairmanlebzong5456
      @chairmanlebzong5456 2 года назад +2

      @@yume6532 if Mao Zedong remain in power if he not died
      All china's population is no more
      Luckily he died and china is saved from Mao's reign of terror and economic suffering

    • @yume6532
      @yume6532 2 года назад +1

      @@chairmanlebzong5456 You don't know that.

    • @chairmanlebzong5456
      @chairmanlebzong5456 2 года назад +2

      @@yume6532 i always know alwaysssss

  • @antonioartuso6958
    @antonioartuso6958 2 года назад +10

    Congratulations for this and for the other excellent documentaries presented by Periscope Film. They show the clear differences between the capitalist-imperialist line and the socialist-communist line in (1) ideology (vision of the world); (2) politics (ecibinic, political and social program for the workers and the people and for the rulling classes); and (3) organization (economic, political, military, heath, education, ethics). Capitalism-imperialism is a system, a mode of production, a type of ownership of everything essential for life based on individualism, greed, domination of others, etc., while socialism is a system based on the collective ownership of all the means of production (land, tools, machines, means of transportation, etc.). Throughout the history of mankind, one mode of production was always replaced by a better mode of production : from primitive communism (prehistoric societies), to slave based empires of the Antiquity (Egypt, Mesopotamia, Greece, Rome, etc.), to the feudal societies (with nobles and serves), to capitalism. The French and the Industrial revolutions created 2 new classes, the bourgeoisie (the capitalists) and the proletariat (the working class). It is evident that capitalism is concentrating all the machines, the meanes of production in fewer and fewer hands and that the gap between rich bilionnaires and poor workers is becoming explosive. Capitalism is destroying the planed and is destroying itself. Socialism was born with the deep analysis of Marx and Engels, who studied the German philosophy of Hegel, the British political economy (Adam Smith, Ricardo, etc.) and the analysts of the French Revolution (the class analysis, the class struggle, the feudal and the capitalist states, etc.). The Soviet Revolution, the Chinese Revolution, the socialist revolutions and the national liberation revolution throughout the world show that the international working class and the peoples of the world are growingly conscient and actively preparing to put and end to the exploitation of the workers by the capitalists, the oppression of the peoples by the capitalist state, the plunder of the natural resources of the countries by the monopolies, the constant crisis (economic, political, social, ecological, hunger, humanitarian crises due to the capitalist planning of the world economy for profit instead of the socialist planning of the economy to serve the people), the growing fascism and the permanent imperialist wars. For a united front against fascism and war - Canada - pueblo1917@gmail.com

    • @cattycorner8
      @cattycorner8 2 года назад +1

      LOL Let me guess...you are a Communist Your education/programming is evident. You have been seriously misled. Capitalism is the most equitable of all systems. It allows mankind to reach heights not possible under Socialist regimes, which in the name of "equity" hold the masses down in callow mediocrity. It is as unnatural as it is disastrous.

    • @ninamartin1084
      @ninamartin1084 2 года назад +1

      Only 1 correction to your excellent analysis, which is that capitalism is an economic system, not a political one. In fact communism relies on centralised capitalism. There are only 2 questions arising - which system is most compatible with human nature without recourse to repression and totalitarianism, and which system will allow for the continued survival of the vast and poorly understood web of life on this beautiful planet of ours on which all human life depends.

    • @cattycorner8
      @cattycorner8 2 года назад +1

      @@ninamartin1084 What an intelligent response. Please tell me you are busy influencing young minds somewhere within our schools!

  • @davebryan8416
    @davebryan8416 2 года назад

    I wish the MST3K crew was sitting at the bottom of the screen

  • @robertnegron9706
    @robertnegron9706 3 года назад

    Not a simple solution in China. Centuries of disputes etc.

  • @richardea4223
    @richardea4223 3 года назад +8

    This is an object lesson for our second Civil War. Lock and load, guys, we are in for a rough ride.😎

    • @Amadeus-ni3et
      @Amadeus-ni3et 3 года назад +9

      Vietnam, Korea, Bay of Pigs, etc. Just sending more young men to their deaths just because people run their country in a way you don't agree with.

    • @richardea4223
      @richardea4223 3 года назад +1

      @@Amadeus-ni3et Maybe you are the problem, commie.😎

    • @AussieFlavio
      @AussieFlavio 3 года назад

      @@Amadeus-ni3et The problem with the communist way of running your country is that they can't keep it to their own countries.
      Nobody would mind Cuba being a concentration camp if they didn't export their dogma of hatred to anywhere in the world that they can.
      We'd go there, buy their women for a bar of soap as we always do, and leave them to their little delusions. The problem starts when they fund and support leftist terrorists across South America and Africa.
      And that is just the case of Cuba.

    • @user-xg8yy7yl1d
      @user-xg8yy7yl1d 3 года назад +7

      A second american civil war would look more like the breakup of yugoslavia than the chinese civil war.
      There would be no USA as we know it afterward and no real winner just a bunch of smaller countries who all hate eachother.

    • @Amadeus-ni3et
      @Amadeus-ni3et 3 года назад +7

      @@AussieFlavio the same way the us overthrows any democratically elected leaders for their interests?

  • @steventan3656
    @steventan3656 2 года назад +7

    In China wars against the Japanese , Komingtang Chiang never WON A SINGLE although with US backing together with US MODERN WAR WEAPONS !
    For MAO under the RED No 8 Army , MAO , Chow EL , Choo Tek n others never lost A Single War since 1937 till end of WW2 .

  • @GludiusMaximus
    @GludiusMaximus 3 года назад +2

    Why wasn't i shown these in school?

    • @therealdeal2163
      @therealdeal2163 3 года назад +1

      Because your education is rubbish ?

    • @whosurdaddy1975
      @whosurdaddy1975 2 года назад

      LGBTQ+ rights is more important for you

    • @Qingep
      @Qingep 2 года назад

      @@whosurdaddy1975 How's this related to the video?

  • @user-hi9kk1gt9t
    @user-hi9kk1gt9t 3 года назад +8

    The United States had better not intervene in the civil wars of countries in the Confucian cultural circle. Every time the United States chooses sides in this kind of civil war, it will pay a huge price. North Korea and Vietnam are small models of China, which makes the United States very uncomfortable.

    • @sc9881
      @sc9881 2 года назад

      What price did we pay for in Korea? We won that one.

    • @user-hi9kk1gt9t
      @user-hi9kk1gt9t 2 года назад

      @@sc9881 The Soviet Union and Japan won. Use your own brain, idiot

    • @sc9881
      @sc9881 2 года назад

      @@user-hi9kk1gt9t The Soviets and Japanese won? In Korea? Are we talking about the same war? They weren’t even on the same side. There is an idiot in this thread, but I think you’ve misidentified him

    • @user-hi9kk1gt9t
      @user-hi9kk1gt9t 2 года назад +1

      @@sc9881 I will not discuss this with a fool who has no international knowledge

    • @servicespropace7484
      @servicespropace7484 2 года назад

      @@sc9881 USSR need a boarder whch China and North Korea would proptect it. USSR itself also wished not to get into the battlefield at that time so it might better recover from WWII. Soviets got it with millitary and economic support to China and North Korea. Japan after WWII lost everything gained and desperately needed to revive its economy and political status in the world. With US and international millitary intervention in Korean War using Japan as a front base, supplies were manufactured, packed and transported from Japan, and US government decided to loose the control on Japanese government which original was designed to be totally reformed under US supervision. Japan got to survive. Both country achieved their political and strategical goals. They won.
      US aimed to eliminate comminisim in Korea and hence reduce USSR influence in North East Aisa. They failed. North Korea aimed to unite the country, and they too failed. South Korea, wanted independance and though they still exists but they still have no military control of their army in the war against North Korea. The commanding right remains with US until this day. They failed.
      And finally China, which wanted a war to solidate its international legitemacy in the world, and estabalished a safty barrier from US in that area. In this matter, China succeeded in only part of its strategic goals with heavy cost. The cost of the Korea war in a way delayed its economy development for at least 10 years and most importantly stimulated US government to intervene in China's effort to liberate Taiwan from KMT. Taiwan remains independant, in most cases at least. And I am not sure if you know, Korea War is in armistice, not ended techinically. So China failed but only achieving part of the objectives.
      And the price US paid for Korea war despite death and Mcarthur, is that US would not dare to cross any line drawed by China in any war between US and any country politically supported by China after 1952. And yes I am referring to Vietnam War and 17 degree line. If you dont know this neither, please stop acting like an ignorant dumbass and go read!

  • @Highway541
    @Highway541 3 года назад +6

    Fact- when the Koumintang Nationalist requested help from U.S. but denied, they said it is an internal problem, and today the communist are thorn on their neck

    • @glorych1168
      @glorych1168 3 года назад +1

      ya
      destiny of China linked to USA. since 1928
      Truman abandoned chiang n roc doomed

    • @sydneycalton5693
      @sydneycalton5693 2 года назад

      can you predict what the world would be like in the future 50 years?

    • @Highway541
      @Highway541 2 года назад

      @@sydneycalton5693 I dont know Im not a fortune teller,

  • @charsensei878
    @charsensei878 3 года назад +7

    11:17 ridiculously wrong location of Suchow

    • @xz6107
      @xz6107 2 года назад +1

      Suchow是指徐州,淮海战役。

  • @victorchen3245
    @victorchen3245 2 года назад

    2:14 What were those guys throwing before charging? Definitely not grenades so that they could conveniently run into the blast radius in the next 3 seconds right?

    • @user-wf5zy7cd8s
      @user-wf5zy7cd8s 2 года назад

      防御型炮仗.利用地形气势打击敌人的士气。

  • @mikeschroepfer8956
    @mikeschroepfer8956 3 года назад

    Sad chapter, noatie fed nationalists by withholding suppplies.

  • @jjc4232
    @jjc4232 3 года назад +38

    The Chinese people were mostly farmers from the countryside. They have been Bullied by the minority of landlords and city people for centuries. Communist free them from being suppressed and united them to take the country, fairness and lives back for themselves. That's why Mao won, because he gain the support of the Chinese people.

    • @nahtatroll
      @nahtatroll 2 года назад +6

      And then after that Mao decided to starve 40 million of them.. I guess in the end the Chinese people are always screwed over.

    • @bunnieblu7096
      @bunnieblu7096 2 года назад +8

      Lol he didn't lol
      Study more about it

    • @cattycorner8
      @cattycorner8 2 года назад +2

      Not the 3M++ Chinese nationalists that wanted freedom.

    • @taiwandxt6493
      @taiwandxt6493 2 года назад +5

      You're right, but you know what they say about communism. That shit sounds great, doesn't work.

    • @heheheha5726
      @heheheha5726 Год назад +1

      @@taiwandxt6493 but it did work, how do you think China got to where it is today? and no you can't say capitalism introduced by deng, because you don't create productive forces out of nothing, all the material needs were made under mao before the capitalists came in and took advantage of the people and people protested

  • @user-mh8oi8mc9g
    @user-mh8oi8mc9g 2 года назад +4

    Our chairman mao is great man in china🇨🇳❤️

  • @user-tl1nz6tu7b
    @user-tl1nz6tu7b 2 года назад +1

    法海雷音如來 _____()_____

  • @hello-sn6vp
    @hello-sn6vp 2 года назад

    11:08,Suchow,苏州?Wrong location.

  • @yohananlau1620
    @yohananlau1620 3 года назад +9

    Damn that ROC have lose this battle!

    • @user-wu6tf5ns5g
      @user-wu6tf5ns5g 3 года назад +6

      a few of people knows that "George C. Marshall "only wants ccp to negotiate with real china, but without knowing the property of ccp.. lossing the best time to kill mao...

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 года назад +4

      @@user-wu6tf5ns5g This war was NOT lost by ROC. This war was "ALSO" lost by the US. The other wars lost by the US Armed Forces are: Korea, Viet Nam and now, Afghanistan.

    • @ophirbactrius8285
      @ophirbactrius8285 2 года назад +1

      Yeah its only from your deluded dirty minded!

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 2 года назад +2

      @@ophirbactrius8285 Oh! So it's just "... My deluded dirty minded?" I thought these were verifiable FACTS. I see that I'm wrong and that the US Armed Forces were NOT defeated in Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Somalia, Lebanon, Afghanistan... and also on the island of Taiwan. Well... In which bookstore can I buy other History lines that say otherwise? Cuz I need help.

    • @ophirbactrius8285
      @ophirbactrius8285 2 года назад +1

      @@salvadorvizcarra769 dont worry i didn't meant it to you ma bruh, its for other person. 🙂✌️

  • @pgdog888
    @pgdog888 3 года назад +10

    Thank God. Communist won. If not China today under KMD will be a disaster. My father join the PLA at age 15 to fight against Japan then defended Canton against KMD forces after ww2.

  • @DinoCism
    @DinoCism 2 года назад +2

    Chiang Kai-awwSchucks-that-didn't-go-as-planneddid -it-guys?

  • @golonawailus4312
    @golonawailus4312 2 года назад +2

    the same thing repeats in afghanistan now

  • @JosephOccenoBFH
    @JosephOccenoBFH 3 года назад +8

    Long live Chang Kai Shek !!
    Long live Taiwan !! 🇹🇼

    • @Williamzhao1100
      @Williamzhao1100 3 года назад +1

      Go vote for you pathetic KMT party, 烂泥扶不上墙的政党,正好配烂泥扶不上墙的台湾

  • @zillsburyy1
    @zillsburyy1 10 месяцев назад +3

    TAIWAN # 1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @Basedlocation
      @Basedlocation 9 месяцев назад +2

      HAIL THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC 🚩💪

  • @user-xi8zy9oq4v
    @user-xi8zy9oq4v 3 месяца назад

    the video which never seen befor in Taiwan

  • @hellclub8501
    @hellclub8501 3 года назад +1

    4:22 what they say

  • @helloworld0911
    @helloworld0911 3 года назад +7

    Observe how Tibet was in China before the Communists!

    • @yanliew4027
      @yanliew4027 3 года назад +1

      Tibet was in China from early dynasty rule!

  • @peterchung2262
    @peterchung2262 2 года назад +12

    6:48 i feel bad for that dude who fell off its horse

    • @yooo1423
      @yooo1423 2 года назад

      I uh laughed ... i am sorry ..

  • @user-bt8xi4cs3w
    @user-bt8xi4cs3w 2 года назад

    随着我们长大,经历这些历史的老人越来越少

  • @willylu88
    @willylu88 2 года назад +2

    If you think about it, the nationalist didn't want to rule China with the communist, isn't that just the same as what China is now - one party system, and the US was ok with that and was supporting it because the nationalist following the US lead. But because communist was following USSR so they are the bad people. I mean the only reason this "rebellion" started is because people are so poor and being supressed to the edge of their tolerance, and the nationalist didn't even try to improve the situation, that's why so many people join the communist. I live in Canada, and the government is all about supporting the poor people, the more money you make the more the government tax you, and give away your tax money to those that are "poor" isn't tha the same philosophy as the communist in this video? LOL.

  • @user-bw2sy1eu4r
    @user-bw2sy1eu4r 2 года назад +3

    The Korean Independence Army fought alongside the British in Burma.

    • @user-dj3lo4iw2f
      @user-dj3lo4iw2f 2 года назад +2

      Korean Independence Army is the army in noth korea only. S. Korea is not independent even today because its military power in US hands. Shame

  • @CCP_zhongguo_sai_B
    @CCP_zhongguo_sai_B 3 года назад +6

    Thanks to the Brits and the Portuguese, Hong Kong and Macau were not part of their game.

  • @Andrew_alxf21
    @Andrew_alxf21 Год назад +1

    I know it's a joke but....
    Chiang Kai Shrek vs Lmao Zedong

  • @kwokleung7955
    @kwokleung7955 3 года назад

    Human have been forget history!