2012 Chevy Impala LTZ 3.6 0-130 mph
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 авг 2024
- A video of my stock 2012 Chevy Impala doing a speed run from a dig.
0-130 mph
Been seeing a whole lot of videos of short 0 to 60 pulls I decided to go pretty much all the way to the top.
I absolutely love this car. My dad has a 2012 LT Impala and it has been great. 300 HP, and reaching the top speed the speed limiter would let us go, which was 112 MPH. It really is too bad he doesn’t drive it anymore because of a steering issue. I miss the car. We sometimes would take it out for abuse with the peppy 3.6 V6 it has and run a few acceleration tests with it. It’s been a fun, speedy ride with her.
What issue does it have with the steering?
@@anyconsolegamer8461 supposedly, he said a steering bearing issue. Luckily I heard from my grandfather today that it's been fixed, and is back on the road better than ever.
an lt does not have 300 HP only the SS and ltz have above 300 the 3.5 is below 250
@@LiteEmUp2531 I am not talking about the 3.5 cause I know it has less than the SS. You mean the older models before 2012. I'm talking about the 2012 LT when they fitted the 3.6 V6 VVT in it that has 300 HP. And in this video, it is a LTZ 3.6 which has the same engine.
Well then they had different engine options or I've seen one swapped popped the hood on a black 2012 lt to find the 3.5 🤷
that thing has a really high power band, you can see it start to accelerate faster after 6k
no, after 3k it digs...
@@MMMovs only because after 3k RPM he pressed it the full way down.
It's the V-tech kicking in.
@@thedirtybubble9613 lol
Definitely don’t recommend for a highschooler.I have one and I’m in highschool.I’ve gotten 2 speeding tickets in it.just because of stupidity
It’s crazy how fast that thing accelerates at highway speeds
I have one. Fast car, but the brakes are terrible. Stops like a sub-compact at high speeds due to the weight, which is why I never got a tune for it. Wish it had good brakes like my 1LE Camaro. That stops on a dime at 150, but even at highway speeds the rotors will warp if you stop too quick, and so bad that it will ruin the calipers. Sucks as otherwise it’s a fun car.
@alexanderkennedy2969 yeah but my Acadia with the same engine and a lot of other family/grocery getter cars with v6’s accelerate the same from zero but have nothing once they hit 60 or 70 this thing still keeps going like a rocket at 100
@alexanderkennedy2969 right and compared to most other sedans with 6 cylinder engines this thing accelerates fast at extremely high speeds unlike most of its competitors during its time
@alexanderkennedy2969 100 percent that’s why these things are so cool along with the Taurus and Chrysler 300 it’s getting to the point where everything is a turbo 4 or even 3 cylinder, its almost to the point where if you want anything with a v6 or v8 you have to get a full size suv or light pick up
@alexanderkennedy2969 yep 4 cylinders will get better mileage when there in vehicles suited for 4 cylinders like a hatchback or a crossover but when you through 4 bangers in full size SUV’s and tune them to make 400lb feet of torque not only will you get worse gas Mileage, those little engines will be done after 100,000 miles.
i rlly miss my 2012 impala, would drive that thing like a racecar. such good handling and speed for what it is
What happened to your Impala? Also I agree. Love impalas from generation 2012 to 2013.
Living the dream currently, it really is surprising how how fast it can switch during revs
Good shit bro I’m about to get one Monday and I glad you posted this💯
That's a good choice, take care of her and she'll take care of you.
@@HutchCanisDV lol bro I got it 💀 pep the profile pic 🤣🤣🤣
Old traverse hits 7000RPM then shifts just like this Impala. After all , they both share the same engine.
Not on its own lol...
@@GameTesterDev what you gotta do to it to make it redline
Well does the Traverse have a 3.6 V6 VVT used in the Impala?
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 yes
@@christianf.2025 alright. Makes sense then.
3.6 will definitely run 💪🏾
That shit is running without a problem
I had a 2012 LTZ, and it was such a fun car that surprised a lot of people. Mine managed to take a 350Z and a ‘98 Mustang GT that had minor engine work done. They were both close races, but the big Impala would pull on them. The car was roomy and got good mileage as well. I loved it until it was stolen by a crackhead and he run over a fire hydrant at 80 mph knocking the right front tire clean off the car and tearing the front passenger door off as well. I can’t look at a silver Impala to this day without getting mad all over again
Screw that druggie piece of shit. A methhead came and stabbed the tire on my 08 Impala so I can definitely relate. Luckily all we had to do of course was replace a tire, so I'm sorry you actually lost your car because of one. Wish they'd realize what that brainrotting shit does to them
You can't have nice things living in the hood. Envy and jealousy or the mindset of others thinking you think your better than them will get you looked at every time.
yeah live in a better place. i have lived around people who complain about the filth around them all day...they have the means to leave but never do
@@retiredsnowbunnyhunterx5106 but I live in the country about 13 miles from town. The guy that stole my car was from a city about 70 miles away.
@@LamelKendrick I live in the country where most people are good people, with the occasional meth addicted redneck. My car was stolen by a guy from a city 70 miles from me
Damn that’s fast for what it is
well it has 300hp so it’s expected
it actually has 211
@@mediumclearproductions7444 the 3.6s have 300-305 hp and 264 lb ft of torque
@@Dlri Oops I read it wrong, I read the title as 3.5
Those Impalas are no slouch!
The LFX is a great engine.
Hell to the yeah! My LT only goes to 115.
Tuned
got a 2014 impala limited ltz. love these cars
These really have 300 horsepower
got similar year police cars here in gillette. the mechanics run Napa Fleet brake rotors on them because they never squeek or warp. but they said they use Napa Adaptive One if they cant get Fleet.
I have the '15 LTZ and that big thang is quick!
Nice dude that’s probably quicker than my 08 imp SS 😞😭😭
They look about the same to me
@@jeffringer236 I've raced the SS Impala in the past, neck and neck in the beginning assuming both drivers get a perfect launch, however that V8 torque starts reeling the 3.6 back in up past 100mph-110mph or so but not by to much. I have much respect for the 5.3 Impala SS.
@@HutchCanisDV damn, I thought the 3.6 would’ve stood it’s ground due to its gearing
@@jeffringer236 The 3.6 is a monster in it's own way. I've surprised lots of people with just how fast it is. It stands it's ground better then you think. Trust me :)
@@HutchCanisDV yeah I had a 2013 LTZ, it ran a 14.4 stock it shocked the hell out of me
UPDATE: In my last comment my dads 2012 Impala was fixed from the steering bearing. Well, now the motor is locked and won't start cause there was no oil.
Now, it needs an engine replacement from Chevy. Very, very unfortunate, but hopefully we can get her back on the road. I love that car.
Was no one checking the oil level? I heard these 3.6 engine are notorious for burning oil if PCv valve ain't modified with a catch can.
@@retiredsnowbunnyhunterx5106 he wasn't that day. In fact, we're not even sure what the issue was. We thought it was the oil but then he said it was the timing chain, but I'm not sure. It acted weird and next thing we know it locked up.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 Yep that sounds right. The timing chain stretched. Dirty and low oil will do that. Have to change the oil frequently on these engines. Outside of that it's a fun car to drive. I have an 07 G6 GTP with the old 3.6 six speed. It gets up an go with only 252hp so I can imagine how fast the 2012 Impala your dad have is faster. I use my G6 as a daily driver too but I stay on my oil changes like every 3k with Valvoline extended synthetic oil and good filter as well as change that pcv valve every 9k. So far I haven't seen any oil leak or burning oil. No light or check engine light either. I bought the car used with 155k I now have have 167k. Haven't done that oil catch can either. Seem like the previous owner took good care of it from what I notice. Hopefully your dad can get it back on the road soon. Not sure what the better option would be for him to replace the chains or get another engine.
@@retiredsnowbunnyhunterx5106 he was gonna fix it but he decided to let the Chevrolet dealer handle it. Going back to the car though, yeah it really is fun. Like this dude in the video, he said it's real fun. And we have had our fair share of fun in this car just as much. Surprised people with it a lot cus nobody expects it to spew 300 horses. But it's to be expected since the Camaro RS shares the same engine from what I've heard. It's the cool grandma car lol
In all honesty though, it's really fun and quick for a grocery getter. It's a really fun and cool little car.
Let me guess 2nd gear is out and your transmission is almost shot but the Chevy Impala was built so good it will last 20 more years before the transmission blows up completely. That is what's in my car and a lot of people's impalas
I just wonder had Chevy not put such a restrictive exhaust system and air intake system what more HP they could have squeezed out. Also, the tall gears they put in these cars. The 3.6 Camaro has 323 HP with the same engine.
Well the 3.6 was used in many other cars like Traverse and Acadia, as well as Impala. So it makes sense they had to do it. These are family cars for the daily commute, not a muscle car used to tear it around.
Although both Chevys, Camaro and Impala, are quite monstrous for what they are. Especially Impala since nobody expects it to have a Camaro RS engine besides people who actually know, like me.
impala 3.6 is about .8 secs slower in 0-60 than the camaro - it's a good difference. impala still reasonably fast, if not properly quick, for a budget family sedan. tops out 149 ungoverned. I want a camaro 3.6 or 2.0 but live in a state with snowfall - and also i'm cheap and rather buy 12 year old impalas ngl! camaro maybe in 5-6 years when they are down another 30-50% in value
@@LamelKendrick that'd be a good analogy
Thinking about modding my impala with those exact features 😎
Say what you want but the 3.6 from gm hauls ass and sounds good too. Comparing GM's 3.6L and the Pentastar 3.6L I would end up picking GM. I think the Penastar sounds good and does move with the right trans but I feel the Gm still has better reliability. Eventhough I know some earlier issues and people knock it. I had a CTS in the past and, sold it several years ago. The car is still going strong with 220K miles on it. Original engine and ZF 6 speed. I had a 2015 Durango with the 3l6 Penastar and at 78k 2 of the lifters began to fail. I religiously maintain cars. So for me the GM wins that contest
Its sad how little GM did with this car. Its very underrated.
Yup. For starters, making this car FWD was a joke. A car this big and heavy was never meant to be FWD.
It’s really fast for a car meant for satisfaction.
Love my 2013 impala
It looked like it had a little more left. Did you run out of road or did the governor kick in?
There is no governor
I think these cars can go up to 150 mph if you have a long enough road.
@TheRandomgamer that's actually kind of sad tbh... A 4 Cylinder Cobalt can get to 152...
@@GameTesterDev Cobalt can't beat this in a quarter mile race so. . .
@@JDMSpecYugo a quarter mile... It could in a Half mile or a Full mile.
I turned my traction control off which gave me a slower time but here it is ruclips.net/video/qgfZ02cUK3o/видео.html
What did you have done to the car to have it rev so high and go so fast my car shuts off at 112 miles per hour stock what type of program are you running I took mine to the tuning shop and they told me it would cost for credits just for the tune and then they would still I have to tweak everything out what did you do to get that out of it?????
Sure 9k rpm
Dam that's quicker than police interceptor and the police shifts around 4500 rpm
I don't know which police interceptor you'd be referring to but if you think this is quick you should see how the 9c1's get on. Their shifts are more aggressive.
I owned a 2011 Acadia with the 3.6 vvt V6 I think it's 303hp. It had dual exhaust, but twin pipe mufflers on both sides. I called this thing a sleeper from the day I bought it new. That thing would scream, take some twink in his sewbie at a red light and smoke him lol I just traded that in and bought a 2019 FORD FLEX LIMITED. AWD
3.5 ECOBOOST TWIN TURBO dual exhaust. Car has 4,000 miles on it. Now that thing is a true sleeper. The previous owner who ordered it from Ford had something done to modify that motor and instead of pushing the factory 365hp I m told it's now 430. A blast to drive.
Yeah, probably wasn’t an Ecoboost. Those are low 14 second trapping 100mph straight out of the factory. A tune would probably make it low 13’s.
I miss my 2012 impala was so fun to drive with thag 305HP 😔
What happened with it?
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 sold it to my best friend haha. So it's still around, just not mine anymore
@@andrewgraham6602 damn bro. Dad has an ‘12 LT and I love it. He just doesn’t use it because of a steering wheel bearing issue or something.
Damn. I thought the 3.9L in my 06 monte wasn't too bad but this is way quicker.
No 3.9 is weak compared to the 3.6.
Yes the 3.6L is more powerful, but even with 2 more gears, motor trend only got a 6.2 0-60 and 14.8@96.2mph. Motor trend got 7.5 0-60 and 15.6@91.2mph with an 07 3.9L impala police car. My 06 3.9L monte runs 0-60 in 7.0 and I've never run a 1/4 mile with it but I'd assume low 15s. Just FYI, in 2006 the 3.9L was 242hp/242lb-ft and dropped down to i think 224hp right before the 3.6L replaced it. Its actually not that bad if you ever ride in one. I used to own an 03 monte SS with the 200hp 3.8L and I currently have a 3.9L 08 uplander cargo van. Honestly if I were to race them in a straight line, they'd be close...both mid 8s 0-60. And that uplander weighs like 4100lbs plus I have about 400lbs in it. I'm not saying a 3.9 is going to beat a 3.6 by any means but a 3.9 is quicker than you might think.
@@timmypstyle This car in the video has 302 hp from the factory.
@@LT1HILLINGHOE i know.
@@timmypstyle '06 Monte Carlo is nowhere near this quick. Not even close.
90-115 is nuts
Stock? That's almost 7k shift points you had this thing tuned.
No sir i have an impala also , if it's in automatic or manual either one , it will go to still at least 6800 rpms
@@youngslimelife187 there is no manual impala lol
No sir, GM V6 was always a happy high revving engine, despite the earlier 3.6 HORRID issues... Really a great sounding motor.
The stock rev limiter for the GM DOHC v6 is 7000. This is stock. Camaro, traverse, all of them.
@J J Yes that's exactly what he was doing to get it to rev out to close to 7k rpm at the shift points like that. If you look towards the end of the video at the shift selector it briefly showed numbers 5, 4, and 3. He was using the manual shift control during the run.
LTZ’s limiter is between 140-155. I have a 2009 ltz and the limiter comes on at 145
An 09 is never getting to a 145 with the 3.9 engine let alone 130.
I see it’s 47 degrees in New England
I wonder what this car is like to cruise at 120 mph on the highway? What MPG?
Like 18 mpg
@@marleypadilla2706 That's pretty good.
@@thedirtybubble9613 its super smooth at any speed to me. definitely inspires confidence.
My 07 impala has a speed limiter at 172 kmh, is there a way to remove it?
There is a tune you can get, it is a tuner device and it goes into the car computer and I guess removes... Nothing you gotta take or anything, it does it by itself. I don't own a GM so that's why I don't know much about it.
@@kellyoubrejr544 thanks, I found the tune but they don’t sell it anymore
@@alex_288 Kinda figured it, alot of people actually bought them surprisingly!
@@kellyoubrejr544 it sucks cuz I want it to go faster but it’s probably a good thing that I cant
how you hold rpm around 1800rpm before car moves ? as i know you should
got stock torque converter
Hold the brake and press the gas basically a torque launch
Hey now! Sorry for bothering you, but I enjoyed the video! However, I have a 2012 with 183,000 miles on it. Commute car. Ya, it goes! Going to go change the oil now. Thanks again!
what?
How the hell does a 2012 go to 180k miles? My dads LT is barely about to hit 100k. I get it’s a commuter car, but you use it A LOT for that matter!
How do you take the speed limiter off
LTZ does not have limiters.
Good car
That shifting higher when in "manual" low is the same no my 2.4 chrysler 200 lol. Auto itll shift around 6500 but if i go into what Mopar called "Autostick" and just dont shift itll go to 6800. I THINK i seen it hit 6900 once but im mostly sure its 6800
"Autostick"? XD I LOVE IT!!!
Pretty sure LTZ was exclusively the 3.9L
These impala's starting in 2012 using the 3.6L V-6 have way more rpm than than the 2006-09 Impala SS 5.3L V-8. 6800rpm for the 2012 impala and 5800rpm for the 2006-09 impala SS.
@alexanderkennedy2969 Not by much. The 2012 and up Impalas have a 6 speed tranny which is infinitely better than the junk 4 speeds the 06-09 SS had in them. Also, those 4 speeds go out every 75k.
This probably has the LFX engine in it. Sounds like it. It's an improvement over the LLT.
It is the LFX.
Is "L" a no overdrive gear?
In L you can limit what gear it can go up to
Why does it seem like the 3.6 is faster than the 5.3 ….
Does the car drive better in low?
I had a 2012 3.6 v6 bone stock and it didn’t push like that. That’s gotta be tuned for sure
Its not tuned its the ltz
@@Lil_k305 it’s the same engine in the lt,ls and the ltz.
@@georgestewart9657 Is the LTZ more aggressively tuned than the LT/LS models?
@@thedirtybubble9613 Chevy released the vvt (variable valve timing) it’s a high performance engine. They released it in 2011 and it was put on the 2012 and up versions of the impala.
It was in low
had an 08 0-60 was like 10.73 seconds or sum like that but this things gotta be tuned
The 08 didn't get this engine they started putting the 3.6 in the impalas in 2012
@@raytruitt4575 i had a 3.6 or the "3600 series"
@@malikmlanzi5493 doesn’t mean that the car is tuned. Impala LS, LT, and LTZ cars after 2012 had a 3.6 V6 VVT in them. They haul ass very much and I speak from experience cause we have a 2012 LT and it hauls so much.
08 had the shit engine, mush slower
@@nyrider8396 yeah exactly. The 2012 and 2013 had more power and fun.
Why is it in lower gear?
Hello people. I'm not american and I'm not usual with automatic transmissions. I have à question..
What is the "L" for ?? PRND"L" ???
Low Gear... On the 2014-2016 models, there's a paddle shifter on the back of the steering wheel where you can shift manually from 1st to 6th gear.
@@GameTesterDev
Oh ! Is that a kind of sequential gearbox ? I rent this car when I was in vacation in USA few years alors and I never paid attention to that.
It's a good and powerful car. I love it.
Thank you for the explanation. 👍🏿
@@GameTesterDev It's for lower gear on some cars like ford it stops the transmission mission for going into the next gear but on some other cars it's different.
How did you get rid of the speed limiter????!!!!!!
LTZ doesn't have a speed limiter.
His is definitely tuned mine doesnt hit 7k rpms like that and its a ltz as well
If you put it in L mode it raises the shift points.
Also how does it rev to 7k rpm?
3.6 has always revved to 7k in some GM products... Despite it's HORRID issues, it was a happy high revving motor!
When is L it shifts about 300 rpm higher mine does it too
@@kellyoubrejr544 Didn't GM fix their timing chain issues in these motors by the time they put them in the Impalas? I heard it was anything pre-2012 the 3.6 engines had timing chain problems.
@@thedirtybubble9613 That's what I heard also. I'm not sure when they fixed the issue. I just know in the 10s they supposedly fixed it.
@@thedirtybubble9613 that’s what gym says, my 2018 Traverse is in the shop right le for time chain issues!
Is that stock
That was in low
Is this a police impala? I thought they revved up to 6k not 7?
No this is a standard model. For '12-'13 model year you had the old body style with the new (at the time) LFX 3.6 V6. Which has a redline of 6900RPM. It's a far better engine than the 3.5 & the 3.9 pushrod motors it replaced.
@@operator91210 Yeah it's a shame GM didn't put the 3.6 in the 2006-2011 Impalas. Those pushrod motors were reliable but just too slow for these heavy cars.
@@thedirtybubble9613 the reason they didn't put it in the '06 was because it wasn't even in development at that point
@@operator91210 The LFX version wasn't. By all means, the previous 3.6 version before the LFX had timing chain issues so maybe it was good they waited until 2012.
@@thedirtybubble9613 the only reason these motors had timing chain issues was because nobody services the car at the required intervals.
around 6.5 seconds 0-60mph
it woulda been faster if u knew how to use the paddle shifters
The paddle shifters in these cars don’t work like real paddle shifters, they’re more like the old Chevy style 3 2 1 on the gear selector, if you keep it floored and shift up a gear at like 4K for example it’ll still shift when it wants to at like 6800. The only reason he had it in manual 1 is because it lets it rev out a little longer to like 6900 7k.
@@derekmooney7525 Very well put
I raced one of these in my 170 horsepower golf. He didn’t stand a chance since we were racing in a residential and the race was over and I passed him by the time he got in the powerband. Idek why the hell we were racing in front of houses in broad daylight people around
Obviously the Golf would win in taking twists and turns because of the suspension it has but try beating one in a straight line lmao, sorry but the 3.6 Impala would take your Golf to Gapplebees.
@@GameTesterDev well it didn’t because we racing in a neighborhood he couldn’t pass me
Stop racing in a neighborhood you're going to kill somebody
@@brynnleahnayvieghlaykynnn6175 that does not make sense. Racing in a neighborhood and passing a 2012 Impala in a 170 HP golf? I don’t think so. 300 to 170 would make a 130 HP difference. Impalas like these can break at least 150+ MPH, but a 170 HP Golf would possibly break 110. And if it came stock for 170 HP, there isn’t any other explanation other than the car being tuned.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 you’re wrong you don’t know real world plus that golf I hit 130 pretty easily
Funny how a 3.6 pentastar v6 makes just as much power as this using port injection whereas the LTZ 3.6 is direct injection
Well it's GM. They don't make quite as much power as the Fords and Dodges. But that Pentastar will crap out sooner than a GM engine.
@@thedirtybubble9613 I work for Chrysler and I regularly see 3.6 pentastars with 200,000, 250,000 miles, had a ram 1500 with the 3.6 last week with 338,000 miles
@@thedirtybubble9613It’s the opposite. The GM 3.6 is far less reliable than the Pentastar.
Mine stops at 107 then a governor kicks in. 06 3.5
Over kill tune to remove speed limiter ?
He's stock. They run like that.
I have the 2016 limited ltz and governor kicks on at 112...
@@evangonzales1783 really? I have the 2016 Limited and I've gotten to 140
Very late reply I know but the older LTZ trims like the one in this video did not have a speed governor and people have said that they have gotten them up to 150mph or so. It came from the factory like this. Hope this helps 👍🏻
What is faster the ltz or ss
that have the same hp so idk
0-60 the LFX V6 will beat a SS but on the top end over 80mph the V8 SS would gain ground. Both have the same top speed. The SS loves to eat transmissions though
what is the L gear
A gear that makes the car seem a bit faster I guess. 2012 Impalas in L would rev to 7000 rpm and would select what gear it would shift to.
It allows me to take the rpm all the way 7k. It's not necessarily for more power up there though there's still power being made up at 7k, it's to keep the rpms inside the ideal power range. About 4500-7000 rpms.
It essentially allows you to shift gears manually 1-6.
Why were you in low tf
Mo power lol
Shift points are moved up. My chrysler 200 is the same
A lot more power... You can shift right at 7K RPMS and it maxes your power output in between shift points.
I just learned how to use it 😂
@@bassblaster505 that's partially correct... It's manually shifting, it doesn't shift on its own.
Addd
Just as fast as my 08 LTZ mines just a tad bit faster
If you have an 08 LTZ then you have the 3.9 which is not faster than the 3.6 version.
@@thedirtybubble9613 trust me it’s faster I have a video of the movement speed
@@SsMike You must have had it tuned then. 230 HP vs 300 HP.
@@thedirtybubble9613 2008 ss or 2013 ltz which is faster
Gapped one of these in my 08 3.2 TL
That’s 4 speed transmission
It is not. All Chevy Impalas after 2012 had a 3.6 V6 VVT with a 6 speed. All Impalas pre 2012 had the 4 speed.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 Ook I was thinking about getting impala ss what chu think anying advise
@@millzblack8467 they are not bad cars. However I would get anything after the 2012 models because of the engine and transmission used before 2012. Older Impala SS models had a 5.3 V6 with a 4 Speed but it wasn’t that good. I’d say get an Impala LT, LS, or LTZ after 2012 because those are the best years of Impala. Also, I would say the acceleration is kinda the same, it’s probably just the speed. Otherwise they are great cars. I would just get any Impala 2012-2013. Treat her right, and she will do the same to you.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 Ook yea I just like the way they sound as well
@@millzblack8467 they sound good, but if you want an SS sound, get a 2012 Impala, and swap the exhaust with the one from the SS. Then it’ll sound better.
Nice having a "cadillac engine" isn't lol
I don’t know what to call these engines because it for sure isn’t a Cadillac engine. The 2006-2011 DTS cars accelerate slower than this car does, but he raced a newer Cadillac and it whooped the Impala LT. For sure is not a Caddy pulling that thing.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 Pretty sure the Cadillac CTS had this very same engine. Probably made a little more HP than the Impala version like I think the CTS version made like 310 or 315 HP stock.
@@thedirtybubble9613 maybe, but what kind of CTS?
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 Cadillac CTS coupe, sedan and wagon. Also, according to GM engine authority it was in the ATS sedan, XTS and SRX.
@@thechannelofrandomvideos789 And you have to understand GM restricted so much HP out of the Impala 3.6 in favor of better fuel mileage. The Impala 3.6 had about 15-23 HP less than the other sedans that GM put the LFX in.
Wow slow af. My stock g37 would absolutely dust this. G37 specs - 0-60: 5secs / 60-130: 14secs lol
Bet your G37 doesn't have a trunk the size the Impala has. lol
@@thedirtybubble9613 haha good one. Yeah you won that battle
Do you want to race a stock Sonata N-Line for some cash? If you aren’t too far away, I’ll drive to you.