@@tetispinkman9135 you can stop talking bullshit please!!!! the ARCHER has STANAG 4569 level 2 armor, either against ONLY 7.62 x 39, or the caliber of the AK47!! the CAESAR 6 x 6 has EXACTLY the same armor, only the CAESAR 8 x 8 has superior armor!! STANAG 4569 level 3! but hey, locked in the cabin of the ARCHER, if an FPV drone arrives, you won't hear it!!! the ARCHER is too expensive, too complicated to maintain, does not fit in an A400M, on the other hand the CAESARs are cheaper, easier to maintain, lighter therefore aero transportable not a European A400M! according to you, why didn't the ARCHER 1 sell, except obviously in Sweden since it's an Anglo-Swedish cannon!! on the other hand the CAESAR, it sells like hotcakes LOL when you talk about a subject, talk at least about something you master, me, I don't know anything about football and I don't give a damn about football, I never talk about it! I don't know how to cook, I don't talk about cooking! except in general!
@@grantavakjan9488 false excuse!! against a modern anti-tank missile, even the German Pzh 2000 on a Leopard 1 base will not resist! whether it is a JAVELIN, an AKERON MP, a NLAW and even against a BONUS artillery ammunition in 155 mm, it fires a jet of molten metal at + 3000 ° on the roof, no armored vehicle, no tank can resist! so, what is the use of YOUR ARMOR???? gratuitous infantile assertion! even against an FPV type drone equipped with a double shaped charge RPG7 warhead!
amx 10 was proven as junk in the ukraine totally suicidal to ride into battle in that piece of cr.. It was junk even when designed-the whole idea of mounting a big direct fire gun on rubber wheels is ridiculous and that piece of sh.. costs more than a tank The Czech proved wheeled spgs are actually better in some cases than tracked and armies have been using wheeled recon vehicles and apcs for a long time but for an armored car to act like a tank is nonsensical It just proves French technology is obsolete compared to the Great Powers and French tactical thought is stagnant and has been for the last hundred and twenty years That horror doesnt even have add on armor It shouldnt have been designed in the first place and even if created it should not have been accepted but somehow the French designed it and their army took it in sorry to hurt your delusional feelings but although the truth hurts it also sets you free
@@MrRaulstrnad Ukraine admitted they did use it in the wrong way at first, then they changed their way of using it and it proved to be real good (recon+fire support only). Thing is, like many of old vehicles in any army, it's weak vs uav/drone. It is a recon vehicle, can be used as fire support. High mobility on road and can damage the russian's tanks. It is by no mean to be in front like a tank like they used it at first in Ukraine, it's also a wheeled vehicle so ofc, depending of the weather and terrains, it can't go to some place unlike tracked vehicle. Because it was at first made for the French army needs, mostly in Africa at that time. You're just a hater.
This is a great in between of a tank and a tank killer. I love this vehicle and hope it helps out Ukraine where they need it. Hopefully this will help do quicker reconnaissance.
amx 10 was proven as junk in the ukraine totally suicidal to ride into battle in that piece of cr.. It was junk even when designed-the whole idea of mounting a big direct fire gun on rubber wheels is ridiculous and that piece of sh.. costs more than a tank The Czech proved wheeled spgs are actually better in some cases than tracked and armies have been using wheeled recon vehicles and apcs for a long time but for an armored car to act like a tank is nonsensical It just proves French technology is obsolete compared to the Great Powers and French tactical thought is stagnant and has been for the last hundred and twenty years That horror doesnt even have add on armor It shouldnt have been designed in the first place and even if created it should not have been accepted but somehow the French designed it and their army took it in sorry to hurt your delusional feelings but although the truth hurts it also sets you free
Not Bad, Though not Really a Tank. Correct. This a fire support and recon vehicle, used to support combined arms teams. The AMX-10 RC is a French armoured fighting vehicle manufactured by Nexter Systems for armoured reconnaissance purposes. Equipping French cavalry units since 1981, over 240 remained in service with the French Army in 2021. 108 units were sold to Morocco and 12 to Qatar. "RC" stands for "Roues-Canon", meaning "wheeled gun".
The French AMX series on World of Tanks are some of my all time favorite, a very good balance of armor, mobility, and firepower, and the French make some very good looking and unique looking armor vehicles compared to other countries in my opinion.
@@tetispinkman9135 I don't think he's taking info from a game, but instead, just saying that in "world of tanks" it has a good balance / armor / and stuff, and i agree with the good looking part :P. In real life, it's a speedy boy and French soldiers loved it a lot, even still today !
@@LeSoleilRoyalXIVThe AMX-10 is impressive. It's fast, carries one heck of a cannon for a fast wheeled vehicles, Has provision to operate in contaminated (chemical, biological, nuclear environments) and can go a long range on a tank of fuel. I am surprised that the engine only has 250 horsepower (184 kW), yet can go 53 MPH (85 KPH). That and it's relatively light weight are clear advantages from it being wheeled. The adjustable height reminds me of the Citroen's hydro-pneumatic suspension. Aside from provide protection by keeping low, it also makes it fun to jump :) 1:00
Considering World Defense Budget Ranking, France is not the greatest but have great materials > Leclerc tanks, Caesar artillery, Rafale jetfighters, great formation for conventional and special forces and French Foreign Legion and nuclear weapons. We are not the best army forces in the world but potentials enemys will think twice before attack us.
Much respect to France and President Macron. Both in attempting to prevent the invasion and addressing the invasion once it began, his efforts have been impressive. Also, he makes it all too apparent that we need younger political leaders here in the U.S. - in both parties.
Caesar is a first rate system. The AMX-10 can't go toe-to-toe with Russian MBTs, but it was never meant to do so. It's for recon, and it's great in that role. It will also be great in a supporting role in an aggressive/assault role--MBTs backed up by AMX-10s would be formidable. You really wouldn't want to be in a BMP, BMD, BRDM, or MT-LB staring down a 105mm gun. Jeez, I don't think I'd want to face that in a T-72 or T-80, let alone something older. Anything not a main battle tank from the 1980s or 1990s or newer would be toast.
@@goofthunder3763 for many reasons but the big one is that it shoots a proprietary 105 shell..it's not compatible with other 105mm..additionally as in the use have given so much 105mm ammo to Ukraine, we don't have enough to arm our own new light tank. Is anyone in NATO, but the USA going to ramp up ammo production?
There's a linguistic misunderstanding. "Char" in French has a much more generic meaning than Tank. It's the word that gave birth to the English word "car." A real tank in French is called "char blindé": armoured car. The etymology of "tank" is the hindi word "tānkh" and seems to have been used by the british because they looked like water or fuel tanks. Anyway, when President Macron says we are sending "chars" they don't necessarily mean tanks.
Although this video was posted on March 2, it's clear that the content is at least a month out of date. The video content is good. But I wish these videos would actually embed the date on which they were created. That would resolve confusion about its accuracy.
One, it's not a tank destroyer. They have a specialized 105 mm. It's not the closest thing to a light tank in NATO. Italy has the Centauro, which has way more armor and a 120mm cannon.
That 105mm gun isn't a reliable first-line MBT killer... but it will kill pretty much anything less. Can it reliably first-shot-kill a T-90 or Abrams or Leopard 2? Nope. Can it do so against any APC or IFV or older tanks, like T-60 or T-70 vehicles or older? They really can. If I was in a T-62 or T-72 and going into an environment with AMX-10s, I would really be very unhappy.
@@roentgen571 the AMX10 fires a less powerful 105mm round than the NATO 105mm to reduce recoil. Sure it would destroy IFVs, but the AMX has about the same armor as a western IFV. I don't know but I'd bet a 30mm APFSDS round would go right through the side armor.
Similar economy to UK. Similar military force to UK. And yet France has contributed very very little. I'm actually really surprised considering how allied nations have flocked to Frances defence in the past. Also not surprised at all.
We are a country that has demilitarized a lot since the year 90. Changing a part of a Leclerc tank is more difficult than other tanks and we only have a small quantity. it is also much more expensive, and I don't agree we sent ceasars, AMXs and a lot of ammunition. it's just less impressive than other countries so we don't talk about it... but I'm not surprised you don't know
@Yberai exactly, and the French are also encouraging peace talks between Russian and Ukraine which is good, no need to add more fuel to the fire and make things worse, I'm glad that France isn't instigating the situation, and encouraging peace talks instead.
The war stops when Russia goes back to Russia. They aren't going to do it if you ask them nicely. The UKs doing more for Ukraine than every other mainland Europe country. Its great to see how much you guys look out for each other.
@@sshep86 I'm divided, Easy to be for total war and annihilation when you are on an island or continent very far away. France does what it can and supports Ukraine without hesitation. But meanwhile Ukrainians and Russians are dying. Negotiations was totally rejected by England and America. I do not say that it would have succeeded, but why behave like this?
@@AndriiOsipovUkraineunfortunately your mother and grandmother are pawns of the US military industrial complex, this war is a US proxy war whose aim is to destabilize Russia, Zelenskyy is just a puppet who is getting Ukrainians killed!
"Germany has refused to send Leopard 2 tanks" - is this a russia propaganda video?))) in what universe have Germany refused to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine?)
They did for months and only agreed after the USA agreed to send Abrams. The USA gets hell for "wanting to lead NATO" but the rest of NATO has no balls
Just realize that the content was created based on dated material. Although it was posted on March 2, it was likely created at least 6 weeks earlier. If you ignore the inaccuracies based on date, the actual content specific to the AMX 10 is good.
This war still has a long way to go. It will also allow Ukraine to test several heavy weapon systems for their future post-war army and their capabilities in the scope of their NATO integration.
@@paulstone9667 14 of those vehicles are already in Ukraine. I know it's not much but if you're going to trash talk, at least make sure you have the right information...
@@FRMaverick6 According to a Tweet published by "Philippe Top-Action" on February 15, 2023, a first batch of 14 French AMX-10RC / AMX-10RCR 6x6 anti-tank reconnaissance armored vehicles are on the way to Ukraine. According to our source, a total of 30 AMX-10RC will be delivered to Ukraine.15 Feb 2023. The magic phrase is on the way! so not as yet in Ukraine! French talk a lot but deliver little. Macro is angling to be in on the peace talks so he can strut his stuff and polish his ego!
Those Caesar’s howitzers are amazingly awesome. Probably the favorite vehicle of mine.
well... they are pretty bad in the crew protection
R u kidding me ?
@@grantavakjan9488 only archer is netter if we look into wheeled platforms. But archer is much more expensive and harder to get.
@@tetispinkman9135 you can stop talking bullshit please!!!! the ARCHER has STANAG 4569 level 2 armor, either against ONLY 7.62 x 39, or the caliber of the AK47!! the CAESAR 6 x 6 has EXACTLY the same armor, only the CAESAR 8 x 8 has superior armor!! STANAG 4569 level 3! but hey, locked in the cabin of the ARCHER, if an FPV drone arrives, you won't hear it!!! the ARCHER is too expensive, too complicated to maintain, does not fit in an A400M, on the other hand the CAESARs are cheaper, easier to maintain, lighter therefore aero transportable not a European A400M! according to you, why didn't the ARCHER 1 sell, except obviously in Sweden since it's an Anglo-Swedish cannon!! on the other hand the CAESAR, it sells like hotcakes LOL when you talk about a subject, talk at least about something you master, me, I don't know anything about football and I don't give a damn about football, I never talk about it! I don't know how to cook, I don't talk about cooking! except in general!
@@grantavakjan9488 false excuse!! against a modern anti-tank missile, even the German Pzh 2000 on a Leopard 1 base will not resist! whether it is a JAVELIN, an AKERON MP, a NLAW and even against a BONUS artillery ammunition in 155 mm, it fires a jet of molten metal at + 3000 ° on the roof, no armored vehicle, no tank can resist! so, what is the use of YOUR ARMOR???? gratuitous infantile assertion! even against an FPV type drone equipped with a double shaped charge RPG7 warhead!
People need to stop dissing this vehicle. Used properly, as designed, it is an excellent scout/direct fire support unit.
amx 10 was proven as junk in the ukraine totally suicidal to ride into battle in that piece of cr.. It was junk even when designed-the whole idea of mounting a big direct fire gun on rubber wheels is ridiculous and that piece of sh.. costs more than a tank
The Czech proved wheeled spgs are actually better in some cases than tracked and armies have been using wheeled recon vehicles and apcs for a long time but for an armored car to act like a tank is nonsensical It just proves French technology is obsolete compared to the Great Powers and French tactical thought is stagnant and has been for the last hundred and twenty years That horror doesnt even have add on armor It shouldnt have been designed in the first place and even if created it should not have been accepted but somehow the French designed it and their army took it in
sorry to hurt your delusional feelings but although the truth hurts it also sets you free
@@MrRaulstrnad You need to learn to read. I did not say this vehicle was a tank, or should be used like one. Reading Is Fundamental.
@@MrRaulstrnad Ukraine admitted they did use it in the wrong way at first, then they changed their way of using it and it proved to be real good (recon+fire support only). Thing is, like many of old vehicles in any army, it's weak vs uav/drone.
It is a recon vehicle, can be used as fire support. High mobility on road and can damage the russian's tanks. It is by no mean to be in front like a tank like they used it at first in Ukraine, it's also a wheeled vehicle so ofc, depending of the weather and terrains, it can't go to some place unlike tracked vehicle. Because it was at first made for the French army needs, mostly in Africa at that time. You're just a hater.
This is a great in between of a tank and a tank killer. I love this vehicle and hope it helps out Ukraine where they need it. Hopefully this will help do quicker reconnaissance.
I bet Ukraine won't use them correctly and they will get smoked
amx 10 was proven as junk in the ukraine totally suicidal to ride into battle in that piece of cr.. It was junk even when designed-the whole idea of mounting a big direct fire gun on rubber wheels is ridiculous and that piece of sh.. costs more than a tank
The Czech proved wheeled spgs are actually better in some cases than tracked and armies have been using wheeled recon vehicles and apcs for a long time but for an armored car to act like a tank is nonsensical It just proves French technology is obsolete compared to the Great Powers and French tactical thought is stagnant and has been for the last hundred and twenty years That horror doesnt even have add on armor It shouldnt have been designed in the first place and even if created it should not have been accepted but somehow the French designed it and their army took it in
sorry to hurt your delusional feelings but although the truth hurts it also sets you free
Not Bad, Though not Really a Tank. Correct. This a fire support and recon vehicle, used to support combined arms teams. The AMX-10 RC is a French armoured fighting vehicle manufactured by Nexter Systems for armoured reconnaissance purposes. Equipping French cavalry units since 1981, over 240 remained in service with the French Army in 2021. 108 units were sold to Morocco and 12 to Qatar. "RC" stands for "Roues-Canon", meaning "wheeled gun".
The French AMX series on World of Tanks are some of my all time favorite, a very good balance of armor, mobility, and firepower, and the French make some very good looking and unique looking armor vehicles compared to other countries in my opinion.
Ok kiddo. Lol
World of tanks is not a really good source to get info from
@@tetispinkman9135 I don't think he's taking info from a game, but instead, just saying that in "world of tanks" it has a good balance / armor / and stuff, and i agree with the good looking part :P. In real life, it's a speedy boy and French soldiers loved it a lot, even still today !
@@LeSoleilRoyalXIVThe AMX-10 is impressive. It's fast, carries one heck of a cannon for a fast wheeled vehicles, Has provision to operate in contaminated (chemical, biological, nuclear environments) and can go a long range on a tank of fuel. I am surprised that the engine only has 250 horsepower (184 kW), yet can go 53 MPH (85 KPH). That and it's relatively light weight are clear advantages from it being wheeled. The adjustable height reminds me of the Citroen's hydro-pneumatic suspension. Aside from provide protection by keeping low, it also makes it fun to jump :) 1:00
Merci beaucoup
Considering World Defense Budget Ranking, France is not the greatest but have great materials > Leclerc tanks, Caesar artillery, Rafale jetfighters, great formation for conventional and special forces and French Foreign Legion and nuclear weapons. We are not the best army forces in the world but potentials enemys will think twice before attack us.
Much respect to France and President Macron. Both in attempting to prevent the invasion and addressing the invasion once it began, his efforts have been impressive. Also, he makes it all too apparent that we need younger political leaders here in the U.S. - in both parties.
Caesar is a first rate system. The AMX-10 can't go toe-to-toe with Russian MBTs, but it was never meant to do so. It's for recon, and it's great in that role. It will also be great in a supporting role in an aggressive/assault role--MBTs backed up by AMX-10s would be formidable. You really wouldn't want to be in a BMP, BMD, BRDM, or MT-LB staring down a 105mm gun. Jeez, I don't think I'd want to face that in a T-72 or T-80, let alone something older. Anything not a main battle tank from the 1980s or 1990s or newer would be toast.
Kinda like the Stryker M1128
But worse
@@goofthunder3763 for many reasons but the big one is that it shoots a proprietary 105 shell..it's not compatible with other 105mm..additionally as in the use have given so much 105mm ammo to Ukraine, we don't have enough to arm our own new light tank. Is anyone in NATO, but the USA going to ramp up ammo production?
There's a linguistic misunderstanding. "Char" in French has a much more generic meaning than Tank. It's the word that gave birth to the English word "car." A real tank in French is called "char blindé": armoured car. The etymology of "tank" is the hindi word "tānkh" and seems to have been used by the british because they looked like water or fuel tanks. Anyway, when President Macron says we are sending "chars" they don't necessarily mean tanks.
Thanks for detailing the etymology of 'char' and 'tank'. Knowing this won't help win a battle, but it adds perspective.
Bro where you been? Germany is sending 88 Leopard 2’s not sure why you said they are not
maybe 14 Leo 2 and they try to revive up to 100 Leo1. The other Leo2 come from other europeans and Canada.
Although this video was posted on March 2, it's clear that the content is at least a month out of date. The video content is good. But I wish these videos would actually embed the date on which they were created. That would resolve confusion about its accuracy.
One, it's not a tank destroyer. They have a specialized 105 mm. It's not the closest thing to a light tank in NATO. Italy has the Centauro, which has way more armor and a 120mm cannon.
That 105mm gun isn't a reliable first-line MBT killer... but it will kill pretty much anything less. Can it reliably first-shot-kill a T-90 or Abrams or Leopard 2? Nope. Can it do so against any APC or IFV or older tanks, like T-60 or T-70 vehicles or older? They really can. If I was in a T-62 or T-72 and going into an environment with AMX-10s, I would really be very unhappy.
@@roentgen571 the AMX10 fires a less powerful 105mm round than the NATO 105mm to reduce recoil. Sure it would destroy IFVs, but the AMX has about the same armor as a western IFV. I don't know but I'd bet a 30mm APFSDS round would go right through the side armor.
Looking forward to the comments from all the 15 year old weapons experts who post under these videos, good for a laugh at least.
30 AMX 10 RC will be delivered at the end of this month. Unit already trained in France.
"Germany has turned down a request for Leopard 2 tanks.." eh?
You need to more up to date! Germany has agreed to send Leopard 2 Tanks to Ukraine in late January.
how did they ended up ?
Good
Bad
@@nemiw4429 Opinion respected. But baguette shooter good.
@@Poltard wait wait hold on, I love Baguette 🥖. It shoots bread and prints 3d white flags? Sign me up.
Mhmhm
Soon it will have backup of Stryker and Leopard 1 tanks . Giving tons of fire suport .
That's not even a logical statement, the Styker is a battlefield taxi it only has armor to stop a 50 cal.
Will be prey for drones and artillery.
0:10 who is this Frange guy?
Fratch I think he said. Don't know who that might be
i don't think that things advertised as "heavily armored" lol
Similar economy to UK. Similar military force to UK. And yet France has contributed very very little. I'm actually really surprised considering how allied nations have flocked to Frances defence in the past.
Also not surprised at all.
We are a country that has demilitarized a lot since the year 90. Changing a part of a Leclerc tank is more difficult than other tanks and we only have a small quantity. it is also much more expensive, and I don't agree we sent ceasars, AMXs and a lot of ammunition. it's just less impressive than other countries so we don't talk about it... but I'm not surprised you don't know
@Yberai exactly, and the French are also encouraging peace talks between Russian and Ukraine which is good, no need to add more fuel to the fire and make things worse, I'm glad that France isn't instigating the situation, and encouraging peace talks instead.
@@DerangedLib It's true but he confuses it with cowardice it's sad
The war stops when Russia goes back to Russia. They aren't going to do it if you ask them nicely. The UKs doing more for Ukraine than every other mainland Europe country. Its great to see how much you guys look out for each other.
@@sshep86
I'm divided, Easy to be for total war and annihilation when you are on an island or continent very far away. France does what it can and supports Ukraine without hesitation. But meanwhile Ukrainians and Russians are dying. Negotiations was totally rejected by England and America. I do not say that it would have succeeded, but why behave like this?
good for hit and run!
I love how everyone thinks they are a weapons/mitary vehicle expert. Half the statements on here are wrong
El AMX 10 debe de utilizarse con apoyo aéreo y rapidez de maniobra, golpea y vuelve, tiene rapidez y alcance, eso no tienen los rusos.....
It's been widely reported it's not a tank, so you're just rehashing old stuff.
Me Macron, sent more AMX 10 to Ukraine , as big european county, you have to do more
French continue to use his equipment.. Uk not..
Who ever said that it was a tank??? Oh, yeah, Macron🙄
Arma 8.8 zırhlı araç üstü ne Altay 9 140mm topu olan insansız tank kulesini enterge etmim tasarım olarak yaptim
Glory to Ukraine🇺🇦
Glory to Russia taking out the trash!
@@callumbush1 I said Glory to Ukraine🇺🇦
@@AndriiOsipovUkraine well I don't support evil corporate fascists!
@@callumbush1 who those are? My mom or my grandmom?
@@AndriiOsipovUkraineunfortunately your mother and grandmother are pawns of the US military industrial complex, this war is a US proxy war whose aim is to destabilize Russia, Zelenskyy is just a puppet who is getting Ukrainians killed!
1day old and still obsolete information. waste of time.
Out of date contained.
2022
"Germany has refused to send Leopard 2 tanks" - is this a russia propaganda video?))) in what universe have Germany refused to send Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine?)
They did for months and only agreed after the USA agreed to send Abrams. The USA gets hell for "wanting to lead NATO" but the rest of NATO has no balls
@@corey8420 It think you will find the UK contributed MBTs before any other nation.
Just realize that the content was created based on dated material. Although it was posted on March 2, it was likely created at least 6 weeks earlier. If you ignore the inaccuracies based on date, the actual content specific to the AMX 10 is good.
🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁LION c LIKE No. 252
old news
Completely out of date news
Propaganda channel!
The French tanks could destroy the Russian?!! Sorry it's not exact information even it's not true at all
Typical French too little too late.
This war still has a long way to go. It will also allow Ukraine to test several heavy weapon systems for their future post-war army and their capabilities in the scope of their NATO integration.
this was in early january we were literally the first country to deliver western heavy armor mate
@@phrog773 Not heavy armour mate. And not there yet, and when? France's help has been pathetic, to say the least mate.
@@paulstone9667 14 of those vehicles are already in Ukraine. I know it's not much but if you're going to trash talk, at least make sure you have the right information...
@@FRMaverick6 According to a Tweet published by "Philippe Top-Action" on February 15, 2023, a first batch of 14 French AMX-10RC / AMX-10RCR 6x6 anti-tank reconnaissance armored vehicles are on the way to Ukraine. According to our source, a total of 30 AMX-10RC will be delivered to Ukraine.15 Feb 2023. The magic phrase is on the way! so not as yet in Ukraine! French talk a lot but deliver little. Macro is angling to be in on the peace talks so he can strut his stuff and polish his ego!