Murthy v Missouri

Issue(s): (1) Whether respondents have Article III standing; (2) whether the government’s challenged conduct transformed private social media companies’ content-moderation decisions into state action and violated respondents’ First Amendment rights; and (3) whether the terms and breadth of the preliminary injunction are proper.

[@juliehamill8408]

Hi Professor Carroll! Great panel. Thank you so much.

[@richardleirer]

Thank you for this video. Any chance for a recap on the 6 - 3 decision by you or your panel?
It appears your panel was spot on accurate about the ruling and the punt to no standing leaves a lot undecided.
Love to hear more about the decision.
I am not a lawyer and I have read and listened to the briefs and the oral arguments, as well as having read the decision and dissenting opinion.
Probably most important issue of my life time as a baby boomer.

[@llh3025]

The attorney arguing for the future of free speech on the internet was one of the worst attorneys I've ever encountered. The attorney arguing for censorship crushed it. Very sad.